Skip to main content
Endocrine Connections logoLink to Endocrine Connections
. 2021 Aug 6;10(9):1065–1072. doi: 10.1530/EC-21-0114

Validity and reliability of the German version of the shortened thyroid-specific quality of life questionnaire (ThyPRO-39de)

Navid Tabriz 1, Kilian Gloy 1, Astrid Schantzen 1, Dennis Fried 1, Dirk Weyhe 1, Verena Uslar 1,
PMCID: PMC8428020  PMID: 34355699

Abstract

Objectives

Validation of a German version of the ThyPRO-39 questionnaire for quality of life (QoL) in patients with benign thyroid diseases.

Design

Internal consistency, retest reliability, and validity were to be assessed in a test-retest study.

Methods

The ThyPRO-39 was translated based on standard methodology. A sample of 98 patients with benign thyroid diseases was tested with the ThyPRO-39de and the generic EuroQol 5D-5L. Forty-four patients with stable symptoms after 2 weeks formed the repeated measures sample. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for the ThyPRO-39de composite score and for each disease-specific scale. Intraclass correlations between the original and the repeated measures sample were calculated for each scale as well as Pearson correlations between various ThyPRO scales and the EuroQol. T-tests were used to test for differences in the goiter and hyperthyroid symptom scales between relevant patient groups and other patients.

Results

Internal consistency was between satisfactory and good, except for two scales (tiredness and cosmetic complaints/appearance). The test-retest correlation was between 0.62 and 0.8 for most scales, but below 0.5 for two scales (tiredness and impaired social life). There were significant correlations between the EuroQol index score and most aspects of the ThyPRO-39de. Only the hyperthyroid symptoms scale was specific for the relevant patient group (Graves’ disease).

Conclusion

The ThyPRO-39de may be recommended for use in clinical and research settings, especially with regards to the composite score. However, the underlying thyroid disease should always be kept in mind when interpreting the test results. A larger sample would be needed to implement further improvements.

Keywords: quality of life, benign thyroid disease, EuroQol 5D-5L, ThyPRO-39de, questionnaire validation

Introduction

One of the main aims in medical therapy is the improvement or at least the maintenance of the quality of life (QoL). The quality of life – also referred to as health-related quality of life (HRQL) – is understood as a multidimensional construct that includes many relevant aspects of a patient's life such as physical, mental, and social factors. HRQL presents patients' subjective views of their current health-related status. Therefore, the term patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) are often being used. For an accurate assessment of HRQL, the combination of generic and disease-specific questionnaires is recommended (1, 2).

Thyroid diseases are very common worldwide, and as depicted by the Papillon study, every third German adult shows pathological changes of the thyroid gland (3). While not all of those affected need medical treatment, patients with benign thyroid diseases, such as non-toxic or toxic goiters, autoimmune disorders, or postoperative hypothyroidism, may be impaired in their QoL (2, 4). To determine patient's QoL in benign thyroid diseases, a thyroid disease-specific PRO questionnaire (ThyPRO) has been developed by Watt et al. in 2010 (5). In the following years, this questionnaire has been validated in different languages (1, 6, 7, 8) and a shorter version called ThyPRO-39 was developed (9). So far, the ThyPRO-39 has not been validated in the German language.

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of the translated German ThyPRO-39de version and to compare this disease-specific questionnaire with the generic EQ-5D-5l questionnaire, as a measure of external validity.

Methods

Patients

The research sample consists of 103 patients diagnosed with non-toxic and toxic nodular goiter, and Graves’ disease. Patients with thyroid cancer were excluded. Five participants were excluded due to incomplete data. Therefore, n = 98 patients were included in the analysis. A detailed descriptive analysis of the patient sample was performed, for the results see Table 1. Of these 98 patients, 91 participated in and completed the retest questionnaire. Out of these 91 patients, only those with self-reported stable disease symptoms and no change in medication were included in the test-retest analysis (n = 44).

Table 1.

Demographic data of the patient sample.

Total (n = 98) Graves‘ disease (n = 29) Goiter or other nodular changes (n = 69)
Sex
 Male (n; %) 21 (21.4) 4 (13.8) 17 (24.6)
 Female (n; %) 77 (78.6) 25 (86.2) 52 (75.4)
Age, mean (s.d.; range) 51.2 (14.0; 18–80) 43.9 (15.3; 18–74) 54.3 (12.2; 30–80)
BMI, mean (s.d.; range) (kg/m²) 27.9 (5.2; 17.9–44.4) 27.0 (5.5; 17.9–41) 28.3 (5.1; 18.4–44.4)
Current treatment
 L-thyroxine (n; %) 9 (9.2) 0 9 (13.0)
 Antithyroid drugs (n; %) 34 (34.7) 28 (96.6) 6 (8.7)
 Iodine (n; %) 3 (3.1) 0 3 (4.3)
 None (n; %) 52 (53.1) 1 (3.4) 51 (73.9)
Preoperative thyroid volumea
 Volume (mL) mean (s.d.; range) 50.5 (7–380) 31.1 (7–87) 59.4 (10–380)
 Above upper reference value (n; %) 78 (79.6) 22 (75.9) 56 (81.2)
Hormonal values
 TSH (µlU/mL) mean (s.d.; range) 1.3 (1.89; 0–13) 1.06 (1.99; 0–7.16) 1.39 (1.86; 0–13)
 T3 (pg/mL) mean (s.d.; range) 3.93 (2.50; 0.99–24.42) 4.33 (1.81; 0.99–8.32) 3.77 (2.72; 1.79–24.42)
 T4 (ng/dL) mean (s.d.; range) 3.68 (5.13; 0.19–25.5) 3.68 (5.52; 0.51–25.50) 3.69 (5.02; 0.19–18.72)

TSH Ref, 0.27–4.20; T3 Ref, 2.57–4.43; T4 Ref, 0.93–1.70.

aData available only for 94 out of 98 patients; normal range for thyroid volume: men < 25 mL; women < 18 mL.

The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University of Oldenburg (2017/105) and informed written consent was obtained from all participants, and it is registered with the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS; ID: DRKS00017195).

Questionnaires

ThyPRO-39de

The ThyPRO questionnaire is a well-validated questionnaire for measuring thyroid-related QoL and was developed by Watt and colleagues (5). The original version with its 85 items is rather long for clinical use, so a shorter version with 39 items was developed in 2015, which is now recommended in a clinical setting (9). The ThyPRO-39 summarizes 13 scales, namely: goiter symptoms, hyper- and hypothyroid symptoms, eye symptoms, tiredness, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depressivity, emotional susceptibility, impairment in social and daily life, cosmetic complaints, and one scale covering the influence of the disease on the overall HRQL. The ThyPRO scales are each summarized and transformed to a range of 0–100 according to a specific algorithm in order to maintain comparability with the 85-item version of ThyPRO using a spreadsheet provided by Torquil Watt. Three items (3b, 6g, and 7h) are inversed questions, which have to be changed accordingly if the original spreadsheet for the calculation of the scores or the script for SPSS is not used. Increasing scores indicate worsening symptoms and thus, a decreasing QoL.

In addition to the 13 individual scales, there is a composite scale that reflects the psychological and social aspects of QoL (9). The composite score includes all scales except the symptom-specific scales (goiter symptoms, hyper- and hypothyroid symptoms, eye symptoms).

The German version of the ThyPRO questionnaire, ThyPRO-39de, was obtained from Torquil Watt via email. It was translated to German according to the standard methodology for translation and linguistic validation for PROs (10, 11).

To ensure that missing data did not distort the results, only participants with complete ThyPRO-39de data were included (this reduced the sample from originally 103 to 98 participants).

EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ 5D-5L)

The EQ 5D-5L is well validated generic questionnaire to determine the general QoL. Today, it is available in over 130 languages, and in Germany, it has even been used as an evaluation instrument in thyroid diseases (12, 13, 14, 15). However, we hypothesize that it might be too generic to really capture thyroid-related QoL.

The EQ 5D-5L consists of two parts: a descriptive EQ-5D system with five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which has patients rate aspects of their quality of life on a five-point Likert scale. These scales are then summarized in an index value, where a high score represents a better QoL and vice versa. The second part of EQ 5D-5L consists of a visual analog scale (EQ VAS). The scale ranges from 'worst health you can imagine' (0) to 'best health you can imagine' (100) and allows a quantitative measurement of QoL.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using R (16). Figure 1 was created with the same program.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scatterplot of the composite score from the ThyPRO-39-de and the index score from the EQ 5D-5L. The line represents the regression of y on x, and the gray area denotes the 95% CI.

Reliability

Internal consistency of ThyPRO-39de was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient. An alpha coefficient of 0 indicates the total absence of consistency, while a coefficient of 1 corresponds to perfect internal consistency. However, since 100% internal consistency implies redundant information, values above 0.9 but below 1.0 are considered optimal. Values below 0.7 are not acceptable (17, 18). Cronbach’s alpha was calculated once for the entire questionnaire and then for every disease-specific scale separately. To test the quality of each item, a descriptive analysis of response distributions was performed, and the scale-specific alpha without the item in question was determined.

The test-retest reliability was assessed by repeating the questionnaire with the same participants 2 weeks after the initial test. A question regarding the development of the patient’s symptoms was added, and only those who reported stable symptoms were included in the analysis. A Pearson correlation was then performed between each scale’s transformed scores from the first and the second questionnaire.

Validity

To test the external validity of the ThyPRO-39de, a Pearson correlation was performed between the index value from the generic EQ 5D-5L and some scales of the ThyPro-39de. Specifically, the composite score and the scales goiter symptoms, hyper- and hypothyroid symptoms, and eye symptoms were correlated with the EQ’s index value. This was done to reflect both the non-specific and the thyroid-specific aspects of QoL. The generic EQ 5D-5L questionnaire was used to demonstrate the added value of using a thyroid-specific patient-reported QoL instrument. We hypothesized a low correlation between both questionnaires. This would demonstrate the additional value of the more time-consuming ThyPRO-39de.

Additionally, to evaluate known-group validity, the hyperthyroid symptom scale from the ThyPRO-39de was compared between patients with and without Graves’ disease, using an independent t-test (P = 0.05). Based on the literature, a valid questionnaire should show a worse QoL for patients with Graves’ disease (7). The same procedure was undertaken for patients with a goiter (i.e. men with sonographically confirmed thyroid size > 25 mL and women with a thyroid size > 18 mL) in comparison to patients with a thyroid size in the normal range and the goiter symptom scale.

Results

The descriptive analysis of the demographic data from the patient sample is summarized in Table 1.

Cronbach's alpha was between 0.558 and 0.910 for the individual scales and 0.901 for the composite score. Table 2 shows a complete list of each scale and the test-retest correlations, and Table 3 for the analysis of all individual items.

Table 2.

Overview of the mean, s.d., median, range (min–max), Cronbach’s alpha values, and the test-retest correlations for all ThyPRO-39de scales and the index value from the EQ 5D-5L.

Scale Mean s.d. Median Range Alpha Test-retest correlationa
ThyPRO-39de subscales
 Goiter symptoms 25.3 19.8 23.0 2–84 0.885 0.599
 Hyperthyroid symptoms 26.2 18.4 23.0 2–71 0.644 0.617
 Hypothyroid symptoms 20.9 20.6 18.8 0–75 0.724 0.660
 Eye symptoms 19.3 17.8 14.0 1–78 0.755 0.448
 Tiredness 53.3 22.3 50.0 0–100 0.558 0.257
 Cognitive complaints 19.8 22.5 14.0 1–95 0.910 0.750
 Anxiety 31.1 25.5 26.0 1–96 0.893 0.521
 Depressivity 28.5 21.4 22.0 0–89 0.740 0.638
 Emotional susceptibility 34.4 26.0 28.0 1–95 0.814 0.753
 Impaired social life 17.2 25.5 0.0 0–92 0.878 0.402
 Impaired daily life 21.5 28.5 15.0 0–98 0.900 0.768
 Cosmetic complaints/appearance 33.4 24.2 28.0 1–87 0.649 0.625
 Overall quality of life 33.4 34.0 25.0 0–100 0.773
 Composite score 30.3 19.6 26.7 1.1–84.1 0.901 0.756
EQ index value 0.88 0.15 0.91 0.23–1 −0.010

aIntraclass correlation coefficient.

Table 3.

Descriptive analysis of each item per scale and for the items used in the composite score. Shown are the relative distributions of the answers, and the value which Cronbach’s alpha would assume if the specific item was removed from the scale.

Short description Response (%) Cronbach’s alpha, if item removed from subscale Cronbach’s alpha, if item removed from composite score (original alpha: 0.901)
Not at all A little Some Quite a bit Very much
Goiter symptoms (original alpha: 0.885)
 1a Sense of fullness in the neck 34 17 23 21 4 0.787
 1c Pressure in throat 40 18 24 14 3 0.815
 1h Discomfort swallowing 42 17 24 15 1 0.898
Hyperthyroid symptoms (original alpha: 0.644)
 1l Trembling hands 61 14 12 12 0 0.470
 1m Increased sweating 37 13 19 19 11 0.555
 1n Palpitations 33 14 31 15 7 0.463
 1t Upset stomach 69 12 9 5 4 0.750
Hypothyroid symptoms (original alpha: 0.724)
 1q Sensitive to cold 62 13 10 10 4 0.804
 1cc Swollen hands/feet 60 21 13 5 0 0.611
 1dd Dry skin 33 26 20 14 7 0.626
 1ee Itchy skin 56 15 17 7 4 0.566
Eye symptoms (original alpha: 0.755)
 1w Grittiness in eyes 46 22 18 10 3 0.750
 1x Reduced sight 50 22 19 6 2 0.580
 1bb Sensitive to light 56 18 16 5 4 0.649
Tiredness (original alpha: 0.558)
 2a Been tired 16 17 35 19 12 0.155 0.894
 2c Difficulty getting motivated 32 21 28 10 9 0.124 0.892
 3b Energetic 48 22 15 12 2 0.823 0.907
Cognitive complaints (original alpha: 0.910)
 4a Problems remembering 53 20 16 7 3 0.867 0.911
 4b Slow or unclear thinking 56 28 10 3 3 0.869 0.894
 4f Difficulty concentrating 39 30 21 5 5 0.875 0.895
Anxiety (original alpha: 0.893)
 5b Afraid or anxious 38 27 21 10 4 0.844 0.893
 5c Felt tension 34 19 22 19 5 0.879 0.893
 5e Uneasy 36 31 19 10 4 0.823 0.894
Depressivity (original alpha: 0.740)
 6a Sad 48 26 15 9 2 0.481 0.892
 6e Unhappy 55 23 11 10 0 0.605 0.895
 6g Self-confident 17 21 19 39 3 0.848 0.894
Emotional susceptibility (original alpha: 0.814)
 7c Easily stressed 21 21 16 26 15 0.720 0.916
 7d Mood swings 24 24 24 15 11 0.646 0.903
 7h Felt in control 6 9 15 24 45 0.845 0.893
Impaired social life (original alpha: 0.878)
 8a Difficulty being with others 62 16 9 9 3 0.842 0.892
 8b A burden to others 72 14 7 4 2 0.841 0.922
 8c Conflicts with others 71 11 10 6 1 0.801 0.895
Impaired daily life (original alpha: 0.900)
 9a Difficulty managing daily life 60 12 10 15 2 0.856 0.895
 9c Difficulty participating in life 71 12 8 8 0 0.874 0.894
 9e Everything takes longer 54 26 3 11 6 0.836 0.895
Cosmetic complaints/appearance (original alpha: 0.649)
 11a Disease affects appearance 23 21 22 21 11 0.417 0.892
 11d Bothered by people looking 81 8 3 6 2 0.555 0.893
 11e Influence on clothes worn 67 15 6 9 2 0.640 0.893
 12 Overall impact on QoL 39 23 10 20 7 0.891

There is a significant negative correlation between the composite scale from the ThyPRO-39de and the index value from the EQ 5D-5L (P = 0.003, r = –0.299 see Fig. 1 for visualization). Almost all of the thyroid symptom-specific scales also correlated significantly with the index value (goiter symptoms: P = 0.021, r = –0.232; hyperthyroid symptoms: P = 0.032, r = –0.216; hypothyroid symptoms: P = 0.158, r = –0.144; eye symptoms: P = 0.009, r = –0.261).

The independent t-test between patients with and without Graves’ disease revealed a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.033, t(96) = 2.162). Patients with Graves’ disease had a significantly higher hyperthyroid score, indicating worse QoL (mean = 38.1, s.d. = 17.4), than patients without Graves’ disease (mean = 21.2, s.d. = 16.5). For n = 94 patients, we acquired ultrasound values prior to surgery. Patients with a thyroid size above the reference value (>25 mL for men; >18 mL for women) had comparable scores on the goiter symptoms scale (n = 79; thyroid volume (mean and range): 57.5 mL (19–380); goiter symptoms scale: mean = 24.8, s.d. = 20.3) to patients with normally sized thyroids (n = 15; thyroid volume (mean and range): 14.4 mL (7–24.3); goiter symptoms scale: mean = 26.0, s.d. = 17.6; unpaired t-test: t(91) = 0.210; P = 0.834).

Discussion

The overall internal consistency of all ThyPRO-39de items was satisfactory with alpha = 0.94. This seems to indicate that all items measure the same concept to a high degree, which would conceivably be the general quality of life. Almost all disease-specific scales have sufficient values for Cronbach’s alpha, meaning above 0.7, except for the scales tiredness and cosmetic complaints/appearance.

The alpha of tiredness could have been improved above the critical value of 0.7 by excluding the item 3b (‘Hatten Sie innerhalb der letzten vier Wochen ein energiegeladenes Gefühl?’/‘Did you feel energetic within the last four weeks?’). A similar result was reported for the Chinese adaptation of the ThyPRO-39, where the same item correlated with the tiredness scale only weakly (7). At the present time, it is difficult to be sure why this item is inconsistent with the rest of the scale. The inverse coding of the item is the only quality that obviously separates it from the others. Inversely coded items are often included to reduce floor effects, although this often comes at the cost of reliability (7, 19). Therefore, it comes as no surprise to see this effect here. However, it should be noted that the other scales with inversely coded items (depressivity and emotional susceptibility, items 6g and 7h, respectively) have acceptable alpha-values. Therefore, it seems to not just only be a problem of patients not noticing the need to switch their answering pattern. Although, it should also be noted that for the latter scales, removal of the inverse item would improve the value for Cronbach’s alpha. Based on the present analysis, item 3b and perhaps all inverse items should be treated with caution.

The scale cosmetic complaints/appearance can not be improved by excluding a single item. This implies that all three items measure slightly different, yet related aspects of QoL. All relate to the appearance of the patient, but they address self-image, perceived external perception, and behavioral changes, respectively. These subtle differences might explain the scale’s comparatively low alpha. Interestingly, the Spanish version of the ThyPRO-39 also suffered from the low alpha in the cosmetic complaints scale (8), but adaptations into other languages did not (7, 20). These circumstances make it difficult to determine whether there is a problem with the scale itself or its German adaptation.

In international comparison, the ThyPRO-39de was performing between average and well regarding the internal consistency. It was worse than the Romanian version, which had all scales above an alpha of 0.7 (19), performed just as well as the Spanish version, which also had two scales below 0.7 (8) and was better than the Chinese version, which had 6 scales below an alpha of 0.7 (7).

Most scales had a high test-retest correlation, indicating good reliability, though not as good as the original version of the ThyPRO-39 (9). Some imprecision in this measurement is impossible to avoid. All aspects measured by the ThyPRO are capable of rapid fluctuation, and even people who judge their overall symptoms to be similar may have experienced changes that reflect on specific scales. This is why the low retest-correlation in the scales tiredness and impaired social life are difficult to judge. The low correlation in tiredness could, of course, be related to the low internal consistency.

The significant correlations between the composite scale and (three out of four) thyroid symptom-specific scales on the one side and the EQ’s index value on the other side show a strong connection between the test values of both questionnaires. This may indicate validity for the ThyPRO-39de since the measurement of QoL seems to have succeeded. However, the values for Pearson’s R are only moderate for the composite scale and small for the thyroid symptom-specific scales. There are, therefore, aspects captured by the ThyPRO-39de which are not reflected in the EQ 5D-5L, and this lack of overlap is strongest in the thyroid-specific scales. This indicates that for thyroid-related research the ThyPRO-39de might be a more valid choice than the generic, albeit shorter EQ 5D-5L questionnaire. In addition, for future comparisons between studies using the ThyPRO-39de, it should be kept in mind to look at the distribution of specific diseases, especially Graves’ disease vs others, which might explain differences in QoL between studies.

The hyperthyroid symptoms scale was capable of successfully differentiating between patients with Graves’ disease and patients with other diagnoses, even though our patient collective was, in general, very well adjusted with regards to their medication. This seems to indicate that near-normal values of TSH, T3, and T4 do not automatically equal low symptomatic burden.

In contrast, we found no difference between patients with normal and enlarged thyroids concerning the goiter symptoms scale. This could be due to the fact that we divided the groups by thyroid volume (>25 mL for men; >18 mL for women) and not by symptoms. These results indicate that thyroid volume might not correlate with goiter symptoms per se. On the one hand, goiter symptoms might occur in patients with normal-sized thyroids due to the localization of the nodules, and on the other hand, patients with large thyroids may be asymptomatic for a long time.

Regrettably, the sample did not allow for more such tests for validity and specificity, which is one of the limitations of this study. Generally, a larger sample would have been preferable for these tests. While 98 patients are enough for considerations of external validity and internal consistency, the necessity of reducing the sample to the specific patient groups impedes the specificity tests. These results should, therefore, be considered with caution. In addition, it was only possible to divide patients by preoperative thyroid size for the test of the goiter symptoms scale. A comparison of patients with goiter referred for treatment with patients without goiter would maybe have yielded other results. Also, the ThyPRO-39de is not validated for use with patients with malignant diseases. Therefore, our conclusions are addressed only to patients with benign thyroid diseases. Taken together, the results of all scales but the composite score should be regarded with caution since more detailed known-groups comparisons are missing.

The strengths include our relatively homogenous patient collective with most patients being euthyroid. Also, our collective very well reflects the typical collective of patients with benign thyroid diseases in specialized German hospitals.

Conclusion

The German adaptation of the ThyPRO-39 is an internally consistent and externally valid questionnaire. The transition into a different cultural and linguistic background did not come without issues, and two or three scales within the test might need slight corrections in a future version, once larger samples are available. For now, it is a useful questionnaire, especially with regards to the composite score, that well reflects a patient’s QoL and captures the aspects of thyroid diseases that impact QoL better than generic questionnaires could. Based on this study, the ThyPRO-39de may be recommended for clinical use, with the composite score as the main outcome and the other scale scores used as exploratory or informatory outcomes. The interpretation of the test results, however, should always be based on a separate diagnosis of the underlying thyroid disease.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

References

  • 1.Watt T, Barbesino G, Bjorner JB, Bonnema SJ, Bukvic B, Drummond R, Groenvold M, Hegedüs L, Kantzer V, Lasch KEet al. Cross-cultural validity of the thyroid-specific quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, ThyPRO. Quality of Life Research 201524769–780. ( 10.1007/s11136-014-0798-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Watt T, Groenvold M, Rasmussen AK, Bonnema SJ, Hegedüs L, Bjorner JB, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Quality of life in patients with benign thyroid disorders. A review. European Journal of Endocrinology 2006154501–510. ( 10.1530/eje.1.02124) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verburg FA, Grelle I, Tatschner K, Reiners C, Luster M. Prevalence of thyroid disorders in elderly people in Germany. Nuclear Medicine 2017569–13. ( 10.3413/Nukmed-0852-16-10) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elberling TV, Rasmussen AK, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hørding M, Perrild H, Waldemar G. Impaired health-related quality of life in Graves’ disease. A prospective study. European Journal of Endocrinology 2004151549–555. ( 10.1530/eje.0.1510549) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watt T, Hegedüs L, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Rasmussen AK, Bonnema SJ, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Validity and reliability of the novel thyroid-specific quality of life questionnaire, ThyPRO. European Journal of Endocrinology 2010162161–167. ( 10.1530/EJE-09-0521) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mintziori G, Watt T, Veneti S, Panagiotou A, Pournaras DJ, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Rasmussen ÅK, Hegedüs L, Bonnema SJ, Bjorner JBet al. ThyPROgr: the Greek edition of the ThyPRO questionnaires for patients with benign thyroid diseases. Hormones 201817107–112. ( 10.1007/s42000-018-0015-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wong CKH, Choi EPH, Woo YC, Lang BHH. Measurement properties of ThyPRO short-form (ThyPRO-39) for use in Chinese patients with benign thyroid diseases. Quality of Life Research 2018272177–2187. ( 10.1007/s11136-018-1857-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boronat M, González-Lleó A, Rodríguez-Pérez C, Feldt-Rasmussen U, López-Plasencia Y, Rasmussen ÅK, Alberiche-Ruano MP, Hegedüs L, Alvarado-Martel D, Bonnema SJet al. Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Spanish version of the thyroid-related quality-of-life patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición 201865500–507. ( 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.06.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Watt T, Bjorner JB, Groenvold M, Cramon P, Winther KH, Hegedüs L, Bonnema SJ, Rasmussen ÅK, Ware Jr JE, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Development of a short version of the thyroid-related patient-reported outcome ThyPRO. Thyroid 2015251069–1079. ( 10.1089/thy.2015.0209) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee CB, Snyder CF, Schwartz C, Revicki DA, Moinpour CM, McLeod LDet al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research 2013221889–1905. ( 10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wild D, Eremenco S, Mear I, Martin M, Houchin C, Gawlicki M, Hareendran A, Wiklund I, Chong LY, von Maltzahn Ret al. Multinational trials-recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value in Health 200912430–440. ( 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schmitz-Winnenthal FH, Schimmack S, Lawrence B, Maier U, Heidmann M, Buchler MW, von Frankenberg M. Quality of life is not influenced by the extent of surgery in patients with benign goiter. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 2011396 1157–1163. ( 10.1007/s00423-011-0822-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Loucks L, Khudairy AA, Noseworthy TW. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Quality of Life Research 2015241775–1784. ( 10.1007/s11136-014-0910-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L | about 2020 [version 18APR2017]. (available at: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/) [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tabriz N, Uslar VN, Tabriz I, Weyhe D. Quality of life is not affected by thyroid surgery in nontoxic benign goitre in long-term surveillance – a prospective observational study. Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 20203 e00115. ( 10.1002/edm2.115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010. (available at https://www.R-project.org/) [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cronbach LJ.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 195116297–334. ( 10.1007/BF02310555) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education 2011253–55. ( 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Watt T, Groenvold M, Deng N, Gandek B, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Rasmussen ÅK, Hegedüs L, Bonnema SJ, Bjorner JB. Confirmatory factor analysis of the thyroid-related quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 201412 126. ( 10.1186/s12955-014-0126-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zahan AE, Watt T, Pascanu I, Rasmussen AK, Hegedüs L, Bonnema SJ, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Bjorner JB, Nadasan V, Boila Aet al. The Romanian version of the thyroid-related patient-reported outcomes ThyPRO and ThyPRO-39. Ttranslation and assessment of reliability and cross-cultural validity. Acta Endocrinologica 201814192–200. ( 10.4183/aeb.2018.192) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endocrine Connections are provided here courtesy of Bioscientifica Ltd.

RESOURCES