Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2021 Sep 9;21:1009. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08741-4

Incidence and survival analyses for occult lung cancer between 2004 and 2015: a population-based study

Lei-Lei Wu 1,#, Chong-Wu Li 1,#, Wei-Kang Lin 1, Li-Hong Qiu 2, Dong Xie 1,
PMCID: PMC8427887  PMID: 34496775

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and long-term survival outcomes of occult lung cancer between 2004 and 2015.

Methods

A total of 2958 patients were diagnosed with occult lung cancer in the 305,054 patients with lung cancer. The entire cohort was used to calculate the crude incidence rate. Eligible 52,472 patients (T1-xN0M0, including 2353 occult lung cancers) were selected from the entire cohort to perform survival analyses after translating T classification according to the 8th TNM staging system. Cancer-specific survival curves for different T classifications were presented.

Results

The crude incidence rate of occult lung cancer was 1.00 per 100 patients, and it was reduced between 2004 and 2015 [1.4 per 100 persons in 2004; 0.6 per 100 persons in 2015; adjusted risk ratio = 0.437, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.363–0.527]. In the survival analysis, there were 2206 death events in the 2353 occult lung cancers. The results of the multivariable analysis revealed that the prognoses with occult lung cancer were similar to patients with stage T3N0M0 (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.054, 95% CI 0.986–1.127, p = 0.121). Adjusted survival curves presented the same results. In addition, adjusted for other confounders, female, age ≤ 72 years, surgical treatment, radiotherapy, adenocarcinoma, and non-squamous and non-adenocarcinoma non-small cell carcinoma were independent protective prognostic factors (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Occult lung cancer was uncommon. However, the cancer-specific survival of occult lung cancer was poor, therefore, we should put the assessment of its prognoses on the agenda. Timely surgical treatment and radiotherapy could improve survival outcomes for those patients. Besides, we still need more research to confirm those findings.

Keywords: Occult lung cancer, Incidence, Survival, Surveillance, Epidemiology, And end results database

Background

Lung cancer still is the leading malignancy in the global cancer spectrum of morbidity and mortality [1]. Lung cancer mainly comprises non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with more than 83% of all cases being NSCLC [2]. Because of late diagnosis and tumor recurrence, the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with NSCLC and SCLC remains low (approximately 23 and 6%, respectively) [2, 3]. Tumor proven by the presence of malignant cells in sputum or bronchial washings but not visualized by imaging or bronchoscopy is considered as occult lung cancer [4, 5]. Previous studies on the incidence of occult lung cancer have only analyzed groups of stroke patients, or incidental case reports of other diseases [69]. Therefore, for lung cancer patients, the incidence information of occult lung cancer remains insufficient.

In addition, accurate tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging means that the prognosis of the patients is accurate [10, 11]. Patients with stage IA (classification T1N0M0) have the best long-term survival outcomes in all lung cancers [10]. In the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, occult lung cancers are classified as TxN0M0 [12]. Thus, the prognosis of occult lung cancer patients remains unclear because of the unclear TNM classification. The prognoses of diseases have an effect on treatment selection and patients’ management. However, there was no data about the incidence rate and survival analyses of occult lung cancer in the previous studies. Thus, we aimed to investigate the incidence rate and prognostic level of those patients with occult lung cancer.

Methods

Patients

The Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital approved this study and considered this study exempt from ethical review because existing data without patient identifiers were used. This study majorly included two parts, incidence-rate analysis (step 1) and survival analysis (step 2). We retrospectively recruited patients who were histologically diagnosed with malignant tumor in the lungs as their first primary malignancy from 2004 to 2015 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which contains clinicopathological and survival data of cancer patients from 18 registries. Therefore, the present study could be considered as a multi-center analysis. The selection criteria of patients were shown in Fig. 1. A total of 305,054 patients (including 2958 occult lung cancers) were used to perform incidence analysis after step-one case selection. Next, we processed step-two case selection. There were 52,472 eligible patients (including 2353 occult lung cancers) for survival analysis. The detailed information was presented as Fig. 1. All patient records were anonymized before analysis. Information collected from the SEER database included sex, race/ ethnicity, survival time, cause on disease, age at diagnosis, tumor size, approach of treatment (including surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), tumor differentiation, histological subtype, tumor location, TNM stage, and marital status.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The flow chart of this study

Follow-up

Cancer-specific survival, which was the duration from the date of diagnosis to death caused by lung cancer, was regarded as our observational endpoint. For survival analysis, follow-up duration ranged from 1.0 to 155.0 months, with a median of 27.0 months. Those patients who entered the survival analysis had definitive survival status, death or alive.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistics 25.0 software (IBM SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and GraphPad Prism 8 (https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/). Risk ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multivariable Logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis, respectively (regression method was Enter selection). The average value of each covariate was calculated by the multivariable Cox regression model, and estimated the adjusted survival curves of T classification. Statistical tests were considered statistically significant with two-sided p value < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

In the step-one case selection, there were 305,054 patients (including 2958 occult lung cancers) for calculating incidence. Majority of the patients were male (N = 162,448, 53.3%), and 248,125 (81.3%) were non-Hispanic whites. The median age was 68 years old (range from 18 years to 104 years). The detailed information of patient characteristics was shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristic of lung cancer patients from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database

All patients
(N = 305,054)
Variables N %
Sex
 Male 162,448 53.3
 Female 142,606 46.7
Race
 Non-Hispanic whites 248,125 81.3
 Non-Hispanic others 56,929 18.7
Age (year)
  ≤ 68 159,281 52.2
  > 68 145,773 47.8
 Median (range) 68 (18–104)
z Grade
 Well 16,073 5.3
 Moderate 52,350 17.2
 Poor 85,221 27.9
 Undifferentiated 14,184 4.6
 Unknown 13,7226 45.0
Tumor Location
 Main bronchus 15,819 5.2
 Upper lobe 155,796 51.1
 Middle lobe 13,314 4.4
 Lower lobe 77,101 25.3
 Overlapping lesion of lung 3973 1.2
 Unknown 39,051 12.8
Radiotherapy
 No 174,025 57.0
 Yes 128,452 42.2
 Unknown 2577 0.8
Chemotherapy
 No 159,187 52.2
 Yes 145,867 47.8
Marital status
 Married 156,432 51.3
 Non-married 136,241 44.6
 Unknown 12,381 4.1
Surgical treatment
 None 233,739 76.5
 Limited resection 14,070 4.6
 Lobectomy 51,453 16.8
 Pneumonectomy 4030 1.4
 Unknown surgical approach 729 0.2
 Unknown 1543 0.5
Year at diagnosis
 2004 23,625 7.7
 2005 22,774 7.6
 2006 24,250 7.9
 2007 25,094 8.2
 2008 25,384 8.3
 2009 25,936 8.5
 2010 25,606 8.4
 2011 25,631 8.4
 2012 26,120 8.6
 2013 26,344 8.6
 2014 26,874 8.8
 2015 27,416 9.0
Occult lung cancer
 Yes 2958 1.0
 No 302,096 99.0

After step-two case selection, eligible 52,472 patients (including 2353 occult lung cancers) entered into processing of survival analysis. Male patients accounted for 51.2% (N = 26,858). Age at diagnosis ranged from 18 years old to 100 years old (median 70 years). The major part of histological subtypes belonged to adenocarcinoma (N = 23,406, 44.6%) as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristic of lung cancer patients for survival analysis

All patients
(N = 52,472)
Variables N %
Sex
 Male 26,858 51.2
 Female 25,614 48.8
Race
 Non-Hispanic whites 43,818 83.5
 Non-Hispanic others 8654 16.5
Age (year)
  ≤ 68 23,070 44.0
  > 68 29,402 56.0
 Median (range) 70 (18–100)
Grade
 Well 5579 10.6
 Moderate 16,142 30.8
 Poor 16,855 32.1
 Undifferentiated 1745 3.3
 Unknown 12,151 23.2
Tumor Location
 Main bronchus 1271 2.4
 Upper lobe 30,463 58.0
 Middle lobe 2423 4.6
 Lower lobe 15,734 30.0
 Overlapping lesion of lung 607 1.2
 Unknown 1974 3.8
Radiotherapy
 No 37,612 71.7
 Yes 14,508 27.6
 Unknown 352 0.7
Chemotherapy
 No 39,127 74.6
 Yes 13,345 25.4
Marital status
 Married 27,089 51.6
 Non-married 23,504 44.8
 Unknown 1879 3.6
Surgical treatment
 None 22,136 42.2
 Limited resection 5784 11.0
 Lobectomy 23,228 44.2
 Pneumonectomy 984 1.9
 Unknown surgical approach 29 0.1
 Unknown 311 0.6
Histological subtypes
 Squamous cell carcinoma 16,691 31.8
 Adenocarcinoma 23,406 44.6
 Non-squamous and non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC 5128 9.8
 Small-cell carcinoma 2583 4.9
 Unknown non-sarcoma carcinoma 477 0.9
 Unknown NSCLC 4187 8.0
T classification
 T1a 1752 3.3
 T1b 9439 18.0
 T1c 8412 16.1
 T2a 11,509 21.9
 T2b 3784 7.2
 T3 4180 8.0
 T4 11,043 21.0
 Tx (occult) 2353 4.5

NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer

Incidence-rate analysis

In the all 305,054 patients, the crude incidence rate was 1.00 per 100 patients, and it was reduced between 2004 and 2015 [Fig. 2, 1.4 (95% CI 1.22–1.52) per 100 persons in 2004; 0.6 (95% CI 0.53–0.72) per 100 persons in 2015; Table 3, adjusted RR = 0.437, 95% CI 0.363–0.527]. The results of Linear regression revealed that trends about crude incidence rate of occult lung cancer was decreased over time (R = ˗0.023, p < 0.001).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The crude incidence rate of occult lung cancer over time in the 305,054 lung cancer patients

Table 3.

The results of multivariable Logistic regression analyses

Multivariable analysis
RR 95% CI P-Value
Year at diagnosis
 2004 1 reference
 2005 0.927 0.790–1.087 0.349
 2006 0.828 0.705–0.974 0.022
 2007 0.828 0.706–0.972 0.021
 2008 0.792 0.674–0.930 0.005
 2009 0.696 0.589–0.821 < 0.001
 2010 0.685 0.580–0.809 < 0.001
 2011 0.643 0.543–0.762 < 0.001
 2012 0.549 0.460–0.655 < 0.001
 2013 0.578 0.486–0.687 < 0.001
 2014 0.479 0.399–0.575 < 0.001
 2015 0.437 0.363–0.527 < 0.001
Sex
 Male 1 reference
 Female 0.988 0.919–1.063 0.752
 Age (continuous) 1.035 1.031–1.038 < 0.001
Race
 Non-Hispanic whites 1 reference
 Non-Hispanic others 0.925 0.842–1.016 0.102

RR risk ratio, CI confidence interval

Logistic regression’s method was Enter selection

The results of multivariable analysis were adjusted for other confounding factors, such as sex, age, and race/ ethnicity

Survival analysis of T classification

The median survival time of all 52,472 patients was 27 months (range from 1 month to 155 months). Besides, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of this cohort were 62, 49, and 44%, respectively. The unadjusted 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was the best in the patients with T1a (75%) and the worst in the patients with Tx (15%). The median survival time was 13 months (95% CI 12.10–13.90 months) in the patients with Tx, which indicated the rate of death events had exceeded 50%. We also found that the classification of Tx was the riskiest factor for the prognoses (Table 4, unadjusted HR =6.339, p < 0.001). However, the results were not inconsistent after multivariable Cox regression analysis. We used multivariable Cox regression analysis to identify the prognostic role of Tx (occult lung cancer) in the different T classifications (Table 4). After adjusting for other confounders, patients with Tx had a poorer prognosis than patients of T2b (adjusted HR 1.186, p < 0.001), nevertheless better long-term survival outcomes than patients with T4 (adjusted HR 0.845, p < 0.001). Besides, the prognosis for patients of Tx was not statistically different from that of T3 patients (p = 0.121). The adjusted survival curves also presented similar results (Fig. 3).

Table 4.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses for prognostic factors

N 5-year CSS Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR P-Value HR 95% CI P-Value
T classification < 0.001 < 0.001
T1a 1752 75% 1 1 reference
T1b 9439 67% 1.230 < 0.001 1.113 1.010–1.227 0.030
T1c 8412 56% 1.788 < 0.001 1.379 1.252–1.519 < 0.001
T2a 11,509 47% 2.345 < 0.001 1.889 1.719–2.076 < 0.001
T2b 3784 37% 3.079 < 0.001 2.172 1.964–2.402 < 0.001
T3 4180 31% 3.759 < 0.001 2.510 2.273–2.772 < 0.001
T4 11,043 19% 5.555 < 0.001 3.178 2.892–3.493 < 0.001
Tx (occult) 2353 15% 6.344 < 0.001 2.624 2.365–2.910 < 0.001
Subgroup comparison
 Tx vs. T2b 2.020 < 0.001 1.186 1.104–1.273 < 0.001
 Tx vs. T3 1.648 < 0.001 1.054 0.986–1.127 0.121
 Tx vs. T4 1.127 < 0.001 0.845 0.801–0.891 < 0.001

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Cox regression’s method was Enter selection

The results of multivariable analysis were adjusted for other confounding factors, such as sex, age, tumor differentiation, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgical treatment, histological subtypes, marital status, tumor location and race/ ethnicity

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The adjusted survival curves of different T classifications

Prognostic analysis for occult lung cancer

There were 2353 occult lung cancer patients for survival analyses, of which baseline characteristics were shown in Table 5. In this cohort, there were 2206 death events in the 2353 occult lung cancers. Female patients showed a better survival than male patients (Table 6, adjusted HR = 0.796, 95%CI 0.726–0.876, p < 0.001). Besides, the prognosis in patients with age > 72 years was poorer than younger patients (adjusted HR = 1.183, 95%CI 1.063–1.295). The number of adenocarcinomas was the most, which accounted for 33.0% (N = 776). Its long-term survival outcomes were better than squamous cell carcinomas (adjusted HR = 0.878, p = 0.042). Of note, 1162 patients didn’t receive any treatment. However, patients who underwent surgical resection or radiotherapy had improved survival benefits (Table 6). One-hundred and twenty-six patients underwent lobectomy, whose 5-year cancer-specific survival rate reached 47%. After adjusting for other confounders, we identified sex, tumor differentiation, tumor location, age, histological subtypes, radiotherapy, and surgical treatment as independent prognostic factors.

Table 5.

Baseline characteristics in the cohort with occult lung cancer

Variables All patients
(N = 2353)
Percentage (%)
Sex
 Male 1235 52.5
 Female 1118 47.5
Tumor differentiation
 Well 186 7.9
 Moderate 409 17.4
 Poor 686 29.1
 Unknown 1072 45.6
Tumor location
 Upper lobe 1096 46.6
 Middle lobe 105 4.5
 Lower lobe 668 28.4
 Other location 105 4.5
 Unknown 379 16.0
Age (year)
  ≤ 72 1210 51.4
  > 72 1143 48.6
 Median (range) 72 (19–99)
Histological subtypes
 Squamous cell carcinoma 726 30.9
 Adenocarcinoma 776 33.0
 Non-squamous and non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC 165 7.0
 Small-cell carcinoma 300 12.7
 Unknown non-sarcoma carcinoma 55 2.3
 Unknown NSCLC 331 14.1
Chemotherapy
 No 1677 71.3
 Yes 676 28.7
Radiotherapy
 No 1703 72.4
 Yes 623 26.5
 Unknown 27 1.1
Marital status
 Married 1092 46.4
 Non-married 1116 47.4
 Unknown 145 6.2
Race/ ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic whites 1928 81.9
 Non-Hispanic other 425 18.1
Surgical treatment
 None 2077 88.3
 Limited resection 77 3.3
 Lobectomy 126 5.4
 Pneumonectomy 7 0.3
 Unknown surgical approach 4 0.2
 Unknown 62 2.5

NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer

Table 6.

Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for prognostic factors in 2353 occult lung cancer patients

Variables 5-year CSS Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR P-Value HR 95% CI P-Value
Sex
 Male 14% 1 1 reference
 Female 16% 0.830 < 0.001 0.796 0.723–0.876 < 0.001
Tumor differentiation
 Well 18% 1 1 reference
 Moderate 17% 1.062 0.564 0.654 0.769–1.179 0.654
 Poor 13% 1.373 0.001 1.214 1.003–1.506 0.046
 Unknown 15% 1.152 0.131 1.038 0.860–1.264 0.669
Tumor location
 Upper lobe 17% 1 1 reference
 Middle lobe 9% 1.090 0.447 1.141 0.913–1.427 0.246
 Lower lobe 14% 1.110 0.067 1.124 1.004–1.259 0.042
 Other location 18% 1.115 0.354 1.036 0.822–1.305 0.767
 Unknown 11% 1.291 < 0.001 1.241 1.084–1.421 0.002
Age (median, year)
  ≤ 72 16% 1 1 reference
  > 72 14% 1.237 < 0.001 1.183 1.072–1.305 0.001
Histological subtypes
 Squamous cell carcinoma 13% 1 1 reference
 Adenocarcinoma 14% 0.890 0.05 0.878 0.775–0.995 0.042
 Non-squamous and non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC 24% 0.680 < 0.001 0.754 0.609–0.933 0.010
 Small-cell carcinoma 12% 0.992 0.920 0.958 0.812–1.131 0.616
 Unknown non-sarcoma carcinoma 31% 0.647 0.022 0.558 0.380–0.820 0.003
 Unknown NSCLC 15% 0.952 0.518 0.923 0.790–1.079 0.317
Chemotherapy
 No 17% 1 1 reference
 Yes 10% 0.926 0.132 0.946 0.846–1.059 0.338
Radiotherapy
 No 15% 1 1 reference
 Yes 16% 0.795 < 0.001 0.716 0.638–0.802 < 0.001
 Unknown 12% 1.077 0.730 1.020 0.666–1.562 0.928
Marital status
 Non-married 14% 1
 Married 15% 0.990 0.837
 Unknown 17% 1.045 0.662
Race/ ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic whites 15% 1 1 reference
 Non-Hispanic other 16% 0.995 0.938 1.063 0.941–1.202 0.323
Surgical treatment
 None 12% 1 1 reference
 Limited resection 30% 0.462 < 0.001 0.476 0.354–0.640 < 0.001
 Lobectomy 47% 0.285 < 0.001 0.269 0.269–0.352 < 0.001
 Pneumonectomy 13% 0.476 0.098 0.427 0.176–1.032 0.059
 Unknown surgical approach NA 0.506 0.238 0.544 0.175–1.695 0.294
 Unknown 16% 0.972 0.847 0.899 0.673–1.203 0.475

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, NSCLC non-small cell lung carcinoma

Cox regression’s method was Enter selection

Discussion

In the present study, we used the data of 305,054 patients (including 2958occult lung cancer patients) to perform incidence-rate analysis. The results revealed that the crude incidence rate of occult lung cancer was 1.00 per 100 patients, and the incidence-rate trend over time was likely to be reduced between 2004 and 2015. Next, data on 52,472 eligible patients were analyzed by Cox regression analysis including univariable and multivariable analyses. Those patients included 2353 cases of occult lung cancer. According to the results, we found that occult lung cancer patients didn’t have satisfactory survival outcomes. The prognosis of occult lung cancer was between T2b’s and T4’s. Besides, there was no significant difference in the prognosis of patients with T3 classification or occult lung cancer. After adjusting for other confounders, the female, age ≤ 72, well differentiation, adenocarcinoma, radiotherapy, and surgical resection were considered as independent protective prognostic factors for 2353 occult lung cancer patients. Therefore, we suggested that surgery might be an appropriate option for occult lung cancer.

The incidence rate of occult lung cancer varied to a certain extent in the different populations. Previous studies and case reports found that occult lung cancer was usually accompanied by symptoms, metastatic diseases or other internal-medicine diseases when it was detected [6, 1316]. Yoel Siegel et al. described a case report that occult lung cancer could mimic pneumonia and a pulmonary embolus by occluding a pulmonary vein [7]. A case by William Carrera et al. presented that occult small cell lung cancer might have a relation with occurring of retinopathy with chorioretinitis and optic neuritis [8]. Besides, Hui Mai et al. performed a study about characteristics of occult lung cancer-associated ischemic stroke, and suggested that occult cancer should be considered in the setting of multiple and recurrent embolic strokes within the short term in the absence of conventional stroke etiologies [9]. The above cases and study showed that occult lung cancer might be accompanied by different clinical symptoms. However, clinicians tend to pay more attention to their specialties, thus the diagnosis of the occult lung cancer becomes more complicated. Therefore, the research on the incidence rate of this disease may provide clinicians with some references for disease diagnosis and treatment.

Because malignant tumors may cause the blood to hypercoagulable state, which leads to the occurrence of thrombosis [17], the previous researchers began to investigate the incidence of occult lung cancer in stroke patients. Alejandro Daniel Babore et al. analyzed data of over 800,000 patients, and uncovered that the prevalence of occult lung cancer was 5.3 per 1000 patients in the stroke patients, and 2.6 per 1000 patients in the control group [6]. The sample size of their study was large, therefore, the results had clinical reference value. However, the results of the present study revealed that crude incidence rate of occult lung cancer was 10.0 per 1000 patients, which was much higher than the findings from above study. This difference in the incidence-rate results between above two studies was likely to be due to different selected cohorts. Our study cohort focused on lung cancer, which led to a higher incidence rate of occult lung cancer in the present study. However, the study by Alejandro Daniel Babore et al. majorly compared the incidence rate of occult lung cancer in stoke patients with that in general patients. Besides, they tried to explore the factors which might have effect on incidence rate. Though, this present study paid more attention to the incidence rate of occult lung cancer in entire lung cancer cohort, and illustrated that the incidence rate over time was reduced between 2004 and 2015. The reason why general trend over time was declined might be the popularization of computed tomography screening and the promotion of bronchoscopy [4, 18, 19].

The present study found that the prognosis of occult lung cancer patients was poorer than that in patients with T2 disease. Those patients might have occult metastasis of lymph node or another organ, which leads to a poor prognosis. Of note, timely therapy could improve the long-term survival in the occult lung cancer. Patients who underwent surgical resection had better cancer-specific survival than patients who didn’t receive surgical treatment. And, the best survival benefit was derived from lobectomy. Joel J. Bechtel et al. and Cortese DA et al. had similar findings in their research [20, 21]. They suggested that 5-year survival rate was 74 and 90% in patients with cure resection, respectively. However, the sample size was relatively small in their research [20, 21]. For example, in the study by Joel J. Bechtel et al., only 27 of the 51 patients they enrolled underwent surgical resection. Similarly, there were only 54 patients underwent operation in the study by Cortese DA et al. The sample size of the present study was different from above mentioned studies causing the difference of 5-year survival rate followed surgical resection. Besides, radiotherapy was proven to have survival benefit in the 71-case study by M Saito et al [22]. In the present study, compared with patients who didn’t receive radiotherapy, cases with radiotherapy had a better survival. These findings confirmed the results from previous study.

This study has several limitations. First, some important information (such as the invasion depth of tumor in the endobronchial wall) wasn’t detailed, as we couldn’t obtain the results of bronchoscopy and radiology in the SEER database. Thus, we did not further categorize the Tx classification. Second, cases with second primary lung cancer were excluded from the study. However, the incidence rate of occult lung cancer might be much higher in the cohort of second primary lung cancer. Therefore, the use of those findings was limited to patients with primary lung cancer. Third, because the data on histological subtypes were not detailed enough, unknown non-sarcoma cancer and unknown non-small cell carcinoma couldn’t be subdivided. Finally, this study belonged to retrospective study. Therefore, more studies are necessary to further explore the incidence rate and prognosis in patients with occult lung cancer.

Conclusions

Occult lung cancer was uncommon. However, the cancer-specific survival of occult lung cancer was poor, therefore, we should put the assessment of its prognoses on the agenda. Timely surgical treatment and radiotherapy could improve survival outcomes. Besides, we still need more research to confirm those findings.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the staff of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results for their contribution in recording medical records. Lei-Lei Wu sincerely thanks Prof. Tie-Hua Rong and Guo-Wei Ma for instructing clinical knowledge, surgery and research in thoracic oncology.

Abbreviations

NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer

SCLC

Small cell lung cancer

TNM

Tumor-lymph node-metastasis

SEER

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

RR

Risk ratio

HR

Hazard ratio

CI

Confidence interval

Authors’ contributions

LLW and DX contributed to the study design, data collection, data analyses, data interpretation, and manuscript drafting. LLW, LHQ and CWL contributed to data analyses and manuscript review. WKL, LLW, LHQ, CWL and DX contributed to data interpretation and manuscript review. All authors contributed to the final approval of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Shanghai Health Commission (2019SY072), Shanghai ShenKang Hospital Development Centre (SHDC22020218), Outstanding Young Medical Talent of Rising Star in Medical Garden of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission "Dong Xie", and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Research Fund (FK18001 & FKGG1805). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. The funding bodies played a role in the interpretation of data, in writing, and in reviewing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Any researchers interested in this study could contact corresponding author for requiring data.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital approved this study and considered this study exempt from ethical review because existing data without patient identifiers were used.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lei-Lei Wu and Chong-Wu Li contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hung JJ, Jeng WJ, Hsu WH, Huang BS, Wu YC. Time trends of overall survival and survival after recurrence in completely resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(2):397–405. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31823b564a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Edell ES, Cortese DA. Bronchoscopic localization and treatment of occult lung cancer. Chest. 1989;96(4):919–921. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.4.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Petty TL, Tockman MS, Palcic B. Diagnosis of roentgenographically occult lung cancer by sputum cytology. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23(1):59–64. doi: 10.1016/S0272-5231(03)00060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Babore AD, Tybjerg AJ, Andersen KK, Olsen TS. Occult lung cancer manifesting within the first year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(9):105023. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siegel Y, Kuker R, Danton G, Gonzalez J. Occult lung Cancer occluding a pulmonary vein with suspected venous infarction, mimicking pneumonia and a pulmonary Embolus. J Emerg Med. 2016;51(2):e11–e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carrera W, Tsamis KA, Shah R. A case of cancer-associated retinopathy with chorioretinitis and optic neuritis associated with occult small cell lung cancer. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1103-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mai H, Xia J, Wu Y, Ke J, Li J, Pan J, Chen W, Shao Y, Yang Z, Luo S, Sun Y, Zhao B, Li L. Clinical presentation and imaging characteristics of occult lung cancer associated ischemic stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(2):296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Travis WD, Rusch VW. Lung cancer - major changes in the American joint committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):138–155. doi: 10.3322/caac.21390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wu LL. Liu X, Jiang WM, Huang W, Lin P, long H, Zhang LJ, ma GW: stratification of patients with stage IB NSCLC based on the 8th edition of the American joint committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. Front Oncol. 2020;10:571. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Version 8.2020, accessed September 15, 2020).
  • 13.Navi BB, DeAngelis LM, Segal AZ. Multifocal strokes as the presentation of occult lung cancer. J Neuro-Oncol. 2007;85(3):307–309. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9419-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gilardi R, Della Rosa N, Pancaldi G, Landi A. Acrometastasis showing an occult lung cancer. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(6):550–552. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.748319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han YM, Fang LZ, Zhang XH, Yuan SH, Chen JH, Li YM. Polyarthritis as a prewarning sign of occult lung cancer. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(1):54–56. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Isohata N, Naritaka Y, Shimakawa T, Asaka S, Katsube T, Konno S, et al. Occult lung Cancer incidentally found during surgery for esophageal and gastric Cancer: a case report. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1841–1848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dardiotis E, Aloizou AM, Markoula S, Siokas V, Tsarouhas K, Tzanakakis G, Libra M, Kyritsis AP, Brotis AG, Aschner M, Gozes I, Bogdanos DP, Spandidos DA, Mitsias PD, Tsatsakis A. Cancer-associated stroke: pathophysiology, detection and management (review) Int J Oncol. 2019;54(3):779–796. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, Lammers JJ, Weenink C, Yousaf-Khan U, Horeweg N, et al. Reduced lung-Cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):503–513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sutedja TG, Codrington H, Risse EK, Breuer RH, van Mourik JC, Golding RP, Postmus PE. Autofluorescence bronchoscopy improves staging of radiographically occult lung cancer and has an impact on therapeutic strategy. Chest. 2001;120(4):1327–1332. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bechtel JJ, Petty TL, Saccomanno G. Five year survival and later outcome of patients with X-ray occult lung cancer detected by sputum cytology. Lung Cancer. 2000;30(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00190-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cortese DA, Pairolero PC, Bergstralh EJ, Woolner LB, Uhlenhopp MA, Piehler JM, Sanderson DR, Bernatz PE, Williams DE, Taylor WF, Payne WS, Fontana RS. Roentgenographically occult lung cancer. A ten-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86(3):373–380. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39149-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saito M, Yokoyama A, Kurita Y, Uematsu T, Tsukada H, Yamanoi T. Treatment of roentgenographically occult endobronchial carcinoma with external beam radiotherapy and intraluminal low-dose-rate brachytherapy: second report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(3):673–680. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Any researchers interested in this study could contact corresponding author for requiring data.


Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES