Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2021 Jul 12;38(10):e14629. doi: 10.1111/dme.14629

Clinical Case Conundrum: Hyperlactataemia in a Case of Type 1 Diabetes with Chronic Hyperglycaemia

Talia A Hitt 1,*, Joshua Eisenberg 2, Lea F Surrey 3, Ami Gokli 4, Edisio Semeao 2, Diva D De Leon 1,5
PMCID: PMC8429068  NIHMSID: NIHMS1717193  PMID: 34153120

Introduction

A 13-year-old girl with a 9-year history of type 1 diabetes with chronic hyperglycaemia [haemoglobin A1c 69 mmol/mol (8.5%) – 90 mmol/mol (10.4%)] presented in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). After receiving DKA treatment and ketoacidosis resolved, she had persistent metabolic acidosis with an elevated lactate. On arrival, her plasma lactate was 13.8 mmol/L and decreased to a minimum of 2.7 mmol/L by discharge. Her transaminases were also elevated (peak alanine aminotransferase 516 U/L, peak aspartate aminotransferase 1482 U/L). Lactate and transaminase elevation persisted for the subsequent 2 years, even between DKA episodes (Table 1). An ultrasound, MRI and liver biopsy were performed.

Table 1.

Pertinent Laboratory Results

Laboratory Name Peak Value around time of Initial Presentation On Discharge from Initial Hospitalisation 6 Months Later (not associated with DKA) 2 Years Later (during DKA) Most Recent (2-2.5 Years Later)
Plasma lactate (mmol/L) (normal 0.5-2.2) ** 13.8 3.6 8.2 8.4 *
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) (normal 12-32) 1482 248 32 218 17
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) (normal 5-32) 516 224 45 102 16
Lactate-to-pyruvate ratio (normal 10-20) 22 * * 22 *
Haemoglobin A1c (mmol/mol (%)) (normal < 41 (5.9)) 90 (10.4) * 102 (11.5) 125 (13.6) 73 (8.8)
*

Not tested at this time

**

Lactate Whole Blood Venous collected from Super Gas w/ Lactate Venous tested during initial hospitalisation (normal range 0.5-2.2mmol/L), Lactate Plasma tested 6 months and 2 years later (normal range 0.6-2.0 mmol/L)

Questions

  1. What diagnosis is determined through the imaging and histopathologic images shown?

  2. What are the risk factors for this condition and what is the aetiology of the associated hyperlactataemia?

  3. What are the recommended monitoring and treatment options for this condition?

Answers

  1. Glycogenic Hepatopathy. The imaging demonstrates hepatomegaly, hepatic steatosis, and an incidental hepatic abnormality consistent with an adenoma (unrelated to disease process) (Figure 1). Histopathologic examination of background liver parenchyma reveals pale hepatocytes and glycogenated nuclei by H&E stain (Figure 2A, arrowheads) with extensive PAS positive (diastase-sensitive) cytoplasmic and nuclear glycogen (Figure 2B). This case also has macrovesicular steatosis and evidence of hepatocellular damage, including acidophil bodies (Figure 2A inset), ballooning degeneration, and mitotic figures (Figure 2C, arrowhead). In conjunction with the clinical findings, the histopathologic features are most compatible with glycogenic hepatopathy. Glycogenic hepatopathy is characterised by hepatic glycogen deposits, elevated liver transaminases, and gastrointestinal symptoms.1,2 Glycogenic hepatopathy can be a presenting feature of Mauriac syndrome, a complication of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) with chronic hyperglycaemia.1–3

  2. Hepatic glycogen deposition in T1D occurs when excess glucose enters hepatocytes and is converted into glycogen, a process enhanced by the presence of high doses of insulin.2,4–6 Individuals with T1D are at highest risk for the development of glycogenic hepatopathy in the setting of persistent hyperglycaemia and high insulin doses (mean of 1.33 units/kg/day) or repeated episodes of DKA (40% of presentations occur during a DKA episode).5 Glycogenic hepatopathy occurs most frequently in adolescence-early adulthood (mean age 23.4 years), women (~70%), and with average diabetes duration of ten years.2 High plasma lactate concentrations in glycogenic hepatopathy have been described in only a few case series and are likely secondary to a defect in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, as evidenced by an elevated lactate-to-pyruvate ratio, which was noted in this case.1,7

  3. Glycogenic hepatopathy has been shown to improve with limitation of hyperglycaemia and is not known to progress to fibrosis.2,4,7 There are no established guidelines for imaging or liver biopsy if glycogenic hepatopathy is suspected, although the diagnosis can be confirmed through histopathological evaluation. Clinical status, insulin regimen, and transaminase and lactate levels should be monitored closely. Normalisation of labs should be considered a reassuring clinical finding that hepatic injury has been reversed.4,8 This diagnosis should also prompt further evaluation for other aspects of Mauriac syndrome in children and adolescents including pubertal delay or pauses and growth failure.1,2,9,10

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Radiology images demonstrating hepatic enlargement, steatosis and focal hepatic lesion. (A) Ultrasound image shows hepatic steatosis and a rounded hypoechoic lesion in the posterior right hepatic lobe (arrows) with mild peripheral vascularity (arrowhead) detected on colour Doppler, but no significant internal flow. (B) Hepatomegaly is seen on Axial T2 MRI; the lesion (arrows) is noted to be heterogeneously T2 hyperintense. There was subtle signal loss on out of phase imaging (not shown). (C) Post contrast T1 VIBE imaging shows persistent central enhancement (arrows) of the lesion and (D) restricted diffusion (arrows) on DWI.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Pathology images. A) Haematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) at 200x power shows liver with periportal hepatocytes with glycogenated nuclei (arrowheads) and zone 2-3 macrosteatosis. Apoptotic hepatocytes (acidophil bodies) were identified (inset). B) PAS stain at 200x power highlights extensive glycogen within the hepatocytes while fat droplets do not stain. C) Higher power (400x) H&E stain images of hepatocytes with reactive changes including multinucleation, mitotic figures (arrowhead), and ballooning degeneration.

Learning Points

  1. Hyperlactataemia and liver transaminase elevation in T1D, especially in the context of diabetes with chronic hyperglycaemia and recurrent DKA episodes, should prompt consideration for glycogenic hepatopathy.

  2. Glycogenic hepatopathy is confirmed through liver biopsy and histopathological evaluation.

Novelty Statement:

This case demonstrates that hyperlactataemia and liver transaminase elevation in Type 1 Diabetes, especially in the context of diabetes with chronic hyperglycaemia and recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis episodes, should prompt consideration for glycogenic hepatopathy. Glycogenic hepatopathy is most often confirmed through liver biopsy and histopathological evaluation.

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our gratitude to the medical team involved in this patient’s care. This work was supported, in part, by grant 2T32DK063688-16 (TH) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Funding Statement:

This case evaluation was conducted as part of clinical care. This work was supported, in part, by grant 2T32DK063688-16 (TH) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

DDDL reports Grants and Personal fees from Crinetics Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co, personal fees from Poxel Inc, personal fees from Rezolute, grants and personal fees from Zealand Pharma, personal fees from Soleno Therapeutics, other from Merck & Co, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no disclosures.

Footnotes

Ethics Approval & Patient Consent Statement: As a single case evaluation, ethical review and patient consent were not required per guidelines from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

References

  • 1.Brouwers MCGJ, Ham JC, Wisse E, et al. Elevated lactate levels in patients with poorly regulated type 1 diabetes and glycogenic hepatopathy: A new feature of mauriac syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(2):e11–e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khoury J, Zohar Y, Shehadeh N, Saadi T. Glycogenic hepatopathy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018;17(2):113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Najjar S, Ayash MA. The Mauriac. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1974;13(9):723–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Torbenson M, Chen YY, Brunt E, et al. Glycogenic hepatopathy: An underrecognized hepatic complication of diabetes mellitus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(4):508–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giordano S Diagnosis of hepatic glycogenosis in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(6):882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elder CJE, Natarajan A. Mauriac syndrome - A modern reality. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2010;23(3):311–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fitzpatrick E, Cotoi C, Quaglia A, Sakellariou S, Ford-Adams ME, Hadzic N. Hepatopathy of Mauriac syndrome: A retrospective review from a tertiary liver centre. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(4):354–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hudacko RM, Manoukian AV, Schneider SH, Fyfe B. Clinical resolution of glycogenic hepatopathy following improved glycemic control. J Diabetes Complications. 2008;22(5):329–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jung IA, Cho WK, Jeon YJ, et al. Hepatic glycogenosis in type 1 diabetes mellitus mimicking Mauriac syndrome. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58(6):234–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dias J, Martins S, Carvalho S, Marques O, Antunes A. Mauriac syndrome still exists. Endocrinol y Nutr (English Ed). 2013;60(5):245–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES