Skip to main content
Advanced Science logoLink to Advanced Science
. 2021 Jul 8;8(17):2100782. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100782

Large Anomalous Hall and Nernst Effects in High Curie‐Temperature Iron‐Based Heusler Compounds

Felix Mende 1, Jonathan Noky 1, Satya N Guin 1, Gerhard H Fecher 1, Kaustuv Manna 1,2, Peter Adler 1, Walter Schnelle 1, Yan Sun 1, Chenguang Fu 1,3,, Claudia Felser 1,
PMCID: PMC8425906  PMID: 34240573

Abstract

The interplay between topology and magnetism has recently sparked the frontier studies of magnetic topological materials that exhibit intriguing anomalous Hall and Nernst effects owning to the large intrinsic Berry curvature (BC). To better understand the anomalous quantum transport properties of these materials and their implications for future applications such as electronic and thermoelectric devices, it is crucial to discover more novel material platforms for performing anomalous transverse transport studies. Here, it is experimentally demonstrated that low‐cost Fe‐based Heusler compounds exhibit large anomalous Hall and Nernst effects. An anomalous Hall conductivity of 250–750 S cm−1 and Nernst thermopower of above 2 µV K−1 are observed near room temperature. The positive effect of anti‐site disorder on the anomalous Hall transport is revealed. Considering the very high Curie temperature (nearly 1000 K), larger Nernst thermopowers at high temperatures are expected owing to the existing magnetic order and the intrinsic BC. This work provides a background for developing low‐cost Fe‐based Heusler compounds as a new material platform for anomalous transport studies and applications, in particular, near and above room temperature.

Keywords: disorder, Heusler compounds, magnetic Weyl materials, single crystals, thermoelectrics


This study reports large anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in high Curie‐temperature Iron‐based Heusler compounds. The positive effect of anti‐site disorder on the anomalous Hall transport is revealed. Considering the very high Curie temperature (nearly 1000 K), larger Nernst thermopowers at high temperatures are expected in the studied compounds owing to the existing magnetic order and the intrinsic Berry curvature.

graphic file with name ADVS-8-2100782-g005.jpg

1. Introduction

The demand for energy‐efficient dissipationless electronics and sustainable energy conversion technologies has become a major impetus for the development of advanced materials with electronic and magnetic functionality. Topological materials are known to host exotic electronic structures that serve as an ideal platform to explore anomalous quantum transport properties for a variety of functional applications, including super‐fast electronic devices, spintronics, data storage, and thermoelectrics.[ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ] To date, most topological phases and exotic transport behaviors have been discovered in non‐magnetic topological materials, for example, topological surface states in topological insulators,[ 6, 7 ] ultra‐high carrier mobility,[ 8 ] giant electrical and thermal magneto‐resistances in Dirac/Weyl semimetals,[ 9, 10, 11, 12 ] and the chiral anomaly and negative magnetoresistance[ 13, 14 ] and large Nernst effect[ 15, 16 ] in Weyl semimetals. Magnetic topological materials,[ 3, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ] in which topology and magnetism are present in the same system, provide new opportunities for the realization of the Berry‐curvature‐induced anomalous transverse transport phenomena, that is, anomalous Hall effect (AHE)[ 18 ] and anomalous Nernst effect (ANE),[ 19, 20, 21 ] which show potential applications in power electronics and thermoelectrics.

Very recently, two representative ferromagnetic Weyl semimetals, the Kagomé crystal Co3Sn2S2 and the Heusler compound Co2MnGa, have been identified by precise band‐structure measurements using angle‐resolved photoemission spectroscopy[ 22, 23 ] and scanning tunneling spectroscopy.[ 24 ] Benefiting from the large Berry curvature (BC) induced by the topological electronic structure,[ 3 ] both compounds have shown strong AHE and ANE behavior in transverse transport. The maximum measured anomalous Hall conductivity values (σxyA) of Co3Sn2S2 and Co2MnGa were above 1000 S cm−1,[ 17, 26, 27 ] whereas maximum anomalous Nernst thermopowers (S xy) of 7 µV K−1 for Co2MnGa[ 19, 20 ] and 3 µV K−1 for Co3Sn2S2 [ 28 ] were obtained,[ 19, 20, 28 ] approximately an order of magnitude higher than that of topologically trivial magnetic systems.[ 17, 19 ] These encouraging results demonstrate that ferromagnetic topological materials are excellent platforms for the observation of quantum anomalous Hall states in the 2D limit[ 17 ] and the realization of transverse thermoelectric conversion.[ 5, 29 ] In addition, theoretical calculations have strengthened the understanding of electronic topology in magnetic materials. A large BC, which is closely related to the number of topological nodal lines,[ 17, 22, 26 ] is thought to be the origin of the large AHE and ANE. Generally, magnetic topological materials with more mirror symmetries can host many topological nodal lines and thus, show a large BC.[ 3, 26 ]

Heusler compounds are a widely studied class of intermetallic materials with plenty of magnetic members that have high Curie temperature (T c).[ 3 ] Hence, they provide a good platform for the exploration of new ferromagnets with large anomalous transverse effects.[ 3 ] To date, the investigations of Heusler compounds for anomalous transport have mainly focused on Co‐based members with a T c of approximately 694 K[ 30 ] for Co2MnGa[ 19, 20, 22, 26 ] and Co2MnAl.[ 31, 32, 33 ] In contrast, low‐cost Fe‐based Heusler compounds with a much higher T c (up to 1000 K)[ 34, 35 ] have rarely been studied for anomalous transverse transport. Very recently, Noky et al.[ 36 ] performed a comprehensive study of the intrinsic anomalous transport for magnetic cubic Heusler compounds and predicted many new Fe‐based Heusler candidates with very large AHE and ANE, which have not yet been experimentally verified.

The synthesized crystals of Fe‐based Heusler compounds tend to have a strong anti‐site disorder,[ 37, 38 ] which is a structural defect that is generally undesirable for high‐performance unary and binary semiconductor devices.[ 39 ] However, in ternary and quaternary systems, the anti‐site disorder could be used to tune the electronic structure,[ 40, 41 ] and the electrical and magnetic properties of the crystalline materials.[ 39, 42 ] This raises an interesting question regarding the effect of the anti‐site disorder on anomalous transverse transport in magnetic topological materials. In previous studies on Co‐based magnetic Heusler compounds, the anti‐site disorder was thought to be unfavorable for increasing the AHE: compared to the large values in well‐ordered single crystals (SC) (900–1300 S cm−1 at 300 K),[ 22, 26, 32 ] Co2MnGa and Co2MnAl thin films with the anti‐site disorder generally had smaller σxyA values (100–800 S cm−1 at 300 K).[ 33, 43, 44, 45 ]

This study aimed to investigate the AHE and ANE behavior of high‐T c Fe‐based Heusler compounds Fe2 YZ (Y = Co, Ni; Z = Al, Ga).[ 36 ] Although the studied Fe2 YZ SC showed strong anti‐site disorder, they showed large σxyAvalues (250–700 S cm−1) and anomalous Nernst thermopower (2 µV K−1 near room temperature), comparable to those of the disordered Co2MnZ system.[ 33, 43, 44, 45 ] With the help of theoretical calculations, we argued that the anti‐site disorder in Fe2 YZ can benefit their anomalous transport. Moreover, the anomalous Nernst thermopower of Fe2 YZ shows an approximately linear increase with rising temperature, indicating higher values could be obtained at elevated temperatures considering their high T c values. These results demonstrate the potential of using low‐cost Fe‐based Heusler compounds for anomalous transport studies over a wide temperature range.

2. Results and Discussion

SC of Fe2 YZ were grown using the Bridgman method (as described in the Experimental Section). As shown in Figure 1a, the as‐grown crystals had a metallic luster. The crystallinity and orientation of the crystals were investigated using white‐beam backscattering Laue X‐ray diffraction (XRD) at room temperature, which showed distinct diffraction spots (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The polarized light and backscattered electron microscopy images (Figures S2 and S3, Supporting Information) indicated the chemical homogeneity of the grown crystals. The composition was examined using wavelength‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (WDX) and inductively coupled plasma‐optical emission spectroscopy (ICP‐OES) analyses. As summarized in Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information, the actual compositions of Fe2CoAl, Fe2NiAl, and Fe2NiGa SC were close to the nominally designed ones, whereas the Fe2CoGa SC deviated from the nominal composition with an excess of Fe and deficiency of Ga.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characterization of the as‐grown Fe2 YZ SC. a) Photographs of the crystals on a 1 × 1 mm2 grid. b) Temperature‐dependent magnetization M measured at a magnetic field of 0.01 T. c) Magnetic‐field‐dependent M per formula unit at 300 K. d) Temperature‐dependent longitudinal resistivity ρ xx. RRR = ρ xx(300 K)/ρ xx(2 K). e) Hall resistivity ρ yx versus magnetic field at 300 K.

For performing the magnetic and transport properties measurements, the SC were first cut into bars with the longest and the two shorter sides along the [100] and [011] directions, respectively. First, the magnetic properties of the as‐grown SC were evaluated. To obtain the T c values of the crystals, MT measurements were performed at a small magnetic field of 0.01 T. As shown in Figure 1b, the MT curves of Fe2CoAl, Fe2CoGa, and Fe2NiAl SC did not show a decrease with increasing temperature until 900 K, suggesting that they had T c values above 900 K. Fe2NiGa had the lowest T c among the studied SC, but still reached a value above 800 K, higher than that of Co2MnGa and Co2MnAl (around 694 K).[ 24, 26, 30 ] These magnetic properties of the Fe2 YZ SC studied here are consistent with previous studies of polycrystalline samples, which reported T c values of 990 K (Fe2CoAl),[ 34 ] 1165 K (Fe2CoGa),[ 35 ] 1010 K (Fe2NiAl),[ 34 ] and 845 K (Fe2NiGa).[ 38 ] Figure 1c shows the MH hysteresis loops for the four SC at 300 K. The crystals showed soft magnetic behavior and large saturation magnetizations with a maximum M S of 6.27 μ B found for Fe2CoGa. The saturation magnetization increased with decreasing temperature for all crystals. A maximum M S of 6.38 μ B at 2 K was obtained for Fe2CoGa (Figure S4a, Supporting Information).

After confirming that the fabricated Fe2 YZ SC were ferromagnetic with high T c, their transport properties were measured. The temperature‐dependent longitudinal resistivity ρ xx of the as‐grown Fe2 YZ SC showed metallic transport behavior (Figure 1d). All crystals show the residual‐resistivity ratio (RRR) near 1, which is attributed to strong carrier scattering due to the anti‐site disorder. The magneto‐resistivity of the Fe2 YZ SC was also measured, which showed a very weak dependence on the magnetic field, even at 2 K (Figure S4b, Supporting Information). The magnetic field dependence of the Hall resistivity ρ yx at 300 K is shown in Figure 1e. A fast change in ρ yx at low magnetic fields (below 1 T) was observed. For magnetic fields above 1 T, ρ yx was almost constant, suggesting that the anomalous component reached saturation. With decreasing temperature down to 2 K, the anomalous component of ρ yx showed a slight decrease for Fe2CoGa, Fe2NiAl, and Fe2NiGa but remained almost unchanged for Fe2CoAl (Figure S4c, Supporting Information). With the measured magnetic‐field‐dependent ρ xx and ρ yx, the Hall conductivity σ xy can be derived using: σ xy = ρ yx/(ρyx2 + ρxx2). As shown in Figure 2a, the σ xy values of Fe2CoAl, Fe2CoGa, and Fe2NiGa were similar at 300 K, while Fe2NiAl had a value almost double that of the other samples above 1 T. At 2 K, the magnetic‐field‐dependent σ xy was similar to that at 300 K (Figure S4d, Supporting Information). Using these data, σxyA was estimated by interpolating the high‐field σ xy data to the μ 0 H → 0 value. The estimated σxyA for Fe2 YZ shown in Figure 2b had high values of 250–750 S cm−1 in the temperature range of 2 to 300 K, which are smaller than those of ordered Co2MnZ SC,[ 22, 26, 32, 46 ] but comparable to those obtained for the corresponding thin films.[ 33, 43, 44, 45 ] Moreover, the σxyA showed a very weak temperature dependence (Figure 2b), which together with the σ xx‐independence of σxyA (Figure S5, Supporting Information) suggest that the σxyA of Fe2 YZ is mostly a result of the intrinsic contribution, that is, the BC.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Anomalous Hall transport properties in Fe2 YZ. a) Magnetic‐field‐dependent Hall conductivity σ xy at 300 K. b) Temperature‐dependent anomalous Hall conductivity σxyA. c) A comparison of the calculated σxyA and experimental data. The calculations were performed based on two ordered structures, that is, the Heusler structure (L21) and the inverse Heusler structure (X) shown in (e). d) Powder XRD patterns for the as‐grown SC. The inset shows the magnified pattern in the range of 28° ≤ 2θ ≤ 38°. e) Crystal structures of Heusler compounds with the X, L21, and B2‐type structures. The grey plane indicates the mirror plane in the structure. f) BC distribution in the Brillouin zone of Fe2NiAl assuming it crystallizes in the inverse Heusler and normal Heusler structures.

To understand the underlying anomalous transport mechanism, we performed density‐functional theory (DFT) calculations on Fe2 YZ (see the Experimental Section for details). Generally, Heusler compounds can crystallize in two types of ordered structures, that is, the normal Heusler structure and inverse Heusler structure, which belong to the space groups Fm 3¯ m (SG 225) and F 4¯3m (SG 216), respectively. These normal and inverse structures are often denoted as L21 and X, respectively, in the literature using the Strukturberichte notations.[ 47 ] According to previous studies,[ 37, 38 ] the X structure has lower total energy than the L21 structure for Fe2 YZ. To compare these hypothetical structures, we performed DFT calculations for Fe2 YZ, where the band structure, density of states (DOS), σxyA, and anomalous Nernst conductivity αyxA are presented in Figures S6S13, Supporting Information. The calculated band structures and DOS demonstrate the metallic behavior and the co‐existence of the complex non‐topological bands and linearly crossed topological bands near the Fermi level of Fe2 YZ. As for the L21 structure, the band inversion forms nodal line band structures in the m x, m y, and m z planes in the condition without the consideration of spin‐orbital coupling (SOC), such nodal lines can be broken by the combination of SOC and the applied magnetic field. In our measurement, the applied magnetic field is along [011] direction. It can break all the three mirror symmetries and form band anti‐crossings in k x = 0, k y = 0, and k z = 0 planes. The effective overlap between Fermi level and the anti‐crossing loops contributes to the intrinsic AHE and ANE. Since the three mirror planes of m x, m y, and m z are absent in the X structure, such kind of nodal lines don't exist in them. For comparison, the calculated and experimental values are shown together in Figure 2c. Interestingly, the calculated σxyA values for the X structure are smaller than those for the L21 structure, while the experimental data are located in between the two calculated values.

This inconsistency between the experimental and calculated data probably arises due to the fact that the as‐grown Fe2 YZ SC neither crystallizes in the X nor L21 structure. Figure 2d shows the powder XRD patterns of the as‐grown SC. One distinct feature is that the (111) diffraction peak, which is a characteristic peak for the X and L21 structures, was not present for Fe2CoAl, Fe2NiAl, and Fe2NiGa (the inset in Figure 2d shows magnified XRD patterns). The lack of the (111) diffraction peak in Heusler compounds usually indicates the existence of a B2‐type disorder (see detailed analysis in Table S3, Supporting Information).[ 47 ] In addition, the measured 57Fe Mössbauer spectra suggested strong disorder in the SC (Figure S14, Supporting Information). The B2‐type disorder was also previously reported for polycrystalline Fe2 YZ.[ 38, 48, 49 ] Hence, the B2‐type disorder commonly occurs in Fe2 YZ crystals, regardless of their crystallinity and synthesis method. For clarity, the evolution from the X and L21 structures to the B2‐type one is illustrated in Figure 2e. There could be two types of B2 structure: the B2a structure derived from the X structure with a mixture of Fe/Y in the Wyckoff sites (4a and 4b) and Fe/Z (4c and 4d sites); and the other B2b‐type derived from the L21 structure with a mixture of Y/Z at the 4c and 4d sites, while both Fe atoms are located at the 4a and 4b sites. The B2‐type Heusler compounds crystallize in the space group Pm 3¯ m (SG 221). Compared to the X structure (F 4¯3m), the B2‐type (Pm 3¯ m) and the L21 (Fm 3¯ m) structures have more mirror planes (grey planes in Figure 2e). The previous theoretical calculations suggest that more mirror planes result in more nodal lines and a larger BC, which is responsible for the high σxyA in magnetic Heusler compounds with the L21 structure.[ 26, 36 ] It is worth noting that a small (111) peak is still observed for the studied Fe2CoGa SC (Figure 2d), which indicates this sample might not exhibit a strong B2‐type disorder as the other three. This was thought to be related to its actual composition that is Fe2.19Co0.99Ga0.82 according to the WDX result (Table S1, Supporting Information). Then the comparison between the experimental data and the calculated ones (using the composition Fe2CoGa) might not be reasonable and thus not shown in Figure 2c.

In this study, the hypothetical ordered ground structure of Fe2 YZ was the X structure,[ 37, 38 ] which has fewer mirror planes than the L21 structure and thus, a smaller BC (Figure 2f) and calculated σxyA (Figure 2c). Furthermore, the as‐grown Fe2 YZ SC showed a strong B2‐type disorder, which could increase the number of mirror planes and thus enhance the BC. As a result, higher σxyA values were observed for the as‐grown SC compared to the calculated value based on the hypothetical X structure (Figure 2c). To further confirm this, the as‐measured SC were annealed for 14–21 days below the order‐disorder transition temperature (identified by DSC analysis; Figures S15 and S16, Supporting Information) in an attempt to promote the transformation of the crystals into the ordered X structure. Powder XRD for the annealed crystals was performed (Figure S17, Supporting Information), of which a small (111) peak was observed for the annealed Fe2NiGa, indicating a possible promotion to the ordered X structure. In addition, a split of the diffraction peak at high angles was observed for Fe2NiAl, suggesting the existence of phase separation after the annealing. Then, the σxyA values of the annealed Fe2 YZ crystals were measured. As shown in Figure 2c, a slight reduction in σxyA was observed after annealing (Figure 2c). This may indicate a smaller BC, as the more ordered Fe2 YZ crystals with the X structure have fewer mirror planes. Conversely, the higher σxyA values of the as‐grown Fe2 YZ SC could originate from the strong anti‐site‐disorder‐induced enhancement of the BC, as the B2‐type structure could have more mirror planes. This is in contrast to the Co2MnZ Heusler compounds, whose ground‐state structure is the L21 structure and the B2‐type disorder seems to suppress the σxyA.[ 33 ] It is worth noting that the sketch for the “B2 type structure” (Figure 2e) displays averaged electron densities on the corresponding positions. This would imply a high symmetry for this crystal. But this is only an effective symmetry seen on average over the disorder over a large number of unit cells. Whereas, a completely ordered L21‐type structure has these true mirror symmetries even on the scale of the conventional unit cell. That might explain why Co2MnZ compounds with the B2‐type disorder show decreased σxyA.[ 33 ]

The large BC in magnetic topological materials could generate an appreciable ANE in addition to a strong AHE, as demonstrated in Co2MnGa[ 19, 20 ] and Co3Sn2S2.[ 28 ] Figure 3a shows the magnetic‐field‐dependent Nernst thermopower S xy for the four Fe2 YZ SC measured near room temperature. Above 1 T, S xy reaches a saturated value, with a maximum value of above 2 µV K−1 for Fe2CoAl and Fe2CoGa. Although these values are smaller than that of the ordered Co2MnZ SC, they are comparable to those obtained in disordered Co2MnZ thin films.[ 33, 44 ] Figure 3b presents the Seebeck coefficient S xx of Fe2 YZ SC measured without an applied magnetic field, which showed an almost linear increase with temperature, typical for a metallic system. It is worth noting that S xx does not show an obvious change with the applied magnetic field, similar to the magnetic‐field‐independent behavior of ρ xx. The anomalous transverse thermoelectric conductivity α yx can be estimated using the measured longitudinal and Hall resistivities (ρ xx and ρ yx), and Nernst and Seebeck thermopowers (S xy, Sxx), that is, α yx = (S yx ρ xx – S xx ρ yx)/(ρ xx 2 + ρ yx 2). Figure 3c shows the calculated α yx near room temperature. The anomalous component αyxA of all four Fe2 YZ SC reached values above 0.5 A m−1 K−1, with a maximum value of 1.7 A m−1 K−1, which is approaching the maximum value obtained in the representative magnetic Weyl systems Co3Sn2S2 and Co2MnZ.[ 28, 33 ] In addition to the thermoelectric transport properties, the thermal conductivity κ for as‐grown Fe2CoAl, Fe2CoGa, and Fe2NiAl is presented in Figure 3d. Besides, the κ for Fe2NiGa after annealing is shown in Figure S18, Supporting Information. Near room temperature, Fe2 YZ showed a moderate κ of about 20 W m−1 K−1. Using the Wiedemann–Franz law, the electronic thermal conductivity was calculated as κ e = L 0 T/ρ xx, where L 0 is the constant Lorenz number and is equal to 2.44 × 10−8 W Ω K−2. As shown in Figure 3d, the other component κκ e, which is mainly contributed by the phonons, had similar values for Fe2 YZ over the whole studied temperature range. It is worth noting that the ordered Co2MnGa SC shows the phonon‐phonon Umklapp scattering (indicated by a T −1 dependence) dominated lattice thermal conductivity near 300 K,[ 20 ] but such a phenomenon is not observed in the studied Fe2 YZ crystals, which could be the result of the strong disorder that induces strong point defect scattering of phonons.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

a) Magnetic field dependence of the Nernst thermopower S xy for Fe2 YZ near 340 K, b) Temperature dependence of the Seebeck coefficient S xx, c) The estimated transverse thermoelectric conductivity α yx near room temperature, d) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity κ at 0 T.

As an extended discussion, it is meaningful to compare the anomalous transverse transport properties of Fe2 YZ and Co2MnZ, as the latter are the Heusler compounds with the largest AHE and ANE reported to date. Figure 4a shows a summary of σxyA values for a range of Heusler compounds as a function of their structure. Co2MnZ SC with the L21 structure show the largest σxyA, which is consistent with their large number of nodal lines and thus strong BC close to E F.[ 26, 36 ] In Co2MnZ thin films, B2‐type disorder was found, which suppresses the σxyA.[ 33 ] In contrast, hypothetical ordered Fe2 YZ is expected to be crystallized in the X structure and exhibits a lower σxyA due to the smaller BC (Figure 2c). However, a strong B2‐type disordered structure seems to be energetically favored and therefore experimentally observed. This B2‐type structure could somewhat increase the mirror planes in the fabricated SC (Figure 2e) and enhance the BC. As a result, the σxyAof Fe2 YZ SC reaches the values of Co2MnZ thin films (Figure 4a). This indicates that anti‐site disorder could help enhance anomalous transverse transport in Heusler compounds with the ground state structure of F 4¯3m. Moreover, since the single crystals of Fe2 YZ have already exhibited a strong anti‐site disorder, their thin films could have a similar level of anti‐site disorder and thus show a similar σxyA.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

a) Anomalous Hall conductivity |σxyA| measured at 300 K for Fe2 YZ, Co2MnGa[ 19, 22, 46 ] and Co2MnAl[ 32 ] SC, and Co2MnGa[ 43, 44, 45 ] and Co2Mn1‐ xSix [ 33 ] thin films. For comparison, the calculated σxyA for Fe2 YZ materials based on the X structure are also shown (denoted as Cal.). b) Temperature‐dependent Nernst thermopower S xy for Fe2 YZ SC at 2 T. The dashed lines indicate the approximately linear increase of S xy with increasing temperature.

The temperature‐dependent Nernst thermopower is presented in Figure 4b. For all four Fe2 YZ crystals, S xy increased almost linearly with increasing temperature. Considering that the intrinsic Berry‐curvature‐induced anomalous transport phenomena will be present while magnetic order exists in the magnetic topological materials, it can be expected that the S xy of Fe2 YZ will continue to increase with increasing temperature until around the T c. Since the T c of Fe2 YZ is much higher than those of Co2MnZ, the former could thus show advantages for high‐temperature thermoelectric energy conversion based on the ANE. In a very recent study, Li et al.[ 50 ] built a new monomaterial Nernst thermopile using the antiferromagnet Mn3Sn, suggesting a potential way for a new generation of thermopiles. It is worth noting that owing to the higher Curie temperature and larger Nernst thermopower, Fe2 YZ compounds could be good candidates for new Nernst thermopiles studies.

3. Conclusion

A comprehensive study of the anomalous transverse transport properties of four selected Fe‐based Heusler SC was performed. Large values of 250–750 S cm−1 and S xy values of above 2 µV K−1 were observed near room temperature. The almost temperature‐independent σxyA values indicated that the anomalous transport originates from the intrinsic BC. The anti‐site disorder and its effect on BC and σxyA were discussed in relation to theoretical calculations. The anti‐site disorder in Fe‐based Heusler compounds might help to induce more mirror planes in the system and thus enhance the Berry‐curvature‐induced anomalous transport behavior. There are two conclusions from the current work which might inspire future studies: 1) Fe2 YZ thin films, which could have a similar anti‐site disorder as their single‐crystal counterparts, might exhibit similarly large anomalous transverse transport behavior; 2) The high T c of Fe2 YZ compounds guarantees a further increase in the anomalous Nernst thermopower at elevated temperatures. These results highlight low‐cost Fe‐based Heusler compounds as a new platform for anomalous Hall and Nernst transport studies with potential applications for future electronics and thermoelectrics.

4. Experimental Section

Single Crystal Growth and Characterization

SC of Fe2NiAl, Fe2CoAl, Fe2NiGa, and Fe2CoGa were grown using the Bridgman–Stockbarger crystal growth technique. First, 10 g of high‐purity elements (>99.9%) in a stoichiometric ratio were reacted using an arc melter under an argon gas atmosphere; this melting process was repeated 5 times. The as‐cast ingots were turned over after each melting process. Additionally, a Ti sponge was used as an oxygen scavenger to minimize oxygen contamination of the ingot. All ingots were subsequently sealed in quartz ampoules under argon gas atmosphere and further heat‐treated (Fe2NiAl: 900 °C for 4 days;[ 48 ] Fe2CoAl: 600 °C for 14 days;[ 51 ] Fe2NiGa: 800 °C for 14 days;[ 52 ] and Fe2CoGa: 900 °C for 10 days[ 53 ]) and then quenched in ice water. Then, the annealed ingots were crushed and packed into a custom sharp‐edged alumina tube (10 mm in inner diameter), which was sealed in a tantalum tube under an argon atmosphere (0.2 atm). The compound's melting point was determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC 404, NETZSCH) measurements (Figure S15, Supporting Information). The as‐sealed tantalum tubes were heated to 1500 °C for Fe2NiAl, 1550 °C for Fe2CoAl, 1400 °C for Fe2NiGa, and 1380 °C for Fe2CoGa, and then held there for 10 h to ensure homogeneity, and then slowly cooled to 900 °C. The single crystallinity was checked by white‐beam backscattering Laue XRD (Bruker D8 VENTURE) at room temperature. All samples showed sharp and well‐defined Laue spots that can be indexed with a single pattern, indicating the high quality of the as‐grown crystals. Powder XRD measurements were performed with Co Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.788965 Å) on powders obtained by grinding the SC. Quantitative electron probe microanalysis of the crystals was performed using a WDX spectrometer (Cameca SX 100) using the pure elements as standards. ICP‐OES analysis was performed using an Agilent 5100 SVDV ICP‐OES. The matrix‐matched standards for the calibration of the spectrometer were prepared from single‐element standards. Then, the 57Fe Mössbauer spectra of Fe2 YZ Heusler phases were measured at room temperature with a standard WissEl spectrometer which was operated in the constant acceleration mode and equipped with a 57Co/Rh source. Powdered samples containing approximately 10 mg cm−2 of Fe were obtained by intensive grinding of the SC, which were then diluted with boron nitride to ensure homogeneous distribution in acrylic glass sample containers. The data were evaluated with the MossWinn[ 54 ] program using the thin absorber approximation. Gaussian hyperfine field distributions were used to decompose the magnetic hyperfine patterns.

Magnetic and Electrical Transport Measurements

Magnetization measurements were performed using an MPMS Quantum Design vibrating sample magnetometer. The electrical transport properties were characterized by a Quantum Design physical property measurement system (PPMS) using the ACT option. A standard four‐probe method was used for all measurements. To correct for contact misalignment, the measured data were field symmetrized and antisymmetrized for longitudinal resistivity and Hall resistivity, respectively.

Thermoelectric and Thermal Transport Measurements

All thermal transport experiments were performed using the PPMS with the one‐heater two thermometer configuration. The Seebeck thermopower and thermal conductivity were measured using the thermal transport option (TTO) of the PPMS. The Nernst thermopower under a magnetic field was measured using the PPMS, an external nanovoltmeter, and a current source (Keithley) controlled by LabVIEW software. The temperature gradient was generated using a resistive heater, connected to a gold‐coated flat copper wire at one end of the sample. The thermal gradient ΔT was applied along the [100] direction of the crystal, while the magnetic field was applied along the [110] direction. The crystal was attached to a heat sink using another flat copper wire. For temperature gradient (ΔT) measurements, two gold‐plated copper leads were attached directly to the crystal using the silver epoxy. The distance between the thermometers was 2–3 mm. The ΔT was typically set to 1–3% of the base temperature. Two copper wires were attached to the transverse direction of the crystal using the silver epoxy to measure the Nernst voltage. The Seebeck thermopower was estimated using the relation S xx = V xT x, where V x is the longitudinal voltage. The Nernst thermopower was estimated as S xy = L x V y/(L yΔT x), where V y is the transverse voltage, L x and L y are the distance between two temperature leads, and the distance between two voltage wires, respectively. To correct the data for contact misalignment, the measured data were field antisymmetrized.

DFT Calculations

The theoretical investigations were conducted by employing ab initio calculations based on DFT as implemented in VASP.[ 55 ] In this code, plane waves and pseudopotentials were used as a basis set, and the exchange‐correlation potential was taken as the generalized gradient approximation (GGA).[ 56 ] The k mesh used for the integration over the Brillouin zone was 13 × 13 × 13. In the next step, Wannier functions were extracted from the DFT results using the Wannier90 package.[ 57 ] From these Wannier functions, a Tight‐Binding Hamiltonian H was constructed and used to evaluate the BC Ω in the system as:[ 18, 58, 59 ]

Ω=mnnHkimmHkjnijEnEm2 (1)

where |n〉 and En are eigenstates and eigenenergies of H. From this, the anomalous Hall conductivity is calculated as[ 18, 58 ]

σxy=e2nd3k2π3Ωxyzfn (2)

and the anomalous Nernst conductivity as[ 58, 60 ]

αxy=1Tend3k2π3ΩxyzEnEFfn+kBTln1+eEnEFkBT (3)

where fn is the Fermi distribution function, T is the actual temperature, and E F is the Fermi level. The k mesh for the integration over the Brillouin zone in this step was chosen as 301 × 301 × 301 to ensure converged results. The calculated σ xy used in Figure 2c were obtained from the Figures S6c–S13c, Supporting Information, by reading off the values at EE F = 0. The σ xy and α xy were calculated at 0 K and 300 K, respectively.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marcus Schmidt for the DSC measurements, Sylvia Kostmann and Monika Eckert for microstructure characterizations, and Anja Völzke for ICP measurements. This work was funded by the ERC Advanced Grant No. 742068 “TOPMAT”, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Project numbers 392228380 and 247310070 under SFB 1143. C. Fu acknowledges the support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0704902).

Mende F., Noky J., Guin S. N., Fecher G. H., Manna K., Adler P., Schnelle W., Sun Y., Fu C., Felser C., Large Anomalous Hall and Nernst Effects in High Curie‐Temperature Iron‐Based Heusler Compounds. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100782. 10.1002/advs.202100782

Contributor Information

Chenguang Fu, Email: chenguang_fu@zju.edu.cn.

Claudia Felser, Email: Claudia.Felser@cpfs.mpg.de.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Yan B., Felser C., Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2017, 8, 337. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu R., Zhang W., Zhang H.‐J., Zhang S.‐C., Dai X., Fang Z., Science 2010, 329, 61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manna K., Sun Y., Muechler L., Kübler J., Felser C., Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 244. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tokura Y., Yasuda K., Tsukazaki A., Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 126. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fu C., Sun Y., Felser C., APL Mater. 2020, 8, 040913. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen Y. L., Analytis J. G., Chu J.‐H., Liu Z. K., Mo S.‐K., Qi X. L., Zhang H. J., Lu D. H., Dai X., Fang Z., Zhang S. C., Fisher I. R., Hussain Z., Shen Z.‐X., Science 2009, 325, 178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hsieh D., Xia Y., Qian D., Wray L., Meier F., Dil J. H., Osterwalder J., Patthey L., Fedorov A. V., Lin H., Bansil A., Grauer D., Hor Y. S., Cava R. J., Hasan M. Z., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 146401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liang T., Gibson Q., Ali M. N., Liu M., Cava R. J., Ong N. P., Nat. Mater. 2014, 14, 280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shekhar C., Nayak A. K., Sun Y., Schmidt M., Nicklas M., Leermakers I., Zeitler U., Skourski Y., Wosnitza J., Liu Z., Chen Y., Schnelle W., Borrmann H., Grin Y., Felser C., Yan B., Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 645. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ali M. N., Xiong J., Flynn S., Tao J., Gibson Q. D., Schoop L. M., Liang T., Haldolaarachchige N., Hirschberger M., Ong N. P., Cava R. J., Nature 2014, 514, 205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mun E., Ko H., Miller G. J., Samolyuk G. D., Bud'ko S. L., Canfield P. C., Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 035135. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fu C., Guin S. N., Scaffidi T., Sun Y., Saha R., Watzman S. J., Srivastava A. K., Li G., Schnelle W., Parkin S. S. P., Felser C., Gooth J., Research 2020, 2020, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Son D. T., Spivak B. Z., Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 104412. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang X., Zhao L., Long Y., Wang P., Chen D., Yang Z., Liang H., Xue M., Weng H., Fang Z., Dai X., Chen G., Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 031023. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watzman S. J., McCormick T. M., Shekhar C., Wu S.‐C., Sun Y., Prakash A., Felser C., Trivedi N., Heremans J. P., Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 161404. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fu C., Guin S. N., Watzman S. J., Li G., Liu E., Kumar N., Süβ V., Schnelle W., Auffermann G., Shekhar C., Sun Y., Gooth J., Felser C., Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2813. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu E., Sun Y., Kumar N., Muechler L., Sun A., Jiao L., Yang S.‐Y., Liu D., Liang A., Xu Q., Kroder J., Süß V., Borrmann H., Shekhar C., Wang Z., Xi C., Wang W., Schnelle W., Wirth S., Chen Y., Goennenwein S. T. B., Felser C., Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nagaosa N., Sinova J., Onoda S., MacDonald A. H., Ong N. P., Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1539. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sakai A., Mizuta Y. P., Nugroho A. A., Sihombing R., Koretsune T., Suzuki M.‐T., Takemori N., Ishii R., Nishio‐Hamane D., Arita R., Goswami P., Nakatsuji S., Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 1119. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guin S. N., Manna K., Noky J., Watzman S. J., Fu C., Kumar N., Schnelle W., Shekhar C., Sun Y., Gooth J., Felser C., NPG Asia Mater 2019, 11, 16. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sakai A., Minami S., Koretsune T., Chen T., Higo T., Wang Y., Nomoto T., Hirayama M., Miwa S., Nishio‐Hamane D., Ishii F., Arita R., Nakatsuji S., Nature 2020, 581, 53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Belopolski I., Manna K., Sanchez D. S., Chang G., Ernst B., Yin J., Zhang S. S., Cochran T., Shumiya N., Zheng H., Singh B., Bian G., Multer D., Litskevich M., Zhou X., Huang S.‐M., Wang B., Chang T.‐R., Xu S.‐Y., Bansil A., Felser C., Lin H., Hasan M. Z., Science 2019, 365, 1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu D. F., Liang A. J., Liu E. K., Xu Q. N., Li Y. W., Chen C., Pei D., Shi W. J., Mo S. K., Dudin P., Kim T., Cacho C., Li G., Sun Y., Yang L. X., Liu Z. K., Parkin S. S. P., Felser C., Chen Y. L., Science 2019, 365, 1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morali N., Batabyal R., Nag P. K., Liu E., Xu Q., Sun Y., Yan B., Felser C., Avraham N., Beidenkopf H., Science 2019, 365, 1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.a) Chang C.‐Z., Zhang J., Feng X., Shen J., Zhang Z., Guo M., Li K., Ou Y., Wie P., Wang L.‐L., Ji Z.‐Q., Feng Y., Ji S., Chen X., Jia J., Dai X., Fang Z., Zhang S.‐C., He K., Wang Y., Lu L., Ma X.‐C., Xue Q.‐K., Science 2013, 340, 167; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ge J., Liu Y., Li J., Li H., Luo T., Wu Y., Xu Y., Wang J., Nat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 1280; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Deng Y., Yu Y., Shi M. Z., Guo Z., Xu Z., Wang J., Chen X. H., Zhang Y., Science 2020, 367, 895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Manna K., Muechler L., Kao T.‐H., Stinshoff R., Zhang Y., Gooth J., Kumar N., Kreiner G., Koepernik K., Car R., Kübler J., Fecher G. H., Shekhar C., Sun Y., Felser C., Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8, 041045. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shen J., Zeng Q., Zhang S., Sun H., Yao Q., Xi X., Wang W., Wu G., Shen B., Liu Q., Liu E., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000830. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guin S. N., Vir P., Zhang Y., Kumar N., Watzman S. J., Fu C., Liu E., Manna K., Schnelle W., Gooth J., Shekhar C., Sun Y., Felser C., Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mizuguchi M., Nakatsuji S., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Webster P. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1971, 32, 1221. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kübler J., Felser C., EPL 2016, 114, 47005. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li P., Koo J., Ning W., Li J., Miao L., Min L., Zhu Y., Wang Y., Alem N., Liu C.‐X., Mao Z., Yan B., Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sakuraba Y., Hyodo K., Sakuma A., Mitani S., Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 134407. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saito T., Nishio‐Hamane D., J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 075105. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang C., Casper F., Gasi T., Ksenofontov V., Balke B., Fecher G. H., Felser C., Hwu Y.‐K., Lee J.‐J., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 295001. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Noky J., Zhang Y., Gooth J., Felser C., Sun Y., NPJ Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 77. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kiss J., Chadov S., Fecher G. H., Felser C., Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 224403. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gasi T., Ksenofontov V., Kiss J., Chadov S., Nayak A. K., Nicklas M., Winterlik J., Schwall M., Klaer P., Adler P., Felser C., Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 064411. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schnepf R. R., Cordell J. J., Tellekamp M. B., Melamed C. L., Greenaway A. L., Mis A., Brennecka G. L., Christensen S., Tucker G. J., Toberer E. S., Lany S., Tamboli A. C., ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2027. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kandpal H. C., Ksenofontov V., Wojcik M., Seshadri R., Felser C., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 1587. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fu C., Yao M., Chen X., Maulana L. Z., Li X., Yang J., Imasato K., Zhu F., Li G., Auffermann G., Burkhardt U., Schnelle W., Zhou J., Zhu T., Zhao X., Shi M., Dressel M., Pronin A. V., Snyder G. J., Felser C., Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bruski P., Erwin S. C., Ramsteiner M., Brandt O., Friedland K. J., Farshchi R., Herfort J., Riechert H., Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 140409. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Markou A., Kriegner D., Gayles J., Zhang L., Chen Y.‐C., Ernst B., Lai Y.‐H., Schnelle W., Chu Y.‐H., Sun Y., Felser C., Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 054422. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Park G.‐H., Reichlova H., Schlitz R., Lammel M., Markou A., Swekis P., Ritzinger P., Kriegner D., Noky J., Gayles J., Sun Y., Felser C., Nielsch K., Goennenwein S. T. B., Thomas A., Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 060406. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tong S., Zhao X., Wei D., Zhao J., Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 184434. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu L., Li X., Ding L., Chen T., Sakai A., Fauqué B., Nakatsuji S., Zhu Z., Behnia K., Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 180404. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Graf T., Felser C., Parkin S. S. P., Prog. Solid State Chem. 2011, 39, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang Y. J., Wang W. H., Zhang H. G., Liu E. K., Ma R. S., Wu G. H., Phys. B 2013, 420, 86. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ducher R., Kainuma R., Ishida K., J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 463, 213. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li X., Zhu Z., Behnia K., Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2100751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Coelho A. A., Imaizumi M., Laks B., Araújo A. A., Mota M. A., Gama S., Jafelicci M., Varanda L. C., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 272, 769. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nejadsattari F., Stadnik Z. M., Przewoźnik J., Buschow K. H. J., Phys. B 2015, 477, 113. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jaggi N. K., Rao K. R. P. M., Grover A. K., Gupta L. C., Vijayaraghavan R., Le Khoi D., Hyperfine Interact. 1978, 4, 402. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Klencsár Z., Kuzmann E., Vértes A., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1996, 210, 105. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kresse G., Furthmüller J., Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mostofi A. A., Yates J. R., Lee Y.‐S., Souza I., Vanderbilt D., Marzari N., Comput. Phys. Commun. 2008, 178, 685. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xiao D., Chang M.‐C., Niu Q., Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Thouless D. J., Kohmoto M., Nightingale M. P., den Nijs M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 405. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xiao D., Yao Y., Fang Z., Niu Q., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 026603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Advanced Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES