Abstract
Focal Cortical Dysplasia (FCD) is the most common cause of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy in children and young adults. The diagnosis of currently defined FCD subtypes relies on a histopathological assessment of surgical brain tissue. The many ongoing challenges in the diagnosis of FCD and their various subtypes mandate, however, continuous research and consensus agreement to develop a reliable classification scheme. Advanced neuroimaging and genetic studies have proven to augment the diagnosis of FCD subtypes and should be considered for an integrated clinico‐pathological and molecular classification. In this review, we will discuss the histopathological foundation of the current FCD classification and potential advancements when using genetic analysis of somatic brain mutations in neurosurgically resected brain specimens and postprocessing of presurgical neuroimaging data. Combining clinical, imaging, histopathology, and molecular studies will help to define the disease spectrum better and finally unveil FCD‐specific treatment options.
Keywords: brain, epilepsy, neuroimaging, neuropathology, seizure
Short abstract
The ILAE classification of Focal Cortical Dysplasia is widely used in clinical practice and research. Diagnostic liability of FCD subtypes remain, however, challenging. Increasing discovery of brain somatic mutations may help to develop a genotype‐phenotype classification scheme for FCD.
1. INTRODUCTION
Focal Cortical Dysplasia (FCD) is the most common cause of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy in children and young adults (1). Surgical therapy became a successful option in many patients with FCD (2), in particular, when the lesion is visible on MRI and it co‐localizes with the seizure onset zone. Advanced MRI protocols and postprocessing analyses methods have led to a higher presurgical detection rate of FCD (3). However, any presurgical diagnosis needs a histopathological confirmation by microscopic review of the surgical tissue specimen. With advanced genetic tools and increased sequencing coverage, analysis of surgical brain tissues reveals brain somatic mutations in the mTOR pathway in approximately 60% of FCD (4). These developments will help to reach a next level of integrated genotype–phenotype diagnosis, as it is already routine practice in brain tumors.
The ILAE consensus classification scheme for FCD specifies three FCD categories based on architectural (e.g., FCD Type 1), cytoarchitectural (e.g., FCD Type 2), and associated principal lesion patterns (e.g., FCD Type 3), and is widely used in clinical practice and research (5). Microscopic hallmarks were currently defined on routine H&E stainings and refer to the aberrant architectural organization of the neocortex (Figure 1). However, many of these neuroanatomical features, including cytological abnormalities of large pyramidal cells, can also be observed in a non‐epileptic human brain (Figure 2). Therefore, it is ever helpful to have independent scientific confirmation of a specific lesion pattern, that is, using molecular studies or animal modeling, to define the disease and further investigate the best therapeutic options.
In daily routine histopathological evaluation of brain tissue obtained from epilepsy surgery, we encounter a large number of difficult‐to‐diagnose specimens and disease patterns scientifically not yet understood. Characteristic examples represent the spectrum of mild malformations of cortical development (mMCD), FCD Type 1, or no lesion cases with gliosis only. New entities are continuously described within this spectrum, such as mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE) (6) and of low‐grade brain tumors (7, 8). However, the clinical significance of such new entities remains to be shown. The increasing revelation of genetic drivers associated with specific lesion patterns is very helpful to advance this field, as it offers new pharmaco‐therapeutic targets. The development of DNA methylation profiling in human brain diseases, in particular brain tumors has been another illuminating methodology to help clarify the clinico‐pathological and molecularly defined disease entities (9, 10).
We propose, therefore, to work toward a reliable genotype–phenotype correlation of well‐characterized FCD categories as they have the propensity for predominant patterns of anatomo‐pathological brain localization, age at disease onset, and molecular signatures. A typical example is that of the recently described bottom‐of‐sulcus FCD Type 2, which is predominantly localized in the frontal lobe (in particular in the superior frontal sulcus). Patients present early with stereotyped hypermotor seizures, and many of these lesions can be associated with mTOR pathway gain‐of‐function mutations (11, 12). Patients with MOGHE, which is predominantly localized also in the frontal lobe, exhibit early seizure onset and the lesion is frequently associated with somatic brain mutations in the SLC35A2 gene (13). In contrast, genetic studies have not yet deciphered a frequent abnormality in FCD 1 subtypes, which also pose major challenges to routine histopathology diagnosis. DNA methylation patterns can distinguish, however, the FCD 1A subtype from most other FCD variants (see Figure 1A; Holthausen et al, unpublished data). We are confident that the catalog of clinico‐pathologically and molecularly defined FCD subtypes will continuously expand, enabling early diagnosis in these difficult patients and lead to the development of targeted treatment options. We will continue this discussion by presenting case vignettes for clinico‐pathologically and molecularly well characterized FCD 2A and FCD 3D subtypes from our own clinical practice.
1.1. Case vignette 1: A 50‐year‐old patient with a MRI‐positive FCD 2A and a DEPDC5 germline mutation
We report on a 50‐year‐old male patient with seizure onset at the age of 8 years. He suffered from six to eight focal motor seizures with impaired awareness per month. His son also had seizures. Brain MRI at age 36 was reported as normal. Upon repeated imaging, a subtle area of abnormal gyral pattern, and cortical thickening with no transmantle sign and no hyperintense fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal in the right frontal region was observed (Figure 3A,B). During the presurgical evaluation, this patient had stereo‐EEG recordings. A consensus agreement was reached at the patient management conference to offer a right frontal resection. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimens from the frontal lobe revealed an unlayered neocortex consisting of large and dysmorphic neurons (Figure 3C–E). Immunohistochemical stainings using NeuN (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) and non‐phosphorylated neurofilament (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) confirmed the dysplastic nature of cortical pyramidal cells (Figure 3). FCD gene panel testing of MTOR, AKT1, AKT3, PIK3CA, PIK3R2, DEPDC5, TSC1, TSC2, NPRL2, NPRL3, PTEN, BRAF, and SLC35A2 detected a DEPDC5 germline mutation (c.2620C>T, p.Arg874*) in fresh‐frozen brain tissue (from frontal lobe) and paired peripheral blood samples. The patient is seizure‐free 4 years after surgery (Engel class I).
This case highlights a frequent obstacle in clinical practice for the diagnosis of FCD. Several MRIs were performed on this patient and reported negative. This is probably one of the most frequent causes for the exclusion (or at least significant delay) of some patients from surgical consideration. When the patient was finally seen in an epilepsy center, he was 50 years old and suffered from a 42‐year long disease history. Large FCD lesions, particularly those with a clear hyperintense signal on FLAIR images, are easily detected by MRI; however, routine MRIs often miss subtle FCD lesions (14). The frequency of negative MRI in patients with FCD later diagnosed by postoperative histopathology varies considerably depending on the MRI machine used (magnetic field strength and type of head coil), the acquisition protocol, clinical and EEG information, and the experience of the examiner (3, 14, 15, 16). 7T MRI may provide additional information about FCD lesions in patients with or without lesions detected by 1.5 or 3T MRI (15, 17, 18, 19). The increased signal‐to‐noise ratio and susceptibility effects, allowing for better image contrast, higher spatial resolution, and stronger susceptibility contrast, may detect FCD lesions in 16%–32% of previously negative MRI patients (18). Moreover, technical difficulties such as inhomogeneity in 7T images pose challenges for its clinical use (17). In clinical practice, image reconstruction methods and postprocessing from 3D acquisitions with an optimized epilepsy protocol allow better detection of discrete FCD lesions from both 1.5 and 3T MRI (3, 14). Re‐examination of “normal” MRI images in patients with hypometabolism on positron emission tomography with [18F]‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG‐PET) in the light of clinical and EEG information may reveal initially undetected subtle FCD lesions (14).
In patients with FCD Type 1, the MRIs are frequently normal or show diffuse or localized cerebral hypoplasia (20). The main MRI features of FCD Type 2, in general, are focal cortical thickening and a mild degree of increased cortical signal intensity in T2‐weighted and FLAIR sequences, blurring of the gray–white matter junction, focal abnormal cortical gyration, and cerebrospinal fluid cleft‐cortical dimple (14, 21, 22). The presence of hyperintense T2‐FLAIR signal in the subcortical white matter with a wedge shape that extends to the ipsilateral ventricle surface (transmantle sign) is a reliable indicator of FCD Type 2B, although not all patients with FCD 2B have a transmantle sign (22, 23, 24). Thus, except for the presence of transmantle sign, the MRI features of FCD 2A and 2B may be indistinguishable. The MRI characteristics in patients with MOGHE are age‐related and seem to change with brain maturation, and include changes in gyral and sulcal morphology, mild cortical thickening, a slight increase in signal intensity in the subcortical white matter, and a mild cortical–subcortical blurring (6, 25, 26, 27). Young children may present with an extensive and pronounced cortical–subcortical blurring that gives a false impression of cortical thickening.(26)
The first DEDPC5 mutation was reported in a series of patients with familial focal epilepsy in 2013 and soon confirmed in other pedigrees (28, 29, 30). It has been confirmed in many other studies and in particular in FCD 2A (31). It has been shown to represent a loss‐of‐function mutation in the GATOR complex DEPDC5 and likely contain a second‐hit brain somatic abnormality, such as a loss of heterozygosity (4, 31). In order to maximize the utility of various studies in patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy and suspected FCD, we propose that an integration of the various findings in a genotype–phenotype classification (Table 1) will enhance the diagnostic accuracy and help to better stratify patients for research trials and clinical management.
TABLE 1.
Neuroimaging findings | A subtle lesion in the right frontal region, characterized by abnormal gyral pattern, cortical thickening, no transmantle sign, and no hyperintense signal |
Histopathology | Neocortical dyslamination with dysmorphic neurons, no balloon cells (SMI32 and vimentin immunohistochemistry) |
ILAE classification 2011 | FCD Type 2A |
Molecular‐genetic findings | DEPDC5 germline mutation (c.2620C>T, p.Arg874*) in fresh‐frozen brain tissue and paired peripheral blood samples |
Integrated diagnosis | MRI‐positive Focal Cortical Dysplasia 2A, DEPDC5 germline mutation |
FCD ILAE Type 2 represents the most common malformations of cortical development (MCD) in surgical series (1) and is associated with favorable surgical outcomes (2). This FCD type was first described by Taylor and colleagues in 1971 (32) as a distinctive isolated malformation in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Over the past decades, particular attention has been focused on the characteristics of dysmorphic neurons (DN) and balloon cells (BC). Lower overall neuronal densities were observed in the region of dysplasia, and DN displayed variable expression of different cortical layer markers regardless of their laminar location, reflecting their altered migratory pattern, whereas their immunophenotype supports an origin from radial glia and intermediate progenitor cells (33). BC have been shown to express both neuronal and immature glial markers, indicating a failure to differentiate prior to migration into the cortex (34, 35, 36). Several studies using in vitro electrophysiological recording in surgical specimens from patients with FCD Type 2B have shown that BC are essentially electrically silent, whereas neurons display hyper‐excitable intrinsic membrane properties (37, 38). There is also a substantial amount of data demonstrating the persistence of immature features (39), suggesting, in particular, a deregulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission involving altered γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA)‐A‐mediated currents (40). Interestingly, enrichment of somatic variants of the mTOR pathway has been shown in both DN and BC using advanced laser microdissection or single‐cell DNA sequencing techniques (4, 41).
The pathological features of FCD Type 2 are complex, also involving glial cells, including both oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. White matter pathology with depleted myelin and oligodendroglia represents another major feature of FCD Type 2, indicating impaired oligodendroglial turnover and maturation. Morphological abnormal astroglial cells are often observed in the region of dysplasia, and mounting evidence supports the role of dysfunctional astrocytes (astrogliopathology) in the pathophysiological processes underlying the development of epilepsy. Astrocytes, together with microglial cells highly represented in the FCD Type 2 lesion, also contribute to the induction of major pro‐inflammatory signaling pathways, associated with alterations in the blood–brain barrier and extracellular matrix organization (42, 43, 44). Moreover, FCD Type 2 is also characterized by a prominent activation of adaptive immunity mechanisms involving T‐lymphocytes (43, 45, 46).
Thus, the rapidly expanding knowledge of the complex cellular and molecular features of FCD Type 2 and their mechanistic link to somatic mutations in mTOR pathway regulatory genes underlies the need to improve the diagnostic workup of this FCD type, requiring a multilayer comprehensive diagnostic approach that combines clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular‐genetic characteristics. However, the variable mutation level within the lesion (with often low‐level mosaic mutations) is one of the challenges that we are currently facing in the effort to apply the concept of “integrated diagnosis” to FCD Type 2. Highly standardized tissue processing using representative brain tissue enriched in DN and BC‐derived DNA is required for the genetic diagnosis of FCD Type 2 (4, 47).
1.2. Case vignette 2: A 17‐year‐old patient with an MRI‐positive FCD 3D, FCD gene panel negative
We report on a 17‐year‐old female patient with seizure onset at the age of 5 years. She was born at the 35th week of gestation with an ischemic infarct of the right middle cerebral artery (Figure 4). She suffered from face somatosensory auras followed by tonic face seizures and bilateral eyelid flutter or evolving into a generalized tonic–clonic seizure. MRI studies confirmed encephalomalacia in the right frontoparietal operculum and subinsular region, consistent with remote infarction in the territory of the right middle cerebral artery (MCA; Figure 4A–C). During presurgical evaluation, this patient also had stereo‐EEG recordings and intraoperative electrocorticography. A consensus agreement was reached at the patient management conference to offer a right frontal lobe resection. We received the surgical specimen for microscopic review and observed a microscopically detectable lesion in the frontal neocortex showing clusters of neurons and neuropil in the superficial neocortex surrounded by a dense glial scarring. There were no DN or BC. Immunohistochemical stainings using NeuN (Figure 4D), MAP2 (Figure 4E; antibodies provided by Dr. Riederer, Lausanne, Switzerland), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; Figure 4F; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) confirmed an acquired FCD Type 3D subtype. FCD gene panel testing of MTOR, AKT1, AKT3, PIK3CA, PIK3R2, DEPDC5, TSC1, TSC2, NPRL2, NPRL3, PTEN, BRAF, and SLC35A2 detected no mutation in fresh‐frozen brain tissue (from frontal lobe) and paired peripheral blood samples. The patient is seizure‐free with occasional auras since 1 year after surgery (Engel class Ib).
This case highlights the concept of acquired FCD, that is, FCD Type 3 of the ILAE classification system (5). It is generally believed that these acquired lesions do not carry genetic driving mutations, which was also proven in this case. This does not exclude, however, that there is no genetic risk factor present, but this will need a different approach for testing, that is, genome‐wide copy number variations (48). SEEG recordings confirmed the onset of seizures at the lesional site, and we continue to hypothesize that FCD 3D is the underlying structural lesion in need of surgical resection treatment. However, FCD 3D is a difficult‐to‐treat situation as the lesion may extend the MRI visible area, and long‐term disease history decreases the chance of postsurgical seizure control (2). In other cases, FCD 3 subtypes are more debatable, such as FCD 3A associated with hippocampal sclerosis (49) and FCD 3B associated with a brain tumor (7).
Based on the findings of this case and our current understanding to improve clinical diagnosis using a multi‐tiered approach, we would suggest the following classification scheme (Table 2):
TABLE 2.
Neuroimaging findings | Encephalomalacia in the right frontoparietal operculum and subinsular region, consistent with remote infarction in the right MCA territory |
Histopathology | Glial scarring and cortical dyslamination with neuronal clustering, no dysmorphic neurons, and no balloon cells (SMI32‐ and vimentin immunohistochemistry) |
ILAE classification 2011 | FCD Type 3D |
Molecular‐genetic findings | FCD gene panel negative for MTOR, AKT1, AKT3, PIK3CA, PIK3R2, DEPDC5, TSC1, TSC2, NPRL2, NPRL3, PTEN, BRAF, and SLC35A2 (fresh‐frozen brain tissue and paired peripheral blood samples) |
Integrated diagnosis | MRI‐positive Focal Cortical Dysplasia 3D, FCD gene panel negative |
FCD Type 3 was introduced into the 2011 ILAE classification to distinguish architectural abnormalities of the neocortex adjacent to an epileptogenic principal lesion from isolated FCD Type 1 (5). A major concern at that time was that such associated FCD Type 3 lesions may result from the same pathomechanism underlying the principle lesion and would not exist otherwise as bona fide cortical dysplasia. However, four subtypes were proposed based on the fact that previous publications addressing this topic specifically focused on patients having neocortical architectural abnormalities associated with hippocampal sclerosis (FCD Type 3A), low‐grade developmental brain tumors (FCD Type 3B), vascular malformations (FCD Type 3C), other lesions acquired in early life, that is, encephalitis or perinatal brain insults (FCD Type 3D). FCD Type 3D is a concept adopted from “progressive cortical dysplasia” in young children with shaken infant syndrome (50). Indeed, perinatal injuries are frequent and compromise cortical maturation, known to continue into adolescence. Classic examples are glial scars and abnormal cortical layering with horizontal and radial orientation around porencephalic cysts (Figure 4). This pattern contrasts any traumatic brain injuries occurring at later ages and which do not change the architectural matrix of the neocortex. A distinct clinico‐pathological variant of FCD Type 3D has recently been described in 12 children with remote hypoxic–ischemic injury, histologically showing vertical dyslamination characterized by loss of layer 4 in the occipital neocortex (51), similar to the picture shown in the 2011 ILAE classification as one example of FCD Type 1B. The case published in 2011 was re‐reviewed and re‐assigned to FCD Type 3D (Figure 1C).
