Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;10:e68240. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68240

Figure 4. Repetition effects on pupil constriction and ERF.

(a) Average pupil size as a function of time post-stimulus onset, z-scored relative to the baseline. A pupillary light reflex to the luminance increase at stimulus onset can be seen. All pupil plots exclude block A because pupil size at the beginning of the experiment was confounded by slow adaptation to the projector illumination (see Figure 4—figure supplement 1a). (b) Same as (a), but averaged for bins of 20 stimulus repetitions each. (c) Blue: Per-repetition average pupil constriction (defined as the per-trial difference between mean pupil size during the 300 ms baseline period and the 0.5–1.2 s post-stimulus period, z-scored within subjects). Violet: Per-repetition stimulus-induced gamma power change in V1/V2 (z-scored within subjects), for comparison. The average and the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals were computed using a five-trial-wide running window. (d) Magnetic dipole moment in V1/V2 in response to stimulus onset, averaged for bins of 20 stimulus repetitions each.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Per-trial changes in pupil constriction and ERF magnitude.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(a) Per-trial average pupil constriction (the difference between pupil size before stimulus onset and 0.5 s–1.2 s after stimulus onset) as a function of trial number. The first block is confounded by ongoing pupil size adaptation to the changed level of ambient light and projector illumination at the beginning of the experiment and was excluded from pupil-size analyses. (b) Per-trial average magnitude of the ERF C1 component (55–70 ms post-stimulus). (c) Per-trial average magnitude of the ERF C2 component (90–180 ms post-stimulus). For plots (a), (b), and (c), values were z-scored within subjects. Average and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals were computed using a five-trial-wide running window within each block.