Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2021 Jul 6;49(4):346–354. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2021.1944461

Four Unrecorded Aspergillus Species from the Rhizosphere Soil in South Korea

Jun Won Lee a, Sung Hyun Kim a, Young-Hyun You b, Young Woon Lim a, Myung Soo Park a,
PMCID: PMC8409969  PMID: 34512078

Abstract

The genus Aspergillus is commonly isolated from various marine and terrestrial environments; however, only a few species have been studied in rhizosphere soil. As part of the Korean indigenous fungal excavation project, we investigated fungal diversity from rhizosphere soil, focusing on Aspergillus species. A total of 13 strains were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of three different plants. Based on phylogenetic analysis of β-tubulin and calmodulin and morphological characteristics, we identified five Aspergillus species. A. calidoustus and A. pseudodeflectus were commonly isolated from the rhizosphere soil. Four species were confirmed as unrecorded species in Korea: A. calidoustus, A. dimorphicus, A. germanicus, and A. pseudodeflecuts. The detailed morphological descriptions of these unrecorded species are provided.

Keywords: BenA, CaM, morphology, new records, phylogeny

1. Introduction

Aspergillus is one of the most common fungi in various environments worldwide. Aspergillus is known as plant and human pathogen, mycotoxin producer, and food spoiler. However, it plays important roles in the ecological and industrial systems by producing antibiotics and organic acids, and degrading starches, celluloses, and other polysaccharides [1–5]. Morphological characters such as growth rate, color of the colony, thermotolerance, and size of conidial heads and conidia are known to be important features for initial identification of Aspergillus [6]. However, morphological feature is not enough to recognize species because their morphological characteristics vary by their ecological habitats [6,7]. For accurate identification of Aspergillus, standardized methods including morphology, molecular analysis, and extrolite profiling have been proposed. DNA markers such as the internal transcribed spacer region, calmodulin (CaM), β–tubulin (BenA), and the RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) have been used in Aspergillus identification and phylogeny [8]. According to the current research, the genus consists of six subgenera, 27 sections, and 446 species worldwide [9]. In Korea, 69 Aspergillus species have been reported [10–14]. Although some species have been reported from soil in terrestrial, marine, and clinical environments [15–18], many Aspergillus were isolated from food fermentation such as meju and nuruk [12,19–21]. Nonetheless, study on Aspergillus from rhizosphere soil in Korea is limited [22].

Fungi in rhizosphere environments play an important role in plant growth and adaptation [23,24]. Aspergillus is one of the common fungi in rhizosphere soil [25–31]. Some Aspergillus are known to produce plant promoting chemicals such as gibberellic acid and indole acetic acid [27,28]. Many Aspergillus strains were only identified at the genus level, as previous studies mainly focused on bioactive compounds [27–30]. Therefore, the diversity of Aspergillus in in rhizosphere soil is unclear.

This project is organized by the National Institute of Biological Resources to excavate Korean indigenous fungi from the rhizosphere soil. We explored fungal diversity from rhizosphere soil of various plants; Aspergillus, Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Fusarium were common genera. Recently, we reported on diversity of Penicillium, revealing eight unrecorded species in Korea [32]. The main purpose of this study was to focus on Aspergillus in the rhizosphere of various plants and to identify them based on BenA and CaM loci. We discovered four unrecorded species: A. calidoustus, A. dimorphicus, A. germanicus, and A. pseudodeflectus.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample collections and isolation

Rhizosphere soil of three plants (Calystegia soldanella, Orobanche coerulescens, and Sorbus commixta) were collected from five sites in Korea in 2019 (Table 1). Five grams of soil for each sample was diluted tenfold in sterile water. A 100 µL of each dilute was plated on dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar (DRBC; Difco, Becton Dickinson). All plates were incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Based on morphology, Aspergillus-like strains were transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco, Becton Dickinson) plate. Strains were stored in 20% glycerol at −80 °C at the Seoul National University Fungus Collection (SFC).

Table 1.

The information of Aspergillus strains isolated from rhizosphere soil.

Species Section Strain Location Substrate
A. calidoustusa Usti SFC20191113-NB113 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB116 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB135 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB146, NIBRFG0000509071 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB197, NIBRFG0000509286 Sannae-myeon, Miryang-si, Gyeongsangnam-do Sorbus commixta
A. dimorphicus Cremei SFC20191113-NB100, NIBRFG0000509072 Guryongpo-eup, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Orobanche coerulescens
A. germanicus Usti SFC20191113-NB098, NIBRFG0000509073 Guryongpo-eup, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Orobanche coerulescens
A. insuetus Usti SFC20191113-NB013 Guryongpo-eup, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
A. pseudodeflectus Usti SFC20191113-NB114, NIBRFG0000509074 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB115 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB136 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB156 Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Calystegia soldanella
SFC20191113-NB199, NIBRFG0000509287 Sannae-myeon, Miryang-si, Gyeongsangnam-do Sorbus commixta

aThe unrecorded Aspergillus species in Korea are represented in bold.

2.2. DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from isolated Aspergillus using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction protocol [33]. For the primer sets, Bt2a/Bt2b for BenA and CF1/CF4 or cmd5/cmd6 for CaM, were used [34–36]. PCR was performed in a C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) with previously described methods [37]. The PCR products were purified using the ExpinTM PCR Purification Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea), according to the guideline. DNA sequencing was performed using the PCR primers at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea), using an ABI Prism 3730 genetic analyzer (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

2.3. Phylogenetic analysis

The sequences were assembled, proofread, and aligned using MEGA7 [38] and were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers in Table 2). Hamigera avellanea CBS 295.48 was used as the outgroup [39]. Multiple alignments were performed using the default settings of the Multiple Alignment Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT ver. 7) [40]. Then, each sequence was manually checked and adjusted. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was performed with RAxML [41] implemented on CIPRES web portal [42], using the GTR + GAMMA model of evolution with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Table 2.

Strains used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.

Section of Aspergillus Species Strain GenBank accession no.
BenA CaM
Cremei A. arxii CBS 525.83T MN969365 MN969223
A. brunneouniseriatus NRRL 4273T EF652123 EF652138
A. chaetosartoryae NRRL 5501T EF652117 EF652129
A. chrysellus NRRL 5084T EF652109 EF652136
A. citocrescens CBS 140566T FR775317 LN878969
A. cremeus NRRL 5081T EF652120 EF652125
A. dimorphicus NRRL 3650T EF652111 EF652135
SFC20191113-NB100 MW711172 MW711185
CMV012C9 MK451246 MK451357
NRRL 35052 EU021672 EU021685
A. europaeus CBS 134393T LN909006 LN909007
A. flaschentraegeri NRRL 5042T EF652113 EF652130
A. gorakhpurensis NRRL 3649T EF652114 EF652126
A. inflatus CBS 682.70T FJ531008 FJ531090
A. itaconicus NRRL 161T EF652118 EF652140
A. koreanus EML-GSNP1-1T KX216530 KX216528
A. pulvinus NRRL 5078T EF652121 EF652139
A. stromatoides CBS 500.65T FJ531038 EF652127
A. tardus CBS 433.93T FJ531001 FJ531084
A. wentii NRRL 375T EF652106 EF652131
Usti A. asper CBS 140842T KT698838 KT698839
A. baeticus NRRL 62501T HE615092 HE615117
A. calidoustus CBS 121601T FJ624456 HE616559
SFC20191113-NB113 MW711167 MW711176
SFC20191113-NB116 MW711161 MW711173
SFC20191113-NB135 MW711160 MW711175
SFC20191113-NB146 MW711162 MW711174
SFC20191113-NB197 MW711163 MW711177
E449/MI09 HG931688 HG931695
E460 HG964949 HG964950
A. carlsbadensis IBT 14493T FJ531179 FJ531126
A. collinsii CBS 140843T KT698843 KT698844
A. contaminans CBS 142451T LT594443 LT594425
A. deflectus NRRL 2206T EF652261 EF652349
A. elongatus NRRL 5176T EF652326 EF652414
A. germanicus DTO 27-D9T FJ531172 FJ531141
SFC20191113-NB098 MW711171 MW711184
A. granulosus NRRL 1932T EF652254 EF652342
A. heterothallicus NRRL 5096T EF652323 EF652411
A. insuetus NRRL 279T EF652281 EF652369
A. insuetus SFC20191113-NB013 MW711170 MW711183
A. keveii CBS 209.92T EU076376 EU076365
A. keveioides CBS 132737T JN982694 JN982684
A. lucknowensis NRRL 3491T EF652283 EF652371
A. monodii CBS 435.93T FJ531171 FJ531142
A. porphyreostipitatus DTO 266-D9T KJ775080 KJ775338
A. pseudodeflectus ET1611 KY853416 KY853415
NRRL 6135T EF652331 EF652419
SFC20191113-NB114 MW711169 MW711178
SFC20191113-NB115 MW711166 MW711179
SFC20191113-NB136 MW711168 MW711182
SFC20191113-NB156 MW711164 MW711181
SFC20191113-NB199 MW711165 MW711180
AS3 15308 JN982689 JN982679
NRRL 278 EF652280 EF652368
A. pseudoustus IBT 28161T FJ531168 FJ531129
A. puniceus NRRL 5077T EF652322 EF652410
A. sigurros CMV005I4T MK451066 MK451512
A. thesauricus NRRL 62487T HE615095 HE615120
A. turkensis CBS 504.65T FJ531191 FJ531145
A. ustus NRRL 275T EF652279 EF652367

“T” indicates the ex-type strains.

Sequences produced in this study are presented in bold letters.

2.4. Morphological analysis

Morphological analysis of the four unrecorded species was performed on three different culture media using previously described methods: Czapek yeast autolysate agar (CYA; yeast extract, Difco), malt extract agar (MEA; Oxoid), and yeast extract sucrose agar (YES; yeast extract, Difco). The Methuen Handbook of Color was used for the color names and alphanumeric codes for macromorphological characteristics [43]. The microscopic observation was processed under a light microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using the samples grown on MEA and CYA.

3. Results

3.1. Species identification

A total of 13 Aspergillus strains were isolated from rhizosphere of three plants. Based on the combined dataset of BenA and CaM sequences, they were identified as five species in two sections with four unrecorded species in Korea (Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2). Twelve strains were included in section Usti and were identified as four species: A. calidoustus (5 strains), A. germanicus (1), A. insuetus (1), and A. pseudodeflectus (5). A. calidoustus, A. germanicus, and A. pseudodeflectus were unrecorded species in Korea. For section Cremei, one strain was discovered and identified as A. dimorphicus, which was unrecorded species in Korea.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Aspergillus sect. Cremei based on the combined data set of BenA and CaM sequences. Bootstrap values >70 are presented at the nodes. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. “T” indicates the ex-type strains. Aspergillus reported in this study are represented in bold. The unrecorded Aspergillus species are accented in color box.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Aspergillus sect. Usti based on the combined data set of BenA and CaM sequences. Bootstrap values >70 are presented at the nodes. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. “T” indicates the ex-type strains. Aspergillus reported in this study are represented in bold. The unrecorded Aspergillus species are accented in color box.

A. calidoustus and A. pseudodeflectus were commonly isolated from the rhizosphere soil (Table 1). Aspergillus diversity was higher in rhizosphere soil of Calytegia soldanella compared to others. Although A. pseudodeflectus was commonly isolated from C. soldanella and Sorbus commixta, generally, the Aspergillus diversity was found unique for each plant.

3.2. Taxonomy

Aspergillus calidoustus Varga, Houbraken, & Samson (2008)

Description: Colony diameter, at 25 °C for 7 days, in mm: CYA 50–51; CYA 15 °C 12–13; CYA 30 °C 60–66; CYA 37 °C 8–12; MEA 51–54; YES 50–51 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The unrecorded Aspergillus species in Korea: A. calidoustus (SFC20191113-NB146), A. dimorphicus (SFC20191113-NB100), A. germanicus (SFC20191113-NB098) and A. pseudodeflectus (SFC20191113-NB114). (a–c) Colonies grown on Czapek yeast autolysate agar (CYA), malt extract agar (MEA), and yeast extract sucrose agar (YES) from left to right (top = obverse, bottom = reverse). (d–f): Conidiophores; (g) Conidia (scale bar = 10 μm).

Colonies on CYA, lightly sulcate, moderate to good sporulation, floccose, greenish gray (27D2) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin, exudate brownish orange (6D8) to dark brown (6F8) droplets, soluble pigment absent, reverse color olive brown (4D3) at center and light yellow (1A4) elsewhere. Colonies on MEA, lightly sulcate, moderate sporulation, velvety with floccose at center, central part gray (27B1) at center and greenish gray (27E2) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin, no exudates, soluble pigment absent, reverse color olive brown (4E4) and orange yellow (4B8) elsewhere. Colonies on YES, lightly sulcate, moderated sporulation, central floccose, gray (3C1) to yellowish gray (3C2) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin, no exudates, soluble pigment light yellow (3A4), reverse color olive (3D3) to yellow (3A7).

Conidiophores biseriate with thick, smooth-walled, brown, (2.4–) 3.3 (–4.9) µm wide; vesicles pyriform to broadly spathulate, (8.6–) 9.3 × 9.8 (–10.5) µm; conidial heads loosely columnar; metulae covering the upper half to three-fourths of upper surface, (3.1–) 4.3 × 5.6 (–7.1) µm; phialides (2.8–) 3.2 × 5.4 (–6.7) µm; conidia rough walls, inner and outer wall visible, globose, (3.2–) 3.6 to 3.7 (–4.1) µm.

Strains examined: SFC20191113-NB113, SFC20191113-NB116, SFC20191113-NB135, SFC20191113-NB146, and SFC20191113-NB197

Remarks:A. calidoustus is morphologically similar to A. pseudodeflectus and A. ustus. A. calidoustus was able to grow at 37 °C, but A. ustus was not [44]. A. calidoustus can be distinguished from A. pseudodeflectus by narrow margin and moderate or good sporulation in CYA.

Aspergillus dimorphicus B.S. Mehrotra & R. Prasad (1969)

Description: Colony diameter, at 25 °C for 7 days, in mm: CYA 40–43; CYA 15 °C 10–12; CYA 30 °C 37–39; No growth at CYA 37 °C; MEA 30–31; YES 74–75 (Figure 3).

Colonies on CYA, moderately sulcate, moderate sporulation, floccose, yellowish gray (3C2) at center, pastel yellow (3A5) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin exudates yellowish white (3A2), soluble pigment absent, reverse color yellowish white (2A2). Colonies on MEA, lightly sulcate, moderate sporulation, floccose, pastel yellow (3A4) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin, exudates yellowish white (3A2), soluble pigment absent, reverse color light orange (5A5). Colonies on YES, lightly sulcate, good sporulation, floccose, olive yellow (3D6) elsewhere with 1 mm white margin, no exudates, soluble pigment absent, reverse color pastel yellow (3A4).

Conidiophores biseriate with smooth-walled, sinuous, light yellow, (3.7–) 4.4 (–6.1) µm wide; vesicles mostly globose to subglobose, (8.0–) 9.9 × 10.3 (–13.4) µm; conidial heads globose to loosely radiate, phialides (3.0–) 3.6 × 9.6 (–11.5) µm; conidia subglobose to globose with rough wall, 3.5 to 4.7 µm.

Strain examined: SFC20191113-NB100

Remarks:A. dimorphicus is morphologically similar to A. wentii, it can be distinguished from A. wentii by branched conidiophore with two vesicles [45].

Aspergillus germanicus Varga, Frisvad & Samson (2011)

Description: Colony diameter, at 25 °C for 7 days, in mm: CYA 42–43; CYA 15 °C 13–14; CYA 30 °C 47–48; CYA 37 °C 8–9; MEA 40–42; YES 45–48 (Figure 3).

Colonies on CYA, poor sporulation, floccose, orange gray (6B2) to white (26C1) at center, no exudates, soluble pigment yellowish gray (3B2), reverse color brownish gray (4E4) to pale yellow at margin (3A3). Colonies on MEA, poor sporulation, velvety, white, no exudates, soluble pigment absent, reverse color orange (5A7). Colonies on YES, poor sporulation, floccose to velvety, central part color white to grayish yellow (4B4) to white at center, no exudates, soluble pigment pale yellow (3A3), reverse color grayish orange (5B4) at center and grayish yellow (3C4) and light yellow (3A5).

Conidiophores biseriate with thick, smooth-walled, brown, (3.7–) 4.7 (–5.4) µm wide; vesicles septulate, (8.5–) 10.1 × 10.3 (–12.4) µm; conidial heads loosely columnar; metulae covering the upper half to three-fourths of upper surface, (2.3–) 3.2 × 5.2 (–5.8) µm; phialides (2.3–) 2.7 × 5.0 (–6.1) µm; conidia globose with brown smooth wall, (2.8–) 3.1 to 3.4 (–3.9) µm.

Strain examined: SFC20191113-NB098

Remarks:A. germanicus is morphologically similar to A. thesauricus, it can be distinguished from A. thesauricus by growth at 37 °C, thicker conidiophore, and smaller vesicle diameter [46].

Aspergillus pseudodeflectus Samson & Mouchacca (1975)

Description: Colony diameter, at 25 °C for 7 days, in mm: CYA 49–51; CYA 15 °C 10–13; CYA 30 °C 57–59; CYA 37 °C 14–18; MEA 47–48; YES 52–54 (Figure 3).

Colonies on CYA, lightly sulcate, poor to moderate sporulation, floccose, grayish orange (5B3) at center and white elsewhere, exudates dark brown (8F4), soluble pigment pale yellow (3A3), reverse color olive (3D3) at center and light yellow (2A5) elsewhere. Colonies on MEA, moderately sulcate, poor to moderate sporulation, floccose, brownish gray (5C2) and white at margin, no exudates, soluble pigment absent, reverse color brown (6E5) and golden yellow at margin (5B7). Colonies on YES, radially sulcate and wrinkled at center, poor to moderate sporulation, floccose, yellowish gray (4B2) and white at margin, no exudates, soluble pigment pale yellow (3A3), reverse color deep yellow (4A8).

Conidiophores biseriate with short, curved, rough-walled, brown, (3.4–) 3.9 (–4.2) µm wide; vesicles globose to clavate, (6.7–) 7.9 × 9.5 (–10.5) µm; conidial heads brown, radiate; metulae more or less cylindrical, (2.4–) 3.6 × 4.6 (–5.4) µm; phialides (2.8–) 3.4 × 6.4 (–8.1) µm; conidia globose to ellipsoidal with thick-walled, brown, rough wall, (3.3–) 3.7 to 4.5 (–5.3) µm.

Strains examined: SFC20191113-NB114, SFC20191113-NB115, SFC20191113-NB136, SFC20191113-NB156, and SFC20191113-NB199

Remarks:A. pseudodeflectus is morphologically similar to A. calidoustus. A. pseudodeflectus can be distinguished from A. calidoustus by wide margin and poor sporulation in CYA.

4. Discussion

The rhizosphere soil is a complex and dynamic environment that provides a close relationship between plants and microbes. A total of 13 Aspergillus strains were isolated from rhizosphere soil of three plants and were identified as five species in two sections including four unrecorded species based on BenA and CaM sequences. Although 12 species in Aspergillus section Fumigati have been reported from arable soil [17], many previous studies only focused on limited environments, such as meju and nuruk [12,19–21]. Only Aspergillus terreus has previously been reported from rhizosphere soil of paprika plants in Korea [47]. Five additional species (A. calidoustus, A. dimorphicus, A. germaincus, A. insuetus, and A. pseudodeflectus) are reported for the first time in this study, from the rhizosphere soil in Korea.

Four species were unrecorded in Korea: A. calidoustus, A. dimorphicus, A. germanicus, and A. pseudodeflectus. A. calidoustus is commonly found in clinical environments, indoor air, and forest soil [44,48,49]. It has been isolated from Acanthospermum austral and is known for its antifungal and cytotoxic activity [50]. In this study, A. calidoustus was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Calystegia soldanella and Sorbus commixta. A. pseudodeflectus was previously isolated from desert soil and seaweed [51,52]. It produced pseudodeflectusin, which exhibited cytotoxic activity [51]. In this study, A. pseudodeflectus strains were isolated from rhizosphere soil of Calystegia soldanella and Sorbus commixta. The A. pseudodeflectus strains isolated from Korea exhibited faster growth on YES compared to the other reported strains [53,54]. Some fungi isolated from different environments exhibit different metabolism and growth rates due to environment adaptation [55,56]. A. germanicus was first isolated from indoor air, but there are few reports of the species so far [57]. In this study, A. germanicus was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Orobanche coerulescens. Our study is the first report of the species from rhizosphere soil. A. dimorphicus was isolated from garden soil, loess soil, and deep-sea sediment [58–61]. A. dimorphicus showed antitumor activities [62] and proteolytic activities [63]. A. dimorphicus strain was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Orobanche coerulescens in this study.

Aspergillus species are well known for their potential for usage in industrial and medical compounds, but many strains remain at the genus level. Therefore, we believe that our study will provide the basis for the discovery of new compound based on accurate identification of Aspergillus. Although many Aspergillus species have been found in rhizosphere soils using the NGS method [64–66], the role of Aspergillus in rhizosphere soil is unclear. To understand the interaction between Aspergillus and plants, further studies are needed to investigate the function of Aspergillus in rhizosphere soil.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea [grant number NIBR202002104 and NIBR202102107].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Planchot V, Colonna P, Gallant DJ, et al. Extensive degradation of native starch granules by alpha-amylase from Aspergillus fumigatus. J Cereal Sci. 1995;21(2):163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hrmová M, Biely P, Vrs˘Anská M.. Cellulose-and xylan-degrading enzymes of Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1989;11(9):610–616. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Vries RP, Visser J.. Aspergillus enzymes involved in degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65(4):497–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scheckermann C, Wagner F, Fischer L.. Galactosylation of antibiotics using the β-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1997;20(8):629–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang L, Lübeck M, Lübeck PS.. Aspergillus as a versatile cell factory for organic acid production. Fungal Biol Rev. 2017;31(1):33–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Geiser DM, Klich MA, Frisvad JC, et al. The current status of species recognition and identification in Aspergillus. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balajee SA, Houbraken J, Verweij PE, et al. Aspergillus species identification in the clinical setting. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:39–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Samson RA, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, et al. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud Mycol. 2014;78:141–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Houbraken J, Kocsubé S, Visagie CM, et al. Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): an overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species. Stud Mycol. 2020;95:5–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim HJ, Kim JS, Cheon KH, et al. Species list of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces in Korea, Based on one fungus one name system. Kor J Mycol. 2016;44(4):207–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oh JY, Mannaa M, Han GD, et al. First report of Aspergillus awamori as a fungal pathogen of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Crop Prot. 2016;85:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim KM, Lim J, Lee JJ, et al. Characterization of Aspergillus sojae isolated from meju, Korean traditional fermented soybean brick. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27(2):251–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nguyen TT, Pangging M, Bangash NK, et al. Five new records of the family Aspergillaceae in Korea, Aspergillus europaeus, A. pragensis, A. tennesseensis, Penicillium fluviserpens, and P. scabrosum. Mycobiology. 2020;48(2):81–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.National List of Species of Korea . 2019. National Institute of Biological Resources. [Internet] [cited 2021 Mar 5]. Available from: http://kbr.go.kr.
  • 15.Kim JD.Keratinolytic activity of five Aspergillus species isolated from poultry farming soil in Korea. Mycobiology. 2003;31(3):157–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim DH, Kim SH, Kim YK, et al. Reidentification of Aspergillus spp. isolated from clinical specimens of patients suspected as pulmonary aspergillosis in Korea. Korean J Med Mycol. 2009;14(3):133–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hong SB, Kim DH, Park IC, et al. Isolation and identification of Aspergillus section Fumigati strains from arable soil in Korea. Mycobiology. 2010;38(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee S, Park MS, Lim YW.. Diversity of marine-derived Aspergillus from tidal mudflats and sea sand in Korea. Mycobiology. 2016;44(4):237–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hong SB, Lee M, Kim DH, et al. Aspergillus cibarius sp. nov., from traditional meju in Korea. J Microbiol. 2012;50(4):712–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang S, Choi SJ, Kwak J, et al. Aspergillus oryzae strains isolated from traditional Korean nuruk: fermentation properties and influence on rice wine quality. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2013;22(2):425–432. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim HR, Kim JH, Bai DH, et al. Identification and characterization of useful fungi with α-amylase activity from the Korean traditional nuruk. Mycobiology. 2011;39(4):278–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hong SB, Shin HD, Hong J, et al. New taxa of Neosartorya and Aspergillus in Aspergillus section Fumigati. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;93(1-2):87–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coats VC, Rumpho ME.. The rhizosphere microbiota of plant invaders: an overview of recent advances in the microbiomics of invasive plants. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ehrmann J, Ritz K.. Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant Soil. 2014;376(1-2):1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wijeratne EK, Turbyville TJ, Zhang Z, et al. Cytotoxic constituents of Aspergillus terreus from the rhizosphere of Opuntia versicolor of the Sonoran Desert. J Nat Prod. 2003;66(12):1567–1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jain R, Saxena J, Sharma V.. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by Aspergillus awamori S19 isolated from rhizosphere soil of a semi-arid region. Ann Microbiol. 2012;62(2):725–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Islam S, Akanda AM, Sultana F, et al. Chilli rhizosphere fungus Aspergillus spp. PPA1 promotes vegetative growth of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants upon root colonisation. Arch Phytopathol. 2014;47(10):1231–1238. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pandya ND, Desai PV, Jadhav HP, et al. Plant growth promoting potential of Aspergillus sp. NPF7, isolated from wheat rhizosphere in South Gujarat, India. Environ Sustain. 2018;1(3):245–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.He W, Xu Y, Fu P, et al. Cytotoxic indolyl diketopiperazines from the Aspergillus sp. GZWMJZ-258, endophytic with the medicinal and edible plant Garcinia multiflora. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(38):10660–10666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Orfali R, Perveen S.. Secondary metabolites from the Aspergillus sp. in the rhizosphere soil of Phoenix dactylifera (Palm tree). BMC Chem. 2019;13(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tavakol Noorabadi M, Babaeizad V, Zare R, et al. Isolation, Molecular identification, and mycotoxin production of Aspergillus species isolated from the rhizosphere of sugarcane in the South of Iran. Toxins. 2020;12(2):122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Park MS, Lee JW, Kim SH, et al. Penicillium from rhizosphere soil in terrestrial and coastal environments in South Korea. Mycobiology. 2020;48(6):431–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rogers SO, Bendich AJ.. Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi. In: Gelvin S, Schilperoort R, editors. Plant molecular biology manual. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glass NL, Donaldson GC.. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(4):1323–1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hong SB, Go SJ, Shin HD, et al. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Mycologia. 2005;97(6):1316–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peterson SW, Vega FE, Posada F, et al. Penicillium coffeae, a new endophytic species isolated from a coffee plant and its phylogenetic relationship to P. fellutanum, P. thiersii and P. brocae based on parsimony analysis of multilocus DNA sequences. Mycologia. 2005;97(3):659–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Park MS, Lee S, Oh SY, et al. Diversity and enzyme activity of Penicillium species associated with macroalgae in Jeju Island. J Microbiol. 2016;54(10):646–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K.. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Visagie CM, Hirooka Y, Tanney JB, et al. Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces isolated from house dust samples collected around the world. Stud Mycol. 2014;78:63–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Katoh K, Standley DM.. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stamatakis A.RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(21):2688–2690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Paper presented at: SC10 workshop on gateway computing environments (GCE10), New Orleans, LA; 2010. p. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kornerup A, Wanscher JH.. Methuen handbook of colour. 3rd ed. London: Methuen; 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Varga J, Houbraken J, Van Der Lee HA, et al. Aspergillus calidoustus sp. nov., causative agent of human infections previously assigned to Aspergillus ustus. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7(4):630–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Peterson SW.Phylogenetic analysis of Aspergillus sections Cremei and Wentii, based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res. 1995;99(11):1349–1355. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Novakova A, Hubka V, Saiz-Jimenez C, et al. Aspergillus baeticus sp. nov. and Aspergillus thesauricus sp. nov., two species in section Usti from Spanish caves. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62(Pt 11):2778–2785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yoo SJ, Shin DJ, Won HY, et al. Aspergillus terreus JF27 promotes the growth of tomato plants and induces resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Mycobiology. 2018;46(2):147–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Slack GJ.Identification of secondary metabolites from some Eurotium species, Aspergillus insuetus and A. calidoustus from Canadian homes. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.dos Reis Celestino J, de Carvalho LE, da Paz Lima M, et al. Bioprospecting of Amazon soil fungi with the potential for pigment production. Process Biochem. 2014;49(4):569–575. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rodrigues de Carvalho C, Vieira MDLA, Cantrell CL, et al. Biological activities of ophiobolin K and 6-epi-ophiobolin K produced by the endophytic fungus Aspergillus calidoustus. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30(4):478–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Samson RA, Mouchacca J.. Additional notes on species of Aspergillus, Eurotium and Emericella from Egyptian desert soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1975;41(3):343–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ogawa A, Murakami C, Kamisuki S, et al. Pseudodeflectusin, a novel isochroman derivative from Aspergillus pseudodeflectus a parasite of the sea weed, Sargassum fusiform, as a selective human cancer cytotoxin. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;14(13):3539–3543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Houbraken J, Due M, Varga J, et al. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus section Usti. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:107–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Romero SM, Comerio RM, Barrera VA, et al. Aspergillus fuscicans (Aspergillaceae, Eurotiales), a new species in section Usti from Argentinean semi-arid soil. Phytotaxa. 2018;343(1):67–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bidochka MJ, Menzies FV, Kamp AM.. Genetic groups of the insect-pathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana are associated with habitat and thermal growth preferences. Arch Microbiol. 2002;178(6):531–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Baakza A, Vala AK, Dave BP, et al. A comparative study of siderophore production by fungi from marine and terrestrial habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2004;311(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Samson RA, Varga J, Meijer M, et al. New taxa in Aspergillus section Usti. Stud Mycol. 2011;69(1):81–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mehrotra B, Prasad R.. Aspergillus dimorphicus and Emericella cleisto-minuta spp. nov. from Indian soils. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1969;52(2):331–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tuthill DE, Christensen M.. Aspergillus sepultus, a new species in the Aspergillus ochraceus group. Mycologia. 1986;78(3):475–477. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Deshmukh SK, Prakash V, Ranjan N.. Marine fungi: a source of potential anticancer compounds. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Visagie CM, Houbraken J.. Updating the taxonomy of Aspergillus in South Africa. Stud Mycol. 2020;95:253–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xu R, Xu GM, Li XM, et al. Characterization of a newly isolated marine fungus Aspergillus dimorphicus for optimized production of the anti-tumor agent wentilactones. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(11):7040–7054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rodarte MP, Dias DR, Vilela DM, et al. Proteolytic activities of bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi isolated from coffee fruit (Coffea arabica L.). Acta Sci Agron. 2011;33(3):457–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Noor SO, Al-Zahrani DA, Hussein RM, et al. Assessment of fungal diversity in soil rhizosphere associated with Rhazya stricta and some desert plants using metagenomics. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202(9):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pattnaik SS, Busi S.. Rhizospheric fungi: diversity and potential biotechnological applications, in recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi. In: Yadav A, Mishra S, Singh S, Gupta A, editors. Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi. Fungal biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 63–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wu N, Li Z, Wu F, et al. Microenvironment and microbial community in the rhizosphere of dioecious Populus cathayana at Chaka Salt Lake. J Soils Sediments. 2019;19(6):2740–2751. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES