Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 2021 Aug 23;193(33):E1300–E1302. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202907

Innovations in cancer immunotherapy: chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T)

Kevin Brown 1, Matthew D Seftel 1, Kevin A Hay 1,
PMCID: PMC8412432  PMID: 34426446

KEY POINTS

  • Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is a targeted, gene-edited cell therapy for cancer that is approved in Canada for relapsed or refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

  • Most patients with relapsed refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia have progression-free and overall survival rates better than historical controls, and a small proportion are cured.

  • Acute toxicities of CAR-T are cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and longer-term toxicities include prolonged cytopenias and B-cell aplasia.

  • Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of CAR-T in other malignancies, including solid tumours, are underway.

Cellular immunotherapy is a novel therapy where the body’s own immune cells are harnessed for their anticancer effect. One of the most exciting of these approaches is chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). This therapy is now standard of care for relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the most common malignancy of childhood, and in high-grade B-cell lymphomas, the most common lymphoma in Canada.1 CAR-T is undergoing clinical trials in other cancers.

What is CAR-T?

T cells play a vital role in anticancer surveillance. However, early clinical studies with unmodified T cells showed only modest efficacy. With the advent of genetic engineering techniques, investigators were able to use nonreplicating viral vectors that modify T cells in order to express a “chimeric antigen receptor” (CAR), which provides external specificity for cancer antigens linked to T-cell activation.2 A major breakthrough occurred when CAR-T directed against CD19, a B-cell marker, showed a clinical response in most patients, with long-term responses in a small proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma. This led to US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada approval for these indications.3

How is CAR-T delivered?

The manufacturing and administration of CAR-T is outlined in Figure 1. Various CAR-T products are available, each with variations in the type of viral vector or manufacturing process. Before CAR-T is administered, patients are given a short course of immunosuppressive chemotherapy to allow CAR-T cells to proliferate after infusion. In Canada, CAR-T is administered at blood and marrow transplant centres that care for patients receiving complex cellular therapy.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Process of manufacturing and administration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). 1. The patient’s T cells are collected via apheresis and transported to a manufacturing facility. 2. The patient’s T cells are transduced with a viral vector and allowed to proliferate in vitro. 3. The patient is treated with immunosuppressive chemotherapy while the CAR-T cells are manufactured. 4. The CAR-T cells are transported back to the patient’s centre and infused. 5. The patient is monitored for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurologic syndrome for up to 28 days and monitored long term for B-cell hypoplasia, hypogammaglobulinemia, cytopenias and opportunistic infections. Manufacturing timeline (not to scale) and patient CAR-T cell count are also shown.

Who is eligible for CAR-T?

The therapy is approved in Canada for patients with B-ALL up to age 25 years, who are either refractory to first-line treatment, have relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, or who have had a second or later relapse. It is also approved for adults with relapsed or refractory high-grade B-cell lymphomas who have previously received 2 or more lines of therapy.

What is the evidence so far?

Table 1 summarizes the data on the effectiveness of currently available CAR-T products. Historically, patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL had 1-year survival rates of about 30%; patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma have a median overall survival of 6.2 months with standard chemotherapy approaches.5

Table 1:

Summary of current efficacy data of commercial CAR-T products*

CAR-T product Disease(s) treated Antigen target Survival data
Tisagenlecleucel4,5 B-ALL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma CD19
  • 76% OS at 1 year in B-ALL

  • Median OS of 8.3 mo in high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel6 High-grade B-cell lymphoma CD19 58% OS at 18 mo
Brexucabtagene autoleucel7 Mantle cell lymphoma CD19 83% OS at 1 yr
Idecabtagene vicleucel8 Multiple myeloma BCMA Median PFS of 11.8 mo
Lisocabtagene maraleucel9 High-grade B-cell lymphoma CD19 Median OS of 18.8 mo

Note: B-ALL = B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, BCMA = B-cell maturation antigen, CAR-T = chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, FDA = US Food and Drug Administration, OS = overall survival, PFS = progression-free survival.

*

All diseases treated have relapsed or are refractory. All studies are single-arm, nonrandomized clinical trials.

Health Canada and FDA approval.

FDA approval only.

What are the harms of CAR-T?

In the first month after administration of CAR-T, close clinical monitoring is required for 2 unique toxicities. The first is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which results from the activation of the immune system and expression of inflammatory cytokines.10 Fever is the defining feature, with hypotension and hypoxia characteristic of severe toxicity. In advanced cases, disseminated intravascular coagulation, multi-organ failure and death can occur.10 Both corticosteroids and the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, can ameliorate CRS manifestations. Intensive care unit support may be required for severe cases.10 The second is immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which manifests as word-finding difficulty, aphasia or confusion. Severe ICANS results in decreased level of consciousness, motor impairment and cerebral edema.10 The pathophysiology of ICANS is less well understood than that of CRS. A disturbed blood–brain barrier in the setting of severe systemic inflammation is likely a key process that leads to ICANS. Although CAR-T cells have been found in the cerebrospinal fluid after infusion, it is unclear whether there is direct neurotoxicity as a result of these migrant cells.9 Corticosteroids are the primary treatment for ICANS. Although CRS is a complex and potentially life-threatening syndrome that requires management by a number of different specialists, it is usually self-limiting. Although long-term neurologic sequalae from ICANS have been reported, most cases fully resolve.

Cytokine release syndrome often mimics sepsis, and sepsis can co-occur with CRS, so all patients should be investigated and empirically treated with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in addition to CRS-directed therapy. Immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome has a variable presentation, but all patients should undergo urgent investigation for other possible neurologic causes, such as stroke, with neurology consultation recommended. For any patient within the first month of CAR-T, a cellular therapy physician should be consulted.

Other toxicities of CAR-T include prolonged cytopenias and B-cell hypoplasia, the latter associated with hypogammaglobulinemia and risk of opportunistic infections. Loss of immunity to previously administered vaccinations can occur after immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Primary care physicians must be clinically vigilant in order to recognize opportunistic infections and vaccine-preventable infections in CAR-T patients. Revaccination can typically commence 6 months after CAR-T administration when B-cell reconstitution has occurred. CAR-T is being administered during the current COVID-19 pandemic, with patients consequently at risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. In line with national and international consensus statements, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection is recommended for CAR-T recipients. Given that CAR-T cells are engineered using a non-replicating viral vector, there is no concern for oncogenic transformation.

What can be expected in the future?

Currently, more than 500 clinical trials of CAR-T are registered and actively recruiting patients with various malignant and nonmalignant conditions, showing the rapid pace of innovation in this field. However, substantial challenges currently limit the wider adoption of this therapy. It is expensive, with the 2018 cost of both tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in the United States at US$373 000 when used for high-grade B-cell lymphomas.11 This does not include the costs of supportive care and hospital stay. For lymphoma, an analysis by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health estimated that both tisa-cel and axi-cel at current prices had low probabilities of being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds of Can$50 000 or Can$100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.12,13 In a publicly funded health care system where resource allocation is strained, cost reduction will be necessary in order to meet expanding indications for CAR-T. Across Canada, access to CAR-T remains a challenge, as not all provinces have finalized the complex legal agreements and business plans necessary for implementation and scale-up of the resources needed for CAR-T. As such, products approved by Health Canada are not yet routinely available for many Canadians unless they are referred to other centres, either in Canada or other countries. Novel strategies such as point-of-care manufacturing, in vivo gene delivery to immune cells using nanoparticles (thus circumventing the need for cell manufacturing), and “off the shelf,” allogeneic (i.e., using donor T cells) products are in active development and may reduce cost and access challenges by reducing the costs of individual patient engineering costs.

Footnotes

Competing interests: Matthew Seftel reports receiving consulting fees from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Novartis and Kite/Gilead. Kevin Hay has served as an ad hoc consultant on advisory boards for Kite/Gilead, Celgene/BMS, and Novartis. No other competing interests were declared.

This article has been peer reviewed.

Contributors: All of the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work, drafted the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References


Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES