Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0257080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257080

Conflict driven displacement and child health: Evidence based on mother’s nationality from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

Manzoor Ahmad Malik 1, Saddaf Naaz Akhtar 2,*, Rania Ali Albsoul 3, Muhammad Ahmed Alshyyab 4
Editor: Srinivas Goli5
PMCID: PMC8423276  PMID: 34492080

Abstract

Introduction

Armed conflicts result in greater vulnerability and socioeconomic inequality of populations besides risking their health and well-being. Conflict intensifies the health needs and risks the life and well-being of individuals at large through displacement. Therefore, our study aims to apprise the interventions to which children under-five living in Jordan are especially at risk for acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, and fever in the conflict circumstances.

Materials and methods

Secondary data analysis is used in the present study. We used a weighted sample of around 9650 children from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey (JPFHS), 2017–18. Bivariate analysis including prevalence rates were used to examine the distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of children. The study has also used multinomial logistic regression model, in order to evaluate the variations in the probability of nationality of under-five children living in Jordan.

Results

“Syrian nationalist” children have a higher relative risk of ARI (RRR = 1.19, [1.08, 1.32]), and “Other-nationalist” children have two times greater risk of ARI compared to “Jordanian children.” The relative risk of diarrhea is lower among “Syrian nationalist” and “Other-nationalist” children compared to “Jordanian children.” Children belong “Other-nationalist” are found to be less relative risk of fever (RRR = 0.9, [0.80, 1.01]) than “Jordanian children.”

Conclusions

Our study concludes that conflict-driven displacement has an immediate effect on child health through access, availability, and affordability of health care services, resulting in more significant health care risks. However, sufficient investment is required to address such adversities that affect the health care system due to uneven demand as experienced by the Jordanian health care system. Thus, collaborative efforts through global partners can play a significant role in the countries facing the challenges of managing these health care emergencies.

Introduction

Armed conflicts result in greater vulnerability and socioeconomic inequality of populations besides risking their health and well-being. The inevitable impact of armed conflict results in severe public health challenges, mediated by displacement and collapse the health care system [1,2]. Throughout the Conflict impacts socioeconomic and health care outcomes through direct and indirect effects, like violence, injuries, forced labor, exploitation, and unlawful detention [3]. Due to conflict-driven displacement, populations at risk face inadequate health services apart from losing their livelihood and facing the challenges of socioeconomic marginalization [4]. Even though removal lowers their risk of death due to violence, the lack of health care services and proper attention from health care service providers marks them uncovered against health risks [5]. The challenges further evolve through availability, affordability, and accessibility of these health care services in the displaced locations [6,7].

Conflict intensifies the health needs and risks the life and well-being of individuals at large through displacement. Populations displaced to other countries, face severe challenges of inadequate health care due to the loss of their livelihood and shelter [8]. Conflict forces them to displace and take refuge in the areas, where they mostly remain concentrated in refugee camps and unmarked regions [9]. These places are already fragile, and the lack of basic amenities keeps them exposed to socioeconomic and health care vulnerabilities [10]. One of the worst challenges they face is acceptance from the host country, which further deteriorates their well-being [11,12] Other possible challenges evolve, through unexpected demand, lack of facilities in the host country, and the kind of health care provision [13]. Conflict further increases the risk of nutritional challenges, mental health, sexual abuse, and other health-related challenges that likely increase the disease burden [1416]. Thus, conflicts driven displacement profoundly impacts the population’s health and well-being, especially vulnerable groups like women, children, and the elderly.

Children are the most susceptible group that suffers from any calamity, be it natural or human made. Children face severe consequences due to conflict, ranging from their health, education, and material welfare. Conflict-driven displacement impact children in terms of diseases and loss of life that are mostly avoidable [17]. With 250 million children live in the world’s most vulnerable zones at risk of both life loss and basic health care services [18]. Children are directly exposed to health risks through conflict with under-five aged at most [19]. Children suffer both directly and indirectly to the effects of conflict than the other vulnerable groups like women and elderly [20]. Conflict affects children through preventable diseases, lack of basic necessities, sexual abuse and proper family care [21]. Conflict driven displacement further enhances the greater inequality of health among children and their physical growth [22]. Previous studies have found that children, especially at their early age, are highly vulnerable to various morbidity outcomes, malnutrition, and mental health challenges, and these outcomes further complicate when they face the conflict-driven displacement and migrant atmosphere [2325].

Theoretical construct

Syria is one of the worst affected countries in recent times due to conflict. According to estimates, around 8.8 million people were displaced due to the ongoing conflict, with one-quarter of these people entering into their neighbouring countries through international borders [26]. One of the most affected populations of these displaced people is under-five children. According to estimates, around 48 percent of the displaced people are under 18 years of age, and approximately five in every registered refugee are children of under-five age [26]. The Fig 1 below shows the estimates of people displaced due to conflict in Syria.

Fig 1. Percentage of Syrian refugees by age-groups and sex in Jordan by September 2020.

Fig 1

Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Owing to the fact that the conflict in the region remains pounding. Nearly 4 out of every 5 refugees lives in countries neighboring their countries of origin [26]. Since the conflict began in Syria in 2011, Jordan has shouldered the impact of a massive influx of Syrian refugees, and currently, Syrian refugees constitute around 10 percent of Jordan’s population, which has placed immense pressure on the country’s over-stretched resources at one of the most difficult economic periods in its history [27]. Nearly 78,000 Syrian refugees reside in rows of assembled shelters in Jordan [27]. Furthermore, Jordan has the second-highest share of refugees per capita of GDP [28], which puts immense pressure on the Jordanian health care system to suffice the displaced people’s needs apart from its population. Since the displaced people are prone to a lack of financial resources and mainly depend on out-of-pocket expenditures to bear the health care costs. This has exerted extra pressure on Jordanian health care systems to meet the unprecedented demand and provide adequate health resources to these displaced populations [29]. Furthermore, since 70 percent of refugees reside in Jordanian communities, this makes it difficult for the health care system to differentiate or exclude the refugees [30]. Although Jordan is known for its exceptional health care system, with higher GDP spending of around 7.2 percent on health care [31]. It is one of the most updated health care systems in the Arab world functioning through multiple organs, including public and private institutions. [32,33]. But the increasing political instability and cross-border conflict have affected it on a grander scale [34].

Jordan is politically vulnerable due to its resource impoverishment, externally oriented rentier economy, limited internal revenue sources, and extreme population growth [35]. Syrian conflict, Jordan has become increasingly wary of its growing Syrian populations [35]. Jordan provides sufficient health care access to people from Syria and other countries [36], but despite that, there is a gap in accessing healthcare services among many Syrian refugees in Jordan due to the barriers, such as not possessing the civil documentation or having the means to pay out-of-pocket expenditures for accessing adequate health care services [29]. With already poor living conditions, the Syrians are thus more susceptible to disease outbreaks and suffer from a lack of health care services [36]. Displacement through conflict is an increasing challenge and puts large populations at risk, especially children since conflict-driven displacement has long and short-term health effects [37]. It also affects the host country’s health care system with exerted demand due to the influx of displaced populations. Therefore, given the challenge, it is key to amplify the policy gaps and reflect the impact of conflict on health care outcomes. This study further aims to apprise interventions to which children under five are especially at risk for acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, and fever in the conflict circumstances. Moreover, there is a dearth of research in this context in the literature, which can reflect the linkages and examine children’s health care scenarios due to conflict-driven displacement, especially in the Arab world. Thus, based on the above theoretical connotation, we used the JPFHS data on children and identified them based on mother’s nationality to examine the child health inequality among the children, particularly those displaced from the neighboring countries, especially Syria in Jordan, due to conflict.

Materials and methods

Data source and survey description

This study is based on demographic health survey of Jordan. We used the Jordan Population and Family Health Survey (JPFHS) which has been implemented by the Department of Statistics (DOS) from early October 2017 to January 2018 [38]. The JPFHS (2017–18) is the seventh to be conducted in Jordan and follows the 1990, 1997, 2002, 2007, 2009, and 2012 JPFHS surveys. The survey provides valuable information on trends in key demographic and health indicators over time. The collected information is intended to assist policymakers and program managers in evaluating and designing programs and strategies for improving the health of the country’s population. Additionally, for the first time in Jordan, the 2017–18 JPFHS included a male survey. The survey collected information on women’s basic demographic and social characteristics, on their knowledge and use of family planning methods, and on their knowledge and attitudes towards HIV and other sexually transmitted infections [38]. For conducting this study, we used a weighted sample of around 9650 children. As this study utilized secondary data from the JPFHS, it was exempted from the institutional review board evaluation.

Outcome variable

The main dependent variable in the study is nationality of mother. This is the only variable that can provide information about the refugees in the survey. Although it may not be the case that every mother with other nationality is a refugee in Jordan, but based on previous literature [3941], it is clear that most mothers with other and Syrian nationality are refugees settling in Jordan due to the ongoing conflict in Syria and neighboring countries of Jordan. Therefore, we used the mother’s nationality to differentiate the health outcomes of children belonging to mothers with a different nationality. In questionnaire it has been asked to the respondent that” What is your nationality?” The nationality of mother has been categorized into three categories: Jordanian, Syrian and other-nationalists (includes Egyptian, Iraqi, other Arab nationalities and non-Arab nationalities).

Explanatory variables

Socio-economic factors and demographics factors are: Age of child, sex of child, place of residence, regions, wealth index, mothers’ education, fathers’ education, fathers’ working status, mothers’ working status, birth order, number of living children, health services factors (like health card and received BCG vaccine), wash and hygiene factors (like-sources of water supply, clean water, toilet facilities), environmental factors (like fuel type, mother’s smoking cigarette, mothers’ smoking water).

Data analysis

Bivariate analysis including prevalence rates were used to examine the distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of children. The study explores the different morbidity outcomes of children like acute respiratory infections (ARI), diarrhea and fever by three nationalities. The independent variables include ARI fever and Diarrhea apart from the other socio-economic and demographic characteristics of children and mother.

The study has used multinomial logistic regression model to evaluate the health risks based on the mother’s nationality of under-five children living in Jordan. The relative risk ratios have been determined by using multinomial logistic regression for the given independent variables for each category of the nationality of under-five children living in Jordan (dependent variable). The regression model is then fitted to examine the association between a set of independent variables such as prevalence of ARI, diarrhea, fever, and other socio-economic variables (Mothers’ education, wealth index, place of residence and region, explaining the likelihood of the Syrian nationality of under-five children living in Jordan. The equation fitted to the data are as follows:

lnP(yi=m)P(yi=l)=α+k=1Kβxmxik=zmi

The dependent variable has been categorized into three categories (Jordanian, Syrian and Other-nationalists) and represented by m as mentioned in the above equation. The main reason of selecting this as a dependent variable was to analyze the difference in health outcomes of the children belonging to Syria, Jordan and other nations. Hence, there is need to calculate for m − 1, one for each category relative to the reference category in order to illustrate the probability of the prevalence of ARI, diarrhea & fever, and other socio-economic variables (Mothers’ education, wealth index, place of residence and regions). For the Others nationality category of the dependent variable, the derived equation is then estimated are given as follows:

Pyi=m=exp(zmi)1+h=2Mexp(zhi)

The Jordanian nationality of under-five children living in Jordan has been selected as the comparison category. The model parameter estimates and the Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) for the multinomial logit model is that for a unit change in the predictor variable, the logit of outcome m relative to the reference group is expected to change by its respective parameter estimate given that the variables in the model are held constant [42,43]. All analyses were conducted using STATA 14.0.

Results

Table 1 presents the percentage of under-five children living in Jordan with different nationalities by background characteristics (2017–18). The background characteristics include the age of under-five children (in months), sex, place of residence, regions, wealth index, mother’s education, father’s education, father’s working status, mother’s working status, birth order, and the number of children living.

Table 1. Background characteristics by nationalities among under-five children in Jordan, 2017–18.

Background Jordanian Syrian Others
Age
Less than 6 months 84.67 11.79 3.53
6–11 months 85.61 11.79 2.61
12–23 months 83.42 13.02 3.56
24–35 months 84 13.24 2.76
36–47 months 83.18 11.55 5.27
48–60 months 83.23 12.32 4.44
Sex
Male 83.74 12.12 4.14
Female 83.88 12.64 3.48
Place of Residence
Urban 82.33 13.52 4.14
Rural 95.11 3.56 1.33
Regions
North 78.94 18.85 2.21
Central 84.82 10.03 5.15
South 94.99 3.6 1.41
Wealth Index
Poorest 62.9 32.84 4.26
Poorer 86.36 9.37 4.27
Middle 94.09 3.65 2.25
Richer 95.16 2.3 2.54
Richest 91.25 1.65 7.1
Mothers’ Education
No Education 49.3 38.62 12.09
Primary 37.48 53.6 8.91
Secondary 83.12 13.56 3.32
Higher 94.7 2.08 3.22
Fathers’ Education
No Education 67.14 26.55 6.3
Primary 53.59 42.51 3.9
Secondary 85.93 10.98 3.09
Higher 90.8 4.01 5.2
Don’t know 93.63 6.37 0
Fathers’ Working Status
Not Working 71.38 22.54 6.08
Working 85.82 10.73 3.45
Mothers’ Working Status
Not Working 82.16 13.9 3.94
Working 95.22 1.77 3.01
Birth Order
<2 84.39 11.11 4.5
3–5 84.9 11.78 3.32
6+ 75.84 21.43 2.73
Number of children living
Single 84.82 9.75 5.43
Three 85.2 11.29 3.5
More than three 81.62 14.79 3.58

Source: Authors’ estimation using JPFHS (2017–18).

Table 2 presents the percentage and sample distribution of ARI, diarrhea, and fever among under-five children by nationalities in JPFHS (2017–18). The Jordanian nationality constitutes 8065 under-five children; Syrian nationality includes 1191 under-five children and Other-nationality 368 under-five children. The percentage of ARI and fever among other nationalist and Syrian under-five children are found to be higher than Jordanian under-five children. While in the case of Diarrhea, Jordanian under-five children are found to be 1% greater than Syrian under-five children.

Table 2. Sample size distribution of acute respiratory infection, diarrhea and fever by nationalities among under-five children in Jordan, 2017–18.

Nationality ARI Diarrhea Fever Total Samplea
Jordanian 5.76 9.8 13.01 8065
Syrian 6.45 8.76 13.57 1191
Other 10.13 8.49 13.01 368
Total 6.02 9.62 13.09 9623

aUnweighted total sample of Children by mother’s nationality.

Source: Authors’ estimation using JPFHS (2017–18).

Table 3 presents the prevalence of acute respiratory infection, diarrhea, and fever by socioeconomic characteristics among under-five children in Jordan, 2017–18. Our study found that the prevalence rate of ARI among Other-nationalist (9.56%) and Syrian (6.67%) under-five children are found to be higher than Jordanian (5.69%) children in urban areas. The prevalence rate of ARI among all nationalist’s under-five children in rural areas are seen to be lower than urban children. Mother with no education has the lowest prevalence rate of ARI among Jordanians (1.17%) and Syrian (1.88%). Mother with higher education has high prevalence rates among Other-nationalist (13.25%) and Syrian (7.25%). Wealthier children have the highest ARI prevalence rate, with 19.92% among other-nationalists than Jordanian and Syrian. Syrian and Other-nationalist female children have a greater prevalence of ARI than male children, but in the case of Jordanian male has a higher prevalence rate of ARI than female. Syrian and Jordanian children aged 6–11 months are positively affected with ARI, but Other-nationalist children aged 12–23 months have the highest prevalence rate. Jordanian and Syrian children whose father and mother are working are positively affected by ARI than non-working parents. The lowest prevalence is observed in the North Region, where Jordanian children have 4.86%, Syrian children have 4.79%, and Other-nationalist has 5.41%. In contrast, the highest observed in the central part for Jordanian and Syrian but in the South region, Other-nationalist.

Table 3. Prevalence of acute respiratory infection, diarrhea and fever by socioeconomic characteristics among under-five children in Jordan, 2017–18.

Socioeconomic characteristics ARI Diarrhea Fever
Jordanian Syrian Others Jordanian Syrian Others Jordanian Syrian Others
Place of Residence
Urban 5.69 6.67 9.56 9.81 8.76 8.06 12.72 13.59 13.34
Rural 6.26 0 23.57 9.73 8.56 18.53 14.86 13.2 21.02
Mothers’ Education
No Education 1.17 1.88 7.12 5.75 4.08 0 4.64 7.2 11.32
Primary 5.94 6.43 1.89 11.3 8.65 3.55 11.14 13.94 13.93
Secondary 6.11 6.77 11.26 10.04 9.56 13.57 14.17 13.81 15.72
Higher 5.44 7.25 13.25 9.49 5.93 5.26 11.92 14.77 11.08
Wealth Index
Poorest 5.76 5.47 15.72 11.91 8.46 7.69 13.79 12.99 10
Poorer 6.86 8.9 7.4 9.31 8.17 16.01 14.84 17.52 22.14
Middle 5.05 15.9 0 9.51 21.21 2.27 13.82 12.66 11.64
Richer 5.63 0 19.92 8.78 0 2.16 10.06 0 18.01
Richest 5.12 0 6.05 9.55 0 7.14 10.97 28.88 4.63
Sex
Male 6.25 6.39 6.65 9.43 8.35 4.04 13.87 15.22 12.86
Female 5.24 6.5 14.54 10.19 9.16 14.12 12.07 11.93 14.65
Age
Less than 6 months 3.73 3.06 2.84 12.87 22.75 16.57 7.39 8.73 16.12
6–11 months 8.88 9.03 14.09 20.58 14.59 18.93 20.14 16.61 23
12–23 months 6.5 6.12 15.93 13.13 13.92 5.55 18.11 22.57 24.66
24–35 months 5.01 8.19 15.71 8.33 5.72 8.41 12.62 12.71 14.1
36–47 months 6.81 7.74 10.28 5.66 4.66 6.94 13.23 14.09 7.53
48–60 months 4.63 4.67 5.03 5.43 1.16 6.05 8.71 7.61 9.43
Fathers’ Working Status
Not Working 3.71 4.55 0 11.34 7.23 2.15 13.81 7.05 1.62
Working 6.04 7.08 13.01 9.59 9.27 10.29 12.89 15.76 16.66
Mothers’ Working Status
Not Working 5.64 6.41 11.26 9.3 8.65 8.61 13.18 13.38 13.78
Working 6.48 8.33 0 12.75 14.68 7.42 11.94 24.1 12.04
Region
North 4.86 4.79 5.41 9.33 9.15 7.73 13.16 13.48 21.51
Central 6.63 8.35 11.14 10.36 8.11 8.49 13.12 13.74 11.24
South 3.66 5.69 13.79 8.09 12.28 12.82 11.84 12.7 21.54
Total 5.76 6.45 10.13 9.8 8.76 8.49 13 13.57 13.66

Source: Authors’ estimation using JPFHS (2017–18).

Similarly, the prevalence of diarrhea is higher among urban Jordanian and Syrian than rural, but children who belong to rural Other-nationalist have higher than urban. Mother with secondary education has a higher prevalence rate among Other-nationalist (13.57%). Jordanian children are highly infected with diarrhea than Syrian children concerning their mother’s education level. Simultaneously, female children are found to have greater diarrhea prevalence among all nationalists than male children. Syrian children age less than six months have the highest prevalence rate, with 22.75%. Jordanian children whose father is not working are observed to have the highest prevalence rate of 11.34%, while the Syrian working mothers have the highest prevalence rate, with 14.68%. Syrian and Other-nationalist children belong to the southern region are highly infected with diarrhea.

Despite that, rural Jordanian and ‘Other-nationalist’ children have a high prevalence of fever than urban children. Still, urban Syrian children are more likely to have a higher prevalence of fever than rural. Children whose mothers have secondary education levels belong to ‘Other-nationalist’ & Jordanian, and children whose mothers with higher education of ‘Syrian nationalists’ are positively affected by fever. The highest prevalence of fever is found among Syrian and Jordanian male children than female. Children age 12–23 months have a high prevalence of fever. Children whose father is working have a higher fever prevalence than non-working fathers among both Syrian and Other-nationalist. Syrian children whose mother are working has the highest prevalence rate, with 24.1%. The southern region of Jordan has the highest prevalence, where the lowest is seen in the Central part among other nationalist children.

Table 4 presents the prevalence of acute respiratory infection, diarrhea, and fever by demographic, health, hygiene, and environmental characteristics among under-five children living in Jordan, 2017–18. The highest prevalence of ARI is observed among ‘Other-nationalist’ children with 14.2% and the lowest among Jordanians with birth order more than six. A single child is positively affected by ARI among Jordanian and Other-nationalist. Children who have a health card and received the BCG vaccine are positively affected by ARI among all nationalists. ‘Other-nationalist’ children who consume bottled water have a high prevalence of ARI. Jordanian children whose mother has a smoking habit have high ARI prevalence compared to Syrian and Other nationalists.

Table 4. Prevalence of acute respiratory infection, diarrhea and fever by demographic, health, hygiene and environmental characteristics among under-five children in Jordan, 2017–18.

Characteristics ARI Diarrhea Fever
Jordanian Syrian Others Jordanian Syrian Others Jordanian Syrian Others
Demographic factors
Birth Order
<2 5.62 6.66 14.2 9.95 12.18 9.06 12.49 12.14 15.85
3–5 6.29 7.04 5.3 9.52 5.58 8.52 13.15 13.18 12.73
6+ 3.82 4.37 3.48 10.41 7.87 3.42 15.11 18.36 2.19
Number of children living
Single 6.3 5.35 24.65 15.07 22.67 10.95 14.88 15.16 18.58
Three 6.2 6.46 8.21 9.31 7.97 10.36 13.27 11.92 16.19
More than three 4.97 6.72 3.87 8.33 5.94 4.65 11.89 14.76 8.12
Health services
Health card
No 5.41 0.6 0 4.64 10.05 2.37 5.13 11.39 0
Yes 5.88 7.15 13.38 12.98 12.94 11.01 14.83 15.92 19.6
Received BCG
No 4.64 1.51 0 10.87 11.84 0.78 9.54 14.49 12.51
Yes 5.99 7.45 14.74 12.91 12.88 12.12 15.04 15.79 19.83
Wash and hygiene
Sources of water
Piped 4.68 7.04 2.8 9.04 8.47 9.04 11.04 11.9 9.9
Bottle 6.66 6.41 23.26 10.06 9.68 10.06 14.91 16.74 20.25
Others 3.37 6.14 13.09 12.5 7.41 12.5 13.83 12.34 10.65
Plain Water
No 3.93 2.63 1.34 9.81 5.95 2.86 6.44 5.05 7.91
Yes 6.31 6.19 12.73 11.91 12.77 11.17 14.52 15.63 21.53
Toilet Facilities
No 5.38 6.3 9.5 9.61 8.34 7.56 12.66 13.09 13.35
Yes 8.82 10.67 14.9 10.02 14.29 31.6 18.48 22.69 18.72
Environment Factors
Fuel type
Smokeless 5.44 6.7 9.57 9.61 8.78 7.86 12.77 13.82 13.42
Smoke 0 5.77 0 15.3 31.09 0 0 43.74 0
Mothers’ Cigarette
No 5.75 6.44 10.94 9.82 8.84 7.07 13.17 13.51 14.74
Yes 5.91 6.62 0 9.42 7.53 26.23 10.57 14.58 0.97
Mother Smoking water
No 5.5 6.63 8.89 9.51 8.87 8.04 12.82 13.72 13.9
Yes 10.18 0.69 29.7 14.54 5.39 15.58 15.92 8.94 10.19

Source: Authors’ estimation using JPFHS (2017–18).

However, the highest prevalence of diarrhea is observed among Syrian (12.18%) with birth order less than two, and the lowest is observed among ‘Other-nationalist’ (3.42%) with birth order more than six. Single Syrian children are positively affected by diarrhea, with 22.67%. Children who have health cards and received the BCG vaccine are positively affected by diarrhea among all nationalists. Other sources of water supply among Jordanian and ‘Other-nationalist’ children have a high prevalence of diarrhea. Syrian children who have plain water supply are highly infected with diarrheal diseases. Around 31.6% of ‘Other-nationalist’ children are positively affected by the diarrheal disease, which has toilet facilities. The high prevalence is observed among Syrian children, with approximately 31% who use smoke fuel. ‘Other-nationalist’ children whose mother has a smoking cigarette and smoking water habit have a high prevalence rate of diarrhea.

Similarly, the highest prevalence of fever is observed among Syrian (18.36%) whose birth order is more than six. Single children and children with health cards and received BCG are positively affected by fever in all nationalist groups. Other-nationalist children who consume water by bottles and have plain water supply have a high prevalence of fever. Syrian children who have toilet facilities are highly infected with fever. A high prevalence of fever is observed among Syrian children, with around 43.74% who use smoke fuel. Syrian and ‘Other-nationalist’ children whose mother has smoking cigarette habit are more likely to be affected by fever. Jordanian children whose mother has smoking water habits are positively affected by fever.

Table 5 presents multinomial logistic regression applied to determine the risk factors associated with under-five children living in Jordan (Jordanian, Syrian, and Other-nationalist) by its socioeconomic characteristics in 2017–18. ‘Syrian nationalist’ children have a higher relative risk of ARI (RRR = 1.19, [1.08, 1.32]), and ‘Other-nationalist’ children have two times greater risk of ARI compared to ‘Jordanian children.’ The relative risk of diarrhea is lower among ‘Syrian nationalist’ and ‘Other-nationalist’ children compared to ‘Jordanian children.’ Children belong ‘Other-nationalist’ are found to be less relative risk of fever (RRR = 0.9, [0.80, 1.01]) than ‘Jordanian children.’

Table 5. Multinomial regression results of nationalities showing relative risk ratio among under-five children in Jordan (2017–18) by its diseases and socioeconomic characteristics.

Diseases and Socioeconomic characteristics Syrian Other-Nationalist
RRR Confidence Interval RRR Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Lower Upper
ARI
No®
Yes 1.19*** 1.08 1.32 2.16*** 1.90 2.45
Diarrhea
No®
Yes 0.77*** 0.71 0.84 0.87** 0.76 0.98
Fever
No®
Yes 1.00 0.93 1.08 0.90* 0.80 1.01
Place of Residence
Urban®
Rural 0.16*** 0.15 0.18 0.26*** 0.22 0.31
Mothers’ Education
No Education®
Primary 1.97*** 1.73 2.25 1.20* 0.97 1.47
Secondary 0.29*** 0.26 0.33 0.22*** 0.18 0.27
Higher 0.07*** 0.06 0.08 0.21*** 0.17 0.25
Wealth Index
Poorest®
Poorer 0.32*** 0.30 0.33 0.90** 0.82 0.99
Middle 0.12*** 0.11 0.13 0.45*** 0.40 0.50
Richer 0.10*** 0.09 0.11 0.50*** 0.44 0.56
Richest 0.10*** 0.09 0.12 1.16** 1.03 1.30
Regions
North®
Central 0.53*** 0.51 0.56 1.12*** 1.06 1.19
South 4.29*** 3.74 4.93 0.20*** 0.16 0.24

***p<0.01,

**p<0.05,

*p<0.1;

®-Reference category;

ARI- acute respiratory infection.

Source: Authors’ estimation using JPFHS (2017–18).

Comparing to urban children, rural children’s relative risk ratio (RRR) of ‘Syrian nationalist’ is (RRR = 0.16, [0.15, 0.18]) and ‘Other-nationalist’ (RRR = 0.26, [0.22, 0.31]) is less likely to be at risk. However, we found that the mother’s education positively affects the nationalist group in Jordan. Though, the RRR among children whose mother has primary education is (RRR = 1.97, [1.73, 2.25]) for ‘Syrian nationalist’ and (RRR = 1.2, [0.97, 1.47]) for ‘Other-nationalist’ are higher compared to mother with no education. Similarly, children whose mother have secondary education (RRR = 0.29, [0.26, 0.33]) & higher education (RRR = 0.07, [0.06, 0.08]) for ‘Syrian nationalist’ and secondary education (RRR = 0.29, [0.26, 0.33]) & higher education (RRR = 0.21, [0.18, 0.25]) for ‘Other-nationalist’ have lesser relative risk compared to mother with no education. Compared to the poorest children, all wealth index categories have lower relative risk ration for ‘Syrian nationalist’ children. At the same time, the richest children who belong to the ‘Other-nationalist’ have higher relative-risk (RRR = 1.16, [1.03, 1.3]) compared to the poorest children. Further, the result shows that ‘Syrian nationalist’ children have four times more relative risk residing in the Southern region and less relative risk (RRR = 0.52, [0.51, 0.56]) residing in the Central region than compared to the Northern region of Jordan. Despite that, the RRR among ‘Other-nationalist’ children is (RRR = 1.12, [1.06, 1.19]) for Central region and (RRR = 0.2, [0.16, 0.24]) for Southern region compared to the Northern region of Jordan.

Discussion

The aim of this paper was to investigate the impact of conflict due to displacement on health care outcomes among children under-five years of age. We examined the health outcomes for children of mothers belonging to various nationalities in Jordan. Given that Jordan’s health system faces an inevitable challenge in meeting the unpredictable demand on healthcare services due refugee influx from its neighboring countries [44], we examined set of health outcomes namely: diarrhea, ARI and fever among under-five children in Jordan based on their mother’s nationality.

We found that health outcomes are asymmetric among the children of different nationalities, with children from Jordan performing better in outcomes like ARI and fever. This may be due to Jordanian mothers have better access to healthcare facilities as compared to mothers of other nationalities displaced due to conflict which may affect the health outcomes of their children. These findings are consistent with the earlier studies that reported that displaced children are at greater risk in terms of health outcomes and provision of health care services [45]. Despite the fact that Jordan has one of the most modern healthcare infrastructures in the Middle East countries [46], children mostly coming into Jordan due to conflict in their own countries face the challenges of access to health care services and are associated with more significant health risks as shown by our results. This has been also witnessed in earlier studies, where children from other nationalities were found to be at greater risk than the Jordanian children [47]. One other study revealed that the Jordan region’s political situation associated with the war made it more challenging to study child health issues, especially among the refugee populations who have minimal information about child health and are more vulnerable to health risks [48].

While examining the health risks associated with children belonging to different nationalities in Jordan, we found an ample evidence of health inequality among the children with Syrian and other nationalities, particularly in ARI and Fever. Though the diarrhea was marginally higher among the Jordanian children due to poor household sanitary conditions and adequacy of water facilities, especially among the poor households in Jordan’s rural areas Furthermore, Jordan is one of the scariest countries in terms of freshwater, which increases the likelihood of poor sanitation and increases diarrheal diseases risk [49]. However, given the large number of refugees in urban areas’ sanitation programs and sewage networks have been implemented among the refugees’ concentrated camps over time, which might reduce diarrheal risk among the children of other nationalities [50].

The increasing risk of health outcomes like ARI and fever among children has much to do with individuals’ socio-economic levels and well-being [51]. People coming through displacement mainly have no or low access to healthcare and lack basic health care facilities. Apart from that, they are at greater risk of contracting the disease outbreaks due to poor amenities and living arrangements as found in previous literature [52,53]. Another possible reason for the lack of access to healthcare services is being not registered with the local health care system to receive benefits. Our results suggest that, children belonging to these nationalities are at a greater risk both in terms of exposure to diseases and receiving the benefits from local health care services.

Prior studies in this filed reveal that more significant inequities are well reflected in access to services among the Syrian and other nationalities than the Jordanian children [54]. This study also found the same while using mother’s nationality as a proximity for displaced people in Jordan using the data from JPFHS. Thus, additional studies are needed to identify the health care challenges among children in Jordan especially who belong to Syrian and other nationalities. Similarly understanding the health risks and other possible challenges associated with children belonging to Syrian and Other nationalities living in Jordan, through some primary surveys can be also significant to understand the health care inequality among this group. Conflict negatively impacts health outcomes. Though public health research in terms of conflict is limited due to multiple challenges including consistent life threats, security concerns, and movement restriction, apart from the fragile health care system and lack of sufficient data in this context. Importantly, our findings emphasize that armed conflict is a public health problem, which has serious impact on vulnerable groups like children. Children exposed to any conflict or any other difficult situation are likely susceptible to health risks apart from the risk of exploitation and sexual abuse [55,56]. Therefore, significant attention needs to be put forth through policy measures to address these public health challenges, which may have potential impact on their health and wellbeing.

Limitations

This study is the first kind in an approach to link the conflict-driven displacement with child health outcomes based on secondary data. Although the sample size was significant enough, linking it with conflict was not explicit. There was no direct evidence of mothers belonging to different nationalities affected by conflict-driven displacement. This study provides useful insights into health outcomes facing vulnerable populations, but being cross-sectional does not imply the causal inference. The study further could not examine the mental health outcome, which is one of the children’s critical issues due to conflict.

Conclusions

The conflict has inevitable effects on the health and loss of life. Conflict puts vulnerable populations like children at greater risk through preventable diseases like diarrhea, ARI, and other chronic diseases as found in our study. Conflict-driven displacement has an immediate effect on child health through access, availability, and affordability of health care services, resulting in more significant health care risks. This likely risks the health and wellbeing of populations at risk especially among children, women and elderly. This study found a significant impact of displacement on the poor health outcomes among children like ARI and fever. Therefore, concerted action is required to safeguard the health needs and avert public health emergencies due to conflict driven displacement. Coordinated and effective measures are needed to provide the best health care services among the displaced populations to prevent health risks.

Moreover, investing in health is investing in peace; therefore, sufficient investment is required to address such adversities that affect the health care system due to uneven demand as experienced by the Jordanian health care system. Thus, collaborative efforts through global partners can play a significant role in the countries facing the challenges of managing these health care emergencies. To sum up, studies like this can also provide some useful insights into understanding how health strategies can be implied in this context to avoid adverse health outcomes and provide an inclusive health care approach for all health benefits.

Implications

There is a compelling need for research in this domain to be extended to understand the impact of conflict and displacement on child health and development. Although this study provides some basis for conducting such research based on secondary data, there is a dearth for future research in this context to address the public health issues of children and their mothers. Some of the key recommendations for both policymakers and researchers to address based on the linkages examined above in the study are as follow:

Practical implications

Researchers must examine the social determinants of physical health in conflict settings, which have a likely impact on children’s physical health and well-being. There is a need to design specific surveys in order to understand the problems at greater depth so that strategies adopted can be empirically tested. Effective intervention strategies should also be designed to prevent the avoidable mortality and morbidities affecting the children due to conflict-driven displacement. Designing appropriate health promotion programs is also worthwhile to enhance awareness regarding these diseases.

Policy implications

It is important to ensure that health care service provisions are accessible to all. There is a need to strengthen the coverage of health care services, emergency care services and ensure mobile care services among displaced populations. Health care assistance to the Jordanian government faces unprecedented demand and investment grants in health care services.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Additional information of the variables that have been categorized in the data analysis.

(DOCX)

Abbreviations

ARI

Acute respiratory infections

BCG

Bacille Calmette-Guerin

DHS

Demographic and health surveys

GDP

Gross domestic product

JPFHS

Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

RRR

Relative risk ratio

UNHCR

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Data Availability

The data analyzed are publicly available. https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-500.cfm.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

Decision Letter 0

Srinivas Goli

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

2 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-38398

Conflict driven displacement and child health: Evidence from Jordan

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Akhtar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Considering reviewers comments, I am going with a decision of Major revision 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 08 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Srinivas Goli, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about the eligibility criteria applied in your analysis; and please clarify how every variable was categorised.

3. Please amend your manuscript to include your abstract after the title page.

Additional Editor Comments:

Considering reviewers comments, I am going with a decision of Major revision

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Useful literature can be taken up in the discussion section. These papers discuss the risk factors for unexpected child death, sudden infant death and stillbirth in Jordan and the many issues raised regarding the health care system, high smoking rate and smoking restrictions, as well as cultural, economic and risk groups.

-Hamadneh S., Kassab M., Eaton A., Wilkinson A., Creedy D.K. (2020) Sudden Unexpected Infant Death. In: Laher I. (eds) Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74365-3_144-1

- Hamadneh S, Kassab M, Hamadneh J, Amarin Z. Sudden unexpected infant death in Jordan and the home environment. Pediat Int. 2016; 58(12):1333-1336.

- Khader Y, Batieha A, Khader A, Hamadneh S. (2018) Stillbirths in Jordan: rate, causes, and preventability, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Published online: 25 Sep 2018. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1517326

- Hamadneh S, Al-Shdayfat N, Al-Omari O, Hamadneh J, Bashtawi M, Alkhatib A, Amarneh B, Andre K, Willkinson A. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in the Middle East: An Exploration of the Literature on Rates, Risk Factors, High Risk Groups and Intervention Programs. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;10(4):199-204

- Hamadneh S. Sudden unexpected infant deaths investigation in the Middle East requiring further action· GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC). 2016;4(1): 53-56

Reviewer #2: The article is written in a clear and understandable language. The data is described as it is. However, (1) the discussion contradicts the result on diarrhea. The result shows that prevalence of diarrhea is higher in Jordanian children than Syrians and other nationalities. (2) The difference in health outcomes seems correlated to socio-economic indictors than nationality. The authors should focus the article on the socio-economic disparity between refugees and Jordanians affecting health of children. The nationality argument not supported well. (3) How does the ARI, diarrhea and fever data look like by nationality, when controlled for socio-economic variables? (4) What do the authors think is the reason for prevalence of diarrhea being higher in Jordanian children than in Syrians or other nationalities? I suggest including that routine immunization is free for all children under 5 in Jordan. However, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is not part of Jordan's routine immunization program. When it is introduced, it will be available for all children under 5, including refugees.

Reviewer #3: 1. It is a very important study on the health of the children under five having different nationalities, all residents of Jordan.

2. Please modify the title according to the objective of the study.

3. The objective of the study needs to be precisely restructured and focused.

4. The Abstract has to be written properly and concisely.

5. The Conclusion of the study has to be consistent with the study findings.

6. In Table 2, sample size has to be recalculated.

7. Please take out the wordings like PhD Scholar, only the PhD will suffice. What about the credentials of other coauthors, please mention.

8. The limitations of the study are nicely narrated.

9. Please make necessary corrections of grammar and restructuring the sentences.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Shereen Hamadneh

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0257080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257080.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Apr 2021

Title: Conflict driven displacement and child health inequality: Evidence based on mother’s nationality from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

Dear All,

We would like to thank you for these constructive, building and improvable comments on this manuscript that would improve the manuscript's substance and content. We considered each comments and clarification questions of the editor and reviewers on the manuscript thoroughly. Our point-by-point responses for each comment and questions are described in detailed on the following pages. Further, the details of changes were shown by track changes in the supplementary document attached. Once again, thank you for your valuable insights.

Editor’s comments

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Authors’ response: Dear Editor, Thank you for the suggestion. We have prepared the manuscript as per the PLOSONE’s style including file name.

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about the eligibility criteria applied in your analysis; and please clarify how every variable was categorised.

Authors’ response: Thank you. We have prepared the additional information about the outcome and explanatory variables used in the data analysis. This can be found in S1 Table. Kindly see the supporting information’s file.

3. Please amend your manuscript to include your abstract after the title page.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your valuable suggestion. We have included the abstract after the title page.

Reviewer #1

Comment: Useful literature can be taken up in the discussion section. These papers discuss the risk factors for unexpected child death, sudden infant death and stillbirth in Jordan and the many issues raised regarding the health care system, high smoking rate and smoking restrictions, as well as cultural, economic and risk groups.

Authors’ response: We have included literature as suggested by the reviewer in the discussion section. Thank you for the informative suggestion.

Reviewer #2

1. The discussion contradicts the result on diarrhea. The result shows that prevalence of diarrhea is higher in Jordanian children than Syrians and other nationalities.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your comments we have critically revised our discussion and made it consistent with the study findings in the revised draft, we kindly suggest you to go through the revised draft.

2. The difference in health outcomes seems correlated to socio-economic indictors than nationality. The authors should focus the article on the socio-economic disparity between refugees and Jordanians affecting health of children. The nationality argument not supported well.

Authors’ response: Thank you for highlighting the core issue of this paper. As we framed this study, we also have a similar concern, but our aim was to examine the possible health risk due to conflict-driven displacement despite having a good health system as in the case of Jordan, which has one of the best health care system accommodating millions of refugees in the world. So, we included nationality as an important factor in our study.

Secondly, since this was a study based on secondary data, without any direct evidence of the mother’s being likely from Syria. So, we derived a notion based on some earlier literature and theoretical construct to establish the link between conflict and child health outcomes via mother’s nationality.

Thirdly health outcomes had a strong correlation with the children’s nationality derived from their mother’s. However, socio-economic indicators were also correlated with child health outcomes, but since our theoretical notion was more about displacement, so that was the best proxy indicator available in the dataset to be undertaken. Furthermore, socio-economic disparities have been already examined as cited by our study, so we used nationality as a construct to study health outcomes.

Lastly, although, we could not find sufficient evidence to support the nationalities argument, except denoting it as proxy mainly derived from conflict-driven displacement. But we did mention it as a possible limitation in our study.

3. How does the ARI, diarrhea and fever data look like by nationality, when controlled for socio-economic variables?

Authors’ response: Thank you. The results were similar even after controlling them, we have already taken this into account while carrying our initial analysis, but since our goal was to study nationality as a likely factor based on the notion of conflict-driven displacement, so we used multinomial modelling to accommodate it, rather than control it as a potential predictor in the final analysis.

4. I suggest including that routine immunization is free for all children under 5 in Jordan. However, the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) is not part of Jordan's routine immunization program. When it is introduced, it will be available for all children under 5, including refugees.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have taken note of it in our revised manuscript.

Reviewer #3

1. It is a very important study on the health of the children under five having different nationalities, all residents of Jordan.

Authors’ response: Yes. It is.

2. Please modify the title according to the objective of the study.

Authors’ response: Since the focus was more on establishing a connotation of conflict with health outcomes, we felt it more catchy, but we have modified the title and made it more precise and problem-oriented.

3. The objective of the study needs to be precisely restructured and focused.

Authors’ response: Thank you. We have restructured it and made it more relevant with title and theoretical construct.

4. The Abstract has to be written properly and concisely.

Authors’ response: Thank you for the suggestion. The abstract has been concisely written. We would like you to see the revised manuscript.

5. The Conclusion of the study has to be consistent with the study findings.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your comment. We have revised the conclusion and made it consistent with the study findings.

6. In Table 2, sample size has to be recalculated.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your comment, we have recalculated the Table and attached the same in the updated version. We kindly suggest to see the revised supplementary document.

Nationality ARI Diarrhea Fever Total Sample*

Jordanian 5.76 9.8 13.01 8065

Syrian 6.45 8.76 13.57 1191

Other 10.13 8.49 13.01 368

Total 6.02 9.62 13.09 9623

*Unweighted total sample of Children by mother’s nationality

Source: Jordan Demographic and Health Surveys 2017-18.

7. Please take out the wordings like PhD Scholar, only the PhD will suffice. What about the credentials of other coauthors, please mention.

Authors’ response: Dear Reviewer, I have updated my personal details concisely. But the online submission system didn’t show the updated version.

And I am not able to edit the other coauthors credential because I am not getting such options to edit in the online submission system. But I have mentioned in the cover letter. Kindly see the cover letter.

8. The limitations of the study are nicely narrated.

Authors’ response: Thank you.

9. Please make necessary corrections of grammar and restructuring the sentences.

Authors’ response: Thank you for your kind suggestions. The necessary corrections of grammar and reconstruction of the sentences have been made clearly. We kindly request you to kindly see the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Srinivas Goli

18 Jun 2021

PONE-D-20-38398R1

Conflict driven displacement and child health inequality: Evidence based on mother’s nationality from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Akhtar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Reviewer 2 is still not happy with writing style of the manuscript, thus I am sending it back to you. Can you carefully give attention to reviewer 2 comments. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 02 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Srinivas Goli, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Reviewer 2 is still not happy with writing style of the manuscript, thus I am sending it back to you. Can you carefully give attention to reviewer 2 comments.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: It is possible to start the process of publishing. The researchers made the modifications identified in the review.

Reviewer #2: The topic of study is still relevant and important. However, I was not able to discern the man public health message from the data and discussions. The revised manuscript is even more confusing than the previous version. The results are not described and discussed in a meaningful and coherent way that makes sense in terms of their public health relevance. I could not understand, what the authors were trying to tell us. For instance,

"..results showed that Jordanian children whose mother has a smoking habit and Syrian children's mothers who do not smoke cigarettes have high ARI prevalence. Hence, our results clearly show that disease risk is greater

among the children of Syrian or any other nationality than the Jordanian."

The authors should have picked a few of the results, which they thought were most relevant to support the title of the article. In its current form, I do not see this article contains coherent and, from public health perspective, relevant new information that merits publication in PLOS.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Shereen Hamadneh

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0257080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257080.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


20 Aug 2021

Thank you for your critical evaluation. We have revised once again our paper and made the changes as highlighted by you. We have tried our best this time to make the results coherent with the final objective and title of the research paper.

Now I would like to come to your specific comments

Regarding the public health message of the paper.

While conceptualizing the paper, we tried to address some of the key aspects that are key in terms from public health perspective only. So, our aim was to make a comprehensive analysis of how health care system of a particular country gets affected by uncertain demands that arise mainly from the conflict in its neighbouring states. Whether the influx of refugees overshadows the health care services for natives. And with risk of vulnerability in health care outcomes how does these public health challenges impact the health of refugee’s especially vulnerable population like children. Therefore, based on the children sample determined by mother’s nationality we used the JDHS to analyze the health outcomes among the under-five children in Jordan including native Jordanian children and other nationality children.

We felt that the paper critically analyses the impact of conflict in health settings particularly in terms of provision of healthcare services and inequality in terms of access to health care. We therefore felt this an in important significant public health issues undertaken by the PLOSone in earlier research, that is why we opted for this journal, and felt that it will reach the wider audience given its strong implications in terms of health care access and provisions in children.

Regarding your results suggestion

Thank you for highlighting that we have already corrected it in our final revision.

I have hoped this revision of paper suits well and address the concerns, which you have pointed out. We will be really pleased if there is any other issue that we need to address in this paper. We would love to correct it before making it suitable for this publication.

Regards

Authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response.docx

Decision Letter 2

Srinivas Goli

24 Aug 2021

Conflict driven displacement and child health inequality: Evidence based on mother’s nationality from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

PONE-D-20-38398R2

Dear Dr. Akhtar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Srinivas Goli, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Authors have implemented the reviewers concerns. Thus, I am recommending this paper with minor suggestions.

1. Remove the word "inequality" from the paper title, as you really not estimating any inequality in the paper.

2. Under each table and figures authors wrote source is JDHS, please replace it as "Authors estimation using JDHS".

3. Replace the recommendation section heading as "Implications". Also replace sub-heading "for researchers" with "Practical implications", and "For Government" with "Policy implications". And, write this two sections as a coherent paragraph rather than bullet points.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Srinivas Goli

26 Aug 2021

PONE-D-20-38398R2

Conflict driven displacement and child health: Evidence based on mother’s nationality from Jordan Population and Family Health Survey

Dear Dr. Akhtar:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Srinivas Goli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Additional information of the variables that have been categorized in the data analysis.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data analyzed are publicly available. https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-500.cfm.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES