Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Leukoc Biol. 2021 Mar 8;110(5):917–925. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3AB0520-339RR

Neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles modulate the phenotype of naïve human neutrophils

Maya F Amjadi *,1, Benjamin S Avner *,†,1, Mallary C Greenlee-Wacker , Alexander R Horswill §, William M Nauseef *
PMCID: PMC8423865  NIHMSID: NIHMS1677188  PMID: 33682200

Abstract

Neutrophils (PMN) regulate inflammation in many ways, including communication with other immune cells via extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs released by human neutrophils activated with N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF) (PMN-fMLF EVs) had an outside-out orientation and contained functionally important neutrophil plasma membrane proteins, including flavocytochrome b558, and enzymatically active granule proteins, elastase and myeloperoxidase. Treatment of naïve PMN with PMN-fMLF EVs primed fMLF-stimulated NADPH oxidase activity, increased surface expression of the complement receptors CD11b/CD18 and CD35, the specific granule membrane protein CD66, and flavocytochrome b558, and promoted phagocytosis of serum-opsonized Staphylococcus aureus. The primed oxidase activity reflected increased surface expression of flavocytochrome b558 and phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox, two recognized mechanisms for oxidase priming. Taken together, these data demonstrate that stimulated PMN released EVs that altered the phenotype of naïve phagocytes by priming of the NADPH oxidase activity and augmenting phagocytosis, two responses that are integral to optimal PMN host defense.

Keywords: Inflammation, ectosomes, microparticles, priming, NADPH oxidase, phagocytosis

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1677188-f0001.jpg

Summary sentence:

Extracellular vesicles from fMLF-stimulated human neutrophils prime the NADPH oxidase and promote surface expression of functionally important membrane proteins and phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus.

Introduction

Neutrophils (polymorphonuclear phagocytes or PMN) are the first cellular responders to microbial invasion and drive an exuberant inflammatory response after migrating to a site of infection [1]. In addition to their well-established ability to phagocytose and directly kill microbes, PMN communicate with other immune cells, including other phagocytes, to participate in regulation of the immune response [2, 3]. By signaling to human macrophages to clear spent PMN from sites of infection and by secreting cytokines, PMN actively contribute to the orchestration of the acute inflammatory response in a variety of clinical settings, including infection [4]. In contrast to the extensive study of PMN-macrophage communication, data on signaling between PMN are limited.

Agonists such as N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF) induce PMN to release extracellular vesicles (EVs) [reviewed in [5]], which are particles enveloped in a lipid bilayer [6] and have the capacity to transfer mediators such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [7-9] and alter gene expression in target cells [10, 11]. Their biogenesis, structural features, and effects on target cells greatly depends on several variables, including the agonist prompting their generation, the functional state of the PMN during stimulation, and the environmental conditions [12, 13]. EVs from PMN act upon multiple cell types with varied responses [9, 14, 15] but, based upon their effects on phagocytes, are often characterized as anti-inflammatory. For example, EVs released from fMLF-stimulated human PMN do not increase IL-8 or TNFα secretion by human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDM) but instead prompt release of transforming growth factor β1. Furthermore, PMN-derived EVs block HMDM release of proinflammatory cytokines in response to endotoxin or zymosan [16, 17].

To explore how PMN-derived EVs might change the functional properties of naïve PMN, we recovered EVs from PMN stimulated with fMLF (PMN-fMLF EVs). PMN-fMLF EVs had an outside-side out orientation and possessed functionally important plasma membrane proteins and enzymatically active human neutrophil elastase (HNE) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Naïve PMN exposed to PMN-fMLF EVs exhibited priming of the NADPH oxidase, increased surface expression of several functionally important membrane proteins, and increased capacity to ingest opsonized Staphylococcus aureus. These data demonstrate that PMN-derived EVs can alter the phenotype of naïve PMN and thereby locally modify inflammation.

Methods

Reagents and antibodies:

PMN isolation used heparin from APP Pharmaceuticals LLC (Schaumburg, IL), dextran T500 from Pharmacosmos (Holbaek, Denmark), Ficoll-Hypague PLUS from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ), and endotoxin-free water and 0.9% sodium chloride from Baxter (Deerfield, IL). Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; HBSS+/+ and HBSS−/− signify with or without Ca++ and Mg++) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS; PBS+/+ and PBS−/− with above meanings) were purchased from Mediatech (Manassas, VA); PBS was adjusted to pH 7.4 prior to use. Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium without phenol red (with L-glutamine; 25 mM 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid [HEPES] added prior to use), HEPES (Gibco), and aldehyde/sulfate latex beads (4 μm diameter) were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA), as were fetal bovine serum and goat serum. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was from ICN Biomedicals Inc. (Aurora, OH). Human serum albumin (HSA) (25%) was purchased from Talecris Biotherapeutics (Raleigh, NC). Triton X-100 (Tx-100) was purchased from Fisher Biotech (Fair Lawn, NJ). Tryptic Soy Broth and tryptic soy agar were from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). fMLF, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), cytochrome C, Cell Vue Claret, oxalic acid, methyl cellulose, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Micro bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Assay kit was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Sodium phosphate buffer, paraformaldehyde, uranyl acetate, formvar-carbon coated EM grids were from Polysciences (Warrington, PA, USA), and TEM-grade glutaraldehyde was from Ted Pella (Redding, CA).

Antibodies used:

Goat anti-mouse fluorescein (FITC), anti-human CD63-phycoerythrin (PE), and anti-phospho-p47phox-SER345 were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti-human CD63-PE and anti-human CD35-FITC used for EV flow cytometry were from BioLegend (San Diego, CA). Anti-human CD11b-PE, anti-human CD35-FITC, and anti-human CD66b-FITC used for PMN flow cytometry were from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). HNE antibody, goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and goat anti-rabbit HRP were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Goat anti-mouse HRP was from Bio-Rad. Monospecific rabbit polyclonal antibody to human MPO was previously described [18]. Monoclonal antibodies 54.1 and 44.1, specific for gp91phox and p22phox [19] respectively, were provided by A. J. Jesaitis (Montana State University, Bozeman, MT). The murine monoclonal antibody 7D5 [20, 21] was purified in our lab by affinity chromatography (gamma bind sepharose) of spent culture media.

PMN isolation:

Human PMN were isolated from venous blood using dextran sedimentation and Hypaque-Ficoll density gradient separation [22] and used in experiments within 1 hour after isolation. Preparations were 92 to 95% PMN. Written consent was obtained from each volunteer blood product donor in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects at the University of Iowa.

Generation of PMN-fMLF EVs:

PMN were incubated in RPMI with 10−6M fMLF, for 20 min at 37°C. Intact PMN were removed by centrifugation at 4,000 × g and filtered (0.45 μm) supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 200,000 × g (SW-41 Ti for 55 min followed by SW-55 Ti for 30 min) to sediment and concentrate the EVs. EV samples were resuspended in a small volume (100-200 μL) of PBS−/−, aliquoted, flash frozen, and stored at −80°C until use. Before use in experiments, EVs were thawed on ice. EV protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay, and isolated EVs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), flow cytometry, and 0.05% Triton X-100 lysis as described in [23].

Activity assays of EV-associated enzymes:

Alkaline phosphatase activity was measured spectrophotometrically in EVs as described in [24]. Briefly, EVs with and without 2% Tx-100 were incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Alkaline phosphatase substrate p-nitrophenylphosphate (pNPP) was added to each sample and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance was read at 405nm using a SpectraMax Plus (Molecular Devices; San Jose, CA). HNE activity of EVs was measured as release of the fluorophore aminomethyl coumarin from a non-fluorescent substrate as described [25]. MPO activity was quantitated as chlorination of taurine in the presence of hydrogen peroxide as previously described [26], performed in triplicate for each replicate.

Immunoblotting of EVs:

PMN-fMLF EVs were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting. Murine monoclonal antibodies against gp91phox, p22phox, and HNE were used as primary antibodies. For detection of MPO, a high-titer monospecific rabbit primary antibody was used.

Superoxide anion measurement:

Activity of the NADPH oxidase was assessed by quantitating extracellular superoxide generation as superoxide dismutase-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome C. PMN in suspension were primed with vehicle (PBS−/−), 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plus 50 ng/mL LPS-binding protein (LBP), or PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL), by tumbling for 20 min at 37°C. PMN from each condition were then tumbled (1 × 106 cells/mL, in triplicate) for 20 min at 37°C in PBS+/+ with cytochrome C (100 μM), without or with fMLF (100 nM), and without or with SOD (50 μg/mL). PMN were pelleted at 500 × g, and supernatants diluted 1:4 before measuring absorbance at 550 nm using a Lamda35 spectrophotometer. The amount of superoxide anion was defined as SOD-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome C and calculated using the extinction coefficient of 21.1 mM−1cm−1 [27].

Flow cytometric assessment of plasma membrane protein expression in PMN:

PMN were primed for 40 min as described above. For detection of flavocytochrome b558, PMN (1 × 106 cells/aliquot, all conditions in duplicate) were incubated for 10 min in 10% pooled human serum in flow cytometry buffer consisting of PBS−/− with 2% goat serum and 0.5 mM EDTA for 10 min to block nonspecific binding of antibodies to PMN, and sequentially with 7D5 (50 μg/mL), a murine monoclonal antibody directed against an extracellular epitope of gp91phox [21] for 2h at 4°C, and a FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody for 30 min in the dark at RT, as done previously [28]. Membrane expression of flavocytochrome b558 on PMN was analyzed by flow cytometry as described above.

For detection of other surface proteins, PMN (1 × 106 cells/aliquot, all conditions in duplicate) were incubated in PBS+/+ with 4% fetal bovine serum and 2% nonfat dry milk for 10 min to block nonspecific binding, followed by treatment for 1h at 4°C with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies (FITC-CD35, PE-CD11b, FITC-CD66, or PE-CD63) at the concentrations recommended by the manufacturer. Staining of PMN membrane proteins was assessed by flow cytometry.

Immunoblotting for SER345 p47phox:

In parallel with measurements of priming of the NADPH oxidase, suspensions of PMN were solubilized, and proteins separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting. Blots were probed with an antibody against phospho-p47phox-SER345 and donkey anti-rabbit IgG-HRP followed by Pierce Femto Reagent. Images were acquired and quantitated using Odyssey (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE). Images of p47phox phosphorylated on SER345 were acquired and quantitated. Blots were subsequently stripped and probed with an antibody against p47phox that was generated in our laboratory [29]. Images of total p47phox were acquired and quantitated, and the amount of p47phox phosphorylated on SER345 under the specific experimental conditions was normalized for the total amount of p47phox immunoblotted. The fold changes of normalized p47phox-SER345 under various conditions was calculated relative to that in PBS-treated PMN.

Phagocytosis assay:

Phagocytosis of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing S.aureus was performed as previously described [30, 31]. For experiments using serum-opsonized bacteria, mid-logarithmic phase USA300 (LAC) S.aureus suspended in HBSS+/+ were tumbled for 20 min at 37°C at the desired concentration with 10% pooled human serum. Phagocytosis experiments were performed in the presence of 10 μM diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) in order to block activation of the PMN NADPH oxidase [32] and subsequent generation of HOCl, which would otherwise bleach the GFP [30]. DPI does not alter phagocytosis by PMN [30].

PMN in suspension were incubated together with PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL) at 37°C for 10 min, after which DPI and opsonized GFP-labelled USA300 LAC S.aureus were added at 0.5:1 or 2:1 multiplicity of infection (MOI). Suspensions were tumbled for 10 min at 37°C and then centrifuged at 500 × g to isolate PMN containing ingested S.aureus. All PMN flow cytometry was performed as done previously [31] and using an Accuri C6 Plus flow cytometer with 488 nm laser, gating PMN based on size and performing additional analysis using the FlowJo program (FlowJo LLC). The GFP signal was measured to determine both the percentage of PMN that had phagocytosed GFP-expressing S.aureus (% phagocytosis) and the geometric mean fluorescence of the GFP+ PMN (a reflection of the number of GFP-expressing S.aureus per PMN, and thus a proxy for the phagocytic index).

Statistical Analysis:

Statistical differences between two groups were calculated using a paired Student’s t test. Statistical differences between three or more groups were calculated using a one-way ANOVA and either a Tukey posttest for multiple comparisons or Dunnett posttest for comparisons with the control. Where applicable, the statistical tests and p-values of posttest analyses are included in the text or the figure legends.

Results and Discussion

PMN-fMLF EVs contain PMN plasma membrane proteins and PMN granule proteins

To establish that the material recovered from fMLF-stimulated PMN represented EVs, we used complementary analytical techniques to determine if it met criteria for EV established in current guidelines [6]. Following total protein quantification by BCA, material recovered by differential ultracentrifugation of supernatants from fMLF-stimulated PMN was visualized by TEM. Round and semi-round structures between 100-200 nm were visible (Figure 1A, upper panel) and were eliminated by treatment with 0.05% Triton X-100 (Figure 1A, lower panel), an appearance and behavior consistent with EVs [6]. Furthermore, the lipophilic dye CellVue Claret stained the structures conjugated to beads and Triton X-100 treatment significantly decreased staining (Figures 1B and C). In addition, we measured two proteins on CellVue+ beads: CD63, a tetraspanin protein found at the cell surface, in multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs), and in small EVs [33], and CD35, a protein found at the cell surface and in secretory vesicles. CD63 stained the majority of CellVue+ beads (90.0% ± 6.7%), whereas CD35 was only present on a subset of CellVue+ CD63+ beads and its staining was more variable (30.3% ± 13.5%, Figure 1D). Enrichment in tetraspanin protein CD63 and detergent-sensitivity of staining for membrane proteins, features characteristic of EVs, suggest that the vesicles represented fMLF-PMN EVs arising from both the plasma membrane and inward budding multi-vesicular bodies.

Figure 1. Characterization of PMN-fMLF EVs by TEM, flow cytometry, and immunoblot.

Figure 1.

PMN-fMLF EVs (top) and Tx 100-treated PMN-fMLF EVs (bottom) were positively-negatively stained and imaged using TEM at 10,000x magnification. Shown is a representative micrograph from three separate experiments (scale bar = 500 nm, A). In parallel, EVs were conjugated to beads, and stained with CellVue, anti-CD35-FITC, and anti-CD63-PE, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative dot plots of PMN-fMLF EVs (top) and Tx-100-treated PMN-fMLF EVs (bottom) are shown in (B) and quantification is shown in (C, n = 3). Data are expressed as % of CellVue+beads (right, paired Student’s t test, *** p < 0.001) and as % of CellVue+beads that were either single-positive for CD63 or double positive for CD63 and CD35 (bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 3). PMN-fMLF-EVs (3 μg for D, 4 μg for E, and 1.6 μg for F) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for (D) gp91phox and p22phox, (E) HNE, and (F) MPO. Arrows indicate the expected size of each protein on representative blots from five (D), four (E), or two (F) experiments. The unlabeled band on panel (F) is presumed to represent MPO-derived artifact associated with sample heating. Images have been cropped to contain the relevant lane. Both HNE and MPO were enzymatically active (see text).

In order to determine the orientation of the EVs, we assessed the latency of the integral membrane protein alkaline phosphatase. Intact PMN express alkaline phosphatase in two distinct locations, the plasma membrane and in secretory vesicles but with opposite orientations; in plasma membrane (and vesicles derived from plasma membrane), the catalytic domain of the enzyme is on the exterior, accessible to substrate, whereas the active site is intraluminal in secretory vesicles [24]. Consequently, detection of the enzymatic activity of alkaline phosphatase in secretory vesicles requires solubilization of the vesicle membrane, a phenomenon known as enzyme latency [34]. Because the substrate for the alkaline phosphatase assay, pNPP, is membrane-impermeable and because the access of substrate to catalytic domain has been used previously to assess the orientation of vesicles from PMN [35], we reasoned that the relative access of active alkaline phosphatase to substrate in the absence or presence of detergent solubilization of EVs would indicate their orientation. The addition of Tx-100 to PMN-fMLF EVs did not change alkaline phosphatase activity (1.5 ± 0.5 without Tx-100 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5 with Tx-100, expressed as mean ± SEM in A450 units; n = 4). In contrast, and consistent with previous published work [35], the alkaline phosphatase activity of a subcellular fraction of PMN recovered from a Percoll density gradient and containing a mixture of plasma membrane and secretory vesicles [36] increased 4.5 ± 0.03 fold (p = .0001, n = 4) after the addition of Tx-100. Taken together, these data indicate that the EVs had the same outside-out orientation as does plasma membrane.

PMN-fMLF EVs contained both PMN plasma membrane and granule proteins. PMN-fMLF EVs expressed the NADPH oxidase plasma membrane components gp91phox and p22phox and the azurophilic granule proteins HNE and MPO as detected by immunoblotting (Figure 1D - F). Furthermore, HNE and MPO associated with PMN-fMLF EVs retained enzymatic activity. Elastase activity of isolated EVs was 14,904 ± 1,480 RLU/μg, whereas activity of purified HNE activity was 28,831 ± 4,329 RLU/μg and that of isolated PMN granules 27,875 ± 2,448/5 × 10−4 cell equivalents (n = 3 for all determinations). Active MPO was quantified as the capacity of EVs to generate HOCl in the presence of exogenous hydrogen peroxide and chloride [37]. 5 μg of EV protein generated 2.31 ± 0.39 nmoles HOCl (n = 3). As a frame of reference, 100 fmoles of purified MPO generated 0.86 ± 0.01nmoles HOCl (n = 5).

PMN-fMLF EVs prime the NADPH oxidase in naïve PMN

Activation of the NADPH oxidase represents one of the cellular responses critical to PMN-mediated host response. To determine if PMN-fMLF EVs influence NADPH oxidase activation in naïve PMN, we compared the ability of PMN-fMLF EVs to prime superoxide production from PMN with that of the established priming agent LPS/LBP [28], using SOD-inhibitable ferricytochrome C reduction to quantitate fMLF-induced superoxide anion production. LPS/LBP treatment enhanced fMLF-stimulated superoxide anion production approximately 2.5-fold (Figure 2). Similarly, PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL) primed fMLF-induced NADPH oxidase activity in naïve PMN (Figure 2). PMN-fMLF EVs did not prime PMN at 5 μg/mL (1.2 ± 0.2 -fold increase, n = 3, NS) , and PMN-fMLF EVs did not directly elicit superoxide production by PMN (0.93 ± 0.23 nmoles/106 PMN vs 1.76 ± 0.62 nmoles/106 PMN with PBS alone, n = 5, NS). These data demonstrate that EVs from fMLF-activated PMN served as a priming agent for NADPH oxidase activation in naïve PMN.

Figure 2. PMN-fMLF EVs enhance superoxide anion generation by PMN.

Figure 2.

PMN were treated for 20 min at 37°C with PBS, LPS (100 ng/mL)/LBP (50 ng/mL), or PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL, labelled in Figures as fMLF-EVs). Each group of PMN was incubated for 20 min at 37°C with ferricytochrome C (100 μM) in the presence of fMLF (10−7 M) and the presence or absence of SOD (50 μg/mL). Absorption at 550 nm was measured spectrophotometrically and superoxide anion was defined as SOD-inhibitable ferricytochrome C reduction. Bars represent the average of 17 experiments ± SEM. p-values were determined using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA and Tukey posttest (** p < 0.01 and **** p <0.0001 vs. PBS).

PMN-fMLF EVs promote surface expression of flavocytochrome b558, complement receptors and phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox in naïve PMN

At least two cellular responses mediate priming of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase, [reviewed in [38]], namely granule exocytosis with concomitant redistribution of flavocytochrome b558 from the membranes of secretory vesicles and secondary granules to the plasma membrane [39] and targeted phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox [reviewed in [40]], as previously reported for priming with either TNFα [41] or LBP-LPS [42].

To determine if PMN-fMLF EVs prompted redistribution of membrane proteins, which would contribute to the observed priming of oxidase activity in naïve PMN by PMN-fMLF EVs, we assessed changes in expression of functionally important membrane proteins on the surface of PMN after exposure to PMN-fMLF EVs. Flow cytometry with the antibody 7D5, which specifically recognizes an extracellular epitope of flavocytochrome b558 [21], demonstrated that treatment of PMN with PMN-fMLF EVs prompted redistribution of flavocytochrome b558 from secretory vesicles and specific granules [28] to the cell surface (Figure 3A). Supporting this evidence that secretory vesicles fused with plasma membrane after PMN-fMLF EV treatment, PMN treated with LPS/LBP or with PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL) upregulated surface expression of CD11b (Figure 3B) and the secretory vesicle integral membrane protein CD35 (Figure 3C) [43]. Concomitantly, PMN-fMLF EVs also elicited limited degranulation of naïve PMN, as demonstrated by cell surface expression of CD66 and CD63, markers of secondary (specific) and primary (azurophilic) granules, respectively. PMN-fMLF EVs upregulated PMN surface expression of CD66 (Figure 3D) but did not prompt PMN surface expression of CD63 (Figure 3E). Stimulation of exocytosis with PMA (100 ng/mL) promoted increased expression of both CD66 and CD63, an expected response to such a potent agonist. These data show that PMN-fMLF EVs triggered plasma membrane fusion of secretory vesicles and specific granules, events that likely contributed to their capacity to prime the fMLF-stimulated NADPH oxidase activity.

Figure 3. Flow cytometry assessments of flavocytochrome b558 and cell surface markers on PMN-fMLF EV-treated PMN.

Figure 3.

PMN were treated for 40 min at 37°C with PBS, LPS (100 ng/mL)/LBP (50 ng/mL), or PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL). (A) PMN were labelled for flow cytometry with the anti-flavocytochrome b558 antibody 7D5 and a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody. FITC signal was quantified by flow cytometry. Data expressed as the geometric mean fluorescence of FITC+ cells and bars show the mean of four experiments ± SEM. p-values were determined using a paired Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05). (B) PMN were treated as in panel A or (in panels D and E) with PMA (100 ng/ml). Flow cytometry was performed using the following antibodies conjugated to fluorescent probes: (B) CD11b-PE, (C) CD35-FITC, (D) CD66-FITC, (E) CD63-PE. Data are expressed as the geometric mean fluorescence in FITC+ or PE+PMN, and bars represent mean ± SEM (n = at least three experiments). p-values were determined using a repeated measures one-way ANOVA and Dunnett posttest (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. PBS).

As noted, targeted phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox has been implicated in priming of fMLF-stimulated NADPH oxidase by TNFα or LPS [40-42]. To determine if PMN-fMLF EVs stimulate phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox, we measured priming of fMLF-stimulated oxidase activity and phosphorylation of p47phox on SER345, in parallel on PMN treated with buffer, LBP-LPS, or PMN-fMLF EVs before subsequent stimulation with fMLF. Both LBP-LPS and PMN-fMLF EVs were equally effective in augmenting superoxide production in response to a suboptimal concentration of fMLF (LBP-LPS 3.5 ± 0.9-fold vs 4.2 ± 0.4-fold, n = 6) and both LBP-LPS (1.72 ± 0.34-fold, n = 3) and PMN-fMLF EVs (2.33 ± 0.49-fold, n = 3) increased phosphorylation of SER345 (Figure 4). Taken together, these data indicate that PMN-fMLF EVs increased increased surface expression of flavocytochrome b558 and phosphorylation of SER345 in p47phox, two recognized mechanisms for oxidase priming, to prime activity of the NADPH oxidase in response to fMLF.

Figure 4. Analysis of p47phox phosphorylation at SER345.

Figure 4.

PMN lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for phosphorylated SER345 in p47phox. The amount of p47phox phosphorylated on SER345 detected was normalized to the total amount of p47phox immunoblotted and compared to that for PBS-stimulated PMN. Both LBP-LPS (1.72 ± 0.34-fold, n = 3) and PMN-fMLF EVs (2.33 ± 0.49-fold, n = 3) increased phosphorylation of SER345. Shown is a representative of three experiments.

PMN-fMLF EVs enhance phagocytic function of naïve PMN

Because complement receptors (CRs) contribute to the phagocytosis of serum-opsonized particles and PMN-fMLF EVs stimulated PMN translocated CD11b/CD18 (the β2 integrin receptor CR3) and CD35 (CR1) to their cell surface, we examined the effects of PMN-fMLF EV exposure on phagocytosis by naïve PMN. We fed serum-opsonized GFP-expressing S.aureus (MOI 0.5:1) to PMN that had been pretreated for 10 min with PBS or PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL) and quantified GFP-positive PMN by flow cytometry. More PMN engaged in phagocytosis in EV-treated PMN (Figures 5A and 5B). PMN-fMLF EVs did not increase the fluorescent intensity among GFP+ PMN (Figure 5C), suggesting that PMN-fMLF EVs promoted phagocytosis in a subset of PMN but did not alter their phagocytic index under these conditions. Doubling the concentration of PMN-fMLF EVs did not increase the percent of PMN that ingested S.aureus or the fluorescence of each PMN containing S.aureus (data not shown). However, increasing the MOI to 2:1 not only resulted in a higher percentage of PMN ingesting S.aureus after PMN-fMLF EV treatment (Figure 5D) but also promoted more S.aureus ingestion per PMN (Figure 5E). PMN-fMLF EVs increased the percentage of naïve PMN that ingested opsonized S.aureus, likely due in part to the concomitant increased surface expression of complement receptors CD11b/CD18 and CD35 prompted by exposure to PMN-fMLF EVs. The heterogeneity in PMN response to PMN-fMLF EVs may reflect the phenotypic diversity of circulating PMN and the presence of PMN subpopulations [44] or simply the stochastic nature of PMN encountering S.aureus while in suspension, with both the percentage of phagocytosing PMN and the organisms ingested per PMN increased at the higher MOI.

Figure 5. PMN-fMLF EVs enhance PMN phagocytosis.

Figure 5.

PMN were pretreated with PBS or PMN-fMLF EVs (10 μg/mL) for 10 min prior to being fed serum-opsonized GFP-expressing SA (MOI 0.5:1 for A-C and MOI 2:1 for D-E) for 10 min. After centrifugation to isolate PMN that had ingested S.aureus, association of GFP-expressing S.aureus with intact neutrophils was measured by flow cytometry. PMN were gated based off size discrimination, thereby eliminating any unassociated S.aureus. Panel (A) shows representative histograms of fluorescence of PMN alone without S aureus (left), and of PBS-treated (middle) and PMN-fMLF EV-treated (right) PMN after ingestion of S aureus at 0.5:1 MOI. Phagocytosis was defined by % of PMN that are GFP+ (B and D), and the geometric mean fluorescence of GFP+ PMN (C and E). Bars represent mean ± SEM (n = 4 for B-C and n = 3 for D-E). p-values were determined using a paired Student’s t test (** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001).

In summary, we demonstrate that PMN-fMLF EVs contained several PMN plasma membrane and enzymatically active granule proteins and displayed the same outside-out orientation as that of the plasma membrane. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the novel observations that PMN-fMLF EVs prime the NADPH oxidase and phagocytic activity of naïve PMN via stimulated fusion of secretory vesicles and specific granules along with targeted phosphorylation of SER345 on p47phox.

Although our data implicate PMN-fMLF EVs as the mediators of the phenotypic changes in naïve PMN, it is possible that there are at least two other factors contribute. First, trace amounts of fMLF, the stimulus used to promote EV generation, may be present in the final PMN-fMLF EV preparation. Whereas concentrations on the order of that used to stimulate PMN would trigger homologous desensitization of naïve PMN to subsequent stimulation with fMLF, the presence of fMLF at < 100 nM would prime the NADPH oxidase of PMN [45]. Furthermore, fMLF in the 10 to 100 nM range can enhance phagocytosis of opsonized S. aureus [46]. Such low concentrations of fMLF are not reliably quantitated, thus making it difficult to exclude this possibility with confidence. Second, it is possible that the initial stimulation with fMLF prompted PMN or the small percentage of contaminating leukocyte subsets (5 to 8%) to release bioactive molecules that could alter responses of naïve PMN to subsequent stimulation with fMLF. Addressing this possibility experimentally would require a wide survey of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and other bioactive molecules that are secreted by stimulated leukocytes and might be present in the PMN-fMLF EVs, followed by detailed analyses to implicate each as a potential causative agent in the observed priming. Even if feasible, such studies are beyond the scope of the work described. Either trace amounts of fMLF or leukocyte-derived bioactive molecules could act together with PMN-fMLF-EVs to augment phagocytosis and fMLF-mediated NADPH oxidase activity of naïve PMN.

Nonetheless, these data provide insights into how EVs from PMN might mediate PMN to PMN signaling and thus participate in regulation of the innate immune system in infection and inflammation.

Acknowledgements

We recognize the assistance of members of the Iowa Inflammation Program including Kevin Leidal, Athmane Teghanemt, Sally McCormick-Hill, Priya Issuree, Silvie Kremserova, and Lauren Kinkead, as well as from Edwina Rose Allen (Central Michigan University). This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grant 5T32AU996343 (BSA), the Iowa Biosciences Academy (MFA), the Iowa Center for Research by Undergraduates (MFA), the Dewey Stuit Fund for Undergraduate Research (MFA), NIH grants AI132335 and AI116546 (WMN), NIH grant R15GM132992 (MCG-W), Veterans Affairs Merit Review awards BX000513-09 (WMN) and BX002711 (ARH), and use of facilities at the Iowa City Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Abbreviation list

BCA

bicinchoninic acid

BSA

bovine serum albumin

CR

complement receptor

DPI

diphenyleneiodonium

EV

extracellular vesicle

FITC

fluorescein

fMLF

N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine

GFP

green fluorescent protein

HBSS

Hanks’ buffered salt solution

HEPES

4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid

HNE

human neutrophil elastase

HRP

horseradish peroxidase

HSA

human serum albumin

HMDM

human monocyte-derived macrophages

LBP

LPS-binding protein

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

MOI

multiplicity of infection

MPO

myeloperoxidase

PBS

phosphate buffered saline

PE

phycoerythrin

PMA

phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate

PMN

polymorphonuclear leukocytes

PMN-fMLF EVs

EVs from fMLF-treated PMN

RLU

relative luminescence units

RPMI

Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SOD

superoxide dismutase

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing financial interests to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.DeLeo FR and Nauseef WM (2020) Granulocytic Phagocytes. In Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases (Bennett JE, Dolin R, and Blaser MJ, eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA: 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mayadas TN, Cullere X, Lowell CA (2014) The multifaceted functions of neutrophils. Annu. Rev. Pathol 9, 181–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nauseef WM and Borregaard N (2014) Neutrophils at work. Nat. Immunol 15, 602–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greenlee-Wacker MC (2016) Clearance of apoptotic neutrophils and resolution of inflammation. Immunol. Rev 273, 357–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hong CW (2018) Extracellular Vesicles of Neutrophils. Immune Netw. 18, e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thery C Witwer KW Aikawa E Alcaraz MJ Anderson JD Andriantsitohaina R Antoniou A Arab T Archer F Atkin-Smith GK Ayre DC Bach JM Bachurski D Baharvand H Balaj L Baldacchino S Bauer NN Baxter AA Bebawy M Beckham C Bedina Zavec A Benmoussa A Berardi AC Bergese P Bielska E Blenkiron C Bobis-Wozowicz S Boilard E Boireau W Bongiovanni A Borras FE Bosch S Boulanger CM Breakefield X Breglio AM Brennan MA Brigstock DR Brisson A Broekman ML Bromberg JF Bryl-Gorecka P Buch S Buck AH Burger D Busatto S Buschmann D Bussolati B Buzas EI Byrd JB Camussi G Carter DR Caruso S Chamley LW Chang YT Chen C Chen S Cheng L Chin AR Clayton A Clerici SP Cocks A Cocucci E Coffey RJ Cordeiro-da-Silva A Couch Y Coumans FA Coyle B Crescitelli R Criado MF D'Souza-Schorey C Das S Datta Chaudhuri A de Candia P De Santana EF De Wever O Del Portillo HA Demaret T Deville S Devitt A Dhondt B Di Vizio D Dieterich LC Dolo V Dominguez Rubio AP Dominici M Dourado MR Driedonks TA Duarte FV Duncan HM Eichenberger RM Ekstrom K El Andaloussi S Elie-Caille C Erdbrugger U Falcon-Perez JM Fatima F Fish JE Flores-Bellver M Forsonits A Frelet-Barrand A Fricke F Fuhrmann G Gabrielsson S Gamez-Valero A Gardiner C Gartner K Gaudin R Gho YS Giebel B Gilbert C Gimona M Giusti I Goberdhan DC Gorgens A Gorski SM Greening DW Gross JC Gualerzi A Gupta GN Gustafson D Handberg A Haraszti RA Harrison P Hegyesi H Hendrix A Hill AF Hochberg FH Hoffmann KF Holder B Holthofer H Hosseinkhani B Hu G Huang Y Huber V Hunt S Ibrahim AG Ikezu T Inal JM Isin M Ivanova A Jackson HK Jacobsen S Jay SM Jayachandran M Jenster G Jiang L Johnson SM Jones JC Jong A Jovanovic-Talisman T Jung S Kalluri R Kano SI Kaur S Kawamura Y Keller ET Khamari D Khomyakova E Khvorova A Kierulf P Kim KP Kislinger T Klingeborn M Klinke DJ 2nd, Kornek M Kosanovic MM Kovacs AF Kramer-Albers EM Krasemann S Krause M Kurochkin IV Kusuma GD Kuypers S Laitinen S Langevin SM Languino LR Lannigan J Lasser C Laurent LC Lavieu G Lazaro-Ibanez E Le Lay S Lee MS Lee YXF Lemos DS Lenassi M Leszczynska A Li IT Liao K Libregts SF Ligeti E Lim R Lim SK Line A Linnemannstons K Llorente A Lombard CA Lorenowicz MJ Lorincz AM Lotvall J Lovett J Lowry MC Loyer X Lu Q Lukomska B Lunavat TR Maas SL Malhi H Marcilla A Mariani J Mariscal J Martens-Uzunova ES Martin-Jaular L Martinez MC Martins VR Mathieu M Mathivanan S Maugeri M McGinnis LK McVey MJ Meckes DG Jr., Meehan KL Mertens I Minciacchi VR Moller A Moller Jorgensen M Morales-Kastresana A Morhayim J Mullier F Muraca M Musante L Mussack V Muth DC Myburgh KH Najrana T Nawaz M Nazarenko I Nejsum P Neri C Neri T Nieuwland R Nimrichter L Nolan JP Nolte-'t Hoen EN Noren Hooten N O'Driscoll L O'Grady T O'Loghlen A Ochiya T Olivier M Ortiz A Ortiz LA Osteikoetxea X Ostergaard O Ostrowski M Park J Pegtel DM Peinado H Perut F Pfaffl MW Phinney DG Pieters BC Pink RC Pisetsky DS Pogge von Strandmann E Polakovicova I Poon IK Powell BH Prada I Pulliam L Quesenberry P Radeghieri A Raffai RL Raimondo S Rak J Ramirez MI Raposo G Rayyan MS Regev-Rudzki N Ricklefs FL Robbins PD Roberts DD Rodrigues SC Rohde E Rome S Rouschop KM Rughetti A Russell AE Saa P Sahoo S Salas-Huenuleo E Sanchez C Saugstad JA Saul MJ Schiffelers RM Schneider R Schoyen TH Scott A Shahaj E Sharma S Shatnyeva O Shekari F Shelke GV Shetty AK Shiba K Siljander PR Silva AM Skowronek A Snyder OL 2nd Soares RP Sodar BW Soekmadji C Sotillo J Stahl PD Stoorvogel W Stott SL Strasser EF Swift S Tahara H Tewari M Timms K Tiwari S Tixeira R Tkach M Toh WS Tomasini R Torrecilhas AC Tosar JP Toxavidis V Urbanelli L Vader P van Balkom BW van der Grein SG Van Deun J van Herwijnen MJ Van Keuren-Jensen K van Niel G van Royen ME van Wijnen AJ Vasconcelos MH Vechetti IJ Jr. Veit TD Vella LJ Velot E Verweij FJ Vestad B Vinas JL Visnovitz T Vukman KV Wahlgren J Watson DC Wauben MH Weaver A Webber JP Weber V Wehman AM Weiss DJ Welsh JA Wendt S Wheelock AM Wiener Z Witte L Wolfram J Xagorari A Xander P Xu J Yan X Yanez-Mo M Yin H Yuana Y Zappulli V Zarubova J Zekas V Zhang JY Zhao Z Zheng L Zheutlin AR Zickler AM Zimmermann P Zivkovic AM Zocco D and Zuba-Surma EK (2018) Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. Journal of extracellular vesicles 7, 1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Slater TW, Finkielsztein A, Mascarenhas LA, Mehl LC, Butin-Israeli V, Sumagin R (2017) Neutrophil Microparticles Deliver Active Myeloperoxidase to Injured Mucosa To Inhibit Epithelial Wound Healing. J. Immunol 198, 2886–2897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boilard E (2018) Extracellular vesicles and their content in bioactive lipid mediators: more than a sack of microRNA. J. Lipid Res 59, 2037–2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Johnson BL Iii, Kuethe JW, Caldwell CC (2014) Neutrophil derived microvesicles: emerging role of a key mediator to the immune response. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 14, 210–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalli J, Montero-Melendez T, Norling LV, Yin X, Hinds C, Haskard D, Mayr M, Perretti M (2013) Heterogeneity in neutrophil microparticles reveals distinct proteome and functional properties. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 2205–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eken C, Sadallah S, Martin PJ, Treves S, Schifferli JA (2013) Ectosomes of polymorphonuclear neutrophils activate multiple signaling pathways in macrophages. Immunobiology 218, 382–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marki A, Buscher K, Lorenzini C, Meyer M, Saigusa R, Fan Z, Yeh YT, Hartmann N, Dan JM, Kiosses WB, Golden GJ, Ganesan R, Winkels H, Orecchioni M, McArdle S, Mikulski Z, Altman Y, Bui J, Kronenberg M, Chien S, Esko JD, Nizet V, Smalley D, Roth J, Ley K (2021) Elongated neutrophil-derived structures are blood-borne microparticles formed by rolling neutrophils during sepsis. J. Exp. Med 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kolonics F, Kajdácsi E, Farkas VJ, Veres DS, Khamari D, Kittel Á, Merchant ML, McLeish KR, Lőrincz Á M, Ligeti E (2020) Neutrophils produce proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory extracellular vesicles depending on the environmental conditions. J. Leukoc. Biol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pitanga TN, de Aragao Franca L, Rocha VC, Meirelles T, Borges VM, Goncalves MS, Pontes-de-Carvalho LC, Noronha-Dutra AA, dos-Santos WL (2014) Neutrophil-derived microparticles induce myeloperoxidase-mediated damage of vascular endothelial cells. BMC Cell Biol. 15, 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alvarez-Jiménez VD, Leyva-Paredes K, García-Martínez M, Vázquez-Flores L, García-Paredes VG, Campillo-Navarro M, Romo-Cruz I, Rosales-García VH, Castañeda-Casimiro J, González-Pozos S, Hernández JM, Wong-Baeza C, García-Pérez BE, Ortiz-Navarrete V, Estrada-Parra S, Serafín-López J, Wong-Baeza I, Chacón-Salinas R, Estrada-García I (2018) Extracellular Vesicles Released from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Infected Neutrophils Promote Macrophage Autophagy and Decrease Intracellular Mycobacterial Survival. Front. Immunol 9, 272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gasser O and Schifferli JA (2004) Activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils disseminate anti-inflammatory microparticles by ectocytosis. Blood 104, 2543–2548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eken C, Martin PJ, Sadallah S, Treves S, Schaller M, Schifferli JA (2010) Ectosomes released by polymorphonuclear neutrophils induce a MerTK-dependent anti-inflammatory pathway in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem 285, 39914–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nauseef WM (1986) Myeloperoxidase biosynthesis by a human promyelocytic leukemia cell line: insight into myeloperoxidase deficiency. Blood 67, 865–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burritt JB, Quinn MT, Jutila MA, Bond CW, Jesaitis AJ (1995) Topological mapping of neutrophil cytochrome b epitopes with phage-display libraries. J. Biol. Chem 270 16974–16980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakamura M, Murakami M, Koga T, Tanaka Y, Minakami S (1987) Monoclonal antibody 7D5 raised to cytochrome b 558 of human neutrophils: immunocytochemical detection of the antigen in peripheral phagocytes of normal subjects, patients with chronic granulomatous disease, and their carrier mothers. Blood 69, 1404–1408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burritt JB, DeLeo FR, McDonald CL, Prigge JR, Dinauer MC, Nakamura M, Nauseef WM, Jesaitis AJ (2001) Phage display epitope mapping of human neutrophil flavocytochrome b 558 .Identification of two juxtaposed extracellular domains. .J. Biol. Chem 276, 2053–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nauseef WM (2014) Isolation of human neutrophils from venous blood. Methods Mol. Biol 1124, 13–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Allen ER, Lempke SL, Miller MM, Bush DM, Braswell BG, Estes CL, Benedict EL, Mahon AR, Sabo SL, Greenlee-Wacker MC (2020) Effect of extracellular vesicles from S. aureus-challenged human neutrophils on macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol 108, 1841–1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borregaard N, Christensen L, Bjerrum OW, Birgens HS, Clemmensen I (1990) Identification of a highly mobilizable subset of human neutrophil intracellular vesicles that contains tetranectin and latent alkaline phosphatase. J. Clin. Invest 85, 408–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thomas RM, Nauseef WM, Iyer SS, Peterson MW, Stone PJ, Clark RA (1991) A cytosolic inhibitor of human neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G. J. Leukoc. Biol 50, 568–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Man SM, Karki R, Kanneganti TD (2017) Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis, inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes in infectious diseases. Immunol. Rev 277, 61–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Babior BM, Kipnes RS, Curnutte JT (1973) Biological defence mechanisms. The production by leukocytes of superoxide, a potential bactericidal agent. J.Clin.Invest 52, 741–744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.DeLeo FR, Renee J, McCormick S, Nakamura M, Apicella MA, Weiss JP, Nauseef WM (1998) Neutrophils exposed to bacterial lipopolysaccharide up-regulate NADPH oxidase assembly. J.Clin.Invest 101, 455–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DeLeo FR, Allen LAH, Apicella MA, Nauseef WM (1999) NADPH oxidase activation and assembly during phagocytosis. J. Immunol 163, 6732–6740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwartz J, Leidal KG, Femling JK, Weiss JP, Nauseef WM (2009) Neutrophil bleaching of GFP-expressing staphylococci: probing the intraphagosomal fate of individual bacteria. J. Immunol 183, 2632–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Greenlee-Wacker MC, Rigby KM, Kobayashi SD, Porter AR, Deleo FR, Nauseef WM (2014) Phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by Human Neutrophils Prevents Macrophage Efferocytosis and Induces Programmed Necrosis. J. Immunol 192, 4709–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ellis JA, Mayer SJ, Jones OTG (1988) The effect of the NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenyliodonium on aerobic and anaerobic microbicidal activities of human neutrophils. Biochem. J 251, 887–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mathieu M, Névo N, Jouve M, Valenzuela JI, Maurin M, Verweij F, Palmulli R, Lankar D, Dingli F, Loew D, Rubinstein E, Boncompain G, Perez F, Théry C (2020) Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking and synchronized extracellular vesicle release of CD9 and CD63. bioRxiv, 2020.10.27.323766. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berthet J and De Duve C (1951) Tissue fractionation studies. I. The existence of a mitochondria-linked, enzymically inactive form of acid phosphatase in rat-liver tissue. Biochem. J 50, 174–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Borregaard N, Miller LJ, Springer TA (1987) Chemoattractant-regulated mobilization of a novel intracellular compartment in human neutrophils. Science 237, 1204–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Borregaard N, Heiple JM, Simons ER, Clark RA (1983) Subcellular localization of the b-cytochrome component of the human neutrophil microbicidal oxidase: translocation during activation. J. Cell Biol 97, 52–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dypbukt JM, Bishop C, Brooks WM, Thong B, Eriksson H, Kettle AJ (2005) A sensitive and selective assay for chloramine production by myeloperoxidase. Free Radic. Biol. Med 39, 1468–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miralda I, Uriarte SM, McLeish KR (2017) Multiple Phenotypic Changes Define Neutrophil Priming. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 7, 217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uriarte SM, Rane MJ, Luerman GC, Barati MT, Ward RA, Nauseef WM, McLeish KR (2011) Granule exocytosis contributes to priming and activation of the human neutrophil respiratory burst. J.Immunology 187, 391–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.El Benna J, Hurtado-Nedelec M, Marzaioli V, Marie JC, Gougerot-Pocidalo MA, Dang PM (2016) Priming of the neutrophil respiratory burst: role in host defense and inflammation. Immunol. Rev 273, 180–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boussetta T, Gougerot-Pocidalo MA, Hayem G, Ciappelloni S, Raad H, Derkawi RA, Bournier O, Kroviarski Y, Zhou XZ, Malter JS, Lu PK, Bartegi A, Dang PMC, El-Benna J (2010) The prolyl isomerase Pin1 acts as a novel molecular switch for TNF-α-induced priming of the NADPH oxidase in human neutrophils. Blood 116, 5795–5802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu M, Bedouhene S, Hurtado-Nedelec M, Pintard C, Dang PM, Yu S, El-Benna J (2019) The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Controls Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Priming of NADPH Oxidase in Human Neutrophils. Front. Immunol 10, 2567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cowland JB and Borregaard N (2016) Granulopoiesis and granules of human neutrophils. Immunol. Rev 273, 11–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Scapini P, Marini O, Tecchio C, Cassatella MA (2016) Human neutrophils in the saga of cellular heterogeneity: insights and open questions. Immunol. Rev 273, 48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McPhail LC, Clayton CC, Snyderman R (1984) The NADPH oxidase of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Evidence for regulation by multiple signals. J. Biol. Chem 259, 5768–5775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Weiß E, Schlatterer K, Beck C, Peschel A, Kretschmer D (2020) Formyl-Peptide Receptor Activation Enhances Phagocytosis of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis 221, 668–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES