Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2021 Aug 19;8:704666. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.704666

Metformin in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yin Li 1, Xue Yang 2, Peijing Yan 2, Tong Sun 3, Zhi Zeng 4,*, Sheyu Li 5,6,*
PMCID: PMC8416892  PMID: 34490296

Abstract

Importance/Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a critical public health issue. Evidence has shown that metformin favorably influences COVID-19 outcomes. This study aimed to assess the benefits and risks of metformin in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from inception to February 18, 2021. Observational studies assessing the association between metformin use and the outcomes of COVID-19 patients were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes included intubation, deterioration, and hospitalization. Random-effects weighted models were used to pool the specific effect sizes. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stratifying the meta-analysis by region, diabetic status, the adoption of multivariate model, age, risk of bias, and timing for adding metformin.

Results: We identified 28 studies with 2,910,462 participants. Meta-analysis of 19 studies showed that metformin is associated with 34% lower COVID-19 mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.78; I2 = 67.9%] and 27% lower hospitalization rate (pooled OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53–1.00; I2 = 16.8%). However, we did not identify any subgroup effects. The meta-analysis did not identify statistically significant association between metformin and intubation and deterioration of COVID-19 (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77–1.16; I2 = 0.0% for intubation and OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.65–6.34; I2 = 79.4% for deterioration of COVID-19), respectively.

Conclusions: Metformin use among COVID-19 patients was associated with a reduced risk of mortality and hospitalization. Our findings suggest a relative benefit for metformin use in nursing home and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the association between metformin use and COVID-19 outcomes.

Study Registration: The study was registered on the PROSPERO on Feb 23, 2021 (CRD42021238722).

Keywords: metformin, COVID-19, mortality, hospitalization, intubation, deterioration

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is changing the everyday life of human-being globally (1). The overall COVID-19 mortality has reached 5% worldwide, with 1/4 of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring intensive care (2, 3). Novel approaches targeting COVID-19 is called in emergency (4, 5).

Type 2 diabetes is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide (6), affecting over 100 million adults in China (7, 8). Both elevated and fluctuated glucose levels are leading to the death and complication in people living with type 2 diabetes (9, 10). Type 2 diabetes shares common risk factors with COVID-19 fatality including age, sex, and obesity (11), and type 2 diabetes itself is one of the top risk factors for the prognosis of COVID-19 (12). Metformin is one of the most widely used anti-diabetic drugs in the past few decades (13–15). In addition to the effect of lowering blood glucose, metformin protects diabetic people from cardiovascular disease, microvascular complications of diabetes and neoplasm (16, 17).

Although a recent large cohort from England (18) and a meta-analyses (19, 20) suggested that metformin using was associated with lower mortality of COVID-19 patients, the potential benefits of metformin in patients with COVID-19 remain uncertain. The heterogeneous reporting may be attributed to different study design, health care system, study population and statistical approaches. We, therefore, conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of metformin use on COVID-19 mortality and other patient-important outcomes across various populations and studies.

Methods

Study Registration

The study was registered on the PROSPERO on Feb 23, 2021 (CRD42021238722).

Search Strategy

Our study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (21). The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from inception to February 18, 2021. The medical subject headings and keywords searched consisted of “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “coronavirus,” and “metformin.” The detailed search strategy for PubMed is shown in Supplementary Table 1. The hand-search from the references and citations supplements the relevant literature. We searched the literature using a combination of titles/abstracts and medical subject headings. Studies were included if they: (1) were designed as cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies; (2) compared the rates of death, risk of intubation, disease deterioration, hospitalization, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acidosis, and heart failure in COVID-19 patients with and without using metformin, and (3) reported the effect size including odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), or hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We excluded abstracts, case reports, letters, reviews, meta-analyses, registered clinical trials not yet completed, and studies that were not English publications. Two authors (YL and TS) independently screened the titles and abstracts identified from the aforementioned databases, and then, full-text articles were read to assess eligibility. Divergences were resolved with the help of a third evaluator (ZZ).

Data Extraction

Data were extracted according to a standardized form and included basic information (i.e., first author name, publication year, region, study design), data on participants (i.e., sample size, age, sex, diabetic status, follow-up duration), and data on outcomes [i.e., death, intubation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), disease deterioration, length of stay, adverse events]. We contacted the corresponding authors to request any missing or unclear data and excluded the study if data was not supplied. Multivariable-adjusted ORs, RRs, or HRs and their 95% CIs were extracted from the models with full adjustment for potential confounders if more than one model was established.

Risk of Bias Assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies (22). The risks were estimated using the following three terms: patient selection (4 items), study comparability (1 item), and outcome assessment (3 items), and the results were divided into three grades according to the total score (good, 7–9; fair, 5–6; poor, 0–4).

Data Syntheses

By identifying a newly published large-scale study in England, we added an exploratory sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the results. The following analyses were performed to estimate the association between metformin use and mortality among COVID-19 patients. Heterogeneity was estimated using I2 statistics. We used random-effects weighted models to pool the specific effect sizes and their 95% CIs if I2 was >50%, while the fixed-effects weighted models were used if I2 was ≤ 50%. RRs and HRs were regarded as approximates for ORs.

Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted by stratifying the meta-analysis by region (Europe, Asia, or America), diabetic status (population with or without diabetes), the adoption of multivariate model (adopt or not), age (<60 years, ≥60 years, or not available), risk of bias (poor, fair, and good), and timing for metformin administration (before and after the diagnosis of COVID-19). We applied visual funnel plots, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests to assess for potential publication bias (23). In addition, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by excluding the study with the largest number of sample size and an influencing analysis by successively excluding one study at a time to evaluate whether the result was robust. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 15.0 Software (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA), and two-tailed P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Study Selection and Characteristics

We identified 294 articles during the literature search and one by hand-search, and included 19 studies with 2,903,435 patients for the meta-analysis of the association between metformin use and risk of mortality (Supplementary Figure 1) (24–50). The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2. Of these 28 studies, two were pre-print studies. Seven of the 28 included studies were conducted in America; 14, Asia; and 7, Europe. According to the quality assessment criteria, 16 studies were of good quality; 11, fair quality; and 1 study, poor quality (Supplementary Table 3).

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

References Country Region Study design Sample sizes M/C Population with COVID-19 Follow-up time (day) COVID-19 definition Risk of bias score
Proportion of diabetes Age (year) mean ± SD Male (n, %)
Izzi Engbeaya et al. (39) UK Europe Retrospective cohort study 169/168 1.00 65.8 ± 17.5 202, 60.0% 30 SARS-CoV-2 swab-positive (RT-PCR) 5
Mirsoleymani et al. (45) Iran Asia Retrospective cohort study 36/69 0.11 59.8 ± 17.2 76, 72.5% 8 to 25 Chest CT 6
Liu et al. (43) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 18/46 0.33 66.0 ± 3.0 35, 54.7% NA SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR) 7
Jiang et al. (40) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 100/228 1.00 66.1 ± 4.1 174, 53.1% NA WHO interim guidance and the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Coronavirus Pneumonia (trial version 7) released by National Health Commission of China 8
Wang et al. (28) UK Europe Retrospective cohort study 10183/10183 1.00 67.5 ± 12.5 10,623, 52.2% NA SARS-CoV-2 swab-positive (RT-PCR)or positive anti-body tests 9
Choi et al. (35) South Korea Asia Retrospective cohort study 12/281 0.72 29.0 ± 5.0 214,73.0% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasal and oropharyngeal swabs-positive 7
Kim et al. (41) South Korea Asia Retrospectively observational study 113/969 0.22 >18 384, 35.5% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasal and oropharyngeal swabs-positive 8
Orioli et al. (27) Belgium Europe Retrospective study 45/23 0.89 69.0 ± 14.0 35, 48.0% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasal and oropharyngeal swabs-positive 6
Do et al. (38) South Korea Asia Retrospective study 469/1301 1.00 60.7 1,056, 59.7% NA ICD-10-CM 8
Bramante et al. (24) US America Retrospective cohort study 2333/3923 1.00 74.9 ± 4.2 2,954, 47.2% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR), or manual chart review by UHG, or reported from thr hospital to UHG 6
Lally et al. (25) US America Retrospective cohort study 127/476 0.40 75.9 ± 11.2 586, 97.2% 30 SARS-CoV-2 infection 8
Cheng et al. (34) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 678/535 1.00 63.3 ± 3.5 632, 52.1% NA NA 8
Luo et al. (44) China Asia Retrospective study 104/179 1.00 64.3 ± 3.4 156, 55.1% NA The diagnosis procedures of COVID-19 were referred to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pneumonia Infected by Novel Coronavirus issued by the National Health Commission of China. 6
Li et al. (5) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 37/94 1.00 66.8 ± 11.6 74, 56.5% 60 SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasal and oropharyngeal swabs-positive 6
Lalau et al. (51) France Europe Nationwide observational study 1496/953 1.00 70.9 ± 12.5 1,568, 64.0% 28 SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasal and oropharyngeal swabs-positive 6
Crouse et al. (36) US America Retrospective study 76/144 1.00 NA 272, 45.0% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) respiratory specimens-positive 7
Perez-Belmonte et al. (46) Spain Europe Retrospective cohort study 1618/1048 1.00 74.9 ± 8.4 1,647, 61.9% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) 7
Bramante et al. (30) US America Retrospective cohort study NA/NA NA 46.0 ± 28.2 2,680, 40.0% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR)-positive 6
Bramante et al. (32) US America Retrospective cohort study 2333/3923 1.00 70.0 ± 16.3 2,954, 47.2% 90 SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR), or manual chart review by UHG, or reported from the hospital to UHG 8
Bramante et al. (24) US America Retrospective cohort study 676/8879 0.205 55.0 ± 16.8 4,519, 47.3% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) -positive 8
Cariou et al. (33) France Europe Retrospective study 746/571 0.885 69.8 ± 13.0 855, 64.9% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) -positive and/or clinically/radiologically (i.e., as ground-glass opacity and/or crazy paving on chest computed tomography [CT] scan) 4
Nafakhi et al. (26) Iraq Asia Retrospective observational study 35/157 0.349 50.2 ± 15.7 91, 47.4% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs-positive 8
Yitao et al. (48) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 9/248 0.058 46.0 ± 17.0 140, 54.0% 20 SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs-positive 6
Al Hayek et al. (29) Saudi Arabia Asia Retrospective study 700/106 1.00 57.6 ± 13.9 441, 54.7% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs-positive 7
Zhang et al. (49) China Asia Retrospective cohort study 15/37 1.00 65.5 ± 8.70 33, 63.5% >60 SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs-positive 5
Gao et al. (38) China Asia Case-control study 56/54 1.00 67.9 ± 5.2 46, 41.8% NA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pneumonia Infected by Novel Coronavirus issued by the National Health Commission of China 8
Wang et al. (47) US America Retrospective cohort study 9/49 0.28 67 ± 12.5 30, 52.0% NA SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs-positive 6
Khunti et al. (18) UK Europe Cohort study 1800005/2851465 1.00 67 (57–77) 1593730, 55.9% NA Deaths were defined as COVID-19 related if the ICD-10 codes U07.1 (COVID-19, virus identified) or U07.2 (COVID-19, virus not identified) were recorded. 9
Open in a new tab

M, metformin group; C, control group; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; SD, standard deviation; NA, not available.

Metformin Use and COVID-19 Mortality

The meta-analysis suggested that the use of metformin is associated with 34% lowered overall mortality (95% CI, 0.56–0.78; I2 = 67.9%) for COVID-19 patients (Figure 1). In sensitivity analysis by leaving the largest study out, the effect size shows robustness (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47–0.75; I2 = 69.7%) (Supplementary Figure 5). The subgroup analyses did not identify any credible subgroup effects (Figure 2). In addition, the influencing analysis by successively excluding one study at a time did not change the findings (Supplementary Figure 6). We did not identify significant publication bias. The funnel plot showed an approximate symmetric distribution, and the P-values for Egger's test and Begg's test were 0.879 and 0.270, respectively (Supplementary Figure 7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of studies assessing association between metformin use and mortality among COVID-19 patients. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Subgroup analysis of association between metformin use and risk of mortality among COVID-19 patients. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Metformin Use and Other COVID-19 Outcomes

To examine the association between metformin use and other outcomes, we conducted a further meta-analyses of two (33, 52), five (35, 38, 39, 41, 48, 49), and four (29–31, 47) studies estimating the association between metformin use and risk of intubation, deterioration, and hospitalization. The pooled ORs of metformin use with intubation, deterioration, and hospitalization were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77–1.16; I2 = 0.0%), 2.04 (95% CI, 0.65–6.34; I2 = 79.4%), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53–1.00; I2 = 16.8%), respectively (Supplementary Figures 2–4).

In addition, it was also reported that metformin use was associated with an 82% decreased risk of ARDS (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05–0.62) (40), a 2.73-fold increased risk of acidosis (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.04–7.13), and 41% decreased risk of heart failure (HR, 0.59, 95%, 0.41–0.83) (34). However, Cheng et al. did not find a significant association between metformin consumption and the risk of incident ARDS with a larger sample size (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61–1.17) (34).

The associations between metformin use and acute kidney injury, acute heart injury, and incident disseminated intravascular coagulation were also examined in this same study; however, the results were still showed no statistical significance. Moreover, metformin use did not affect the risk of in-hospital complications (46). No positive associations between metformin use and the length of ICU and hospital stays were observed in populations in Iraq with COVID-19 (26). Choi et al. reported that metformin use was associated with progression-free survival with an HR of 6.196 (95% CI, 2.58–14.91) among the Korean COVID-19 population, based on a retrospective cohort study (35), while another Korean retrospective study did not find a significant association between metformin use and COVID-19 survival (37).

Discussion

Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed a strong association between metformin usage and reduced risk of death and hospitalization among COVID-19 patients with diabetes. This is the largest systematic review and meta-analysis on the protective effects of metformin in patients with COVID-19. Different sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.

Metformin has been used in people with type 2 diabetes for more than half a century, proving its safety. Metformin is free of severe adverse events except for a low incidence of hyperlactacidemia in patients with advanced kidney diseases (52). Gastrointestinal adverse events are the most short-term concern for metformin affecting approximately 10% of its users (50, 53). Vitamin B12 deficiency is a potential long-term risk in metformin users, but its clinical relevance has not yet been proven (54, 55). People may choose once-daily long-acting metformin instead of metformin immediate release if they are hesitating in taking drug more than once per day (56). Reducing over 1/3 death with benefits for other health events found in the current study, the tradeoff of metformin for people with COVID-19 is clear.

Our study is in line with a recent meta-analysis including nine observational studies with 10,233 people (19), but included more people and provided information of additional outcomes. A letter to the editor also supported our findings, which reported a significant decrease in mortality with preadmission metformin use in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes (pooled OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43–0.89) (20).

Mechanisms underlying the association between metformin and death and other adverse outcomes remain unclear. Recent studies demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming (57). The expression and stability of ACE2 is mediated by AMPK (58), which is considered as the key molecular target of metformin (59). The immunological response induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection mobilizes cytokines, mainly proinflammatory cytokines, and links to the prognosis of COVID-19 (60). Metformin reduces TNF-α to some extent in both human and animal studies (61, 62). TNF-α inhibitors are also reported to be associated with a decrease in mortality despite significant findings in a limited model (24). Thus, this pathway might partly explain the association between metformin use and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

There are some limitations that need to be noted when interpreting the results in the practice. First, the dose of metformin, strain of the virus, and the duration of metformin consumption may contribute to the heterogeneity but unavailable to be studied in this study-level analysis. Individual-level data may help explore the factors that contributes to the protective effects of metformin. Second, we did not identify any randomized trials in the systematic review and we are unable to conclude any causation of the results. The effect of metformin needs to be validated through randomized trials. Last, our study identified clear knowledge gap for outcomes of intubation and disease deterioration when current evidences are unable to support clinical interpretation. We call for further studies and analyses investigating metformin use and these two patient-important outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, metformin use was associated with reduced mortality and hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. The findings of our study indicated a relative benefit of metformin use in both nursing home residents and hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the association between metformin use and outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

YL, ZZ, and SL: conception or design. YL, XY, PY, and TS: acquisition, analysis, or interpretation. YL, XY, PY, TS, ZZ, and SL: drafting the work or revision and final approval of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

Funding. This study was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Support Project; Optimization Models and Policies Research On Evaluation Of Scientific Research For Clinical Specialties In Research-Oriented Hospitals In China - Taking Hospital H As an Example (2021JDR0283); and 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant numbers ZYGD18022 and 2020HXF011). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.704666/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (589.3KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. Available online at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1? (accessed April 10, 2021).
  • 2.Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Y, Liang W-H, Ou C-Q, He J-X, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1708–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu J, Zhong Z, Ji P, Li H, Li B, Pang J, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of 8697 patients with COVID-19 in China: a meta-analysis. Fam Med Community Health. (2020) 8:e000406. 10.1136/fmch-2020-000406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kichloo A, Albosta M, Dettloff K, Wani F, El-Amir Z, Singh J, et al. Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Fam Med Community Health. (2020) 8:e000530. 10.1136/fmch-2020-000530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li S, Zong Z, Sun Li XW. New evidence-based clinical practice guideline timely supports hospital infection control of coronavirus disease 2019. Precis Clin Med. (2020) 3:1–2. 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, Huang Z, Zhang D, Deng Q, et al. Prevalence ethnic pattern of diabetes prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. (2017) 317:2515–23. 10.1001/jama.2017.7596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Global Burden of Disease Cancer C Fitzmaurice C Abate D Abbasi N Abbastabar H Abd-Allah F . Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. (2019) 5:1749–68. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Li N, Wang M, et al. Population diversity of cardiovascular outcome trials and real-world patients with diabetes in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Chin Med J. (2021) 134:1317–23. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, Guthrie B, Wang HHX, Mercer SW, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study. Lancet Global Health. (2020) 8:e1003–17. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30264-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li S, Nemeth I, Donnelly L, Hapca S, Zhou, Pearson KER. Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with cardiovascular disease and microvascular complications in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2020) 43:426. 10.2337/dc19-0823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, Raverdy V, Noulette J, Duhamel A, et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity. (2020) 28:1195–9. 10.1002/oby.22831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang I, Lim, Pranata MAR. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia - a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab Syndr. (2020) 14:395–403. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Palmer S, Tendal B, Mustafa R, Vandvik P, Li S, Hao Q, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. (2021) 372:m4573. 10.1136/bmj.m4573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Garber A, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson M, Barzilay J, et al. Consensus statement by the American association of clinical endocrinologists and American college of endocrinology on the comprehensive ttype 2 diabetes management algorithm – 2020 executive summary. Endocr Pract. (2020) 26:107–39. 10.4158/cs-2019-0472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buse J, Wexler D, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. a consensus report by the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. (2020) 43: 487–93. 10.2337/dci19-0066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Griffin SJ, Leaver JK, Irving GJ. Impact of metformin on cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. (2017) 60:1620–9. 10.1007/s00125-017-4337-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Petrie JR, Rossing PR, Campbell IW. Metformin, and cardiorenal outcomes in diabetes: a reappraisal. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2020) 22:904–15. 10.1111/dom.13984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khunti K, Knighton P, Zaccardi F, Bakhai C, Barron E, Holman N, et al. Prescription of glucose-lowering therapies and risk of COVID-19 mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide observational study in England. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2021) 9:293–303. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00050-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lukito AA, Pranata R, Henrina J, Lim MA, Lawrensia S, Suastika K. The effect of metformin consumption on mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. (2020) 14:2177–83. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kow CS, Hasan SS. Mortality risk with preadmission metformin use in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:695–7. 10.1002/jmv.26498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stang A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang X, Tao S, Peng J, Zhao J, Li S, Wu N, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and risk of type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study and updated meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2021). 10.1002/dmrr.3446. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bramante CT, Ingraham NE, Murray TA, Marmor S, Hovertsen S, Gronski J, et al. Metformin and risk of mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. (2021) 2:e34–41. 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30033-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lally MA, Tsoukas P, Halladay CW, O'Neill E, Gravenstein S, Rudolph JL. Metformin is associated with decreased 30-day mortality among nursing home residents infected with SARS-CoV2. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2021) 22:193–8. 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nafakhi H, Alareedh M, Al-Buthabhak K, Shaghee F, Nafakhi A, Kasim S. Predictors of adverse in-hospital outcome and recovery in patients with diabetes mellitus and COVID-19 pneumonia in Iraq. Diabetes Metab Syndr. (2021) 15:33–8. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Orioli L, Servais T, Belkhir L, Laterre PF, Thissen JP, Vandeleene B, et al. Clinical characteristics and short-term prognosis of in-patients with diabetes and COVID-19: a retrospective study from an academic center in Belgium. Diabetes Metab Syndr. (2021) 15:149–57. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang J, Cooper JM, Gokhale K, Acosta-Mena D, Dhalla S, Byne N, et al. Association of metformin with susceptibility to COVID-19 in people with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2021) 106:dgab067. 10.1210/clinem/dgab067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Al Hayek AA, Robert AA, Bin Matar A, Algarni A, Alkubedan H, Alharbi T, et al. Risk factors for hospital admission among COVID-19 patients with diabetes a study from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. (2020) 41:1090–7. 10.15537/smj.2020.10.25419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bramante C, Tignanelli CJ, Dutta N, Jones E, Tamariz L, Clark JM, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and risk of hospitalization for COVID-19. medRxiv [Preprint]. (2020). 10.1101/2020.09.01.20185850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bramante CT, Buse J, Tamaritz L, Palacio A, Cohen K, Vojta D, et al. Outpatient metformin use is associated with reduced severity of COVID-19 disease in adults with overweight or obesity. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:4273–9. 10.1002/jmv.26873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bramante CT, Ingraham NE, Murray TA, Marmor S, Hovertsen S, Gronski J, et al. Observational study of metformin and risk of mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. medRxiv [Preprint]. (2020). 10.1101/2020.06.19.20135095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cariou B, Hadjadj S, Wargny M, Pichelin M, Al-Salameh A, Allix I, et al. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study. Diabetologia. (2020) 63:1500–15. 10.1007/s00125-020-05180-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng X, Liu YM, Zhang X, Lei F, Qin JJ, Chen Z, et al. Metformin is associated with higher incidence of acidosis, but not mortality, in individuals with COVID-19 and pre-existing type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. (2020) 32:537–7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Choi MH, Ahn H, Ryu HS, Kim BJ, Jang J, Jung M, et al. Clinical characteristics and disease progression in early-stage COVID-19 patients in South Korea. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:1–19. 10.3390/jcm9061959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Crouse AB, Grimes T, Li P, Might M, Ovalle F, Shalev A. Metformin use is associated with reduced mortality in a diverse population with COVID-19 and diabetes. Front Endocrinol. (2020) 11:600439. 10.3389/fendo.2020.600439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Do JY, Kim SW, Park JW, Cho KH, Kang SH. Is there an association between metformin use and clinical outcomes in diabetes patients with COVID-19? Diabetes Metab. (2020). 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.10.006. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao Y, Liu T, Zhong W, Liu R, Zhou H, Huang W, et al. Risk of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes with COVID-19: a preliminary retrospective report. Clin Transl Sci. (2020) 13:1055–9. 10.1111/cts.12897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Izzi-Engbeaya C, Distaso W, Amin A, Yang W, Idowu O, Kenkre JS, et al. Adverse outcomes in COVID-19 and diabetes: a retrospective cohort study from three London teaching hospitals. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. (2021) 9:e001858. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jiang N, Chen Z, Yin X, Liu L, Yang H, Tan X, et al. Association of metformin with mortality or ARDS in patients with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2021) 173:108619. 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim MK, Jeon JH, Moon JS, Cho NH, Han E, You JH, et al. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 infection and diabetes in daegu, South Korea. Diabetes Metab J. (2020) 44:602–13. 10.4093/dmj.2020.0146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li J, Wei Q, Li WX, McCowen KC, Xiong W, Liu J, et al. Metformin use in diabetes prior to hospitalization: effects on mortality in COVID-19. Endocr Pract. (2020) 26:1166–72. 10.4158/EP-2020-0466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu Z, Bai X, Han X, Jiang W, Qiu L, Chen S, et al. The association of diabetes and the prognosis of COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2020) 169:108386. 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Luo P, Qiu L, Liu Y, Liu XL, Zheng JL, Xue HY, et al. Metformin treatment was associated with decreased mortality in COVID-19 patients with diabetes in a retrospective analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2020) 103:69–72. 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mirsoleymani S, Nekooghadam SM, Marzaleh MA, Peyravi M, Soltani A, Sharififar S, et al. Assessment of risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 among Iranian patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. (2020) 22:e72. 10.32592/ircmj.2020.22.9.72 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Perez-Belmonte LM, Torres-Pena JD, Lopez-Carmona MD, Ayala-Gutierrez MM, Fuentes-Jimenez F, Huerta LJ, et al. Mortality and other adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted for COVID-19 in association with glucose-lowering drugs: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Med. (2020) 18:359. 10.1186/s12916-020-01832-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang B, Van Oekelen O, Mouhieddine TH, Del Valle DM, Richter J, Cho HJ, et al. A tertiary center experience of multiple myeloma patients with COVID-19: lessons learned and the path forward. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:94. 10.1186/s13045-020-00934-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yitao Z, Mu C, Ling Z, Shiyao C, Jiaojie X, Zhichong C, et al. Predictors of clinical deterioration in non-severe patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin. (2021) 37:1–14. 10.1080/03007995.2021.1876005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang N, Wang C, Zhu F, Mao H, Bai P, Chen LL, et al. Risk factors for poor outcomes of diabetes patients with COVID-19: a single-center, retrospective study in early outbreak in China. Front Endocrinol. (2020) 11:571037. 10.3389/fendo.2020.571037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bonnet F, Scheen A. Understanding, and overcoming metformin gastrointestinal intolerance. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2017) 19:473–81. 10.1111/dom.12854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lalau JD, Al-Salameh A, Hadjadj S, Goronflot T, Wiernsperger N, Pichelin M, et al. Metformin use is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19. Diabetes Metab. (2020) 19:101216. 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.101216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lalau JD, Kajbaf F, Protti A, Christensen MM, De Broe ME, et al. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): moving towards a new paradigm. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2017) 19:1502–12. 10.1111/dom.12974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McCreight LJ, Bailey CJ, Pearson ER. Metformin, and the gastrointestinal tract. Diabetologia. (2016) 59:426–35. 10.1007/s00125-015-3844-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu Q, Li S, Quan H, Li J. Vitamin B12 status in metformin treated patients: systematic review. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e100379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0100379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang Q, Li S, Li L, Li Q, Ren K, Sun X, et al. Metformin treatment and homocysteine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. (2016) 8:798. 10.3390/nu8120798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tan J, Wang Y, Liu S, Shi Q, Zhou X, Zhou Y, et al. Long-acting metformin vs. Metformin immediate release in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:669814. 10.3389/fphar.2021.669814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. (2020) 181:271–80.e8. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang J, Dong J, Martin M, He M, Gongol B, Marin TL, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in endothelium mitigates pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2018) 198:509–20. 10.1164/rccm.201712-2570OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ursini F, Ciaffi J, Landini MP, Meliconi R. COVID-19, and diabetes: Is metformin a friend or foe? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2020) 164:108167. 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Costela-Ruiz VJ, Illescas-Montes R, Puerta-Puerta JM, Ruiz C, Melguizo-Rodríguez L. SARS-CoV-2 infection: the role of cytokines in COVID-19 disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2020) 54:62–75. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Matsiukevich D, Piraino G, Lahni P, Hake PW, Wolfe V, O'Connor M, et al. Metformin ameliorates gender-and age-dependent hemodynamic instability and myocardial injury in murine hemorrhagic shock. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2017) 1863:2680–91. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.05.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Park JW, Lee JH, Park YH, Park SJ, Cheon JH, Kim WH, et al. Sex-dependent difference in the effect of metformin on colorectal cancer-specific mortality of diabetic colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol. (2017) 23:5196–205. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (589.3KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES