Skip to main content
Genes & Diseases logoLink to Genes & Diseases
. 2020 Oct 23;8(6):759–768. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.10.005

MicroRNA-9 as a paradoxical but critical regulator of cancer metastasis: Implications in personalized medicine

Yichen Liu a,b,1, Qiong Zhao b,1, Tao Xi b, Lufeng Zheng b,∗∗, Xiaoman Li a,
PMCID: PMC8427239  PMID: 34522706

Abstract

Metastasis, is a development of secondary tumor growths at a distance from the primary site, and closely related to poor prognosis and mortality. However, there is still no effective treatment for metastatic cancer. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find an effective therapy for cancer metastasis. Plenty of evidence indicates that miR-9 can function as a promoter or suppressor in cancer metastasis and coordinate multistep of metastatic process. In this review, we summarize the different roles of miR-9 with the corresponding molecular mechanisms in metastasis of twelve common cancers and the multiple mechanisms underlying miR-9-mediated regulation of metastasis, benefiting the further research of miR-9 and metastasis, and hoping to bridge it with clinical applications.

Keywords: Cancer, Metastasis, MiR-9, Oncogene, Tumor suppressor

Introduction

Cancer is an uncontrolled growth disease, and significantly increases health and economic burden.1 Despite surgery and radiation therapy effectively control many cancers at the primary site, metastatic disease is the leading cause of cancer-related death.2 Therefore, it should be paid more attenuation to metastasis-targeted therapies in clinical. Metastasis is the final product of a multi-step cellular biological process, this process is called the “invasion-metastatic cascade”, in which tumor epithelial cells perforate the extracellular matrix, invade into blood vessels, arrest at distant organ sites and penetrate into the tissue parenchyma, eventually proliferating to form new tumor.3 The process of metastasis is very inefficient, only few cells that metastasize from the primary tumor can succeed in colonizing at a distance.4 However, metastasis is closely related to the poor prognosis and mortality. Thus, it is very important to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to cancer metastasis or find novel biomarkers for metastasis.

MiRNAs are a class of noncoding single-stranded RNA molecules encoded by endogenous genes with a length of approximately 22 nucleotides.5 It can bind to the 3′untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNA and regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. The biogenesis of miRNAs (microRNAs or miRs) is regulated by multiple steps including DROSHA-regulating nuclear generation of primary (pri-) miRNA, Exportin 5 transferring pri-miRNA to the cytoplasm, and pri-miRNA maturation in the cytoplasm by DICER.6 More than 60% of human protein-coding genes are regulated by miRNAs.7 Furthermore, miRNAs have been shown to play crucial roles in tumorigenesis, such as inflammation, stress response, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, differentiation, metastasis and invasion.8

MiR-9 has been shown to be aberrantly expressed in many cancer types and suppress gene expression involved in cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis, etc.9 For instance, ectopic expression of miR-9 inhibits the JAK/STAT3 pathway by targeting interleukin 6 (IL-6), resulting in decreased proliferation and migration of HeLa cells.10 And MiR-9 has been confirmed to inhibit proliferation of Glioblastoma multiforme cell lines by targeting the cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) but to promote migration by targeting neurofibromin 1 (NF1).11 In this review, we focus on the roles of miR-9 in cancer metastasis, expecting that it might be used as a biomarker or potential drug target for metastatic cancers.

MiRNAs and metastasis

MiRNAs hold a specific characteristic that one miRNA can regulate the expression of numerous genes and one target gene can be targeted by several miRNAs, making a complex regulatory pathway. MiRNAs may influence many aspects of tumor development, the association between miRNAs and cancer metastasis was firstly reported in 2007. Ma et al12 suggested that miR-10b is induced by the transcription factor Twist and positively regulates invasion and metastasis in breast cancer via targeting homeoboxD10 (HOXD10) directly. Then, lots of studies have shown that miRNAs can function as oncogenes or suppressors in cancer metastasis and coordinate multistep of metastatic process, incorporating migration, invasion, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), adhesion and motility of cancer cells.13,14 For example, Chen et al15 revealed that miR-130a promotes breast cancer cell migration and invasion via targeting FOSL1 and suppressing ZO-1. Lohcharoenkal et al16 reported that in melanoma, low level of miR-203 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with metastases, and its expression in vivo is shown to inhibit metastasis by regulating Slug. And several members of the miR-200 family were reported that can directly regulate the expression of key EMT-associated genes, such as ZEB1 and SIP1, suppressing EMT and tumor metastasis by downregulating E-cadherin.17 Furthermore, the important role of miR-9 in cancer metastasis is previously demonstrated by Ma et al18 and us as well.19, 20, 21 And since then there are many reports showing its role in tumor progression. Here, we reviewed the relationship between miR-9 and metastasis in twelve common metastatic cancers and the underlying mechanisms.

The promoting role of miR-9 in metastasis of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. It has been confirmed that 25%–50% of breast cancer patients eventually develop fatal metastasis, which can occur even decades after the tumor is diagnosed and removed.22 Ours and other studies have shown that miR-9 is found to be highly expressed in patients with lymph node metastasis compared to patients without it, and high level of miR-9 is related to poor disease- and distant metastasis-free survival in triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs).19,23,24 Additionally, a lot of studies provide evidences for the promoting role of miR-9 in breast cancer metastasis. For example, Shi et al25 described that miR-9 is overexpressed in MDA-MB-231 cells, a model of TNBC, which is more aggressive than MCF-7 cells, a luminal cell line with a weaker invasion ability. And Gravgaard et al,26 using in situ hybridization, found that miR-9 level is also higher in the distant metastases than corresponding primary tumors. These results suggest an explicit involvement of miR-9 in the metastatic process and confirm it as a relevant element in controlling metastatic breast cancer.

C-Myc exerts many physiological functions, such as promoting cell proliferation and apoptosis, contributing to the tumor onset and early growth.27 In terms of mechanism, several evidences indicated that miR-9 is engaged in c-Myc-mediated regulation on breast cancer. For example, Sun et al28 demonstrated the increased expression of miR-9 in mammary tumors of MMTV-c-Myc transgenic mice, a c-Myc-induced mouse model; Ma et al18 confirmed that expression of miR-9 is activated by MYC and MYCN, and miR-9 elevates cell motility and invasiveness via directly targeting the key metastatic-suppressing protein E-cadherin. The downregulation of E-cadherin sequentially activates β-catenin signaling, which promotes the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), resulting in tumor angiogenesis; on the other hand, the reduction of E-cadherin makes tumor cells sensitive to EMT-inducing signals produced by the tumor microenvironment, both of which in turn leading to metastatic dissemination. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the tumor-initiating cell population with ability to self-renew and multi-potential, and induce tumor genesis, expansion, resistance, recurrence, and metastasis process.29 Zhang et al30 showed that miR-7 is down-regulated in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) and can interfere cell invasion and metastasis, decrease the BCSC population and partially reverse EMT through targeting the oncogene, SETDB1, and then suppressing STAT3 expression, subsequently down-regulating the expression of c-Myc, twist, and miR-9. And both of twist and miR-9 can inhibit E-cadherin expression, which may explain the mechanisms whereby miR-7 reverses EMT in breast cancer and BCSCs. Moreover, miR-9 was indicated to elevate the generation of CSCs to profit an invasive phenotype.31 In addition to promote the metastasis of breast cancer through suppressing targeted genes, miR-9 could mediate the competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), which are defined as transcripts that cross-regulate each other by competing for shared miRNAs,32 and thus engaged in breast cancer metastasis. Like our previous studies suggested that there exists a competition of miR-9 between forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) 3′UTR and E-cadherin 3′UTR, and FOXO1 3′UTR can inhibit the metastases of breast cancer cells via restraining E-cadherin expression through miR-921, and the oncogene CYP4Z1 3′UTR could suppress the migration of breast cancer cells through competitively binding to miR-9 with E-cadherin.20

Furthermore, miR-9 could regulate other metastasis-related genes and signaling pathways beyond E-cadherin. Chen et al33 revealed that leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR), the downstream effector of the miR-9, suppresses breast cancer metastasis through triggering Hippo pathway by leading to the phosphorylation, cytoplasmic retention and functional inactivation of the transcriptional coactivator YES-associated protein (YAP). Notably, our previous study demonstrated that miR-9 promotes breast cancer EMT and metastasis via post-transcriptionally regulating STARD13 expression.19 D'Ippolito et al34 further explored that induction of endogenous miR-9 expression ligand-dependently stimulated by platelet-derived growth factor receptor Beta (PDGFRβ) facilitate the vasculogenic ability of TNBC in vitro and vivo, partially via directly repressing STARD13 expression, this work further confirms our results that miR-9 can target STARD13 in breast cancer.

In recent years, tumor cells-secreted miRNAs, which transferred by exosomes, have become a new mechanism for mediating tumor stroma crosstalk and metastasis. Exosomes are a subset of extracellular vesicles released from cells with diameters <100 nm, have been shown to carry sorts of molecules, including miRNAs.35 MiR-9 was firstly detected in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 exosomes by Vahid Kia et al and it was found that miR-9 is overexpressed in highly metastatic TNBC exosomes. Additionally, treatment of MCF-7 cells with MDA-MB-231 exosomes decreases the expression of miR-9-targeted genes PTEN and DUSP14, two critical tumor suppressors, and then induces metastatic behavior of recipient cells, this study indicates that miR-9 in breast cancer cells-derived exosomes can promote breast cancer metastasis.36

Taken together, miR-9 could induce the metastasis of breast cancer via different mechanisms (Fig. 1). And miR-9 is closely correlated with poor prognosis and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for invasive breast cancer patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The underlying mechanisms contributing to miR-9-mediated regulation on breast cancer metastasis. MiR-9 is regulated by PDGFR, MYC/MYCN, miR-7/c-Myc signal and promotes metastasis via targeting STARD13, E-cadherin, FOXI1, CYP4Z1, LIFR, PTEN and DUSP14 signal pathway.

The promoting role of miR-9 in metastasis of osteosarcoma (OS)

OS is the most familiar primary solid bone malignant tumor. It originates from primitive mesenchymal cells, and 90% of OS patients die from lung metastasis.37 MiR-9 expression was demonstrated to be elevated in OS tissue and serum. Additionally, the increased miR-9 level in tissue and serum has a strong correlation with the aggressive phenotype of OS, such as advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, large tumor size and distant metastasis.38, 39, 40 Diao et al41 screened biomarkers by using gene chips from OS patients with or without metastasis, and identified miR-9 and miR-202 as the potential key factors of OS metastasis.

Mechanistically, Fenger et al42 validated that miR-9 motivates the invasion and migration in OS through activating the expression of gelsolin (GSN), an actin filament-severing protein involved in cytoskeletal remodeling. Fang et al43 showed that high dose of 17β-estradiol (E2) treatment up-regulates miR-9, and metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT-1) is reduced by miR-9 post-transcriptionally, and then regulates cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT processes in an ER-independent ways. Moreover, Gang et al44 supported the promoting role of miR-9 on OS cell metastasis and certified that its role is correlated with some other signals including cadherin-1 (CDH1), matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13), FOXO3a, Bcl-2-like protein 11 (BCL2L11), and β-catenin (CTNNB1). Although further experimental studies are needed to confirm these connections, it is still possible to speculate on the important role of miR-9 in OS metastasis.

The promoting role of miR-9 in metastasis of lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer,45 and can be divided into small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The metastasis rate of NSCLC is extremely high, more than half of newly-diagnosed NSCLC patients have metastatic disease and become the most lethal cancer in humans.46 Some recent studies have shown that miR-9 expression is tightly associated with lung cancer metastasis.47,48 The silence of miR-9 by methylation is related with early-stage and pathologically lymph node-negative case of NSCLC, which suggests that miR-9 is involved in NSCLC metastasis.49 For example, Xu et al50 indicated that up-regulation of miR-9 is highly correlated with tumor size and lymph node metastasis, which offers a promising biomarker for poor prognostic in NSCLC patients. Migdalska-Sek et al51 preliminarily explored the effect of miR-9 on the expression of IL-17A, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, in relation to tumor stage and nodule metastasis in NSCLC. In addition, Li et al52 suggested that miR-9 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis of NSCLC via decreasing TGFBR2 expression by directly targeting TGFBR2 3′UTR and sequentially restraining the phosphorylation and activation of the downstream effectors smad2/3.

The promoting roles of miR-9 in metastasis of Prostate cancer and bladder cancer

Prostate cancer is the third commonly diagnosed cancer, accounts for 7.1% of all new cases and caused 3.6 million deaths worldwide.45 MiR-9 is also found to be involved in prostate cancer progression. Seashols-Williams et al53 expounded the effect of miR-9 on prostate cancer, and they analyzed and identified miR-9 as an oncogenic miRNA through high-throughput sequencing and RT-qPCR analysis, and that miR-9 is overexpressed in tumor tissues as compared to adjacent benign glandular epithelium. Mechanistically, E-cadherin and suppressor of cytokine signaling 5 (SOCS5) are targeted and suppressed by miR-9, this is responsible for miR-9-mediated effects on tumor progression and metastasis. In addition, the miR-9/STARD13 axis, which is established by us in breast cancer, is further confirmed in prostate cancer metastasis.54 Furthermore, lncRNA MEG3 can inhibit prostate cancer metastasis through sponging miR-955.

In bladder cancer, Xie et al56 detected the expression of miR-9 and found that miR-9 expression is increased significantly in bladder transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) samples compared to that in normal bladder transitional cell (NBTC) samples, and the overexpression of miR-9 promotes invasion of bladder transitional cells partly via targeting CBX7, which offers a potential target for TCC therapy.

The role of miR-9 in metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC)

CRC is the third most common cancer in the world but second in terms of mortality.45 Interestingly, earlier studies reported that miR-9 plays a promotive role in colon cancer metastasis. Zhu et al57 evaluated miR-9 expression and found a significant increase in CRC specimens with distant metastasis comparing with primary CRC specimens without distant metastasis. The ectopic miR-9 expression may be involved in metastasis by enhancing the motility and targeting α-catenin in CRC cells. Lu et al58 also suggested that Prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1) increases the invasiveness of colon cancer cells through binding to miR-9-2 promoter, triggering its expression to suppress E-cadherin and thus inducing EMT. However, more inhibitory effects of miR-9 on CRC metastasis have been recently reported. For example, Eva et al59 showed that miR-9 expression is down-regulated by methylation in patients with CRC, and also related to the presence of lymph node metastasis. Park et al60 revealed that overexpression of miR-9 suppresses transmembrane-4-L6 family 1 (TM4SF1), and further restrains invasion and metastasis in CRC and miR-9 suppresses MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF expression as well. These results suggest that miR-9 acts as a tumor-suppressor for CRC invasion and metastasis. Additionally, the expression of E-cadherin is confirmed to be up-regulated by miR-9 in CRC cells. Xiong et al61 demonstrated that the ectopic miR-9 expression reduces the level of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) in vitro and in vivo, orderly suppressing CRC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Furthermore, miR-9 overexpression also inhibits Cyclin D1 and Vimentin, whereas it up-regulates the expressions of E-cadherin, and then suppresses cell proliferation and EMT. Chen et al62 provided evidence for the down-regulation of miR-9 by high glucose (HG) concentration in CRC cells, and miR-9 can decrease the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R)/Src signal and downstream cyclin B1 and N-cadherin but upregulate E-cadherin, indicating that miR-9 not only modulates EMT protein expression and morphology but also suppresses the cell migration and invasion ability of CRC. Moreover, miR-9 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells via direct targeting anoctamin-1 (ANO1) as also63(Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The mechanisms underlying the roles of miR-9 in CRC metastasis. The promoting effect of miR-9 on metastasis reported by earlier studies is described on the left, and the inhibitory effect is described on the right.

The suppressive role of miR-9 in metastasis of melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma is increasing worldwide. Although most patients are diagnosed with localized disease and can be treated by surgical removal of the primary tumor, metastasis always happens.64 Shiiyama et al65 illustrated that miR-9 expression is significantly lower in metastatic patients compared to primary patients, showing the significant correlation between miR-9 and melanoma metastasis. Mechanistically, Liu et al66 suggested that miR-9 overexpression decreases Snail1 and increases E-cadherin expression via directly targeting 3′UTR of NF-κB1, then inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis. Consistently, Xue Rong et al66 supported the impact of miR-9 on NF-κB1 and confirmed that the downstream targets of NF-κB1 are regulated by miR-9 in the same pattern, such as MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGFA, thereby suppressing the migration and invasion of uveal melanoma cell. Besides, miR-9 can also regulate melanoma metastasis through other pathways. For example, Zhao et al67 determined that the expression of YY1, a transcription factor, is elevated in melanoma and associated with melanoma metastasis state and tumor stage. YY1 can negatively regulate the transcription of miR-9, which targets RYBP, forming an YY1-miR-9-RYBP axis to promote melanoma growth and progression. Moreover, Dan et al68 indicated that miR-9 overexpression suppresses the growth, migration and invasion of melanoma cells by targeting neuropilin 1 (NRP1) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The mechanisms underlying the roles of miR-9 in melanoma metastasis. MiR-9 is regulated by YY1 and inhibits metastasis via targeting NRP1, NF-κB1 and RYBP signaling pathway.

The suppressive roles of miR-9 in metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), gastric cancer (GC) and brain cancer

NPC is a highly aggressive and metastatic epithelial carcinoma that occurs in the nasopharyngeal mucosa.69 MiR-9 was reported to serve as a biomarker to monitor dynamic change, recurrence and metastasis of NPC. Lu et al70 evaluated the relationship between the low level of plasma miR-9 and worse lymphatic invasion and advanced tumor lymph nodes metastasis stage via plasma microarray profiling between NPC patients and healthy volunteers. In addition, Lu et al71collected patients' blood samples before the treatment initiation, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatments, and at the time of any recurrence or metastasis and they identified miR-9 level is apparently upregulated after treatment, while downregulated again when recurrence or metastasis happens. Furthermore, Lu et al71 provided evidence for miR-9 as a potential metastatic target in NPC treatment. The functional analysis supported that miR-9 could suppress the progression of NPC by targeting CXCR4, which is a key metastatic promoter and associated with the clinicopathological features and prognosis.72,73

GC is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system.45,74 Some studies have shown the tumor-suppressing role of miR-9 in GC development and metastasis. For example, Deng et al75 confirmed that miR-9 downregulates the CUL4A-LATS1-Hippo signaling pathway by directly targeting the 3′UTR of CUL4A and thus suppressing GC cell proliferation, invasion and EMT. In addition, Li duan et al76 demonstrated that miR-9 inhibits the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by suppressing the expression of cyclin D1 and Ets1. These results suggest that miR-9 could be a potential therapeutic target for the future treatment of GC.

Glioblastoma is the most common and invasive primary brain tumor in adults, accounting for 45.6% of primary malignant brain tumors.77 Ben-Hamo et al78 showed that miR-9 overexpression inhibits MAPKAP signaling through a novel regulation mode. MiR-9 initiates re-organization of actin filaments though regulating a subset of genes, MAPK14/MAPKAP3 complex, of the MAPKAP signal and eventually interfering with cell migration and invasion phenotype of glioblastoma cells. This situates hsa-miR-9 as a therapeutic target of metastasis in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

The role of miR-9 in metastasis of liver cancer

Liver cancer contains primary liver cancer and secondary liver cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma accounting for approximately 90% of all primary liver cancers. Hepatocarcinogenesis is a multifactorial process, involving multiple signaling pathways during tumor growth and metastasis.79 Tan HX et al80 confirmed that miR-9 is overexpressed in highly invasive SK-Hep-1 cells than in other hepatoma cell lines, and inhibition of miR-9 could restrain SK-Hep-1 cell invasion, E-cadherin was up-regulated by miR-9 inhibitor as well. These results suggest that miR-9 could be a booster in HCC metastasis. Sun et al81 compared primary and recurrence (intrahepatic metastatic) sites of hepatocellular carcinoma, and found that miR-9 is highly expressed in recurrence sites with a higher invasive and migratory potential and miR-9 may promote migration and invasion via regulating KLF17, which directly acts on the promoter of the EMT-related genes. However, Yi et al82 provided evidence that miR-9 plays an opposite role by inhibiting the α-2, 6-linked sialylation via targeting β-galactoside α-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (St6gal1). This may due to the mechanism of mir-9 in liver cancer metastasis has not been thoroughly studied. There may exist some intermediate molecules that have not been discovered, and there may also be mutual influences between pathways. Therefore, although these articles have initially explored the relationship between miR-9 and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma, it must be noted that the underlying mechanisms by which miR-9 roles in hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis need to be further studied.

The roles of miR-9 in metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 83usually occurs in areas covered by scaly epithelium, such as the skin, mouth, lips, esophagus, cervix, vagina, etc, and 95% of cases can be completely removed the primary tumor. Nevertheless, metastasis of some aggressive squamous cell carcinomas leads to metastasis-related death. White et al84 built a mouse model of SCC through CSCs derived from K15. Kras G12D. Smad4−/− cells and showed that miR-9 is related to CSC expansion and metastasis, and miR-9 could be a potential biomarker for metastatic CSCs. They also found that miR-9 is increased in metastatic human primary SCCs and SCC metastases, and is correlated with a low expression of α-catenin but not E-cadherin. Wu et al38 claimed that miR-9 expression is increased in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Song et al85 demonstrated that miR-9 facilitates the metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) through down-regulating E-cadherin, followed by activation of β-catenin pathway and induction of EMT. Furthermore, the relationship between miR-9 and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was reported by Xue rong et al,86 and they revealed that miR-9 is up-regulated by insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) downregulation and overexpression of miR-9 can promote metastasis via suppressing E-cadherin. These studies support miR-9 acts as a metastasis-promoter in some kinds of SCC. However, it may act a suppressive role in metastasis of other kinds. For example, Sun et al87 confirmed that serum miR-9 was down-regulated in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and low expression is associated with lymph node metastasis, which means that miR-9 might be a tumor suppressor in OSCC.

Discussion and conclusion

Cancer metastasis, causing 90% of human cancer deaths, consists of a string of extremely complex biological processes that tumor cells migrate from the primary carcinoma to a distant secondary site. It is a daunting and significant challenge, as there are no effective therapies for metastatic cancer so far. MiRNAs represent a critical role in the initiation and development of metastatic process. MiR-9 was reported as an important molecule related to the metastasis of many cancers through various signaling pathways that modulate tumor development, and may exist same targets in different cancers (Table 1). Such as E-cadherin, directly targeted or indirectly influenced by miR-9 and regulate metastasis of many cancers including breast cancer, prostate cancer, CRC, melanoma, liver cancer, ESCC and HNSCC, but due to tumor specificity, the effects of miR-9 on E-cadherin and subsequent regulation on metastasis are not exactly identical. Moreover, some other miRNAs may also share the same targets and pathways with miR-9, such as miR-210 can also promotes breast CSC metastasis by targeting E-cadherin,88 and miR-145-5p can hindered the occurrence and metastasis of melanoma cells via inactivating the NF-κB pathway.89 It is worthy of further exploration and research whether these miRNAs and miR-9 are synergistic or competitive in regulating cancer metastasis. And since the feature of multiple genes-targeting and abundant existences in cells, it is not surprising that miRNAs could serve as a new potential target for metastatic therapy and have the potential to be a key factor facilitating the therapeutic strategies.

Table 1.

MiR-9 roles in different cancer metastasis.

Cancer Express Sample Target
Breast cancer high Cell&Tissue E-cadherin, FOXO1, LIFR, STARD13,
PTEN and DUSP14
OS high Serum&Tissue GSN, MALAT-1, CDH1, MMP-13, FOXO3a, BCL2L11, CTNNB1
Lung cancer high Cell&Tissue IL-17A, TGFBR2
Prostate cancer high Tissue E-cadherin, SOCS5
Bladder cancer high Tissue CBX7
CRC low Tissue a-catenin, E-cadherin, TM4SF1, MMP-2/9, VEGF, CXCR4, cylin D1, Vimentin, IGF1R/Src signal, ANO1
Melanoma low Tissue NF-κB1, NRP1, RYBP
NPC low Plasma&Tissue CXCR4
GC low Cell&Tissue CUL4A, cyclin D1 and Ets1
Brain cancer MAPKAP signal
Liver cancer KLF17, St6gal1

–, not identified; OS, osteosarcoma; CRC, colorectal cancer; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; GC, gastric cancer.

Plenty of studies and research have shown the multiple mechanisms of miR-9-mediated regulation of metastasis as evidenced by this overview. For instance, directly targeting tumor promoter or suppressor genes; modulating EMT, cell motility, angiogenesis and CSC-related properties. Moreover, it also functions in the exosomes secreted by tumor cells (Fig. 4). Meanwhile, miR-9 can exert its effects through the ceRNA mechanism, by which mRNAs, lncRNAs, circular RNAs, and RNAs from pseudogenes, competing with each other through the same miRNA recognition sites. Additionally, the function of miR-9 in metastasis is context and tumor type-specific that miR-9 mainly act as a promoter of metastasis capability in breast cancer, OS, prostate cancer and bladder cancer, while it plays the opposite roles in other cancers such as CRC, NPC, melanoma, GC and brain cancer (Table 2). However, the research on the mechanism contributing to miR-9-induced effects on some cancer metastasis is incomplete and needs further exploration.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Multiple mechanisms of miR-9-mediated regulation of cancer metastasis. MiR-9 is regulated by many factors and influence cancer metastasis through multiple mechanisms.

Table 2.

MiR-9 influences metastasis and other properties across cancer types.

Cancer metastasis angiogenesis EMT invasion migration proliferation CSCs motility
Breast cancer
OS
Lung cancer
Prostate cancer
Bladder cancer
CRC
Melanoma
NPC
GC
Brain cancer

↑, promote; ↓, inhibit; OS, osteosarcoma; CRC, colorectal cancer; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; GC, gastric cancer.

Selected miRNAs targeting multiple mRNAs to alter disease status can make these molecules as the candidate therapeutic targets and advances in RNA molecules delivery technology have made miRNA-based treatments more feasible. Based on the initial research of systemic or local injection into the target tissue site, the delivery technology has been improved to chemical modifications of miRNAs, including nanoparticle, and some related drugs have entered the clinical stage at present. For example, MesomiR-1 based on miR-16 mimic is in multi-centre phase I clinical trials currently, which deliver miR-16 and targeting caner disease involving mesothelioma, non-small cell and lung cancer by EnGeneIC Delivery Vehicle (EDV) nanocells coated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific antibodies (NCT02369198). And miR-34 (MRX34), which delivered by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), has been used to target and treat multiple solid tumors in phase I trials such as NSCLC, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer.90 In other diseases, antimiR-122 (RG-101) and antimiR-103 (RG-125), both in clinical trials, act as therapeutic agents in chronic hepatitis C and patients with type 2 diabetes respectively, through N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (GalNAc)-conjugated antimiR delivery system. As an effective factor governing metastasis and a promising target for novel therapeutic approaches, miR-9 has the capacity to develop into drugs. However, due to its extensive and multiplex effects on various cancers, the technical problems of miR-9 in specific targeting in vivo or delivery needs to be further settled.

Author statement

Yichen Liu, Qiong Zhao, Xiaoman Li conceived and designed the study and also managed the collected data. All authors contributed to data collection and wrote the manuscript. Lufeng Zheng fully revised the manuscript, designed, and presented the figures and supported the work along with Xiaoman Li and Tao Xi.

Data availability statement

Research data are not shared unless the corresponding authors agree.

Conflict of Interests

The authors promise no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81903857], the Special Postdoctoral Funding Scheme of China [grant number 2019T120485], the Basic Scientific Research Business Expense Project of China Pharmaceutical University [grant number 2632020ZD10] and the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.

Contributor Information

Lufeng Zheng, Email: zhlf@cpu.edu.cn.

Xiaoman Li, Email: xiaoman1205@163.com.

References

  • 1.Wild C.P. The global cancer burden: necessity is the mother of prevention. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(3):123–124. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jin D., Guo J., Wu Y. m(6)A mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):e135. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0830-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 3.Dong Y., Zheng Q., Wang Z. Higher matrix stiffness as an independent initiator triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition and facilitates HCC metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):e112. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0795-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li Y., Rogoff H.A., Keates S. Suppression of cancer relapse and metastasis by inhibiting cancer stemness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(6):1839–1844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424171112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ketting R.F. A dead end for microRNAs. Cell. 2007;131(7):1226–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pradhan A.K., Bhoopathi P., Talukdar S. MDA-7/IL-24 Regulates the miRNA processing enzyme DICER through downregulation of MITF. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(12):5687–5692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819869116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedman R.C., Farh K.K., Burge C.B., Bartel D.P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19(1):92–105. doi: 10.1101/gr.082701.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Filipowicz W., Bhattacharyya S.N., Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(2):102–114. doi: 10.1038/nrg2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khafaei M., Rezaie E., Mohammadi A. miR-9: from function to therapeutic potential in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019 doi: 10.1002/jcp.28210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J., Jia J., Zhao L. Down-regulation of microRNA-9 leads to activation of IL-6/Jak/STAT3 pathway through directly targeting IL-6 in HeLa cell. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55(5):732–742. doi: 10.1002/mc.22317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nowek K., Wiemer E.A.C., Jongen-Lavrencic M. The versatile nature of miR-9/9∗ in human cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(29):20838–20854. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ma L., Teruya-Feldstein J., Weinberg R.A. Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer. Nature. 2007;449(7163):682–688. doi: 10.1038/nature06174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ma L. MicroRNA and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;132:165–207. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma L., Weinberg R.A. Micromanagers of malignancy: role of microRNAs in regulating metastasis. Trends Genet. 2008;24(9):448–456. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen X., Zhao M., Huang J. MicroRNA-130a suppresses breast cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting FOSL1 and upregulating ZO-1. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(6):4945–4956. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lohcharoenkal W., Das Mahapatra K., Pasquali L. Genome-wide screen for MicroRNAs reveals a role for miR-203 in melanoma metastasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(4):882–892. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alshamrani A.A. Roles of microRNAs in ovarian cancer tumorigenesis: two decades later, What Have We Learned? Front Oncol. 2020;10:e1084. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma L., Young J., Prabhala H. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(3):247–256. doi: 10.1038/ncb2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li X., Zheng L., Zhang F. STARD13-correlated ceRNA network inhibits EMT and metastasis of breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):23197–23211. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang B., Zheng L., Chou J. CYP4Z1 3'UTR represses migration of human breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478(2):900–907. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang J., Li T., Gao C. FOXO1 3'UTR functions as a ceRNA in repressing the metastases of breast cancer cells via regulating miRNA activity. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(17):3218–3224. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu M., Cao M., He Y. A novel role of low molecular weight hyaluronan in breast cancer metastasis. FASEB J. 2015;29(4):1290–1298. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-259978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J., Zhao H., Tang D., Wu J., Yao G., Zhang Q. Overexpressions of microRNA-9 and microRNA-200c in human breast cancers are associated with lymph node metastasis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013;28(4):283–288. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jang M.H., Kim H.J., Gwak J.M., Chung Y.R., Park S.Y. Prognostic value of microRNA-9 and microRNA-155 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2017;68:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shi Y., Ye P., Long X. Differential expression profiles of the transcriptome in breast cancer cell lines revealed by next generation sequencing. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44(2):804–816. doi: 10.1159/000485344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gravgaard K.H., Lyng M.B., Laenkholm A.V. The miRNA-200 family and miRNA-9 exhibit differential expression in primary versus corresponding metastatic tissue in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(1):207–217. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1969-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liao D.J., Dickson R.B. c-Myc in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2000;7(3):143–164. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0070143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun Y., Wu J., Wu S.H. Expression profile of microRNAs in c-Myc induced mouse mammary tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(1):185–196. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0171-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tharmapalan P., Mahendralingam M., Berman H.K., Khokha R. Mammary stem cells and progenitors: targeting the roots of breast cancer for prevention. EMBO J. 2019;38(14) doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang H., Cai K., Wang J. MiR-7, inhibited indirectly by lincRNA HOTAIR, directly inhibits SETDB1 and reverses the EMT of breast cancer stem cells by downregulating the STAT3 pathway. Stem Cell. 2014;32(11):2858–2868. doi: 10.1002/stem.1795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheng C.W., Yu J.C., Hsieh Y.H. Increased cellular levels of MicroRNA-9 and MicroRNA-221 correlate with cancer stemness and predict poor outcome in human breast cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(5):2205–2218. doi: 10.1159/000492561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qi X., Zhang D.H., Wu N., Xiao J.H., Wang X., Ma W. ceRNA in cancer: possible functions and clinical implications. J Med Genet. 2015;52(10):710–718. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen D., Sun Y., Wei Y. LIFR is a breast cancer metastasis suppressor upstream of the Hippo-YAP pathway and a prognostic marker. Nat Med. 2012;18(10):1511–1517. doi: 10.1038/nm.2940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.D'Ippolito E., Plantamura I., Bongiovanni L. miR-9 and miR-200 regulate PDGFRbeta-mediated endothelial differentiation of tumor cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(18):5562–5572. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yu X., Odenthal M., Fries J.W. Exosomes as miRNA carriers: formation-function-future. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):e2028. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kia V., Paryan M., Mortazavi Y., Biglari A., Mohammadi-Yeganeh S. Evaluation of exosomal miR-9 and miR-155 targeting PTEN and DUSP14 in highly metastatic breast cancer and their effect on low metastatic cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(4):5666–5676. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ritter J., Bielack S.S. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii320–vii325. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu S., Jia S., Xu P. MicroRNA-9 as a novel prognostic biomarker in human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(12):5523–5528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fei D., Li Y., Zhao D., Zhao K., Dai L., Gao Z. Serum miR-9 as a prognostic biomarker in patients with osteosarcoma. J Int Med Res. 2014;42(4):932–937. doi: 10.1177/0300060514534643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hu H., Zhang Y., Cai X.H., Huang J.F., Cai L. Changes in microRNA expression in the MG-63 osteosarcoma cell line compared with osteoblasts. Oncol Lett. 2012;4(5):1037–1042. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Diao C.Y., Guo H.B., Ouyang Y.R. Screening for metastatic osteosarcoma biomarkers with a DNA microarray. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(4):1817–1822. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fenger J.M., Roberts R.D., Iwenofu O.H. MiR-9 is overexpressed in spontaneous canine osteosarcoma and promotes a metastatic phenotype including invasion and migration in osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):e784. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2837-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fang D., Yang H., Lin J. 17beta-estradiol regulates cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion and promotes apoptosis by upregulating miR-9 and thus degrades MALAT-1 in osteosarcoma cell MG-63 in an estrogen receptor-independent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;457(4):500–506. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gang W., Tanjun W., Yong H., Jiajun Q., Yi Z., Hao H. Inhibition of miR-9 decreases osteosarcoma cell proliferation. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2020;20(2):218–225. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fang C., Wang L., Gong C., Wu W., Yao C., Zhu S. Long non-coding RNAs: how to regulate the metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(6):3282–3291. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang R., Chen X.F., Shu Y.Q. Prediction of non-small cell lung cancer metastasis-associated microRNAs using bioinformatics. Am J Cancer Res. 2014;5(1):32–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rask L., Fregil M., Høgdall E., Mitchelmore C., Eriksen J. Development of a metastatic fluorescent Lewis Lung carcinoma mouse model: identification of mRNAs and microRNAs involved in tumor invasion. Gene. 2013;517(1):72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Muraoka T., Soh J., Toyooka S. Impact of aberrant methylation of microRNA-9 family members on non-small cell lung cancers. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1(1):185–189. doi: 10.3892/mco.2012.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xu T., Liu X., Han L., Shen H., Liu L., Shu Y. Up-regulation of miR-9 expression as a poor prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014;16(5):469–475. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1106-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Migdalska-Sek M., Góralska K., Jabłoński S. Evaluation of the relationship between the IL-17A gene expression level and regulatory miRNA-9 in relation to tumor progression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(1):583–592. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-05164-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li G., Wu F., Yang H., Deng X., Yuan Y. MiR-9-5p promotes cell growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer through the repression of TGFBR2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:1170–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Seashols-Williams S.J., Budd W., Clark G.C. miR-9 acts as an OncomiR in prostate cancer through multiple pathways that drive tumour progression and metastasis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen L., Hu W., Li G., Guo Y., Wan Z., Yu J. Inhibition of miR-9-5p suppresses prostate cancer progress by targeting StarD13. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2019;24:e20. doi: 10.1186/s11658-019-0145-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wu M., Huang Y., Chen T. LncRNA MEG3 inhibits the progression of prostate cancer by modulating miR-9-5p/QKI-5 axis. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(1):29–38. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xie D., Shang C., Zhang H., Guo Y., Tong X. Up-regulation of miR-9 target CBX7 to regulate invasion ability of bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:225–230. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhu L., Chen H., Zhou D. MicroRNA-9 up-regulation is involved in colorectal cancer metastasis via promoting cell motility. Med Oncol. 2012;29(2):1037–1043. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9975-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lu M.H., Huang C.C., Pan M.R., Chen H.H., Hung W.C. Prospero homeobox 1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells by inhibiting E-cadherin via miR-9. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(23):6416–6425. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bandres E., Agirre X., Bitarte N. Epigenetic regulation of microRNA expression in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(11):2737–2743. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Park Y.R., Lee S.T., Kim S.L. MicroRNA-9 suppresses cell migration and invasion through downregulation of TM4SF1 in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2016;48(5):2135–2143. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xiong W.C., Han N., Ping G.F. microRNA-9 functions as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer by targeting CXCR4. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(2):526–536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen Y.C., Ou M.C., Fang C.W., Lee T.H., Tzeng S.L. High glucose concentrations negatively regulate the IGF1R/Src/ERK Axis through the MicroRNA-9 in colorectal cancer. Cells. 2019;8(4):e326. doi: 10.3390/cells8040326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Park Y.R., Lee S.T., Kim S.L. Down-regulation of miR-9 promotes epithelial mesenchymal transition via regulating anoctamin-1 (ANO1) in CRC cells. Cancer Genet. 2019;231–232:22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rastrelli M., Tropea S., Rossi C.R., Alaibac M. Melanoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification. In Vivo. 2014;28(6):1005–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Shiiyama R., Fukushima S., Jinnin M. Sensitive detection of melanoma metastasis using circulating microRNA expression profiles. Melanoma Res. 2013;23(5):366–372. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e328363e485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu N., Sun Q., Chen J. MicroRNA-9 suppresses uveal melanoma cell migration and invasion through the NF-kappaB1 pathway. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(3):961–968. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhao G., Li Q., Wang A., Jiao J. YY1 regulates melanoma tumorigenesis through a miR-9 ~ RYBP axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34(1):e66. doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0177-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xu D., Chen X., He Q., Luo C. MicroRNA-9 suppresses the growth, migration, and invasion of malignant melanoma cells via targeting NRP1. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:7047–7057. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S107235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chen Y.P., Chan A.T.C., Le Q.T., Blanchard P., Sun Y., Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):64–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lu J., Xu X., Liu X. Predictive value of miR-9 as a potential biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(2):392–398. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lu J., Luo H., Liu X. miR-9 targets CXCR4 and functions as a potential tumor suppressor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(3):554–563. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Qiao N., Wang L., Wang T., Li H. Inflammatory CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis mediates G-protein signaling pathway to influence the invasion and migration of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(6):8169–8179. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4686-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Li Y.L., Li Y.F., Li H.F., Lv H.Q., Sun D.Z. Role of SDF-1alpha/CXCR4 signaling pathway in clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Biosci Rep. 2017;37(4) doi: 10.1042/BSR20170144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 74.Song Z., Wu Y., Yang J., Yang D., Fang X. Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(7) doi: 10.1177/1010428317714626. e1010428317714626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Deng J., Lei W., Xiang X. Cullin 4A (CUL4A), a direct target of miR-9 and miR-137, promotes gastric cancer proliferation and invasion by regulating the Hippo signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7(9):10037–10050. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zheng L., Qi T., Yang D. microRNA-9 suppresses the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells through targeting cyclin D1 and Ets1. PLoS One. 2013;8(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mattiuzzi C., Lippi G. Cancer statistics: a comparison between world health organization (WHO) and global burden of disease (GBD) Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(5):1026–1027. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ben-Hamo R., Zilberberg A., Cohen H., Efroni S. hsa-miR-9 controls the mobility behavior of glioblastoma cells via regulation of MAPK14 signaling elements. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):23170–23181. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Waghray A., Murali A.R., Menon K.N. Hepatocellular carcinoma: from diagnosis to treatment. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(8):1020–1029. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i8.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tan H.X., Wang Q., Chen L.Z. MicroRNA-9 reduces cell invasion and E-cadherin secretion in SK-Hep-1 cell. Med Oncol. 2010;27(3):654–660. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9264-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sun Z., Han Q., Zhou N. MicroRNA-9 enhances migration and invasion through KLF17 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2013;7(5):884–894. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Han Y., Liu Y., Fu X. miR-9 inhibits the metastatic ability of hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting beta galactoside alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1. J Physiol Biochem. 2018;74(3):491–501. doi: 10.1007/s13105-018-0642-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kallini J.R., Hamed N., Khachemoune A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: epidemiology, classification, management, and novel trends. Int J Dermatol. 2015;54(2):130–140. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.White R.A., Neiman J.M., Reddi A. Epithelial stem cell mutations that promote squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4390–4404. doi: 10.1172/JCI65856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Song Y., Li J., Zhu Y. MicroRNA-9 promotes tumor metastasis via repressing E-cadherin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5(22):11669–11680. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Luo X., Fan S., Huang W. Downregulation of IRS-1 promotes metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(2):659–667. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sun L., Liu L., Fu H., Wang Q., Shi Y. Association of decreased expression of serum miR-9 with poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:289–294. doi: 10.12659/MSM.895683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tang T., Yang Z., Zhu Q., Wu Y. Up-regulation of miR-210 induced by a hypoxic microenvironment promotes breast cancer stem cells metastasis, proliferation, and self-renewal by targeting E-cadherin. FASEB J. 2018 doi: 10.1096/fj.201801013R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Jin C., Wang A., Liu L., Wang G., Li G., Han Z. miR-145-5p inhibits tumor occurrence and metastasis through the NF-κB signaling pathway by targeting TLR4 in malignant melanoma. J Cell Biochem. 2019 doi: 10.1002/jcb.28388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rupaimoole R., Slack F.J. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(3):203–222. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Research data are not shared unless the corresponding authors agree.


Articles from Genes & Diseases are provided here courtesy of Chongqing Medical University

RESOURCES