Dear Editor
In this study, we show a seven‐individual cluster belonging to the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage, imported into Italy by travelers from abroad. We isolated, for the first time, the authentic virus from one of these infected individuals and challenged it against 37 sera of BNT162b2 vaccinated volunteers. Here, we demonstrate that neutralization of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage was robust, even if significantly lower than that observed on SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1. Our findings underline that vigilance of SARS‐CoV‐2 genomic evolution is fundamental to limit the spread of new SARS‐CoV‐2 lineages to different countries.
Since autumn 2020, SARS‐CoV‐2 variants have emerged and spread globally. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classified them as a variant of interest (VOI), variant of concern (VOC), and a variant of high consequence. 1 In particular, VOI presents specific genetic markers predicted to affect transmission, diagnostic, therapeutics, or immune escape and are responsible for unique outbreak clusters or increased proportion of cases. 2
A new SARS‐CoV‐2 VOI, defined as B.1.621 lineage, emerged in January 2021 in Colombia. This lineage carries several Spike mutations, some are common with other VOC (E484K, N501Y, P681H) while others are new (R346K, Y144T, Y145S, and 146N insertion). 3 , 4 To date, the B.1.621 lineage is predominantly retrieved in Colombia, the United States, Spain, the Netherlands, and Denmark. 5
To monitor SARS‐CoV‐2 variants spread in the Brescia area (Northern Italy), a random genomic surveillance program of SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive samples was implemented through Sanger sequencing. On April 20, 2021 during SARS‐CoV‐2 genomic surveys, we detected a sequence characterized by B.1.621 lineage typical Spike mutations. A whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on this sample, confirming the B.1.621 lineage. Hence, all the contacts of this patient, suffering from unspecific symptoms, were traced allowing the identification of other six SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients, whose samples underwent WGS and were assigned to the B.1.621 lineage. These data define the first Italian cluster of the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage. The introduction of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage in the Brescia area was ascribed to a traveler coming from Colombia.
To assess the evolutionary relationships among these seven Italian SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage sequences on a global scale, a maximum likelihood tree was employed. All our sequences form a monophyletic cluster with the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 sequence from the United States (EPI_ISL_1581369) (Figure 1A). Figure 1B shows the key mutations in the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 Spike protein.
Figure 1.

Sequence analyses of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage in Italy and its sensitivity to the BNT162b2 vaccine. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree including the seven SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 lineage whole genomes from Brescia and 3176 whole‐genome sequences which are representative of the globally circulating SARS‐CoV‐2 strains until April 2021 retrieved from GISAID database. Brescia genomes of B.1.621 lineage are highlighted in green while other B.1.621 worldwide whole genomes are marked with violet circles; blue circles and red circles represent genomes not belonging to B.1.621 lineage detected in Italy and abroad, respectively. Support for branching structure is shown by bootstrap values at nodes; the Brescia cluster of B.1.621 lineage is zoomed in bold. (B) Amino acid (AA) comparison in the spike region of the Brescia (BS) B.1.621 isolate toward the Wuhan‐Hu‐1 (reference, Genbank accession number: NC_045512) and SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 (EPI_ISL_1220045) sequences. The one‐letter AA code has been used; ins indicates the presence of AA insertion; RBD, receptor‐binding domain. (C) Serum neutralization of authentic SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1 and B.1.621. Shown are the results of the neutralization test using sera obtained from 37 BNT162b2 vaccinated volunteers. Neutralization of the two authentic viruses was performed by cytopathic effect (CPE)‐based assay using a viral titer of 102 TCID50. The neutralization titer of each serum sample was calculated as the reciprocal of the highest dilution that protected more than 50% of cells from CPE. Sera with different neutralization titers against SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1 and B.1.621 isolates are connected by lines. Horizontal lines and the numbers over the bars indicate geometric mean titers (GM). The I bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t test and two‐tailed p values were calculated
In this study, we isolated for the first time the virus from the sample of the earliest positive patient and carried out a neutralization assay using the isolated virus soon after confirmation of its identity by WGS, and human sera collected between 10 and 20 days after the administration of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, which occurred 3 weeks after the first immunization. All sera efficiently neutralized the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 isolate (Figure 1C), demonstrating that this VOI is not a concern for vaccine efficacy. Indeed, neutralization of SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 was robust, even if significantly lower than that observed on SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.
Our data show that despite several mutations in Spike, SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.621 is neutralized by the BNT162b2 vaccine‐elicited antibodies. Moreover, they highlight the importance of properly quarantining people after travel abroad to avoid spreading newly emerging SARS‐CoV‐2 lineages to different countries.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Francesca Caccuri and Arnaldo Caruso. Methodology: Serena Messali, Anna Bertelli, Alberto Zani, and Francesca Caccuri. Investigation: Serena Messali, Anna Bertelli, Alberto Zani, and Francesca Caccuri. Data curation: Serena Messali and Giovanni Campisi. Formal analysis: Serena Messali, Anna Bertelli, and Giovanni Campisi. Supervision: Francesca Caccuri and Arnaldo Caruso. Writing—original draft: Anna Bertelli and Francesca Caccuri. Writing—review and editing: Arnaldo Caruso.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data have been deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database (accession numbers: EPI_ISL_3098720; EPI_ISL_3098721; EPI_ISL_3098722; EPI_ISL_3098723; EPI_ISL_3098724; EPI_ISL_3098725; EPI_ISL_3098726; EPI_ISL_3098727).
Serena Messali and Anna Bertelli contributed equally to this study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Abdool Karim SS, de Oliveira T. New SARS‐CoV‐2 variants—clinical, public health, and vaccine implications. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1866‐1868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . SARS‐CoV‐2 Variant Classifications and Definitions; 2021. Accessed May 24, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/variant-surveillance/variant-info.html#Interest
- 3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ecdc) . SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern as of 24 May 2021; 2021. Accessed May 24, 2021. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/variants-concern
- 4. Laiton‐Donato K, Franco‐Muñoz C, Álvarez‐Díaz DA, et al. Characterization of the emerging B.1.621 variant of interest of SARS‐CoV‐2. medRxiv. 2021; (preprint). 10.1101/2021.05.08.21256619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5. GISAID . Accessed May 24, 2021. https://www.gisaid.org/
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data have been deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database (accession numbers: EPI_ISL_3098720; EPI_ISL_3098721; EPI_ISL_3098722; EPI_ISL_3098723; EPI_ISL_3098724; EPI_ISL_3098725; EPI_ISL_3098726; EPI_ISL_3098727).
