Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2021 Aug 9;49(15):9004–9006. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab698

Correction to ‘SIRT3 consolidates heterochromatin and counteracts senescence’

Zhiqing Diao 1,2,5, Qianzhao Ji 3,4,5, Zeming Wu 5,6,7,8,5, Weiqi Zhang 9,10,11,12,5, Yusheng Cai 13,14,15, Zehua Wang 16,17, Jianli Hu 18,19,20, Zunpeng Liu 21,22, Qiaoran Wang 23,24,25, Shijia Bi 26,27, Daoyuan Huang 28, Zhejun Ji 29,30,31, Guang-Hui Liu 32,33,34,35,36,, Si Wang 37,38,39,40,, Moshi Song 41,42,43,44,, Jing Qu 45,46,47,48,
PMCID: PMC8421138  PMID: 34370038

The authors wish to introduce the following corrections to their article (1).

The human SIRT3 DNA sequence was inaccurately noted in Figure 1B. The correction does not affect any result, conclusion, or discussion of this study. A new Figure 1 is provided below.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Downregulation of SIRT3 in senescent hMSCs and generation of SIRT3-deficient hESCs. (A) Western blot analysis of SIRT3, P16 and P21 expression in replicative senescent hMSCs. Early passage (EP), passage 4 (P4); late passage (LP), P14. β-Tubulin was used as loading control. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0. 01; ***P < 0. 001. (B) Schematic diagram of SIRT3 gene editing strategy using CRISPR/Cas9- mediated non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) in hESCs. The SIRT3 sgRNA is shown in blue. 1-bp insertion (shown in red) was identified by DNA sequencing. (C) Western blot analysis of SIRT3 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hESCs. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. ***P < 0.001. (D) Copy number variation (CNV) analysis of SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hESCs by whole genome sequencing. (E) Immunofluorescent (IF) images of pluripotency markers NANOG, SOX2 and OCT4 and phase-contrast images for SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hESCs. Scale bar, 25 μm (IF images) and 250 μm (phase-contrast images). (F) Immunofluorescence analysis of Ki67 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hESCs. Scale bar, 10 μm. The statistical analysis of Ki67-positive cells is shown on the right. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. ns, not significant.

In Figures 2H and 3J on SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at early and late passages, the same representative blot for β-Tubulin was inadvertently used, while multiple different blots had been generated from independent experiments. In the early versions of figures, Figures 2H and 3J were displayed together and therefore only one blot for β-Tubulin was presented. When the two figure panels were finally split, the authors neglected to add a second representative blot for β-Tubulin, which had already been generated. The corrected blots for β-Tubulin in Figure 2H from the same set of experiments support the original result in this study. A new Figure 2 is provided below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

SIRT3 deficiency accelerates hMSC senescence and cellular dysfunction. (A) Schematic diagram showing the generation of SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs from hESCs. (B) Western blot analysis of SIRT3 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4). β-Actin was used as a loading control. (C) Growth curve showing cumulative population doubling of SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (D) Clonal expansion analysis of SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. ***P < 0.001. (E) Immunofluorescence analysis of Ki67 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Scale bar, 25 μm. The statistical analysis of Ki67-positive cells is shown on the right. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (F) SA-β-gal staining of SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (G) RT-qPCR analysis for the expression of IL6, IL8, LMNB1 (Lamin B1) and TMPO (LAP2) in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Data are representative of three independent experiments. (H) Western blot analysis of P21, LAP2 and SIRT3 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). β-Tubulin was used as loading control. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (I) Nuclear area analysis in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 and nuclear area was measured with ImageJ. Scale bar, 5 μm. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n ≥ 150. ***P < 0.001. (J) Immunofluorescence analysis of γH2AX and 53BP1 in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). Scale bar, 10 μm. The statistical analysis of γH2AX and 53BP1 double-positive cells is shown on the right. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 3. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (K) Photon flux from tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of nude mice transplanted with SIRT3+/+ (left) or SIRT3–/– hMSCs (right) expressing luciferase. Luciferase activity in TA tissue was detected using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS). Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n = 5. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05.

The n values of the data in Supplementary Figure S2G were not clearly stated. Revised Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

Revised caption:

(G) Transmission electron microscopy analysis of mitochondrial number and area in SIRT3+/+ and SIRT3–/– hMSCs at EP (P4) and LP (P9). White arrow indicates mitochondrion. Scale bar, 400 nm. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. n ≥ 290 mitochondria for mitochondrial area measurement and n > 40 cells for the determination of the number of mitochondria per cell. ***, P < 0.001.

The published article has been updated. None of the corrections affect the results, conclusions, or discussion of this study.

Contributor Information

Zhiqing Diao, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Qianzhao Ji, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Zeming Wu, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.

Weiqi Zhang, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.

Yusheng Cai, State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.

Zehua Wang, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Jianli Hu, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.

Zunpeng Liu, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Qiaoran Wang, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.

Shijia Bi, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Daoyuan Huang, Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

Zhejun Ji, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.

Guang-Hui Liu, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

Si Wang, State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

Moshi Song, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.

Jing Qu, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing 100101, China.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Diao Z., Ji Q., Wu Z., Zhang W., Cai Y., Wang Z., Hu J., Liu Z., Wang Q., Bi S.et al.. SIRT3 consolidates heterochromatin and counteracts senescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:4203–4219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES