Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2021 Oct 1;35(12):1907–1917. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002974

The entry inhibitor DS003 (BMS-599793), a BMS-806 analogue, provides superior activity as a pre-exposure prophylaxis candidate.

Carolina HERRERA 1,#, Sarah HARMAN 2,#, Yoann ALDON 3, Paul ROGERS 1, Naomi ARMANASCO 1, Paul ZIPRIN 4, Daniel STIEH 5, Jeremy NUTTALL 6, Robin J SHATTOCK 1,+
PMCID: PMC8416713  NIHMSID: NIHMS1711950  PMID: 34101626

Abstract

Objective:

Small molecule inhibitors able to bind to gp120 and prevent CD4-induced HIV-1 envelope conformational change provide an important class of inhibitors. Currently, only Fostemsavir is approved for HAART, which makes this class of inhibitors attractive candidates for prevention. We assessed the activity of DS003 (BMS-599793), an analogue of BMS-378806, in different mucosal tissues and elucidated its mechanism of action.

Design:

Pre-clinical analysis was performed with human mucosal tissue models as surrogates of in vivo activity.

Methods:

Antiviral efficacy of DS003 was assessed in mucosal tissue explants (ecto-cervical, penile and colorectal) and in trans-infection models (co-cultures of dendritic or mucosal migratory cells with CD4+T cells) with several dosing times (2 h, 24 h and sustained) and in combination with a fusion inhibitor. Binding of DS003 to gp120 was assessed by flow cytometry and bio-layer interferometry and further probed in competitive studies using soluble CD4 (sCD4) and an anti-CD4 induced antibody, 17b.

Results:

In all models, the inhibitory activity of DS003 was increased with longer periods of exposure and by combination with a fusion inhibitor. Pre-exposure to sCD4 impeded DS003 binding to viral envelope (Env). In contrast, DS003 did not impact subsequent binding of sCD4. Furthermore, sCD4-induced epitope exposure as assessed by 17b binding was significantly reduced in the presence of DS003.

Conclusion:

DS003 inhibits HIV-1 infection by binding to or near the CD4 binding site of gp120, preventing CD4-induced conformational change essential for viral fusion. These data highlight the potential of DS003 for development as a pre-exposure prophylaxis candidate.

Keywords: prevention, antiretroviral, entry, mucosal, explant, HIV-1

INTRODUCTION

A major target for potential HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) intervention is the binding of viral gp120 to CD4. Inhibiting this step can be achieved by blocking the CD4-binding site within gp120. Small proteins mimicking CD4 have shown high potency against HIV-1 in vitro[1] and in animal studies[2]. An alternative to inhibit effective gp120-CD4 binding is for a drug to bind to gp120 and block the conformational change in gp120 induced by CD4[35]. The only drug with this mechanism of action currently approved for treatment is Fortemsavir and therefore this class of drugs provide an excellent option for prevention strategies to avoid transmission of resistant isolates. This type of inhibitors comprise a group of related small-molecules including BMS-378806, BMS-488043, BMS-626529, and BMS-663068. All of these compounds have been shown to be active against HIV-1 in vitro[3, 4, 6, 7], in vivo[8, 9], and BMS-378806 was shown to protect against vaginal challenge in non-human primates (NHPs)[10]. DS003 (BMS-599793) is another related compound with a similar mechanism of action, developed for topical PrEP as a microbicide candidate by the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM). DS003 has been advanced to a Phase I clinical trial, IPM042, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02877979) as a vaginal tablet showing a good safety profile and achieving concentrations in the female genital tract that were capable of inhibiting ex vivo HIV-1 infection of cervical biopsies [11, 12]. However, no data are available on the inhibitory activity of DS003 in relevant cellular subsets or other mucosal portals of entry, including male genital tract and colorectum, and there is limited knowledge of its binding epitope to Env.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell and virus culture conditions

All cell cultures were maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. TZM-bl cells[1315] and HEK293T/17 cells (ATCC, UK) were grown in Dulbecco’s Minimal Essential Medium (DMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2mM L-glutamine and antibiotics (100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml). PM-1 cells[16] (AIDS reagent project, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, UK) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine and antibiotics (100 U of penicillin/ml and 100 μg of streptomycin/ml). PBMCs were isolated from multi-donor buffy coats from healthy HIV-seronegative donors, by centrifugation onto Ficoll-Hypaque, mitogen stimulated as described previously[17], and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, antibiotics (100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin /ml), and 100 U of interleukin-2/ml. Immature dendritic cells (iDCs) were grown from PBMC-derived monocytes cultured for 6 days in complete RPMI medium supplemented with 1000 U/ml GM-CSF and 500 U/ml IL-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Monocytes were isolated from PBMCs by autoMACS human CD14 Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, UK) following manufacturer’s instructions. iDCs were phenotypically characterized by staining with anti-CD40, anti-CD80, anti-CD86, anti-CD83, anti-CD209, anti-CD123, and anti-CD11c (BD Pharmingen, UK). FACS analysis was performed with a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometry system using BD FACSDiva analysis software.

The laboratory-adapted isolate HIV-1BaL was passaged through activated PBMCs for 11 days.

Reagents and plasmids

BMS-599793 (also known as DS003), BMS-378806 and L’644 (also known as C34-Chol or DS007) were provided by the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM) (Silver Spring, MD). Stocks of DS003 were prepared in DMSO at 10 mM and serial dilutions in culture media where prepared at the required concentrations with good solubility. No precipitates were observed in the culture media during the assays.

HIV-1BaL[18] was obtained from the NIH AIDS Research & Reference Reagent Program (http://www.aidsreagent.org/). Transmitted founder clade B isolates, B17, B8, B14 and B3 were kindly provided by Prof. Eric Arts (Western University, Canada)[19].

HIV-1BaL gp160 Env gene was cloned into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen).

HIV-1 CN54 gp140, kindly provided by Polymun (Austria), was produced in CHO cells as an oligomer shown to be essentially trimeric with a projected mass of 420kDa as described previously[20, 21]. Antigenicity of this protein has been shown in several clinical trials[2224].

Plasmids encoding for the genes of the heavy chain and light chain of the 17b human monoclonal antibody (mAb) were a gift from Dr James Robinson. 17b was produced in HEK293T/17 cells by transient co-transfection with polyethyleneimine (PEI) MAX 40,000 (Polysciences) of the heavy chain and light chain expression plasmids. Forty-eight hours following transfection, secreted mAb was purified using a HiTrap protein G HP column (GE Healthcare) following manufacturer’s instructions.

Soluble CD4 (sCD4) D1D2 HIS tagged gene was synthesized using GeneArt gene synthesis service and the protein produced in HEK293T/17 cells using PEI-transfection as for 17b production. sCD4 protein was purified using a cOmplete® His-Tag purification column (Roche) following manufacturer’s instructions.

Patients and tissue explants

Cervical tissue was obtained from patients undergoing planned therapeutic hysterectomy at St. Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St George’s Hospital, and Kingston Hospital in London, UK. Penile tissue was obtained from patients undergoing gender reassignment at Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK, and having ceased hormonal therapy a minimum of 6 weeks prior to surgery. Surgically-resected specimens of colorectal tissue were collected at St George’s Hospital and at St. Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. All tissues were collected after receiving signed informed consent from all patients under approved protocols by the Wandsworth Research Ethics Committee (01.31.3, 05/Q0803/86 & 99.4) and through the Imperial College Healthcare Tissue Bank approved by Research Ethics Committee Wales (IRAS 17/WA/0161). All patients were HIV negative. On arrival at the laboratory, a maximum of 1 h post-operation, resected tissue was cut into 2–3 mm3 explants comprising both epithelial and stromal tissue or muscularis mucosae, depending on the tissue, as described previously[2527]. Cervical and penile explants were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), and antibiotics (100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml). Colorectal explants were maintained with DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2mM L-glutamine and antibiotics (100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml, 80 μg of gentamicin /ml). All tissues were incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Infectivity and inhibition assays

All inhibition assays in cellular and tissue explant models were performed using a standardized amount of virus culture supernatant normalized for infectivity. TZM-bl cells were incubated with serial dilutions of compounds for 1 h at 37°C, and then virus was added to cells and left for the duration of the experiment. The extent of virus replication was determined by luciferase quantitation of cell lysates after 48 h (Promega, Madison, WI) as previously described[26].

To determine the activity of the compound against infection of iDCs, cells were exposed to compound just prior to addition of virus. After 2 h of incubation, cells were washed and kept in culture for a total of 7 days in the absence or presence of drug for 24 h or for the 7 days of culture. Inhibitory potency against transmission of cell-associated virus was measured with iDCs exposed to virus for 2 h, washed 3 times with PBS to remove unbound virus, and co-cultured with PM-1 cells at a 1:2 ratio of infected cells:PM-1 cells (equivalent to 1×104 infected cells:2×104 PM-1 cells) in the presence or absence of compound. Co-cultures were incubated with compound for different time periods: 2h, 24h or sustained (maintained throughout the culture). Cells were cultured for 14 days, with 50% media feeds every 2–3 days. The extent of virus replication was determined by measurement of p24 antigen levels in culture supernatants with the Innotest HIV antigen kit (Innogenetics, Belgium).

Cervical and penile explants were incubated with compound for 1 h before virus (104 TCID50/ml) was added for 2 h. Explants were then washed four times with PBS and cultured in complete medium in the presence (sustained) or absence (pulse) of drug for 24 h at 37°C. Tissue explants were then transferred to fresh microtiter plates and migratory cells left in the original plate were washed twice with PBS and co-cultured with 4×104 PM-1 cells/well with or without compound in fresh 96-well plates. Tissue explants and cellular co-cultures were cultured for further 14 days in the presence or absence of compound. Approximately 50 % of the supernatants of explants and cellular cultures were harvested every 2 – 3 days, and both cultures were re-fed with fresh media in the presence or absence of compound.

Colorectal tissue explants were exposed to drug 1 h prior to virus exposure (104 TCID50/ml). After 2 h of viral challenge, explants were washed four times with PBS begore being transferred on gel foam rafts (Welbeck Pharmaceuticals, United Kingdom) and cultured for 15 days in the presence (sustained) or absence (pulse) of compound. Approximately 50 % of the supernatants were harvested every 2 – 3 days and explants were re-fed with fresh media with or without drug.

For all tissue explant models and migratory/PM-1 cells co-cultures, the extent of virus replication was determined by measuring the p24 antigen concentration in supernatants (HIV-1 p24 ELISA, AIDS Vaccine Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MA)[26].

Biolayer interferometry (BLI) binding analysis

Real time binding assays between purified IgG 17b and purified recombinant Env protein of HIV-1CN54-gp140 in the presence/absence of purified recombinant soluble CD4 (sCD4) and DS003 were performed using BLI on an Octet K2 instrument (ForteBio, Fremont, CA). Briefly, anti-human IgG Fc capture biosensors were hydrated for 10 min in kinetics buffer (DPBS + 0.1% BSA + 0.02% Tween-20) immediately prior to use. CN54-gp140 alone or mixed with sCD4 and DS003 in 200 μl of kinetics buffer was loaded into black 96-well microplates.

Following optimization of biosensor coating density with 17b, a concentration of 10 μg/ml was chosen. Titration of HIV-1CN54 gp140 allowed us to select 100 μg/ml as the best concentration to obtain maximum full binding curve of sCD4-gp140 complex within the resolution of the instrument. Response of HIV-1CN54 gp140 + sCD4 complex to 17b was established by titration of sCD4 in the presence of HIV-1CN54 gp140 at 100 μg/ml, and plateau level was reached with 5 μg/ml of sCD4. Biosensors were loaded with 17b to half saturation and washed with kinetics buffer before being transferred into analyte, where the association rate constant (Ka) was measured. The biosensors were then transferred into kinetics buffer to measure the dissociation rate constant (Kd). Biosensors were regenerated using 0.1 M glycine, pH 1.5, before measuring subsequent samples. Values from a 17b-coated biosensor transferred into kinetics buffer alone were subtracted from all test values. All analyses were conducted at 22°C with a plate shaking speed of 1,000 r.p.m. Binding kinetics were calculated using the ForteBio Data Analysis software package fitting the observed dissociation curves to a 1:1 model to calculate the rate constants. Using a 2 to 1 binding model, representative of a trimeric Env, did not alter the goodness of fit.

Flow cytometry

HEK293T/17 cells were transfected with plasmid DNA expressing Env or with an empty pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) and surface expression of Env analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells were transfected with PEI MAX 40,000 (Polysciences) using a 1:3 DNA to PEI ratio (w:w). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, cells were rinsed with PBS, resuspended in FACS buffer (2.5% FBS, 1 mM EDTA, 25 mM HEPES in 1X PBS) and stained with LIVE/DEAD fixable Aqua dye (1:400) (Life Technologies). Cells were then washed twice with FACS buffer prior to staining with 10 μg/ml of anti-Env 17b human IgG. DS003 and/or sCD4 were added to the cells before, during or after 17b mAb staining as required. Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer after each incubation. Following incubation with secondary F(ab’)2-goat anti-human IgG Fc PE Ab (Invitrogen), cells were fixed with 1.5% formaldehyde (Polysciences). Data were acquired on a LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD) using FACSDiva (BD) and analyzed using FlowJo v.10.1 software (Treestar).

Statistical and mathematical analysis

50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated from sigmoid curve fitted (Prism, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA) fulfilling the criterion of R2>0.7. P values were determined using a two-tailed Student t test (both paired and unpaired), and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

DS003 is more active than BMS-378806 against HIV-1 clade B isolates

Non-formulated DS003 demonstrated greater inhibitory activity than its analog BMS-378806 against HIV-1BaL in TZM-bl cells with an IC50 for DS003 of 1.09 ± 0.34 nM, compared to 191.45 ± 295.90 nM for BMS-378806 (Figure 1a).

Figure 1. Anti-HIV-1 activity of DS003 in cellular models.

Figure 1.

TZM-bl cells were treated for 1 h in the presence or absence of DS003 or BMS-806, before addition of HIV-1BaL (a, b) or clade B primary isolates (b). Luciferase expression (r.l.u. values) was determined after 48 h and the extent of inhibition by each drug was calculated. (c) iDCs grown from PBMC-derived monocytes were challenged with HIV-1BaL for 2 h in the presence or absence of DS003. Cells were then washed and cultured in the absence or presence of drug for 24 h or for the remaining time of culture. Alternatively, (d) iDCs were exposed to HIV-1BaL for 2 h, washed with PBS to remove unbound virus and then cocultured with PM-1 cells in the presence or absence of DS003 for different time periods: 2 h pulse, 24 h pulse or continuously. The concentrations of p24 in harvested supernatants were quantified by ELISA and the extent of inhibition was calculated. The percentage of inhibition in all models was normalized relative to the r.l.u. or the p24 values obtained for cells not exposed to virus (0% infectivity) and for cells infected with virus in the absence of compound (100% infectivity). Data for each model are means (± s.d) from three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

The activity of DS003 was then tested against four transmitted founder clade B primary R5-tropic HIV-1 isolates from males infected either via heterosexual transmission (HIV-1B3 and HIV-1B8) or unknown transmission mode (HIV-1B14 and HIV-1B17). All four transmitted founder strains tested were inhibited by DS003 in the TZM-bl cell model, although strains HIV-1B8 and HIV-1B14 appeared to be more sensitive to DS003, with IC50s of <0.004 and 0.031 nM, respectively (Figure 1b).

Inhibitory potency of DS003 in iDC cultures

Infection of iDCs was inhibited by a 2 h pulse exposure to DS003 with an IC50 of 2.37 ± 0.46 nM. Longer exposure to DS003, for 24 h, increased the inhibitory potency (IC50 = 0.35 ± 0.16 nM) to the same level as that observed with sustained exposure (IC50 = 0.29 ± 0.21 nM) (Figure 1c).

Furthermore, DS003 was active against iDC trans-infection of CD4+ T cells with sustained exposure to compound during culture (IC50 = 1.36 ± 0.54 nM) (Figure 1d); however, activity was significantly reduced with 2 h pulse exposures to compound as shown by an increase of the IC50 to 509.61 ± 221.10 nM. Activity remained at the low nM level (IC50 = 19.76 ± 6.00 nM) when the compound was maintained for the first 24 h of culture. Thus, DS003 is likely to be most active against this pathway if sustained for a minimum of 24 h following exposure to virus.

DS003 prevents infection and dissemination of HIV-1 in reproductive tract tissues

DS003 demonstrated high levels of inhibition in penile explants when left in for the duration of the assay (IC50 = 7.29 ± 5.69 nM). The inhibitory potency of DS003 progressively decreased with reduction of dosing time (IC50 = 67.63 ± 84.93 nM for 24 h drug exposure and IC50 = 265.30 ± 369.33 nM for pulse dosing) (Figure 2a). In migratory cell co-cultures, complete inhibition within the range of concentrations tested was only observed with sustained exposure to DS003 (IC50 < 1 nM; IC95 = 17.61 ± 20.14 nM) (Figure 2b).

Figure 2. Inhibitory potency of DS003 in mucosal tissue explants and migratory cells.

Figure 2.

Penile (a), ecto-cervical (c) and colorectal (e) tissue explants were either treated with drug for the duration of viral exposure (2 h pulse, ●) or for 24 h (24 h pulse, ⭕). Explants were then washed with PBS and cultured in the presence (sustained, ×) or absence of drug for 15 days. Following overnight culture, penile and ecto-cervical explants were transferred to fresh plates. Cells having migrated out of the tissue explants (penile (b) and ecto-cervical (d)) during the overnight culture, where collected and co-cultured with PM-1 cells. The concentrations of p24 in the harvested supernatants were quantified by ELISA and the extent of inhibition was calculated. Data for each model are the mean (± s.d) from three independent experiments performed in triplicates.

Similarly, sustained exposure of cervical explants to DS003 was required for inhibition of ex vivo challenge with HIV-1BaL (IC50 < 1 nM; IC95 = 23.62 ± 28.92 nM) (Figure 2c). No inhibitory activity was observed with pulse or 24 h dosing within the range of DS003 concentrations tested (Figure 2c). Dose-response curves were obtained for DS003 against viral dissemination by migratory dendritic cells. Sustained exposure of migratory cells/T cells co-cultures to DS003 resulted in greater inhibitory potency (IC50 = 5.95 ± 8.27 nM) than shorter dosing periods (IC50 = 240.29 ± 338.18 nM for 24 h exposure; IC50 = 216.99 ± 304.27 nM for pulse dosing) (Figure 2d).

Inhibitory activity of DS003 in colorectal tissue

Pulsed treatment of colorectal explants with DS003 during viral exposure (2 h) inhibited ex vivo infection of this mucosal tissue, with an IC50 value at day 15 post-infection of 88.91 ± 43.46 nM (Figure 2e). Sustained exposure to DS003 resulted in an increase of inhibitory activity with IC50 values below the range of concentrations tested and plateauing after the lowest concentration of DS003 tested (IC95 = 701.65 ± 72.36 nM).

Binding of DS003 to HIV-1 Env

To better understand the mechanism of action of DS003, competition studies were performed to determine potential blockade of HIV Env binding to human CD4. We used an anti-gp120 monoclonal antibody, 17b, that recognizes an epitope exposed following binding of gp120 to CD4, known as CD4-induced epitope[28]. As expected, using BLI technology, binding of 17b to HIV-1CN54-gp140 was only observed in the presence of sCD4 and increased in a dose-response manner until plateauing at 5 μg/ml (data not shown). The binding of 17b to HIV-1CN54-gp140 pre-treated with sCD4, decreased with increasing concentrations of DS003 (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Binding analysis of 17b to HIV-1CN54 gp140 + sCD4 complex in the presence of DS003 by biolayer interferometry.

Figure 3.

Capture of HIV-1CN54 gp140 (100 μg/ml) alone or complexed with sCD4 (5 μg/ml) by 17b at 10 μg/ml was assessed in the absence and with increasing concentrations of DS003. (a) Change of wavelength (Δλ) is shown vs the length of the experiment. The dashed line represents the end of the association step (250 s). Curve fit data (a) and binding kinetics (b) were calculated by ForteBio Data analysis software and are the mean of up to six runs.

Previous studies[29, 30] have shown that HIV-1BaL Env has a partially open conformation that allows binding of 17b in the absence of sCD4. To assess if DS003 could inhibit the naturally occurring binding of 17b to HIV-1BaL Env, we used 293T cells transfected with HIV-1BaL gp160. As expected, staining with 17b was observed in the absence of sCD4 (Figure 4a). Treatment with increasing concentrations of DS003 prevented binding of 17b in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4a), confirming that DS003 interferes with the exposure of the 17b epitope on Env. We then assessed the activity of DS003 in the presence of sCD4. When cells were treated with DS003 prior to addition of sCD4 or dosed simultaneously with DS003 and sCD4, 17b staining was reduced to the baseline level of 17b binding in the absence of sCD4 (Figure 4b). However, incubation with sCD4 prior to DS003 treatment, did not decrease 17b binding (Figure 4b); indicating that DS003 prevents but cannot reverse sCD4-induced conformational changes of HIV-1 Env.

Figure 4. Effect of sCD4 and DS003 on 17b binding to HIV-1BaL gp160 expressed on 293T cells.

Figure 4.

HEK 293T cells (106 cells/condition) transfected with HIV-1BaL gp160 were (a) treated with increasing concentrations of DS003 for 20 min at room temperature prior to immunostaining with 17b or (b) exposed simultaneously or sequentially to DS003 10 mM, sCD4 40 μg/ml and/or 17b 10 μg/ml. Non-specific fluorescence was determined with mock transfected cells.

Effect of DS003 on a HIV-1 fusion inhibitor

We then hypothesized that DS003, thanks to its capacity to block CD4-induced conformational changes that lead to the formation of the gp41 six-helix bundle, would be a good candidate to combine with a fusion inhibitor. The activity of DS003 alone and in combination with a potent fusion inhibitor based on the C34 sequence of gp41 HR2, L’644[31] was compared in several cellular and tissue models. In TZM-bl cells, an increase of activity was observed for L’644 when combined with DS003, which resulted in an IC50 for L’644 41.05 ± 28.85 times lower than when tested alone (Figure 5a, f). However, in ex vivo models including PBMCs, co-cultures of ecto-cervical migratory cells with PM-1 CD4+T cells, and ecto-cervical and colorectal explants cultures (Figure 5b, c, d, e), the DS003-L’644 combination showed greater inhibitory potency than either of the two drugs tested individually (Figure 5f).

Figure 5. Activity of DS003 and L’644 in dual combinations against HIV-1BaL in TZM-bl cells and colorectal explants.

Figure 5.

TZM-bl cells (a) and PBMCs (b) were treated for 1h in the presence or absence of drugs alone and/or in combination. HIV-1BaL was added to cells and left for the time of the experiment (48 h for TZM-bl cells and 7 days for PBMCs). Ecto-cervical (c) and colorectal explants (e) were treated for 1h in the presence or absence of drugs alone and/or in combination and then exposed to virus for 2 h before four washes with PBS. Colorectal explants were then transferred to gelfoam rafts. For ecto- cervical tissue, following overnight culture, explants were transferred to fresh plates and migratory cells co-cultured with PM-1 cells (d). Mucosal cultures were kept for 15 days. Infection was determined by measurement of luciferase expression in TZM-bl cells or of virion protein, p24 antigen, in the harvested supernatants from PBMCs and mucosal cultures. The extent of inhibition by each compound or combination was calculated (e). Data for each model are means (± sd) from three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

DISCUSSION

DS003 proved to be more potent against HIV-1 than the related compound BMS-378806 in the TZM-bl assay. BMS-378806 has previously been shown to be protective in vivo against simian–human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-162P3) in macaques[10], and therefore these data suggest that DS003 is also likely to be effective in vivo. DS003 was active against primary transmitted strains proving efficacy against biologically relevant isolates. In several models, DS003 was only active, or demonstrated improved activity, when the test system was exposed continuously to the drug. This is consistent with the presumed mechanism of action of DS003, which targets HIV-1 prior to entry into host cells and therefore, likely requires inhibitory concentrations to be present in the extracellular compartment. For example, activity against transmission of virus from dendritic cells to T cells was most potent under continuous exposure to drug but was still in the low nanomolar range when sustained for only 24 hours. DS003 showed good activity against HIV infection of penile, cervical and colorectal tissue explants demonstrating efficacy in relevant tissue models, although again, activity was most pronounced when compound was maintained throughout the culture period. The inhibition of viral dissemination by migratory cells indicates that DS003 may be active in preventing trans-infection via migratory DC populations from the localized site of infection to draining lymph nodes in vivo. Mirroring the data obtained with the DC trans-infection model, DS003 was more potent against trans-infection via migratory cells when maintained in culture. These data suggest DS003 would be most effective against HIV-1 transmission if delivered locally by sustained release technology.

We observed different levels of inhibition in the three mucosal tissue tested. Contrary to other entry inhibitors whose mechanism of action is based on the binding to CD4 or to the viral co-receptors, DS003 binds to gp120. Hence, the differential activity of DS003 in the tissue explant and migratory cell models is not only linked to the state of activation of the target cells, but to other factors such as the accessibility of the virus for the drug within the mucosal milieu. Different levels and viscosity of mucosal secretions[32] as well as cellular drug transporters[33] could reduce the drug availability in certain mucosal compartments. Furthermore, the lack of inhibition observed in ecto-cervical tissue explants following pulse or 24 h dosing with DS003 (Figure 2c) correlates with the in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles observed during the IPM042 trial[11, 12]. First, the DS003 vaginal tablet tested in the trial, is not a sustained delivery formulation, and showed a time to peak concentration in vaginal fluid of 0.5–12h with rapid subsequent decrease of concentration. Second, no protection was observed with the 1 mg vaginal tablet, resulting in a maximum concentration (Cmax) in vaginal fluid of 281μg/g which is significantly above the higher concentration used ex vivo in tissue explants of 1 μM (equivalent to 95,7 ng DS003/tissue explant well). Topical dosing with the 10 mg vaginal tablet (Cmax in vaginal fluid of 1078 μg/g) provided limited protection against ex vivo challenge of cervical biopsies (6/9); thus, indicating that a sustain delivery formulation would be more desirable for this drug as observed in ecto-cervical explants.

Technically, among the infection control replicates for each specimen, 100% of explants were productively infected.

We evaluated the potential activity of DS003 and L’644 combinations. These drugs have different mechanism of action and currently are not in use for therapy, reducing the potential for transmission of circulating resistant isolates and making them good candidates for PrEP.

With the approval of prevention interventions, such as Truvada and Descovy, the inclusion of placebo arms in trials is becoming ethically questionable and the incidence of infection within communities will decrease. Furthermore, adherence has been an important factor affecting the progress of PrEP candidates in the product development pipeline, and sustained release formulations are currently being prioritized. We have previously shown that sustained release results in greater inhibitory potency of entry and fusion inhibitors such as maraviroc[34] and L’644[31]. Hence, pre-clinical models are becoming increasingly important tools to facilitate and accelerate prioritization of PrEP candidate and their formulations for clinical testing. This study further validates the importance of tissue explants as a pre-clinical model which reflects the tissue and dosing-dependent efficacy of DS003.

Mechanistic studies suggest the DS003 prevents CD4 induced viral fusion. However, it does not appear that DS003 blocks the binding of gp120 to CD4.

In conclusion, DS003 demonstrated potent activity against HIV-1 in a variety of models designed to evaluate its potential as a microbicide. The data support the development of this compound as a prophylactic to prevent sexual transmission of HIV and suggest that it may be most effective in sustained release formulations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Robert Haggar, David Melville, and the Colorectal Surgery Team, St. George’s Hospital, London, for their assistance in obtaining human colorectal tissue. We are grateful to St. Mary’s Hospital, Kingston Hospital and St. George’s Hospital, London, for the donation of cervical tissue. We are most grateful to James Bellringer, Consultant Urologist and Gender Surgeon of Charing Cross Hospital, London, for provision of penile tissue samples. We thank the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM) for donation of L’644 (DS007).

This work was funded by IPM and NIH grant U19 AI76982-04 and supported by an equipment grant from the Fondation Dormeur.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: CH has received research grants from Gilead, EDCTP and CIHR. DS is an employee and shareholder of Janssen, a pharmaceutical company of Johnson & Johnson, but all work was described was completed before current position. JN is an employee of the International Partnership for Microbicides. RS has received research grants from MRC, CEPI, IPM, EU Commission Horizon 20202, EPSRC, UKRI and BMGF. For the remaining authors none were declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Van Herrewege Y, Morellato L, Descours A, Aerts L, Michiels J, Heyndrickx L, et al. CD4 mimetic miniproteins: potent anti-HIV compounds with promising activity as microbicides. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61(4):818–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dereuddre-Bosquet N, Morellato-Castillo L, Brouwers J, Augustijns P, Bouchemal K, Ponchel G, et al. MiniCD4 microbicide prevents HIV infection of human mucosal explants and vaginal transmission of SHIV(162P3) in cynomolgus macaques. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8(12):e1003071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Si Z, Madani N, Cox JM, Chruma JJ, Klein JC, Schon A, et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of HIV-1 entry block receptor-induced conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101(14):5036–5041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zou S, Zhang S, Gaffney A, Ding H, Lu M, Grover JR, et al. Long-Acting BMS-378806 Analogues Stabilize the State-1 Conformation of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoproteins. J Virol 2020; 94(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kadow J, Wang HG, Lin PF. Small-molecule HIV-1 gp120 inhibitors to prevent HIV-1 entry: an emerging opportunity for drug development. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2006; 7(8):721–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ho HT, Fan L, Nowicka-Sans B, McAuliffe B, Li CB, Yamanaka G, et al. Envelope conformational changes induced by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 attachment inhibitors prevent CD4 binding and downstream entry events. J Virol 2006; 80(8):4017–4025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nowicka-Sans B, Gong YF, McAuliffe B, Dicker I, Ho HT, Zhou N, et al. In vitro antiviral characteristics of HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, the active component of the prodrug BMS-663068. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56(7):3498–3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hanna GJ, Lalezari J, Hellinger JA, Wohl DA, Nettles R, Persson A, et al. Antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety of BMS-488043, a novel oral small-molecule HIV-1 attachment inhibitor, in HIV-1-infected subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55(2):722–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nettles RE, Schurmann D, Zhu L, Stonier M, Huang SP, Chang I, et al. Pharmacodynamics, safety, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-663068, an oral HIV-1 attachment inhibitor in HIV-1-infected subjects. J Infect Dis 2012; 206(7):1002–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Veazey RS, Klasse PJ, Schader SM, Hu Q, Ketas TJ, Lu M, et al. Protection of macaques from vaginal SHIV challenge by vaginally delivered inhibitors of virus-cell fusion. Nature 2005; 438(7064):99–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Friend C, Steytler J, van Niekerk N, Nuttall J, Brid Devlin B, Spence P, et al. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of DS003 When Administered to Women as a Vaginal Tablet. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 2018; 34(S1):181. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nuttall J, Ariën K, Michiels J, Krit M, Vanham G, van Tilburg P, et al. Pharmacodynamic Activity of DS003, a Novel gp120 Blocker, When Administered to Women as a Vaginal Tablet. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 2018; 34(S1):341. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Derdeyn CA, Decker JM, Sfakianos JN, Wu X, O’Brien WA, Ratner L, et al. Sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to the fusion inhibitor T-20 is modulated by coreceptor specificity defined by the V3 loop of gp120. J Virol 2000; 74(18):8358–8367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Platt EJ, Wehrly K, Kuhmann SE, Chesebro B, Kabat D. Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 1998; 72(4):2855–2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wei X, Decker JM, Liu H, Zhang Z, Arani RB, Kilby JM, et al. Emergence of resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in patients receiving fusion inhibitor (T-20) monotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46(6):1896–1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lusso P, Cocchi F, Balotta C, Markham PD, Louie A, Farci P, et al. Growth of macrophage-tropic and primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in a unique CD4+ T-cell clone (PM1): failure to downregulate CD4 and to interfere with cell-line-tropic HIV-1. J Virol 1995; 69(6):3712–3720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gordon CJ, Muesing MA, Proudfoot AE, Power CA, Moore JP, Trkola A. Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by the CC-chemokine RANTES is independent of the mechanism of virus-cell fusion. J Virol 1999; 73(1):684–694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gartner S, Markovits P, Markovitz DM, Kaplan MH, Gallo RC, Popovic M. The role of mononuclear phagocytes in HTLV-III/LAV infection. Science 1986; 233(4760):215–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Keele BF, Giorgi EE, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Decker JM, Pham KT, Salazar MG, et al. Identification and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105(21):7552–7557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cheeseman HM, Day S, McFarlane LR, Fleck S, Miller A, Cole T, et al. Combined Skin and Muscle DNA Priming Provides Enhanced Humoral Responses to a Human Immunodeficency Virus Type 1 Clade C Envelope Vaccine. Hum Gene Ther 2018; 29(9):1011–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Katinger D, Jeffs S, Altmann F, Cope A, McKay P, Almond N, et al. CN54gp140: product characteristics, peclinical and clinical use - recombinant glycoprotein for HIV immunization. Retrovirology 2012; 9(2):P351. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cosgrove CA, Lacey CJ, Cope AV, Bartolf A, Morris G, Yan C, et al. Comparative Immunogenicity of HIV-1 gp140 Vaccine Delivered by Parenteral, and Mucosal Routes in Female Volunteers; MUCOVAC2, A Randomized Two Centre Study. PLoS One 2016; 11(5):e0152038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kratochvil S, McKay PF, Kopycinski JT, Bishop C, Hayes PJ, Muir L, et al. A Phase 1 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccine Trial for Cross-Profiling the Kinetics of Serum and Mucosal Antibody Responses to CN54gp140 Modulated by Two Homologous Prime-Boost Vaccine Regimens. Frontiers in Immunology 2017; 8(595). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lewis DJ, Fraser CA, Mahmoud AN, Wiggins RC, Woodrow M, Cope A, et al. Phase I randomised clinical trial of an HIV-1(CN54), clade C, trimeric envelope vaccine candidate delivered vaginally. PLoS One 2011; 6(9):e25165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fischetti L, Barry SM, Hope TJ, Shattock RJ. HIV-1 infection of human penile explant tissue and protection by candidate microbicides. Aids 2009; 23(3):319–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herrera C, Cranage M, McGowan I, Anton P, Shattock RJ. Reverse transcriptase inhibitors as potential colorectal microbicides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53(5):1797–1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu Q, Frank I, Williams V, Santos JJ, Watts P, Griffin GE, et al. Blockade of attachment and fusion receptors inhibits HIV-1 infection of human cervical tissue. J Exp Med 2004; 199(8):1065–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thali M, Moore JP, Furman C, Charles M, Ho DD, Robinson J, et al. Characterization of conserved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 neutralization epitopes exposed upon gp120-CD4 binding. J Virol 1993; 67(7):3978–3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoffman TL, LaBranche CC, Zhang W, Canziani G, Robinson J, Chaiken I, et al. Stable exposure of the coreceptor-binding site in a CD4-independent HIV-1 envelope protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96(11):6359–6364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tran EE, Borgnia MJ, Kuybeda O, Schauder DM, Bartesaghi A, Frank GA, et al. Structural mechanism of trimeric HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein activation. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8(7):e1002797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harman S, Herrera C, Armanasco N, Nuttall J, Shattock RJ. Preclinical evaluation of the HIV-1 fusion inhibitor L’644 as a potential candidate microbicide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56(5):2347–2356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cone RA. Mucus. In: Mucosal Immunology. Jiri Mestecky MEL, Jerry McGhee R., John Bienenstock, Lloyd Mayer, Warren Strober, (editor), Third Edition edn: Academic Press; 2005. pp. 49–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu M, Patel SK, Zhou T, Rohan LC. Drug transporters in tissues and cells relevant to sexual transmission of HIV: Implications for drug delivery. J Control Release 2015; 219:681–696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fletcher P, Herrera C, Armanasco N, Nuttall J, Shattock RJ. Short Communication: Limited Anti-HIV-1 Activity of Maraviroc in Mucosal Tissues. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2016; 32(4):334–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES