Abstract
Measurement of the population's general knowledge of the coronavirus vaccine is very important to improve public acceptance and decrease vaccine hesitancy in confronting the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards the coronavirus vaccine. Data were collected using an online survey, in the form of a structured questionnaire, conducted during April–May 2021 in Egypt, and subjects from all over Egypt participated. The questionnaire was divided into three parts to assess the knowledge and attitude regarding coronavirus. The first part was to assess participants’ experience about coronavirus infection (eight items), the second was to assess the health beliefs about coronavirus and vaccine (16 items) and the third was to assess general knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards vaccine (28 items). A total of 871 (465 females) participants participated, 81% of them were still committed to the precautionary measures for protection. Eighty‐eight percent of them accepted to take the vaccine. Eighty‐three percent of the participants answered that they will encourage family, friends, and colleagues to get the vaccine. Ninety‐four percent knew that the coronavirus vaccine provides immunity against infection for a period of 6–12 months. 91.9% believed that the current infection with coronavirus is one of the main contraindications to vaccination. Eighty‐nine percent believed that both pregnant women and chronic disease patients can get vaccinated and also that there is no specific age for a specific type of vaccination. Ninety‐four percent of them knew that subjects taking immunosuppressive drugs should be prescribed Sinopharm, not AstraZeneca vaccine. The median score of this survey was 20/22 regarding knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine. Overall, the study participants had good knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine and accepted to take the vaccine, which indicates the highly commendable efforts to confront the coronavirus.
Keywords: COVID‐19 vaccine, Egypt, FDA, public awareness
Highlights
Measurement of the population's general knowledge of the coronavirus vaccine is very important to improve public acceptance and decrease vaccine hesitancy to confront the disease.
Overall, the study participants had good knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine and accepted to take the vaccine which indicates the highly international efforts to confront the coronavirus.
1. INTRODUCTION
The hesitation towards vaccination with the COVID‐19 vaccine remains a problem worldwide. Lack of clinical trials for the vaccine, fear of vaccine side effects, and rumors of the presence of active viruses in vaccines are some leading obstacles that obstruct the success of the COVID‐19 vaccine campaign. Vaccine hesitancy is a major obstacle in the face of the COVID‐19 vaccination programs. 1
As the lockdown is not possible for some countries because it disrupts economic conditions, vaccination may be the way to limit the pandemic infection. Due to poor knowledge between populations about types of vaccine, its dosing recommendations, and the poor commitment to hygiene practices, the national and international health organizations are organizing campaigns to increase the public awareness level about the COVID‐19 vaccines. 2 , 3 The vaccination program campaigns include advertisements on social media and television to increase the population's awareness of COVID‐19 vaccines and show the importance of public vaccination to limit the spread of coronavirus infections. 1
At the beginning of the availability of the vaccine doses, there was little vaccination program campaign coverage, providing the opportunity to study the public awareness with COVID‐19 vaccines. But now, there is more coverage and an increase in public awareness. 4 , 5 This study aimed to evaluate the public awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding the COVID‐19 vaccines.
2. METHODS
2.1. The study design
An online survey was conducted during April–May 2021 in Egypt.
2.2. Sampling technique
An online survey was applied and the participants were included from all over Egypt to take part in the study.
2.3. Data collection
Data were collected using an online survey in the form of a structured questionnaire to collect the data from all over Egypt. The time required to fill the questionnaire was 15 min. The questionnaire items were designed according to the information and instructions published by Food and Drug Administration. 6
The questionnaire was divided into four parts:
-
1.
Participants' demographic data: age in year, gender, marital status, educational level, current place of residence (city or country), job.
-
2.
Participants’ experience about coronavirus infection.
-
3.
Health beliefs about coronavirus and its vaccine among participants.
-
4.
General knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards the vaccine.
Responses to the last three parts of the survey were mostly written as (Yes), (No), and (I don't know). For the assessment of the total knowledge; the participant was given a score = 1 if he/she answered the question correctly and zero score if he/she could not report the correct answer or did not know the correct answer to end up with a total ranging from 0 to 22. Finally, the participant was classified as having good knowledge about the disease if he/she scored >18 (>80%) points and not having good knowledge if the score was less than this as was suggested previously. 2 , 3
3. RESULTS
3.1. Participants' demographic data
A total of 871 (465 females) participants completed the study. The majority of them were in the age group of 35–45 years (44.8%). 63.8% of them were married and graduated from College; 50% were working in jobs other than the medical field and 74.1% were living in cities. Table 1 shows the participant's demographic data percentages.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Percentage |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 46.6 |
Female | 53.4 |
Age (years) | |
18–35 | 29.3 |
35–45 | 44.8 |
45–55 | 20.7 |
>55 | 5.2 |
Educational level | |
Colleague student | 15.5 |
Bachelor | 63.8 |
Master/PhD | 20.7 |
Marital status | |
Unmarried | 24.1 |
Married | 63.8 |
Divorced | 5.2 |
Widower | 6.9 |
Current place of residence | |
City | 74.1 |
Country | 25.9 |
Job | |
No work | 17.2 |
I work in the medical field | 32.8 |
I work in another field | 50 |
3.2. Participant's experiences with coronavirus infection
The majority of the participants (89.2%) answered that they were infected with the coronavirus. 74.1% answered that they do not have chronic diseases. Of all participants, 89% had one of their close family members infected with the coronavirus. It took about 3–4 weeks for someone in the family of 54.1% of subjects to recover from a coronavirus infection and more than 4 weeks for 43.2% of the participants. Fifty‐four percent have one of their family members needed to be hospitalized after contracting a coronavirus infection. Post‐COVID‐19 syndromes which are reported for their family were: 73% were exhausted, 78.2% were depressed, 21.6% had increased blood sugar levels, 32.4% had inflammation or redness of the eye, 10.8% developed blood clots, and 67.6% suffered from shortness of breath, 78.4% cough, 64.9% chest pain, 51.4% difficulty concentrating or thinking, 51.2% an increase in heart rate, 16.2% hair loss, 27% nausea and 32.5% headache, 51.4% taste problems, and 45.9% smell problems. However, 24.3% did not suffer from any post‐COVID‐19 syndromes. 48.5% of the participants had died case with coronavirus in their family. The majority of the participants (81%) are still committing to the precautionary measures for protection from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Table 2 shows the participant's experiences with coronavirus infection.
Table 2.
Question | % |
---|---|
1. Have you infected with the coronavirus? | |
•Yes | 89.2 |
•No | 10.8 |
2. Do you have chronic diseases (such as diabetes, hypertension, heart, lung, and kidney disease)? | |
•Yes | 25.9 |
•No | 74.1 |
3. Has any of your close family members been infected with coronavirus? | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 11 |
4. How long did it take for someone in your family to recover from a corona infection? | |
•1–2 weeks | 2.7 |
•3–4 weeks | 54.1 |
•More than 4 weeks | 43.2 |
5. Did any of your family members need to be hospitalized after contracting a corona infection? | |
•Yes | 54 |
•No | 46 |
6. Did any of your family members suffer from any complications after recovering from the corona infection? | |
•He did not suffer from any effects | 24.3 |
•Exhaustion | 73 |
•Shortness of breath | 67.6 |
•Cough | 78.4 |
•Chest pain | 64.9 |
•Difficulty concentrating or thinking | 51.4 |
•Depression | 78.2 |
•Increase in heart rate | 51.2 |
•Smell problems | 45.9 |
•Taste problems | 51.4 |
•High blood sugar levels | 21.6 |
•Inflammation or redness of the eye | 32.4 |
•Blood clots | 10.8 |
•Hair loss | 16.2 |
•Nausea | 27 |
•Headache | 32.5 |
7. Has any of your family members died of corona infection? | |
•Yes | 48.5 |
•No | 51.5 |
8. Are you still committed to the precautionary measures for protection from COVID‐19 infection? | |
•Yes | 81 |
•No | 8 |
•To some extent | 11 |
3.3. Health beliefs about coronavirus and vaccine
Eighty‐nine percent answered that person can be infected with coronavirus more than one time. Of all participants, 86.5% believed that people who have been vaccinated against the coronavirus may get coronavirus infection again; 62% believed that herd immunity is enough to protect everyone from the coronavirus, and 79% thought that immunity after infection with the virus is better than vaccine immunity. Of all participants, 44.8% answered that the effectiveness of the current vaccines for the coronavirus is high, 48.3% answered that it is moderate and 6.9% answered that it is low. The majority of the participants (82.8%) knew that it is necessary to wear masks after taking the coronavirus vaccine and 81% answered that it is necessary to take the coronavirus vaccine even if the person has already been infected with the coronavirus. Of all participants, 69% believed that the vaccine itself may infect them with coronavirus; 93% believed that the vaccine will eradicate the coronavirus pandemic and 96% answered that the vaccine is the best way to protect against the coronavirus and its complications. Of all participants, 86% have doubts about vaccines in general without specific reasons, 81% were concerned about the effectiveness of the coronavirus vaccine, and concerned that there is not enough clinical data about the vaccine. 84.5% were concerned about the side effects of the coronavirus vaccine. 46.5% of the participants answered that they do not need the vaccine because they take the preventive measures seriously. Table 3 shows the health beliefs about coronavirus and vaccines.
Table 3.
Question | % |
---|---|
1. Do you think that a person can be infected with corona more than once? | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 11 |
2. Do you think that people who have been vaccinated against the coronavirus may get corona infection again? | |
•Yes | 86.5 |
•No | 8.3 |
•May be | 5.2 |
3. Is herd immunity enough to protect everyone from the coronavirus? | |
•Yes | 62 |
•No | 22.5 |
•I don't know | 15.5 |
4. The effectiveness of the current vaccines for the coronavirus is | |
•High | 44.8 |
•Moderate | 48.3 |
•Low | 6.9 |
5. Is it necessary to wear masks after taking the coronavirus vaccine? | |
•Yes | 82.8 |
•No | 10.3 |
•May be | 6.9 |
6. Is it necessary to take the coronavirus vaccine even if you have already been infected with the coronavirus? | |
•Yes | 81 |
•No | 15.5 |
•May be | 3.5 |
7. I think immunity after infection with the virus is better than immunity after taking the vaccine? | |
•True | 79 |
•False | 21 |
8. I think the vaccine itself infects us with the coronavirus | |
•True | 69 |
•False | 31 |
9. I think a vaccine will eradicate the coronavirus pandemic | |
•True | 93 |
•False | 7 |
10. I think that the vaccine is the best way to protect against the coronavirus and its complications? | |
•True | 96 |
•False | 4 |
11. I have doubts about vaccines in general without specific reasons? | |
•Yes | 86 |
•No | 14 |
12. I am Concerned about the effectiveness of the coronavirus vaccine | |
•Yes | 81 |
•No | 19 |
13. I am concerned that there is not enough clinical data | |
•Yes | 81 |
•No | 19 |
14. I am concerned about the side effects of the coronavirus vaccine | |
•Yes | 84.5 |
•No | 15.5 |
15. I do not need the vaccine because I take the preventive measures seriously | |
•Yes | 46.5 |
•No | 53.5 |
3.4. General knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards vaccine
The majority of the participants (88%) answered that they will take the vaccine if available. 58.6% of the subjects were sure that they do not have an allergy to vaccines and 53.4% answered that they are not obligated to take the coronavirus vaccine in their workplace. There was a gap difference in the result of the question “Where do you get your information about the coronavirus vaccine?” 50% answered that they got their information from Ministry of Health instructions, 20.7% from the media, 15.5% from social media, 10% from the circle of acquaintances and friends. The majority of the participants (94%) knew that the coronavirus vaccine provides immunity against infection for a period of 6–12 months. Eighty‐six percent answered that they will take the vaccine to protect themselves from serious infection with the coronavirus, 88% answered that they will be vaccinated to protect those close to them from contracting the coronavirus and 83% said that they will encourage family, friends, and colleagues to get the vaccine. The majority of the participants (73%) believed that the vaccine should be mandatory for everyone.
91.9% knew that the current infection with coronavirus is one of the main contraindications to vaccination and 94.6% knew the current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within 1 year are also contraindications to vaccination. Also, 91.5% knew that one of the contraindications to getting the coronavirus vaccine is to have any other vaccination within the last 14 days. The majority of the participants (94%) agreed that the vaccine is not for people less than 18 years of age. 86.5% knew that breastfeeding mothers for children under 6 months are warned to receive the coronavirus vaccine. Eighty‐nine percent agreed that pregnant women and chronic disease patients can get vaccinated and also agreed that there is no specific age for a specific type of vaccination. The majority of the participants (86.5%) said that those recovering from coronavirus can receive the vaccine after approximately 3 months. The item “Who receives the first dose and then becomes infected with the virus must wait until he recovers and then receives the second dose” was approved by 97% of the participants. The majority of the participants (92%) knew that there was no scientific basis for taking aspirin or anticoagulant drugs with the AstraZeneca vaccination. “Anti‐allergic or cortisone is used if any allergic symptoms occur within the first 15 min of vaccination” was known by 91%. Ninety‐four percent of the subjects believed that there is no need to do an immunoglobulin G (IgG) test after or before receiving the vaccination and agreed that cases that take immunosuppressive drugs are prescribed Sinopharma. For the example “In cases of kidney transplantation receiving immunosuppressive drugs, Sinopharm is prescribed only” 91.9% answered “Yes.” However, 97.3% agreed that “Cases of hemodialysis can receive AstraZeneca” and agreed that “HIV/AIDS patients receive immunostimulating drugs can receive any type of vaccination.” Also, 94.5% agreed that there is no scientific basis that whoever received the vaccination is isolated because it is a cause of transmission of infection. Eighty‐nine percent believed that the effect of the vaccination begins 2 weeks after receiving the second dose. Table 4 shows the general knowledge, attitude, and practices of the participants towards vaccine
Table 4.
Question | % |
---|---|
1. Do you have an allergy to vaccines? | |
•Yes | 24.1 |
•No | 58.6 |
•May be | 17.2 |
2. Are you obligated to take the coronavirus vaccine in your workplace? | |
•Yes | 53.4 |
•No | 46.5 |
3. Where do you get your information about the coronavirus vaccine? | |
•I don't get information from anywhere | 3.4 |
•Social media | 15.5 |
•The media | 20.7 |
•Ministry of Health instructions | 50 |
•Circle of acquaintances and friends | 10 |
4. If a vaccine against the coronavirus is available, will you take the vaccine? | |
•Yes | 88 |
•No | 7c |
•May be | 5 |
5. Coronavirus vaccine provides immunity against infection for a period of 6–12 months | |
•Yes | 94 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 6 |
6. I will take the vaccine to protect myself from serious infection with the coronavirus | |
•Yes | 86 |
•No | 14 |
7. I will be vaccinated to protect those close to me from contracting the coronavirus? | |
•True | 88 |
•False | 12 |
8. Are you willing to encourage family, friends, and colleagues to get the vaccine? | |
•Yes | 83 |
•No | 17 |
9. Do you think that the vaccine should be mandatory for everyone? | |
•Yes | 73 |
•No | 27 |
10. The current infection with corona is one of the main contraindications to vaccination | |
•Yes | 91.9 |
•No | 2.7 |
•I don't know | 5.4 |
11. One of the contraindications to vaccination is a current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within one year of vaccination | |
•Yes | 94.6 |
•No | 2.7 |
•I don't know | 2.7 |
12. One of the contraindications to getting the corona vaccine is to have any other vaccination within the last 14 days | |
•Yes | 91.5 |
•No | 5 |
•I don't know | 3.5 |
13. Breastfeeding mothers for children under 6 months are warned to receive the Corona vaccine | |
•Yes | 86.5 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 13.5 |
14. It is possible for a pregnant woman to get vaccinated | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 1 |
•I don't know | 10 |
15. All chronic diseases do not prevent vaccination | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 6 |
•I don't know | 5 |
16. There is no specific age for a specific type of vaccination | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 3 |
•I don't know | 8 |
17. The vaccine is not for people under 18 years of age | |
•Yes | 94 |
•No | 3 |
•I don't know | 3 |
18. Those recovering from corona can receive the vaccine after approximately 3 months | |
•Yes | 86.5 |
•No | 5.4 |
•I don't know | 8.1 |
19. Whoever receives the first dose and then becomes infected with the virus must wait until he recovers and then receive the second dose | |
•Yes | 97 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 3 |
20. There is no scientific basis for taking aspirin or anticoagulant drugs with the AstraZeneca vaccination | |
•Yes | 92 |
•No | 3 |
•I don't know | 5 |
21. Anti‐allergic or cortisone is used if any allergic symptoms occur within the first 15 min of vaccination | |
•Yes | 91 |
•No | 3 |
•I don't know | 6 |
22. There is no need to do an IGg test after or before receiving the vaccination | |
•Yes | 94 |
•No | 1 |
•I don't know | 5 |
23. There is no scientific basis that whoever received the vaccination is isolated because it is a cause of transmission of infection | |
•Yes | 94.5 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 5.5 |
24. Cases that take immunosuppressive drugs are prescribed Sinopharm | |
•Yes | 94 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 6 |
25. Cases of hemodialysis can receive AstraZeneca | |
•Yes | 97.3 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 2.7 |
26. In cases of kidney transplantation receiving immunosuppressive drugs, Sinopharm is prescribed only | |
•Yes | 91.9 |
•No | 2.7 |
•I don't know | 5.4 |
27. HIV/AIDS patients receive immunostimulating drugs, so it is possible to receive any type of vaccination | |
•Yes | 97.3 |
•No | 0 |
•I don't know | 2.7 |
28. The effect of the vaccination begins 2 weeks after receiving the second dose | |
•Yes | 89 |
•No | 5 |
•I don't know | 6 |
3.5. Total knowledge
The median score of this survey was 20/22 regarding knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine. This indicates that the participants had satisfactory knowledge about the vaccine.
4. DISCUSSION
The COVID‐19 pandemic is still threatening the world. A vaccine is a great hope to find a solution to control the virus infection. Many coronavirus vaccines are now available. However, to be effective, a vaccine must be acceptable and usable among the majority of the population. 7
The items of the questionnaire are inclusive as it includes the participant's experience about coronavirus infection, health beliefs about coronavirus and its vaccine and the general knowledge, attitude and practices of the participants towards the vaccine.
The distribution of the demographic data of the subjects showed a higher percentage of females, married, city dwellers, graduated from college, and work in jobs other than the medical field. This indicates that females have more fears, more care toward the infection, and are more interested to share and test their knowledge about the coronavirus vaccine.
Knowing the cause is the first step to promote public education. 8 Public knowledge includes disease transmission, preventive considerations, and vaccine information are important to promote vaccine acceptance and decrease the vaccine hesitancy among the population to eradicate the coronavirus infection. 8 , 9
Nearly 90% of the respondents were classified as knowledgeable about the vaccine and have a positive attitude towards getting the vaccine. We used a certain cutoff point (>80%) to classify that the participant had satisfactory knowledge about the coronavirus. Previous studies, in contrast, showed a low level of acceptance of the vaccine in Egypt, 7 , 9 , 10 which demonstrates the successful role of awareness campaigns in increasing citizens' awareness of the vaccine and increasing their acceptance.
The participants who were previously infected with coronavirus, had a chronic disease or had one of his family hospitalized after contracting a coronavirus infection, were highly concerned about the coronavirus infection and so, showed high acceptance for the vaccine. Those understanding COVID‐19 as a dangerous disease were also more intent to take the COVID‐19 vaccine. Increasing the public knowledge about the safety of the COVID‐19 vaccine should be the point of interest to reach high vaccine usage. 11
Most of the participants’ families who were infected with coronavirus suffered from post‐COVID‐19 syndrome. Cough and depression are the most common post‐COVID‐19 syndromes in this study. 12 Depression is the most common neuropsychiatric post‐COVID‐19 disorder. 13 Previous studies found that about 10% of COVID‐19 patients had a persistent cough for 4 months after disease recovery. 14 , 15 , 16
The majority of the participants were committed to the precautionary measures for protection from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, which indicates their awareness of the dangers of the virus and their fear of being infected. Nearly 86% of the respondents believed that people who have been vaccinated against the coronavirus may get the infection again. It was reported that reinfection with coronavirus for the vaccinated individuals is possible with relatively mild symptoms and a reduced rate of hospitalization. 17
About two‐thirds of their respondents answered “yes” to the question “Is herd immunity enough to protect everyone from the coronavirus?” People become immune if they were infected or get vaccinated. It was reported that to reach herd immunity, 86% of people should be vaccinated. 18
There were differences in people's confidence towards the efficacy of the vaccine, which appeared in the gap difference in answering the question “The effectiveness of the current vaccines for the coronavirus is…” were 44.8% answered “high,” 48.3% answered “moderate” and 6.9% answered, “low.” That indicates the importance of building trust in COVID‐19 vaccines between the populations. This can be achieved by launching advertising campaigns and displaying the available information about the vaccine in all transparency. 9
Communities should listen to problems, find answers to the questions, and clear any misinformation. 19 As public trust in vaccination is relatively low, the COVID‐19 vaccination program can succeed if there is a belief that the available vaccines are safe and effective. 20 Lucia et al. confirmed the need for transparency and to give answers for concerns about vaccine safety. Supporting COVID‐19 vaccination through messages to the population and news releases and monitoring and controlling false news is crucial. 9 , 21 The majority of the participants believed that it is necessary to wear masks after taking the coronavirus vaccine. The public vaccine hesitancy may lead to a bad situation. Although COVID‐19 vaccines are now available, safety measures, for example, face masks, personal hygiene, and social distancing are still important to protect personal and public health against coronavirus. 22
Most of the participants thought that immunity after infection with the virus is better than immunity after taking the vaccine. Natural immunity and vaccine immunity are likely to play a role in reducing the spread of COVID‐19 and its associated mortality. 23 , 24 , 25
A lot of participants thought that the vaccine may infect them with the virus, were concerned that there is not enough clinical data, and were concerned about the side effects of the coronavirus vaccine. 9
Then, structured awareness campaigns should be organized to offer transparent knowledge about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and the technology that is used in the production of different types of vaccines. 7
These awareness campaigns are important to reduce the level of vaccine hesitancy, improve vaccine acceptance, and clear misinformation about the vaccine. A previous study showed differences in vaccine acceptance rates ranged from country to country as it reported that vaccine acceptance ranged from almost 93% in Tonga to less than 43% in Egypt. 7
Nearly half of the participants were obligated to take the coronavirus vaccine in their workplace such as in hospitals and governmental institutions. This heralds the end of the epidemic soon.
Half of the participants answered that they get their information about the coronavirus vaccine from Ministry of Health instructions. However, other studies showed that the social media and scientific articles published in the media were the most common sources of information. 10 , 26
Most of the participants accepted taking the vaccine and answered that they will encourage family, friends, and colleagues to get the vaccine. That indicates the success of the awareness campaigns. The fear of the infection with coronavirus and considering it a serious disease and the desire for family protection as shown in this study were the motivators for the people to take the vaccine. 9
The study of Natalia et al. reported that memory B‐ and T‐cell responses were maintained at least 6–8 months after infection. 27 Therefore, it is expected that the vaccine immunity may last for a period of 6–12 months. Ninety‐four percent of the participants answered “yes” to the question “Coronavirus vaccine provides immunity against infection for a period of 6–12 months.”
A lot of participants believed that the vaccine should be mandatory for everyone. Like other studies, the vaccine should be mandatory for everyone if the threat to the public is serious and if there is confidence in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. 28 , 29
The majority of participants believed that current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within 1 year of vaccination is a contraindication to vaccination.
Pregnant women who wanted to be vaccinated must discuss with their physician and weigh the potential risks and benefits of vaccination according to their health cases. However, for persons who planning for pregnancy, there are no theoretical concerns related to the effects of the COVID‐19 vaccine on fertility. There is no need to delay pregnancy after the COVID‐19 vaccination. 30
It was known by the participants that children under the age of 18 are not vaccinated. This is because of the reduced chance of complications if they are infected. All chronic diseases do not prevent vaccination, was known by a lot of the participants. The main target of vaccine is to protect high‐risk individuals such as elderly people, those with chronic comorbid conditions, health care workers, and those who work in essentials industries. 31
The participants showed good knowledge about the COVID‐19 vaccines information published by Food and Drug Administration and vaccine program campaigns. 6 They knew that there is no specific age for a specific type of vaccination, those recovering from coronavirus infection can receive the vaccine after approximately 3 months, and those who receive the first dose and then becomes infected with the virus must wait until they recover and then receive the second dose.
“There is no scientific basis for taking aspirin or anticoagulant drugs with the AstraZeneca vaccination” was answered by a lot of participants. However, a previous study reported that early initiation of coagulation treatment results in a rapid response without thrombotic complications. 32
Similar to a previous study, the participants agreed also that antiallergic or cortisone is used if any allergic symptoms occur within the first 15 min of vaccination. 33 Also, they thought that there is no need to do an IgG test after or before receiving the vaccination. 34
There was an agreement in this study that cases that take immunosuppressive drugs should be prescribed Sinopharm. The inactivated vaccines have been used in cancer and immunosuppressive patients in the past with excellent safety profiles and they are theoretically the safest vaccine for these patients. 35 It was also known by the participants that cases of hemodialysis can receive AstraZeneca, cases of kidney transplantation receiving immunosuppressive drugs can receive Sinopharm only and HIV/AIDS patients who receive immunostimulating can receive any type of vaccination 35 (whereas the available vaccines in Egypt now are Sinopharm and AstraZeneca).
People and healthcare workers should be informed about new research and information regarding the coronavirus vaccine. Highly educated participants were better knowledgeable; their high level of education helps them in understanding educational messages. The higher educated persons have the ability to obtain knowledge about the vaccine from different sources, which cannot be obtained by lower educated ones.
5. LIMITATIONS
No face‐to‐face questionnaire was performed. Only an online survey was carried out which was easy as most were of young age compared to old, which is why most of the participants were young. Also, the uneducated or people who cannot deal with the online applications could not participate in the study.
6. CONCLUSION
The participants in the study had satisfactory knowledge regarding coronavirus and its vaccine. Although the participants were satisfied in terms of acceptance of the vaccine, there are some concerns about it due to insufficient clinical trials and fear of its side effects. The provision of sufficient information about the vaccines is important. Continuous training and education are needed to improve public vaccine acceptance and reduce its hesitancy.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Concept, Experiment, data entry, writing: Marwa O. Elgendy. Concept, planning of study design, and reviewing the manuscript: Mohamed E.A. Abdelrahim.
Elgendy MO, Abdelrahim MEA. Public awareness about coronavirus vaccine, vaccine acceptance, and hesitancy. J Med Virol. 2021;93:6535‐6543. 10.1002/jmv.27199
REFERENCES
- 1. Khan YH, Mallhi TH, Alotaibi NH, et al. Threat of COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: the need for measures to neutralize misleading narratives. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(2):603‐604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Elgendy MO, El‐Gendy AO, Abdelrahim MEA. Public awareness in Egypt about COVID‐19 spread in the early phase of the pandemic. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(12):2598‐2601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Elgendy MO, Abd Elmawla MN, Abdel Hamied AM, El Gendy SO, Abdelrahim MEA. COVID‐19 patients and contacted person awareness about home quarantine instructions. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(4):e13810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. La V‐P, Pham TH, Ho MT, et al. Policy response, social media and science journalism for the sustainability of the public health system amid the COVID‐19 outbreak. Sustainability. 2020;12(7):2931. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sayed AM, Khalaf AM, Abdelrahim MEA, Elgendy MO. Repurposing of some anti‐infective drugs for COVID‐19 treatment: a surveillance study supported by an in silico investigation. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;75:e13877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Stankevič OK. Commentary: the new coronavirus COVID‐19. Pacific J Med Sci, 2021;22. in press. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mannan DKA, Farhana KM. Knowledge, attitude and acceptance of a COVID‐19 vaccine: a global cross‐sectional study. Int Res J Bus Soc Sci. 2020;6(4):1‐23. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Elbur A, Alharthi A, Aljuaid A, Almalki NH. Knowledge of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS‐CoV) and its management: a survey among Saudi people in Taif; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. IOSR J Pharm. 2016;6(8):33‐39. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Saied SM, Saied EM, Kabbash IA, Abdo S. Vaccine hesitancy: beliefs and barriers associated with COVID‐19 vaccination among Egyptian medical students. J Med Virol. 2021;93(7):4280‐4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fares S, Elmnyer MM, Mohamed SS, Elsayed R. COVID‐19 vaccination perception and attitude among healthcare workers in Egypt. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:21501327211013303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Karlsson LC, Soveri A, Lewandowsky S, et al. Fearing the disease or the vaccine: the case of COVID‐19. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;172:110590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kamal M, Abo Omirah M, Hussein A, Saeed H. Assessment and characterisation of post‐COVID‐19 manifestations. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(3):e13746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sher L. Post‐COVID syndrome and suicide risk. QJM. 2021;114(2):95‐98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Stavem K, Ghanima W, Olsen MK, Gilboe HM, Einvik G. Persistent symptoms 1.5–6 months after COVID‐19 in non‐hospitalised subjects: a population‐based cohort study. Thorax. 2021;76(4):405‐407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Petersen MS, Kristiansen MF, Hanusson KD, et al. Long COVID in the Faroe Islands—a longitudinal study among non‐hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020:ciaa1792. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Song W‐J, Hui C, Hull JH, et al. Confronting COVID‐19‐associated cough and the post‐COVID syndrome: role of viral neurotropism, neuroinflammation, and neuroimmune responses. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:533‐544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rubin R. COVID‐19 Vaccines vs variants—determining how much immunity is enough. JAMA. 2021;325(13):1241‐1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dong M, He F, Deng Y. How to understand herd immunity in the context of COVID‐19. Viral Immunol. 2021;34(3):174‐181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. UNICEF . Social Science Support for COVID‐19: Lessons Learned Brief 3: Humanitarian Programme Recommendations for COVID‐19 Based on Social Sciences Evidence from the DRC Ebola Outbreak Response. UNICEF; 2020.
- 20. al‐Maqdis, A.A.B., B.B.P.s. Congress, and B.B.S.T. Index . CAPMAS Central Authority for Public Mobilization and Statistics (Egypt) CFAD Tunisian Center for Training and Support CAOA Central Agency for Organization and Administration (Egypt).
- 21. Lucia VC, Kelekar A, Afonso NM. COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2020:fdaa230. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Su Z, Wen J, McDonnell D, et al. Vaccines are not yet a silver bullet: The imperative of continued communication about the importance of COVID‐19 safety measures. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021;12:100204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Good MF, Hawkes MT. The interaction of natural and vaccine‐induced immunity with social distancing predicts the evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic. mBio. 2020;11(5):e02617‐e02620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zawbaa HM, El‐Gendy A, Saeed H, et al. A study of the possible factors affecting COVID‐19 spread, severity and mortality and the effect of social distancing on these factors: machine learning forecasting model. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e14116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. El‐Gendy AO, Saeed H, Ali AMA, et al. Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine, antimalarial, age and gender relation to COVID‐19 spread and mortality. Vaccine. 2020;38(35):5564‐5568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Detoc M, Bruel S, Frappe P, Tardy B, Botelho‐Nevers E, Gagneux‐Brunon A. Intention to participate in a COVID‐19 vaccine clinical trial and to get vaccinated against COVID‐19 in France during the pandemic. Vaccine. 2020;38(45):7002‐7006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sherina N, Piralla A, Du L, et al. Persistence of SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific B and T cell responses in convalescent COVID‐19 patients 6–8 months after the infection. Med. 2021;2(3):281‐295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Savulescu J. Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk? J Med Ethics. 2021;47(2):78‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Graeber D, Schmidt‐Petri C, Schröder C. Attitudes on voluntary and mandatory vaccination against COVID‐19: evidence from Germany. PLOS One. 2021;16(5):e0248372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy, postpartum care, and COVID‐19 vaccination in 2021. JAMA. 2021;325(11):1099‐1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kaur SP, Gupta V. COVID‐19 vaccine: a comprehensive status report. Virus Res. 2020;288:198114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Thaler J, Ay C, Gleixner KV, et al. Successful treatment of vaccine‐induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT). J Thromb Haemostasis. 2021;19:1819‐1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. McDougle L, Hewlett D Jr, Hutchins SS, et al. Serving as trusted messengers about COVID‐19 vaccines and therapeutics. J Natl Med Assoc. 2021;113(1):6‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Jabal KA, Ben‐Amram H, Beiruti K, et al. Impact of age, ethnicity, sex and prior infection status on immunogenicity following a single dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine: real‐world evidence from healthcare workers, Israel, December 2020 to January 2021. Euro Surveill. 2021;26(6):2100096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Al‐shamsi HO. COVID‐19 vaccination for cancer patients, what oncologists and cancer patients need to know? J Oncol Res Rev Rep. 2020:3. [Google Scholar]