Abstract
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) has caused significant outbreaks in South-East Asia, particularly in Indonesia in recent years. Recently emerged genotype VII NDVs (NDV-GVII) have shifted their tropism from gastrointestinal/respiratory tropism to a lymphotropic virus, invading lymphoid organs including spleen and bursa of Fabricius to cause profound lymphoid depletion. In this study, we aimed to identify candidate genes and biological pathways that contribute to the disease caused by this velogenic NDV-GVII. A transcriptomic analysis based on RNA-Seq of spleen was performed in chickens challenged with NDV-GVII and a control group. In total, 6361 genes were differentially expressed that included 3506 up-regulated genes and 2855 down-regulated genes. Real-Time PCR of ten selected genes validated the RNA-Seq results as the correlation between them is 0.98. Functional and network analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) showed altered regulation of ElF2 signalling, mTOR signalling, proliferation of cells of the lymphoid system, signalling by Rho family GTPases and synaptogenesis signalling in spleen. We have also identified modified expression of IFIT5, PI3K, AGT and PLP1 genes in NDV-GVII infected chickens. Our findings in activation of autophagy-mediated cell death, lymphotropic and synaptogenesis signalling pathways provide new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of this newly emerged NDV-GVII.
Subject terms: Immunology, Microbiology
Introduction
Newcastle disease virus (NDV) has a worldwide distribution. The NDV causes infection in many different avian species, and it can be considered a permanent threat to all poultry industries and other fields of aviculture1. NDV is capable of causing devastating infection for over 240 species of birds that can spillover through direct contact between healthy and infected birds2,3. NDV was first reported in Java, Indonesia in 1926 and then spread to the rest of the world. Various genotypes have been responsible for different ND panzootics4. Most recent ND outbreaks in Southeast Asia are mainly caused by highly virulent NDV-GVII leading to 70–80% mortality in commercial chickens, including vaccinated flocks5,6. While genotype VII NDVs includes a wide variety of sub-genotypes, the fourth and the fifth ND panzootic in Africa, Europe, Middle East and Asia were caused by genotype VII.1.1 (b, d, e, j, l) and VII.2 (a, h, i, k), respectively6–8.
NDV is a member of the genus avian orthoavulavirus 1 within a new subfamily Avulavirinae of the family Paramyxoviridae7. NDV has a negative-sense single-stranded, and non-segmented RNA genome that encodes six major structural protein genes in the order 3′-NP-P-M-F-HN-L-5′9. According to the clinical signs in infected chickens, different strains of NDV have been separated into five groups10: (1) Viscerotropic velogenic strains causing acute lethal infections, usually causing haemorrhagic lesions in the intestines; (2) neurotropic velogenic strains causing high mortality with neurological disease followed by respiratory symptoms without gut lesions; (3) mesogenic strains causing low mortality with respiratory and neurological signs; (4) lentogenic strains causing mild infections of the respiratory tract without any lesions in the intestinal tract; and (5) avirulent strains that replicate in the intestine with no clinical signs. Avirulent strains are often used as live vaccines6. Phylogenetic analysis of the fusion protein gene of NDVs indicates that circulating strains in Indonesia are belonging to genotype VII.1 with a mean death time (MDT) from 33 and 30 h as their pathogenicity index9,11,12. These findings also indicate that these circulating strains are clinically categorised as velogenic. In this study, we have used one of these genotype VII NDV strains in our challenge experiment in order to analyse pathogenesis of this newly emerged NDV11. The amino acid composition of cleavage site of the fusion protein and its susceptibility to host trypsin-like proteases plays a big role in pathogenicity, spread of infection, and tissue tropism of NDVs13. Mucosal immunity is heavily involved in the host response to ND infection. Trachea, Harderian glands and lung are places for early virus/host contact at points of entry. These tissues are strategic sites to examine host–pathogen interaction and early viral shedding. Several studies investigated the transcriptome of these tissues infected by NDV14–19. In order to increase understanding of the immune response to NDV, the gene expression profile of other immune organs should also be considered. Recent in vivo studies revealed differential regulation of immune response to the lentogenic strain of NDV (LaSota) by transcriptome analysis in the spleen20,21. Another in vitro study compared transcript profile of highly virulent Herts/33 strain and nonvirulent LaSota strain in spleen cells22. The transcriptomic analysis of infection caused by newly emerged virulent NDV-GVII has not been investigated in previous studies.
Cell death has been divided into three categories: (1) type I cell death or apoptosis; (2) type II cell death or necrosis; (3) type III cell death or autophagy23. Apoptosis is critical in both physiological and pathological conditions and is known as a multi-pathway process, which can lead to programmed cell death. Apoptosis is associated with many types of viral infections and, depending on the circumstances, can act to increase or decrease viral production. Apoptosis is a hallmark of cytotoxicity in virus-infected cells with NDV strains that can trigger both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways24, and numerous in-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown that NDV can trigger the apoptosis process25–28. Different studies have shown that infection with the virulent strains of NDV will increase the apoptosis in lymphoid tissue and immune cells25,29–31. Severe splenic disruption, massive lymphoid depletion, ulceration of the intestinal epithelium and rapid depletion of the bursa of Fabricius have been described in association with these strains25,29–32. Other members of Paramyxoviridae family such as Rinderpest33, canine distemper, measles34–36, and porcine Rubulavirus37 similarly targeting the host lymphoid tissues. An important difference between apoptosis and necrosis is that apoptosis does not incite inflammation28.
The amino acid sequence motif 112RRQKRF117 of fusion protein has been previously indicated as the pathogenic genetic markers of virulent NDV5,38,39. Our previous studies have discovered and reported two different sub-genotypes of NDV GVII that contain RRQKRF motif in Mega strain and RRRKRF in Cimanglid and VD strains9,11,12. The Mega strain used in our challenge experiment carries the RRQKRF motif sequence in the fusion protein, and has been reported as pathonenicity indicator of the NDV even in genetically modified lentogenic strains40,41. In addition to these references, the Mega strain has been isolated from a brain of a dead chicken11. Based on all of the evidences, we were expecting to observe neurological lesions and respiratory symptoms as the classical symptoms of virulent NDV strains. Surprisingly, the virus load at the central nervous system of experimentally infected chickens was low or even zero in qPCR tests, while massive lymphoid depletion and high virus load were observed in studied chickens.. In this study, we aimed to identify the molecular basis of pathogenesis of newly emerged NDV-GVII using mRNA profiling of spleen tissues in experimentally infected chickens. To do that, we have focused on cell death related pathways and functional analysis of genes to reveal their potential roles in massive cellular depletion in spleen lymphoid tissues. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study investigating gene expression profile of this velogenic strain.
Results
Detection of virus shed in challenged group
To examine effects of virus on experimentally challenged birds, the Ross broiler Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) chickens were inoculated with a genotype VII NDV. Due to the severe sickness caused by the virus in challenged group, experiment terminated by euthanising of all birds at 2 dpi and a cloacal swab has also been taken from all birds including control group. The results of absolute quantification for detection of viral fusion gene in samples by qPCR confirmed that all the birds inoculated with NDV-GVII became infected and shed virus at 2 dpi. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of the challenge group (16.9, SD = 1.22) was lower than the control group (41.9 SD = 2.92) (F = 967.4, df = 14, p < 0.001), which indicated viral shedding in the challenged group while there was no detection of NDV in control group.
Gene expression changes induced by NDV infection
Sequencing of constructed libraries from RNA samples resulted 400 million of 100-bp paired end reads. Similar percentages of reads from each sample (on average 76%) were mapped to the GRCg6a reference genome in the Ensembl database and could be counted as a gene feature by the software Feature Count (Table 1). Of the 24,362 annotated genes in the reference genome, 14,664 (~ 60%) genes were considered as expressed after our count per million cut-off criteria. By applying the FDR p-value cut-off of 0.05 and log2 fold change more than 1, our analysis revealed 6361 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). 3506 genes were upregulated, and 2855 genes were downregulated DEGs (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. 1). Non-coding RNA transcripts are about 90% of the eukaryotic genome and do not follow the central dogma for the flow of genetic information in cells. Although several studies aimed to analyse their existence, a significant challenge exists in terms of their molecular functions and mechanisms of action42. One of the rapidly expanding fields of this class of transcripts is the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). A considerable number of transcripts (732) of lncRNA has been detected in our analysis, and interestingly, 513 of these transcripts had the highest (LFC is < − 3 or > 3) change in expression (Supplementary Table S2). None of the studied genes were included in our analysis due to the lack of a chicken-based biological pathway database for gene expression analysis.
Table 1.
Sample | Raw count | Cleaned count | Mapping % |
---|---|---|---|
Control 1 | 291,052,64 | 268,792,54 | 88.34 |
Control 2 | 113,657,819 | 102,102,063 | 87.89 |
Control 3 | 413,589,26 | 387,238,58 | 88.54 |
Challenged 1 | 915,321,41 | 872,570,38 | 90.42 |
Challenged 2 | 145,682,503 | 137,041,556 | 88.67 |
Challenged 3 | 140,667,468 | 125,491,032 | 90.23 |
The mapping percentage was calculated as the number of reads mapped to the reference genome divided by the number of cleaned count reads.
Based on functional importance genes known to be involved in cell death23,43, ten genes were selected from our DEGs list to validate the RNA-Seq data. The selected genes were covered the full range of log2 fold change (log2 FC) and measured their expression level in qPCRs. The log2 FC obtained from RNA-Seq data analysis was compared to the log2 FC obtained in qPCRs. Figure 2 shows a comparison between the result of qPCR and RNA-Seq data. The expression patterns obtained from qPCR results for all ten selected genes were similar to their patterns from RNA-Seq analysis, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.98. These results confirming the reliability of the RNA-Seq data for gene expression patterns. Functional analysis of 6361 DEGs detected in NDV challenged chickens with IPA indicated the roles in immune response (specifically in early stage of splenic response) to the infection for most of top DEGs with z-score more than 3 (Table 2). Due to the use of human- and mouse-based database by IPA for analysis, the types and the functions of some of chicken genes have not been indicated properly. Further investigation into the functions of these uncharacterised proteins and genes would be useful to provide more insight into their contribution to infection. A list of DEGs with consistent responses in expression to NDV infection was released by Zhang et al.21. Comparison of DEGs in our study with Zhang et al. revealed 23 shared genes (Table 3). Thirteen (56%) of these shared genes had consistent expression change in our study and study of spleen of Hy-Line Brown birds21, spleen20,44,45, Harderian gland16,19, lung17, Trachea18 or embryo46 of Fayoumi or Leghorn chickens challenged with lentogenic NDV. Particularly, interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 5 (IFIT5) showed significant up-regulation in the spleen of all chickens challenged with virulent and non-virulent NDVs. However, 10 (44%) of these shared significant DEGs had opposite regulation in our study, suggesting a quite different response to virulent NDV infections.
Table 2.
Symbol | Function of genea | LFCb | FDRc | Type(s) | HGNCd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGT | Angiotensinogen | 14.366 | 0.0009 | Growth factor | 183 |
CAMK2A | Calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II alpha | 10.169 | 0.0008 | Kinase | 815 |
CAMKV | CaM kinase like vesicle associated | 10.958 | 0.0101 | Kinase | 79,012 |
ELOVL2 | ELOVL fatty acid elongase 2 | 10.402 | 0.0019 | Enzyme | 54,898 |
GABRA3 | Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subunit alpha3 | 10.432 | 0.0006 | Ion channel | 2556 |
GFAP | Glial fibrillary acidic protein | 12.885 | 0.0004 | Other | 2670 |
GPM6A | Glycoprotein M6A | 12.11 | 0.0020 | Ion channel | 2823 |
IRX1 | Iroquois homeobox 1 | 10.723 | 0.0026 | Transcription regulator | 79,192 |
MMD2 | Monocyte to macrophage differentiation associated 2 | 11.067 | 0.0016 | Kinase | 221,938 |
PACSIN1 | Protein kinase C and casein kinase substrate in neurons 1 | 10.774 | 0.0009 | Kinase | 29,993 |
PADI3 | Peptidyl arginine deiminase 3 | 10.267 | 0.0005 | Enzyme | 51,702 |
PLP1 | Proteolipid protein 1 | 13.157 | 0.0003 | Other | 5354 |
SLC15A2 | Solute carrier family 15 member 2 | 10.478 | 0.0022 | Transporter | 6565 |
SLC1A3 | Solute carrier family 1 member 3 | 13.277 | 0.0011 | Transporter | 6507 |
SLC6A11 | Solute carrier family 6 member 11 | 11.937 | 0.0014 | Transporter | 6538 |
TTLL2 | Tubulin tyrosine ligase like 2 | 10.69 | 0.0016 | Other | 83,887 |
aIPA software was used to obtain gene’s function from the transcript identifier.
bLFC, Log twofold change.
cFDR, false discovery rate.
dHGNC, Human Gene Nomenclature Committee.
Table 3.
Gene name | Function | LFC in this study at 2 dpi | Comparison with response in other NDV studies |
---|---|---|---|
PLCXD1 | Phosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase C X domain containing 1 | 0.47 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and Harderian gland of leghorn at 6 dpi19 |
SLBP | Stem-loop binding protein | 0.85 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and spleen20 and trachea18 of leghorn at 2 dpi |
OSTM1 | Osteoclastogenesis associated transmembrane protein 1 | 1.00 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 2 dpi18 |
DRAM1 | DNA damage regulated autophagy modulator 1 | 1.40 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and Trachea of fayoumi and leghorn at 2 dpi18 |
PARP12 | Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family member 12 | 1.48 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and harderian gland at 2 and 6 dpi19, in spleen at 2 dpi20 in leghorn |
SNX10 | Sorting nexin 10 | 1.90 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and spleen20 and trachea18 of leghorn at 2 dpi |
IFIT5 | Interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 5 | 6.09 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and spleen of leghorn at 144, 220,44and 6 dpi20, and of fayoumi at 2 dpi20 |
P2RX1 | Purinergic receptor P2X 1 | − 5.62 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and lung of fayoumi at 10 dpi17 |
KAZALD1 | Kazal type serine peptidase inhibitor domain 1 | − 3.46 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 6 dpi18 |
HPSE2 | Heparanase 2 (inactive) | − 2.61 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 2 dpi18 |
UROC1 | Urocanate hydratase 1 | − 2.52 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and harderian gland of leghorn at 6 dpi19 |
ROR1 | Receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 1 | − 1.66 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and lung of fayoumi at 2 dpi17 |
FSHR | Follicle stimulating hormone receptor | − 0.46 | Consistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 6 dpi18 |
AICDA | Activation induced cytidine deaminase | − 8.98 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 6 dpi18 |
P2RY8 | P2Y receptor family member 8 | − 3.24 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and harderian gland at 6 dpi19 and trachea at 2 and 6 dpi18 in leghorn |
ARHGAP15 | Rho GTPase activating protein 15 | − 1.85 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of fayoumi at 2 dpi and leghorn at 2 and 6 dpi18 |
ASNS | Asparagine synthetase (glutamine-hydrolyzing) | − 0.58 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and harderian gland of leghorn at 6 dpi19 |
TRIM24 | Tripartite motif containing 24 | − 0.57 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 6 dpi18 |
CDC42SE2 | CDC42 small effector 2 | − 0.37 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of fayoumi at 2 dpi18 |
BFAR | Bifunctional apoptosis regulator | − 0.36 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of fayoumi and leghorn at 2 dpi18 |
ST3GAL4 | ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4 | 0.28 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and harderian gland of leghorn at 6 dpi under heat stress16 |
MYH10 | Myosin heavy chain 10 | 0.29 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown at 2 dpi21 and trachea of leghorn at 6 dpi18 |
EPHB1 | EPH receptor B1 | 0.32 | Inconsistent with spleen of Hy-line brown21 and trachea of fayoumi at 2 dpi18 |
Ingenuity pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes
The DEGs list created from transcriptome analysis (p < 0.05, log2 fold change ≥ 1) was used as input for IPA analysis. IPA uses a Fisher’s exact test p-value cut of 0.05 and an absolute z-score cut-off of 2 or greater for pathways to consider them as significantly enriched. In this study, we focused on the pathways engaged in cell death and injury pathways. Overall canonical pathways, upstream regulators, disease and biological functions that were predicted by IPA to be activated are shown in Fig. 3. Inhibition of IL2 and downregulation of EIF2 signalling as an upstream regulator, resulted in the inhibition of B lymphocytes, the number of cells of the lymphoid system, mononuclear leukocytes and proliferation of cells of the lymphoid system. Inhibition of these processes may result in depletion in immune cells and lymphatic tissue destruction in spleen observed in spleen in challenged chicken with virulent NDV-GVII. IPA predicted upregulation of ATF4 that resulted in activation of synaptogenesis signalling pathway, CREB signalling in neurons and neuropathic pain signalling in dorsal horn neurons in our analysis. Several pathways were significantly impacted by the challenge with virulent NDV as predicted by IPA. Top pathways are shown in Fig. 4 and a list of all altered pathways provided in Supplementary Table S3. Overall, many of these pathways lead to cell death and immune response to infection. In particular, Elf2 and mTOR signalling was on top of our downregulated pathways. mTOR signalling activates autophagy and increased autophagy assistances NDV replication47. ElF2 pathway results in inhibition of viral replication through inhibition of translation of viral proteins and increased apoptosis in infected cells48. Reduced autophagy and increased apoptosis would help infected cells with the virus. IPA also predicted activation of signalling by Rho family GTPases, CREB signalling in Neurons and synaptogenesis pathway.
Zhang et al. study has recently reported 31 pathways with consistent expression response to non-virulent strains of NDV21. Comparison of predicted pathways in our study with impacted pathways by lentogenic NDVs, revealed 16 shared pathways (Table 4). Significant downregulation (z score < − 2) of 5 (31%) of the shared pathways in our study was in agreement with a study of NDV infection caused by a lentogenic strain in spleens of Hy-Line Brown chickens21. However, significant activation of these pathways has been reported in lung17, Harderian gland19 and trachea18 of Fayoumi and Leghorn chicken challenged with lentogenic strain of NDV. Eleven (68%) of these shared pathways also have not been significantly impacted (z score > − 2 or < 2) by virulent NDV in our study, while Zhang et al.21 and Deist et al.17,18 studies reported significant activation and inhibition of these pathways respectively in the response of lentogenic NDV. These findings suggest a different response of the immune system to virulent and non-virulent NDV in different tissues. Analysis of disease biomarkers in our results revealed functions associated with virulent NDV (Table 5). A decrease in proliferation of cells of the lymphoid system, quantity of B lymphocytes and quantity of mononuclear leukocytes are predicted by IPA using Ingenuity Knowledge Base approach49. Inhibition of these pathways together may contribute to the massive depletion of lymphoid cells in spleen observed in experimentally infected birds. However, an increase in microtubule dynamics is also predicted to be associated with NDV infection. Upregulation of key genes such as angiotensinogen (AGT) and proteolipid protein 1 (PLP1) contributed to both activated and inhibited pathways.
Table 4.
zPathways | z-Score (current study) | IPA prediction in other studies using non-virulent NDV | |
---|---|---|---|
Inhibition | Activation | ||
TNFR2 signalling | − 3.00 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
TNFR1 signalling | − 2.32 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
GP6 signalling pathway | − 2.23 | Spleen21 | Harderian gland19 |
Leukocyte extravasation signalling | − 2.21 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
Production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in macrophages | − 2.02 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages and monocytes | − 1.54 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
Tec kinase signalling | − 1.50 | Spleen21 | Lung17, trachea18 |
B cell receptor signalling | − 1.13 | Spleen21 | trachea18 |
Integrin signalling | − 0.92 | Spleen21 | Lung17 |
IL-8 signalling | − 0.53 | Spleen21 | Lung17, trachea18 |
CD40 signalling | − 0.42 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
Thrombin signalling | − 0.12 | Spleen21 | Lung17 |
IL-6 signalling | 0.18 | Spleen21 | Trachea18 |
P2γ purigenic receptor signalling pathway | 0.88 | Spleen21 | Lung17 |
Relaxin signalling | 1.00 | Spleen21 | Lung17 |
Ephrin receptor signalling | 1.76 | Spleen21 | Lung17 |
Minus z-score means inhibition and positive z-score means activation.
Table 5.
Disease and functions | Contributed DEGs for prediction | z-Score | No. |
---|---|---|---|
Proliferation of cells of the lymphoid system | PLP1, SOX2, GAD2, UNC119, APOH, GAD1, MBP, ADCYAP1, FOXJ1, TYR | − 3.571 | 168 |
Quantity of B lymphocytes | SLCO1A2, F3, ST6GALNAC2, FZD9, HGF, PLCD1, ESR1, BST1, ABL1, STAT1 | − 2.769 | 93 |
Quantity of lymphocytes tissue |
GAD2, NPY, SLC4A4, FADS2, FOXC2, PCSK1, YES1, ESR1 ABL1, MXI1 |
− 2.402 | 89 |
Quantity of mononuclear leukocytes |
AGT, PLP1, GAD2, MBP, ADCYAP1, SLCO1A2, F3 SNCA, NPY, SLC4A4 |
− 2.785 | 172 |
Microtubule dynamics | AGT, GPM6A, PACSIN1, CAMK2A, SOX2, PHGDH, RFX4, SLC39A12, GRIN1, SNCB | 4.311 | 245 |
Bold italic and italic text indicates upregulated and downregulated DEGs respectively. Genes are sorted ascendingly from left to right based on their fold change. No. means the number of DEGs in our data contributed to disease production.
Discussion
Understanding the molecular basis of pathogenesis of newly emerged NDVs will provide more reliable information on how these viruses produce unique pathological features in infected chickens, even in vaccinated flocks8. These information will provide more clear view on further vaccine development for protection of Newcastle disease worldwide. Gene expression pattern analysis helps to understand the virus and host interactions. Several in vivo and in vitro studies investigated gene expression in different tissues from experimentally infected chickens with different genotypes of NDV17–22. However, the molecular pathogenesis of genotype VII of NDVs has not been well described especially in in vivo studies. Herein, RNA-Seq and bioinformatics analyses were employed to study spleen transcriptome in experimentally infected birds with highly virulent NDV-GVII.
The viral strains used in this study were even more virulent than anticipated. The SPF chickens were inoculated via intranasal or intraocular rout with 102 EID50 of GVII NDV and mortality began within 1 day after virus inoculation. The study had to be terminated on the second day, due to severe sickness of the birds and mortality.
In comparison, Alexander et al.50 inoculated poults with 106 EID50 viscerotropic velogenic NDV-GIV (a 10,000 fold greater comparative dose), and clinical signs did not begin until the second day, with some birds surviving for 4 days50.
The spleen plays a critical role in early stage of the host defence response to NDV. Gene expression profile analysis of spleen provides insights into host immune defence. Splenic cells produce alpha and beta interferon and interleukin 6 (IL‐6) within the first 6 h of exposure of chickens to virulent NDV51. Spleen also has an important role in T cell immune response and lymphocyte transformation in immune response to NDV infection52.
In this study, a higher number of differentially expressed genes (> 6000) were found when compared to in vivo studies of nonvirulent NDV17,18. Liu et al. reported 8433 DEGs in chick embryo fibroblasts (CEFs) infected with virulent Herts/33 strain22. Regardless of the fundamental differences with our study, both studies showed similar patterns of gene expression with high number of DEGs in the response to virulent NDVs.
IPA predicted inhibition of mTOR and EIF2 signalling and placed them on top 10 pathways altered by NDV infection in our list. mTOR signalling regulates CD8 T cell differentiation53, and induces Toll-like receptor-mediated IFNA1 in plasmacytoid dendritic cells and has a negative control role in autophagy-mediated cell death after viral infection54,55. mTOR signalling activates autophagy and an increased autophagy benefits NDV replication47. EIF2 signalling has been known as a viral replication inhibitor and proinflammatory cytokine expression regulator56. EIF2 pathways inhibits translation of virus and increases apoptosis in infected cells, resulting in inhibition of viral replication48. Downregulation of these pathways indicates the host’s immune response in preventing of viral replication in infected cells. Deist et al. reported downregulation of EIF2 pathway in lung of challenged Fayoumis with lentogenic NDV at 10 dpi17. However, different pattern of activation of EIF2 signalling pathway were reported in trachea and spleen of challenged birds with non-virulent NDV at 2 dpi18, and viral shedding were not reported in these studies. Considering the crucial role of these pathways in inhibition of viral replication, downregulation of viral replication pathways may indicate that the host used this strategy to defend itself from the virulent NDVs.
Our IPA analysis also indicated the downregulation of some shared immune pathways with other in vivo NDV infections21. IL-8 signalling has a vital role during infectious disease by regulation of chemotaxis and activation of neutrophils57. IL-15 production also facilitates homeostasis, development of natural killer cells and CD8 T cells during anti-viral response58. Tec kinase signalling pathway has also critical role in response to viral infection and is essential for differentiation and development of CD4+59 and CD8+ T cell60. IL-2 has a critical role in activation of NK cells, lymphocyte proliferation and clearance of intracellular pathogens in chickens61,62. Inhibition of these share pathways and especially IL-2, as a key upstream regulator in our study, suggests a suppressed immune response caused by this newly emerged NDV-GVII.
Most of the top upregulated genes indicated in our RNA transcriptome were involved in the immune response to the infection in spleen. AGT and PLP1 both are associated with increased quantity of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell63. GPM6A has a role in the expression of human GPM6A mRNA in marginal-zone B lymphocytes expressing human CD27 protein and human IgD complex64. Upregulation of AGT and PLP1 in our study contributed in disease production that resulted in massive depletion of spleen.
Previous studies reported tissue-specific immune response65 and breed specific immune gene expression in chickens66. Our results indicate small portion and also opposite regulation of shared significant DEGs with previous in vivo studies of lentogenic NDV. These differences may be due to infection caused by a virulent NDV in our study and emphasise the host's different immune response to the virulent and non-virulent viruses.
Our result shows activation of pathways that regulate cellular actin such as signalling by Rho family GTPases resulting an activated microtubule dynamics pathway. The critical role of this pathway in cell–cell fusion and syncytium formation in pathogenesis of paramyxoviruses that helps virus entry to the host cell has been reported by Gower et al.67. These results may suggest that NDV as a paramyxovirus, facilitates viral replication and infection by activation of this pathway.
IPA analysis also pointed out activation of synaptogenesis signalling in our results. This pathway plays a critical role in development of nervous system by regulation of synapse formation between neurons68.
Gastrointestinal lesions and severe atrophy of the lymphoid organs due to necrosis and depletion of the lymphocytes has been reported in the infection caused by the velogenic viscerotropic NDVs69,70. Severe lymphocytic destruction in the lymphoid organs can also lead to immunosuppression in survived chicken from NDV infection71. Severe atrophy of the spleen has been described in other immunosuppressive disease of chickens such as infectious bursal disease72,73. Our IPA analysis indicate a decreased quantity of lymphoid tissue and inhibited proliferation of cells of the lymphoid system, which was in agreement with our gross pathology observation of lymphocyte depletion in spleen. These evidences may supports possible immunosuppressive effects of this strain.
Activation of pathways that results in development of synapses in nervous system and depletion of lymphoid tissue suggests possible the host response to this strain. More in situ detection and analysis of viral antigens in different tissues of infected birds is necessary for comprehensively understanding of the tissue tropism of this newly emerged virulent NDV.
On the other hand, our results indicate genes with consistent expression regulation in different studies with many varied experimental factors such as virulence of virus, tissue and breed and time point sampling. This suggests a universal role of these genes in immune response to NDV. One of the most significant genes is IFIT5, which is an interferon-stimulated gene and its critical role for innate immune defence against virus has been confirmed74. IFIT5 recognises and inhibits translation of viral RNA bearing a 5′-triphosphate75, and also has a key regulator role in activation of B-cells by positive regulation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer in NF-кB signalling pathway76. Overexpression of IFIT5 in transgenic chickens showed significant enhanced resistance to avian influenza and velogenic NDV77. Consistent up-regulation of IFIT5 in the spleen of all chickens challenged with virulent and non-virulent NDV indicates critical role of this gene in splenic immune response to viral infections.
Compared to the great importance of NDV to the poultry industry and its effects on international trade, there is a relatively modest number of published infectious challenge experiments in which virulent virus has been administered to chickens. In vivo experiments using virulent NDV require specialised animal PC3 facilities which are expensive to build and operate. Rapid progression of induced disease can make it difficult to sample birds over multiple days post infection. In the present study, we had intended to sample birds at 48 and 72 h post-inoculation. However, we decided to humanely kill them all at 48 h post challenge due to severe clinical signs of disease and high mortality that were already increasing within 24 h. The reduced quality of RNA extracted from infected birds in comparison with healthy birds was another limitation of this study that was an unavoidable consequence of destruction of the host transcriptome during the acute phase of paramyxovirus infection78.
Conclusion
This is the first study of gene expression profiling of spleen tissue of experimentally infected chickens with a virulent NDV-GVII. In conclusion, we observed extensive alteration of gene expression in response to this strain in the spleen of chickens. Multiple comparisons of gene expression profile of spleen between this study and previous studies of lentogenic NDV infections indicates differences between DEGs and activation pathway patterns, indicating the role of virulence of virus in immune responses. Activation of autophagy-mediated cell death, lymphotropic and synaptogenesis development pathways after viral infection suggests a new tissue tropism for genotype VII NDVs. Further in vivo study of these virulent NDV strains in chickens is needed to more comprehensively reveal the molecular pathogenesis of these newly emerged virulent strains of NDV.
Materials and methods
Viruses
The challenge strain used in this study (Mega) has previously been characterised by measuring the MDT index according to standard OIE manual procedures10. The mean death time (MDT) of the isolate was 30 h that classified the isolate as virulent or velogenic viruses11. In brief, ten-fold serial dilution between 10−6 and 10−9 of the virus was made in sterile PBS. A hundred microliters of each dilution were inoculated into the allantoic cavity of each of five 9-day-old embryonated SPF chicken eggs and incubate at 37 °C, monitored twice a day for 7 days. The time for any embryo deaths was recorded, and the minimum lethal dose that caused death in all embryos was calculated. The minimum lethal dose (MDT) is the highest dilution of the virus that causes death in all the embryos79. In our case, the MDT for the Mega strain of NDV was 30 h.
Challenge experiment
Animal experiments were performed at the Indonesian research centre for veterinary science (Bbalitvet), Bogor, Indonesia. The animal ethics was approved by the research and animal ethics committee of Bbalitvet institute with reference number of AH/2015/003. An experienced veterinarian managed the challenge experiment in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia and the Animal Research Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines 2.0. Twenty, 1-day old SPF broiler Ross chickens sourced from Caprifarmindo Laboratories (Bandung, Indonesia) were divided into two groups of 10 and raised in isolator units at biosafety level 3 (BLS3) biocontainment at Bbalitvet. Chickens were allocated randomly into two isolators and tagged individually. At 35 days of age, the birds were inoculated by intraocular and intranasal instillation with100µL of 100 EID5050,80 of live Mega strain of NDV (accession number of MN688613)11. One group of 10 birds was kept as a negative control in isolator 2.
Tissue collection and RNA extraction
Following viral challenge, birds were monitored twice a day for clinical signs of ND. Dead birds were collected and sampled immediately, and those with severe clinical signs of disease were euthanised and counted as mortalities for that day. Due to death or severe sickness of chickens in the challenged group, the experiment was terminated at 2 day post infection (2 dpi), and the birds in all groups were euthanised by cervical dislocation. After opening of the carcass, all tissue sample were collected from freshly necropsied chicken and immediately divided into four pieces for four different experiments (histopathology, virus isolation, RNA isolation and backup). The tissues for RNA extracting were immediately frozen in sterile tubes on dry ice and transferred either to RNA later or to Trizol reagent (Ambion, Thermo Fisher, MA, USA). In total, twenty RNA samples from spleens of challenged and control groups were isolated using a mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Thermo Fisher, Lithuania). To remove the genomic DNA residue, the isolated RNA was treated with DNase using a DNA-free kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA quality was assessed by Agilent 2200 TapeStation instrument, (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and confirmed as RNA Integrity Number (RIN) > 5 for all samples.
Detection of virus shedding in challenged and control chickens
A cloacal swab sample was taken from each chicken, and viral RNA extracted from cloacal swab samples using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Louisville, KY, USA) and quantified using NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Five microliters of extracted RNA was converted to cDNA using a QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Louisville, KY, USA) as per manufacturer’s instruction. For detection of viral load in samples, an absolute quantification method used in qRT-PCR. NDV-Fusion-Forward: AAAGTGGTGACACAGGTCGG, and NDV-Fusion-Reverse primer: CCGATGTATTGCCGCTCAAG used for amplification of a 145 bp amplicon. A QuantiFast SYBR® Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Louisville, KY, USA) was used in a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in an Illumina, Eco Real-Time PCR machine (California USA). The reaction was run in triplicate for each qPCR with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The Ct values greater than 35 in viral samples were considered negative81. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was undertaken to test for mean differences in CT values. The results were analysed in IBM SPSS (v 26.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
RNA sequencing
After the initial assessments and the quality control of the RNA samples, three RNA samples from the challenged group and three RNA samples from the negative control group with RIN > 5 were selected for the further analysis. The selected samples were submitted to Australian Genome Research Facility for RNA sequencing. Sequencing libraries were prepared with the TruSeq RNA Library Predation kit as per the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform.
Transcriptome analysis
Raw RNA-Seq paired end reads were checked for quality using FASTQC v0.11.482 and trimmed with TrimGalore v0.4.283 to a minimum length of 150 bp per read and Phred score of 10. Sequencing adapters were removed with AdapterRemoval v2.2.184. Cleaned reads were mapped to the chicken reference genome (GRCg6a) using Hisat2 v2.1.085. Mapped reads were sorted with SAMtools v1.886. Then, sorted mapped reads were summarised using FeatureCounts87 at the gene level using Ensembl annotation version 97. The Voom-limma pipeline88,89 was used to analyse samples grouped by infection status using the gene-level read counts as input. Briefly, the pipeline involved the removal of lowly expressed genes, i.e. genes meeting the requirement of count per million (CPM) more than one in at least three samples. The counts were normalised by log-transforming the counts per million to standardise for differences in library size. Counts were also normalised using trimmed mean of M values (TMM) method90 to avoid bias from different coverage, and samples and individual observational level of each expressed genes were weighted using Voom89 to account for heterogeneity in their expression level. Moderated t-statistics tests were used to define differential expression levels between samples. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between groups with different infection status were tested and ranked based on the false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05.
Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with FDR < 0.05 were analysed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (IPA, QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, USA), and pathways or functions with z-score > 2 were considered to be activated or inhibited49.
Validation of RNA-Seq data
Applied Biosystems Real-Time PCR System comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) assay was used to validate RNA-Seq results. Gene expression measured in all tissues samples in challenged and control groups (n = 20). For each sample, cDNA was prepared from 1 μg of RNA using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Melbourne, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. PowerTrack SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) was used to prepare PCR master mix in a 20 μL reaction volume as per the manufacturer’s protocol and 2 μL of the cDNA was added into each reaction well (in triplicate) using a robot (Ep Motion 5075 Robot system, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). Thermocycling conditions in ABI Quant Studio 6 Flex thermal cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) were polymerase activation at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 60 s. A melting curve step from a ramp of 50–99 °C was included to assess the specificity of amplification. Based on their log2 FC (LFC) in RNA-Seq analysis, we selected ten genes that cover the full range of LFC in the comparisons between treatments and control group, and the functional importance of each gene in cell death has also been considered23,43. These primers are listed in Table 6. The primers were designed by NCBI primer tool with amplicons around 100 bp and spanning multiple exons specified also applied to avoid amplification of genomic DNA. uMelt web-based tool used for prediction of DNA melting curves and denaturation profile of PCR products for assessment of specific amplification of primers91. Amplifications of a series of five, ten-fold dilution of cDNA used for determination of PCR amplification efficiencies and correlation coefficients (R)92–95. The geometric mean of Ct values of YWHAZ and TBP housekeeping genes, that are more stably expressed in the spleen of chicken challenged with pathogens96,97, were used for normalisation of the data. Data were analysed using the Quant Studio Real-Time PCR Analysis software. Replicates of the same sample showing a shifted peak in melting curves were removed. Gene expression was compared between control and treatment groups using the 2(− ΔΔCt) method, and Pearson Correlation Coefficient between LFC in qPCR assay and RNA-Seq data were calculated, using the GraphPad prism software version 8.4.2 (GraphPad Software, LLC, San Diego, CA, USA).
Table 6.
Gene symbol | Primer sequence (5'–3') | Exon junction (bp) | Fragment size (bp) | Annealing °C | PCR efficiency (%) | Correlation coefficient (R) | Slop | NCBI accession | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APAF1 | F: GGTCAATTGCTGCCAGTTCA | 2316/2317 (reverse primer) | 94 | 60 | 129 | 0.9539 | − 2.76 | XM_416167.6 | This study |
R: TCCTTCAAATCCCAAAGTTTGAT | |||||||||
CASP3 | F: GCAGACAGTGGACCAGATGA | 90/91 (reverse primer) | 94 | 60 | 166 | 0.9502 | − 2.349 | XM_015276122.2 | This study |
R: AGGAGTAGTAGCCTGGAGCA | |||||||||
CYCS | F: CGTGGGCGCATTTACTGACA | 107/108 (forward primer) | 81 | 60 | 130 | 0.9650 | − 2.759 | XM_015281453.2 | This study |
R: CCGTATGGCACTGGGAACAT | |||||||||
CASP9 | F: CGGAACCTCAAAGCTCAGGAAA | 667/668 (forward primer) | 99 | 60 | 158 | 0.9524 | − 2.425 | XM_424580.6 | This study |
R: ATGGGAGAGGATGACCACGA | |||||||||
PMAIP1 | F: GCCTGCAGAGCGGGAC | 114/115 (forward primer) | 89 | 60 | 130 | 0.9580 | − 2.756 | NM_001302097.1 | This study |
R: GGTTCAGGACTTTCTGCTGC | |||||||||
TP53INP1 | F: ACACTGGCACAACTGGAGG | 813/814 (forward primer) | 72 | 60 | 157 | 0.9520 | − 2.429 | XM_015282925.2 | This study |
R: GGTAGGAAGAGCTGCGACAA | |||||||||
TP53INP2 | F: ATCGAGCTTGGAGAAGAGCC | 527/528 (forward primer) | 96 | 60 | 181 | 0.9418 | − 2.227 | XM_015296284.2 | This study |
R: GGTGACGTAGACGGACATGC | |||||||||
TP53BP2 | F: CTGTGCAAGGAACCTGGTGA | 326/327 (reverse primer) | 74 | 60 | 152 | 0.9469 | − 2.483 | XM_419394.6 | This study |
R: TCGGCTATAGGCCGTTCTGA | |||||||||
CLTA | F: CTAGCAACAGGGTGGCAGAT | 615/616 (reverse primer) | 79 | 60 | 156 | 0.9495 | − 2.440 | XM_015280418.2 | This study |
R: GCTTCTTCAGCTGCCACATAAC | |||||||||
MLKL | F: ATTTGAAGGCTGCCCTCTCC | 1216/1217 (forward primer) | 121 | 60 | 206 | 0.9524 | − 2.055 | XM_015279230.2 | This study |
R: GAAGGCCCGACACTGATTGA | |||||||||
TBPa | F: CCACGGTGAATCTTGGTTGC | 534/535 (reverse primer) | 88 | 60 | 156 | 0.9423 | − 2.447 | NM_205103.1 | 97 |
R: GCAGCAAAACGCTTGGGATT | |||||||||
YWHAZa | F: TTGCTGCTGGAGATGACAAG | E2/E3 (forward primer) | 61 | 60 | 120 | 0.9656 | − 2.910 | NM_001031343.1 | 98 |
R: CTTCTTGATACGCCTGTTG |
For calculating amplification efficiency, a standard curve was generated using a tenfold dilution of cDNA. The standard curve was created by plotting the Cq values against the log of the starting quantity of template for each dilution.
aUsed as reference genes for relative expression data analysis. Exon junction represent the spanning of exon on genes sequence.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (project numbers: AH/2015/003 and AH/2010/039). The authors appreciate help from Dr Simson Tarigan and Dr. Indrawati Sendow from Indonesian Research Center for Veterinary Sciences (Bbalitvet) for providing the research materials and providing access to BSL-3 labs and also thanks to Caprifarmindo Laboratories (Bandung, Indonesia) for providing the SPF chickens and eggs.
Author contributions
M.R.: Developed the hypothesis and designed the experimental work, isolated RNA, constructed cDNA libraries, processed and analysed RNA-seq data, wrote the paper. W.Y.L.: supervised the project, reviewed and edited the paper. Y.R.: helped with data analysis, reviewed and edited the paper. M.I.C.: collected samples, reviewed and edited the paper. P.T.K.D.: reviewed and edited paper. I.D.: collected samples, reviewed and edited the paper. E.D.G.: advised on statistical analysis, reviewed and edited the paper. F.H.: acquired funding, supervised the project, reviewed and edited the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript for publication.
Data availability
The raw RNA-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI SRA database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA675698.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-96929-w.
References
- 1.Miller PJ, et al. Identification of new sub-genotypes of virulent Newcastle disease virus with potential panzootic features. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015;29:216–229. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alexander DJ, Aldous EW, Fuller CM. The long view: A selective review of 40 years of Newcastle disease research. Avian Pathol. 2012;41:329–335. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2012.697991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller PJ, Decanini EL, Afonso CL. Newcastle disease: Evolution of genotypes and the related diagnostic challenges. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2010;10:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doyle T. A hitherto unrecorded disease of fowls due to a filter-passing virus. J. Comp. Pathol. 1927;40:144–169. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adi AAAM, Astawa NM, Putra KSA, Hayashi Y, Matsumoto Y. Isolation and characterization of a pathogenic Newcastle disease virus from a natural case in Indonesia. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010;72:313–319. doi: 10.1292/jvms.09-0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiao S, et al. Generation by reverse genetics of an effective, stable, live-attenuated Newcastle disease virus vaccine based on a currently circulating, highly virulent Indonesian strain. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dimitrov KM, et al. Updated unified phylogenetic classification system and revised nomenclature for Newcastle disease virus. Infect. Genet. Evolut. 2019;74:103917. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hemmatzadeh F. Molecular Characterisation of Newly Emerged Newcastle Disease Viruses in Indonesia. ACIAR; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rabiei, M. et al. Genome sequences of newly emerged Newcastle disease virus strains isolated from disease outbreaks in Indonesia. Microbiol. Resource Announcements9(23), (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Afonso, C. et al. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. (Edited by OIE. Paris, 2012).
- 11.Doan PTK, et al. Genome sequences of Newcastle disease virus strains from two outbreaks in Indonesia. Microbiol. Resource Announcements. 2020;9:e00205–00220. doi: 10.1128/mra.00205-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pandarangga P, et al. Full-genome sequences of two Newcastle disease virus strains isolated in West Java, Indonesia. Microbiol. Resource Announcements. 2020;9:e00221-00220. doi: 10.1128/mra.00221-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nagai Y. Virus activation by host proteinases. A pivotal role in the spread of infection, tissue tropism and pathogenicity. Microbiol. Immunol. 1995;39:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1995.tb02161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saelao P, et al. Distinct transcriptomic response to Newcastle disease virus infection during heat stress in chicken tracheal epithelial tissue. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86795-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saelao P, et al. Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of differential expression of chicken lung tissue in response to NDV infection during heat stress. Genes. 2018;9:579. doi: 10.3390/genes9120579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saelao P, et al. Novel insights into the host immune response of chicken Harderian gland tissue during Newcastle disease virus infection and heat treatment. BMC Vet. Res. 2018;14:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1583-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deist MS, et al. Resistant and susceptible chicken lines show distinctive responses to Newcastle disease virus infection in the lung transcriptome. BMC Genom. 2017;18:989. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4380-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deist MS, et al. Novel mechanisms revealed in the trachea transcriptome of resistant and susceptible chicken lines following infection with Newcastle disease virus. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2017;24:e00027-00017. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00027-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Deist MS, et al. Novel analysis of the Harderian gland transcriptome response to Newcastle disease virus in two inbred chicken lines. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24830-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang J, et al. Transcriptome analysis in spleen reveals differential regulation of response to Newcastle disease virus in two chicken lines. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19754-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals inhibitory effects of lentogenic Newcastle disease virus on cell survival and immune function in spleen of commercial layer chicks. Genes. 2020;11:1003. doi: 10.3390/genes11091003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu W, et al. Deep sequencing-based transcriptome profiling reveals avian interferon-stimulated genes and provides comprehensive insight into Newcastle disease virus-induced host responses. Viruses. 2018;10:162. doi: 10.3390/v10040162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Galluzzi L, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cuadrado-Castano S, Sanchez-Aparicio MT, García-Sastre A, Villar E. The therapeutic effect of death: Newcastle disease virus and its antitumor potential. Virus Res. 2015;209:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kommers G, King D, Seal B, Carmichael K, Brown C. Pathogenesis of six pigeon-origin isolates of Newcastle disease virus for domestic chickens. Vet. Pathol. 2002;39:353–362. doi: 10.1354/vp.39-3-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kalid M, Jahanshiri F, Rahman A, Yusoff K. Gene expression profiling in apoptotic MCF-7 cells infected with Newcastle disease virus. Glob. Vet. 2010;5:334–340. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ravindra P, et al. HN protein of Newcastle disease virus causes apoptosis in chicken embryo fibroblast cells. Adv. Virol. 2008;153:749–754. doi: 10.1007/s00705-008-0057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robbins S, Cotran R. Cellular adaptations, cell injury and cell death. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, editors. Pathologic Basis of Disease. Saunders-Elsevier; 2009. pp. 26–32. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brown C, King D, Seal B. Pathogenesis of Newcastle disease in chickens experimentally infected with viruses of different virulence. Vet. Pathol. 1999;36:125–132. doi: 10.1354/vp.36-2-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kommers GD, King DJ, Seal BS, Brown CC. Pathogenesis of chicken-passaged Newcastle disease viruses isolated from chickens and wild and exotic birds. Avian Dis. 2003;47:319–329. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0319:POCNDV]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wakamatsu N, King D, Kapczynski D, Seal B, Brown C. Experimental pathogenesis for chickens, turkeys, and pigeons of exotic Newcastle disease virus from an outbreak in California during 2002–2003. Vet. Pathol. 2006;43:925–933. doi: 10.1354/vp.43-6-925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kommers, G. D., King, D. J., Seal, B. S. & Brown, C. C. Virulence of pigeon-origin Newcastle disease virus isolates for domestic chickens. Avian Diseases 906–921 (2001). [PubMed]
- 33.Stolte M, Haas L, Wamwayi H, Barrett T, Wohlsein P. Induction of apoptotic cellular death in lymphatic tissues of cattle experimentally infected with different strains of rinderpest virus. J. Comp. Pathol. 2002;127:14–21. doi: 10.1053/jcpa.2002.0559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vidalain P-O, Azocar O, Rabourdin-Combe C, Servet-Delprat C. Measle virus-infected dendritic cells develop immunosuppressive and cytotoxic activities. Immunobiology. 2001;204:629–638. doi: 10.1078/0171-2985-00102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McCullough B, Krakowka S, Koestner A. Experimental canine distemper virus-induced lymphoid depletion. Am. J. Pathol. 1974;74:155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schobesberger M, Summerfield A, Doherr MG, Zurbriggen A, Griot C. Canine distemper virus-induced depletion of uninfected lymphocytes is associated with apoptosis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2005;104:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rodríguez-Ropón A, et al. Apoptosis in lymph nodes and changes in lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood of pigs infected with porcine rubulavirus. J. Comp. Pathol. 2003;128:1–8. doi: 10.1053/jcpa.2002.0598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parede, L. & Young, P. The pathogenesis of velogenic Newcastle disease virus infection of chickens of different ages and different levels of immunity. Avian Diseases. 803–808 (1990). [PubMed]
- 39.Hamid H, Campbell R, Parede L. Studies of the pathology of velogenic Newcastle disease: Virus infection in non-immune and immune birds. Avian Pathol. 1991;20:561–575. doi: 10.1080/03079459108418796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Panda A, Huang Z, Elankumaran S, Rockemann DD, Samal SK. Role of fusion protein cleavage site in the virulence of Newcastle disease virus. Microb. Pathog. 2004;36:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2003.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Orsi M, et al. Newcastle disease virus vaccine strains: Immunogenicity is not influenced by ICPI. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2009;11:129–133. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Waldron C, Lacroute F. Effect of growth rate on the amounts of ribosomal and transfer ribonucleic acids in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 1975;122:855–865. doi: 10.1128/jb.122.3.855-865.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van Herreweghe F, Festjens N, Declercq W, Vandenabeele P. Tumor necrosis factor-mediated cell death: To break or to burst, that’s the question. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:1567–1579. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0283-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rue CA, et al. Virulent Newcastle disease virus elicits a strong innate immune response in chickens. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92:931–939. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.025486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lan D, Tang C, Li M, Yue H. Screening and identification of differentially expressed genes from chickens infected with Newcastle disease virus by suppression subtractive hybridization. Avian Pathol. 2010;39:151–159. doi: 10.1080/03079451003716383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schilling MA, et al. Transcriptional innate immune response of the developing chicken embryo to Newcastle disease virus infection. Front. Genet. 2018;9:61. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sun Y, et al. Autophagy benefits the replication of Newcastle disease virus in chicken cells and tissues. J. Virol. 2014;88:525–537. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01849-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang S, et al. Activation of the PKR/eIF2α signaling cascade inhibits replication of Newcastle disease virus. Virol. J. 2014;11:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J, Jr, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Alexander DJ, Manvell RJ, Parsons G. Newcastle disease virus (strain Herts 33/56) in tissues and organs of chickens infected experimentally. Avian Pathol. 2006;35:99–101. doi: 10.1080/03079450600597444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Hume DA. Interferon-γ: An overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004;75:163–189. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sachan S, et al. Adjuvant potential of resiquimod with inactivated Newcastle disease vaccine and its mechanism of action in chicken. Vaccine. 2015;33:4526–4532. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Araki K, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ma J, Sun Q, Mi R, Zhang H. Avian influenza A virus H5N1 causes autophagy-mediated cell death through suppression of mTOR signaling. J. Genet. Genom. 2011;38:533–537. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shrivastava S, Chowdhury JB, Steele R, Ray R, Ray RB. Hepatitis C virus upregulates Beclin1 for induction of autophagy and activates mTOR signaling. J. Virol. 2012;86:8705–8712. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00616-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shrestha N, et al. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) signaling regulates proinflammatory cytokine expression and bacterial invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:28738–28744. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.375915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zeilhofer HU, Schorr W. Role of interleukin-8 in neutrophil signaling. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2000;7:178–182. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200005000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Verbist KC, Klonowski KD. Functions of IL-15 in anti-viral immunity: Multiplicity and variety. Cytokine. 2012;59:467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fowell DJ, et al. Impaired NFATc translocation and failure of Th2 development in Itk-deficient CD4+ T cells. Immunity. 1999;11:399–409. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Broussard C, et al. Altered development of CD8+ T cell lineages in mice deficient for the Tec kinases Itk and Rlk. Immunity. 2006;25:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Stepaniak JA, Shuster JE, Hu W, Sundick RS. Production and in vitro characterization of recombinant chicken interleukin-2. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 1999;19:515–526. doi: 10.1089/107999099313965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Staeheli P, Puehler F, Schneider K, Göbel TW, Kaspers B. Cytokines of birds: conserved functions—A largely different look. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2001;21:993–1010. doi: 10.1089/107999001317205123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yu P, et al. Specific T regulatory cells display broad suppressive functions against experimental allergic encephalomyelitis upon activation with cognate antigen. J. Immunol. (Baltimore, Md. 1950) 2005;174:6772–6780. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Descatoire M, et al. Identification of a human splenic marginal zone B cell precursor with NOTCH2-dependent differentiation properties. J. Exp. Med. 2014;211:987–1000. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Deist MS, Gallardo RA, Dekkers J, Zhou H, Lamont SJ. Novel combined tissue transcriptome analysis after lentogenic Newcastle disease virus challenge in inbred chicken lines of differential resistance. Front. Genet. 2020;11:11. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schilling MA, et al. Innate immune genes associated with newcastle disease virus load in chick embryos from inbred and outbred lines. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1432. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gower TL, et al. RhoA signaling is required for respiratory syncytial virus-induced syncytium formation and filamentous virion morphology. J. Virol. 2005;79:5326–5336. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.9.5326-5336.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Marítnez A, et al. TrkB and TrkC signaling are required for maturation and synaptogenesis of hippocampal connections. J. Neurosci. 1998;18:7336–7350. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07336.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Eze CP, et al. Comparative study of the pathology and pathogenesis of a local velogenic Newcastle disease virus infection in ducks and chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2014;13:52. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2014.52.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Igwe, O. A., Ezema, S. W., Eze, C. D. & Okoye, O. Experimental velogenic Newcastle disease can be very severe and viscerotropic in chickens but moderate and neurotropic in guinea fowls: Experimental velogenic Newcastle disease can be very severe and viscerotropic in chickens but moderate and neurotropic in guinea fowls (2014).
- 71.Ezema WS, Eze DC, Shoyinka SVO, Okoye JOA. Atrophy of the lymphoid organs and suppression of antibody response caused by velogenic Newcastle disease virus infection in chickens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2016;48:1703–1709. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1147-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mahgoub HA. An overview of infectious bursal disease. Adv. Virol. 2012;157:2047–2057. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1377-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Silva MSE, Rissi DR, Swayne DE. Very virulent infectious bursal disease virus produces more-severe disease and lesions in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) leghorns than in SPF broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 2016;60:63–66. doi: 10.1637/11230-070615-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang B, Liu X, Chen W, Chen L. IFIT5 potentiates anti-viral response through enhancing innate immune signaling pathways. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2013;45:867–874. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Abbas YM, Pichlmair A, Górna MW, Superti-Furga G, Nagar B. Structural basis for viral 5′-PPP-RNA recognition by human IFIT proteins. Nature. 2013;494:60–64. doi: 10.1038/nature11783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zheng C, et al. IFIT5 positively regulates NF-κB signaling through synergizing the recruitment of IκB kinase (IKK) to TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) Cell. Signal. 2015;27:2343–2354. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rohaim MA, et al. Chickens Expressing IFIT5 ameliorate clinical outcome and pathology of highly pathogenic avian influenza and velogenic newcastle disease viruses. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Suarez, D. L., Miller, P. J., Koch, G., Mundt, E. & Rautenschlein, S. Newcastle disease, other avian paramyxoviruses, and avian metapneumovirus infections: Newcastle disease, other avian paramyxoviruses, and avian metapneumovirus infections. Diseases Poultry. 109–166 (2020).
- 79.Bossé J. Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines. Can. Vet. J. 1998;39:183. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Miller PJ, et al. Effects of Newcastle disease virus vaccine antibodies on the shedding and transmission of challenge viruses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013;41:505–513. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shirima RR, et al. Absolute quantification of cassava brown streak virus mRNA by real-time qPCR. J. Virol. Methods. 2017;245:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Andrews, S. Babraham bioinformatics-FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 06 Dec 2018 (2010).
- 83.Krueger, F. Trim galore. A wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files516, 517 (2015).
- 84.Schubert M, Lindgreen S, Orlando L. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC. Res. Notes. 2016;9:88. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li H, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ritchie ME, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Liu R, et al. Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e97–e97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Dwight Z, Palais R, Wittwer CT. uMELT: Prediction of high-resolution melting curves and dynamic melting profiles of PCR products in a rich web application. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1019–1020. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8:1–14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Pfaffl MW, Hageleit M. Validities of mRNA quantification using recombinant RNA and recombinant DNA external calibration curves in real-time RT-PCR. Biotech. Lett. 2001;23:275–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1005658330108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Laboratories, B.-R. Real-time PCR applications guide (Bio-Rad Laboratories Hercules, CA, 2006), pp 2–6.
- 95.Rasmussen, R. Quantification on the LightCycler. In ‘Rapid Cycle Real-Time PCR Methods and Applications’.(Eds S. Meuer, C. Wittwer and K. Nakagawara K.) pp. 21–34 (Springer Press: Berlin, 2001).
- 96.Khan S, Roberts J, Wu S-B. Reference gene selection for gene expression study in shell gland and spleen of laying hens challenged with infectious bronchitis virus. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Khan, S. & Chousalkar, K. K. Transcriptome profiling analysis of caeca in chicks challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium reveals differential expression of genes involved in host mucosal immune response. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1–16 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 98.Bagés S, Estany J, Tor M, Pena R. Investigating reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis across four chicken tissues. Gene. 2015;561:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw RNA-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI SRA database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA675698.