Skip to main content
Journal of General and Family Medicine logoLink to Journal of General and Family Medicine
letter
. 2021 Mar 15;22(5):304–305. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.434

Three comments on the methodology of a hypothermia study

Yuki Tachibana 1,, Kazuoki Inoue 2, Shin Yoshida 3, Kentaro Kinjo 4, Daisuke Kato 5, Yuki Kataoka 6
PMCID: PMC8411409  PMID: 34485003

To the Editor,

With great interest, we read this study, which identified predictors of mortality caused by hypothermia in Japan1. The prognostic factors of hypothermia in Japan are unknown, and the high incidence and mortality of the condition in the elderly have prompted this study2. However, we have three concerns about its methodology.

First, the study included patients who had a cardiac arrest and those who died in the emergency room (ER), which may be reverse causality. In other words, cardiac arrest or death shortly after entering the ER may have resulted in hypothermia. This inclusion criterion would increase the C‐statistics of the in‐hospital mortality prediction score because the near‐death state would contribute not only to hypothermia but also to lower arterial pressure and higher creatinine levels.

Second, the study did not state to what extent the C‐statistics changed upon adjusting the cutoff value and reducing the number of adjustment variables from five to three. The accuracy of these three adjustment variables before altering the cutoff values3 and, if possible, the results of the analysis after adjusting for optimism should be included in the study4 to provide useful information to the readers.

Finally, the small sample size may be a statistical limitation. We are concerned about the possibility of overfitting by using five variables. In other words, since the main outcome was the 17 deaths, conducting logistic regression analysis using multiple explanatory variables may be inappropriate5.

We believe that the in‐hospital mortality score arrived at in this study will be more useful to several hospitalists if these three perspectives are considered.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Not applicable.

Tachibana Y, Inoue K, Yoshida S, Kinjo K, Kato D, Kataoka Y. Three comments on the methodology of a hypothermia study. J Gen Fam Med. 2021;22:304–305. 10.1002/jgf2.434

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ishimaru N, Kinami S, Shimokawa T, Seto H, Kanzawa Y. Hypothermia in a Japanese subtropical climate: retrospective validation study of severity score and mortality prediction. J Gen Fam Med. 2020;21(4):134–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Okada Y, Matsuyama T, Morita S, Ehara N, Miyamae N, Jo T, et al. Prognostic factors for patients with accidental hypothermia: a multi‐institutional retrospective cohort study. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(4):565–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM, TRIPOD Group . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) the TRIPOD statement. Circulation. 2015;131(2):211–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of General and Family Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES