ABSTRACT
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common medium to large vessel vasculitis of the elderly that can lead to permanent vision loss. Neuroimaging in GCA may reveal optic nerve sheath enhancement, which is a cardinal finding of optic perineuritis (OPN). The clinical manifestations of GCA can mimic that of other ocular disorders including amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy (AAON). We report a case of biopsy-proven GCA in a patient initially suspected to have AAON. This patient presented with bilateral optic disc oedema in conjunction with subacute predominately monocular vision loss and enhancement of the corresponding optic nerve sheath on neuroimaging. Clinicians should recognise that clinical and neuroimaging findings of GCA can mimic a variety of ocular and orbital pathologies including idiopathic OPN and AAON.
KEYWORDS: Optic perineuritis, optic nerve sheath enhancement, giant cell arteritis, temporal arteritis, amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy
Introduction
Optic perineuritis (OPN) is a rare orbital inflammatory disorder affecting the optic nerve sheath that commonly presents with decreased visual acuity, pain on eye movement, and visual field defects.1 OPN can rarely present with orbital signs of ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and proptosis and is a distinct entity necessitating a longer treatment with corticosteroids as compared to typical optic neuritis.1–3 A diagnosis of OPN requires a combination of clinical and imaging findings, specifically optic nerve sheath enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).3 OPN can be idiopathic or occur secondary to a variety of systemic diseases including giant cell arteritis (GCA), a systemic vasculitis of elderly patients which affects large and medium-sized vessels.1 We review the current literature and report an unusual case where optic nerve sheath enhancement on neuroimaging helped to distinguish GCA from the alternative diagnosis of amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy (AAON).
Case
A 72-year-old White Caucasian male presented with painless bilateral subacute sequential central visual acuity loss in the left eye (OS) followed by the right eye (OD) over 3 months. His past medical history was significant for an aortic aneurysm, aortic valve repair and a 1-year history of amiodarone-controlled cardiac arrhythmia. The patient denied headache, pulsatile tinnitus, fever, weight loss, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, or symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica. His visual acuity was in the count fingers range OD and 20/30 OS. His pupils measured 4 mm in the dark and 2 mm in the light with a right relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Humphrey visual field testing showed a dense central scotoma with break out to an inferior altitudinal defect OD and a relatively mild central scotoma with break out to the inferior field OS. On funduscopy, bilateral Frisén grade III–IV optic disc oedema was noted.
His serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 7 mm/hr (normal < 20 mm/hr), C reactive protein (CRP) was < 0.3 mg/dL (normal 0–0.5 mg/dL) and platelet count was 197 x 109/L (normal 150–400 x 109/L). A non-contrast computed tomography scan of the brain was normal. MRI of the brain and orbits demonstrated enhancement of the intraorbital right optic nerve sheath without pathological enhancement of the optic nerve itself. (Figure 1). Serological studies for angiotensin converting enzyme levels, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), aquaporin-4 antibodies (NMO), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG) were negative. A lumbar puncture revealed a borderline elevated opening pressure of 24 cm of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (normal < 20 cmCSF). CSF analysis showed an elevated CSF protein of 83 mg/dL (normal 15–45 83 mg/dL) and glucose 91 mg/dL (normal 40–70 mg/dL). CSF testing for cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus (VZV) and serum testing for Borrelia burgordferi, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and syphilis were negative.
Figure 1.

Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted coronal (left) and axial (right) MRIs showing intraorbital right optic nerve sheath enhancement (yellow arrow)
Empirical treatment with 1 g/day intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) for 5 days followed by an oral prednisone taper and tocilizumab was initiated. Given the patient’s negative symptomatology for GCA, AAON was considered as a possible cause of his vision loss and amiodarone was discontinued in consultation with cardiology.
A subsequent right temporal artery biopsy (TAB) revealed transmural histiocytic inflammatory infiltrate with numerous histiocytes at the level of internal elastic lamina, consistent with GCA (Figure 2). His visual acuity has remained stable throughout the six-months post-discharge follow-up with complete resolution of the bilateral optic disc oedema. Remarkably, the inflammatory markers ESR and CRP remained within normal limits throughout the treatment course, with the ESR being 2 mm/hr and CRP <.3 mg/dL at six-month follow-up.
Figure 2.

Movat pentachrome stain (x40) of the right temporal artery biopsy demonstrating marked fibrointimal proliferation with luminal narrowing. Although the internal elastic lamina (black arrow) is intact, there is medial fibrosis (highlighted in green) (Figure 2a). CD163 immunoperoxidase staining (x40) highlights a transmural histiocytic inflammatory infiltrate with numerous histiocytic aggregates in the media and at the level of the internal elastic lamina (black arrows, Figure 2b). High-power view of CD163 immunohistochemical staining (x200) exhibiting several histiocytes at the level of the refractile internal elastic lamina (black arrow, Figure 2 C)
Discussion
GCA is the most common vasculitis of medium and large vessels in the elderly with an incidence rate of 18.8 (95% CI 15.9–21.6) per 100,000 in one 50-year population-based study from the US.4 Permanent vision loss is a devastating consequence of GCA and was found to afflict 8.2% of GCA sufferers in a retrospective population-based cohort-study, although others have reported much higher rates of irreversible vision loss.5,6 Other ocular pathologies may present similarly to GCA. One such pathology, AAON, develops in approximately 1–2% of patients within the first year of starting amiodarone therapy.7 AAON, a diagnosis of exclusion, is characterised by progressive monocular or binocular vision loss and bilateral optic disc swelling.8 Visual field defects in AAON are varied, ranging from central scotomas to inferior or superior altitudinal defects.9 The temporal relationship of amiodarone initiation to our patient’s subacute vision loss, coupled with his bilateral optic disc oedema and visual field defects, was initially suggestive for AAON.
While the vision loss in AAON arises from a direct retinotoxic effects of amiodarone, vision loss in GCA is primarily due to the arteritic type of anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (A-AION) which results from inflammation of the short posterior ciliary arteries supplying the optic nerve head.5 Inflammation and occlusion of the central retinal artery, ophthalmic artery, and cilioretinal artery have also been reported in GCA.5,6,10 Arteritis of the ophthalmic and posterior ciliary artery-derived penetrating pial branches, which supply the optic nerve sheath, is also speculated to cause the optic nerve sheath enhancement seen on neuroimaging,11 a finding rarely evaluated for in GCA. In the twelve previously reported cases of GCA with optic nerve sheath enhancement on neuroimaging, radiological enhancement was restricted solely to the optic nerve sheath and orbital fat (Table 1).2,12–21 In contrast, optic nerve sheath enhancement is not a recognised feature of AAON, which has poorly studied neuroradiological findings.
Table 1.
Summary of previous GCA cases with optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI
| Author(s) | Age (years) | Sex | Visual Symptoms at Presentation | Imaging Finding(s) | Treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nassani et al., 199521 | 69 | F | Photophobia, diplopia to the right, bilateral retroorbital pain and exophthalmos | Thickening of bilateral optic nerve sheaths | Oral prednisone (50 mg/day) | Improvement of diplopia and exophthalmos. Regression of optic nerve sheath thickening |
| Lee et al., 20012 | 69 | M | Acute binocular vertical diplopia, proptosis, bilateral conjunctival injection, and chemosis | Enhancement of the left extra-ocular muscles, left anterior optic nerve sheath, and right posterior optic nerve sheath | Oral prednisone (100 mg/day) | Resolution of proptosis and diplopia. Resolved optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI |
| Morgenstern et al., 200314 | 83 | M | Vision loss OU | Bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Visual function stabilised |
| Morotti et al., 201315 | 74 | M | Fluctuating diplopia, subacute blurred vision OD, and central scotoma OS | Bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP (1 g/day) followed by oral prednisone taper | Complete blindness with no improvement |
| Reddi &Vollbrach, 201317 | 83 | F | Acute vision loss to hand motion range OU | Left optic nerve sheath enhancement with extension to the surrounding retrobulbar fat | IV solumedrol followed by oral prednisone taper | Some improvement of visual function. Resolved optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI |
| Liu & Chestnutt, 201318 | 83 | F | Vision loss to hand motion range OD | Bilateral perineural enhancement of optic nerves | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Deterioration of visual acuity to NLP OU |
| Liu & Chestnutt, 201318 | 68 | F | Acute blurred vison OS | Perineural enhancement of left optic nerve | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Visual function stabilised |
| Liu & Miller, 201519 | 67 | M | Superior and central visual field loss OS, photopsia | Bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Visual acuity stable OD, but declined to 20/400 OS |
| Emami et al., 201912 | 60 | M | Acute blurred vision OD with inferior field defect OD | Bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement with mild orbital fat stranding | IVMP (1 g/day) followed by oral prednisone taper and methotrexate | Visual function stabilised |
| Pappolla et al., 201916 | 76 | F | Inferior visual field defect OS | Left greater than right optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Residual peripheral visual field defect OS with preservation of central vision. Resolution of optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI |
| Gold et al., 202013 | 71 | M | Subacute vision loss OS and inferonasal field defect OS | Left greater than right optic nerve sheath enhancement with fat stranding | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Resolution of visual field defect and acuity to 20/20 OU. Resolved optic nerve sheath enhancement on MRI |
| Nguyen et., 202020 | 83 | F | Transient diplopia and subacute vision OS | Left greater than right optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper | Visual function stabilised |
| Our Patient | 72 | M | Subacute right greater than left vision loss | Right optic nerve sheath enhancement | IVMP followed by oral prednisone taper and tocilizumab | Visual function stabilised |
IVMP: intravenous methylprednisolone, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, NLP: no light perception, OD: right eye, OS: left eye, OU: both eyes.
Emerging data suggest that optic nerve sheath enhancement is an under-recognised sign of GCA. In one 2016 retrospective case-series of GCA-associated MRI findings, optic nerve sheath enhancement was seen in eight out of fourteen (57%) cases with optic nerve enhancement seen in only five out of the fourteen cases (36%).3,11 A more recent analysis of GCA-associated MRI findings from a tertiary-referral centre found optic nerve sheath enhancement in five out of seven (71%) TAB proven-GCA cases.22 Another 2018 study found bilateral enhancement ‘aside the optic nerve’ in 14 out of 18 (78%) cases from TAB-prove GCA.23 The latter two studies did not report radiological abnormalities of the optic nerve itself. Identifying instances where OPN occurs secondary to GCA has important clinical implications, as initiating an insufficient corticosteroid dose or too rapid a steroid taper might lead to relapse and recurrent visual loss.15,19 To this end, serum ESR, CRP, and a TAB should be considered in every case of OPN in the elderly.
Cases of GCA-associated OPN may often be missed or overlooked as neuroimaging is not generally recommended for diagnosis of arteritic (i.e., GCA) or non-arteritic AION.6,24 Additionally, in patients undergoing emergency room neuroimaging for headache, a non-contrast computed tomography scan is typically the initial imaging study of choice and is usually unremarkable in GCA. Likewise, in elderly patients admitted for stroke evaluation (e.g, acute monocular or bilateral visual loss) a non-contrast MRI of the head with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the next neuroimaging study in the stroke work up.25,26 Unfortunately, the distinctive radiological finding of OPN is unlikely to be seen on a non-contrast, non-fat suppressed orbital MRI. When neuroimaging does show OPN, in the correct clinical context, clinicians should consider GCA in the differential diagnosis. In our case, both clinical and radiological data were needed to make the correct diagnosis and distinguish it from other causes like AAON, highlighting the importance of the clinical-radiological correlation in diagnostic medicine and neuro-ophthalmology.3,27 Ultimately, an orbital MRI could be performed to adjudicate equivocal cases of GCA in the acute setting.
Declaration of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest
References
- 1.Hickman SJ.Optic Perineuritis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0617-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee AG, Tang RA, Feldon SE, et al. Orbital presentations of giant cell arteritis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239(7):509–513. doi: 10.1007/s004170100310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Purvin V, Kawasaki A, Jacobson DM. Optic perineuritis: clinical and radiographic features. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1299–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:264–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen JJ, Leavitt JA, Fang C, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Warrington KJ. Evaluating the incidence of arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy and other causes of vision loss from giant cell arteritis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1999–2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Skanchy DF, Vickers A, Prospero Ponce CM, Lee AG. Ocular manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2019;14:23–32. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mantyjarvi M, Tuppurainen K, Ikaheimo K. Ocular side effects of amiodarone. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:360–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Passman RS, Bennett CL, Purpura JM, et al. Amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy: a critical review. Am J Med. 2012;125(5):447–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Purvin V, Kawasaki A, Borruat F-X. Optic neuropathy in patients using amiodarone. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:696–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman B. Ocular manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(4):509–520. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)80192-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.D’Souza NM, Morgan ML, Almarzouqi SJ, Lee AG. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in giant cell arteritis. Eye (Lond). 2016;30(5):758–762. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Emami S, Howarth D, Margolin E. Giant cell arteritis presenting as bilateral optic perineuritis in an African Man. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020;Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gold DM, Galetta SL. An inflammatory milieu: optic perineuritis, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and giant cell arteritis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(1):1. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morgenstern KE, Ellis BD, Schochet SS, Linberg JV. Bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement from giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:625–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Morotti A, Liberini P, Padovani A. Bilateral optic perineuritis as the presenting feature of giant cell arteritis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013(jan29 1):bcr2011007959. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pappolla A, Silveira F, Norscini J, Miquelini L, Patrucco L. Bilateral optic perineuritis as initial presentation of giant cell arteritis. Neurologist. 2019;24(1):26–28. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reddi S, Vollbracht S. Giant cell arteritis associated with orbital pseudotumor. Headache. 2013;53:1488–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu KC, Chesnutt DA. Perineural optic nerve enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging in giant cell arteritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013;33(3):279–281. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3182915b77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu TY, Miller NR. Giant cell arteritis presenting as unilateral anterior ischemic optic neuropathy associated with bilateral optic nerve sheath enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroophthalmol. 2015;35(4):360–363. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nguyen KK, Al Othman BA, Kini AT, Lee AG. Perineural optic nerve enhancement in giant cell arteritis: a case report and review of the literature. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020;Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nassani S, Cocito L, Arcuri T, Favale E. Orbital pseudotumor as a presenting sign of temporal arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1995;13:367–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gospe SM 3rd, Amrhein TJ, Malinzak MD, Bhatti MT, Mettu P, El-Dairi MA. Magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the optic nerve sheath and intracranial internal carotid artery in giant cell arteritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2019 Oct 8. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000860. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sommer NN, Treitl KM, Coppenrath E, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution black-blood magnetic resonance imaging for detection of arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients with giant cell arteritis. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(11):698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baig IF, Pascoe AR, Kini A, Lee AG. Giant cell arteritis: early diagnosis is key. Eye Brain. 2019;11:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Birenbaum D, Bancroft LW, Felsberg GJ. Imaging in acute stroke. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12:67–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brannan SO, Cheung D, Murray PI, Dewar C, Guest P. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1595–1596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kanamalla US. The optic nerve tram-track sign. Radiology. 2003;227:718–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
