Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2021 Aug 10;77(Pt 9):875–879. doi: 10.1107/S2056989021008033

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis study of (E)-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)-N-(4-ferrocenylphen­yl)methanimine

Riham Sghyar a,*, Oussama Moussaoui a, Nada Kheira Sebbar b, Younesse Ait Elmachkouri b, Ezaddine Irrou b, Tuncer Hökelek c, Joel T Mague d, Abdesslam Bentama a, El Mestafa El hadrami a
PMCID: PMC8423021  PMID: 34584753

The unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring is rotationally disordered while the other Cp ring and its substituent are close to coplanar. In the crystal, the mol­ecules pack in ‘bilayers’ parallel to the ab plane with the ferrocenyl groups on the outer faces and the substituents directed towards the regions between them. The ferrocenyl groups are linked by C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions.

Keywords: crystal structure, ferrocen­yl, imine, C—H⋯π(ring) inter­action

Abstract

The substituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring in the title mol­ecule, [Fe(C5H5)(C18H13ClN)], is nearly coplanar with the phenyl-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)methanimine substituent, with dihedral angles between the planes of the phenyl­ene ring and the Cp and 4-(chloro­phen­yl)methanimine units of 7.87 (19) and 9.23 (10)°, respectively. The unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring is rotationally disordered, the occupancy ratio for the two orientations refined to a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio. In the crystal, the mol­ecules pack in ‘bilayers’ parallel to the ab plane with the ferrocenyl groups on the outer faces and the substituents directed towards the regions between them. The ferrocenyl groups are linked by C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions. A Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (46.1%), H⋯C/C⋯ H (35.4%) and H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (13.8%) inter­actions. Thus C—H⋯π(ring) and van der Waals inter­actions are the dominant inter­actions in the crystal packing.

Chemical context  

Compounds containing metallocene building units, and particularly ferrocene derivatives, have been studied extensively both in academic and industrial settings (Santos et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019; Ong & Gasser, 2020). Owing to a favorable combination of chemical and physical properties, ferrocene derivatives are often biologically active, making them attractive pharmacophores for drug design and useful templates in medicinal chemistry research and therapeutic applications including as anti­oxidant (Bugarinović et al., 2018; Naz et al., 2020), anti-inflammatory (Yun Guo et al., 2019), anti­malarial (Peter & Aderibigbe, 2019; Xiao et al., 2020), anti­leishmanial (Rauf et al., 2016), anti­cancer (Wang et al., 2020; Ismail et al., 2020), anti­plasmodial (García-Barrantes et al., 2013), anti­convulsant (Adil et al., 2018) and anti­microbial (Damljanović et al., 2009) agents. A wide range of therapeutic activities is also associated with ferrocenyl Schiff bases, which have shown exceptionally high activities against pathogenic microbes (Chohan & Praveen, 2000; Chohan et al. 2001), and these mol­ecules exhibit potent anti­oxidant and DNA-protecting properties (Li & Liu, 2011). The potential uses of ferrocenyl Schiff bases also include the synthesis of materials for use in electrochemical sensors (Jo et al., 2007), non-linear optical materials (Yu et al., 2015), luminescent systems (Fery-Forgues & Delavaux-Nicot, 2000), homogeneous catalysis (Gibson et al., 2006), conducting polymers (Tice et al., 2007) and organometallic polymers (Xue et al., 2001). The coordination of a variety of metal centers to produce new complexes of ferrocene-derived Schiff base ligands has been studied for their inter­esting anti­bacterial activities compared to the free ligands (Chohan & Praveen, 2000). Ferrocenyl liquid crystalline Schiff bases, also known as ferrocenomesogens, present inter­esting magnetic properties such as paramagnetism and control of mol­ecular orientation in magnetic fields (Seshadri et al., 2007; Onofrei et al., 2012).graphic file with name e-77-00875-scheme1.jpg

In a continuation of our research towards the synthesis of ferrocene-derived Schiff bases, we have been using 4-ferrocenyl aniline as an inter­mediate in the synthesis of new heterocyclic systems and have studied the condensation reactions between 4-ferrocenyl aniline and 4-chloro­benzaldehyde. The title compound (I) was obtained and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques as well as by Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Structural commentary  

4-Ferrocenyl aniline was synthesized according to a reported procedure (Hu et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2013) and single crystals of its condensation product with 4-chloro­benzaldehyde were obtained by recrystallization from methanol (Fig. 1). Bond distances and angles are in the expected ranges and agree well with values observed for similar compounds (see e.g. Kumar et al., 2020; Shabbir et al., 2017; Toro et al., 2018). The unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring, C1–C5, was found to be rotationally disordered, with a refined occupancy of 0.666 (7) for the major moiety. The two Cp rings are not quite parallel as there is a 2.7 (5)° dihedral angle between them. The substituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring, C6–C10, is nearly coplanar with the phenyl-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)methanimine substituent. The Cp ring is inclined by 16.8 (2)° with respect to the C11–C16 phenyl­ene ring. The imine fragment is essentially coplanar with the chloro­phenyl unit, with an r.m.s. deviation from planarity of only 0.05 Å. The dihedral angle between the phenyl­ene ring and the plane of the 4-chloro­phenyl-methanimine unit, N1/C17–C23, is 9.23 (10)°. This renders the entire mol­ecule, with the exception of the Fe atom and the unsubstituted Cp ring, mostly flat.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Only the major orientation of the disordered cyclo­penta­dienyl ring is shown.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, mol­ecules are arranged in double layers perpendicular to the c axis with alternating ferrocenyl and Schiff base segments, with the ferrocenyl groups facing towards the outside of each layer and bordering the ferrocene moieties of the neighboring layer, and the phenyl-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)methanimine substituents at the center of the double layers with the substituents from both sides of the layer inter­digitating with each other (Figs. 2 and 3). Two double layers are found within the boundaries of the ortho­rhom­bic Pbca unit cell. The phenyl-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)methanimine substituents are thus all arranged parallel to each other (at the center of each layer). They are, however, rotated along their long axis with respect to each other, and despite their nearly coplanar nature that predestines them for π-stacking inter­actions, no such inter­actions are observed in the solid state. Indeed, directional inter­actions are sparse in the structure of the title compound. Ferrocenyl groups are tied together by C—H⋯π inter­actions, facilitated by neighboring ferrocene units within each layer being roughly 90° rotated against each other. Cp-H atoms thus point towards the π-system of neighboring Cp rings. The shortest C—H⋯π inter­actions are between H5 and H7 towards the C atoms C7 and C10 of the substituted Cp ring at −x + Inline graphic, y + Inline graphic, z (H⋯C distances are 2.77 and 2.73 Å, respectively), and between H3 and H10 towards C atoms C4 and C3 at −x + Inline graphic, y − Inline graphic, z (H⋯C distances are 2.84 and 2.82 Å, respectively). The shortest C—H centroid inter­action is for C7—H7⋯Cg2 [Cg2 is the centroid of the substituted Cp ring, C6–C10, at −x + Inline graphic, y + Inline graphic, z; H⋯Cg2 = 2.76 Å, C7⋯Cg2 = 3.683 (4) Å, C7—H7⋯Cg2 = 154°]. Also present is a C22—H22⋯Cg5 inter­action [Cg5 is the centroid of the C18–C23 ring at −x + Inline graphic, y + Inline graphic, z with H⋯Cg5 = 2.95 Å, C22⋯Cg5 = 3.605 (4) Å, C22—H22⋯Cg5 = 127°] and a weak C4—H4⋯Cl1 hydrogen bond (Cl1 at −x + 1, y + Inline graphic, −z + Inline graphic, with H4⋯Cl1 = 2.82 Å, C4⋯Cl1 = 3.66 (4) Å and C4—H4⋯Cl1 = 142°).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Detail of the inter­molecular inter­actions. C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions are depicted, respectively, by green and orange dashed lines. Non-inter­acting H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Packing viewed along the b-axis direction with inter­molecular inter­actions depicted as in Fig. 2. Non-inter­acting H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Hirshfeld surface analysis  

In order to visualize the inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal of the title compound, a Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Hirshfeld, 1977) was carried out using Crystal Explorer 17.5 (Turner et al., 2017). In the HS plotted over d norm (Fig. 4), the white surface indicates contacts with distances equal to the sum of van der Waals radii, and the red and blue colors indicate distances shorter (in close contact) or longer (distinct contact) than the van der Waals radii, respectively (Venkatesan et al., 2016). The bright-red spots indicate their roles as the respective donors and/or acceptors. The blue regions indicate positive electrostatic potentials (hydrogen-bond donors), while the red regions indicate negative electrostatic potentials (hydrogen-bond acceptors). The shape-index of the HS is a tool to visualize π–π stacking by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles; the absence of adjacent red and/or blue triangles, Fig. 5, indicates that there are no π–π inter­actions. The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot is shown in Fig. 6 a, and those delineated into H⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, H⋯N/N⋯H, C⋯C, C⋯N/N⋯C and Cl⋯Cl contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007) are illustrated in Fig. 6 bh, respectively, together with their relative contributions to the Hirshfeld surface. The most important inter­action is H⋯H, contributing 46.1% to the overall crystal packing, which is reflected in Fig. 6 b as widely scattered points of high density due to the large hydrogen content of the mol­ecule. The presence of C—H⋯π inter­actions, as described in the Supra­molecular features section, is indicated by pairs of characteristic wings in the fingerprint plot representing H⋯C/C⋯H contacts, Fig. 6 c. These H⋯C/C⋯H contacts represent a 35.4% contribution to the HS. Pairs of scattered points of spikes are seen in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H contacts, Fig. 6 d, with a 13.8% contribution to the HS. H⋯N/N⋯H contacts, Fig. 6 e, contribute only 4.0% to the HS. Finally, C⋯C (Fig. 6 f), C⋯N/N⋯C (Fig. 6 g) and Cl⋯Cl contacts (Fig. 6 h) have only 0.5%, 0.2% and 0.1% contributions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound, plotted over d norm in the range −0.1325 to 1.1632 a.u. The red dots indicate the C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions involving the ferrocene and the C18–C23 ring.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over shape-index.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯C/C⋯H, (d) H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, (e) H⋯N/N⋯H, (f) C⋯C, (g) C⋯N/N⋯C and (h) Cl⋯Cl inter­actions. The d i and d e values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface.

The Hirshfeld surface analysis confirms the importance of H-atom contacts in establishing the packing. The large number of H⋯H and H⋯C/C⋯H inter­actions suggest that C—H⋯π and van der Waals inter­actions play the major role in the crystal packing (Hathwar et al., 2015).

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (Groom et al., 2016, updated to May 29, 2021) found three closely related, ferrocene-substituted Schiff base compounds: (A: Jakku et al., 2020; B: Shabbir et al., 2017; C: Toro et al., 2018; Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Related ferrocene–Schiff base complexes.

Synthesis and crystallization  

4-Ferrocenyl aniline was synthesized according to a reported procedure (Hu et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2013). In a 250 mL round-bottom flask, 1.0 mmol of 4-ferrocenyl aniline in 15 mL of dried methanol was mixed with an equimolar amount of 4-chloro­phenyl aldehyde in 15 mL of dried methanol. The mixture was agitated under reflux, the progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC, and the desired product was formed within 6 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the solid that was obtained was recrystallized from methanol (yield: 87%) to yield brown crystals, m.p. 210 K. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.08 (s, 5H, Cp C5H5); 4.36 (t, 2H, Cp C5H4, J = 3.39) ; 4.68 (t, 2H, Cp C5H4, J = 3.45); 7.20 (d, 2H, C6H4-ar, J = 8.4); 7.48 (d, 2H, C6H4-ar, J = 8.43); 7.53 (d, 2H, C6H4-ar, J = 8.43); 7.88 (d, 2H, C6H4-ar, J = 8.44) ; 8.52 (s, 1H, CH=N). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 66.42 (2C, C5H4); 69.05 (2C, C5H4); 69,64 (5C, C5H5); 84.80 (Cq, C5H4); 121.10 (2C, CH-Ar); 126.76 (2C, CH-Ar); 129.09 (2C, CH-Ar); 129.87 (2C, CH-Ar); 134.92 (1Cq, Ar-CH=N); 137.20 (1Cq, Ar-Cl); 137.72 (1Cq, Ar-C5H4); 149.21 (1Cq, Ar-N=CH) ; 157.62 (1C, CH=N).

Refinement  

Crystal, data collection and refinement details are presented in Table 1. Analysis of 1284 reflections having I/σ(I) > 15 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008) showed the crystal to be either split or non-merohedrally twinned. The top choice of unit cell had parameters a = 7.662, b = 10.009, c = 45.974 Å, α = 90.05, β = 90.21, γ = 89.97° (unrefined) with a second component (14%) rotated 180° about the b axis. To eliminate possible bias, the raw data were processed as triclinic using the multi-component version of SAINT (Bruker, 2020) under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW, leading to an ortho­rhom­bic cell within experimental error and a twin matrix of: −0.99988 − 0.00291 − 0.00258 − 0.00684 0.99978 0.00453 0.09083 0.09422 − 0.99967, thus indicating presence of two separate domains not related by twinning (‘split crystal’). The data were corrected for absorption using TWINABS (Sheldrick, 2009), which was also used to extract a single-component reflection file from the two-component intensity data, which was used to determine the space group and solve the structure. The resulting space group of Pbca required transformation of the original cell by the matrix: 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 −1. Trial final refinements with the single-component reflection file and with the complete two-component data showed the former to be more satisfactory on the basis of a lower values for R1 and su’s on derived parameters as well as smaller residual features about the Fe atom.

Table 1. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Fe(C5H5)(C18H13ClN)]
M r 399.68
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P b c a
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 10.0991 (18), 7.7277 (14), 45.979 (8)
V3) 3588.3 (11)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.00
Crystal size (mm) 0.13 × 0.12 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer
Absorption correction Multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax 0.88, 0.96
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 12370, 4001, 2903
R int 0.046
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.653
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.063, 0.118, 1.17
No. of reflections 4001
No. of parameters 233
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.44, −0.38

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2020), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

H atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å). All were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2–1.5 times those of the parent atoms. The unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl ring is rotationally disordered over two sets of sites with the two components refined as rigid penta­gons (AFIX 56 constraint of SHELXL). ADPs of equivalent major and minor disordered C atoms were constrained to be identical. The occupancy ratio for the two orientations refined to a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016sup1.cif

e-77-00875-sup1.cif (416.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup2.hkl

e-77-00875-Isup2.hkl (319.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 2101472

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Fe(C5H5)(C18H13ClN)] Dx = 1.480 Mg m3
Mr = 399.68 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbca Cell parameters from 7602 reflections
a = 10.0991 (18) Å θ = 2.7–27.6°
b = 7.7277 (14) Å µ = 1.00 mm1
c = 45.979 (8) Å T = 150 K
V = 3588.3 (11) Å3 Plate, orange
Z = 8 0.13 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 1648

Data collection

Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer 4001 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2903 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.046
Detector resolution: 7.3910 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.6°, θmin = 1.8°
ω scans h = −13→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009) k = −10→9
Tmin = 0.88, Tmax = 0.96 l = −59→0
12370 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.118 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.17 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0177P)2 + 8.9667P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4001 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
233 parameters Δρmax = 0.44 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.38 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. The diffraction data were obtained from 7 sets of frames, each of width 0.5° in ω, collected with scan parameters determined by the "strategy" routine in APEX3. The scan time was 40 sec/frame. Analysis of 1284 reflections having I/σ(I) > 15 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008) showed the crystal to non-merohedrally twinned. The top choice of unit cell had parameters a = 7.662, b = 10.009, c = 45.974 Å, α = 90.05, β = 90.21, γ = 89.97° (unrefined) with a second component (14%) rotated 180° about the b-axis. To eliminate possible bias, the raw data were processed as triclinic using the multi-component version of SAINT (Bruker, 2020) under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW leading to an orthorhombic cell within experinental error and a twin matrix of: -0.99988 -0.00291 -0.00258 -0.00684 0.99978 0.00453 0.09083 0.09422 -0.99967.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 - 1.00 Å). All were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 - 1.5 times those of the attached atoms. The C1···C5 ring is rotationally disordered over two orientations in a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio. The two components were refined as rigid pentagons. Trial refinements with the single-component reflection file extracted from the full data set with TWINABS and with the complete two-component data showed the former to be more satisfactory on the basis of a lower values for R1 and su's on derived parameters as well as smaller residual features abot the Fe atom.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Fe1 0.50398 (5) 0.66068 (7) 0.44481 (2) 0.02709 (15)
Cl1 0.35163 (12) 0.58417 (15) 0.14716 (2) 0.0460 (3)
N1 0.3450 (3) 0.5987 (4) 0.29393 (6) 0.0302 (7)
C1 0.5820 (7) 0.8567 (9) 0.46980 (8) 0.0357 (19) 0.666 (7)
H1 0.552750 0.889508 0.489834 0.043* 0.666 (7)
C2 0.6831 (5) 0.7360 (6) 0.46279 (12) 0.0310 (15) 0.666 (7)
H2 0.736892 0.667977 0.477030 0.037* 0.666 (7)
C3 0.6915 (5) 0.7248 (7) 0.43202 (13) 0.039 (2) 0.666 (7)
H3 0.753532 0.649277 0.420787 0.047* 0.666 (7)
C4 0.5956 (7) 0.8385 (9) 0.42001 (7) 0.046 (2) 0.666 (7)
H4 0.579632 0.859268 0.398829 0.056* 0.666 (7)
C5 0.5279 (6) 0.9201 (8) 0.44336 (14) 0.040 (2) 0.666 (7)
H5 0.455543 1.007747 0.441501 0.048* 0.666 (7)
C1A 0.6195 (16) 0.814 (2) 0.46947 (16) 0.0357 (19) 0.334 (7)
H1A 0.633804 0.802489 0.490908 0.043* 0.334 (7)
C2A 0.6952 (9) 0.7317 (14) 0.4474 (3) 0.0310 (15) 0.334 (7)
H2A 0.772102 0.652440 0.450570 0.037* 0.334 (7)
C3A 0.6450 (12) 0.7860 (18) 0.42003 (19) 0.039 (2) 0.334 (7)
H3A 0.678096 0.748136 0.400551 0.047* 0.334 (7)
C4A 0.5383 (11) 0.9017 (17) 0.4252 (3) 0.046 (2) 0.334 (7)
H4A 0.481684 0.957304 0.409988 0.056* 0.334 (7)
C5A 0.5226 (14) 0.9189 (19) 0.4557 (3) 0.040 (2) 0.334 (7)
H5A 0.454299 0.990947 0.465827 0.048* 0.334 (7)
C6 0.3865 (3) 0.5206 (5) 0.41718 (7) 0.0258 (8)
C7 0.3080 (4) 0.6077 (5) 0.43866 (7) 0.0297 (9)
H7 0.236759 0.694502 0.434743 0.036*
C8 0.3495 (4) 0.5481 (5) 0.46672 (8) 0.0339 (9)
H8 0.312783 0.587107 0.485821 0.041*
C9 0.4530 (4) 0.4280 (5) 0.46280 (8) 0.0319 (9)
H9 0.502053 0.367060 0.478674 0.038*
C10 0.4771 (4) 0.4098 (5) 0.43228 (7) 0.0279 (8)
H10 0.545311 0.333379 0.423122 0.034*
C11 0.3788 (4) 0.5450 (5) 0.38538 (7) 0.0271 (8)
C12 0.4825 (4) 0.4907 (5) 0.36759 (8) 0.0309 (9)
H12 0.559850 0.442818 0.376174 0.037*
C13 0.4749 (4) 0.5055 (5) 0.33747 (8) 0.0326 (9)
H13 0.546303 0.466509 0.325738 0.039*
C14 0.3630 (4) 0.5770 (5) 0.32443 (7) 0.0290 (8)
C15 0.2619 (4) 0.6370 (5) 0.34228 (7) 0.0309 (9)
H15 0.186873 0.691251 0.333770 0.037*
C16 0.2682 (4) 0.6192 (5) 0.37221 (7) 0.0300 (9)
H16 0.196511 0.658035 0.383888 0.036*
C17 0.4136 (4) 0.5112 (5) 0.27598 (8) 0.0318 (9)
H17 0.475449 0.428943 0.283162 0.038*
C18 0.3996 (4) 0.5342 (5) 0.24447 (7) 0.0267 (8)
C19 0.4920 (4) 0.4611 (5) 0.22554 (8) 0.0318 (9)
H19 0.564591 0.397826 0.233249 0.038*
C20 0.4793 (4) 0.4793 (5) 0.19553 (8) 0.0330 (9)
H20 0.543157 0.430314 0.182773 0.040*
C21 0.3729 (4) 0.5694 (5) 0.18472 (8) 0.0321 (9)
C22 0.2802 (4) 0.6460 (5) 0.20288 (8) 0.0323 (9)
H22 0.208362 0.709972 0.195003 0.039*
C23 0.2942 (4) 0.6279 (5) 0.23271 (8) 0.0316 (9)
H23 0.231255 0.679942 0.245323 0.038*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Fe1 0.0214 (3) 0.0270 (3) 0.0329 (2) −0.0033 (3) 0.0021 (2) −0.0016 (2)
Cl1 0.0552 (7) 0.0485 (7) 0.0341 (5) −0.0034 (6) −0.0029 (5) 0.0010 (5)
N1 0.0298 (18) 0.0277 (18) 0.0332 (15) −0.0038 (16) −0.0029 (13) 0.0023 (13)
C1 0.034 (5) 0.028 (5) 0.045 (2) −0.006 (4) 0.005 (2) −0.011 (2)
C2 0.027 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.039 (4) −0.010 (2) −0.012 (3) −0.003 (3)
C3 0.025 (4) 0.053 (5) 0.038 (4) −0.017 (3) 0.004 (3) −0.015 (3)
C4 0.045 (6) 0.052 (6) 0.042 (3) −0.017 (5) −0.005 (3) 0.012 (3)
C5 0.031 (3) 0.021 (3) 0.067 (7) 0.000 (2) −0.005 (4) 0.010 (4)
C1A 0.034 (5) 0.028 (5) 0.045 (2) −0.006 (4) 0.005 (2) −0.011 (2)
C2A 0.027 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.039 (4) −0.010 (2) −0.012 (3) −0.003 (3)
C3A 0.025 (4) 0.053 (5) 0.038 (4) −0.017 (3) 0.004 (3) −0.015 (3)
C4A 0.045 (6) 0.052 (6) 0.042 (3) −0.017 (5) −0.005 (3) 0.012 (3)
C5A 0.031 (3) 0.021 (3) 0.067 (7) 0.000 (2) −0.005 (4) 0.010 (4)
C6 0.0174 (19) 0.026 (2) 0.0341 (18) −0.0029 (16) −0.0007 (14) 0.0006 (15)
C7 0.0172 (19) 0.030 (2) 0.0419 (19) −0.0017 (17) 0.0034 (15) 0.0000 (16)
C8 0.030 (2) 0.038 (3) 0.0332 (18) −0.010 (2) 0.0048 (16) −0.0002 (16)
C9 0.027 (2) 0.034 (2) 0.0351 (18) −0.0068 (19) −0.0032 (15) 0.0058 (16)
C10 0.026 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0356 (17) −0.0020 (17) −0.0034 (15) 0.0010 (15)
C11 0.021 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0373 (18) −0.0019 (17) −0.0010 (15) −0.0002 (15)
C12 0.022 (2) 0.035 (2) 0.0357 (18) 0.0002 (18) −0.0021 (15) 0.0020 (16)
C13 0.027 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.0336 (18) 0.0003 (19) 0.0021 (15) −0.0006 (16)
C14 0.029 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0351 (18) −0.0041 (18) −0.0024 (16) 0.0036 (15)
C15 0.026 (2) 0.025 (2) 0.0412 (18) 0.0032 (19) −0.0073 (16) 0.0014 (16)
C16 0.027 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0396 (18) 0.0026 (18) 0.0009 (16) −0.0014 (15)
C17 0.033 (2) 0.023 (2) 0.0394 (19) 0.0002 (19) −0.0063 (17) 0.0014 (16)
C18 0.028 (2) 0.016 (2) 0.0364 (18) −0.0043 (17) −0.0019 (15) −0.0008 (14)
C19 0.024 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.045 (2) 0.0016 (19) −0.0066 (17) 0.0003 (16)
C20 0.030 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.0421 (19) −0.0035 (19) 0.0040 (17) −0.0049 (16)
C21 0.036 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.0339 (18) −0.0058 (19) −0.0020 (16) 0.0015 (16)
C22 0.029 (2) 0.027 (2) 0.0405 (18) 0.0014 (19) −0.0068 (16) 0.0019 (17)
C23 0.029 (2) 0.028 (2) 0.0375 (18) 0.0003 (18) −0.0007 (15) −0.0031 (16)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Fe1—C2A 2.011 (11) C5A—H5A 1.0000
Fe1—C4 2.011 (5) C6—C10 1.433 (5)
Fe1—C1A 2.012 (16) C6—C7 1.434 (5)
Fe1—C5 2.020 (6) C6—C11 1.476 (5)
Fe1—C7 2.041 (4) C7—C8 1.432 (5)
Fe1—C10 2.041 (4) C7—H7 1.0000
Fe1—C3 2.044 (5) C8—C9 1.409 (6)
Fe1—C9 2.045 (4) C8—H8 1.0000
Fe1—C6 2.048 (4) C9—C10 1.431 (5)
Fe1—C8 2.051 (4) C9—H9 1.0000
Fe1—C1 2.058 (6) C10—H10 1.0000
Fe1—C3A 2.065 (11) C11—C16 1.394 (5)
Cl1—C21 1.744 (4) C11—C12 1.394 (5)
N1—C17 1.272 (5) C12—C13 1.391 (5)
N1—C14 1.424 (4) C12—H12 0.9500
C1—C5 1.4200 C13—C14 1.393 (5)
C1—C2 1.4200 C13—H13 0.9500
C1—H1 1.0000 C14—C15 1.390 (5)
C2—C3 1.4200 C15—C16 1.385 (5)
C2—H2 1.0000 C15—H15 0.9500
C3—C4 1.4200 C16—H16 0.9500
C3—H3 1.0000 C17—C18 1.467 (5)
C4—C5 1.4200 C17—H17 0.9500
C4—H4 1.0000 C18—C19 1.395 (5)
C5—H5 1.0000 C18—C23 1.396 (5)
C1A—C2A 1.4200 C19—C20 1.393 (5)
C1A—C5A 1.4200 C19—H19 0.9500
C1A—H1A 1.0000 C20—C21 1.374 (5)
C2A—C3A 1.4200 C20—H20 0.9500
C2A—H2A 1.0000 C21—C22 1.387 (5)
C3A—C4A 1.4200 C22—C23 1.386 (5)
C3A—H3A 1.0000 C22—H22 0.9500
C4A—C5A 1.4200 C23—H23 0.9500
C4A—H4A 1.0000
C2A—Fe1—C1A 41.3 (2) C1A—C2A—Fe1 69.4 (6)
C4—Fe1—C5 41.25 (11) C3A—C2A—Fe1 71.7 (5)
C2A—Fe1—C7 173.8 (4) C1A—C2A—H2A 126.0
C4—Fe1—C7 120.3 (2) C3A—C2A—H2A 126.0
C1A—Fe1—C7 139.3 (4) Fe1—C2A—H2A 126.0
C5—Fe1—C7 108.08 (19) C4A—C3A—C2A 108.0
C2A—Fe1—C10 113.8 (3) C4A—C3A—Fe1 71.3 (5)
C4—Fe1—C10 123.4 (2) C2A—C3A—Fe1 67.6 (5)
C1A—Fe1—C10 142.7 (4) C4A—C3A—H3A 126.0
C5—Fe1—C10 161.7 (2) C2A—C3A—H3A 126.0
C7—Fe1—C10 68.99 (16) Fe1—C3A—H3A 126.0
C4—Fe1—C3 40.99 (9) C5A—C4A—C3A 108.0
C5—Fe1—C3 68.85 (13) C5A—C4A—Fe1 68.9 (6)
C7—Fe1—C3 155.1 (2) C3A—C4A—Fe1 68.8 (5)
C10—Fe1—C3 105.79 (16) C5A—C4A—H4A 126.0
C2A—Fe1—C9 117.2 (3) C3A—C4A—H4A 126.0
C4—Fe1—C9 161.1 (2) Fe1—C4A—H4A 126.0
C1A—Fe1—C9 115.8 (3) C4A—C5A—C1A 108.0
C5—Fe1—C9 156.3 (2) C4A—C5A—Fe1 71.3 (5)
C7—Fe1—C9 68.63 (16) C1A—C5A—Fe1 67.6 (5)
C10—Fe1—C9 41.01 (14) C4A—C5A—H5A 126.0
C3—Fe1—C9 124.3 (2) C1A—C5A—H5A 126.0
C2A—Fe1—C6 137.5 (4) Fe1—C5A—H5A 126.0
C4—Fe1—C6 106.01 (16) C10—C6—C7 107.4 (3)
C1A—Fe1—C6 175.3 (4) C10—C6—C11 126.2 (3)
C5—Fe1—C6 124.97 (19) C7—C6—C11 126.4 (3)
C7—Fe1—C6 41.08 (14) C10—C6—Fe1 69.2 (2)
C10—Fe1—C6 41.03 (14) C7—C6—Fe1 69.2 (2)
C3—Fe1—C6 119.10 (17) C11—C6—Fe1 125.3 (3)
C9—Fe1—C6 68.92 (15) C8—C7—C6 107.9 (3)
C2A—Fe1—C8 144.8 (4) C8—C7—Fe1 69.9 (2)
C4—Fe1—C8 156.7 (2) C6—C7—Fe1 69.7 (2)
C1A—Fe1—C8 114.5 (4) C8—C7—H7 126.0
C5—Fe1—C8 121.9 (2) C6—C7—H7 126.0
C7—Fe1—C8 40.99 (14) Fe1—C7—H7 126.0
C10—Fe1—C8 68.56 (16) C9—C8—C7 108.3 (3)
C3—Fe1—C8 161.6 (2) C9—C8—Fe1 69.7 (2)
C9—Fe1—C8 40.25 (16) C7—C8—Fe1 69.1 (2)
C6—Fe1—C8 68.88 (14) C9—C8—H8 125.8
C4—Fe1—C1 68.74 (15) C7—C8—H8 125.8
C5—Fe1—C1 40.74 (12) Fe1—C8—H8 125.8
C7—Fe1—C1 126.60 (19) C8—C9—C10 108.4 (3)
C10—Fe1—C1 155.2 (2) C8—C9—Fe1 70.1 (2)
C3—Fe1—C1 68.13 (11) C10—C9—Fe1 69.3 (2)
C9—Fe1—C1 121.19 (19) C8—C9—H9 125.8
C6—Fe1—C1 163.2 (2) C10—C9—H9 125.8
C8—Fe1—C1 109.23 (18) Fe1—C9—H9 125.8
C2A—Fe1—C3A 40.75 (18) C9—C10—C6 107.9 (3)
C1A—Fe1—C3A 68.6 (3) C9—C10—Fe1 69.7 (2)
C7—Fe1—C3A 133.3 (4) C6—C10—Fe1 69.7 (2)
C10—Fe1—C3A 112.4 (3) C9—C10—H10 126.0
C9—Fe1—C3A 144.0 (4) C6—C10—H10 126.0
C6—Fe1—C3A 107.8 (3) Fe1—C10—H10 126.0
C8—Fe1—C3A 174.1 (4) C16—C11—C12 118.1 (3)
C17—N1—C14 120.4 (3) C16—C11—C6 121.7 (3)
C5—C1—C2 108.0 C12—C11—C6 120.2 (3)
C5—C1—Fe1 68.20 (19) C13—C12—C11 121.2 (4)
C2—C1—Fe1 70.44 (19) C13—C12—H12 119.4
C5—C1—H1 126.0 C11—C12—H12 119.4
C2—C1—H1 126.0 C12—C13—C14 120.4 (4)
Fe1—C1—H1 126.0 C12—C13—H13 119.8
C1—C2—C3 108.0 C14—C13—H13 119.8
C1—C2—Fe1 69.3 (2) C15—C14—C13 118.3 (3)
C3—C2—Fe1 68.7 (2) C15—C14—N1 116.6 (3)
C1—C2—H2 126.0 C13—C14—N1 125.1 (3)
C3—C2—H2 126.0 C16—C15—C14 121.3 (4)
Fe1—C2—H2 126.0 C16—C15—H15 119.3
C4—C3—C2 108.0 C14—C15—H15 119.3
C4—C3—Fe1 68.3 (2) C15—C16—C11 120.7 (4)
C2—C3—Fe1 70.9 (2) C15—C16—H16 119.7
C4—C3—H3 126.0 C11—C16—H16 119.7
C2—C3—H3 126.0 N1—C17—C18 121.6 (4)
Fe1—C3—H3 126.0 N1—C17—H17 119.2
C3—C4—C5 108.0 C18—C17—H17 119.2
C3—C4—Fe1 70.74 (19) C19—C18—C23 118.6 (3)
C5—C4—Fe1 69.7 (2) C19—C18—C17 120.2 (3)
C3—C4—H4 126.0 C23—C18—C17 121.3 (3)
C5—C4—H4 126.0 C20—C19—C18 121.1 (4)
Fe1—C4—H4 126.0 C20—C19—H19 119.5
C1—C5—C4 108.0 C18—C19—H19 119.5
C1—C5—Fe1 71.1 (2) C21—C20—C19 118.8 (4)
C4—C5—Fe1 69.0 (2) C21—C20—H20 120.6
C1—C5—H5 126.0 C19—C20—H20 120.6
C4—C5—H5 126.0 C20—C21—C22 121.8 (3)
Fe1—C5—H5 126.0 C20—C21—Cl1 119.2 (3)
C2A—C1A—C5A 108.0 C22—C21—Cl1 119.0 (3)
C2A—C1A—Fe1 69.3 (5) C23—C22—C21 119.0 (4)
C5A—C1A—Fe1 71.7 (4) C23—C22—H22 120.5
C2A—C1A—H1A 126.0 C21—C22—H22 120.5
C5A—C1A—H1A 126.0 C22—C23—C18 120.9 (4)
Fe1—C1A—H1A 126.0 C22—C23—H23 119.6
C1A—C2A—C3A 108.0 C18—C23—H23 119.6
C5—C1—C2—C3 0.0 C7—C8—C9—Fe1 58.5 (3)
Fe1—C1—C2—C3 58.00 (19) C8—C9—C10—C6 −0.1 (4)
C5—C1—C2—Fe1 −58.00 (19) Fe1—C9—C10—C6 −59.5 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.0 C8—C9—C10—Fe1 59.4 (3)
Fe1—C2—C3—C4 58.4 (2) C7—C6—C10—C9 0.6 (4)
C1—C2—C3—Fe1 −58.4 (2) C11—C6—C10—C9 178.6 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.0 Fe1—C6—C10—C9 59.4 (3)
Fe1—C3—C4—C5 60.0 (2) C7—C6—C10—Fe1 −58.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—Fe1 −60.0 (2) C11—C6—C10—Fe1 119.2 (4)
C2—C1—C5—C4 0.0 C10—C6—C11—C16 163.4 (4)
Fe1—C1—C5—C4 −59.4 (2) C7—C6—C11—C16 −18.9 (6)
C2—C1—C5—Fe1 59.4 (2) Fe1—C6—C11—C16 −107.8 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C1 0.0 C10—C6—C11—C12 −15.5 (6)
Fe1—C4—C5—C1 60.66 (17) C7—C6—C11—C12 162.2 (4)
C3—C4—C5—Fe1 −60.66 (17) Fe1—C6—C11—C12 73.3 (5)
C5A—C1A—C2A—C3A 0.0 C16—C11—C12—C13 −1.8 (6)
Fe1—C1A—C2A—C3A 61.6 (4) C6—C11—C12—C13 177.1 (4)
C5A—C1A—C2A—Fe1 −61.6 (4) C11—C12—C13—C14 0.7 (6)
C1A—C2A—C3A—C4A 0.0 C12—C13—C14—C15 1.7 (6)
Fe1—C2A—C3A—C4A 60.1 (5) C12—C13—C14—N1 179.8 (4)
C1A—C2A—C3A—Fe1 −60.1 (5) C17—N1—C14—C15 −162.1 (4)
C2A—C3A—C4A—C5A 0.0 C17—N1—C14—C13 19.8 (6)
Fe1—C3A—C4A—C5A 57.8 (6) C13—C14—C15—C16 −3.1 (6)
C2A—C3A—C4A—Fe1 −57.8 (6) N1—C14—C15—C16 178.7 (3)
C3A—C4A—C5A—C1A 0.0 C14—C15—C16—C11 2.0 (6)
Fe1—C4A—C5A—C1A 57.7 (4) C12—C11—C16—C15 0.5 (6)
C3A—C4A—C5A—Fe1 −57.7 (4) C6—C11—C16—C15 −178.4 (4)
C2A—C1A—C5A—C4A 0.0 C14—N1—C17—C18 −178.4 (3)
Fe1—C1A—C5A—C4A −60.1 (5) N1—C17—C18—C19 168.2 (4)
C2A—C1A—C5A—Fe1 60.1 (5) N1—C17—C18—C23 −12.3 (6)
C10—C6—C7—C8 −0.8 (4) C23—C18—C19—C20 −0.5 (6)
C11—C6—C7—C8 −178.9 (4) C17—C18—C19—C20 179.0 (4)
Fe1—C6—C7—C8 −59.7 (3) C18—C19—C20—C21 −0.8 (6)
C10—C6—C7—Fe1 58.9 (3) C19—C20—C21—C22 1.8 (6)
C11—C6—C7—Fe1 −119.2 (4) C19—C20—C21—Cl1 −176.9 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C9 0.8 (4) C20—C21—C22—C23 −1.4 (6)
Fe1—C7—C8—C9 −58.8 (3) Cl1—C21—C22—C23 177.3 (3)
C6—C7—C8—Fe1 59.6 (3) C21—C22—C23—C18 0.0 (6)
C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.4 (4) C19—C18—C23—C22 0.9 (6)
Fe1—C8—C9—C10 −58.9 (3) C17—C18—C23—C22 −178.7 (4)

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Tulane University; Hacettepe University Scientific Research Project Unit grant 013 D04 602 004.

References

  1. Adil, S., Khan, A. U., Badshah, H., Asghar, F., Usman, M., Badshah, A. & Ali, S. (2018). Drug Dev. Res. 79, 184–197. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2012). DIAMOND, Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Bruker (2020). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Bugarinović, J. P., Pešić, M. S., Minić, A., Katanić, J., Ilić-Komatina, D., Pejović, A., Mihailović, V., Stevanović, D., Nastasijević, B. & Damljanović, I. (2018). J. Inorg. Biochem. 189, 134–142. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Chohan, Z. H., Jaffery, M. F. & Supuran, C. T. (2001). Met.-Based Drugs, 8, 95–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Chohan, Z. H. & Praveen, M. (2000). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 14, 376–382.
  7. Damljanović, I., Vukićević, M., Radulović, N., Palić, R., Ellmerer, E., Ratković, Z., Joksović, M. D. & Vukićević, R. D. (2009). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 1093–1096. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Fery-Forgues, S. & Delavaux-Nicot, B. (2000). J. Photochem. Photobiol. 132, 137–159.
  9. García-Barrantes, P. M., Lamoureux, G. V., Pérez, A. L., García-Sánchez, R. N., Martínez, A. R. & San Feliciano, A. (2013). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 70, 548–557. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Gibson, V. C., Long, N. J., Oxford, P. J., White, A. J. & Williams, D. J. (2006). Organometallics, 25, 1932–1939.
  11. Hathwar, V. R., Sist, M., Jørgensen, M. R. V., Mamakhel, A. H., Wang, X., Hoffmann, C. M., Sugimoto, K., Overgaard, J. & Iversen, B. B. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 563–574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Hirshfeld, H. L. (1977). Theor. Chim. Acta, 44, 129–138.
  13. Ismail, M. K., Khan, Z., Rana, M., Horswell, S. L., Male, L., Nguyen, H. V., Perotti, A., Romero–Canelón, I., Wilkinson, E. A., Hodges, N. J. & Tucker, J. H. R. (2020). ChemBioChem, 21, 2487–2494. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Jakku, R., Eda, R. R., Mirzadeh, N., Telukutla, S. R., Vardhaman, A. K., Lingamallu, G., Balasubramanian, S., Deep, P., Sistla, R., Bhargava, S. & Trivedi, R. (2020). Polyhedron, 192, 114829.
  15. Jo, S. J., Jin, Y. E., Kim, J. H. & Suh, H. S. (2007). Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 28, 2015–2019.
  16. Li, Y. F. & Liu, Z. Q. (2011). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 158–163.
  17. McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. 3814–3816. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Naz, M., Ali, J., Fatima, S., Tabassum, S., Nawaz, S., Badshah, A. & Dou, H. (2020). Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 597, 124760.
  19. Ong, Y. C. & Gasser, G. (2020). Drug Discov. Today: Technol. pp. 1740–6749. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Onofrei, R. M., Carlescu, I., Lisa, G., Silion, M., Hurduc, N. & Scutaru, D. (2012). Rev. Chim. 63, 139–145.
  21. Peter, S. & Aderibigbe, B. A. (2019). Molecules, 24, 3604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Rauf, M. K., Shaheen, U., Asghar, F., Badshah, A., Nadhman, A., Azam, S., Ali, M. I., Shahnaz, G. & Yasinzai, M. (2016). Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 349, 50–62. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Santos, M. M., Bastos, P., Catela, I., Zalewska, K. & Branco, L. C. (2017). Med. Chem. 17, 771–784. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Seshadri, T., Haupt, H. J., Flörke, U. & Henkel, G. (2007). Liq. Cryst. 34, 33–47.
  25. Shabbir, M., Akhter, Z., Ahmad, I., Ahmed, S., Bolte, M., Ismail, H. & Mirza, B. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 463, 102–111.
  26. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Sheldrick, G. M. (2009). TWINABS., University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  28. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  29. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  30. Singh, A., Lumb, I., Mehra, V. & Kumar, V. (2019). Dalton Trans. 48, 2840–2860. [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Tice, N. C., Parkin, S. & Selegue, J. P. (2007). J. Organomet. Chem. 692, 791–800.
  32. Toro, P., Suazo, C., Acuña, A., Fuentealba, M., Artigas, V., Arancibia, R., Olea-Azar, C., Moncada, M., Wilkinson, S. & Klahn, A. H. (2018). J. Organomet. Chem. 862, 13–21.
  33. Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. The University of Western Australia.
  34. Venkatesan, P., Thamotharan, S., Ilangovan, A., Liang, H. & Sundius, T. (2016). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 153, 625–636. [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, R., Chen, H., Yan, W., Zheng, M., Zhang, T. & Zhang, Y. (2020). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 190, 112109. [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Xiao, J., Sun, Z., Kong, F. & Gao, F. (2020). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 185, 11791. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Xue, W. M., Kühn, F. E., Herdtweck, E. & Li, Q. (2001). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 213–221. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Yu, W., Jia, J., Gao, J., Han, L. & Li, Y. (2015). Chem. Phys. Lett. 624, 47–52.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016sup1.cif

e-77-00875-sup1.cif (416.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup2.hkl

e-77-00875-Isup2.hkl (319.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup3.cdx

CCDC reference: 2101472

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES