Curcumin suppresses the progression of gastric cancer by regulating circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis

Abstract

Curcumin has been demonstrated to be an anti-tumor agent in many types of cancers, including gastric cancer (GC). However, the molecular mechanisms by which curcumin performs its anti-tumor effects remain elusive. circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p are reported to be involved in GC progression, but their relationships with curcumin are unclear. In this study, circ_0056618 was elevated, and miR-194-5p was reduced in GC tissues and cells. Curcumin treatment led to a decrease in circ_0056618 level in GC cells. Overexpression of circ_0056618 promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and suppressed cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in curcumin-treated GC cells. Moreover, miR-194-5p was identified as the target of circ_0056618, and its expression in GC cells increased after curcumin treatment. Overexpression of miR-194-5p reversed the promotional effect of circ_0056618 on cell progression in curcumin-treated GC cells. Additionally, curcumin treatment repressed the tumorigenesis of GC in vivo through regulating circ_0056618. Curcumin treatment delayed the development of GC partly through decreasing circ_0056618 and increasing miR-194-5p.

1. Introduction

As a cancer with high incidence worldwide, gastric cancer (GC) severely affects the quality of people’s life [1,2]. Presently, the primary therapeutic strategies for GC include surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy [3]. Unfortunately, although diagnosis and therapy methods have been improved, the prognosis remains poor due to cancer relapse and metastasis [4,5]. Thus, there is an urgent need to search for novel treatment methods for this lethal disease.

Curcumin is a natural polyphenolic compound isolated from turmeric, which has lipid-lowering, anti-tumor, anti-inflammation, and anti-oxidation effects [6,7]. Recently, studies have shown that curcumin can reduce the malignancy of several cancers, such as pancreatic cancer [8], retinoblastoma [9], osteosarcoma [10], and bladder cancer [11]. Moreover, curcumin has also been reported to have an anti-tumor effect on GC [12,13]. Nonetheless, the role and underlying mechanism of curcumin in GC have not been well recognized.

circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a family of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that possess closed-loop structures and play a vital role in gene expression via competitive targeting microRNAs (miRNAs) [14]. circRNAs have been verified to play essential roles in the carcinogenesis of GC. For example, circ_104916 could hamper the viability and metastasis of GC cells [15]. Furthermore, circDLST contributed to the metastasis and tumorigenesis of GC by interacting with miR-502-5p [16]. As for circ_0056618, Li et al. uncovered that circ_0056618 could accelerate the malignancy of GC by reducing miR-206 [17]. However, the relationship between circ_0056618 and curcumin is barely known.

miRNAs are short ncRNAs with ∼22 nucleotides and function as important modulators in various types of cancers, including GC [18,19]. It has been reported that miR-194-5p is downregulated in GC, and miR-194-5p overexpression plays a tumor-suppressive role in GC [20,21]. Furthermore, emerging evidence has reported that miRNAs are associated with the anti-tumor properties of curcumin in GC. For example, Sun et al. declared that curcumin repressed the progression of GC by elevating miR-34a [22]. Qiang et al. suggested that curcumin treatment induces GC cell apoptosis and hampers proliferation by modulation of miR-21 [23]. However, whether miR-194-5p is implicated in the anti-tumor effect of curcumin on GC remains unclear.

In this research, we explored the function of curcumin in circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p expression in GC and then elucidated the underlying mechanisms governing the tumor-inhibitory role of curcumin in GC.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sample acquisition

Seventy-one GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues were taken from Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, and preserved at −80°C prior to use. The patients enrolled in our study did not have other malignant tumors, severe infection, and cognitive impairment history. None of the patients had received any chemotherapy or radiotherapy before this study. The demographic data of 71 patients with GC are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic features of GC patients

Clinicopathologic features	n
Gender
Male	42
Female	29
Age (years)
≥60	38
<60	33
Tumor size (cm)
≥3	43
<3	28
TNM stage
I–II	21
III–IV	50
Differentiation grade
Well/moderately	25
Poorly	46
Lymph node metastasis
Yes	40
No	31

2.2. Cell culture and curcumin treatment

Normal human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) and GC cells (HGC-27 and MKN-45) were obtained from Procell (Wuhan, China) and kept in RPMI 1640 medium (Procell) added with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Procell) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Procell) at 37°C in a humid incubator containing 5% CO₂.

Curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) at a dose of 50 mM to make stock solution. The stock solution was diluted in the culture medium at a dose of 30 µM. For curcumin treatment, GC cells were subjected to 30 µM curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h in the presence of FBS (Procell). The control groups were subjected to DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) [23].

2.3. Cell transfection

The overexpression vector of circ_0056618 (circ_0056618) and its control (vector), small interfering RNA against circ_0056618 (si-circRNA) and its control (si-NC), and miR-194-5p mimics (miR-194-5p) and its control (miR-NC) were synthesized by GeneCopoeia (Guangzhou, China). HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 1.0 × 10⁴ cells per well and then transfected with the synthetic oligonucleotides (50 nM) or vectors (2 μg) by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

2.4. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay

The RNA in tissues and cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and digested with DNAse I for 1 h at 37°C to eliminate genomic DNA. The RNAs were then quantified utilizing NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or TaqMan microRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems) was used to reversely transcribe RNAs into cDNAs according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Next, the qRT-PCR was manipulated with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Dalian, China) and specific primers on the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The primers are presented in Table 2. The expression was calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCt method [24]. GAPDH and U6 were used as internal references.

Table 2.

Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR

Primers	Sequences (5′–3′)	Tm	PCR product	Ct range
circ_0056618-forward	AAGTGGTGATGTCTCGGGAAC	60	209	0.8
circ_0056618-reverse	TTCCCTATCTCCCGCTCCTA	58.8
miR-194-5p-forward	GCGGCGGTGTAACAGCAACTCC	63.64	98	1.7
miR-194-5p-reverse	ATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG	63.79
GAPDH-forward	AAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCA	57.86	172	0.8
GAPDH-reverse	GGAAGATGGTGATGGGATTT	55.05
U6-forward	CGCTTCGGCACATATACTA	54.61	87	1.3
U6-reverse	CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCA	62.78

2.5. Colony formation assay

GC cells (200 cells/well) were plated into 6-well plates. After adherence and curcumin exposure, the cells were cultivated in normal medium for about 2 weeks. The medium was changed every 3 days. Next, the colonies were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sangon, Shanghai, China) and dyed with 1% crystal violet (Sangon). The colonies containing >50 cells were counted. This experiment was conducted as previously described [9].

2.6. Flow cytometry analysis

For cell cycle analysis, GC cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) were sown into 6-well plates. On the next day, the cells were subjected to 30 µM curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. Next, the cells were harvested and fixed overnight with 70% ethanol. After that, the fixed cells were washed with PBS (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and resuspended in binding buffer at a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁶ cells/mL followed by incubation with propidium iodide (PI; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 30 min at 37°C according to manufacturers’ instructions. Finally, the stained cells were analyzed with a FACScan^® flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Atlanta, GA, USA). For cell apoptosis, the cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) were plated into 6-well plates and then administered with 30 µM curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. After that, the cells were collected, washed, resuspended, and then mixed with 5 μL of Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Annexin V-FITC; Beyotime) and 5 μL of PI (Beyotime) for 20 min in the dark according to manufacturers’ instructions. The apoptotic cells were estimated using a FACScan^® flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).

2.7. Wound healing assay

GC cells were sowed into 6-well plates (2 × 10³ cells/well) and grown until 100% confluence. Then the cells were scratched utilizing a pipette tip and washed with PBS (Solarbio) to remove the detached cells followed by treatment with curcumin for 24 h (Sigma-Aldrich). The scratched areas were photographed at 0 and 48 h at a magnification of 40× and the wound closure was recorded to assess cell migration capacity. The experiment was conducted as previously reported [25].

2.8. Transwell assay

The 24-well transwell inserts (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) coated with or without Matrigel (Solarbio) were adopted to evaluate cell invasion and migration, respectively. Briefly, after indicated transfection and treatment, HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells (2 × 10⁴ cells/well) were suspended into serum-free medium and then added into the top compartment of chambers. The bottom compartment of chambers was filled with 500 μL of culture medium to act as a chemoattractive. After 24 h, the transferred cells were dyed with 1% crystal violet (Sangon) and determined under an inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of 100×.

2.9. Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The sequences of wild-type (WT) circ_0056618 containing the putative miR-194-5p binding sites were cloned into pmirGLO plasmid (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) to establish the luciferase reporter vector circ_0056618 WT. Similarly, the sequences of mutant (MUT) circ_0056618 lacking the miR-194-5p-binding sites were inserted into pmirGLO plasmid (Promega) to generate circ_0056618 MUT. GC cells were seeded into 6-well plates (5 × 10⁴ cells/well) and then co-transfected with circ_0056618 WT or circ_0056618 MUT (100 ng) and miR-194-5p or miR-NC(50 nM). After 48 h, the Renilla and firefly luciferase activities were measured with a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).

2.10. RNA pull-down assay

RNA pull-down assay was executed utilizing the Pierce Magnetic RNA-Protein Pull-Down Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In brief, biotin-labeled wild-type miR-194-5p (Bio-miR-194-5p-WT), mutant miR-194-5p (Bio-miR-194-5p-MUT), or Bio-miR-NC was transfected into GC cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) and cultivated for 24 h. Afterward, the cells were collected, lysed, and incubated with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Biotin-coupled RNA complexes were pulled down, bound RNAs were extracted, and then the enrichment of circ_0056618 was estimated by qRT-PCR analysis.

2.11. Western blot assay

Total protein in GC cells was extracted utilizing RIPA buffer (Beyotime) and determined utilizing a BCA protein assay kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Then the equal amount of protein (30 μg) was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfonate–polyacrylamide gel (Solarbio) and blotted onto polyvinylidenedifluoride membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Chicago, IL, USA). After blocking in 5% defatted milk for 1 h, the membranes were cultivated overnight with primary antibodies against CyclinD1 (1:2,000; bs-0623R; Bioss, Beijing, China), E-cadherin (1:2,000; bs-10009R; Bioss), N-cadherin (1:2,000; bs-1172R; Bioss), or GAPDH (1:5,000; bs-2188R; Bioss) at 4°C followed by interaction with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000; bs-0295M-HRP; Bioss) for 1.5 h at room temperature. The protein bands were visualized with an ECL reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and analyzed via ImageJ v1.8.0 (National Institutes of Health).

2.12. Murine xenograft model

The BALB/c nude mice (4–6 weeks old) were obtained from Vital River Laboratory (Beijing, China) and divided into four groups (n = 6/group). For control and curcumin groups, 2 × 10⁶ MKN-45 cells suspended in PBS (Solarbio) were subcutaneously implanted into the flank of the nude mice, and DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) or 30 µM curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich) was intraperitoneally administered into the mice every 7 days. For curcumin + vector and curcumin + circ_0056618 groups, circ_0056618 or vector transfected MKN-45 cells were implanted into the nude mice and then 30 µM curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich) was intraperitoneally administered into the mice every 7 days. Tumor volume was examined every 7 days and computed via the equation: (length × width²)/2. The mice were euthanized after 28 days through cervical dislocation and the neoplasms were weighted and preserved for qRT-PCR assay.

2.13. Statistical analysis

Each experiment was conducted in triplicate. The data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7 and exhibited as mean ± standard deviation. The differences in two groups and three groups were estimated using Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis estimated the linear correlation between circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p in GC tissues after Agostino–Pearson, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and Shapiro–Wilk methods were used for the analysis of normality distribution of the data. Differences were considered as significant where P-value < 0.05 is represented as * and P-value < 0.01 is represented as **.

3. Results

3.1. circ_0056618 was upregulated and miR-194-5p was downregulated in GC tissues

Initially, qRT-PCR assay was conducted to test the expression levels of circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p in GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The results showed that circ_0056618 was highly expressed and miR-194-5p was lowly expressed in GC tissues compared to non-tumor tissues (Figure 1a and b). Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis estimated that miR-194-5p level was negatively correlated with circ_0056618 level in GC tissues (Figure 1c). These results indicated that circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p might be related to GC progression.

Figure 1.

High expression of circ_0056618 and low expression of miR-194-5p in GC tissues. (a and b) qRT-PCR analysis was conducted for circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p expression levels in GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (c) The correlation between the levels of circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p in GC tissues was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. **P < 0.01.

3.2. circ_0056618 overexpression ameliorated the effects of curcumin treatment on GC cell colony formation, cell cycle process, and apoptosis

As shown in Figure 2a, circ_0056618 level was elevated in GC cell lines (HGC-27 and MKN-45) compared to that in GES-1 cell line. Then HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were subjected to 30 µM curcumin for 24 h followed by qRT-PCR assay for circ_0056618 expression level. As a result, curcumin treatment led to an inhibition in circ_0056618 level in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells compared to control groups, but curcumin did not affect the expression of circ_0056618 in GES-1 cells (Figure 2b). Next, the transfection of circ_0056618 increased the level of circ_0056618 in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells, suggesting the successful transfection of circ_0056618 (Figure 2c). To explore the association between curcumin and circ_0056618 in the regulation of GC progression, HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were treated with control, curcumin, curcumin + vector, or curcumin + circ_0056618. As shown in Figure 2d, curcumin-mediated downregulation on circ_0056618 expression was reversed by circ_0056618 overexpression vector transfection. The results of colony formation assay indicated that the colony formation ability of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was suppressed following curcumin exposure, while circ_0056618 overexpression overturned the effect (Figure 2e–g). Flow cytometry analysis showed that the proportion of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was increased in the G0/G1 phase and reduced in the S phase after curcumin treatment, whereas the impacts were reversed by elevating circ_0056618 (Figure 2h–k). In addition, flow cytometry analysis also exhibited that curcumin treatment facilitated the apoptosis of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells, while circ_0056618 overexpression abated this effect (Figure 2l). Collectively, circ_0056618 overexpression weakened the effects of curcumin on the malignant behaviors of GC cells.

Figure 2.

Curcumin relieved the malignant cell phenotypes of GC cells by downregulating circ_0056618. (a) qRT-PCR assay was conducted for circ_0056618 level in GES-1, HGC-27, and MKN-45 cells. (b) The expression level of circ_0056618 in curcumin-treated GES-1, HGC-27, and MKN-45 cells was determined by qRT-PCR assay. (c) The expression of circ_0056618 in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells transfected with circ_0056618 or vector was examined by qRT-PCR assay. (d–l) HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were assigned to four groups: control, curcumin, curcumin + vector, and curcumin + circ_0056618. (d) The expression of circ_0056618 in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was detected by qRT-PCR assay. (f–g) The colony formation ability of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was examined by colony formation assay. (h–l) The cell cycle process and apoptosis of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were analyzed through flow cytometry analysis. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.

3.3. Overexpression of circ_0056618 reversed the inhibitory effects of curcumin on GC cell migration and invasion

To investigate whether curcumin affected the migration and invasion of GC cells through regulating circ_0056618, wound healing assay and transwell assay were carried out. Wound healing assay exhibited that curcumin treatment suppressed the ability of wound closure, indicating that the migration ability of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was suppressed, which was rescued by increasing circ_0056618 (Figure 3a and b). Moreover, transwell assay showed that the migration and invasion capacities of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were repressed by curcumin exposure, while circ_0056618 overexpression abrogated the effects (Figure 3c–e). Taken together, curcumin restrained GC cell migration and invasion by modulation of circ_0056618.

Figure 3.

circ_0056618 overexpression reversed the effects of curcumin on cell migration and invasion in GC cells. HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were assigned to four groups: control, curcumin, curcumin + vector, and curcumin + circ_0056618. (a and b) The migration of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was evaluated by wound healing assay. (c–e) The migration and invasion of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were assessed via transwell assay. **P < 0.01.

3.4. circ_0056618 functioned as a sponge of miR-194-5p

Through analyzing online tool Circinteractome (https://circinteractome.nia.nih.gov), we found that miR-194-5p contained the potential binding sites of circ_0056618, indicating that miR-194-5p might be a target of circ_0056618 (Figure 4a). As exhibited in Figure 4b, miR-194-5p transfection increased the level of miR-194-5p in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells compared to miR-NC control groups. Then dual-luciferase reporter assay and RNA pull-down assay were performed to verify the interaction between circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p. Dual-luciferase reporter assay presented that miR-194-5p transfection inhibited the luciferase activity of circ_0056618 WT, but had no effect on the luciferase activity of circ_0056618 MUT in both HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells (Figure 4c and d). RNA pull-down assay indicated that circ_0056618 could be abundantly enriched by Bio-miR-194-5p-WT probe in both HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells compared to Bio-miR-NC or Bio-miR-194-5p-MUT groups (Figure 4e and f). As expected, there was a lower expression of miR-194-5p in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells than in GES-1 cells (Figure 4g). Moreover, we found that si-circRNA transfection led to a decrease in circ_0056618 expression and an increase in miR-194-5p expression in both HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells in comparison with control groups (Figure 4h and i). Additionally, our results exhibited that curcumin treatment increased miR-194-5p level in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells, whereas circ_0056618 overexpression restored this effect (Figure 4j and k). All these results suggested that circ_0056618 directly interacted with miR-194-5p to negatively regulate miR-194-5p expression in GC cells.

Figure 4.

miR-194-5p was a target of circ_0056618. (a) The potential binding sites between miR-194-5p and circ_0056618 are shown. (b) The expression level of miR-194-5p in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells transfected with miR-NC or miR-194-5p was determined by qRT-PCR assay. (c and d) The luciferase activity in miR-194-5p/miR-NC and circ_0056618 WT/circ_0056618 MUT co-transfected HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was measured by dual-luciferase reporter assay. (e and f) After RNA pull-down assay, the enrichment of circ_0056618 in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cell lysates was determined by qRT-PCR assay. (g) qRT-PCR assay was conducted for miR-194-5p expression in GES-1, HGC-27, and MKN-45 cells. (h and i) The expression levels of circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells transfected with si-NC or si-circRNA were examined through qRT-PCR assay. (j and k) After HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were treated with control, curcumin, curcumin + vector, or curcumin + circ_0056618, the expression level of miR-194-5p was detected through qRT-PCR assay. **P < 0.01.

3.5. miR-194-5p overexpression reversed the promotional effects of circ_0056618 on the malignant behaviors of curcumin-treated GC cells

To further explore whether curcumin could decelerate the progression of GC cells through circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis, HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were treated with vector + miR-NC, curcumin + vector + miR-NC, curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-NC, or curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-194-5p. As demonstrated by colony formation, the promotional effect of circ_0056618 on cell viability could be reversed by increasing miR-194-5p in curcumin-treated HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells in comparison with control groups (Figure 5a and b). Flow cytometry analysis indicated that the promotional role in cell cycle process and the suppressive role in cell apoptosis in curcumin-treated HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells mediated by circ_0056618 overexpression were all abolished by the elevation of miR-194-5p (Figure 5c–f). In addition, the results of wound healing assay and transwell assay demonstrated that the promotional effects of circ_0056618 on cell migration and invasion in curcumin-treated HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were rescued by elevating miR-194-5p (Figure 5g–l). To sum up, circ_0056618 could promote cell progression in curcumin-treated GC cells by targeting miR-194-5p.

Figure 5.

Curcumin relieved the malignant behaviors of GC cells by regulating circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis. HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were administered with vector + miR-NC, curcumin + vector + miR-NC, curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-NC, or curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-194-5p. (a and b) The colony formation of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells was assessed by colony formation assay. (c–f) Flow cytometry analysis was conducted for cell cycle process and apoptosis. (g–l) The migration and invasion abilities of HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were evaluated by wound healing assay and transwell assay. **P < 0.01.

3.6. Effects of curcumin on the levels of CyclinD1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in GC cells

Subsequently, we determined the effects of curcumin on the expression levels of CyclinD1 and EMT-associated markers (E-cadherin and N-cadherin) in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells by western blot assay. Our results showed that curcumin treatment reduced the protein levels of CyclinD1 and N-cadherin and enhanced the protein level of E-cadherin in HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells, while circ_0056618 overexpression abrogated the impacts; moreover, the elevation of miR-194-5p further overturned the effects of circ_0056618 overexpression on CyclinD1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin levels (Figure 6a and b). These findings indicated that curcumin could modulate the expression of CyclinD1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in GC cells through circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis.

Figure 6.

Curcumin altered the expression of CyclinD1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in GC cells by modulation of circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis. (a and b) After HGC-27 and MKN-45 cells were treated with control, curcumin, curcumin + vector, curcumin + circ_0056618, curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-NC, or curcumin + circ_0056618 + miR-194-5p, the protein levels of CyclinD1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin were measured by western blot assay. **P < 0.01.

3.7. Curcumin blocked the tumorigenesis of GC in vivo by regulating circ_0056618

At last, the function of curcumin in GC growth in vivo was determined through constructing the murine xenograft model. As shown in Figure 7a and b, tumor size and weight were restrained in curcumin groups compared to control groups, and tumor size and weight were increased in curcumin + circ_0056618 groups compared to curcumin + vector groups. Moreover, we found that circ_0056618 level was decreased and miR-194-5p level was increased in the tumor tissues collected from curcumin groups, while the effects were rescued in curcumin + circ_0056618 groups (Figure 7c and d). These results suggested that curcumin hampered tumor growth of GC in vivo by regulating circ_0056618.

Figure 7.

Curcumin hampered tumor growth in vivo. (a) Tumor volume was examined every 7 days. (b) Tumor weight was examined on day 28. (c and d) The expression levels of circ_0056618 and miR-194-5p in the collected tumor tissues were measured by qRT-PCR assay. **P < 0.01.

4. Discussion

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that curcumin restrains the malignant biological behaviors of GC cells through different pathways [26–28]. Herein, we discovered that curcumin was able to inhibit GC cell growth and motility and induce apoptosis by suppressing circ_0056618 and elevating miR-194-5p.

Previous research have verified that curcumin exerts the anti-tumor effect mainly by repressing tumor cell proliferation and motility and facilitating apoptosis. For example, curcumin treatment restrained Rb cell proliferation, invasion, and migration and accelerated apoptosis [9]. Curcumin suppressed the growth and cell cycle process and facilitated the apoptosis of GC cells [22]. In line with these reports, we demonstrated that curcumin treatment restrained cell colony formation, migration, and invasion and accelerated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in GC cells in vitro and blocked tumorigenesis of GC in vivo, indicating that curcumin might be a candidate agent for GC therapy.

Zheng et al. suggested that circ_0056618 level was enhanced in colorectal cancer (CRC) and promoted CRC cell growth, angiogenesis, and migration by reducing miR-206 and elevating CXCR4 and VEGF-A [29]. Li et al. unraveled that circ_0056618 was elevated in GC and facilitated cell proliferation and motility in GC [17]. In this study, we also observed that there was an increase in circ_0056618 level in GC tissues and cells. Moreover, we found that curcumin treatment predominantly decreased the expression of circ_0056618 in GC cells. Thus, we further explored whether circ_0056618 could participate in regulating curcumin-mediated malignant phenotypes of GC cells. As a result, overexpression of circ_0056618 ameliorated curcumin-mediated anti-proliferation, anti-metastasis, and pro-apoptosis effects on GC cells, suggesting that curcumin could decelerate GC development by reducing circ_0056618 expression.

Subsequently, the underlying mechanism of how curcumin regulates GC progression was further investigated. miR-194-5p has been demonstrated to be the target of several circRNAs, such as circ_0023028 [30], circ-USP1 [31], and circ_0001971 [32]. Through bioinformatics analysis, dual-luciferase reporter assay and RNA pull-down assay, miR-194-5p was verified to be the target of circ_0056618 for the first time. Our results showed that miR-194-5p was weakly expressed in GC tissues and cells, and circ_0056618 could negatively regulate miR-194-5p expression in GC cells and curcumin-treated GC cells. Previous studies showed that miR-194-5p had the capacity to repress GC cell growth and metastasis [33,34]. In this study, our results exhibited that the elevation of miR-194-5p effectively reversed the impacts of circ_0056618 on cell growth, apoptosis, and metastasis in curcumin-treated GC cells, indicating that circ_0056618 promoted curcumin-mediated GC development by interacting with miR-194-5p.

In summary, curcumin treatment could repress GC cell growth and metastasis and promote apoptosis partly by regulation of circ_0056618/miR-194-5p axis. The findings facilitated our understanding on the mechanism of curcumin in GC therapy and indicated that curcumin might be a potential therapeutic drug for GC. In addition, accumulating evidence showed that curcumin might prevent GC through regulation of oncogenic pathways [35]. However, the underlying mechanisms still need further investigation.