Abstract
Background
Increased coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) incidence and mortality in hospitalised patients with psychiatric and neurologic disorders have been reported.
Methods
The clinical records of 198 patients with psychiatric and neurological disorders hospitalised in the Dr Rafael Serrano Psychiatric Hospital in Puebla during the peak of the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Mexico were analysed for psychiatric or neurologic diagnosis, gender, age, medical diagnosis, and COVID‐19 prevalence. For patients with COVID‐19, the effects of gender, and medical diagnosis were explored.
Results
There was an increased COVID‐19 prevalence in the studied population (43.94%), compared with the national Mexican (~0.21% to 0.63%) and worldwide average in the general population (~0.13% to 4.28%). However, the mortality rate (5.75%) was lower than that reported in Mexico (11.28%‐13.55%), which was higher than the worldwide average (2.95%‐4.98%). We detected increased COVID‐19 prevalence in patients with comorbidities (odds ratios [OR] 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2‐1, P = .0447). Moreover, patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders have a decreased predisposition to COVID‐19 (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2‐0.8; P = .0250), as opposed to patients with intellectual disability that are predisposed to COVID‐19 (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 0.2‐0.8; P = .0434), in comparison with the rest of the hospital population.
Conclusion
The prevalence of COVID‐19 in hospitalised patients with psychiatric disorders is increased compared with that of the general population; however, a lower mortality rate was detected. Also, an increased risk of COVID‐19 was detected in patients with comorbidities. Interestingly, the observed variation in COVID‐19 prevalence in patients with schizophrenia and intellectual disability was not associated with age or other specific medical diagnoses.
What’s known
Patients with psychiatric or neurological diseases seem to be vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), evidenced by increased mortality.
What’s new
Increased risk for COVID‐19, but a decreased risk of mortality due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was detected in hospitalized patients with psychiatric or neurological diseases, in comparison with the national and worldwide scenario.
Moreover, among these hospitalized patients, the ones diagnosed with schizophrenia are less susceptible to COVID‐19, and patients with intellectual disability are more susceptible to COVID‐19.
1. INTRODUCTION
It is known that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), the causal agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), has neurotropic properties. 1 , 2 , 3 Upper respiratory tract infections caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 may lead to brain infection via the olfactory bulb. 4 , 5 Once in the brain, SARS‐CoV‐2 causes inflammation and disrupts the integrity of the brain‐blood barrier. 2 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9
1.1. Psychiatric and neurological outcomes in COVID‐19
Moreover, several mental diseases have been associated with COVID‐19, including anxiety, depression, and psychotic episodes, as well as cerebrovascular events. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 In a study of the New York City population, it was detected that 13.5% of COVID‐19 patients have neurological symptoms. 14 Also, another study that analysed 236 379 patients with COVID‐19 reported that around one‐third of these patients developed psychiatric or neurological disorders. 15 In such a manner, COVID‐19 is not only a risk factor for the development of mental disease but also psychiatric and neurological symptoms that are also part of the outcome of the disease.
Neurological disturbances caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection suggest that people diagnosed with mental diseases may be vulnerable to COVID‐19. There is miscellaneous information about COVID‐19 prevalence in psychiatric patients. It has been reported that people with a psychiatric diagnosis are susceptible to COVID‐19 in the US 16 and UK populations. 17 Lee et al 18 did not find increased COVID‐19 prevalence in psychiatric patients in the South Korean population, but these results have been questioned because of the variability of diagnostic criteria. 19 However, the impact of sociodemographic variables on COVID‐19 prevalence cannot be neglected, since some reports indicate that COVID‐19 prevalence and the outcome are affected by belonging to ethnic minorities and the lack of public health service access in both the general population 20 and people with mental diseases. 21
In this report, we analysed the prevalence of COVID‐19 in hospitalised patients with psychiatric and neurological diseases grouped into schizophrenia spectrum disorders, intellectual disability, bipolar disorders, substance‐related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders, and neurological disorders, to detect if any specific diagnosis is associated with an increase in COVID‐19 prevalence.
2. METHODS
2.1. Study design
This cohort study was conducted at Dr Rafael Serrano Psychiatric Hospital of the Secretary of Health in Puebla, Mexico. Data were obtained from 198 hospitalised psychiatric patients from 29 June to 30 September 2020, which corresponds to the peak of the first wave of the pandemic in Mexico. All procedures described in this study were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the “Hospital Psiquiátrico Dr Rafael Serrano” (6.2/21/01) and are in accordance with the Guide for the Execution of Research Projects of Health in Human Beings (NOM‐012‐SSA3‐2012) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Moreover, all data were analysed anonymously, according to ethical standards in biomedical research.
All the patients of this study were already admitted to the hospital at the time of the study. For these patients, we extracted psychiatric diagnostic codes from the electronic health records. Patients were categorised into five categories according to the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD10) as follows: schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F20, F21, and F22), intellectual disability (F70, F71, and F72), bipolar disorders (F31), substance‐related and addictive disorders (F10, F11, and F18), neurocognitive disorders (F05 and R41), and neurological disorders (F03 and G40). The characteristics of the psychiatric population of the hospital are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of the hospital population
| Characteristics | No. (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (n = 56) | Intellectual disability (n = 114) | Bipolar disorders (n = 9) | Substance‐related and addictive disorders (n = 7) | Neurocognitive disorders (n = 5) | Neurological diseases (n = 7) | |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 19 (34.0) | 57 (50.0) | 9 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 2 (40.0) | 5 (71.4) |
| Female | 37 (66.0) | 57 (50.0) | — | 1 (14.3) | 3 (60.0) | 2 (28.6) |
| Age (y) | ||||||
| Mean (SD) | 55.20 (15.36) | 50.68 (15.85) | 54.29 (13.66) | 50.14 (6.23) | 69 (17.18) | 56.86 (12.19) |
| 18‐65 | 39 (69.64) | 92 (80.70) | 8 (88.89) | 7 (100) | 1 (20.0) | 5 (71.43) |
| >65 | 17 (30.36) | 22 (19.3) | 1 (11.11) | — | 4 (80.0) | 2 (28.57) |
| Medical diagnosis | ||||||
| No comorbidities | 40 (71.43) | 55 (48.24) | 6 (66.67) | 5 (71.43) | 3 (60.0) | 4 (57.14) |
| Diabetes | 3 (5.36) | 3 (2.63) | 1 (11.11) | — | 1 (20.0) | — |
| Hypertension | 3 (5.36) | 12 (10.53) | 1 (11.11) | 1 (14.28) | — | — |
| Heart failure | 1 (1.78) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Hypothyroidism | 8 (14.28) | 17 (14.91) | 1 (11.11) | 1 (14.28) | — | 1 (14.28) |
| Hyperthyroidism | — | — | 1 (11.11) | — | — | 0 (NA) |
| Epilepsy | 1 (1.78) | 42 (36.84) | — | — | 1 (20.0) | 3 (42.86) |
| Asthma | — | 1 (0.88) | — | — | — | — |
| COVID‐19 tested | 37 (66.07) | 77 (67.54) | 7 (77.78) | 6 (85.71) | 2 (40.0) | 6 (85.71) |
| Positive | 18 (48.65) | 56 (72.73) | 6 (85.71) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) |
| Positivity:negativity ratio | 0.95:1 | 2.67:1 | 6:1 | 1:1 | 1:1 | 1:1 |
Abbreviation: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; SD, standard deviation.
2.2. COVID‐19 protocol
After a clinical examination and direct or indirect questioning for COVID‐19, polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS‐CoV‐2 were only performed in patients who had been in contact with a person who had tested positive for COVID‐19, or which presented or referred COVID‐19‐related symptoms; this was applied for admitted and hospitalised patients. Not all the patients were tested for COVID‐19. In such a manner, only patients who were tested for COVID‐19 were selected for the prevalence study (Figure 1). The baseline characteristics of the selected patients for the prevalence study are shown in Table 2.
FIGURE 1.
Study design
TABLE 2.
Baseline characteristics of patients with positive COVID‐19 test results
| Characteristics | No. (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (n = 18) | Intellectual disability (n = 56) | Bipolar disorders (n = 6) | Substance‐related and addictive disorders (n = 3) | Neurocognitive disorders (n = 1) | Neurological diseases (n = 3) | |
| Male | 5 (27.78) | 30 (53.57) | — | 3 (100) | 1 (100) | 2 (66.67) |
| Age (y) | ||||||
| Mean (SD) | 54.5 (12.39) | 49.13 (15.54) | 52.67 (14.21) | 54.67 (2.08) | 73 (NA) | 67.33 (11.59) |
| 18‐65 | 13 (72.23) | 46 (82.14) | 5 (83.34) | 3 (100) | — | 1 (33.34) |
| >65 | 5 (27.77) | 10 (17.86) | 1 (16.66) | — | 1 (100) | 2 (66.66) |
| Medical diagnosis | ||||||
| No comorbidities | 10 (55.56) | 29 (51.78) | 3 (50.0) | 2 (66.67) | 1 (100) | — |
| Diabetes | 1 (5.56) | 2 (3.57) | 1 (10.66) | — | — | — |
| Hypertension | 1 (5.56) | 8 (14.28) | 1 (10.66) | — | — | — |
| Hypothyroidism | 6 (33.34) | 6 (10.71) | 1 (10.66) | 1 (33.33) | — | 1 (33.33) |
| Hyperthyroidism | — | — | 1 (10.66) | — | — | — |
| Epilepsy | — | 20 (35.71) | — | — | — | 3 (100) |
| COVID‐19 symptoms | ||||||
| Asymptomatic | 9 (50.0) | 18 (32.14) | 2 (33.33) | 1 (33.33) | — | 2 (66.67) |
| Mild | 5 (27.77) | 26 (46.43) | 1 (16.67) | 2 (66.67) | — | — |
| Moderate | 3 (16.57) | 9 (16.07) | 3 (50.0) | — | — | 1 (33.33) |
| Severe | 1 (5.56) | 3 (5.36) | — | — | 1 (100) | — |
| ICU | ||||||
| Transfers | 4 (22.23) | 12 (21.43) | 3 (50.0) | — | — | 1 (33.33) |
| Days, mean (SD) | 11.75 (11.87) | 13.33 (10.96) | 13.67 (4.04) | — | — | 29 (NA) |
| Aftermaths | ||||||
| Lung damage | 1 (5.55) | 2 (3.57) | — | — | — | — |
| Asthenia | — | 1 (1.78) | — | — | — | — |
| Dyspnea | — | 1 (1.78) | — | — | — | — |
| CVE | — | — | 1 (16.67) | — | — | — |
| Deaths | 2 (11.10) a | 2 (3.57) b | — | — | 1 (100) | — |
Abbreviations: CVE, cerebrovascular event; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit; SD, standard deviation.
One death with epilepsy as comorbidity.
Both deaths with epilepsy and hypothyroidism as comorbidities.
Coronavirus disease 2019 was classified according to the symptoms as follows: asymptomatic (no symptoms), mild (fever, cephalea, cough, odynophagia, rhinorrhea, and asthenia), moderate (pneumonia), and severe groups (severe pneumonia and needing O2 supplementation). 22 Patients who were suspected of, or confirmed with having COVID‐19, were isolated in private rooms in the same hospital. Patients with moderate and severe COVID‐19 were transferred to an intensive care unit in a special COVID‐19 hospital in the city.
2.3. Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages. Fisher's exact test (two‐sided) was used to compare gender, psychiatric diagnosis, and medical diagnosis between each diagnosis against the rest of the psychiatric population. Also, unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated for gender, psychiatric diagnosis, and medical diagnosis as risk factors for COVID‐19 prevalence in the patients with psychiatric or neurological disorders, as well as for gender and medical diagnosis in schizophrenia spectrum disorder and intellectual disability groups. The P‐value for statistical significance was established at 0.05. Data analysis was carried out in GraphPad Prism 9.0.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Baseline characteristics of the studied population
The characteristics of the hospital population are shown in Table 1. Between 29 June to 30 September 2020, from a total hospitalised population of 198 patients, 135 were tested for COVID‐19 (68.18%). Of the tested patients, 87 were positive for COVID‐19 (64.44%), of which 46 were females (52.87%) and 41 were males (47.13%); with a mean age of 51.57 years (SD = 14.89). The COVID‐19 prevalence in the hospital population was 43.94%.
3.2. COVID‐19 prevalence in patients with psychiatric and neurologic disorders
The baseline characteristics of the patients with positive COVID‐19 test results are shown in Table 2. Of patients with psychiatric disorders and COVID‐19, 18 were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (20.69%; positivity:negativity ratio = 1:1), 56 with intellectual disability (64.37%; positivity:negativity ratio = 2.7:1), 6 with bipolar disorder (6.9%; positivity:negativity ratio = 6:1), 3 with substance‐related and addictive disorder (3.45%; positivity:negativity ratio = 1:1), 1 with neurocognitive illness (1.14%; positivity:negativity ratio = 1:1), and 3 with neurological disease (3.45%; positivity:negativity ratio = 1:1).
3.3. COVID‐19 symptoms and aftermaths in patients with psychiatric and neurologic disorders
Of the 87 patients with COVID‐19, 32 were asymptomatic (36.78%), 42 developed mild symptoms (39.08%), 7 presented moderate clinical outcomes (18.39%), and 5 severe cases were detected (5.75%). Most patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were asymptomatic (n = 9, 50.0%) in contrast with patients with mild symptoms (n = 5, 27.78%), while in patients with intellectual disability, the opposite occurred—the majority developed mild symptoms (n = 26, 46.43%). Twenty patients (22.99%) were transferred to the intensive care unit, of which 4 were from the schizophrenia spectrum disorder group (22.23%), 12 the intellectual disability group (21.43%), 3 the bipolar disorder group (50%), and 1 the neurological diseases group (33.33%). Aftermaths resulting from COVID‐19 were detected in 6 patients (6.9%), including 3 with lung damage, 1 with asthenia, 1 with dyspnea, and 1 with a cerebrovascular event. Patients with COVID‐19 aftermaths had schizophrenia spectrum disorders (n = 1, 5.56%), intellectual disability (n = 4, 7.14%), and bipolar disorder diagnosis (n = 1, 16.67%).
3.4. COVID‐19 mortality in patients with psychiatric and neurologic disorders
Five deaths caused by COVID‐19 were reported (6.9%), of which 2 were in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (11.10%), 2 with intellectual disability (3.57%), and 1 with neurocognitive disorder (100%). However, during the time under study, 4 other patients diagnosed with intellectual disability died because of atypical pneumonia, 2 of them were not tested and 2 of them tested negative for COVID‐19.
3.5. COVID‐19 prevalence varies among psychiatric diagnoses: decrease in patients with schizophrenia and increase in patients with intellectual disability
Among psychiatric diagnoses (Figure 2), patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders had a decreased prevalence of COVID‐19 compared with other psychiatric conditions (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2‐0.8, P = .0250). On the other hand, patients with intellectual disabilities were associated with an increase in COVID‐19 prevalence compared with other psychiatric conditions (OR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1‐4.5, P = .0434). Patients with no comorbidities are less prone to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (OR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2‐1, P = .0447). However, neither gender nor specific medical diagnosis was associated with an increase in COVID‐19 prevalence (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.
Risk factors associated with COVID‐19 diagnosis in hospitalised patients with psychiatric or neurological disorders. COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019
Moreover, neither gender, nor comorbidities, nor specific medical diagnosis was associated with an increase in the prevalence of COVID‐19 in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (Figure 3) or intellectual disability (Figure 4).
FIGURE 3.
Risk factors associated with COVID‐19 diagnosis in hospitalised patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019
FIGURE 4.
Risk factors associated with COVID‐19 diagnosis in hospitalised patients with intellectual disability. COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019
4. DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first study that analyses the prevalence of COVID‐19 among hospitalised patients with psychiatric or neurological disease diagnoses in the Mexican population. Our data indicate that in the studied cohort of patients, the ones with schizophrenia spectrum disorder diagnosis may have a decreased prevalence of COVID‐19, while patients with intellectual disability may be susceptible to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
Although we did not have a non‐psychiatric/neurologic group to compare our findings, and this represents a limitation of our work, in the next two sections, we contextualise our data with the COVID‐19 statistics for the general Mexican and worldwide population from 29 June to 30 September 2020 (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Mexican and worldwide COVID‐19 data used for comparisons
| Mexico a | 29 June 2020 | 30 September 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| COVID‐19 tested | 596 168 | 1 748 357 |
| COVID‐19 positive | 271 900 | 808 439 |
| Positivity rate (%) | 45.61 | 46.24 |
| COVID‐19 deaths | 36 853 | 91 218 |
| Mortality rate (%) | 13.55 | 11.28 |
| Worldwide b | ||
| COVID‐19 positive | 10 009 310 | 34 034 818 |
| COVID‐19 deaths | 498 163 | 1 002 871 |
| Mortality rate (%) | 4.98 | 2.95 |
4.1. COVID‐19 prevalence in patients with psychiatric and neurological disorders, in comparison with the Mexican and worldwide general situation
The percentage of positivity for COVID‐19 among the psychiatric hospitalised tested population (64.44%) was higher than the general population Mexican positivity percentage during the studied period (45.61%‐46.24%; for details, see Table 3). 23 Moreover, the COVID‐19 prevalence in the studied psychiatric population (43.94%) was higher than the Mexican (~0.21%‐0.63%) and worldwide (~0.13%‐4.28%) confirmed COVID‐19 prevalence in the general population during the studied period. 23 , 24 These results confirm the susceptibility of patients with psychiatric and neurological disorders to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Also, it has been reported that schizophrenia patients not only have an increased risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection 25 but also increased COVID‐19‐related mortality, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 which can be even three times higher than in control patients. 26
4.2. COVID‐19‐related deaths in patients with psychiatric and neurological disorders, in comparison with the Mexican and worldwide general situation
Regarding the rate mortality of COVID‐19 in this cohort of patients (5.75%), it is lower than that reported in the general Mexican population (13.55%‐11.28%), 23 which is higher than the worldwide mortality (4.98%‐2.95%) in the studied period (for details, see Table 3). Antonio‐Villa et al 30 evaluated the COVID‐19 pandemic in Mexico City and reported that the mortality rate is higher in people in active economically active sectors and of marginalised municipalities with a high population density. This reinforces the reports that sustain that socioeconomic conditions are a determining factor for mortality and the outcome of COVID‐19 worldwide. 20 However, increased mortality in the hospitalised psychiatric population has been documented. 26 , 27 Interestingly, in the cohort of patients studied in this research, only five deaths caused by COVID‐19 were reported, representing 6.9% of the positive cases. This can be explained by the isolation protocols for suspicious and positive patients with COVID‐19. Another factor that may have contributed to the COVID‐19 outcome reported here is that this psychiatric hospital, as well as other Mexican mental health institutions, does not have to be converted into COVID units, as has been documented in other countries. 31 , 32
Moreover, patients with schizophrenia disorders have an increased COVID‐19‐related death rate (11.10%) in comparison with patients with intellectual disability (3.57%). This can be explained by the proportion of people over 65 with COVID‐19, which is higher in the schizophrenia disorder group (27.77%) than in the intellectual disability group (17.86). This is congruent with the information about COVID‐19 mortality, which is higher in patients age 65 years or older. 33 , 34 , 35
4.3. Risk factors for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and COVID‐19 mortality
We found that the presence of comorbidities in patients with psychiatric or neurologic disorders favours SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This is congruent with several reports that have associated comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes, with an increased incidence and mortality in COVID‐19. 36 Interestingly, neither hypertension nor diabetes seems to represent a risk factor for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or the development of severe COVID‐19 and did not affect the mortality rate in this cohort of patients.
The proportion of patients over 65 years of age with COVID‐19 and schizophrenia spectrum disorders is 27.77%, which is higher than patients with COVID‐19 and intellectual disability (17.86%). However, patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with moderate (16.57%) or severe (5.56) COVID‐19 symptoms did not vary with patients with intellectual disability: moderate (16.07%) or severe (5.36%) COVID‐19 symptoms. Interestingly, in the schizophrenia spectrum disorder group, asymptomatic COVID‐19 (50%) increased in comparison with that of the intellectual disability group (32.14%). The opposite was detected in patients with mild COVID‐19 symptoms; their proportion was higher in the intellectual disability group (46.43%) than in the schizophrenia spectrum disorder group (27.77%). These results suggest that age may not be associated with moderate or severe COVID‐19 symptoms in these patients, but study limitations cannot be neglected to influence these results (see Section 5).
4.4. Hypothesis about the low SARS‐CoV‐2 infection rate in patients with schizophrenia
Here, we analysed the association of psychiatric diagnosis with COVID‐19 predisposition, finding that schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients have a decreased COVID‐19 predisposition and intellectual disability patients have an increased COVID‐19 predisposition compared with other psychiatric patients. Specifically, in schizophrenia, increased COVID‐19 prevalence has been reported compared with that of patients without a psychiatric diagnosis. 26 However, in a couple of recent reports, the Crespo‐Facorro group has detected decreased mortality in patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics in the Spanish population, 37 , 38 and our results support this finding. Among the diverse reasons that can explain the aforementioned findings, we hypothesise that the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia may be related to this, 39 since antipsychotics (mainly second‐generation or atypical ones) have anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, and neurotropic properties. 40 However, it is important to remember that antipsychotics can also prompt the development of metabolic‐related diseases such as obesity and diabetes. 41 Thus, further studies must study the role of these drugs on the COVID‐19 outcomes.
4.5. Perspectives
Although a low prevalence of patients with COVID‐19 effects was detected (6.9%), it will be interesting to follow up with the patients who tested positive for the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, since extensive evidence about its neurotropic properties and its neuroinflammatory effects have been documented. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 9 Also, neurological symptoms have been reported in patients with COVID‐19. 11 , 14 , 42 Thus, it will be interesting to assess the long‐term effects of COVID‐19 in patients with mental diseases.
4.6. Limitations of the study
In addition to the previously mentioned lack of a non‐psychiatric/neurologic group for analysis, psychiatric and COVID‐19 treatment information was not included Moreover, obesity has been associated with increased COVID‐19 mortality, which has been confirmed in the Mexican population 36 , 43 , 44 ; in this cohort of patients, body mass index was not evaluated to explore the role of obesity in COVID‐19 outcomes. Also, the study was not powered to detect statistical significance for all comparisons. Thus, the absence of significance should not necessarily imply non‐association. Finally, the baseline male/female proportion was not equivalent; this could bias the presented data (unbeknown to us).
5. CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates that although the cohort of hospitalised psychiatric patients studied has an increased positivity ratio of COVID‐19, mortality did not vary in comparison with that of the Mexican general population. Moreover, among the general psychiatric population, the presence of comorbidities increased the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder diagnosis are less susceptible to COVID‐19. This is the opposite in patients with intellectual disabilities, who are susceptible to COVID‐19. These data may contribute to the worldwide efforts for mental health care in the COVID‐19 pandemic.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Hiram Tendilla‐Beltrán and Gonzalo Flores conceived and designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Ángel Roberto Rivas‐Ramirez and Hiram Tendilla‐Beltrán acquired, analysed, and interpreted the data. Ángel Roberto Rivas‐Ramirez, Laura Eréndira Gómez‐Mendoza, and Guillermo Loaiza provided administrative, technical, and material support. All the authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript. Guillermo Loaiza and Gonzalo Flores supervised the research. All authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Hiram Tendilla‐Beltrán acknowledges CONACYT for the PhD scholarship. Gonzalo Flores acknowledges “Sistema Nacional de Investigadores” (CONACYT) for fellowship. The authors want to thank all the health care professionals of the Dr Rafael Serrano Psychiatric Hospital. Thanks to Prof. Juan C. Leza for his helpful comments about the manuscript and Prof. Robert Simpson for the English language revision.
Rivas‐Ramírez ÁR, Tendilla‐Beltrán H, Gómez‐Mendoza LE, Loaiza G, Flores G. Patients with schizophrenia have decreased COVID‐19 prevalence among hospitalised patients with psychiatric and neurological diseases: A retrospective analysis in Mexican population. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e14528. 10.1111/ijcp.14528
Ángel Roberto Rivas‐Ramírez and Hiram Tendilla‐Beltrán contributed equally to this work.
Funding information
This work was supported by PRODEP (CA‐BUAP‐120) and the CONACYT Grant (252808) to Gonzalo Flores. None of the funding institutions had any further role in the study design, in the collection of data, analyses, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Contributor Information
Guillermo Loaiza, Email: loaizapsiq@prodigy.net.mx.
Gonzalo Flores, Email: gonzaloflores56@gmail.com.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Flores G. SARS‐COV‐2 (COVID‐19) has neurotropic and neuroinvasive properties. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;75:e13708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lee M‐H, Perl DP, Nair G, et al. Microvascular Injury in the brains of patients with Covid‐19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:481–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Iadecola C, Anrather J, Kamel H. Effects of COVID‐19 on the nervous system. Cell. 2020;183:16‐27.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS‐CoV‐2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID‐19. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:168–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brann DH, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C, et al. Non‐neuronal expression of SARS‐CoV‐2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID‐19‐associated anosmia. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabc5801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Song E, Zhang C, Israelow B, et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS‐CoV‐2 in human and mouse brain. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20202135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Crunfli F, Carregari VC, Veras FP, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infects brain astrocytes of COVID‐19 patients and impairs neuronal viability. medRxiv. 2020. 10.09.20207464. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kanberg N, Ashton NJ, Andersson LM, et al. Neurochemical evidence of astrocytic and neuronal injury commonly found in COVID‐19. Neurology. 2020;95:e1754‐e1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wang C, Zhang M, Garcia G, et al. ApoE‐isoform‐dependent SARS‐CoV‐2 neurotropism and cellular response. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:331‐342.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vatansever D, Wang S, Sahakian BJ. Covid‐19 and promising solutions to combat symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46:217–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Varatharaj A, Thomas N, Ellul MA, et al. Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID‐19 in 153 patients: a UK‐wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:875‐882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Beyrouti R, Adams ME, Benjamin L, et al. Characteristics of ischaemic stroke associated with COVID‐19. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:889‐891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tsivgoulis G, Palaiodimou L, Zand R, et al. COVID‐19 and cerebrovascular diseases: a comprehensive overview. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:175628642097800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Frontera JA, Sabadia S, Lalchan R, et al. A prospective study of neurologic disorders in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 in New York City. Neurology. 2021;96:e575‐e586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, et al. 6‐month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID‐19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:416‐427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Taquet M, Luciano S, Geddes JR, Harrison PJ. Bidirectional associations between COVID‐19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID‐19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:130‐140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yang H, Chen W, Hu Y, et al. Pre‐pandemic psychiatric disorders and risk of COVID‐19: a UK Biobank cohort analysis. Lancet Heal Longev. 2020;1:e69‐e79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lee SW, Yang JM, Moon SY, et al. Association between mental illness and COVID‐19 susceptibility and clinical outcomes in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:1025‐1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hirakawa H, Ishii N. Association between mental illness and COVID‐19 in South Korea. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:270‐271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kapilashrami A, Bhui K. Mental health and COVID‐19: is the virus racist? Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217:405‐407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S, et al. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:813‐824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. World Health Organization . Clinical management of COVID‐19: interim guidance. 2020. 27 May 2020.
- 23. Secretaría de Salud Coronavirus ‐ gob.mx. https://datos.covid‐19.conacyt.mx/. Accessed March 10, 2021.
- 24. World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus (COVID‐19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed March 10, 2021.
- 25. Kozloff N, Mulsant BH, Stergiopoulos V, Voineskos AN. The COVID‐19 global pandemic: implications for people with schizophrenia and related disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46:752‐757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fond G, Pauly V, Orleans V, et al. Increased in‐hospital mortality from COVID‐19 in patients with schizophrenia. Encephale. 2020;1:1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Li L, Li F, Fortunati F, Krystal JH. Association of a prior psychiatric diagnosis with mortality among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Infection. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3:e2023282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nemani K, Li C, Olfson M, et al. Association of psychiatric disorders with mortality among patients with COVID‐19. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;10016:1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tzur Bitan D, Krieger I, Kridin K, et al. COVID‐19 Prevalence and mortality among schizophrenia patients: a large‐scale retrospective cohort study. Schizophr Bull. 2021:sbab012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Antonio‐Villa NE, Fernandez‐Chirino L, Pisanty‐Alatorre J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the impact of sociodemographic inequalities on adverse outcomes and excess mortality during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Mexico City. medRxiv. 2021. 03.11.21253402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. De Girolamo G, Cerveri G, Clerici M, et al. Mental health in the coronavirus disease 2019 emergency—the Italian response. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77:974‐976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Arango C. Lessons learned from the coronavirus health crisis in Madrid, Spain: how COVID‐19 has changed our lives in the last 2 weeks. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88:e33‐e34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Yanez ND, Weiss NS, Romand J‐A, Treggiari MM. COVID‐19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. O’Driscoll M, Ribeiro Dos Santos G, Wang L, et al. Age‐specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS‐CoV‐2. Nature. 2021;590:140‐145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pastor‐Barriuso R, Pérez‐Gómez B, Hernán MA, et al. Infection fatality risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 in community dwelling population of Spain: nationwide seroepidemiological study. BMJ. 2020:371:m4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bello‐Chavolla OY, Bahena‐López JP, Antonio‐Villa NE, et al. Predicting mortality due to SARS‐CoV‐2: a mechanistic score relating obesity and diabetes to COVID‐19 outcomes in Mexico. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:2752‐2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Canal‐Rivero M, Catalán‐Barragán R, Rubio‐García A, et al. Lower risk of SARS‐CoV2 infection in individuals with severe mental disorders on antipsychotic treatment: a retrospective epidemiological study in a representative Spanish population. Schizophr Res. 2021;229:53‐54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Crespo‐Facorro B, Ruiz‐Veguilla M, Vázquez‐Bourgon J, et al. Aripiprazole as a candidate treatment of COVID‐19 identified through genomic analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:646701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tendilla‐Beltrán H, Flores G. Due to their anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant and neurotrophic properties, second‐generation antipsychotics are suitable in patients with schizophrenia and COVID‐19. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tendilla‐Beltrán H, del Sanchez‐Islas N , C, Marina‐Ramos M, et al. The prefrontal cortex as a target for atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia, lessons of neurodevelopmental animal models. Prog Neurogibol. 2021;199:101967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, et al. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2015;1:15067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chou SH‐Y, Beghi E, Helbok R, et al. Global incidence of neurological manifestations among patients hospitalized with COVID‐19—a report for the GCS‐NeuroCOVID consortium and the ENERGY consortium. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2112131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Vera‐Zertuche JM, Mancilla‐Galindo J, Tlalpa‐Prisco M, et al. Obesity is a strong risk factor for short‐term mortality and adverse outcomes in Mexican patients with COVID‐19: a national observational study. Epidemiol Infect. 2021;9:1‐45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Najera H, Ortega‐Avila AG. Health and institutional risk factors of COVID‐19 mortality in Mexico, 2020. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60:471‐477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request.