Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2020 Sep 29;92(20):13641–13646. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02979

Enhanced Hemocompatibility and In Vivo Analytical Accuracy of Intravascular Potentiometric Carbon Dioxide Sensors via Nitric Oxide (NO) Release

Qi Zhang a, Griffin P Murray a, Joseph E Hill b, Stephen L Harvey b, Alvaro Rojas-Pena b,c, Jonathan Choi a, Yang Zhou d, Robert H Bartlett b, Mark E Meyerhoff a,*
PMCID: PMC8417821  NIHMSID: NIHMS1734689  PMID: 32955253

Abstract

In this report, the innate ability of nitric oxide (NO) to inhibit platelet activation/adhesion/thrombus formation is employed to improve the hemocompatibility and in vivo accuracy of an intravascular potentiometric PCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide) sensor. The catheter-type sensor is fabricated by impregnating a segment of dual lumen silicone tubing with a proton ionophore, plasticizer and lipophilic cation-exchanger. Subsequent filling of bicarbonate and strong buffer solutions, and placement of Ag/AgCl reference electrode wires within each lumen, respectively, enables measurement of the membrane potential difference across the inner wall of the tube, with this potential changing as a function of the logarithm of sample PCO2. The dual lumen device is further encapsulated within a S-nitroso-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine (SNAP)-doped silicone tube that releases physiological levels of NO. The NO releasing sensor exhibits near-Nernstian sensitivity towards PCO2 (slope = 59.31 ± 0.78 mV/decade) and low drift rates (< 2 mV/24h after initial equilibration). In vivo evaluation of the NO releasing sensors performed in the arteries and veins of anesthetized pigs for 20 h shows enhanced accuracy (vs. non-NO release sensors) when benchmarked to measurements of discrete blood samples made with a commercial blood gas analyzer. The accurate, continuous monitoring of blood PCO2 levels achieved with this new IV NO releasing PCO2 sensor configuration could help better manage hospitalized patients in critical care units.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1734689-f0001.jpg


Blood gas (PCO2, PO2 and pH) analyses are essential for assessing a patient’s physiological status, especially in intensive care units and operating rooms [1]. Real-time blood PCO2 monitoring is of particular interest, as hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis ensue from respiratory failure, which can be associated with severe conditions (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, central nervous system depression, neuromuscular disorders, thoracic deformities, etc.) that require immediate therapeutic intervention [2, 3]. However, the clinical standard of care at present employs a benchtop blood gas analyzer to test arterial blood samples intermittently collected from patients, which may cause delayed diagnosis/therapeutics. Non-invasive, continuous end-tidal and transcutaneous approaches to PCO2 measurements have been reported, but these approaches are error-prone [4, 5]. Hence, the availability of intravascular (IV) PCO2 sensors that enable continuous real-time monitoring of PCO2 with good accuracy is highly desirable.

Multi-probe IV blood gas monitoring systems with built-in fiberoptic PCO2 sensors are used clinically but these are primarily employed only to monitor PCO2 during extracorporeal procedures (e.g. open heart surgery), and they suffer from accuracy problems due to limitations (e.g., sensitivity to ionic strength, photo-bleaching and leaching of immobilized dyes, etc.) and geometrical obstacles (e.g., wall effect) [68]. Electrochemical systems, although offering immunity to many of the specific problems of their optical counterparts, have not attracted much attention to date for IV applications. Indeed, conventional Severinghaus-type glass pH sensor-based PCO2 electrodes are too rigid/fragile to be incorporated into catheter structures for practical in vivo use [9, 10].

To tackle these issues, our group previously reported a catheter-type potentiometric PCO2 sensor based on a simple concentric dual-lumen silicone tubing configuration, employing the inner wall doped with a proton ionophore tridodecylamine, a sodium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaTFPB) cation-exchanger and nitrophenyloctylether (NPOE) plasticizer, as the H+-sensitive membrane [11, 12]. When one lumen is filled with NaHCO3 solution and the other with a strong buffer, the voltage across the inner wall between the two lumens changes in proportion to the log PCO2 due to a pH decrease in the lumen filled with the bicarbonate solution. These IV PCO2 probes produced accurate results in a heparinized dog model for 7 h. However, long-term hemocompatibility without the need for systemic heparinization to prevent clotting on the sensing catheter’s outer surface remains a major challenge for IV sensors placed within blood vessels. Indeed, the host’s response in the form of thrombus formation on sensor surfaces [13, 14] can alter the local concentration of CO2 via cellular (e.g. platelet) metabolic activities and also limit analyte diffusion from the blood stream. Both processes can cause CO2 levels in the region surrounding the sensor to deviate from their bulk blood levels and thereby yielding erroneous analytical results [15, 16]. Indeed, most preclinical/clinical studies for continuous blood gas detection in vivo employ heparinized saline flush and/or heparin modification of the sensors, and typically span only a short time frame (a few hours) and often require recalibration [6, 17, 18].

Nitric oxide (NO), an endothelium-derived molecule with anti-platelet/thrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, has emerged as a promising solution to the problem of IV device biocompatibility. As demonstrated previously in multiple in vivo studies using animal models, physiological levels of NO emitted from amperometric IV glucose and PO2 sensors could successfully reduce clot formation and improve sensor accuracy for continuous IV blood monitoring [1924].

In this study we report, for the first time, the fabrication of a NO releasing catheter-type potentiometric PCO2 sensor (Figure 1). The NO release functionality is derived from the incorporation of the NO-donating molecule, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), into a silicone tube that the original dual lumen potentiometric CO2 sensor [11, 12] is inserted within. After initial benchtop studies, continuous in vivo blood PCO2 monitoring using a porcine model for 20 h was performed to evaluate the accuracy and hemocompatibility of the new NO releasing PCO2 sensor in comparison with a non-NO release control sensor (Figure S1(a) and (b)) tested in the same animals. It will be shown that the addition of the NO releasing silicone tube over the inner dual lumen PCO2 sensor significantly enhances the analytical performance of the IV implanted sensors.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Image (left) and cross-sectional schematic view (right) of a NO-releasing catheter-type potentiometric PCO2 sensor.

Unlike a glass pH sensitive membrane in the Severinghaus style PCO2 sensor, H+ sensitivity of the catheter-type sensor is derived from modifying a ca. 3 cm section of dual lumen silicone tube (5 cm) with an H+-sensing tridodecylamine ionophore, as well as NaTFPB as a lipophilic ion-exchanger and NPOE as a plasticizer to decrease resistance of the tube wall. The membrane potential difference across the H+-sensitive silicone inner wall between the lumens is related to the logarithm of sample PCO2 (log PCO2) (Figure S1(c)). In order not to disrupt the sensing chemistry within the wall between the lumens, the modified end of a 5 cm long H+-sensitive dual lumen tube was encapsulated in a NO releasing sheath consisting of a 2.2 cm length of a SNAP impregnated silicone tube that is sealed by a SNAP/silicone (35/65, w/w) mixture [25] on the tip (Figure 1). Due to SNAP crystal formation [26], SNAP doped silicone is expected to provide excellent long-term stability, and more importantly, sustainable physiological-levels of NO release [27] to potentially enhance hemocompatibility of the sensing section of the IV device when placed within blood vessels. The NO release rate from the SNAP in the wall of the outer tube via thermal decomposition was determined daily using a chemiluminescence nitric oxide analyzer (NOA) over an 8-day period (Figure S2). During this period, the NO flux was relatively stable and never fell below the lowest endothelial level (> 0.5 × 10−10 mol·cm−2·min−1) [16], a flux reported to endow implantable SNAP-modified devices with significant antithrombotic/anti-inflammatory functions [21, 2829]. NO release from the dome-shaped sensor tip (Figure S3) alone was examined, and was also > 0.5 × 10−10 mol·cm−2·min−1 for at least 96 h, which should be adequate to inhibit thrombosis specifically initiated at the sensor’s tip.

Fabricated under optimized conditions (see Supporting Information), both the NO releasing sensors and controls (without SNAP) (Figure S1) were tested for simultaneous potentiometric PCO2 response in a 25 mM NaHCO3/120 mM NaCl calibration solution saturated alternately by certified CO2 gases (±1% error) within a physiologically-relevant range of 5.0% to 15.0% (i.e. 38.0 – 114.0 mmHg) at 37°C. As illustrated in Figure S4, the sensors exhibit good reversibility and near-Nernstian sensitivity to PCO2, without any significant difference in the slopes between the NO releasing sensors (59.31 ± 0.78 mV/decade, n=3) and controls (59.25 ± 0.71 mV/decade, n=3). The response time of the dual-lumen silicone PCO2 sensor, defined here as the time to reach 90% of cell potential equilibration (t90) for a PCO2 step change from 38 to 76 mmHg, is ca. 4.8 min for control sensors, faster than ca. 6.1 min for the NO releasing sensors. This disparity is due to the hindrance of CO2 diffusion by the added outer tube that contains the SNAP crystals in the outer silicone sheath. Response times on the order of several minutes are still clinically useful for continuous monitoring, especially when compared to ex vivo tests with a blood gas analyzer. Much faster response times could be achieved by reducing the diameter and wall thicknesses of the inner PCO2 sensing dual lumen tube [11], while optimizing the size of outer SNAP doped tube for balanced rapidity in response time and NO flux.

The new dual lumen catheter PCO2 sensors exhibit initial potential drifts when equilibrated in NaHCO3 calibration solution of 5.0% CO2 at 37°C. While the drifts of control sensor go through a relatively long equilibration phase (about 16 h) until a plateau is reached, similar to our previous report [11], the NO releasing sensors have very minor initial drifts that are completed within 8 h (Figure S5). Only negligible drifts/fluctuates were observed subsequently (< 2 mV/24 h) for both types of sensors. It is possible that osmotic process, caused by the osmotic pressure differences, is less significant in the NO releasing sensors due to the obstruction of water diffusion through silicone rubber by SNAP within the encapsulating tube [3032]. The sensitivity for both controls and NO releasing sensors typically doe not decrease by any significant degree over the first 48 h, which is adequate for the time-frame (20 h after equilibration) of the in vivo animal studies conducted in this study (Figure S5 (a) and (b)). It is also noteworthy that the endothelial-level of NO release exhibited by the sensors does not systematically cause significant fluctuation of potentiometric signal or affect the long-term sensitivity of the underlying PCO2 sensor over 96 h (Figure S5 (b)).

To evaluate the in vivo accuracy of the new NO releasing PCO2 probe for continuous IV monitoring, three pairs of NO releasing and control sensors were tested in the jugular veins and femoral arteries/veins on both sides of each pig (n=3 pigs in total), with the distal section of ca. 2.2 cm in length placed within the blood vessels. The sensors were pre-conditioned and pre-calibrated in CO2 tonometered NaHCO3/NaCl solutions before implantation. The raw EMF potentiometric signal (mV) was converted into PCO2 values (mmHg) using one-point calibration (see Supporting Information for details). Figure 2(a) illustrates continuous PCO2 readings for a representative pair of NO and control sensors implanted in the femoral arteries of the same animal over a 20-h in vivo experiment, compared to values reported by a reference blood gas analyzer on discrete blood samples periodically drawn from the animals. The signal from the control sensors (blue line) started to deviate positively as early as the first 4 h of the experiment. Such a permanent upward shift is attributed to thrombus formation around the catheter surface (Figure 2(b)). Indeed, excess CO2 generated by metabolic activity of platelets/cells within the surface clot layer creates a local environment with an elevated CO2 level, driving monitored PCO2 values falsely higher than the true values in the bulk blood [15, 16]. The decreased sensitivity and response time towards CO2 challenges for the control sensors, as manifested by blunt peaks in Figure 2(a), results from hampered gas diffusion due to the isolation of sensor by the blood clots. Such an overall loss of accuracy for control sensors highlights the biocompatibility issue for IV PCO2 sensors. In contrast, more rapid and accurate tracking of PCO2 changes is observed for the NO releasing sensors (Figure 2(a), green line). Despite the dramatic changes in PCO2 upon the manipulation of ventilation for a total of five CO2 challenges, continuously monitored PCO2 values always correlate well with discrete in vitro blood gas analyzer values throughout the 20 h, showing the robustness of NO-releasing sensors for PCO2 measurements over an extended implantation period without the need for recalibration. The images of the NO releasing sensor after being explanted at the end of the run suggests minimal clot formation (Figure 2(b)), which agrees well with the excellent in vivo accuracy. Depending on different physiological status of the pigs (e.g. coagulation time, blood pressure, blood vessel size, etc.), controls could also accumulate minor clots of low surface coverage (Figure S6(b)) that cause a smaller baseline shift without serious sensitivity loss (Figure S6(a)). Indeed, individual sensors with high levels of deviation generally show significant clotting. Throughout all animal studies, no interference was observed by anesthetic gases and medicines (e.g., isoflurane and vecuronium bromide) introduced.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Example of response curves for a NO releasing sensor (green) and a control sensor (blue) for PCO2 monitoring in pig femoral arteries compared to corresponding discrete blood gas analyzer values (red dots) over a 20-h animal study and (b) Images of NO releasing and control sensors explanted from pig femoral arteries after 20 h.

The numerical accuracy of 3× pairs of intra-arterial PaCO2 sensors and 5× pairs of intravenous PvCO2 sensors in three animal studies (after excluding 1× pair of femoral venous sensors that were accidentally misplaced) was evaluated separately by quantitating the mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) between in vivo values measured and in vitro blood sample values at the same time points. Each MARD value was calculated using data points for each type of sensor at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 240 min for each 4 h test period (each CO2 challenge) during the overall 20-h study. As illustrated in Figures 3(a) and (b), deviation generally increases over time for IV sensors due to clot formation. While control sensors in both arteries and veins exhibited a notable positive MARD (up to 20–30% at the 20-h mark), the corresponding NO-emitting sensors only exhibited an ca. 10% deviation from the reference values over the entire 20 h test period (p < 0.05 at each time point, n=18 for each type of PaCO2 sensors and n=30 for PvCO2 sensors in most cases). In fact, the MARD values for control sensors (especially severely clotted/impaired controls) can be understated here, as a positive PCO2 deviation due to CO2 produced by clots might be canceled out by diminished magnitude of the response to the CO2 challenges because of slowed CO2 diffusion, and this would reduce the overall MARD for controls. This phenomenon is different for IV PO2 sensors, for which the consumption of surrounding O2 and declined sensitivity collectively lead to a larger deviation over time [20, 21]. Average clotted area on explanted PCO2 sensing catheters after 20 h shows close correlation with the MARD, as NO releasing sensors have considerably less clots on their surfaces than controls (Figure 3(c)). Clot reduction is particularly effective for NO releasing PaCO2 sensors, probably due to a much higher blood flow in arteries. The remaining yet insignificant MARD and clotting for NO release sensors (especially those for PvCO2) did not result from significantly decreasing NO release, as the NO flux of SNAP-modified sensors before and after the 20-h animal studies remain relatively constant (Figure S7). After all, only moderate decrease in NO flux should be expected in SNAP-modified devices after initial burst on the first day [24, 27]. However, events such as hypercoagulation in individual pigs and exceedingly fast changing of the blood CO2 levels during these challenges did cause discrepancy in reported values for controls as well as the NO releasing sensors. The partial obstruction of blood flow expected from the current sensors with an outer diameter of 2 mm, despite NO release, could have also increased the likelihood of thrombogenicity and thus loss in sensor accuracy, as the sensors typically exhibit less clotting in blood vessels of higher flow rates and larger size.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mean average relative deviation (MARD) of PCO2 values monitored by (a) NO releasing and control PCO2 sensors in pig arteries (n=3), and (b) NO releasing and control PCO2 sensors in pig veins (n=5) from the values measured by blood gas analyzer reference method at 4 h intervals over the 20-h animal studies, and (c) average clotted area on explanted NO releasing sensors vs control sensors from both arteries (left, n=3) and veins (right, n=5) after 20 h.

Clinical accuracy of the intravascular sensors was evaluated with error grids (Figure 4). On the basis of the periodic in vitro blood gas tests as the reference, 93.3% of the measurements from NO releasing PaCO2 sensors (n = 89) were within ±20% error (known as the clinically accurate zone), while only 66.3% of the measurements from control PaCO2 sensors were within ±20% error. Similarly, the results of NO releasing and control PvCO2 sensors (n = 142) are 89.4% and 62.0%, showing a 27.4% suppression of accuracy for the intravenous controls. Based on linear regression (all p-values < 0.001), NO releasing sensors also exhibit substantially better correlation of R2 = 0.864 (PaCO2) and 0.742 (PvCO2) with the blood gas analyzer reference method, than controls with R2 of 0.177 (PaCO2) and 0.382 (PvCO2). Again, the generally superior results for PaCO2 measurements than PvCO2 with NO release is due to more effective clot reduction by NO release in arteries which normally exhibit much higher blood flow rates (Figure 3(c)). The overall relative deviations as calculated are −1.09% ± 11.52% (PaCO2) and 3.94% ± 13.93% (PvCO2) for NO releasing sensors, in sharp contrast to 10.07% ± 35.95% (PaCO2) and 14.43% ± 26.41% (PvCO2) for controls. Similarly, Bland-Altman plots also suggest the same trend as illustrated by much wider 95% limits of agreement for the control sensors (Figure S8). The above data further substantiate our hypothesis that thrombus formation and concomitant entrapped metabolically active cells on the control sensors can lead to considerable loss of their accuracy.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Comparison of PCO2 values measured by (a) NO releasing PaCO2 sensors and PvCO2 sensors and (b) control PaCO2 sensors and PvCO2 sensors against the values by a blood gas analyzer throughout the 20-h animal studies. Dashed lines and the solid line indicate 0% error and ±20% error.

Overall, the demonstrated improvement of PCO2 analytical accuracy using NO release CO2 sensing catheters during the proof-of-concept 20-h animal studies reported herein, provides the basis for a pathway toward creating continuous IV PCO2 monitoring sensors for use in critically ill patients. The PCO2 sensor delivered a strong performance (e.g., NO flux, in vivo accuracy and hemocompatibility, etc.) that is comparable to that of the best NO-releasing intravascular PO2/glucose/lactate sensors we have previously reported [1924].

The sensors are immediately applicable for ex vivo clinical procedures (e.g. extracorporeal circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass), where patients are systemically heparinized. But more importantly, with further miniaturization of the sensor configuration described herein, such PCO2 sensors could be employed for continuous longer-term intra-arterial applications in critically ill patients. Other optimization strategies such as selecting more effective NO donors, and further combining NO release with surface immobilization of CD47 peptide [33] or anticoagulant [34], are also underway in our group for longer-term animal as well as potential clinical studies. Future designs may include a thermocouple for temperature correction. A pH sensing electrode will also be incorporated into the PCO2 sensor, similar to our previous design [11, 12], for synergistically assessing acid/base homeostasis and the better management of a wide spectrum of medical conditions [35].

Supplementary Material

SI file

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant (NIH-EB-023294)

Footnotes

All authors declare no competing financial interests.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Severinghaus JW; Astrup P; Murray JF Blood Gas Analysis and Critical Care Medicine. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med 1998, 157, S114–S122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Huttmann SE; Windisch W; Storre JH Techniques for the Measurement and Monitoring of Carbon Dioxide in the Blood, Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc 2014, 11(4), 645–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Roussos C; Koutsoukou A Respiratory Failure. Eur. Respir. J 2003, 22, 3s–14s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Mari A; Nougue H; Mateo J; Vallet B; Vallée F Transcutaneous PCO2 Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: Update and Perspectives. J. Thorac Dis 2019, Suppl 11, S1558–S1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Proulx J Respiratory Monitoring: Arterial Blood Gas Analysis, Pulse Oximetry, and End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Analysis. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract 1999, 14(4), 227–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Ganter. M; Zollinger A Continuous Intravascular Blood Gas Monitoring: Development, Current Techniques, and Clinical Use of a Commercial Device. Br. J. Anaesth 2003, 91(3), 397–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Venkatesh B Continuous Intra-Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring. Crit Care Resusc. 1999, 1, 140–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Meyerhoff ME In Vivo Blood-Gas and Electrolyte Sensors: Progress and Challenges. Trends Anal. Chem 1993, 12(6), 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Neumark J; Bardeen A; Sulzer E; Kampine JP Miniature Intravascular pCO2 Sensors in Neurosurgery. J. Neurosurg 1975, 43, 172–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Venkatesh B; Hendry SP Continuous Intra-Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring. Intensive Care Med 1996, 22, 818–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Telting-Diaz M; Collison ME; Meyerhoff ME Simplified Dual-Lumen Catheter Design for Simultaneous Potentiometric Monitoring of Carbon Dioxide and pH. Anal. Chem 1994, 66, 576–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Meruva RK; Meyerhoff ME Catheter-Type Sensor for Potentiometric Monitoring of Oxygen, pH and Carbon Dioxide, Bisens. Bioelectron 1998, 13(2), 201–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Ishikawa S; Makita K; Nakazawa K; Amaha K Continuous Intra-Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring during Oesophagectomy, Can. J. Anaesth 1998, 45, 273–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Weiss IK; Fink S; Harrison R; Feldman JD; Brill JE Clinical Use of Continuous Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Pediatrics 1999, 103, 440–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Frost M; Meyerhoff ME In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Tackling Biocompatibility. Anal. Chem 2006, 78(21), 7370–7377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Wu Y; Meyerhoff ME Nitric Oxide-Releasing/Generating Polymers for the Development of Implantable Chemical Sensors with Enhanced Biocompatibility. Talanta 2008, 75(3), 642–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Menzel M; Soukup J; Henze D; Engelbrecht K; Senderreck M; Scharf A; Rieger A; Grond S Experiences with Continuous Intra-Arterial Blood Gas Monitoring: Precision and Drift of a Pure Optode-System. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29, 2180–2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Zollinger A; Spahn DR; Singer T; Zalunardo MP; Stoehr S; Weder W; Pasch T Accuracy and Clinical Performance of a Continuous Intra-Arterial Blood-Gas Monitoring System during Thoracoscopic Surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1997, 79(1), 47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Schoenfisch MH, Mowery KA, Rader MV, Baliga N, Wahr JA, Meyerhoff ME Improving the Thromboresistivity of Chemical Sensors via Nitric Oxide Release: Fabrication and In Vivo Evaluation of NO-Releasing Oxygen-Sensing Catheters. Anal. Chem 2000, 72, 1119–1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Frost MC; Rudich SM; Zhang H; Maraschio MA; Meyerhoff ME In Vivo Biocompatibility and Analytical Performance of Intravascular Amperometric Oxygen Sensors Prepared with Improved Nitric Oxide-Releasing Silicone Rubber Coating. Anal. Chem, 2002, 74, 5942–5947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Yan Q; Major TC; Bartlett RH; Meyerhoff ME Intravascular Glucose/Lactate Sensors Prepared with Nitric Oxide Releasing Poly (lactide-co-glycolide)-Based Coatings for Enhanced Biocompatibility. Biosens. Bioelectron 2011, 26(11), 4276–4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Wolf AK; Qin Y; Major TC; Meyerhoff ME Improved Thromboresistance and Analytical Performance of Intravascular Amperometric Glucose Sensors Using Optimized Nitric Oxide Release Coatings. Chin. Chem. Lett 2015, 26(4), 464–468. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Ren H; Coughlin MA; Major TC; Aiello S; Rojas-Pena A; Bartlett RH; Meyerhoff ME Improved in Vivo Performance of Amperometric Oxygen (PO2) Sensing Catheters via Electrochemical Nitric Oxide Generation/Release. Anal. Chem 2015, 87, 8067–8072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).McCabe MM; Hala P; Rojas-Pena A; Lautner-Csorba O; Major TC; Ren H; Bartlett RH; Brisbois EJ; Meyerhoff ME Enhancing Analytical Accuracy of Intravascular Electrochemical Oxygen Sensors via Nitric Oxide Release Using S-Nitroso-N-AcetylPenicillamine (SNAP) Impregnated Catheter Tubing. Talanta 2019, 205, 120077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Lautner G; Stringer B; Brisbois EJ; Meyerhoff ME; Schwendeman SP Controlled Light-Induced Gas Phase Nitric Oxide Release from S-Nitrosothiol-Doped Silicone Rubber Films. Nitric Oxide 2019, 86, 31–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Wo Y; Li Z; Brisbois EJ; Colletta A; Wu J; Major TC; Xi C; Bartlett RH; Matzger AJ; Meyerhoff ME Origin of Long-Term Storage Stability and Nitric Oxide Release Behavior of Carbosil Polymer Doped with S-Nitroso-N-Acetyl-D-Penicillamine. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22218–22227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Colletta A; Wu J; Wo Y; Kappler M; Chen H; Xi C; Meyerhoff ME S-Nitroso-N-Acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) Impregnated Silicone Foley Catheters: A Potential Biomaterial/Device To Prevent Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng 2015, 1, 416–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Wang X; Jolliffe A; Carr B; Zhang Q; Bilger M; Cui Y; Wu J; Wang X; Mahoney M; Rojas-Pena A; Hoenerhoff MJ; Douglas J; Bartlett RH; Xi C; Bull JL; Meyerhoff ME Nitric Oxide-Releasing Semi-Crystalline Thermoplastic Polymers: Preparation, Characterization and Application to Devise AntiInflammatory and Bactericidal Implants. Biomater. Sci 2018, 6, 3189–3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Brisbois EJ; Kim M; Wang X; Mohammed A; Major TC; Wu J; Brownstein J; Xi C; Handa H; Bartlett RH; Meyerhoff ME Improved Hemocompatibility of Multilumen Catheters via Nitric Oxide (NO) Release from S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) Composite Filled Lumen. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29270–29279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Riggs PD; Parker S; Braden M; Kalachandra S Influence of Additives on the Water Uptake of Hydrosilanized Silicone Rubbers. Biomaterials 1997, 18, 721–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Watson JM; Baron MG The Behaviour of Water in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). J. Membr. Sci, 1996, 110, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Li Z; Li X; Petrovic S; Harrison DJ Dual-Sorption Model of Water Uptake in Poly(vinyl chloride)-Based Ion-Selective Membranes: Experimental Water Concentration and Transport Parameters. Anal. Chem, 1996, 68,1717–1725. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Zhang Q; Stachelek SJ; Inamdar VV; Alferiev I; Nagaswami C; Weisel JW; Hwang JH; Meyerhoff ME Studies of Combined NO-Eluting/CD47-Modified Polyurethane Surfaces for Synergistic Enhancement of Biocompatibility, Colloids Surf. B 2020, 192, 111060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Suchyta DJ; Handa H; Meyerhoff ME A Nitric Oxide-Releasing Heparin Conjugate for Delivery of a Combined Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Agent. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11(2), 645–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Hamm LL; Nakhoul N; Hering-Smith KS Acid-Base Homeostasis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol 2015, 10(12), 2232–2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI file

RESOURCES