Skip to main content
American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging logoLink to American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):290–299.

HPLC-free and cassette-based nucleophilic production of [18F]FDOPA for clinical use

Huailei Jiang 1,2, Manoj K Jain 1, Hancheng Cai 1
PMCID: PMC8414396  PMID: 34513282

Abstract

Radiotracer 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine (L-6-[18F]fluorodopa or [18F]FDOPA) is widely used for PET imaging of dopamine metabolism in several diseases including Parkinson’s Disease, brain tumor, neuroendocrine tumors, and focal hyperinsulinism of infancy. In 2019, [18F]FDOPA was approved by US FDA for detection of dopaminergic nerve terminals in the striatum of adult patients with suspected Parkinsonian Syndromes. A convenient and reliable method is desired for fully automated production of [18F]FDOPA under cGMP compliance to meet the increasing clinical need. In this study, we reported a cassette-based automated production of [18F]FDOPA using a GE Fastlab 2 module and the quality control (QC) under fully cGMP compliant environment. Briefly, automated radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA was processed via nucleophilic radio-fluorination using FDOPA Fastlab cassette and solid phase extraction (SPE) purification. The QC tests of [18F]FDOPA, including appearance, pH, half-life, radiochemical purity and identity, enantiomeric purity, chemical impurities, molecular activity, radioactive concentration, filter integrity, endotoxin, and sterility, were conducted at the end of synthesis (EOS) and 8 h after EOS during the validation runs. Three consecutive productions of [18F]FDOPA were reliably achieved with desired radiochemical yield and high radiochemical/enantiomeric purities and molar activity. The uncorrected radiochemical yields of [18F]FDOPA were 9.3-9.8% with a total synthesis time of ~140 min. Both radiochemical and enantiomeric purities of [18F]FDOPA were >99.9% and the molar activities were 2.1-3.9 Ci/μmole at EOS. The full QC results at EOS and 8 h after EOS showed that the produced [18F]FDOPA met all release criteria for clinical use within 8 hours of expiration time. Three consecutive validation runs and QC results demonstrated the efficacy of cassette-based production of [18F]FDOPA for routine clinical use.

Keywords: [18F]FDOPA, radiosynthesis, quality control, PET imaging

Introduction

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a clinical and research molecular imaging technology using positron-emitter labeled bioactive molecules (called radiotracer or radiopharmaceutical) to noninvasively quantify in vivo biological process [1]. As an analogue of 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA), 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa ([18F]FDOPA) is a well-established F-18 labelled radiopharmaceutical with an ideal half-life of 109.8 min for PET imaging of dopamine metabolism and L-type amino acid transporter in several diseases including Parkinson’s Disease (PD), brain tumor, neuroendocrine tumors, and focal hyperinsulinism of infancy [2-9]. Indeed, [18F]FDOPA was originally developed in early 1980s for PET imaging of dopaminergic system in human brain including PD and related disorders [9,10]. Years later, [18F]FDOPA was successfully explored for PET imaging of brain tumors and a variety of neuroendocrine tumors, as well as congenital hyperinsulinemia of infants [11-13]. In 2019, given its high specificity and sensitivity for PD diagnosis, [18F]FDOPA was approved as a radioactive PET diagnostic agent by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) for visualizing dopaminergic nerve terminals in the striatum of adult patients with suspected Parkinsonian syndromes [14]. In addition, [18F]FDOPA PET has been used as a biomarker to measure the integrity and function of dopaminergic nerve terminals for patient stratification and therapy response. With the advent of regenerative medicine for PD therapy [15], [18F]FDOPA PET has the potential to serve as an imaging biomarker for monitoring regenerative therapy of PD, as the mechanism lies in regeneration of dopaminergic pre-synaptic function to take up DOPA and synthesize dopamine in brain [16]. Similarly, [18F]FDOPA PET has been used in monitoring the therapy to distinguish patient’s response to the treatment of psychosis [17].

Despite of the advance in diverse PET imaging applications, the utilization of [18F]FDOPA is stagnant partially due to its complicated radiosynthesis. The main challenge is that synthesis of [18F]FDOPA requires radiofluorination on highly electron-rich catechol scaffold. To solve this issue, [18F]FDOPA was initially synthesized using [18F]F2 or [18F]acetyl hypofluorite desilylation, demercuration or destannylation via electrophilic aromatic substitution [18-21]. And later, more selectively electrophilic fluorodestannylation reaction was commonly applied in clinical research [22-25]. However, such electrophilic radiofluorination requires highly reactive and corrosive electrophilic fluorinating agents and specialized fluorine gas targetry and equipment. Additionally, electrophilic radiofluorination has poor selectivity, and non-radioactive fluorine gas (F2) is usually used as a carrier gas to flush [18F]F2 off target body, resulting in low molar activity [18F]FDOPA [26,27]. Given that radioactive fluoride ([18F]F-) is readily available in most medical cyclotrons, nucleophilic radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA using [18F]F- is desired to reach large amount of radioactivity with high molar activity. To use [18F]F- as the nucleophile, the conventional nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr) synthesis of [18F]FDOPA requires the existence of strong electron-withdrawing groups in the ortho- or para-positions of the aromatic structure and an appropriate leaving group [28-31]. Two more efficient approaches for nucleophilic radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA were recently reported to use Boron-Pin or stannyl precursor and copper-catalyzed coupling reaction [32-35]. Details in most recent advance [18F]FDOPA synthesis are well documented in systematic reviews [27,28,36]. Nevertheless, to overcome the conflict of nucleophilic radiofluorination on electron-rich catechol ring, benzaldehyde precursor with an appropriate leaving group is typically used as the starting step, followed by oxidation of the F-18 labelled aldehyde intermediate and hydrolysis of the resulting ester. Therefore, nucleophilic radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA usually requires three steps with either preinstalled or following coupling of the amino acid side chain.

To further advance the utilization of [18F]FDOPA, a GE Fastlab cassette-based production with incorporation of additional HPLC purification was developed using the well-established three-step nucleophilic method [30]. ABX also developed the cassette-based production of [18F]FDOPA with solid phase extraction (SPE) purification on GE Tracerlab MX, ORA Neptis, Siemens Explora One modules [37], and GE Fastlab module. However, this is no full-text report available for HPLC-free and cassette-based [18F]FDOPA nucleophilic synthesis on GE Fastlab module. To meet the clinical need of [18F]FDOPA PET imaging in our institute, we chose this cassette-based method for the production of [18F]FDOPA using a GE Fastlab 2 module and ABX cassette owing to the wide access to Flastlab module platform. The method has the advantages of convenient cassette set-up, easy switch between different PET tracer production, availability of validated automation sequence, and data integrity and other regulatory compliance. Here we reported this HPLC-free and cassette-based [18F]FDOPA production on GE Fastlab module and quality control tests under fully cGMP compliant environment.

Material and method

Materials and equipment

[18F]FDOPA Fastlab cassette and all related materials, L-6-FDOPA and D/L-6-FDOPA were purchased from ABX advanced biochemical compounds (Radeberg, Germany). The cassette supplies included vials containing tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate (TBA-HCO3) solution, 30% acetonitrile solution, disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate dihydrate (Na-EDTA) buffer solution, (S)-3-(5-formyl-4-methoxymethoxy-2-nitro-phenyl)-2-(trityl-amino)-propionic acid tert-butyl ester (precursor of [18F]FDOPA), L-ascorbic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), acetonitrile, meta-Chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA), ethanol, 30% hydrochloric acid, water for injection, and Light QMA/C18ec/C18/HR-P/WAX/Alumina Light N cartridges. Acetic acid, ethanol, and L-DOPA were purchased from Millipore Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Tetrabutylammonium (TBA) hydroxide, methanol, and acetonitrile were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).

Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA ) equipped with ultra violet (UV) and radioactivity detectors (Eckert & Ziegler, Wilmington, MA, USA) was used to determine radiochemical purity and identity, molar activity and chemical impurities on an analytical reverse-phase column (Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 100 Å, 5 µm, 4.6×250 mm) at the UV wavelength of 282 nm. The injected sample volume was 20 µL and the mobile phase was a mixture of 1% acetonitrile in 0.1% acetic acid aqueous solution (v/v=1/100) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The same Ultimate 3000 HPLC was applied for radiochemical enantiomeric purity using a chiral column (Chirobotic T 5 um, chiral chromatography column 4.6 mm×250 mm, Millipore Sigma) and 75% ethanol in water as the eluent with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Radio-Thin Layer Chromatography (Radio-TLC) system (Bioscan 2000) with silica gel strip (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and mobile phase of acetic acid/methanol (v/v=1:9) was used to detect radiochemical purity of L-[18F]FDOPA. Tracer 1310 gas chromatography (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a TG-WAXMS column (30 m×0.53 mm×0.50 µm) was used to analyze residual solvents with an injection volume of 0.5 µL sample. Radioactivity was determined with a Capintec® CRC 55tPET dose calibrator (Capintec, Inc., Florham Park, NJ, USA).

Fastlab cassette setup and radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA

Using a disposable ABX cassette, the synthesis of [18F]FDOPA was completed on a GE FASTlab 2 synthesizer, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Briefly, [18F]fluoride anion produced by GE PETtracer 800 cyclotron was trapped on an anion exchange cartridge (QMA), eluted with TBA-HCO3 solution, and azeotropically dried. By radiofluorination of the precursor at 130°C for 8 minutes, intermediate 1 was formed and trapped on a C18 ec cartridge, and then eluted back into reaction vial for further reaction. Followed by mCPBA oxidation and HCl hydrolysis, the crude product was purified with C18 Sep-Pak and HR-P cartridges, rinsed with water, and eluted with a Na-EDTA/L-ascorbic acid buffer solution via WAX and Light Alumina N cartridges. The final formulated [18F]FDOPA product was delivered into a 30 mL product vial passing through a 0.22 µm sterile filter in an ISO 5 dispensing hot cell.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Reaction scheme for preparation of [18F]FDOPA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Diagram of Fastlab cassette for [18F]FDOPA production. A: O-18 water recovery vial; B: 1.05 ml 0.075 M TBA-HCO3 solution; D: Light QMA cartridge; I: 100 mL 30% Acetonitrile solution; J: 60 mL Buffer solution; L: 30 mg precursor dissolved in 1.3 mL DMSO; M: 3 mL acetonitrile; N: 18 mg mCPBA in 2.3 mL acetonitrile; O: 1.3 mL ethanol; P: 2.1 mL 30% hydrochloric acid; R: C18ec cartridge; S: C18 cartridge and HR-P cartridge; T: WAX/Alumina Light N cartridge (not shown in this figure) and product vial; W: 100 mL water for injection.

Quality control (QC)

General quality control of [18F]FDOPA was performed according to USP 823, including appearance, pH, radionuclidic identity and purity, radiochemical identity and purity, enantiomeric purity, chemical purity, TBA residual, solvent residual, bacteria endotoxin, sterility, and stability. The detailed procedure of these QC tests was presented in Supplementary Information.

Results

Radiosynthesis

The radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA, which included [18F]fluoride receiving/activation, nucleophilic radiofluorination, oxidation, acid deprotection, multiple SPE purifications, final product delivery and sterile filtration, was automatically processed by FASTlab module. Three consecutive batches of [18F]FDOPA production were successfully completed within defined specifications, and the summary was presented in Table 1. Specifically, with a total synthesis time of ~140 min, [18F]FDOPA was obtained in the activities of 354-400 mCi at the end of synthesis (EOS) from starting activities of 3625-4303 mCi. The non-decay corrected radiochemical yields were 9.3-9.8% (n=3). The final products were formulated in buffer with total volumes of 27.2-27.3 mL.

Table 1.

Summary for [18F]FDOPA production

[18F]FDOPA Batch ID Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Starting [18F]fluoride Activity 4007 mCi 3625 mCi 4303 mCi
[18F]FDOPA Activity at EOS 389 mCi 354 mCi 400 mCi
[18F]FDOPA Product Volume 27.2 mL 27.3 mL 27.3 mL
Radiochemical Yield (%) (Non-decay corrected) 9.7% 9.8% 9.3%

Quality control

The QC results showed that the produced [18F]FDOPA met all the release criteria for clinical use. As indicated in Table 2, all three batch products were clear, colorless solutions, and free from particulate matter. The pH and half-life value were within the ranges of 4.0-6.0 and 105-115 min. From analytical HPLC and Radio-TLC results, the radiochemical purities (Figures 3 and S1) and enantiomeric purities (Figure 4) were >99%, and the radiochemical identities were within 10% deviation from the retention time of [18F]FDOPA and reference standard. The contents of non-radiochemical FDOPA were 1-2 µg/mL and the total impurities were 37-45 µg in [18F]FDOPA products. The molar activities were 2.1-3.9 Ci/µmol at EOS. The radionuclidic purities were >99.5%, determined by half-life test and no-observance of long-lived isotopes existence in the product after five days decay. The residual TBA concentrations were ≤100 µg/mL. The residual solvents in product were determined to be 2.55-3.68% ethanol, 0.01-0.03% acetonitrile and negligible amount of DMSO on GC. The integrity of the sterile filter was demonstrated by a bubble-point filter test with holding ≥50 psi pressure. The formulated products were sterile and nonpyrogenic from the sterility and endotoxin results. Stability was evaluated by performing a full quality control at EOS and followed by second assessment at the proposed expiration time of 8 hours after EOS. The [18F]FDOPA vial was stored in an inverted position at room temperature during the expiration period. No leaks, sorption or degradation of the container closure were observed. A summary of the stability testing results at 8 h after EOS were given in Table S1. No significant changes were noted in appearance, pH, radiochemical/chemical purity, and endotoxin after 8 hours of room temperature storage. Based on these results, the expiration of [18F]FDOPA was set at 8-hour post EOS.

Table 2.

Summary of quality control testing results for [18F]FDOPA validation runs

Test Acceptance Criteria Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Appearance Colorless and free from particulate matter Pass Pass Pass
Radionuclidic Identity Half-life is 110±5 minutes 109 min 109 min 110 min
Radiochemical Identity Rt [18F]FDOPA ±10% 2% 1% 1%
Rt of pure L-6-FDOPA std
Radiochemical Purity Activity of [18F]FDOPA ≥95.0% of total radioactivity 100% 100% 100%
Radionuclidic Purity ≥99.5% of the observed peaks should correspond to the 0.511 MeV, 1.022 MeV, or Compton scatter peaks of [18F] Pass Pass Pass
Enantiomeric Ratio L-isomer of [18F]FDOPA >95% of total radioactivity measured 100% 100% 100%
pH 4.0-6.0 4.4 4.4 4.4
Chemical Purity Residual Solvents
Ethanol ≤10.00% (w/v) 3.68% 2.66% 2.55%
MeCN ≤0.04% (w/v) 0.03% 0.01% 0.02%
DMSO ≤0.50% (w/v) 0.01% 0.00% 0.01%
TBA Size/intensity spot test ≤100 µg/mL Pass Pass Pass
FDOPA ≤20 µg/mL 2 µg/mL 1 µg/mL 1 µg/mL
Total impurities ≤100 µg/mL 37 µg/mL 45 µg/mL 44 µg/mL
Specific Activity ≥1 Ci/µmol @ EOS 2.1 Ci/µmol 3.2 Ci/µmol 3.9 Ci/µmol
Radioactive Concentration 0.2 to 17.9 mCi/mL @ EOS 14.3 mCi/mL 12.97 mCi/mL 14.65 mCi/mL
Filter Integrity ≥50 psi Pass Pass Pass
Endotoxin ≤175 EU/V* Pass Pass Pass
Sterility Sterile (No visible growth) Pass Pass Pass
*

V means the total volume of final product.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative analytical HPLC chromatograms of [18F]FDOPA and its reference standard. (A) HPLC chromatogram for FDOPA reference standard (20 µg/mL); (B and C) HPLC chromatograms for [18F]FDOPA, (B) UV signal; (C) Radioactivity signal.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Representative chiral analytical HPLC chromatograms of [18F]FDOPA and D/L-6-FDOPA. A: Chiral HPLC chromatogram for D/L-6-FDOPA (20 µg/mL); B: Chiral HPLC chromatogram for L-6-FDOPA (20 µg/mL); C: Chiral HPLC chromatogram for [18F]FDOPA.

Discussion

[18F]FDOPA is a radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of several diseases, including PD, brain tumor, neuroendocrine tumors, and focal hyperinsulinism of infancy. The complicated radiosynthesis has limited its availability for clinical use. It is efficient and convenient to produce [18F]FDOPA by nucleophilic radiosynthesis using commercially available ABX cassette, especially for facilities already equipped with medical cyclotron and Fastlab module for onsite FDG production, which significantly reduced the effort for method development of [18F]FDOPA radiosynthesis. Additionally, this cassette-based [18F]FDOPA production uses SPE purifications, avoiding time-consuming semi-preparative HPLC separation. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that [18F]FDOPA could be achieved with excellent radiochemical/enantiomeric purity and molar activity using this HPLC-free and cassette-based production. In addition to reliable radiochemistry, this method has advantages in module maintenance and fast switch between different cassette-based PET tracer production, which does not require clean procedures with disposable cassettes. Finally, the Fastlab cassette production method enhances data integrity for documentation and FDA CGMP regulatory compliance.

During the method development, FDOPA reference standard and analogs solutions were found stable in the solution of 1% acetic acid for up to six months in refrigerator. As a comparison, the solution of FDOPA in acetonitrile/DMSO/water without acetic acid developed a yellow color in a few days and turned to dark solutions gradually. The improved stability may be obtained from acidification of the catechol and amino acid by acetic acid. Therefore, acetic acid solution was also used in HPLC and radio-TLC analysis [38]. More importantly, the formulation of final product in pH 4-5 is critical to maintain its stability within 8 hours expiration time. In this method, L-ascorbic acid was added in the buffer to stabilize the final product solution, which was shown on HPLC chromatogram of [18F]FDOPA (Figure 3B).

Without use of HPLC purification, minor chemical impurities within acceptance range were found in the final product. Analytical HPLC condition was optimized to quantitate these chemical impurities (Figure 3). With 1% acetonitrile in 0.1% acetic acid, the improved analytical HPLC separation was obtained on a reverse-phase Phenomenex Luna C18(2) column. All impurity peaks were integrated and calculated for their quantification. As a stabilizer, L-ascorbic acid was shown as a major peak in the HPLC UV chromatography. Additionally, the quantifiable impurity peak at 2.553 min was likely 6-OH-DOPA, a nucleophilic substitution byproduct. The concentration of nonradioactive FDOPA in the final [18F]FDOPA product was 1-2 µg/mL, and the total mass of impurities (L-ascorbic acid excluded) were 37-45 µg in [18F]FDOPA products, which were under the allowed limits based on European pharmacopeia 9.7-Fluorodopa (18F) Injection [39]. To measure the enantiomeric purity of [18F]FDOPA, chiral chromatography column was used with 75% ethanol in water solution as the eluent. As shown in Figure 4, excellent resolutions were obtained between L-6-FDOPA and D-6-FDOPA, with retention times of 5.933 min and 10.297 min, respectively.

There are a few noticeable limitations to be addressed in further method development of Fastlab-cassette based [18F]FDOPA production. Firstly, although [18F]FDOPA was obtained successfully in our laboratory, residual solvent acetonitrile contents in final product were variable from 0.01 to 0.03%, shown in Table 2. It may reach to 0.04% in rare case for large scale routine production, resulting in out of specification for acetonitrile residual. Therefore, further optimization in the purification steps may be required to reduce acetonitrile residual, e.g. extra flush or more water rinse at the cartridge purification steps. Secondly, during the product delivery, unexpected leakage was observed at the joint of alumina N and WAX cartridges due to the back pressure built from the long-distance transferring tubing between synthesizer and final product vial. A home-designed and 3-D printed cartridge holder was used to lock alumina N and WAX cartridges to avoid potential leakage, which is strongly suggested for more than 30 feet tubing delivery. Thirdly, unlike FDG, current clinical usage of [18F]FDOPA are limited to the small number of patients in a few academic medical centers, the cost for each batch production using FDOPA Fastlab cassette is more expensive in comparison to conventional research production method. Finally, with continuous improvements and progress in nucleophilic radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA, more simple and convenient methods are reported, such as one-pot two-step radiosynthesis of high-molar-activity [18F]FDOPA by Cu-mediated fluorination of a pinacol boronate (BPin) [32,33], or by direct arene radiofluorination via photoredox-mediated halide catalysis [40,41]. These most recent advance may be applicable to next generation cassette-based radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA. Nevertheless, current cassette-based nucleophilic radiosynthesis of [18F]FDOPA allows for obtaining hundreds of millicuries product with high radiochemical purity and molar activity for clinical use.

Conclusion

Using nucleophilic radiofluorination and SPE purification, HPLC-free and cassette-based production of [18F]FDOPA on GE Fastlab module was efficiently and reproducibly achieved in large-scale production with desired radiochemical yield. The produced [18F]FDOPA has excellent radiochemical/enantiomeric purities, molar activity, and stability, and met all release specifications for clinical use.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Florida. We thank Jeffrey T. Snyder and Jeremiah E. Alicea in our department for cyclotron operation and maintenance, as well as Fang Ping and Mark Jacobson from Mayo Clinic in Rochester Campus for their technique support for [18F]FDOPA production and quality control process.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Supporting Information

ajnmmi0011-0290-f5.pdf (249.8KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Phelps ME. Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9226–9233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turjanski N, Lees AJ, Brooks DJ. Dopaminergic function in patients with posttraumatic parkinsonism: an [18F]DOPA PET study. Neurology. 1997;49:183–189. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Cloughesy T, Silverman DH, Geist CL, Walter MA, Schiepers C, Nghiemphu P, Lai A, Phelps ME, Chen W. Correlation of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa PET uptake with proliferation and tumor grade in newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1532–1538. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Imperiale A, Rust E, Gabriel S, Detour J, Goichot B, Duclos B, Kurtz JE, Bachellier P, Namer IJ, Taïeb D. [18F]Fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin: relation to tumor origin and differentiation. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:367–372. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.126896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kauhanen S, Seppänen M, Minn H, Gullichsen R, Salonen A, Alanen K, Parkkola R, Solin O, Bergman J, Sane T, Salmi J, Välimäki M, Nuutila P. Fluorine-18-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA) positron emission tomography as a tool to localize an insulinoma or beta-cell hyperplasia in adult patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1237–1244. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Otonkoski T, Näntö-Salonen K, Seppänen M, Veijola R, Huopio H, Hussain K, Tapanainen P, Eskola O, Parkkola R, Ekström K, Guiot Y, Rahier J, Laakso M, Rintala R, Nuutila P, Minn H. Noninvasive diagnosis of focal hyperinsulinism of infancy with [18F]-FDOPA positron emission tomography. Diabetes. 2006;55:13–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arena JE, Urrutia L, Falasco G, de Leon MP, Vazquez S. Quantification methods comparison in brain [18F]FDOPA PET. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;9:274–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Masselli G, De Angelis C, Sollaku S, Casciani E, Gualdi G. PET/CT in pediatric oncology. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;10:83–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ibrahim N, Kusmirek J, Struck AF, Floberg JM, Perlman SB, Gallagher C, Hall LT. The sensitivity and specificity of F-FDOPA PET in a movement disorder clinic. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;6:102–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garnett ES, Firnau G, Nahmias C. Nahmias, Dopamine visualized in the basal ganglia of living man. Nature. 1983;305:137–138. doi: 10.1038/305137a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Becherer A, Szabó M, Karanikas G, Wunderbaldinger P, Angelberger P, Raderer M, Kurtaran A, Dudczak R, Kletter K. Imaging of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with [18F]FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1161–1167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Humbert O, Bourg V, Mondot L, Gal J, Bondiau PY, Fontaine D, Saada-Bouzid E, Paquet M, Chardin D, Almairac F, Vandenbos F, Darcourt J. 18F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:558–568. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4240-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.States LJ, Saade-Lemus S, De Leon DD. 18F-L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine PET/computed tomography in the management of congenital hyperinsulinism. PET Clin. 2020;15:349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dhawan V, Niethammer M, Lesser M, Pappas K, Hellman MJ, Fitzpatrick T, Quartarolo L, Bjelke D, Eidelberg D, Chlay T. Prospective FDOPA PET imaging study in human PD: our final step towards NDA approval. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:S1565. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parmar M, Grealish S, Henchcliffe C. Henchcliffe, the future of stem cell therapies for Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21:103–115. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0257-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Akamatsu G, Ohnishi A, Aita K, Nishida H, Ikari Y, Sasaki M, Kohara N, Senda M. A revisit to quantitative PET with 18F-FDOPA of high specific activity using a high-resolution condition in view of application to regenerative therapy. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:163–171. doi: 10.1007/s12149-016-1143-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Veronese M, Santangelo B, Jauhar S, D’Ambrosio E, Demjaha A, Salimbeni H, Huajie J, McCrone P, Turkheimer F, Howes O. A potential biomarker for treatment stratification in psychosis: evaluation of an [18F]FDOPA PET imaging approach. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46:1122–1132. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00866-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Diksic M, Farrokhzad S. New synthesis of fluorine-labeled 6-fluoro-L-dopa by cleaving the carbon-silicon bond with fluorine. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:1314–1318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Namavari M, Satyamurthy N, Phelps ME, Barrio JR. Synthesis of 6-[18F] and 4-[18F]fluoro-L-m-tyrosines via regioselective radiofluorodestannylation. Appl Radiat Isot. 1993;44:527–536. doi: 10.1016/0969-8043(93)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Füchtner F, Zessin J, Mäding P, Wüst F. Aspects of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA preparation. Deuterochloroform as a substitute solvent for Freon 11. Nuklearmedizin. 2008;47:62–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kawai K, Channing MA, Kiesewetter DO, Eckelman WC. Synthesis of polymer-bound 6-thiolatomercury and 6-mercuric sulfonate DOPA precursors and their halodemercuration reactivity. Nucl Med Biol. 1995;22:37–43. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(94)00079-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Firnau G, Chirakal R, Garnett ES. Aromatic radiofluorination with [18F]fluorine gas: 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:1228–1233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Namavari M, Bishop A, Satyamurthy N, Bida G, Barrio JR. Regioselective radiofluorodestannylation with [18F]F2 and [18F]CH3COOF: a high yield synthesis of 6-[18F]Fluoro-L-dopa. Int J Rad Appl Instrum A. 1992;43:989–996. doi: 10.1016/0883-2889(92)90217-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luurtsema G, Boersma HH, Schepers M, de Vries AMT, Maas B, Zijlma R, de Vries EFJ, Elsinga PH. Improved GMP-compliant multi-dose production and quality control of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s41181-016-0009-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dolle F, Demphel S, Hinnen F, Fournier D, Vaufrey F, Crouzel C. 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA by radiofluorodestannylation: a short and simple synthesis of a new labelling precursor. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 1998;41:105–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wagner FM, Ermert J, Coenen HH. Three-step, “one-pot” radiosynthesis of 6-Fluoro-3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine by isotopic exchange. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1724–1729. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krasikova RN. Nucleophilic synthesis of 6-L-[18F]FDOPA. Is copper-mediated radiofluorination the answer? Molecules. 2020;25:4365. doi: 10.3390/molecules25194365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Edwards R, Wirth T. Wirth, 6-[18F]Fluoro-3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine-recent modern syntheses for an elusive radiotracer. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2015;58:183–187. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pretze M, Franck D, Kunkel F, Foßhag E, Wängler C, Wängler B. Evaluation of two nucleophilic syntheses routes for the automated synthesis of 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA. Nucl Med Biol. 2017;45:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lemaire C, Libert L, Franci X, Genon JL, Kuci S, Giacomelli F, Luxen A. Automated production at the curie level of no-carrier-added L-6-[18F]fluoro-dopa and L-2-[18F]fluoro-tyrosine on a FASTlab synthesizer. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2015;58:281–290. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Libert LC, Franci X, Plenevaux AR, Ooi T, Maruoka K, Luxen AJ, Lemaire CF. Production at the curie level of no-carrier-added 6-18F-fluoro-L-dopa. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1154–1161. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mossine AV, Tanzey SS, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Ichiishi N, Miller JM, Henderson BD, Skaddan MB, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. One-pot synthesis of high molar activity 6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA by Cu-mediated fluorination of a BPin precursor. Org Biomol Chem. 2019;17:8701–8705. doi: 10.1039/c9ob01758e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mossine AV, Tanzey SS, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Ichiishi N, Miller JM, Henderson BD, Erhard T, Bruetting C, Skaddan MB, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Synthesis of high-molar-activity L-6-[18F]fluoro-DOPA suitable for human use via Cu-mediated fluorination of a BPin precursor. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:1742–1759. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0305-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Makaravage KJ, Brooks AF, Mossine AV, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Copper-mediated radiofluorination of arylstannanes with [18F]KF. Org Lett. 2016;18:5440–5443. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zarrad F, Zlatopolskiy BD, Krapf P, Zischler J, Neumaier B. A practical method for the preparation of F-18 labeled aromatic amino acids from nucleophilic [18F]fluoride and stannyl precursors for electrophilic radiohalogenation. Molecules. 2017;22:2231. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neves ÂCB, Hrynchak I, Fonseca I, Alves VHP, Pereira MM, Falcão A, Abrunhosa AJ. Advances in the automated synthesis of L-6-[18F]Fluoro-DOPA. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2021;6:11. doi: 10.1186/s41181-021-00126-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rene-Martin BD, Huebner S, Juettler S, Saul S, Clausnitzer A, Mollitor J, Smits R, Hoepping A, Mueller M. First SPE method for routine production of nucleophilic L-[18F]FDOPA. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2013;56:S126. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zanzi I, Studentsova Y, Bjelke D, Warner R, Babchyck B, Chaly T. [18F]fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron-emission tomography scans of neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids and pheochromocytomas) J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017;7:20. doi: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_107_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.[18F]Fluorodopa (prepared by nucleophilic substitution) injection. European Pharmacopoeia. 2019:6534–6537. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen W, Huang Z, Tay NES, Giglio B, Wang M, Wang H, Wu Z, Nicewicz DA, Li Z. Direct arene C-H fluorination with [18F]F- via organic photoredox catalysis. Science. 2019;364:1170–1174. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen W, Wang H, Nicholas T, Vincent P, Kang-Po L, Tao Z, Zhanhong W, David N, Zibo L. Arene radiouorination enabled by photoredox-mediated halide interconversion. Research Square. 2020 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ajnmmi0011-0290-f5.pdf (249.8KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES