Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2018 Dec 8;126(5):759–763. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.011

GNAQ Mutations in Diffuse and Solitary Choroidal Hemangiomas

JH Francis 1,2, T Milman 3, H Grossniklaus 4, DM Albert 5, R Folberg 6, GM Levitin 7, SE Coupland 8, F Catalanotti 1, D Rabady 9, C Kandoth 1, KJ Busam 1,2, DH Abramson 1,2
PMCID: PMC8425501  NIHMSID: NIHMS1051942  PMID: 30537484

Abstract

Purpose:

GNAQ mutations have been identified in port wine stains (both syndromic and non-syndromic) and melanocytic ocular neoplasms. This study investigates the presence of GNAQ mutations in diffuse- (those associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS)) and solitary choroidal hemangiomas.

Participants:

Tissue from 11 patients with the following diagnoses: port wine stain (n = 3), diffuse choroidal hemangioma (n = 1), solitary choroidal hemangioma (n = 6), choroidal nevus (n =1)

Methods:

Ten specimens were interrogated with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing assay for targeted deep sequencing of all exons and selected introns of 468 key cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors. Digital polymerase chain reaction was used to detect GNAQ Q209 mutation in one specimen.

Main outcomes:

Detection of GNAQ codon-specific mutation

Results:

Activating somatic GNAQ mutations (c.547C>T; p.Arg183Cys) were found in 100% (3 of 3) of the port wine stain and in the diffuse choroidal hemangioma. Somatic GNAQ mutations (c.626A>T;p.Gln209Leu) were found in 100% (6 of 6) of the solitary choroidal hemangiomas and (c.626A>C;p.Gln209Pro) in the choroidal nevus.

Conclusion:

GNAQ mutations occur in both diffuse and solitary hemangiomas, although, at distinct codons. An R183 codon is mutant in diffuse choroidal hemangiomas, consistent with other Sturge-Weber vascular malformations. By contrast, solitary choroidal hemangiomas have mutations in the Q209 codon, similar to other intraocular melanocytic neoplasms.

Precis:

Both diffuse and solitary choroidal hemangiomas have activating mutations in GNAQ, although they are present in distinct codons.

Introduction

Mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 result in dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), which influences gene transcription and results in cellular proliferation.1 A group of vascular and pigmented neoplasms is recognized to have GNAQ/11 mutations, including both benign and malignant variants (Table 1).220,21,22 Many of these lesions have been identified in the eye or the periocular tissues. The most frequently mutated lesions include 82–95% of choroidal nevi and melanomas, which have mutually exclusive mutations in GNAQ or GNA11, most commonly at the Q209 codon.11 With similar frequency, port wine stains (either non-syndromic or related to Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS)) have GNAQ mutations, but at codon R183.2

Table 1:

Published literature on GNAQ mutations

Diagnosis Mutated Codon
GNAQp.R183 GNA11p.R183 GNAQp.Q209 GNA11p.Q209

SWS port wine stain 12/13 (88%)2,3, 18/20 (90%)6
non-SWS port wine stain 23/26 (92%)2,3
SWS gingval lesion 1 case5, 19/20 (95%)6
SWS CNS (leptomeningeal angiomatosis) 15/18 (83%)2, 9/9 (100%)7, 12/15 (80%)8
SWS CNS (cortex/white matter) 7/9 (78%)7
Extensive dermal melanocytosis 1/3 (33%)9 1/3 (33%)9
Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis 2/8 (25%)9 4/8 (50%)9
Lobular capillary hemangioma 2/3 (66%)12
Port wine stain extemity 3/7 (43%)4
Congenital hemangioma 8/16 (50%)13 4/16 (25%)13
Anastamosing hemangioma 9/13 (69%)14
Hepatic small vessel neoplasm 2/3 (66%), 2/8 (25%)15
Common blue nevus 1/41 (2.4%)10,11 4/10 (40%)21, 39/60 (65%)10,11 4/60 (6.7%)10,11
Blitz nevi 1/7 (14%)16
Uveal melanoma 4/145 (2.8%)10,11 3/145 (2.1%)10,11 73/163 (44.8%)10,11 52/163 (31.9%)10,11
Melanosis oculi 1/11 (9.1%)10,11 2/20 (10%)10,11 1/20 (5%)10,11
Choroidal nevi 7/16 (44%)17 8/16 (50%)17
Melanocytoma (iris, optic n) 2/6 (33%)18
Melanocytoma (ciliochoroid) 2/2 (100%)19
Melanocytoma (CNS) 8/16 (50%)20
Conjunctival blue nevus 2/2 (100%)22

SWS = Sturge-Weber syndrome, CNS = central nervous system

The eyes of patients with SWS characteristically develop an intraocular vascular malformation, termed diffuse choroidal hemangioma. To date, there is a single published case that identifies a GNAQ R183Q mutation in this intraocular lesion23. However, there is no published genetic information regarding the non-syndromic counterpart, solitary choroidal hemangiomas. These solitary lesions are typically discovered later in life, can be asymptomatic and unlike diffuse hemangiomas in SWS are not associated with ipsilateral glaucoma. In this study, we investigated whether diffuse and solitary choroidal hemangiomas harbor GNAQ/11 mutations with particular attention to the codon involved.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai and the University of Washington School of Medicine and Public Health and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. At the participating institutions, choroidal hemangioma specimens were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology. The specimens were obtained through a search of the respective database, patient and tissue records. The cohort included 11 specimens: 1 diffuse choroidal hemangioma, three port wine stains (2 related to SWS and one non-SWS), six solitary choroidal hemangiomas and one choroidal nevus. An ophthalmic pathologist at each institution made the initial pathological diagnosis. All intraocular tumor specimens were obtained from enucleated eyes. The correct diagnosis was confirmed and the amount of lesional tissue assessed for suitability for inclusion in the study by MSKCC pathology (KB). Ten of 11 samples were investigated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) Assay. Due to a small quantity of tissue, one specimen (number 8) was studied using the digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay for the GNAQ residue Q209 mutation.

Isolation and purification of DNA

Microdissection was performed on the ten formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples on 10μm-thick unstained sections, using hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) sections as a guide. The DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) was used for DNA extraction according to manufacturer’s recommendations. The Nano-Drop 8000 (Thermo Scientific) and Qubit (Life Technologies) were employed to quantify the extracted DNA. The minimum concentration of formalin fixed paraffin embedded DNA was 250ng.

Exon-capture sequencing

Genetic alterations in GNAQ/11 were profiled using the IMPACT assay (Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets). As previously described in detail,24,25 this assay employs solution phase hybridization-based exon capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing to interrogate all protein-coding exons and select introns of 410 oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and members of pathways considered actionable by targeted therapies. The concentration of genomic DNA and DNA sequence library are both tested at the beginning of the assay before and after exon capture. If the yield is too low at any of these steps, the sample is designated as “failed”: this designation did not apply to any specimens studied.

Digital drop polymerase chain reaction assay (ddPCR)

Assays specific for the detection of GNAQ-p.Q209R-626A>G were designed and ordered through BioRad (Hercules, CA): (Unique Assay ID: dHsaMDS971099482). Cycling conditions were tested to allow for optimal annealing/extension temperature in addition to optimal separation of positive from empty droplets. All reactions were executed on a QX200 ddPCR system (BioRad, Hercules CA). Plates were read and analyzed with the QuantaSoft software (BioRad, Hercules, CA) to evaluate the number of droplets positive for mutant DNA, wild-type DNA, both, or neither.

Results

All eleven specimens contained activating somatic GNAQ mutations in either c.547C>T; p.Arg183Cys (p.R183Q), c.626A>C;p.Gln209Pro (p.Q209P) or c.626A>T;p.Gln209Leu (p.Q209R). Table 2 provides a summary of the results.

Table 2:

Pathological diagnosis and GNAQ mutations

Specimen Pathological Diagnosis GNAQ mutation

1 SWS Diffuse Choroidal Hemangioma p.R183Q
2 SWS Port Wine Stain p.R183Q
3 Non SWS Port Wine Stain p.R183Q
4 SWS Port Wine Stain p.R183Q
5 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma p.Q209R
6 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma p.Q209R
7 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma p.Q209R
8 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma* p.Q209R
9 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma p.Q209R
10 Solitary Choroidal Hemangioma p.Q209R
11 Choroidal Nevus p.Q209P
*

= by ddPCR assay, SW = Sturge-Weber syndrome

Discussion

SWS (also known as encephalofacial angiomatosis) is a neurocutaneous disorder and manifests clinically as a vascular malformation involving the skin, neural tissue, and eye. It occurs sporadically from an activating mutation in GNAQ at codon R183.2 Previously published reports have confirmed the presence of this mutation in many characteristic features of SWS including cutaneous capillary malformations (port wine stain)2,3,6 in addition to gingival lesions,5,6 leptomeningeal angiomatosis2,7,8 and even the adjacent cortex/white matter.7 A single published case identifies the presence of the hallmark genetic aberration in the intraocular tumor associated with this syndrome23. In this study, we confirm that the intraocular manifestation of SWS, a diffuse choroidal hemangioma, has a mutation in GNAQ at the R183Q codon.

Solitary choroidal hemangioma is a circumscribed vascular tumor histopathologically similar to the diffuse counterpart, although its clinical presentation and features are distinct. One of the central questions in this present study was whether solitary and diffuse choroidal hemangiomas share the same mutational profile. We discovered that they both exhibit mutations in GNAQ, but at different codons: diffuse hemangiomas at R183Q, which is consistent with SWS, and solitary hemangiomas at Q209. The latter is similar to other solitary uveal neoplasms: choroidal nevi and uveal melanoma.

The significance of these specific codons has been debated in the literature in relation to other GNAQ mutated lesions. Mutations in either R183 or Q209 both have a gain-of-function effect with hyperactivation of downstream MAPKinase pathways.1 However, they have a distinct impact on G-alpha protein structure and different modulation of signal intensity.2,5,9,26 For example, mutations in codon 183 have “weaker and less promiscuous” effects on signaling2. In contrast, mutations in codon 209 result in complete inactivation, thereby resulting in a more profound activation of downstream MAPKinase signaling.2,3 In Table 1, note that Q209 inhibition appears to occur more often in lesions that are solitary and deeply or viscerally located.

The question becomes how we can relate this knowledge to diffuse and solitary hemangiomas. It has been proposed that the more severe Q209 inhibition (compared to R183) may explain the presence of this mutation in “tumors” (which we interpret as mass-producing neoplasms with a potential for significant growth) and not stationary malformations.3,11,13Akin to Happle’s theory, which states that less severe mutations are more sustainable in the germline,27 could it be possible that less severe mutations are supportable more often in malformations than tumors? Both SWS and Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis have the less severe R183 mutations identified in their characteristic malformations.9 Corresponding to this, we identified the R183 mutation in diffuse capillary hemangioma, which is consistent with this lesion being a malformation related to SWS.

In contrast, the codon Q209 mutation in solitary choroidal hemangiomas is more compatible with these lesions being tumors, rather than with a developmental aberration that yields a stationary malformation. As such, it would point toward solitary choroidal hemangiomas as acquired lesions (and therefore absent at birth –a contentious subject), much along the same lines as other GNAQ Q209 mutant lesions such as choroidal nevi, uveal melanomas. To add complexity to this topic, it may not simply be distinct genomics that differentiate the final phenotype, but we have to also consider the contribution of epigenetics and even environmental factors.

Cuoto et al. have hypothesized that an early versus late origin of the mutation defines whether the pathology is syndromic or non-syndromic4. If this proves to be accurate, then it would follow that: if solitary choroidal hemangiomas were merely the non-syndromic counterpart to diffuse choroidal hemangiomas, they would share GNAQ mutations at the same codon and be detected at birth. However, solitary hemangiomas are typically detected in adulthood with a characteristic progressive clinical course and have distinct codon mutations at Q209, making them unlikely to represent the non-syndromic version of diffuse choroidal hemangiomas.

The 183-codon-specific mutation in capillary hemangiomas is recognized to be rich in endothelial cells4. Presumably, even though solitary choroidal hemangiomas and choroidal nevi/melanomas share mutations in the same gene (GNAQ), and at the same codon (Q209), the cell harboring the mutation differs in these lesions: occurring at the endothelial cell in solitary hemangiomas and the melanocyte in nevi/melanomas. We hope future studies will prove this hypothesis to be correct and to confirm our present findings with a larger scale study. With the recent discovery of a natural compound (FR900359) which targets and deactivates the aberrant G alpha q signaling,28 the identification of GNAQ mutations in both diffuse and solitary choroidal hemangiomas may have promising clinical applications.

Acknowledgments

The Fund for Ophthalmic Knowledge supported this study, Research to Prevent Blindness and Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748), Cycle for Survival, and the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Akinleye A, Furqan M, Mukhi N, et al. MEK and the inhibitors: from bench to bedside. J Hematol Oncol 2013;6:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1971–1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Couto JA, Huang L, Vivero MP, et al. Endothelial Cells from Capillary Malformations Are Enriched for Somatic GNAQ Mutations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:77e–82e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Couto JA, Ayturk UM, Konczyk DJ, et al. A somatic GNA11 mutation is associated with extremity capillary malformation and overgrowth. Angiogenesis 2017;20:303–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martins L, Giovani PA, Rebouças PD, et al. Computational analysis for GNAQ mutations: New insights on the molecular etiology of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Mol Graph Model 2017;76:429–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma G, Yu Z, Liu F, et al. Somatic GNAQ mutation in different structures of Port-wine Macrocheilia. Br J Dermatol 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sundaram SK, Michelhaugh SK, Klinger NV, et al. GNAQ Mutation in the Venous Vascular Malformation and Underlying Brain Tissue in Sturge-Weber Syndrome. Neuropediatrics 2017;48:385–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nakashima M, Miyajima M, Sugano H, et al. The somatic GNAQ mutation c.548G>A (p.R183Q) is consistently found in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Hum Genet 2014;59:691–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thomas AC, Zeng Z, Rivière J-B, et al. Mosaic Activating Mutations in GNA11 and GNAQ Are Associated with Phakomatosis Pigmentovascularis and Extensive Dermal Melanocytosis. J Invest Dermatol 2016;136:770–778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Raamsdonk CD, Bezrookove V, Green G, et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature 2009;457:599–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van Raamsdonk CD, Griewank KG, Crosby MB, et al. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2191–2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lim YH, Bacchiocchi A, Qiu J, et al. GNA14 Somatic Mutation Causes Congenital and Sporadic Vascular Tumors by MAPK Activation. Am J Hum Genet 2016;99:443–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ayturk UM, Couto JA, Hann S, et al. Somatic Activating Mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 Are Associated with Congenital Hemangioma. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:789–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bean GR, Joseph NM, Gill RM, et al. Recurrent GNAQ mutations in anastomosing hemangiomas. Mod Pathol 2017;30:722–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Joseph NM, Brunt EM, Marginean C, et al. Frequent GNAQ and GNA14 Mutations in Hepatic Small Vessel Neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 2018:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Isales MC, Haugh AM, Bubley J, et al. Genomic Assessment of Blitz Nevi Suggests Classification as a Subset of Blue Nevus Rather Than Spitz Nevus: Clinical, Histopathologic, and Molecular Analysis of 18 Cases. Am J Dermatopathol 2018;40:118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vader MJC, Madigan MC, Versluis M, et al. GNAQ and GNA11 mutations and downstream YAP activation in choroidal nevi. Br J Cancer 2017;117:884–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Francis JH, Wiesner T, Milman T, et al. Investigation of Somatic GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1 and SF3B1 Mutations in Ophthalmic Melanocytomas. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2016;2:171–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mudhar HS, Doherty R, Salawu A, et al. Immunohistochemical and molecular pathology of ocular uveal melanocytoma: evidence for somatic GNAQ mutations. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:924–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, van Engen-van Grunsven IACH, Coupland SE, et al. Mutations in g protein encoding genes and chromosomal alterations in primary leptomeningeal melanocytic neoplasms. Pathol Oncol Res 2015;21:439–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Emley A, Nguyen LP, Yang S, Mahalingam M. Somatic mutations in GNAQ in amelanotic/hypomelanotic blue nevi. Hum Pathol 2011;42:136–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Francis JH, Grossniklaus HE, Habib LA, et al. BRAF, NRAS, and GNAQ Mutations in Conjunctival Melanocytic Nevi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:117–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bichsel CA, Goss J, Alomari M, et al. Association of Somatic GNAQ Mutation With Capillary Malformations in a Case of Choroidal Hemangioma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cheng DT, Mitchell TN, Zehir A, et al. Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology. J Mol Diagn 2015;17:251–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang Z, Li Y, Zhao Z, et al. GNAQ mutation R183Q as a potential cause of familial Sturge-Weber syndrome: A case report. Oncol Lett 2017;13:2665–2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Happle R. Lethal genes surviving by mosaicism: A possible explanation for sporadic birth defects involving the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Onken MD, Makepeace CM, Kaltenbronn KM, et al. Targeting nucleotide exchange to inhibit constitutively active G protein α subunits in cancer cells. Sci Signal 2018;11:eaao6852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES