Abstract
Inflammatory responses play a vital role in the onset and development of atherosclerosis, and throughout the entire process of the chronic disease. The inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis are mainly mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome and its downstream inflammatory factors. As a powerful anti‐inflammatory medicine, colchicine has a history of more than 200 years in clinical application and is the first‐choice treatment for immune diseases such as gout and familial Mediterranean fever. In atherosclerosis, colchicine can inhibit the assembly and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome via various mechanisms to effectively reduce the expression of inflammatory factors, thereby reducing the inflammation. Recent clinical trials show that a low dose of colchicine (0.5 mg per day) has a certain protective effect in stable angina patients or those with acute myocardial infarction after PCI. This article summarizes and discusses the mechanisms of colchicine in the treatment of atherosclerosis and the latest research progress.
Keywords: atherosclerosis, colchicine, NLRP3 inflammasome
1. INTRODUCTION
The onset and progress of atherosclerosis are closely related to aseptic inflammation. The inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis are mainly developed through the NLRP3 inflammasome, interleukin‐1 beta (IL‐1β) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) inflammatory response axis and eventually lead to an increase in the C‐reactive protein (CRP). Colchicine can block NLPR3 inflammasomes through a variety of ways, thereby inhibiting downstream pathways and reducing the inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis.1, 2, 3 Although lipid‐lowering therapy is still the cornerstone, anti‐inflammatory therapy is opening up new ways to treat atherosclerosis. According to a large number of clinical studies in recent years, colchicine, as an anti‐inflammatory drug, is increasingly present in cardiovascular disease treatment programmes.
2. INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES IN ATHEROSCLEROSIS
In the early 19th century, pathologists Rokitansky and Virchow put forward the view that atherosclerosis is closely related to inflammation.4 However, this view did not attract enough attention at the beginning of the 20th century. According to the traditional view, coronary atherosclerosis is caused by the continuous deposition of lipids under the endothelium of blood vesselsalone.5 Until the 1990s, as atherosclerosis research progressed, the role of inflammation in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis became more prominent.
2.1. Lipoproteins deposited subcutaneously in blood vessels activate inflammatory responses
There are many hypotheses about the mechanism of atherosclerosis, and one widely accepted among them is the endothelial injury theory. The hypothesis suggests that a disorder haemodynamics or hypoxia‐affected local vasculature could lead to vascular endothelial damage, and apolipoproteins carrying cholesterol can continuously deposit under vascular endothelium with blood circulation.6 The lipoproteins are very easily oxidized under the intima of blood vessels and mainly composed of oxidized low‐density lipoprotein (OxLDL) and cholesterol crystals.7 OxLDL can induce leukocyte recruitment and activation to promote inflammation. OxLDL could also activate macrophages through the CD36‐TLR4‐TLR6 complex to promote NLRP3 inflammasome‐related inflammatory responses.8 By activating the NLRP3 inflammasome in ApoE−/− mice, the increase in cholesterol crystals was positively correlated with the increase in macrophages. Furthermore, in the experiments on NLRP3−/−, ASC−/−, IL‐1α−/−and IL‐1β−/− transgenic mice, the author found that atherosclerotic plaques were significantly reduced, inflammation levels alleviated. Those could confirm that the atherosclerotic inflammatory response induced by cholesterol crystals was closely related to the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the level of interleukin‐18 (IL‐18) and IL‐1β could significantly decrease with the formation and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.9 In general, when the vascular endothelium is damaged, the deposition of lipoproteins under the vascular endothelium could induce inflammation subsequently in atherosclerotic plaques by inducing the NLRP3 inflammasome.
2.2. NLRP3 inflammasome, IL‐1 β, IL‐6, C‐reactive protein inflammatory response axis
In 2002, Fabio Martinon et al. first identified a caspase‐activating complex and named it the inflammasome.10 From then on, many kinds of inflammasome have been observed and reported. Different pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMP) and damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMP) can induce inflammatory response by activating different inflammasomes.11 the NLRP3 inflammasome is a very important member of the inflammasome family and plays a crucial role in atherosclerotic inflammation.
2.2.1. Expression of NLRP3 inflammasome
In general, NLRP3 inflammasomes are expressed in myeloid cells, such as monocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils.12 The expression of NLRP3 inflammasomes is activated by PAMP and DAMP. Rosenfeld ME and Campbell LA reported that infections of different pathogens, including bacteria and viruses, can promote and aggravate the inflammatory response by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome, thereby increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease.13 Both PAMP and DAMP activate the downstream NF‐κB signal transduction pathway through the pattern recognition receptor (PRR) to promote the NLRP3 inflammasome expression. In atherosclerosis, OxLDL can directly activate the downstream NF‐κB signal transduction pathway through DAMP to increase the NLRP3 inflammasome of the expression, ASC (apoptosis‐associated speck‐like protein containing a CARD), pro‐IL‐1 β and pro‐IL‐18 (Figure 1).
2.2.2. Assembly and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome
At present, it is believed that the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is extremely dependent on the intracellular K+ concentration: only when it is less than 70 mM can the NLRP3 inflammasome be assembled and activated. When P2X7 receptors are activated by extracellular ATP, they open K+ channels and a massive moment of K+ flows out. The decrease in intracellular K+ concentration provides a basic prerequisite for the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.14, 15 The proteins induced by NF‐κB signal transduction pathway, such as NLRP2 and ASC, could then assemble with pro‐caspase in the cytoplasm to form the NLRP3 inflammasome.16 Among them, the micro‐tubule plays a critical role in the assembly of NLRP3 and ASC.17 In addition, cholesterol crystals (CCs) deposited under the damaged endothelium can be swallowed into lysosomes in macrophages through endocytosis, while OxLDL can also be swallowed by macrophages through receptor‐mediated endocytosis. OxLDL can be converted into cholesterol crystals in the lysosome to form intracellular CCs. Either intracellular or extracellular CCs can result in lysosomal membrane instability and rupture.9 At this time, a large amount of cathepsin B in lysosomes will be released into the cytoplasm, thus inducing the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.16, 18 Other common upstream NLRP3 inflammasome activation mechanisms include mitochondrial damage, release of cardiolipin and mitochondrial DNA, and release of reactive oxygen species19, 20, 21 (Figure 1).
2.2.3. Activation of IL‐1 β, IL‐6 and C‐reactive protein
NLRP3 inflammasome activation will induce the splicing of pro‐caspase itself and activate caspase 1. Activated caspase 1 can cleave pro‐IL‐1β and pro‐IL‐18 to form mature forms of IL‐1 β and IL‐18, which can be secreted out of the cell.22 Extracellular IL‐1β and IL‐18 can trigger a cascade of inflammatory factors and amplify inflammation through self‐activation.23, 24 IL‐1β and IL‐18 are relatively upstream cytokines in the inflammatory pathway. They can stimulate the secretion of other cytokines, increase the recruitment of leukocytes and promote inflammation.25 On the other hand, IL‐1β and IL‐18 can stimulate a variety of cells such as macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells to produce large amounts of IL‐6.23, 24 Daniel J. T yrrell et al. believed that IL‐6 can accelerate the formation of atherosclerosis by aggravating mitochondrial dysfunction in vascular smooth muscle cells.26 A large amount of IL‐6 can enter the liver through blood circulation and stimulate hepatocytes to synthesize acute‐phase reactants, such as fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor. It can also induce the liver to synthesize a marker of inflammatory state: C‐reactive protein.27, 28 As early as 1997, Paul M. et al. used the detection of plasma C‐reactive protein levels to predict the risk of patients’ future myocardial infarction and stroke.29 It is currently believed that hsCRP level of greater than or equal to 2 mg/L can be considered as an inflammatory response (Figure 2).
3. ANTI‐INFLAMMATORY MECHANISMS OF COLCHICINE IN ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Colchicine, as a powerful anti‐inflammatory drug, has been used for rheumatic immune diseases for many years, as well as gout, familial Mediterranean fever and osteoarthritis. Compared with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, colchicine has a different anti‐inflammatory effect.
3.1. Inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis, adhesion and recruitment
In the early stage of inflammation, neutrophils, as the forerunner of immune responses, can be affected by chemokines and then reach the inflammatory site first through blood circulation, and adhere to vascular endothelial cells though E‐selectin and L‐selectin. Through deformation, neutrophils can go through the intercellular space to reach the site of inflammation. Phelps P et al. discovered that in vitro, 0.1 nM colchicine can inhibit the chemotaxis of neutrophils and inhibit the release of chemokine S100A8 and S100A9 in neutrophils.30 What's more, Cronstein B et al. found that colchicine can also inhibit neutrophil adhesion and recruitment by inhibiting microtubule synthesis and promoting microtubule depolymerization.31, 32 Colchicine at 300 nM can directly cause the exfoliation of the adhesion molecule L‐selectin on the surface of endothelial cells and hinder the recruitment of neutrophils.32 Colchicine can also inhibit the synthesis of superoxide in neutrophils by inhibiting microtubules, thus reducing inflammation.2, 33 In vitro 3 nM colchicine can change the distribution of E‐selectin on the surface of endothelial cells and inhibit the adhesion of neutrophils. It is because colchicine can inhibit the chemotaxis, adhesion and recruitment of neutrophils that its clinical dosage needs to be precise. A high dose will often cause myelosuppression and neutropenia, therefore resulting in infection.
3.2. Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL‐1 β release
Colchicine can inhibit not only neutrophils, but also NLRP3 inflammasome activation in many ways, thus exert a powerful anti‐inflammatory effect. Martinon F. et al. proved that colchicine can inhibit the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cultured monocytes.34 Current studies have shown that the mechanism of colchicine on the NLRP3 inflammasome can be summarized into the following three types.
3.2.1. Colchicine can restrict P2X7 receptor
Marques‐da‐Silva C et al. evaluated the function of heterologous P2X2 and P2X7 receptors after ATP treatment by electrophysiology and dye uptake, and verified it with colchicine in vitro. The results showed that colchicine could effectively inhibit the pore formation induced by P2X7.35, 36 As mentioned above, ATP can activate P2X7 receptors to open K+ channels and reduce intracellular K+ concentration, thus promoting the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. When P2X7 receptors are inhibited, K+ outflow is blocked and a high concentration of K+ prevents NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activation.
3.2.2. Colchicine can damp microtubule synthesis
By immunofluorescence staining and other methods, Takuma Misawa et al. have successfully demonstrated that the assembly of not only NLRP3 and ASC but also NLRP3 inflammasomes into NLRP3 inflammasome complexes requires the transport function of microtubules.17 Because colchicine can inhibit the synthesis of microtubules and promote the degradation of microtubules, it can effectively inhibit the assembly of NLRP3 inflammasome complexes, and ultimately effectively inhibit the inflammatory response.
3.2.3. Colchicine can effectively inhibit Caspase‐1
In the study of small intestinal injury induced by NSAID in mice, Otani K et al found that colchicine could effectively inhibit the expression of caspase‐1 and IL‐1 β, but there was no significant change in NLRP3 and pro‐IL‐1 β levels. Through the recovery experiment and NLRP3−/− transgenic mice, it was further demonstrated that colchicine can inhibit inflammation by suppressing the expression of caspase‐1.37 In addition, Robertson S et al. collected blood from patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with colchicine (n = 21), the non‐treated group (n = 9) and the healthy control group (n = 9). After isolation and purification of monocytes, the key marker of inflammasome and the levels of pro‐IL‐1β and pro‐caspase were analysed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results showed that colchicine could decrease the levels of monocyte IL‐1 β in ACS patients by reducing the levels of pro‐caspase‐1 and caspase‐1 proteins.38 Caspase‐1 also plays an important role in the NLRP3 inflammasome, IL‐1β, and IL‐6 inflammatory reaction axis. It can cleave pro‐IL‐1 β and pro‐IL‐18 into their active forms. When caspase‐1 is inhibited, the level of downstream activated IL‐1 β will naturally decrease.
4. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF COLCHICINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS
At present, lipid‐regulating therapy is still an unshakable cornerstone in the treatment of atherosclerosis. However, inflammation runs through the onset and development of atherosclerosis. Right now, anti‐inflammatory therapy is still under exploration and has not been formally put into clinical practice. Current studies have shown that colchicine, as an anti‐inflammatory drug, is likely to become a first‐line treatment for atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular inflammatory diseases in the future.
4.1. Progress in Basic Research of Colchicine in the treatment of Atherosclerosis
As a classic anti‐inflammatory drug, colchicine has been widely studied in basic research, but not so much in atherosclerosis. However, with the exciting results from the large‐scale clinical trial, Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) in 2019, the status of colchicine in the study of cardiovascular inflammatory diseases has been raised to an unprecedented height.
Butt A et al. developed an abdominal aortic atherosclerosis rabbit models induced by a high cholesterol diet and balloon endothelial denudation. The 20 rabbits were divided into two groups: colchicine group and placebo control group. All rabbits were examined by MRI, F‐FDG PET/CT, optical correlation tomography (OCT) and histological assessment. The results showed that colchicine may have the effect of stabilizing atherosclerotic plaque by reducing inflammation and plaque load without changing macrophage infiltration and plaque type.39 The authors studied the phenotypes of atherosclerotic plaque load and plaque stability through multimodal small animal imaging methods, which would provide important reference values for follow‐up experiments.
4.2. Progress in Clinical Research of Colchicine in the treatment of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease (CAD)
In the past ten years, several clinical studies were carried out to observe the therapeutic role of anti‐inflammatory drugs on cardiovascular diseases. Distinguished among them is the CANTOs trial (Canakinumab Anti‐inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study) in 2007. It proved that IL‐1β monoclonal antibody can effectively reduce the synthesis of liver C‐reactive protein and reduce adverse cardiovascular events.40, 41 As a classic anti‐inflammatory drug, colchicine has been used to prevent atherosclerosis in clinical trials. In 2013, Stefan M et al. conducted the Low‐dose Colchicine trail (LoDoCo trial). This was a single‐blind, randomized controlled trial that followed 532 patients with stable CAD for up to 2 years. The results showed that, compared with the control group, 0.5 mg of colchicine per day can effectively reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events.42 In recent years, there have been several large‐scale clinical studies. At the end of 2019, the results of the COLCOT trial (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) showed that the use of colchicine (0.5 mg per day) within 30 days after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular ischemic events.1 Compared with the LoDoCo trial, the subsequent LoDoCo2 trial in 2020 adopted a double‐blind, randomized controlled design and assigned 5522 patients with chronic coronary artery disease to either a study group taking 0.5 mg of colchicine per day or a control group taking a placebo. During the 2.4‐year follow‐up, the colchicine group showed significantly reduced spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular deaths, deficiency and PCI events caused by ischemia in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.43
Michelle Samuel MPH et al. obtained a total sample size of 11 594 CAD patients (colchicine n = 5774; placebo n = 5820) through databases and conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials, showing that in terms of secondary cardiovascular prevention, compared with the standard drug therapy alone, adding low‐dose colchicine can reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events.44
However, in 2020, the COPS trial conducted a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study on 795 ACS patients. Patients in the colchicine group took 1 mg/day of colchicine in the first month after admission to the hospital with a diagnosis of ACS. The dose of colchicine taken for the next 11 was months 0.5 mg/day. After 1 year of follow‐up study, the results of the study showed that low‐dose colchicine (0.5 mg per day) not only failed to have a significant effect on cardiovascular results, but also was associated with a higher rate of mortality.45 The results of this large clinical study seemed inconsistent with the positive anti‐inflammatory effects of colchicine in CVD diseases. The authors believe that colchicine can indeed effectively reduce IL‐1β, IL‐6 and CRP in the treatment of ACS patients, but long‐term use of colchicine leads to higher non‐cardiovascular mortality in ACS patients. This may be related to the dose of colchicine (0.5 mg twice per day) taken by ACS patients in the first month. Although colchicine can effectively reduce inflammation, it can easily cause adverse digestive reactions and induce infections. Because of its side effects, further clinical and basic research is needed in order to determine the safety and reliability of this medication (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Trail | Year | Patients | Setting | Study design | Agent dose | Main clinical results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LoDoCo42 | 2013 | 532 | Stable CAD (n = 282), controls (n = 250) | Single‐blind RCT | Colchicine 0.5 mg/d | In patients with stable coronary disease, low dose of colchicine (0.5 mg per d) seems to effectively prevent cardiovascular events |
CANTOS40 | 2017 | 10061 | MI ≥ 30 d (n = 6717), controls (n = 3344) | Double‐blind, placebo controlled RCT | Canakinumab 50 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg/3 mo | 150 mg of Canakinumab every 3 mo resulted in a significantly lower incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo, regardless of the reduction in blood lipid levels |
CIRT47 | 2019 | 4786 | Resent MI (n = 2391), controls (n = 2395) | Double‐blind, placebo controlled RCT | Methotrexate 15–20 mg/wk | Low‐dose methotrexate does not reduce IL−1β, IL−6 or C‐reactive protein levels, and does not cause fewer cardiovascular events than placebo |
COLCOT48 | 2019 | 4745 | Resent MI (n = 2366), controls (n = 2379) | Double‐blind, placebo controlled RCT | Colchicine 0.5 mg/d | 0.5 mg of colchicine per day has a much lower rate of ischemic cardiovascular events than placebo |
COPS45 | 2020 | 795 | ACS and CAD (n = 396), controls (n = 399) | Double‐blind, placebo controlled RCT | Colchicine 1 mg/d for 1 mo, then 0.5 mg/day for 11 mo | The addition of colchicine to standard drug therapy has no significant effect on the cardiovascular outcome of ACS patients at 12 mo and is associated with a higher mortality rate |
LoDoCo243 | 2020 | 5522 | Stable CAD (n = 2762), controls (n = 2760) | Double‐blind, placebo controlled RCT | Colchicine 0.5 mg/d | Patients receiving 0.5 mg of colchicine per day had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events than patients receiving placebo |
Abbreviations: ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CAD, coronary atherosclerotic disease; CANTOS, Canakinumab Anti‐inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study; CIRT, Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial; COLCOT, Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial; COPS, The Australian COPS Trial; LoDoCo, the Low‐dose Colchicine trail; LoDoCo2, the Low‐dose Colchicine trail 2; MI, myocardial infraction; RCT, Redis Computed Tomography.
5. CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS
First of all, the development of atherosclerosis is inseparable from inflammation. The inflammatory response is mainly induced by OxLDL and cholesterol crystals, which cause the assembly and activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes in macrophages, and increase the expression of downstream inflammatory factors, through the NLRP3 inflammasome, IL‐1β, IL‐6 and C‐reactive protein inflammatory response axis. As an anti‐inflammatory drug, colchicine mainly inhibits the inflammatory response in atherosclerosis in three ways, as follows: ① damping P2X7‐induced K+ channel opening and reduce K+ efflux; ② restraining microtubule synthesis and reducing the assembly of NLRP3 inflammasomes and ASC and the formation of NLRP3 inflammatory complex; ③ inhibiting caspase‐1 conversion pro‐IL‐1β into the active form of IL‐1β. Eventually, it will reduce the levels of IL‐1β, thereby inhibiting the inflammatory response in atherosclerosis.
At present, atherosclerosis is mainly treated by lipid lowering drugs such as statins are extremely widely used and have achieved very significant clinical effects. The clinical application of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody (PCSK9 inhibitor) has opened a new gate for lipid‐lowering therapy, but atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process, and lipid‐lowering drugs cannot effectively reduce the inflammatory response. Some recent basic‐research studies have also shown that although colchicine cannot effectively restrict the development of atherosclerosis, it can effectively reduce inflammation and damp the burden of atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, colchicine also has the effect of stabilizing plaques and reducing the risk of plaque rupture.
With the continuous understanding of the mechanisms of atherosclerosis, anti‐inflammatory therapy is approaching clinical applications. From the initial IL‐1β monoclonal antibody, to methotrexate, and then to the currently studied colchicine, IL‐1β monoclonal antibodies can effectively reduce the occurrence of inflammation and adverse cardiovascular events. Although monoclonal antibodies represented by Canakinumab have been approved for clinical use in the treatment of diseases such as AOSD and SJIA, they have not yet been approved by the FDA for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In addition, Canakinumab is very expensive, making its widespread clinical use difficult. Colchicine, a very cheap drug, can effectively block NLRP3 inflammasomes and reduce inflammation. It has been proven in basic research to effectively reduce atherosclerotic plaque load and increase plaque stability. In multiple large‐scale clinical studies, low‐dose colchicine (0.5 mg) per day has been proven not only to reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction, but also to effectively decrease adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases.
While colchicine is anti‐inflammatory, it also comes with many side effects, such as diarrhoea and abdominal pain. When the dose of colchicine is not well controlled, it will not only cause reductions in platelets and neutrophils, and increase the risk of infection in patients,46 but even also induce aplastic anaemia in severe cases. These side effects and adverse reactions put certain limitations on colchicine in the anti‐inflammatory treatment of cardiovascular diseases, but we believe that as long as the dosage of colchicine is well controlled, its safety properly monitored, and a new mode of administration developed, colchicine will certainly have a very important place in the future treatment of cardiovascular inflammatory diseases.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Yuyu Li: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Resources (lead); Software (lead); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Yuxin Zhang: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Jianrong Lu: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Visualization (supporting). Yong Yin: Formal analysis (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting). Jun Xie: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Biao Xu: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We want to thank Dr. Yu Qi and Dr. Jinxuan Zhao for scientific advices and Dr. Jiaxin Hu for technical assistance.
Li Y, Zhang Y, Lu J, Yin Y, Xie J, Xu B. Anti‐inflammatory mechanisms and research progress of colchicine in atherosclerotic therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:8087–8094. 10.1111/jcmm.16798
Contributor Information
Jun Xie, Email: xiejun@nju.edu.cn.
Biao Xu, Email: xubiao62@nju.edu.cn.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ridker PM. From CANTOS to CIRT to COLCOT to clinic: will all atherosclerosis patients soon be treated with combination lipid‐lowering and inflammation‐inhibiting agents? Circulation. 2020;141(10):787‐789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leung Y, Yao Hui L, Kraus V. Colchicine‐Update on mechanisms of action and therapeutic uses. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45(3):341‐350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Libby P, Everett BM. Novel antiatherosclerotic therapies. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(4):538‐545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mayerl C, Lukasser M, Sedivy R, Niederegger H, Seiler R, Wick G. Atherosclerosis research from past to present–on the track of two pathologists with opposing views, Carl von Rokitansky and Rudolf Virchow. Virchows Arch. 2006;449(1):96‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Classics in arteriosclerosis research: On experimental cholesterin steatosis and its significance in the origin of some pathological processes by N. Anitschkow and S. Chalatow, translated by Mary Z. Pelias, 1913. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas, Tex). 1983;3(2):178‐182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nordestgaard B, Wootton R, Lewis B. Selective retention of VLDL, IDL, and LDL in the arterial intima of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits in vivo. Molecular size as a determinant of fractional loss from the intima‐inner media. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15(4):534‐542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borén J, Williams K. The central role of arterial retention of cholesterol‐rich apolipoprotein‐B‐containing lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a triumph of simplicity. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016;27(5):473‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Westerterp M, Gautier E, Ganda A, et al. Cholesterol accumulation in dendritic cells links the inflammasome to acquired immunity. Cell Metab. 2017;25(6):1294‐1304.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duewell P, Kono H, Rayner KJ, et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1357‐1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL‐beta. Mol Cell. 2002;10(2):417‐426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Man S, Karki R, Kanneganti T. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol Rev. 2017;277(1):61‐75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Centola M, Wood G, Frucht D, et al. The gene for familial Mediterranean fever, MEFV, is expressed in early leukocyte development and is regulated in response to inflammatory mediators. Blood. 2000;95(10):3223‐3231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosenfeld M, Campbell L. Pathogens and atherosclerosis: update on the potential contribution of multiple infectious organisms to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(5):858‐867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cain K, Langlais C, Sun X, Brown D, Cohen G. Physiological concentrations of K+ inhibit cytochrome c‐dependent formation of the apoptosome. J Biolo Chem. 2001;276(45):41985‐41990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muñoz‐Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martínez‐Colón G, Smith B, Rajendiran T, Núñez G. K⁺ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1142‐1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Westerterp M, Fotakis P, Ouimet M, et al. Cholesterol efflux pathways suppress inflammasome activation, NETosis, and atherogenesis. Circulation. 2018;138(9):898‐912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Misawa T, Takahama M, Kozaki T, et al. Microtubule‐driven spatial arrangement of mitochondria promotes activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(5):454‐460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rhoads J, Lukens J, Wilhelm A, et al. Oxidized low‐density lipoprotein immune complex priming of the Nlrp3 inflammasome involves TLR and FcγR cooperation and is dependent on CARD9. Journal of immunology. 2017;198(5):2105‐2114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ridker P, Howard C, Walter V, et al. Effects of interleukin‐1β inhibition with canakinumab on hemoglobin A1c, lipids, C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6, and fibrinogen: a phase IIb randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Circulation. 2012;126(23):2739‐2748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, et al. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):847‐856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dostert C, Pétrilli V, Van Bruggen R, Steele C, Mossman B, Tschopp J. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science (New York, NY). 2008;320(5876):674‐677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Back M, Yurdagul A Jr, Tabas I, Oorni K, Kovanen PT. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(7):389‐406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Libby P. Interleukin‐1 beta as a target for atherosclerosis therapy: biological basis of CANTOS and beyond. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(18):2278‐2289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beltrami‐Moreira M, Vromman A, Sukhova G, Folco E, Libby P. Redundancy of IL‐1 Isoform Signaling and Its Implications for Arterial Remodeling. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang X, Feuerstein G, Gu J, Lysko P, Yue T. Interleukin‐1 beta induces expression of adhesion molecules in human vascular smooth muscle cells and enhances adhesion of leukocytes to smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 1995;115(1):89‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tyrrell D, Goldstein D. Ageing and atherosclerosis: vascular intrinsic and extrinsic factors and potential role of IL‐6. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2020;18(1):58‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Le J, Vilcek J. Interleukin 6: a multifunctional cytokine regulating immune reactions and the acute phase protein response. Laboratory investigation. J Techn Meth Pathol. 1989;61(6):588‐602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Castell J, Gómez‐Lechón M, David M, Fabra R, Trullenque R, Heinrich P. Acute‐phase response of human hepatocytes: regulation of acute‐phase protein synthesis by interleukin‐6. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 1990;12(5):1179‐1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ridker P, Cushman M, Stampfer M, Tracy R, Hennekens C. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(14):973‐979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Phelps P. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte motility in vitro: IV. Colchicine inhibition of chemotactic activity formation after phagocytosis of urate crystals. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:S25‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Asako H, Kubes P, Baethge B, Wolf R, Granger D. Colchicine and methotrexate reduce leukocyte adherence and emigration in rat mesenteric venules. Inflammation. 1992;16(1):45‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cronstein B, Molad Y, Reibman J, Balakhane E, Levin R, Weissmann G. Colchicine alters the quantitative and qualitative display of selectins on endothelial cells and neutrophils. J Clin Investig. 1995;96(2):994‐1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chia EW, Grainger R, Harper JL. Colchicine suppresses neutrophil superoxide production in a murine model of gouty arthritis: a rationale for use of low‐dose colchicine. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153(6):1288‐1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Martinon F, Petrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout‐associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marques‐da‐Silva C, Chaves M, Castro N, Coutinho‐Silva R, Guimaraes M. Colchicine inhibits cationic dye uptake induced by ATP in P2X2 and P2X7 receptor‐expressing cells: implications for its therapeutic action. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(5):912‐926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pelegrín P. Many ways to dilate the P2X7 receptor pore. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(5):908‐911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Otani K, Watanabe T, Shimada S, et al. Colchicine prevents NSAID‐induced small intestinal injury by inhibiting activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robertson S, Martínez G, Payet C, et al. Colchicine therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients acts on caspase‐1 to suppress NLRP3 inflammasome monocyte activation. Clin Sci. 2016;130(14):1237‐1246. 10.1042/CS20160090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Butt A, Cave B, Maturana M, Towers W, Khouzam R. The role of colchicine in coronary artery disease. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(3):100690‐ 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ridker P, Everett B, Thuren T, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119‐1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ridker P, MacFadyen J, Everett B, Libby P, Thuren T, Glynn R. Relationship of C‐reactive protein reduction to cardiovascular event reduction following treatment with canakinumab: a secondary analysis from the CANTOS randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10118):319‐328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nidorf SM, Eikelboom JW, Budgeon CA, Thompson PL. Low‐dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):404‐410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, et al. Colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;31:2021372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Samuel M, Tardif JC, Bouabdallaoui N, et al. Colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(5):776‐785. 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tong D, Quinn S, Nasis A, et al. Colchicine in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the Australian COPS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2020;142(20):1890‐1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Stewart S, Yang K, Atkins K, Dalbeth N, Robinson P. Adverse events during oral colchicine use: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ridker P, Everett B, Pradhan A, et al. Low‐dose methotrexate for the prevention of atherosclerotic events. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(8):752‐762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tardif J, Kouz S, Waters D, et al. Efficacy and safety of low‐dose colchicine after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497‐2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analysed during the current study.