All patterns of architectural abnormalities occurring either as FCD ILAE Type 1 or Type 3 can be observed in other disease conditions. As a matter of fact, they even reflect normal architectural components of the human brain, as historically highlighted by the various cortical parcellation schemes (52). Other troublesome differential diagnoses of architectural abnormality include tissue artifacts as a result of oblique tissue cuts as demonstrated by irregular vascular profiles, surgical manipulation including toothpaste phenomena, and bleedings, as well as previous invasive recordings using depth electrodes, subdural grids, or intraoperative electrocorticography. The difficulty of describing a cortical specimen as normal does not exclude any compromised molecular signaling pathway as these may manifest only at the molecular level, that is, DNA methylation signature, and cannot be detected microscopically.
1.2.1. FCD Type 1: Neuropathology and current understanding of the disease
In the setting of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy, architectural abnormalities of the human cerebral neocortex without cellular or “cytoarchitectural” features of DN and BC were first described in 2002 (53). The histological feature seemed distinct from cortical dysplasia of Taylor‐type (32) and was subsequently introduced into the Palmini classification scheme as FCD Type 1 (54). Since then, FCD Type 1 became an increasingly recognized clinical diagnosis, often despite the absence of a readily visible lesion on MRI. Another ongoing debate was poor histopathology agreement for this category (55). Particular areas of conflict posed those patients with an MRI‐visible non‐FCD lesion, that is, hippocampal sclerosis (HS), vascular malformations, and brain tumors. Noteworthy, clinical presentation of FCD Type 1 in patients with early‐onset epilepsy and high seizure frequency is different from that of patients with HS and febrile seizures followed by a latency period, after which seizures may occur only weekly or monthly (56, 57). In addition, neither clinical presentation nor postsurgical outcome was different in patients with HS with or without associated FCD Type 1 (57, 58). Based on these considerations, a previous ILAE Task Force decided to split the large group of FCD Palmini Type I into two newly defined categories (5), that is, FCD ILAE Types 1 and 3. According to the 2011 ILAE classification of FCD, FCD Type 1 remained a specific category showing architectural disorganization of the neocortex likely resulting from compromised neurodevelopment, without evidence of any other epileptogenic principal lesion in the brain examined with either MRI or histopathology. The concept of such FCD Type 1 has been supported by the description of a series of young patients with a severe and difficult‐to‐treat epilepsy phenotype (20, 56). The histopathology signatures of these children share posterior quadrant epilepsy with frequent seizures, disease onset in early life, and histopathologically described abundance of so‐called “microcolumns,” hitherto classified as FCD Type 1A (Figure 1A). Similar patterns of microcolumnar organization of the neocortex were also described in children with genetic defects or inborn metabolic diseases, although with more widespread distribution (59). It was discussed by the Task Force that such microcolumnar organization resembles neuronal radial migration streams during corticogenesis (60, 61) and may result, therefore, from delayed or arrested maturation at mid‐gestation. However, experimental evidence has not yet been provided.
Taking these neurodevelopmental principles in the neocortical organization into consideration, the Task Force then also acknowledged the possibility of compromised horizontal layer organization, which has been assigned as FCD Type 1B (5). Up to date, however, no study conclusively described a clinical phenotype or syndrome for patients with FCD Type 1B. The illustrated case shown in Figure 2 of the 2011 classification was re‐reviewed meanwhile and re‐assigned to FCD Type 3D (Figure 1D) with loss of layer 4 in the occipital lobe associated with perinatal hypoxic injury (51). Another FCD Type 1 subcategory was also established in the 2011 classification scheme, assuming a mixed phenotype of radial and horizontal cortical disorganization, that is, FCD Type 1C. Such a mixed phenotype has been indeed recognized by routine pathology in the neocortex compromised by early perinatal lesions, such as large vascular malformations. Nonetheless, the categories of FCD Type 1B and 1C are often used nowadays, although we have not yet learned about a specific clinical presentation of these patients. They usually remain MRI negative (24) and have not been reported or published before the 2011 ILAE classification of FCD was released. The true existence and potential pathogenic cause will require, therefore, continuous research efforts.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
The authors contribution to the manuscript were as follows: Ingmar Blumcke wrote the introduction, Imad Najm drafted the case vignettes, Fernando Cendes drafted the MRI sections, Maria Thom drafted the section on FCD 1, Eleonora Aronica on FCD 2 and Hajime Miyata on FCD 3. Ingmar Blumcke has finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
EA is supported by Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and Epilepsiefonds.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Blumcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G, Coras R, Kobow K, Bien CG, et al. Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1648–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lamberink HJ, Otte WM, Blümcke I, Braun KPJ. Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:748–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bernasconi A, Cendes F, Theodore WH, Gill RS, Koepp MJ, Hogan RE, et al. Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: a consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force. Epilepsia. 2019;60:1054–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baldassari S, Ribierre T, Marsan E, Adle‐Biassette H, Ferrand‐Sorbets S, Bulteau C, et al. Dissecting the genetic basis of Focal Cortical Dysplasia: a large cohort study. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:885–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Blumcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, Armstrong DD, Vinters HV, Palmini A, et al. The clinico‐pathological spectrum of Focal Cortical Dysplasias: a consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. Epilepsia. 2011;52:158–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schurr J, Coras R, Rossler K, Pieper T, Kudernatsch M, Holthausen H, et al. Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in frontal lobe epilepsy: a new clinico‐pathological entity. Brain Pathol. 2017;27:26–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blümcke I, Aronica E, Becker A, Capper D, Coras R, Honavar M, et al. Low‐grade epilepsy‐associated neuroepithelial tumours ‐ the 2016 WHO classification. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:732–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Slegers RJ, Blumcke I. Low‐grade developmental and epilepsy associated brain tumors: a critical update 2020. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D, et al. DNA methylation‐based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018;555:469–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kobow K, Jabari S, Pieper T, Kudernatsch M, Polster T, Woermann FG, et al. Mosaic trisomy of chromosome 1q in human brain tissue associates with unilateral polymicrogyria, very early‐onset focal epilepsy, and severe developmental delay. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;140(6):881–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harvey AS, Mandelstam SA, Maixner WJ, Leventer RJ, Semmelroch M, MacGregor D, et al. The surgically remediable syndrome of epilepsy associated with bottom‐of‐sulcus dysplasia. Neurology. 2015;84:2021–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ying Z, Wang I, Blümcke I, Bulacio J, Alexopoulos A, Jehi L, et al. A comprehensive clinico‐pathological and genetic evaluation of bottom‐of‐sulcus Focal Cortical Dysplasia in patients with difficult‐to‐localize focal epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2019;21:65–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bonduelle T, Hartlieb T, Baldassari S, Sim NS, Kim SH, Kang HC, et al. Frequent SLC35A2 brain mosaicism in mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE). Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cendes F, Theodore WH, Brinkmann BH, Sulc V, Cascino GD. Neuroimaging of epilepsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;136:985–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Ciantis A, Barba C, Tassi L, Cosottini M, Tosetti M, Costagli M, et al. 7T MRI in focal epilepsy with unrevealing conventional field strength imaging. Epilepsia. 2016;57:445–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Von Oertzen J, Urbach H, Jungbluth S, Kurthen M, Reuber M, Fernandez G, et al. Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:643–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Opheim G, van der Kolk A, Bloch KM, Colon AJ, Davis KA, Henry TR, et al. 7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the use of 7T in clinical practice. Neurology. 2021;96(7):327–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Trattnig S, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Juras V, Robinson S, et al. Clinical applications at ultrahigh field (7 T). Where does it make the difference? NMR Biomed. 2016;29:1316–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang I, Oh S, Blumcke I, Coras R, Krishnan B, Kim S, et al. Value of 7T MRI and post‐processing in patients with nonlesional 3T MRI undergoing epilepsy presurgical evaluation. Epilepsia. 2020;61(11):2509–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blumcke I, Pieper T, Pauli E, Hildebrandt M, Kudernatsch M, Winkler P, et al. A distinct variant of Focal Cortical Dysplasia type I characterised by magnetic resonance imaging and neuropathological examination in children with severe epilepsies. Epileptic Disord. 2010;12:172–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bronen RA, Spencer DD, Fulbright RK. Cerebrospinal fluid cleft with cortical dimple: MR imaging marker for focal cortical dysgenesis. Radiology. 2000;214:657–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mellerio C, Labeyrie MA, Chassoux F, Daumas‐Duport C, Landre E, Turak B, et al. Optimizing MR imaging detection of type 2 Focal Cortical Dysplasia: best criteria for clinical practice. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1932–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mellerio C, Labeyrie MA, Chassoux F, Roca P, Alami O, Plat M, et al. 3T MRI improves the detection of transmantle sign in type 2 Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Epilepsia. 2014;55:117–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang ZI, Alexopoulos AV, Jones SE, Jaisani Z, Najm IM, Prayson RA. The pathology of magnetic‐resonance‐imaging‐negative epilepsy. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(8):1051–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Garganis K, Kokkinos V, Zountsas B, Dinopoulos A, Coras R, Blümcke I. Temporal lobe "plus" epilepsy associated with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE). Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;140:296–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hartlieb T, Winkler P, Coras R, Pieper T, Holthausen H, Blümcke I, et al. Age‐related MR characteristics in mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy (MOGHE). Epilepsy Behav. 2019;91:68–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin Y, Xu X, Aung T, Murakami H, Blumcke I, Bingaman W, et al. Basal temporo‐occipital mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia: A multimodal investigation turning non‐lesional to lesional epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131:2826–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baulac S, Ishida S, Marsan E, Miquel C, Biraben A, Nguyen DK, et al. Familial focal epilepsy with Focal Cortical Dysplasia due to DEPDC5 mutations. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:675–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dibbens LM, de Vries B, Donatello S, Heron SE, Hodgson BL, Chintawar S, et al. Mutations in DEPDC5 cause familial focal epilepsy with variable foci. Nat Genet. 2013;45:546–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lal D, Reinthaler EM, Schubert J, Muhle H, Riesch E, Kluger G, et al. DEPDC5 mutations in genetic focal epilepsies of childhood. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:788–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee WS, Stephenson SEM, Howell KB, Pope K, Gillies G, Wray A, et al. Second‐hit DEPDC5 mutation is limited to dysmorphic neurons in cortical dysplasia type IIA. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6:1338–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Taylor DC, Falconer MA, Bruton CJ, Corsellis JA. Focal dysplasia of the cerebral cortex in epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34:369–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rossini L, Moroni RF, Tassi L, Watakabe A, Yamamori T, Spreafico R, et al. Altered layer‐specific gene expression in cortical samples from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52:1928–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cotter D, Honavar M, Lovestone S, Raymond L, Kerwin R, Anderton B, et al. Disturbance of Notch‐1 and Wnt signalling proteins in neuroglial balloon cells and abnormal large neurons in Focal Cortical Dysplasia in human cortex. Acta Neuropathol. 1999;98(5):465–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lamparello P, Baybis M, Pollard J, Hol EM, Eisenstat DD, Aronica E, et al. Developmental lineage of cell types in cortical dysplasia with balloon cells. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 9):2267–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nakagawa JM, Donkels C, Fauser S, Schulze‐Bonhage A, Prinz M, Zentner J, et al. Characterization of Focal Cortical Dysplasia with balloon cells by layer‐specific markers: evidence for differential vulnerability of interneurons. Epilepsia. 2017;58:635–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cepeda C, Andre VM, Flores‐Hernandez J, Nguyen OK, Wu N, Klapstein GJ, et al. Pediatric cortical dysplasia: correlations between neuroimaging, electrophysiology and location of cytomegalic neurons and balloon cells and glutamate/GABA synaptic circuits. Dev Neurosci. 2005;27:59–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rampp S, Rossler K, Hamer H, Illek M, Buchfelder M, Doerfler A, et al. Dysmorphic neurons as cellular source for phase‐amplitude coupling in Focal Cortical Dysplasia Type II. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132:782–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Avansini SH, Torres FR, Vieira AS, Dogini DB, Rogerio F, Coan AC, et al. Dysregulation of NEUROG2 plays a key role in Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:623–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Blauwblomme T, Dossi E, Pellegrino C, Goubert E, Iglesias BG, Sainte‐Rose C, et al. Gamma‐aminobutyric acidergic transmission underlies interictal epileptogenicity in pediatric Focal Cortical Dysplasia. Ann Neurol. 2019;85:204–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.D'Gama AM, Woodworth MB, Hossain AA, Bizzotto S, Hatem NE, LaCoursiere CM, et al. Somatic mutations activating the mTOR pathway in dorsal telencephalic progenitors cause a continuum of cortical dysplasias. Cell Rep. 2017;21:3754–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arena A, Zimmer TS, van Scheppingen J, Korotkov A, Anink JJ, Muhlebner A, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation in a spectrum of epileptogenic cortical malformations: molecular insights into their interdependence. Brain Pathol. 2019;29:351–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Iyer A, Zurolo E, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC, Baayen JC, Gorter JA, et al. Evaluation of the innate and adaptive immunity in type I and type II Focal Cortical Dysplasias. Epilepsia. 2010;51:1763–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zurolo E, Iyer A, Maroso M, Carbonell C, Anink JJ, Ravizza T, et al. Activation of Toll‐like receptor, RAGE and HMGB1 signalling in malformations of cortical development. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 4):1015–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Owens GC, Garcia AJ, Mochizuki AY, Chang JW, Reyes SD, Salamon N, et al. Evidence for innate and adaptive immune responses in a cohort of intractable pediatric epilepsy surgery patients. Front Immunol. 2019;10:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xu D, Robinson AP, Ishii T, Duncan DS, Alden TD, Goings GE, et al. Peripherally derived T regulatory and gammadelta T cells have opposing roles in the pathogenesis of intractable pediatric epilepsy. J Exp Med. 2018;215:1169–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sim NS, Ko A, Kim WK, Kim SH, Kim JS, Shim KW, et al. Precise detection of low‐level somatic mutation in resected epilepsy brain tissue. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:901–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Niestroj LM, Perez‐Palma E, Howrigan DP, Zhou Y, Cheng F, Saarentaus E, et al. Epilepsy subtype‐specific copy number burden observed in a genome‐wide study of 17 458 subjects. Brain. 2020;143:2106–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Najm IM, Sarnat HB, Blümcke I. Review: the international consensus classification of Focal Cortical Dysplasia ‐ a critical update 2018. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2018;44:18–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marin‐Padilla M, Parisi JE, Armstrong DL, Sargent SK, Kaplan JA. Shaken infant syndrome: developmental neuropathology, progressive cortical dysplasia, and epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103(4):321–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang DD, Piao YS, Blumcke I, Coras R, Zhou WJ, Gui QP, et al. A distinct clinicopathological variant of Focal Cortical Dysplasia IIId characterized by loss of layer 4 in the occipital lobe in 12 children with remote hypoxic‐ischemic injury. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1697–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brodmann K. Beiträge zur histologischen Lokalisierung der Grosshirnrinde. VI. Mitteilung: Die Cortexgliederung des Menschen (in german). J Physiol Neurol. 1908;10:231–46. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tassi L, Colombo N, Garbelli R, Francione S, Lo Russo G, Mai R, et al. Focal Cortical Dysplasia: neuropathological subtypes, EEG, neuroimaging and surgical outcome. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 8):1719–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Palmini A, Najm I, Avanzini G, Babb T, Guerrini R, Foldvary‐Schaefer N, et al. Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias. Neurology. 2004;62(6 Suppl 3):S2–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chamberlain WA, Cohen ML, Gyure KA, Kleinschmidt‐DeMasters BK, Perry A, Powell SZ, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in Focal Cortical Dysplasia (malformations of cortical development). Epilepsia. 2009;50:2593–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hildebrandt M, Pieper T, Winkler P, Kolodziejczyk D, Holthausen H, Blumcke I. Neuropathological spectrum of cortical dysplasia in children with severe focal epilepsies. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tassi L, Garbelli R, Colombo N, Bramerio M, Lo Russo G, Deleo F, et al. Type I Focal Cortical Dysplasia: surgical outcome is related to histopathology. Epileptic Disord. 2010;12:181–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Krsek P, Maton B, Jayakar P, Dean P, Korman B, Rey G, et al. Incomplete resection of Focal Cortical Dysplasia is the main predictor of poor postsurgical outcome. Neurology. 2009;72:217–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sarnat HB, Flores‐Sarnat L. Neuropathology of paediatric epilepsy. In: Dulac O, Lassonde M, Sarnat HB, eds. Handbook of clinical neurology: paediatric neurology. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2013:399–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mountcastle VB. The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain. 1997;120(Pt 4):701–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rakic P. Specification of cerebral cortical areas. Science. 1988;241:170–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Thom M, Eriksson S, Martinian L, Caboclo LO, McEvoy AW, Duncan JS, et al. Temporal Lobe Sclerosis Associated With Hippocampal Sclerosis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Neuropathological Features. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:928–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.