Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Jul 21;75(8):e14053. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14053

Age of people with type 2 diabetes and the risk of dying following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Zixing Tian 1, Adrian H Heald 1,2,, Mike Stedman 3, Helene Fachim 2, Mark Livingston 4,5, Martin Gibson 1,2, Yonghong Peng 6, William Ollier 6
PMCID: PMC8420526  PMID: 34289646

Letter to the Editor

In 2020, the whole world has been challenged by the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus (Coronavirus‐19).1 Following coronavirus‐19 infection people with diabetes are at higher risk than those who do not have diabetes, of becoming very unwell and in some cases dying.2, 3, 4 Notably, Barron et al 4 reported an odds ratio (OR) of 2.03 (95% CI 1.97‐2.09) for in‐hospital coronavirus‐19‐related death in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). A body of work is emerging which is beginning to explain why people with diabetes are more likely to become seriously unwell following a coronavirus‐19 infection. However, much of the detail remains to be determined.3

For people with diabetes, 2020 has been a very difficult year, with the awareness that their condition puts them at an increased risk of becoming very seriously unwell/dying following coronavirus‐19 infection. It is, therefore, critical to determine all the factors that put any person with diabetes at an increased risk of a serious outcome after contracting a coronavirus‐19 infection.

In one area of the United Kingdom (Salford) over the period of March‐October 2020, we examined the potential risk factors relating to mortality in people with T2DM, who were confirmed as being coronavirus‐19 positive. We examined health records for a representative sample of 308 T2DM people who were confirmed to be infected with coronavirus‐19.

All data for this study were fully anonymised prior to analysis. The data were only released after the approval of the project by the Salford Integrated Record (SIR) Board.

Of these 56 people died, with the peak mortality rates seen in the months of April/May 2020. All patient data were fully anonymised prior to analysis.

Overall deaths for T2DM individuals living in Salford were 100% higher in March, 220% higher in April and 34% higher in May 2020 compared with the previous 5‐year average monthly mortality rates for people with T2DM. Those who died following a confirmed coronavirus‐19 infection were significantly older than those who survived (age ± 95% confidence Interval (CI)) at 82.8 ± 10.3 vs 70.7 ± 14.8 years (P <.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only age (Odds ratio (OR) (95% CI)) 1.07 (1.02‐1.12) was the predictive of death following coronavirus‐19 infection, independent of gender, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, serum creatinine, serum cholesterol, smoking status, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio. None of the other variables (than age) were statistically significant.

We were not able to include ethnicity in the analysis, as the sample included only a small number of people of non‐Caucasian ethnic origin.

This analysis highlights the fact that age outweighs many other factors in people with T2DM in relation to mortality from the coronavirus‐19 once infected, as previously proposed by McCullough et al5 in a paper advocating that age should be an important feature in risk stratification for early ambulatory treatment in the context of a Sars‐Cov‐2 (Covid‐19) infection. The age factor should, therefore, be taken into account in relation to the vaccination programme against the coronavirus‐19 in people with T2DM in the United Kingdom and elsewhere, while emphasising as always, support for concordance with lifestyle and pharmacological management in order to optimise the health of the individual.

DISCLOSURE

None of the co‐authors has any conflict of interest.

DATA SOURCES

The data used in the analyses presented were obtained with the permission of the Salford Integrated Record (SIR) board and were fully anonymised prior to being made available to the investigators.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.https://www.who.int/health‐topics/coronavirus. Accessed December 24, 2020.
  • 2.Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Sala C. COVID‐19 and diabetes: is there enough evidence? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020;22:943‐948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Katulanda P, Dissanayake HA, Ranathunga I, et al. Prevention and management of COVID‐19 among patients with diabetes: an appraisal of the literature. Diabetologia. 2020;63:1440‐1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barron E, Bakhai C, Kar P, et al. Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID‐19‐related mortality in England: a whole‐population study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:813‐822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCullough P. Innovative early sequenced multidrug therapy for Sars‐Cov‐2 (Covid‐19) infection to reduce hospitalization and death. Int J Med Sci Clin Invent. 2020;2020:5139‐5150. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES