Abstract
Purpose
Erratic oocyte-activation affects fertilization and embryo development. Dehydro-epiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) is present in theca/cumulus-granulosa cells, regulates the same calcium-pumps that cause calcium-oscillations in mice and its levels are altered in women with no or low fertilization rates. Yet no study has explored correlation of DHEAS with oocyte-activation. We proposed to implicate DHEAS as an oocyte-related factor in oocyte-activation by demonstrating that rectification of deviated (both lower/and higher than normal) DHEAS concentrations to normal post-treatment improves fertilization, embryo development rates.
Method
Prospective Closed-Cohort. Recruited n = 750 (150 women/subgroup) in previously classified Low(A), Average/Control(B), High(C) D3-serum DHEAS groups. 50% women in both A and C groups received 3-months exposure to oral DHEAS and Metformin respectively. Also measured Follicular-fluid DHEAS levels. Compared embryologic, clinical outcomes: DHEAS untreated (A1) vs. treated (A2); metformin untreated (C1) vs. treated (C2) and A1/A2/C1/C2 against normal-control-B group. Also compared serum vs. FF-group results.
Results
Significantly improved embryologic, clinical parameters in treated A2/C2 compared to untreated A1/C1 subgroups respectively. Post-treated improved parameters in A2/C2 were comparable with, whereas untreated A1/C1 sub-groups had significantly lower values than, normal-control B-group. Parameters differed significantly between Low, Medium, High FF-DHEAS groups. Results in serum vs. FF: A1 vs. LowFF, C1 vs. HighFF and A2/C2/B vs. MediumFF were comparable. Odds of fertilization, live-births increased in post-treatment A2/C2 subgroups. Fertilization rates strongly correlated with FF-DHEAS.
Conclusion
Rectification of deviated DHEAS levels post-treatment significantly improves outcomes, comparable with those exhibited by normal-control DHEAS thresholds. DHEAS is the most promising endogenous oocyte-related factor influencing embryologic, clinical IVF outcomes possibly by affecting oocyte-activation.
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s10815-021-02215-z
Correction to: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2021) 38:193–202.
10.1007/s10815-020-02001-3
The abstract in original article unfortunately was not included.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s10815-020-02001-3
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Bindu N. Chimote, Email: bindunm10@yahoo.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-9360
Natachandra M. Chimote, Email: nmchimote@yahoo.co.in