Abstract
Insulinomas are the most common type of functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Although insulinomas usually are noninvasive or benign, 10% are deemed invasive or malignant. The pathologic mechanisms that lead to the malignant phenotype are not well elucidated. In this case report, we present a patient with stage 4 malignant insulinoma with metastasis to the liver, bone, and brain. Genetic analysis of the tumor showed that the tumor was mismatch-repair deficient and had a high rate of microsatellite instability. There was loss of MLH1- and PMS2-encoded protein expression, and MLH1 and MEN1 variants were identified. Notably, the liver metastasis showed considerable tumor heterogeneity (well differentiated) compared with the brain metastasis (poorly differentiated).
Keywords: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic insulinoma, msi- high, cancer-immunotherapy, men 1
Introduction
Insulinomas are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) that originally were thought to originate from islet cells (β cells), however, more recent studies have suggested that the progenitor cell is from the acinar/ductal system [1]. Although most panNETs are nonfunctional, insulinomas account for approximately 60% of the functional panNETs [2,3]. Patients can present with the classic Whipple triad, which consists of symptoms of hypoglycemia, documented low blood sugar at the time of symptoms, and reversal of symptoms with glucose administration. Symptoms of hypoglycemia can include confusion, visual changes, and unusual behavior (e.g. staring off into space). Further, hypoglycemia results in the activation of the sympathetic-adrenal axis which can result in diaphoresis, palpitations, and tremulousness. At diagnosis, approximately 90% of insulinomas are localized and are considered benign [2,4]. PanNETs are classified on the basis of morphologic differentiation and proliferation rate (Ki-67 and mitotic index) [5].
Most panNETs are nonhereditary (sporadic) tumors, but approximately 10% are attributable to inherited disorders such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1 syndrome), von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1, or tuberous sclerosis [6]. MEN1 syndrome is a hereditary condition characterized by development of multiple tumors in hormone-producing glands such as the parathyroid glands, anterior pituitary gland, and pancreas.
Patients with MEN1 syndrome have an 80% to 100% chance of panNET development, and 20% of these panNETs will be an insulinoma [4]. Because this disease is typically localized, the mainstay of treatment is surgical resection. The 10-year risk of recurrence is higher for patients with MEN1 syndrome (20% for patients with MEN1, 5% for patients without MEN1). For patients with malignant (ie, metastatic) insulinoma, the 10-year survival rate is approximately 30%, whereas it is approximately 90% for patients with localized disease [7].
Case presentation
We describe a case of malignant insulinoma that is notable for the following unique aspects: the tumor was mismatch-repair deficient and microsatellite instability−high (dMMR/MSI-high), the patient had MLH1 (somatic) and MEN1 (germline) sequence variants, and a brain metastasis was identified with a gallium 68 (68Ga) DOTATATE positron emission tomography−computed tomography (PET-CT) scan. The reporting of this clinical case is in compliance with the CARE guidelines [8].
A 59-year-old White woman presented to the emergency department with the chief concern of refractory hypoglycemia. A physical examination showed unremarkable findings. Pertinent laboratory test results included a glucose level of 46mg/dL (reference range, 70-100); chromogranin A, 1,559ng/mL (reference, <93); insulin, 27.1mcIU/mL (reference, 2.6-24.9); and C-peptide, 6.5ng/mL (reference, 1.1-4.4). A magnetic resonance image of the abdomen with contrast showed a pancreatic tail mass, along with innumerable liver lesions and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging (coronal) shows a pancreatic tail mass (red arrow), liver metastasis (blue arrow), and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (asterisk).
A biopsy specimen, taken from a liver lesion, showed a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with a Ki-67 of 30% (grade 3) (Figures 2, 3).
Figure 2. Liver, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x 200).
Figure 3. Liver, Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain (original magnification x 400). The proliferation rate was estimated to be 30%.
Given the patient’s hypoglycemia, she received intravenous infusions of 10% glucose and octreotide, and diazoxide treatment was initiated. That same day, an interventional radiologist performed a bland embolization to the right lobe of the liver. The patient’s blood glucose level subsequently stabilized, and she was discharged.
In the clinic, the patient started treatment with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6). The patient achieved a partial response, but progressive sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy developed after five months and mFOLFOX6 was discontinued. The patient had one cycle of capecitabine and temozolomide, but she had severe cytopenia and rapid progression of disease in the abdomen. A 68Ga DOTATATE PET-CT scan was obtained and identified a large right parietal brain tumor (approximately 3.3 cm) with associated edema, mass effect, and mild midline shift, along with a left frontal lobe lesion (Figure 4). The scan also showed a pancreatic tail lesion, hepatic metastasis, and uptake in the right pelvis (Figure 5).
Figure 4. 68Gallium DOTATATE positron emission tomography−computed tomography imaging (axial) of the brain shows a right parietal lesion and left frontal lesion.
Figure 5. 68Gallium DOTATATE positron emission tomography−computed tomography imaging (axial) shows a pancreatic tail lesion (red arrow).
She underwent a right craniotomy and resection of the metastatic lesion. Pathologic analysis showed a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with a Ki-67 of 90% (Figures 6, 7).
Figure 6. Brain, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x 400).
Figure 7. Brain, Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain (original magnification x 400). The proliferation rate was estimated to be 90%.
Next-generation sequencing of the original liver biopsy specimen was performed after the surgery and showed pathologic sequence variations in the MEN1 and MLH1 genes (Table 1).
Table 1. Genetic Features of the Malignant Insulinoma.
| Pathogenic sequence variant | Protein alteration | Exon | DNA alteration |
| MEN1 (germline) | R516fs | 10 | c.1546delC |
| MLH1 (somatic) | K255fs | 9 | c.762_763delGA |
The tumor had an intermediate mutational burden (eight variants/Mb). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the tumor showed loss of MLH1 protein expression (weakly positive, +1) but no PMS2 expression. MSH6 and MSH2 protein expression were normal at 2+ (Figures 8, 9, 10, 11).
Figure 8. MLH1, weakly positive (+1).
Figure 9. PMS2, absent.
Figure 10. MSH2, positive (+2).
Figure 11. MSH6, positive (+2).
Immunostaining with the SP142 antibody showed no PD-L1 expression. Additionally, polymerase chain reaction testing confirmed the MSI-H status. Of note, the brain pathology specimen was not sent for next-generation sequencing.
Given the molecular findings of dMMR/MSI-H, the patient promptly started treatment with the anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab. The patient received two doses, but unfortunately, her clinical status quickly declined because of increasing abdominal pain, progressive weakness, and failure to thrive. The patient entered hospice care and died shortly thereafter.
Discussion
Genetics of MEN1, MLH1, and MSI-H
Using multiplex, next-generation sequencing, we identified pathologic frameshift sequence variations in MEN1 (germline variant) and MLH1 (somatic variant) (Table 1). The MEN1 gene, first discovered in 1988, is located on chromosome 11q13 and encodes the protein menin. MEN1 is a tumor-suppressor gene involved in cell cycle regulation, but the exact mechanism of tumorigenesis in MEN1 variants is not completely understood. Somatic variants of MEN1 have been identified in several nonhereditary tumors such as parathyroid adenomas, gastrinomas, and insulinomas [9,10]. Loss of heterozygosity of MEN1 can lead to MEN1 syndrome. Notably, 25% to 44% of MEN1 variants identified in panNETs are somatic in nature [11-13]. The variant identified in our patient is a known germline disease-associated allele (ClinVar database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/200999/). Our patient did not have a known family history of MEN1 syndrome.
MLH1 is part of a gene family (which includes MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, and PMS2) that is responsible for the surveillance and repair of DNA base mismatches (ie, mismatch repair), in which loss leads to dysregulated DNA repair. The human genome has long stretches of conserved repetitive DNA sequences that help protect the coding regions. These stretches are prone to variation, and thus, if mismatch repair is dysregulated, errors can accumulate and ultimately result in MSI-H. This faulty DNA repair is best exemplified by Lynch syndrome, an inherited autosomal dominant disease, in which variants in mismatch repair genes lead to increased risk of various malignancies, most commonly colon and uterine cancer. Studies have shown that up to 36% of panNET cases have MLH1 loss. One mechanism by which this occurs is hypermethylation of the gene [14,15]. Mei et al. studied 55 sporadic insulinomas and showed that 20 (36%) showed reduced expression of MLH1 (defined as <25% positive with IHC staining) or loss of MLH1 (determined with IHC), which corresponded to a 33% rate of MSI-H [16].
Detection of brain metastasis with 68Ga DOTATATE PET-CT
Brain metastasis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors is rare, affecting an estimated 1.5% to 5% of cases [16]. In our review of the literature, we identified only two prior reports of insulinoma with brain metastasis [17,18]. The 68Ga DOTATATE PET-CT scan has dramatically increased the ability to detect previously occult disease [19]. The sensitivity of this imaging technique is shown in our case because it identified intracranial disease (brain metastasis) in a patient who had no neurologic symptoms at the time. It should be noted that meningiomas also have somatostatin expression and thus will exhibit uptake, which could lead to a false-positive result in a patient with neuroendocrine disease.
Conclusions
This case report describes a patient with a malignant insulinoma with some unique features, including MEN1 and MLH1 sequence variants, dMMR/MSI-H status from loss of MLH1, and identification of brain metastasis with 68Ga DOTATATE PET-CT. It is important to point out the heterogeneity of the tumor, which presented as a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and later manifested with poorly differentiated morphology in the brain. Also of interest was the lack of response to pembrolizumab, even though the tumor was dMMR/MSI-H. Based on the above case and the available literature, we recommend testing patients with panNETs, specifically insulinomas, for the presence or absence of MMR proteins or MSI status.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
Pashtoon M. Kasi: Advisory/Consultancy: •Taiho Oncology (to institution) •Ipsen (to institution) •Natera •Foundation Medicine •Merck •AstraZeneca •Bayer •Daiiche Sankyo (AZ) •Delcath Pashtoon M. Kasi: Research/Trial Support (to institution) •BMS •Celgene •Astrazeneca •BTG/Boston Scientific •Advanced Accelerator Applications •Array Biopharma •RenovoRx •Amgen •Tersera •Seagen •Roche/Genentech
Jason Starr declare(s) personal fees from Pfizer. Jason Starr declare(s) personal fees from Tersera. Jason Starr declare(s) personal fees from Advanced Accelerated Applications. Jason Starr declare(s) personal fees from Ipsen.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Non-islet origin of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Vortmeyer AO, Huang S, Lubensky I, Zhuang Z. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:1934–1938. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Metz DC, Jensen RT. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1469–1492. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Well-differentiated pancreatic nonfunctioning tumors/carcinoma. Falconi M, Plockinger U, Kwekkeboom DJ, et al. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;84:196–211. doi: 10.1159/000098012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Inherited pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes: advances in molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and controversies. Jensen RT, Berna MJ, Bingham DB, Norton JA. Cancer. 2008;113:1807–1843. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. Vol. 10. Lyon: IARC; 2017. Neoplasms of the neuroendocrine pancreas; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hereditary neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system. Anlauf M, Garbrecht N, Bauersfeld J, et al. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:0–38. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0450-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Functioning insulinoma--incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival of patients: a 60-year study. Service FJ, McMahon MM, O'Brien PC, Ballard DJ. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66:711–719. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013;2:38–43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.MEN1 and microRNAs: the link between sporadic pituitary, parathyroid and adrenocortical tumors? Nagy Z, Szabó PM, Grolmusz VK, Perge P, Igaz I, Patócs A, Igaz P. Med Hypotheses. 2017;99:40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Somatic mutations of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene in sporadic gastrinomas and insulinomas. Zhuang Z, Vortmeyer AO, Pack S, et al. https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/57/21/4682.short. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4682–4686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Endocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: pathologic and genetic features. Capelli P, Martignoni G, Pedica F, Falconi M, Antonello D, Malpeli G, Scarpa A. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:350–364. doi: 10.5858/133.3.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.MEN1 in pancreatic endocrine tumors: analysis of gene and protein status in 169 sporadic neoplasms reveals alterations in the vast majority of cases. Corbo V, Dalai I, Scardoni M, et al. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:771–783. doi: 10.1677/ERC-10-0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Jiao Y, Shi C, Edil BH, et al. Science. 2011;331:1199–1203. doi: 10.1126/science.1200609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.DNA-repair defects in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and potential clinical applications. Liu IH, Ford JM, Kunz PL. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;44:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Comprehensive genomic profiling of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) Puccini A, Poorman K, Salem ME, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:5943–5951. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clinical implications of microsatellite instability and MLH1 gene inactivation in sporadic insulinomas. Mei M, Deng D, Liu TH, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3448–3457. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Metastatic insulinoma to the brain. Frazier JL, Weingart JD. Endocrinologist. 2009;19:5. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Clinical management of malignant insulinoma: a single institution's experience over three decades. Yu J, Ping F, Zhang H, et al. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018;18:92. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0321-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brain metastases of a neuroendocrine tumor visualized by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Hoberück S, Michler E, Zöphel K, Platzek I, Kotzerke J, Brogsitter C. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:50–52. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]











