Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Pediatr. 2021 Jun 16;68:71–88. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2021.05.003

Addressing Parental ACEs in the Pediatric Setting

Rupal C Gupta 1, Kimberly A Randell 2, M Denise Dowd 3
PMCID: PMC8412208  NIHMSID: NIHMS1702139  PMID: 34243860

Abstract

Parents’ own adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) impact their children’s physical and emotional health. Causal mechanisms are not fully understood but are likely multifactorial, affecting parent resiliency and attachment behaviors, with possible intergenerational transmission. Although universal screening for parental ACEs is controversial, they may be identified during pediatric care. Providers can address parental ACEs by consistently using trauma-informed, healing-centered approaches that acknowledge the impact of trauma and the presence of resilience, promote positive parenting skills, and provide compassionate support universally. When necessary, more targeted interventions may include referral to community social support services and parenting programming. Incorporating a two-generation approach in pediatrics may enhance and support child health and well-being more robustly.

Keywords: Parent trauma, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Toxic stress, Childhood trauma, Parenting, Resilience

Introduction

A 27-year-old mother of an asthmatic 8-year-old struggles with anxiety and depression and feels overwhelmed with her parental responsibilities. Her child has been hospitalized three times in the past year with severe asthma exacerbations. A 30-year-old father responds to his four-year-old’s challenging behaviors with anger and harsh verbal discipline. He wants his child prescribed something to “calm him down.” From comments made by these parents you understand that each of them had what they both refer to as a “tough” upbringing. You ponder the relationship between those parental experiences and the children’s health and development challenges.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are part of the contemporary pediatric lexicon. The term describes traumatic experiences occurring prior to the age of 18 years, which are strongly associated in a dose-response manner with lifelong negative physical and mental health consequences1 including cardiovascular disease,2 liver disease,3 depression,4 substance abuse,5,6 and suicidality.7 Multiple studies have consistently reproduced these findings, and related associations have been expanded to include poor educational, social-emotional and employment outcomes.1,8 ACEs are very common, with one half to two-thirds of the adult population experiencing at least one ACE.9,10 ACEs occur at all income levels but there is a direct linear relationship between high ACE score (>=4) and lower incomes.11,12 The ACEs in Felitti et al’s original work included psychological, physical, or sexual abuse; violence against the mother; or living with household members with substance use disorder, mental illness, suicidality, or history of imprisonment.1 More recently, researchers have proposed expanding ACEs criteria to include witnessing violence, experiencing discrimination, lacking a safe neighborhood, being bullied, and living in foster care.13

Although we use the conventional term “parental ACEs” in this paper, we recognize that many children live with a non-parent primary caregiver. Thus, we ask the reader to keep in mind that the concepts and recommendations discussed below may be applied to any of a child’s caregivers.

Parental ACEs and Child Health Outcomes

More recent work expands our understanding of the impact of ACEs to include the negative impact of parental ACEs on child health broadly across multiple domains. A population-based study of Philadelphia parent-child dyads found that for each point increase in parental expanded ACE score the odds of poor overall child health increased by 19% and asthma by 17%.14 Maternal ACEs also predict impaired birth weight and missed child preventive care.15,16 Multiple studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship between parental ACE score and risk for child developmental delay, with one study finding maternal ACE score of 3 or greater associated with 2.2 times greater likelihood of suspected child developmental delay and an increasing number of developmental domains affected.1719 Maternal ACEs are also associated with reduced child Ages and Stages Questionnaire Social-Emotional Score.15 Additionally, a dose-response relationship is seen with parental ACEs and child hyperactivity, emotional disturbance, and aggressive behavior.20,21 Available studies primarily examine maternal data; much less is known about the impact of paternal ACEs but it is likely that they affect children’s health similarly.16,20

Early Experiences and the Impact of Parental ACEs on Parenting Behaviors

Causal mechanisms for the relationship between parental ACEs and child health outcomes are not yet fully understood, but evidence to date suggests that multiple pathways are contributory. Chief among these is the impact of parental ACEs on parenting behaviors.22 The early years are a critical developmental period because experiences during this time embed themselves in the brain circuitry and provide scaffolding for behavior, emotionality, and physiology across the lifespan.23 Safe, stable, nurturing relationships and growth through positive experiences form the roots of resilience, defined by Masten as the dynamic process of positive adaption to, or in spite of, significant adversity.24 Forkey’s THREADS mnemonic was initially developed to identify factors critical to child resilience: Thinking and Learning Brain, Hope, Regulation or Self-control, Efficacy, Attachment, Developmental Skill Mastery, and Social Connectedness.25 An adaptation of this mnemonic can aid in understanding the impact of the presence or absence of parental ACEs on parent resilience and parenting behaviors (Table 1).

Table 1:

Potential impact of Parental ACEs on the THREADS of Resilience and Parenting

Threads of Childhood25 Relevance to Parenting How ACEs may disrupt THREADS, impairing parental resiliency
Thinking and Learning Brain Parenting is a skill that can be developed, with opportunity for continued growth and cognitive development. Reflexive behaviors and actions of brain may take over to manage a small and large threats; parents may have increased short-/long-term response to stimuli and increased reactivity to harsh environmental cues27
Hope Belief, faith, and optimism in a future for oneself can motivate positive parenting behavior Parents may have abandoned hope to deal with present challenges, experience negative emotions more strongly and have impaired coping77
Regulation and Self-Control Executive function including working memory, problem-solving, inhibition control and attention control are critical to responsive parenting. Parent may impulsively react to unpredictable events. This carries high risk of unhealthy behaviors (e.g. smoking during pregnancy, alcohol, marijuana, illicit drug use) which impair ability to parent positively.6,36
Efficacy Parent has knowledge that they can impact their environment or situation. Parent may not be able to maintain efficacy when reacting to situations rather than being in control of them. Mental illness, if present, and additional stressors and adversities such as poverty can compound already heightened parenting stress.23,78
Attachment and Attunement Parent has secure attachment, marked by responsiveness and concern for their child.79 Attachment may be impaired. Depression, PTSD, or anxiety, if present, can lead to a parent having reduced emotional responsiveness to child’s needs and intrusive behavior toward80,81 children.
Developmental Skill Mastery Distance and Self-Care Parent succeeds in building life skills alongside nurturing skills. Parent realizes self-worth without relying on child for sense of personal accomplishment. In having to deal with the present threat, parents may lose ability to focus on future goals, nurturing their child, or both.
Social Connectedness (home, school, and community-based) Parent can achieve the above within a network of positive, supportive social relationships. Parent may have lost social connectedness due to past or present trauma.

A child’s capacity for resilient adaptation across the life course develops within the context of their relationships with primary caregivers. Individuals who experienced a positive family emotional climate, positive attachment with their parents, and less authoritarian parenting during their childhood are more likely to show warm, sensitive, stimulating maternal behavior in adulthood.26 In the absence of a nurturing parental relationship, however, adults may develop a heightened stress response and altered capacity to respond effectively to life’s stressors, such as raising their own children.

The biological mechanism by which ACEs impair parenting is hypothesized to be multifold, correlating with the known impact of ACEs on child brain development. Parental emotionality and nurturing behavior are dependent on autonomic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) functioning, and ACEs negatively impact both.27 Sustained activation of the stress response system in response to ACEs results in cell hypertrophy and proliferation as well as brain remodeling in the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.28 These architectural shifts impair the development of critical areas related to memory, learning, decision-making, and stress response.28,29 They also increase parental risk of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and poor emotional regulation, which may decrease parental availability to respond to a child’s needs.15,30,31

Intergenerational Transmission of ACEs

Parental ACEs may further impact child health through intergenerational transmission of ACEs. One hypothesized pathway for this transmission is epigenetic modification. Epigenetics refers to molecular-level changes in gene expression that occur as a result of environmental factors such as toxins and social-emotional factors such as manner of care and nurturing.32 ACEs have been found in human and animal studies to increase methylation of DNA in the promoter region of several genes including the glucocorticoid receptor gene, functionally reducing expression of those genes and leading to dysfunction of the HPA axis.27 It is understood that some epigenetic changes are inherited,33 and thus potentially affect the stress response and behaviors of future generations, but the inevitability of transmission and extent of impact are not known. Pregnant women with high ACEs have a greater risk of fetal demise, 34 giving birth to a preterm infant,35 and high-risk health behaviors during their pregnancy.36 Research into the epigenetic mechanisms around ACEs and parenting abilities is still in its infancy, with further work needed to evaluate how the epigenetics of ACEs may impact other hormones and neurotransmitters, including dopamine, oxytocin, and other neuropeptides thought to be involved in nurturing.

These gaps notwithstanding, it is clear that parental ACEs may directly beget children’s ACEs. Children of parents with a high ACE score are themselves more likely to experience childhood adversity,37 in part because ACE-related adult health outcomes, such as mental illness and substance use disorder, may themselves be ACEs for their children. Additionally, the conditions contributing to childhood adversity may continue to be present in adulthood, thus setting up potential for exposure of the next generation to the ACEs of poverty and violence. Further, parents who have experienced childhood adversity and poor modeling by their parents are more likely to take on suboptimal attitudes and parenting beliefs.38,39 Mothers who experienced child physical abuse have been found to be 1.5 times more likely to use corporal punishment than those who had not been abused.39 Fathers who experienced ACEs were more likely to be perpetrators of violence against their partners.40

Framework for addressing parental ACEs in pediatric care settings

Trauma-informed care and healing-centered engagement provide a general framework for addressing parental ACEs. A trauma-informed approach to parental ACEs recognizes the high prevalence of ACEs, that any parent may have experienced childhood adversity, and that these experiences will influence parenting practices, the stresses of parenting, and interactions with the pediatric healthcare team.41 Central to trauma-informed care is a shift from the question of “What is wrong with you?” to the question of “What happened to you?” Healing-centered engagement adds the question, “What is right with you?” in recognition that all individuals, including those with a history of trauma, have strengths.42 Further, healing-centered engagement views healing as a collective experience, stresses culture as central to well-being, and empowers individuals to play an active role in their healing.42 Healthcare teams must keep in mind that although trauma has a significant impact, these experiences do not fully define any individual. Practicing healing-centered engagement can enable pediatricians to work with families from a perspective that focuses just as strongly on strengths and possibility as it does on trauma and its negative impacts. Above all, this approach frames ACEs as history and not destiny. It emphasizes resilience and success despite exposure to adversities.

Recognition of Parental ACEs in Clinical Settings

A trauma-informed perspective will enable pediatricians to recognize parent behaviors that may be a consequence of ACEs. Table 2 depicts the mnemonic “FRAYED,” based on the understanding that trauma may “fray” the fabric of healthy human development.25 Initially developed to aid in identification of child symptoms related to trauma, the mnemonic may also be applied to parents. Considering how ACEs can fray the THREADS of parental resilience (Table 2) may aid pediatric health providers in identifying manifestations of parental ACEs. Notably, some behavioral consequences of parental ACEs may be a downstream consequence of multiple impacts of ACEs (e.g., decreased engagement may be due to attunement challenges, substance use disorder and/or depression). Although issues other than parental ACEs (e.g., current psychosocial stressors) may trigger these parental behaviors, pediatricians must consider that these behaviors may be indicative of past trauma. When these behaviors occur, pediatricians can use this as an opportunity to explore what may be driving the behavior and model safe and nurturing responses (Box 1).

Table 2:

Possible manifestations when parental resilience is FRAYED

Elements of FRAYED parenting 25 How parents may present in the pediatric setting

Fear, Fighting, and Fretting • Interaction with the healthcare setting may trigger an emotional response related to past trauma
• Missed or delayed appointments
• Difficulty following through with treatment plans
• Easy frustration with the healthcare team or child behaviors

Regulation Disorders • Difficulty controlling emotions and temper
• Quickness to anger
• Disrespectful or demanding interactions

Attunement Challenges • Difficulty perceiving child needs and responding appropriately
• Challenges in supporting their child during painful medical procedures
• Challenges recognizing urgency of child’s medical needs in relationship to more immediate needs

Alcohol and Substance Abuse • Past or current substance abuse may:
 ○ Impact engagement with healthcare system, such as aversion to medical procedures
 ○ Decrease ability to parent effectively

Yelling • Harsh, punitive parenting
• Harsh interactions with child and/or healthcare team

Exhaustion • Decreased engagement with the child’s healthcare team
• Difficulty following through with treatment plans

Defeat/Detachment • Depression and/or hopelessness
• Lack of attachment with their child
• Decreased engagement with the child’s healthcare team

Box 1:

Starting a conversation when THREADS may be FRAYED

In our practice we work to recognize that families may have trauma in the past, and that there are strengths that everyone can use and build on. Would you be open to discussing the strengths you rely on to be an effective parent?
Many families find it challenging to [make it to every appointment, get every medication dose, etc.]. What are some things that make this challenging for your family?
(In response to a parent’s frustration with a young child’s behavior in the moment) It’s so hard for kids to be cooped up in these small rooms, and for parents, too. Can we get your child [a snack, something to color, a book to look at]?
You’re frustrated with [how the school is handling a situation, your child’s behavior etc.]. You are worried about your child, and the process is not what you expected. [pause for parent response]
Being a parent is hard and can feel exhausting. Our own experiences as children might make parenting harder. How do you think your experiences while you were growing up might impact how you parent?
I notice you’re [checking the time, checking your phone]. I know the rest of your life doesn’t slow down just because you’re here for your child’s appointment. [pause for parent response]
 • Follow up question: Tell me about your priorities today and how we can best meet your needs today.
What can we do to help you comfort your child today when we complete your child’s [visit, immunizations, blood testing]? What might help your child feel more comfortable during the procedure?

The Challenges of Screening

Research on incorporating ACEs screening, including parental ACE screening, as a routine component of healthcare, is in its infancy and no gold standard screening tool exists. Many experts have cautioned against universal ACE screening for both patients and their caregivers.4346 Concerns about adoption of ACEs screening include lack of standardized screening tools or criteria. It is also unclear at this point what should be assessed, i.e., individual ACEs and/or an ACE score. Currently available ACE screening tools do not capture duration, frequency, or magnitude of trauma. Further, providing resource information and service referral based solely on ACE score may overlook parents experiencing ongoing negative impacts of fewer ACEs. An algorithmic approach to parental ACEs based on ACE score may also limit appreciation of resilience factors and strengths and alienate or stigmatize parents without necessarily empowering them to address their past. ACE questionnaires are also population health tools and do not predict outcomes at the individual level.47

Conversely, others advocate for universal ACE screening as a means to identify risk and guide treatment and resource allocation.48 Some practices have implemented traditional ACEs screening tools with parents. Gillespie et al introduced universal parental ACE screening in their private, primary care practice with evidence of feasibility, including acceptability among parents and providers.49 Components of this written screening include a framing statement that normalizes the screening, screening for ACE score, and assessment for resilience factors. Providers were given guidance for addressing positive screens, including verbal prompts from AAP Connected Kids to facilitate provider-parent discussions, developmental promotion activity handouts, and social services resource lists for parents.49 Although the intervention has shown acceptability among parents and providers, the impact of this screening on parenting behaviors and child health outcomes is not yet known.

Screening for parental ACEs, if pursued, works best if conducted within the context of a nurturing clinician-family relationship, with acknowledgement and identification of resilience factors as well as provision of concrete resources.46 Pediatricians must also keep in mind the need to address current psychosocial issues, including intimate partner violence, mental health issues, and substance use disorder, which have immediate consequences to the child and available interventions.46 Identification of current psychosocial stressors for which there are evidence-based interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy for relapse prevention50) should not be eschewed in favor of parental ACEs screening.50

Implications for Practice

Pediatric health care providers have multiple options to support parents affected by ACEs. These may be viewed as a two-pronged approach, with universal interventions provided to all families and targeted interventions provided when risk and negative impacts are identified. The goal of both levels of intervention is to mitigate the potential impact of parental ACEs on child health and well-being and to strengthen parent and family resilience factors.

Recognizing the sensitive nature of such disclosures, documentation of parental ACEs in a child's medical record should be limited. This ensures confidentiality of a disclosure of experiences that other caregivers with access to the child’s chart may not know, or that the parent would not wish the child to learn of should the child eventually access the chart. Further, a caregiver who entrusts a particular member of the care team with this disclosure may not desire that it be known or accessible to the full team.51 Templated documentation denoting that the impact of parental ACEs was discussed and that appropriate resources were provided may be useful.

When past trauma or ongoing stressors are identified during a trusted provider-parent discussion, the disclosure should not be addressed as a diagnostic item to be scored. Rather it is an opportunity to validate the challenges created by trauma, recognize the caregiver’s resilience, and discuss how the caregiver sees their ACEs impacting their parenting and their child. Healthcare teams must recognize parents as the experts on their lives and empower parents to make informed choices on their own terms about use of available resources.25,52

Pediatric providers should always put the child’s safety at the forefront. If parent behaviors put the child’s health at risk, referral to child protective services may be necessary as mandated by state law or to facilitate connection to more intensive services. Any such referrals should be carried out with transparency and with the provider showing consistent and reliable support to the parent.

Universal Interventions

At baseline, pediatricians and other healthcare team members can provide consistent, trusting relationships with both parent and child, modeling compassionate availability. Each encounter with a member of the healthcare team, from a phone call to make an appointment to the provider visit, is an opportunity to nurture the relationships which are key for disclosure and discussion of parental ACEs.25,53 Further, social support and trusting relationships in parents’ lives may reduce intergenerational transmission of trauma and improve child health.54,55 Just as importantly, members of the healthcare team can model safe, stable, and nurturing relationships through their interactions with one another.

Emerging evidence supports universal education to address psychosocial issues.5658 This approach is in line with the research finding that parents desire to learn more about ACEs and resilience.49 Further, Vu et al found that key stakeholders, including adult patients, recommended conversations addressing psychosocial adversity rather than screening questionnaires.51 For parental ACEs, universal education may include conversations about the prevalence of ACEs, their impact on parent well-being, parenting practices, and child well-being, and resilience factors. Providers may also suggest additional resources for parenting and to address consequences of parental ACEs.59 Universal education creates opportunity for caregivers to learn about the impact of parental ACEs and resources without a required disclosure and to access those resources at the time and place of their choosing. This approach signals to caregivers that the provider is open to conversations about trauma, while also minimizing pressure toward disclosure that may result from a screening approach. The Connected Parents, Connected Kids pocket card (Figure 1) is a universal education intervention that use the CUES framework.60 CUES uses healing-centered engagement to empower parents to utilize resources for themselves and to serve as a resource for their community. Two pocket cards are provided to caregivers, using a script that includes 1) Confidentiality, 2) Universal Education and Empowerment, and 3) Support (Box 2).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Stepwise approach to addressing Parental ACEs in pediatric healthcare settings. The interventions listed are examples; the list is not exhaustive.

Box 2:

Using CUES and the Connected Parents-Connected Kids Card to Support Parentsa

Confidentiality
 • Share limits of confidentiality.
 • Sometimes parents share challenges they are having, and I want to assure you that this information is confidential and doesn’t go in a child’s record unless you want it to be included, or we have concerns about a child’s safety.

Universal Education + Empowerment
 • Give caregivers 2 pocket cards. Open the card and encourage them to take a look.
 • Make sure they know you are a safe person to talk to.
 • “I’m giving 2 of these cards to all parents/caregivers. They talk about how our past experiences may affect how we act as parents. It also shares some ways to take care of yourself and your kids. You can look through it, and I’m also including one for a friend or family member. On the back of the card are resources you can call or text, and you can always talk to me about how parenting is going.”

Support
 • Know how to support someone who discloses their ACEs. Disclosure is not the goal of universal education, but it will happen.
 • Offer parenting strategies and a care plan that take a history of ACEs into consideration.
 • “Thank you for sharing this with me. I’m sorry this happened. A lot of parents have experienced things like this. There are resources that can help. [Share resources] We can help make the connection to any of these if you would like.”
a

Data from Beyond Screenings: Easy Steps to Support Survivors in Health Settings Infographic. Available at: https://store.futureswithoutviolence.org/index.php/product/cues-poster/. Accessed 25 November, 2020.

Interventions promoting parenting skills can benefit all parents, but perhaps especially those with a history of ACEs who themselves did not experience positive parenting practices as children. Pediatricians can model positive parenting behaviors in their interactions with their patients, such as calling out good (or “good enough”) behavior and ignoring undesired behaviors. Programs such as Reach Out and Read and the Incredible Years also offer opportunities to model parenting skills, among a host of additional evidence-based interventions that have been introduced in the primary setting.6164 As part of routine anticipatory guidance, pediatricians can provide practical tips and concrete examples, such as scripts, for approaches to common parenting challenges. Additionally, they can normalize the frustrations of parenting and offer strategies for coping during these moments. BehaviorChecker.org is a free, evidence-based online resource that provides parents a structured approach to help address challenging behaviors in their children.65 Promotion of mindfulness practices that aid in self-regulation may also be of benefit; there are multiple mindfulness apps to which parents may be directed. Parents can also be directed to resources such as Small Moments Big Impact, a free, pediatrician-developed app for parents of infants birth through 6 months that supports infant-parent relationships and addresses the challenges of early parenting.66

Targeted Prevention Strategies for High Risk Families

More intensive and focused interventions are needed for families identified as higher risk for or acutely experiencing negative effects of parental ACEs. Multidisciplinary team-based approaches have been found effective in addressing parental ACEs and may be particularly useful in implementation of targeted interventions for families at risk. For example, family navigators on the primary care team can connect families to services, help parents develop problem-solving skills and address parenting stress, and provide emotional support.67 Some pediatric practices have mental health providers embedded within their practice.68 Some institutions have piloted two-generational programs that bridge the psychosocial, economic, and health sectors to assist parents affected by ACEs and their children, but further study is required to evaluate effects and scalability of these innovative models.69,70 These approaches may counteract barriers families face when seeking services (e.g. difficulty obtaining timely appointments, transportation barriers, and reluctance to engage with mental health providers).71

High-risk parents showing evidence of FRAYED THREADS may benefit from intensive community-based social support services and parenting programs. Pediatricians should maintain an updated list of such services in their community and be equipped to facilitate referral to these services. There are multiple evidence-based interventions, including community programs, that may help build resilience capacity in families with parents who have experienced ACEs. Figure 1 provides examples of such interventions. Of note, these interventions were not designed solely for parents with histories of ACEs. This list is not exhaustive; a wide array of additional programming is being developed in primary care settings. Providers can also reference websites such as Aunt Bertha (findhelp.org) and The Children’s Advocacy Project of America (cap4Kids.org) to find services available in their localities.64,7274

Families may be reluctant to engage with a social services professional. This barrier may be addressed by using a “warm hand-off” approach when feasible, with a healthcare team member directly connecting the family and resource provider. Additionally, practices can consider implementing a closed-loop referral system to facilitate enrollment of families in such services.

Resources

Box 3 provides summarized points that can assist pediatricians to address parental ACEs routinely. Resources that can aid pediatric healthcare teams in promoting patient and family resilience after trauma include the American Academy of Pediatrics Trauma Toolbox for Primary Care and the Pediatric Approach to Trauma, Treatment, and Resilience Project. Further, Bair-Merritt et al developed measurable standards for addressing psychosocial adversity within the patient-centered medical home that provide practical and detailed actions, many of which may be translated to pediatric care provided in non-primary care settings.75

Box 3:

Pearls and Pitfalls of Addressing Parental ACEs in Pediatric Healthcare Settings

Take a strengths-based approach:
 • Focus on positive aspects of child-parent relationships/interactions.
 • Emphasize that ACEs are history and not destiny.
 • Acknowledge the parent’s resilience.

Engage with the parent as a true partner:
 • Respect parent’s expertise in their lived experience.
 • Allow parent to guide the discussion and establish boundaries.
 • Respect parent’s choice for next steps.

Keep the child at the forefront of your relationship with the parent.

Keep in mind that trauma is not always the answer and may be accompanied by other issues. Trust parental report and do not jump to conclusions that the parent’s current situation or past history is the cause of the child’s health issues.

Be mindful of what is important to the parent as well as your relationship with the parent. It may put off a parent to raise issues around FRAYED THREADS at the wrong time or in the context of a new parent-provider relationship.

Do not ignore current factors, such as intimate partner violence, parental substance use disorder, or parental mental health concerns.

Be aware how your clinical setting may create or have undue barriers to care. Consider how your practice can improve its processes or offer additional needed services to increase parental success in navigating your setting, such as offering walk-in visits, telephone services, closed loop referral, or other services to improve engagement.

Create an environment that promotes open discussion about family challenges:
 • Display information on resources for psychosocial needs.
 • Implement universal education on parental ACEs and resilience.

Be aware of how your implicit biases may impact your relationship with families and management of child health issues to aid in equitable treatment.

Attending to self-care is critical.
 • Be aware of and maintain your personal boundaries.
 • Develop and maintain a self-care plan.
 • Discuss with parents how they take care of themselves and what they think they can try.

Conclusion

All adults were once children – Dr. Bob Block

The existing evidence on the impact of parental ACEs on child health and development is significant and growing. The implications for the policy and practice of pediatric health care are numerous and present an abundance of opportunities to improve child well-being. Certainly, the gap between what we know and what we do is immense, and we have far to go to incorporate evidence into routine practice. Pediatrician and child mental health experts have called for a “two-generation” model of child health care which has at its center the parent-child relationship.76 As more is learned about early childhood adversity, its impact on health outcomes across the life span, and its cross-generational effect, the more the potential of pediatrics is revealed.

KEY POINTS.

  • A parent’s own adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may impact the future health and well-being of their children.

  • All parents can benefit from universal education on the impact of childhood trauma on parenting and the benefits of positive parenting techniques.

  • Using a strengths-based approach when working with parents who have been affected by adverse childhood experiences allows parents to build on resilience factors.

SYNOPSIS.

Provide a brief summary of your article (100 to 150 words; no references or figures/tables). The synopsis appears only in the table of contents and is often used by indexing services such as PubMed

Acknowledgements:

We are grateful to the following individuals for their assistance with this manuscript: Elizabeth Miller, MD, PhD, for her review and feedback on Box 2, and to Tanuj Gupta, MD, MBA, Jeffrey Colvin, MD, JD, and Paul Ramírez, PhD, for their support and review at various stages of the project.

Funding:

Dr. Randell is supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K23HD098299. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Rupal C. Gupta, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

Kimberly A. Randell, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, Clinical Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

M. Denise Dowd, Interim Director Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

References

  • 1.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American journal of preventive medicine. 1998;14(4):245–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pierce JB, Kershaw KN, Kiefe CI, et al. Association of Childhood Psychosocial Environment With 30-Year Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality in Middle Age. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9(9):e015326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dong M, Dube SR, Felitti VJ, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and self-reported liver disease: new insights into the causal pathway. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003;163(16):1949–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ege MA, Messias E, Thapa PB, et al. Adverse fchildhoo dexperiences and geriatric depression: results from the 2010 BRFSS. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. 2015;23(1):110–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dube SR, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, et al. Growing up with parental alcohol abuse: exposure to childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Child abuse & neglect. 2001;25(12):1627–1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, et al. Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):564–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Merrick MT, Ports KA, Ford DC, et al. Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental health. Child abuse & neglect. 2017;69:10–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robles A, Gjelsvik A, Hirway P, et al. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Protective Factors With School Engagement. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20182945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adverse childhood experiences reported by adults --- five states, 2009. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2010;59(49):1609–1613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gilbert LK, Breiding MJ, Merrick MT, et al. Childhood adversity and adult chronic disease: an update from ten states and the District of Columbia, 2010. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015;48(3):345–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Halfon N, Larson K, Son J, et al. Income Inequality and the Differential Effect of Adverse Childhood Experiences in US Children. Academic pediatrics. 2017;17(7s):S70–s78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2006;256(3):174–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cronholm PF, Forke CM, Wade R, et al. Adverse Childhood Experiences: Expanding the Concept of Adversity. American journal of preventive medicine. 2015;49(3):354–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lê-Scherban F, Wang X, Boyle-Steed KH, et al. Intergenerational Associations of Parent Adverse Childhood Experiences and Child Health Outcomes. Pediatrics. 2018;141(6). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McDonnell CG, Valentino K. Intergenerational Effects of Childhood Trauma: Evaluating Pathways Among Maternal ACEs, Perinatal Depressive Symptoms, and Infant Outcomes. Child maltreatment. 2016;21(4):317–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eismann EA, Folger AT, Stephenson NB, et al. Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences and Pediatric Healthcare Use by 2 Years of Age. The Journal of pediatrics. 2019;211:146–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Folger AT, Eismann EA, Stephenson NB, et al. Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences and Offspring Development at 2 Years of Age. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun J,Patel F, Rose-Jacobs R, et al. Mothers’ Adverse Childhood Experiences and Their Young Children’s Development. American journal of preventive medicine. 2017;53(6):882–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Racine N, Plamondon A, Madigan S, et al. Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences and Infant Development. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schickedanz A, Halfon N, Sastry N, et al. Parents' Adverse Childhood Experiences and Their Children's Behavioral Health Problems. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoon Y, Cederbaum JA, Mennen FE, et al. Linkage between teen mother’s childhood adversity and externalizing behaviors in their children at age 11: Three aspects of parenting. Child abuse & neglect. 2019;88:326–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coe JL, Huffhines L, Contente CA, et al. Intergenerational Effects of Maternal Childhood Experiences on Maternal Parenting and Infant Developmental Progress. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP. 2020;41(8):619–627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annual review of public health. 2010;31:329–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masten AS. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist. 2001;56(3):227–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Forkey H. Putting Your Trauma Lens On. Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(7):e269–e273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Belsky J, Jaffee SR, Sligo J, et al. Intergenerational transmission of warm-sensitive-stimulating parenting: a prospective study of mothers and fathers of 3-year-olds. Child development. 2005;76(2):384–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lomanowska AM, Boivin M, Hertzman C, et al. Parenting begets parenting: A neurobiological perspective on early adversity and the transmission of parenting styles across generations. Neuroscience. 2017;342:120–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McEwen BS. Early life influences on life-long patterns of behavior and health. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2003;9(3):149–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Excessive Stress Disrupts the Architecture of the Developing Brain: Working Paper 3. Updated Edition. 2014. Available at: http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu.Accessed November 15, 2020.
  • 30.Spertus IL, Yehuda R, Wong CM, et al. Childhood emotional abuse and neglect as predictors of psychological and physical symptoms in women presenting to a primary care practice. Child abuse & neglect. 2003;27(11):1247–1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smith AL, Cross D, Winkler J, et al. Emotional Dysregulation and Negative Affect Mediate the Relationship Between Maternal History of Child Maltreatment and Maternal Child Abuse Potential. Journal of family violence. 2014;29(5):483–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McEwen BS. Understanding the potency of stressful early life experiences on brain and body function. Metabolism. 2008;57(Suppl 2):S11–S15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verhoeven KJ, vonHoldt BM, Sork VL. Epigenetics in ecology and evolution: what we know and what we need to know. Molecular ecology. 2016;25(8):1631–1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hillis SD, Anda RF, Dube SR, et al. The association between adverse childhood experiences and adolescent pregnancy, long-term psychosocial consequences, and fetal death. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):320–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Christiaens I, Hegadoren K, Olson DM. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BMC Med. 2015;13:124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chung EK, Nurmohamed L, Mathew L, et al. Risky health behaviors among mothers-to-be: the impact of adverse childhood experiences. Academic pediatrics. 2010;10(4):245–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Randell KA, O'Malley D, Dowd MD. Association of Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences and Current Child Adversity. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):786–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.O'Dougherty Wright M, Fopma-Loy J, Oberle K. In their own words: the experience of mothering as a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. Development and psychopathology. 2012;24(2):537–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chung EK, Mathew L, Rothkopf AC, et al. Parenting Attitudes and Infant Spanking: The Influence of Childhood Experiences. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):e278–e286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fonseka RW, Minnis AM, Gomez AM. Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Sri Lankan Men. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Menschner CaM A Issue Brief: Key Ingredients for Successful Trauma-Informed Care Implementation. Advancing Trauma-Informed Care, Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ginwright S. The future of healing: Shifting from trauma informed care to healing centered engagement. 2018. Available at: https://medium.com/@ginwright/the-future-of-healing-shifting-from-trauma-informed-care-to-healing-centered-engagement-634f557ce69c.Accessed November 20, 2020.
  • 43.Finkelhor D. Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): Cautions and suggestions. Child abuse & neglect. 2018;85:174–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dube SR. Continuing conversations about adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening: A public health perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2018;85:180–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McLennan JD, MacMillan HL, Afifi TO, et al. Routine ACEs screening is NOT recommended. Paediatrics & child health. 2019;24(4):272–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bair-Merritt MH, Zuckerman B. Exploring Parents' Adversities in Pediatric Primary Care. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(4):313–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baldwin JR, Caspi A, Meehan AJ, et al. Population vs Individual Prediction of Poor Health From Results of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening. JAMA Pediatrics. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stevens JE. To prevent childhood trauma, pediatricians screen children and their pediatricians-parents…and sometimes, just parents…for childhood trauma. Aces Connection 2014. Available at: https://www.acesconnection.com/blog/to-prevent-childhood-trauma-screen-children-and-their-parents-and-sometimes-just-parents-for-aces.Accessed November 23, 2020.
  • 49.Gillespie RJ, Folger AT. Feasibility of Assessing Parental ACEs in Pediatric Primary Care: Implications for Practice-Based Implementation. Journal of child & adolescent trauma. 2017;10(3):249–256. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wells EA, Kristman-Valente AN, Peavy KM, et al. Social Workers and Delivery of Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Substance Use Disorders. Social Work in Public Health. 2013;28(3–4):279–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vu C, Rothman E, Kistin CJ, et al. Adapting the Patient-Centered Medical Home to Address Psychosocial Adversity: Results of a Qualitative Study. Academic pediatrics. 2017;17(7):S115–S122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Svendsen S, Griffin J, Forkey H. Using the Attachment Relationship and Positive Parenting Principles to Build Childhood Resilience. Advances in pediatrics. 2020;67:15–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brown JD, King MA, Wissow LS. The Central Role of Relationships With Trauma-Informed Integrated Care for Children and Youth. Academic pediatrics. 2017;17(7):S94–S101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schofield TJ, Lee RD, Merrick MT. Safe, stable, nurturing relationships as a moderator of intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment: a meta-analysis. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2013;53(4 Suppl):S32–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Appleton AA, Kiley K, Holdsworth EA, et al. Social Support During Pregnancy Modifies the Association Between Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences and Infant Birth Size. Maternal and child health journal. 2019;23(3):408–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miller E, Goldstein S, McCauley HL, et al. A school health center intervention for abusive adolescent relationships: a cluster RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):76–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miller E, Jones KA, McCauley HL, et al. Cluster Randomized Trial of a College Health Center Sexual Violence Intervention. American Journal of preventive medicine. 2020;59(1):98–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tancredi DJ, Silverman JG, Decker MR, et al. Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing reproductive coercion in health settings (ARCHES). BMC women's health. 2015;15:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Purewal SK, Bucci M, Gutiérrez Wang L, et al. Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in an integrated pediatric care model. Zero to three. 2016;37(1):10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Beyond Screenings: Easy Steps to Support Survivors in Health Settings Infographic. Available at: https://store.futureswithoutviolence.org/index.php/product/cues-poster/.Accessed 25 November, 2020.
  • 61.Zuckerman B, Needlman R. 30 Years of Reach Out and Read: Need for a Developmental Perspective. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20191958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Perrin EC, Sheldrick RC, McMenamy JM, et al. Improving parenting skills for families of young children in pediatric settings: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(1):16–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Woods-Jaeger B, Thompson JE, Foye-Fletcher A, et al. Parent engagement in an integrated care parenting intervention to prevent toxic stress. Clinical practice in pediatric psychology. 2020;8(3):298. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Smith JD, Cruden GH, Rojas LM, et al. Parenting Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2020;146(1):e20193548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Raised with Love and Limits Foundation. Behavior Checker. 2020. Available at: http://www.behaviorchecker.org.Accessed November 23, 2020.
  • 66.WGBH Educational Foundation and Boston Medical Center. Small Moments, Big Impact. 2020. Available at: http://smallmomentsbigimpact.com.Accessed November 23, 2020.
  • 67.Godoy L, Hodgkinson S, Robertson HA, et al. Increasing Mental Health Engagement From Primary Care: The Potential Role of Family Navigation. Pediatrics. 2019;143(4). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chakawa A, Belzer LT, Perez-Crawford T, et al. Which Model Fits? Evaluating Models of Integrated Behavioral Health Care in Addressing Unmet Behavioral Health Needs among Underserved Sociodemographic Groups. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2020;5(3):251–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Babcock ERDL N Families Disrupting the Cycle of Poverty: Coaching with an Intergenerational Lens. Boston: Economic Mobility Pathways. 2016. Available at: http://s3.amazonaws.com/empath-website/pdf/EMPath-Families_Disrupting_the_Cycle_of_Poverty-Intergen-7-12-16.pdf.Accessed November 17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ivanova MY, Dewey L, Swift P, et al. Health Promotion in Primary Care Pediatrics: Initial Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of the Vermont Family Based Approach. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America. 2019;28(2):237–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wissow LS, van Ginneken N, Chandna J, et al. Integrating Children's Mental Health into Primary Care. Pediatric clinics of North America. 2016;63(1):97–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dunne L, Craig N, Connolly P, et al. Community-Based Early Childhood Programmes for Improving Developmental Outcomes for Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Campbell Collaboration. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Aunt Bertha (findhelp.org). Available at: https://findhelp.org.Accessed 26 November, 2020.
  • 74.The Children's Advocacy Project of America. Available at: https://cap4kids.org.Accessed 26 November, 2020.
  • 75.Bair-Merritt MH, Mandal M, Garg A, et al. Addressing Psychosocial Adversity With in the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Expert-Created Measurable Standards. The journal of primary prevention. 2015;36(4):213–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zuckerman B. Two-Generation Pediatric Care: A Modest Proposal. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shah AN, Beck AF, Sucharew HJ, et al. Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences and Resilience on Coping After Discharge. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4):e20172127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hugill M, Berry K, Fletcher I. The association between historical childhood sexual abuse and later parenting stress: a systematic review. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2017;20(2):257–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Numan M. Hypothalamic neural circuits regulating maternal responsiveness toward infants. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews. 2006;5(4):163–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Moehler E, Biringen Z, Poustka L. Emotional availability in a sample of mothers with a history of abuse. The American journal of orthopsychiatry. 2007;77(4):624–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tronick E, Reck C. Infants of depressed mothers. Harvard review of psychiatry. 2009;17(2):147–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES