Abstract
Background:
Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) are recommended for survival in post-menopausal breast cancer survivors (BCS) with hormone-sensitive disease. AI Adherence is suboptimal, especially in older BCS. Joint pain is a common AI-related symptom that is associated with low AI adherence. The Using Exercise to Relieve Joint Pain in Older Breast Cancer Survivors (REJOIN) Trial will evaluate the efficacy of a self-management intervention (exercise + education) to increase knowledge/self-efficacy for symptom management, reduce joint pain and potentially increase AI adherence in older BCS planning to take AIs.
Methods:
This randomized controlled pilot trial will include sedentary BCS, 65 years and older, diagnosed with stage I-III hormone-sensitive breast cancer, who have completed primary cancer treatment and are planning to initiate AIs. We will adapt an evidence-based physical activity program for older adults that includes bi-weekly, supervised exercise sessions plus 30 minutes of education. The 16-week intervention program includes: 8-weeks of supervised sessions plus 8-weeks of self-guided home sessions with periodic phone coaching. We will conduct geriatric assessments plus measurements of exercise, joint pain, and AI adherence (baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months).
Discussion:
REJOIN is one of the first trials to exclusively target older BCS using a self-management intervention, informed by geriatric assessment and exercise physiology, to improve health outcomes in survivorship. The REJOIN trial could lay the foundation for transdisciplinary research that bridges the gap between clinical and public health perspectives in healthy aging, with the opportunity to translate clinical interventions into non-pharmacological tools for a growing, yet underserved population of older survivors.
Trial registration:
Keywords: Breast cancer survivors, Physical activity, Geriatric Oncology, Joint Pain, AI-related Arthralgia
1. Introduction
Currently, there are 16.9 million US adults that have been diagnosed with cancer, of whom 62% are ≥65 years1–3. This number is expected to reach 26 million by 2040, fueled by the rising ‘silver tsunami’ of maturing baby boomers3. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed invasive cancer among older women; 50% of all breast cancer survivors (BCS) are ≥65 years4. Many older BCS have age-related impairments, which may increase treatment side effects and negatively affect quality of life for years after primary treatment5. Early treatment side effects, like pain and sleep issues6, plus late effects, like diabetes and osteoporosis, are common for BCS7. Physical Activity (PA) is underutilized yet vital for mitigating treatment-related side effects8.
The American Cancer Society and other organizations recommend survivors achieve 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity PA, plus ≥2 muscle-strengthening sessions per week9, 10. Further, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) adapted exercise guidelines for cancer survivors, based on recovery stage, from rehabilitation to long-term recovery11, 12. Despite the benefits, as few as 10% of BCS achieve recommended PA13, 14. Older survivors are vastly understudied15, but the benefits of PA and lifestyle research for them are paramount16, 17. Still, few PA programs are designed with their needs in mind.
Predominantly, BCS are post-menopausal with hormone-receptor positive tumors, for which AIs are the recommended treatment18, 19. Based on survival benefits20, 21, experts first recommended continuous AI use as adjuvant hormonal therapy for 5 years after primary treatment, but there is now evidence to consider extending for up to 10 years22–24. However, up to 50% of BCS do not complete therapy as recommended, owing partly to unmanaged symptom burden25–27. Arthralgia, which includes joint pain and stiffness, is a known but poorly understood AI side effect affecting up to 50% of users and persists as a major reason for early AI discontinuation in BCS28, 29. Despite the high prevalence of AI-related arthralgias (“arthralgia”), the etiology of this adverse effect remains unclear30, 31. Treatment strategies often include analgesics which provide short-term arthralgia relief, but may have their own deleterious side effects (e.g., dizziness, stomach upset)30. Increasingly, non-pharmacological approaches are needed to provide safe, long-term relief to help survivors cope with treatment side effects32.
The Using Exercise to Relieve Joint Pain and Improve AI Adherence in Older Breast Cancer Survivors (REJOIN) trial builds on previous trials seeking to address arthralgia and AI adherence through education-only33, 34 or exercise-only programs35, 36. Programs combining education and exercise are key, but previous studies have not been tailored to older BCS31, 37. This intervention will do both, building on the Chronic Disease Self-Management Model38–40. Self-management programs that include exercise are a well-known and effective means of addressing arthritis and similar conditions in older adults41, 42. By using exercise training and engaging users early (i.e., at AI initiation), there is an opportunity to proactively address arthralgia and concurrently promote exercise in older BCS, both important survivorship goals.38, 43–45
1.1. Aims and Hypotheses
The purpose of this pilot study is to adapt an evidence-based exercise program (Fit & Strong!)45,46 for older adults and test the efficacy of this self-management approach combining education- and exercise-based strategies (treatment group) compared to education only (control group) for improving arthralgia in older breast cancer survivors (≥65 years).
1: Adapt an evidence-based Physical Activity (PA) intervention based on educational needs of older cancer survivors planning to take AIs.
The steps are: a) Consult with clinicians on scientific advisors to adapt content relevant to the joint and breast cancer issues; b) Conduct interviews with older BCS who are eligible for adjuvant hormonal therapy; c) adapt educational content on AIs and arthralgia; d) Conduct an open pilot with three volunteers to pre-test suitability of adapted module with potential users. Based on user feedback, final changes will be made to the educational approach prior to implementation of intervention.
2: Test the effect of a pilot intervention on arthralgia and behavioral predictors for AI medication adherence (e.g., knowledge and self-efficacy).
Hypothesis 1:
Participants in the treatment group will have less arthralgia/joint pain than controls.
Hypothesis 2:
Participants in the treatment group will have more knowledge and better self-efficacy to use exercise to manage arthralgia than controls.
3: Test the effect of a pilot intervention on adherence to aromatase inhibitors.
Hypothesis 3:
Participants in the treatment group will have better AI adherence than controls.
2. Methods
2.1. Trial Design
The Using Exercise to Relieve Joint Pain and Improve AI Adherence in Older Breast Cancer Survivors (REJOIN) trial is a two-armed, pilot randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of self-management program to teach exercise-and education-based methods for arthralgia management upon initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy. The intervention will include supervised group exercise followed by a self-guided, home-based version of this program. The control group will receive enhanced standard care (i.e., information plus standard care); the treatment group will receive information plus a supervised exercise and education program (adapted version of Fit & Strong!).
All participants will complete data collection at baseline (T0), 4 months (T1), 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T3). All participants randomized to the treatment group will first receive a one-on-one consultation with an American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)-certified exercise trainer. The primary intervention components include: 1) a bi-weekly self-management program that includes 60 minutes of supervised exercise (low-impact aerobics plus light weights) and 30 minutes of education and discussion about breast cancer survivorship (90 minutes total/session). The first 8 weeks of the program occur in a live, remote group format (via Zoom technology) led by the exercise trainer (16 supervised sessions), followed by another 8 weeks using a self-guided, home version of the program, reinforced with individualized phone coaching every other week (five calls). Owing to the remote format of the intervention, additional modules on use of Zoom technology and a separate instructional session on how to use weights safely were added. More details about the flow of the intervention delivery are available in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Diagram of Intervention.

AI = Aromatase Inhibitors; Rx = Prescription; PA = Physical Activity
The REJOIN Trial protocol was initially approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine on February 25, 2020. Due to COVID-19 restrictions and required protocol modifications, the recruitment and enrollment period was delayed but resumed in May 2021. The primary funding for this study is from the American Cancer Society, with supplementary funding from the Penn State Cancer Institute and Highmark Corporation (see Funding Acknowledgements for more information).
2.2. Eligibility Criteria
All participants will be screened and enrolled using the eligibility and exclusion criteria listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Eligibility Criteria
| Inclusion criteria: |
|---|
| -- For interviews to inform adaptation process (Aim 1): |
| • Female breast cancer survivor, aged ≥ 65 years |
| • Experience taking AIs for adjuvant hormonal therapy |
| -- For the pretest (Aim 1) and main trial (Aims 2 and 3) criteria are: |
| • Female, aged ≥ 65 years at the start of study |
| • Planning to initiate AIs, or are <12 weeks from initiating |
| • Diagnosed stages I-III breast cancer |
| • ER+ tumor (at least 5% of cells) |
| • Completed surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy |
| • Independent ambulator (verified by treating clinician/staff) |
| • Physician approval to start an exercise program |
| • Currently sedentary (<60 min. of physical activity per week) |
| • Able to complete surveys and forms/ understand English |
| • Agree to random assignment to treatment or control group |
| • Can commit to 8 weeks, bi-weekly classes offered by Zoom video |
| • Must have internet access or data plan to support video streamlining |
| • Minimum cognitive impairment (verified by cognitive screening questions administered by phone) |
| Exclusion criteria: |
| -- For interviews (Aim 1): the BCS have no experience taking AIs (did not need hormonal therapy or chose not to initiate the therapy). |
| -- For the pretest (Aim 1) and main trial (Aims 2 and 3) exclusion criteria are: |
| • Already taking AIs (may participate if 12 weeks or less after initiating) |
| • Presence of metastatic cancer or concurrent malignancy requiring treatment |
| • Recent history (past 6 months) of stroke/ MI, atrial fibrillation or class 3, 4 heart failure |
| • Recent joint surgery or conditions limiting physical activity. |
2.3. Recruitment and Screening Methods
Recruitment for Aim 1 – Adaptation process: Interviews and Pretest
Participants will be recruited through the breast oncology team at the Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI) and the Penn State Community Sciences and Health Outcomes Core to recruit 3 older breast cancer survivors from the community for one-on-one interviews to review the proposed content for the REJOIN participant workbook and identify any changes needed based on readability, clarity, cultural considerations and ease of use. The feedback will be synthesized and compared to feedback received from clinicians on the grant’s scientific advisory committee about any content changes needed to ensure appropriateness of advice for older BCS.
This same process will be used to recruit participants in the pretest activity for the trial. Participants in the pretest will be expected to meet similar eligibility criteria as those in Aims 2 and 3.
Recruitment for Aims 2 and 3
Participants will be recruited at the Penn State Cancer Institute, and at affiliated clinics of Penn State Health (https://www.pennstatehealth.org). For AIMs 2 and 3, research staff will monitor breast oncology schedules and review the electronic medical record (EMR) to confirm potentially eligible participants. Research staff will secure permission from the treating physician prior to approaching the patient. Once this is obtained, staff will then contact the patient to ensure eligibility for enrollment once their primary treatment is completed.
Additionally, the clinicians will be asked to refer patients to staff before completion of primary cancer treatment. Staff will then review the EMR to confirm that they are potentially eligible and contact the patient to ensure eligibility for enrollment once their primary treatment is completed. This timing is critical to achieve the aims of the study, as joint pain can occur soon after initiating AI medication in the post-treatment phase. The breast team clinicians have agreed to assist with identifying breast cancer patients and providing information about the study, who will then be approached by research staff after review of medical records and with permission from their attending physician. Once the oncologist or referring physician provides approval that the patient is cleared to participate in the study, research staff will be able to contact the patient directly, using appropriate scripts. Additionally, an IRB-compliant recruitment flyer will be used to advertise the study in clinics and provide an overview of the eligibility requirements, general information, and contact information. A telephone and zoom-based recruitment script will be provided to study staff to maintain consistency. The study will also be listed on StudyFinder (www.studyfinder.psu.edu), a web-based recruitment tool for Penn State researchers, managed and sponsored by Penn State Clinical Translational Science Institute.
2.4. Intervention
2.4.1. Theoretical Framework and Conceptual Model
This intervention will build on Lorig’s work with the Chronic Disease Self-Management Model38–40. Self-management principles stem from Social Cognitive Theory46, which posits that sufficient knowledge about one’s health is first required to obtain necessary skills, set goals, make plans and negotiate barriers to achieve them. In the agentic perspective, these steps enhance perceived behavioral capability to do a behavior and may increase the likelihood of doing that behavior and of repeating it in the future26,47, 48 (Figure 2). Social support can also be important for engagement and maintenance of healthy behaviors, which REJOIN will also assess. Self-management programs that include physical activity are a well-known and effective means of addressing arthritis and similar conditions in older adults41, 42. By using exercise training principles, including gradually bringing participants along in exercise, and engaging users early (i.e., at AI initiation), there is an opportunity to proactively address arthralgia and concurrently promote physical activity in older survivors. These approaches address the call to put older patients’ preferences and abilities first, shifting their role from participant to partner on the team49 in managing their health needs and survivorship care50. This underscores an opportunity to help older survivors learn about side effects of treatment and the unique benefits/ways of using exercise to manage symptoms and promote QOL in recovery38, 43–45.
Figure 2. Conceptual Model for REJOIN (derived from Social Cognitive Theory).

REJOIN = The Using Exercise to Rel ieve Join t Pain and Improve AI Adherence in Older Breast Cancer Survivors (REJOIN) trial
AI = Aromatase Inhibitors
2.4.2. Adaptation of Curriculum for Older BCS for Primary Intervention
For Aim 1, the process will include a series of iterative steps to adapt the intervention in preparation for conducting a randomized pilot trial with older BCS. The team used the National Cancer Institute’s Research-Tested Interventions Programs (RTIPS) resource to identify Fit & Strong! as a viable program option, given its specific evidence for use with older adults, its effectiveness in addressing osteoarthritis (a similar condition to arthralgia) and its combination of resistance training, aerobic exercise and educational sessions intended to promote self-management skills51–53.
Adaptation Procedures.
RTIPS also provides guidelines for systematic adaptation of evidence-based health promotion programs to address unique needs of special populations54, 55. Our process will follow three steps:
First, the research team will work with a team of scientific and clinical experts in exercise oncology, breast oncology, geriatric oncology, rheumatology and primary care advisors, mainly from Penn State College of Medicine, to identify content areas that may need to be adapted to fit the needs of older BCS.
Second, the team will recruit 3 older BCS to review and mark up the proposed intervention materials and participate in one-on-one, in-depth phone interviews to assess readability, clarity and cultural appropriateness. The plan is to record and transcribe the interviews verbatim and use them for thematic content analysis.
Third, the revised versions of the material will undergo a final test through an “open pilot” or preliminary study to pre-test the appropriateness of this adapted intervention with older BCS56. In this method, 3 new participants that would be eligible to participate in the main intervention will be invited to pre-test exercise and educational modules and provide feedback through a final set of semi-structured interviews. As part of the interview, participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the final set of materials and session on a scale of 1 to 10. It was determined that a revised intervention would be considered acceptable if it received a mean satisfaction rating of 7 or higher for participants. Based on these assessments, required modifications would be made and the intervention would move forward in pilot testing.
2.4.3. Primary Intervention Arm
The active, primary intervention for REJOIN includes two main components (supervised sessions and a self-guided, at-home session) delivered over a 16-week period.
-
Initial visit and supervised sessions. At the initial clinical visit, all participants will receive printed information (i.e., written material based on American Cancer Society (ACS) web content on Hormone Therapy for Breast Cancer) at the baseline visit. In addition to information about hormonal treatment, the treatment group will receive a one-on-one exercise consultation with an ACSM-certified exercise trainer, followed by a modified version of the Fit & Strong! program, which includes bi-weekly supervised group exercise (60 minutes) and educational sessions (30 minutes) supported by a detailed participant manual.
The supervised exercise sessions include light weights or resistance bands plus low-impact aerobic exercise (provided by study), in which movements will be explained, demonstrated and modified based on the needs of participants. Participants will be keeping weekly exercise logs to track their progress and to bring questions to the exercise trainers. Educational materials will provide information about the purpose of AI medications (e.g., to reduce cancer recurrence) in layperson language and basic information about potential treatment side effects. As part of in-person sessions, participants will develop a personalized plan to continue exercise at home. Participants can do an activity of their choice (e.g., walking) and use resistance bands which will be provided for the at-home program which will begin after 8 weeks, and will include bi-monthly phone calls to assess progress and reinforce the program. Educational sessions will be modified to reflect relevant content and advice for older survivors beginning AIs. Assessments will be taken at T0, T1, T2 and at follow up on T3.
-
Self-guided, at home exercise. During the self-guided, home portion of the exercise program, treatment group participants will execute their personalized exercise plan, use their participant manual and be provided with exercise weights and resistance bands. All participants in the treatment group will be encouraged to identify a workout partner or “buddy” (a friend or family member of their choice) as social support to encourage maintenance of activity.
During the at-home portion of the intervention, participants will also receive phone calls from their exercise trainer. The ACSM-certified exercise trainer will call each treatment group participant on five occasions to facilitate exercise maintenance using specific strategies (such as recommending individual exercise modifications based on preferences and symptom burden) to help participants move through this part of their cancer journey57. The first two calls will be made weekly, followed by three calls made approximately two weeks apart. The trainer will ask about progress with the exercise program, including strength training, as well as any adverse events. Trainers will review progress, identify and troubleshoot any barriers the participants are experiencing and provide encouragement to continue. A phone script will be provided to trainers to promote consistency with trial goals.
2.4.3.1. Enhanced Standard Care Arm
Participants in the enhanced standard care arm will receive printed information (i.e., written material based on American Cancer Society web content on Hormone Therapy for Breast Cancer) at the baseline visit, in addition to standard care recommended by their treating physician. They will also participate in assessment visits at T1, T2 and T3, similar to participants in the treatment group.
2.5. Measures
Once BCS are confirmed as eligible, participants will provide consent, and schedule a baseline visit (T0) during which they will provide research staff with a variety of clinical measures, including a grip strength assessment and geriatric assessment (including a cognitive function assessment and a Timed Up and Go test). All participants will also receive an Actigraph®GT3X+ accelerometer on an elasticized waist band along with instructions for wear (i.e., wear for 7 days and return by mail on the 8th day) for an objective assessment of physical activity. One day of wear will require at least 10 hours of accelerometer wear time. Cutpoints for light, moderate and vigorous intensity activity will correspond with recommended levels for older adults58. At the clinical visits, participants will be provided with additional written surveys to complete on their own and return to research staff using pre-paid envelopes within two weeks.
The same set of measures (described in the Table 2) will be repeated at T1, T2 and T3.
Table 2.
Measures (Aims 2 &3)
| Physical Activity | |
|---|---|
| CHAMPS Questionnaire59 | Frequency and time spent in strenuous, moderate, and mild PA over past 7 days |
| Exercise Logs | Daily frequency, duration and intensity of PA recorded in personal diaries provided to participants. Participants may also record comments about “how they felt” that day. |
| Actigraph Accelerometer (GT3X+) | Participants will wear for 7 consecutive days (except when bathing or swimming) after assessments |
| AI-induced Arthralgia | |
| Brief Pain Inventory (Modified for Joint Pain)60 | Degree to which overall pain interferes with activities (0–10 point scale) over past 7 days |
| Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)61 | Self-reported pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) in lower extremities |
| Quick DASH62 | 11-items for pain or limitations in upper extremities |
| Grip Strength63 | Average value (kilograms force) of three squeezes of handgrip dynamometer (staff administered) |
| Behavioral Predictors | |
| Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale64 | Confidence in ability to do exercise |
| Social Support for Exercise Scale65 | Support for exercise received from family, friends, others |
| Knowledge about Breast Cancer Treatment and Survivorship (Toronto Informational Needs Questionnaire -- Breast Cancer [TINQ])66 | Knowledge of breast cancer treatment and side effects, benefits of treatment for cancer control, importance of healthy lifestyle in survivorship |
| Morisky-Green Medication Adherence 67 | 4-item medication adherence assessment |
| Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment68–70 | |
| Timed “Up and Go” (mobility and balance)71 | Simple mobility assessment. Patient asked to: Stand up, walk 3 meters, turn around, sit down. Expected time is 12 seconds or less. |
| Orientation Memory Concentration Test 72 | 6-item cognitive assessment (≥ 11 points indicates gross impairment) |
| OARS Functional Assessment73 | 7-items on IADLs (daily living) (Included in Cancer and Aging Research Group [CARG] questionnaire) |
| Medical Outcomes Survey74 | 10 items on Physical Function, 3 on Social Activities/Engagement (Included in CARG Questionnaire) |
| General Health (OARS)73 | Checklist of 12 co-morbidities (other than cancer) (Included in CARG Questionnaire) |
| Depression75 | 5-items, Geriatric Depression Scale |
| Medication Inventory | Patient reports up to 15 medications or supplements they are currently taking (over the counter or prescribed). May be assisted by staff or family, if needed, to complete list. (Included in CARG Questionnaire) |
| Falls | “How many times have you fallen in last 6 months?” (Included in CARG Questionnaire) |
| Current Self-Rated Health76 | Single item, “How would you rate your health right now?” 8-point scale, “Normal” to “Severely Disabled” (Included in CARG Questionnaire) |
| Blood draw for inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, TNFα, C-reactive protein [CRP])77, 78 | All participants will provide a blood draw (2 tsp) at their clinical visits. All will be instructed to fast for 8 hours beforehand. |
| Physical Measurements | |
| Height, Weight,& BMI | Calculate norms and averages for the study participants |
2.6. Primary and Secondary Outcomes
There will be three primary endpoints for this study that correspond with our hypotheses. These are: changes in joint pain (Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Arthralgia); changes in behavioral predictors (knowledge about breast cancer and self-efficacy) to use exercise to manage arthralgia and; AI medication adherence, defined as 80% medication adherence ratio, consistent with current American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Those that have achieved 80% medical possession ratio (MPR) according to medical records will be viewed as adherent for this study. The assessment will also include self-reported medication adherence, using the Morisky-Green medication adherence scale (see Table 2).
To contextualize the primary outcomes for our population of older BCS, the study will also incorporate several secondary outcomes, including self-reported physical activity, cancer-specific geriatric assessment and a blood draw as part of the trial to understand the clinical and biological mechanisms of arthralgia in older breast cancer survivors. The geriatric assessment will include a battery of validated measures most relevant to older cancer survivors, including functional assessment, cognitive assessment, medication history and self-reported health which provide important data to interpret main effects in the context of geriatric experiences. The fasting blood draw will take place at each of four assessment visits and collect about two teaspoons of blood. Plasma concentrations of three inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, TNFα, C-reactive protein [CRP]) will be measured at 4 time points (T0, T1, T2 and T3). These biomarkers have known associations with physical dysfunction in older adults77, 78 and will be informative in future analysis and targeting of onset of AI-related symptoms.
2.7. Randomization
Following completion of baseline assessments, n=76 participants will be randomized 1:1 to a treatment group and enhanced standard care group (n=38 each) using computer-generated algorithms in REDCAP, with stratification based on age groups (65–75, >75 years) and non-cancer co-morbidities (<2 v. ≥2 co-morbidities). The staff member setting up the REDCAP randomization will not the be PI and staff will use a concealed allocation process.
2.8. Covariates
In addition to our secondary outcomes, age, race/ethnicity, co-morbidities, BMI, education, marital status, cancer treatment modalities and tumor stage will be examined as potential confounders and controlled as needed.
2.9. Sample Size
Based on effect sizes of similar trials (e.g., an 0.9-point group difference for joint pain severity79) and an expected attrition rate of 25% in this pilot trial, we determined that a sample size of 76 participants (38 in each group) would be sufficient to detect a small standardized effect size of 0.33 standard deviation units between groups, based on 80% power and alpha = 0.10. We chose a larger alpha to establish statistical significance because this is a pilot study, which may be refined/retested in the future in a fully-power trial.
2.10. Statistical Analysis
There will be three primary endpoints for this study that correspond with our hypotheses. These are: changes in joint pain (arthralgia); changes in behavioral predictors (knowledge and exercise self-efficacy) to use exercise to manage arthralgia and AI Adherence. To test these hypotheses, we will use means and standard deviations (SDs) to estimate the magnitude of the effects for joint pain, knowledge and exercise self-efficacy, and we will apply a blocked analysis of variance (ANOVA) using blocks with four strata levels to assess statistically significant overall differences between groups. We will also use the MPR ratio based on self-reported adherence (AI adherence=80% MPR) and examine predictors of AI adherence using linear regression. We will assess covariates including age, race/ethnicity, co-morbidities, BMI, education, marital status, treatment modalities, tumor stage, and self-rated health as potential confounders and control for them as needed. We will confirm adherence via clinical prescription refill records. It is anticipated that treatment group participants will adhere to ≥70% of planned sessions to be compliant with the program protocol.
3. Discussion
In this trial, we will evaluate whether a self-management intervention that combines exercise-based and educational strategies can improve AI-related joint pain and AI medication adherence in older BCS that have recently initiated adjuvant hormonal therapy. Increasing, physical activity is an important and well-recognized strategy for improving many health outcomes in BCS79 and has been demonstrated to be specifically beneficial for relieving arthralgia80. However, previous exercise protocols did not use a self-management intervention and were not studied in the context of geriatric assessment with BCS. Geriatric assessment will provide a valuable way to adapt future programs and identify BCS that would benefit most from exercise interventions. Geriatric assessment can also be repeated over time to continue to adjust for the needs of the survivor. In a complementary fashion, we hope that the blood draws can help generate preliminary data on the relationship between systemic inflammation and onset of arthralgia occurring during adjuvant hormonal therapy. This will inform design of future behavioral intervention studies by identifying those at highest risk for AI-related arthralgia and support targeted use of exercise as an anti-inflammatory intervention.
Additionally, most other programs did not assess the impact of improvements in arthralgia on AI adherence, which REJOIN will do. One of the unique features of REJOIN is the plan to provide supervised exercise sessions first and then offer an at-home exercise program to allow participants to practice their skills and assess their ability to maintain the program with limited coaching. This should provide valuable insight on the necessary amount and timing of contact with the intervention team for future study. Hughes et al. observed positive results in the original Fit and Strong! trial, with a retention rate of 68% and overall participation of 75% for 24, bi-weekly exercise/educational sessions with adults with a mean age of 73 years52, without adverse events. Adapting to the abilities and interests of the participants increased exercise self-efficacy and participation among older adults in this and similar studies51–53.
There are limitations to our approach. It is uncertain that the adaptation process will correctly identify every necessary change or that REJOIN intervention will improve arthralgia or AI Adherence for every BCS. However, this will be the first step in an important process. The core strength of this proposal is its contribution for older BCS to maintain recommended survivorship care safely and comfortably. We believe our approach to start with geriatric assessment, integrate individual consultations with ACSM-certified exercise trainers and other activities known to be safe and effective with older adults, will empower BCS with the tools they need for long-term recovery. Further, using Zoom technology for exercise instruction may be cutting edge, as use of technology has been accelerated by COVID-1981, 82 and may be even more sustainable as payors increasingly support telemedicine for clinical and supportive care83.
At the conclusion of this study, the expectation is to have demonstrated the preliminary efficacy of the REJOIN intervention to reduce joint pain (arthralgia), increased knowledge and self-efficacy, and potentially improve AI Adherence for older BCS. Further, we will provide evidence about the advantages of using geriatric assessment to contextualize results in an exercise study exclusively focused on geriatric survivors. Findings from this study will be used to calculate sample sizes for a larger efficacy trial and refine the approach for that study. Additional research is needed to further classify the etiology of arthralgia and integrate these findings into future refinements of an exercise protocol for older BCS.
Funding acknowledgements:
Dr. Bluethmann is supported by a Mentored Research Scholar Grant in Applied and Clinical Research, MSRG-18-136-01-CPPB, from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and a developmental grant from the Penn State Cancer Institute/Highmark Corporation.
Dr. Klepin is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Aging under Award No. R33AG059206
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of ACS or NIH.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Edwards BK, Noone A, Mariotto AB, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(9):1290–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016;66(1):7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the “Silver Tsunami”: Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2016;25(7):1029–1036. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. based on November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Naeim A, Aapro M, Subbarao R, Balducci L. Supportive Care Considerations for Older Adults With Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(24):2627–2634. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mustian KM, Sprod LK, Janelsins M, Peppone LJ, Mohile S. Exercise Recommendations for Cancer-Related Fatigue, Cognitive Impairment, Sleep problems, Depression, Pain, Anxiety, and Physical Dysfunction: A Review. Oncol Hematol Rev. 2012;8(2):81–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bellury LM, Ellington L, Beck SL, Stein K, Pett M, Clark J. Elderly cancer survivorship: An integrative review and conceptual framework. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2011;15(3):233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(11):815–840. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs207 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Denlinger CS, Ligibel JA, Are M, et al. Survivorship: Healthy Lifestyles, Version 2.2014. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2014;12(9):1222–1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2012;62(1):30–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1409–1426. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolin KY, Schwartz AL, Matthews CE, Courneya KS, Schmitz KH. Implementing the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. J Support Oncol. 2012;10(5):171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.001 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Underwood J M, Townsend J S, Stewart S L, et al. Surveillance of Demographic Characteristics and Health Behaviors Among Adult Cancer Survivors -- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2009. MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMM. 2012;61(1):1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith SG, Chagpar AB. Adherence to Physical Activity Guidelines in Breast Cancer Survivors. Am Surg. 2010;76(9):962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hurria A, Levit LA, Dale W, et al. Improving the Evidence Base for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chakravarty EF, Hubert HB, Krishnan E, Bruce BB, Lingala VB, Fries JF. Lifestyle Risk Factors Predict Disability and Death in Healthy Aging Adults. Am J Med. 2012;125(2):190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, et al. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(3):167–189. doi: 10.3322/caac.21265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chlebowski RT, Kim J, Haque R. Adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer adjuvant and prevention settings. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014;7(4):378–387. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0389 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mayer EL, Burstein HJ. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women: Type and duration. The Breast. 2015;24:S126–S128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arimidex Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination Trialists’ Group, Buzdar A, Howell A, et al. Comprehensive side-effect profile of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: long-term safety analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(8):633–643. doi: S1470–2045(06)70767–7 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2013;381(9869):805–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(23):3784–3796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3756 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Griggs JJ. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on ovarian suppression summary. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12(4):390–393. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.011239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burstein HJ, Temin S, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(21):2255–2269. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Murphy CC, Bartholomew LK, Carpentier MY, Bluethmann SM, Vernon SW. Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(2):459–478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fontein DBY, Seynaeve C, Hadji P, et al. Specific Adverse Events Predict Survival Benefit in Patients Treated With Tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitors: An International Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Trial Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31(18):2257–2264. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bluethmann S, Murphy C, Tiro J, Mollica M, Vernon S, Bartholomew L. Deconstructing Decisions to Initiate, Maintain, or Discontinue Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study. Oncology nursing forum. 2017;44(3):E101–E110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cahir C, Guinan E, Dombrowski SU, Sharp L, Bennett K. Identifying the determinants of adjuvant hormonal therapy medication taking behaviour in women with stages I-III breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(12):1524–1539. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burstein HJ. Aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgia syndrome. The Breast. 2007;16(3):223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gaillard S, Stearns V. Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone and musculoskeletal effects: new evidence defining etiology and strategies for management. Breast Cancer Research. 2011;13(2):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Niravath P Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia: a review. Annals of Oncology. 2013. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jim HS, Richardson SA, Golden-Kreutz DM, Andersen BL. Strategies used in coping with a cancer diagnosis predict meaning in life for survivors. Health Psychol. 2006;25(6):753–761. doi: 2006-20659-010 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Heisig SR, Shedden-Mora MC, von Blanckenburg P, et al. Informing women with breast cancer about endocrine therapy: effects on knowledge and adherence. Psychooncology. 2015;24(2):130–137. doi: 10.1002/pon.3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hadji P, Blettner M, Harbeck N, et al. The Patient’s Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) Program: a randomized, in-practice study on the impact of a standardized information program on persistence and compliance to adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1505–1512. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds653 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DeNysschen C, Burton H, Ademuyiwa F, Levine E, Tetewsky S, O’Connor T. Exercise intervention in breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor‐associated arthralgia: a pilot study. European journal of cancer care. 2014;23(4):493–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nyrop KA, Muss HB, Hackney B, Cleveland R, Altpeter M, Callahan LF. Feasibility and promise of a 6-week program to encourage physical activity and reduce joint symptoms among elderly breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitor therapy. Journal of geriatric oncology. 2014;5(2):148–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Cabling ML, Lobo T, Dash C, Sheppard VB. Behavioral Interventions to Enhance Adherence to Hormone Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Literature Review. Clinical Breast Cancer. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of behavioral medicine. 2003;26(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–971. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233678.80203.c1 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity and arthritis overview. Physical activity.The arthritis pain reliever. 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Minor MA, Nielsen PJ. Physical activity interventions among adults with arthritis: meta-analysis of outcomes. 2008;37(5):307–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Graves KD. Social cognitive theory and cancer patients’ quality of life: a meta-analysis of psychosocial intervention components. Health psychology. 2003;22(2):210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, et al. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA. 2011;61(1):50–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Risendal BC, Dwyer A, Seidel RW, Lorig K, Coombs L, Ory MG. Meeting the challenge of cancer survivorship in public health: results from the evaluation of the chronic disease self-management program for cancer survivors. Evidence-Based Programming for Older Adults. 2015:172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bandura A Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–287. doi: DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Glasgow RE, Davis CL, Funnell MM, Beck A. Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2003;29(11):563–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Foster C, Fenlon D. Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:S21–S28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Goodwin JS. Geriatrics and the limits of modern medicine. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(16):1283–1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hurria A, Mohile SG, Dale W. Research priorities in geriatric oncology: addressing the needs of an aging population. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(2):286–288. doi: 10/2/286 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Seymour RB, Hughes SL, Campbell RT, Huber GM, Desai P. Comparison of two methods of conducting the fit and strong! program. Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61(7):876–884. doi: 10.1002/art.24517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hughes SL, Seymour RB, Campbell RT, et al. Long-term impact of fit and strong! On older adults with osteoarthritis. Gerontologist. 2006;46(6):801–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hughes SL, Seymour RB, Campbell R, Pollak N, Huber G, Sharma L. Impact of the Fit and Strong Intervention on Older Adults with Osteoarthritis. Gerontologist. 2004;44(2):217–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Boyle L, Homer M. . Using what works: adapting evidence-based programs to fit your needs.National Cancer Institute.
- 55.Krivitsky LN, Parker SJ, Pal A, Meckler L, Shengelia R, Reid MC. A systematic review of health promotion and disease prevention program adaptations: how are programs adapted?. 2012.
- 56.Stull VB, Snyder DC, Demark-Wahnefried W. Lifestyle Interventions in Cancer Survivors: Designing Programs That Meet the Needs of This Vulnerable and Growing Population. The Journal of Nutrition. 2007;137(1):243S–248S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schmitz KH, Campbell AM, Stuiver MM, et al. Exercise is medicine in oncology: engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(6):468–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barnett A, van den Hoek D, Barnett D, Cerin E. Measuring moderate-intensity walking in older adults using the ActiGraph accelerometer. BMC geriatrics. 2016;16(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–1840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Polson K, Reid D, McNair PJ, Larmer P. Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Man Ther. 2010;15(4):404–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Morales L, Pans S, Verschueren K, et al. Prospective study to assess short-term intra-articular and tenosynovial changes in the aromatase inhibitor–associated arthralgia syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26(19):3147–3152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993;16(1):103–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Galloway S, Graydon J, Harrison D, et al. Informational needs of women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer: development and initial testing of a tool. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(6):1175–1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ben AJ, Neumann CR, Mengue SS. The Brief Medication Questionnaire and Morisky-Green test to evaluate medication adherence. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46:279–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, et al. Developing a cancer‐specific geriatric assessment. Cancer. 2005;104(9):1998–2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hurria A Management of elderly patients with cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(5 Suppl):698–701. doi: 11/5S/698 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(24):2595–2603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schechter R, Schimmel H. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140(6):734–739. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.6.734 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA. The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol. 1981;36(4):428–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ware JE J, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Marquez DX, McAuley E, Motl RW, et al. Validation of Geriatric Depression Scale–5 Scores Among Sedentary Older Adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006;66(4):667–675. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Loprinzi CL, Laurie JA, Wieand HS, et al. Prospective evaluation of prognostic variables from patient-completed questionnaires. North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(3):601–607. doi: 10.1200/jco.1994.12.3.601 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bower JE, Ganz PA, Irwin MR, Kwan L, Breen EC, Cole SW. Inflammation and behavioral symptoms after breast cancer treatment: do fatigue, depression, and sleep disturbance share a common underlying mechanism?. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(26):3517–3522. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1154 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Collado-Hidalgo A, Bower JE, Ganz PA, Cole SW, Irwin MR. Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(9):2759–2766. doi: 12/9/2759 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kilari D, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Mohile SG, et al. Designing exercise clinical trials for older adults with cancer: Recommendations from 2015 Cancer and Aging Research Group NCI U13 Meeting. Journal of geriatric oncology. 2016;7(4):293–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Irwin M, Cartmel B, Gross C, et al. Randomized trial of exercise vs. usual care on aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgias in women with breast cancer: The hormones and physical exercise (HOPE) study. 2013;73. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Burbury K, Wong Z, Yip D, et al. Telehealth in cancer care: during and beyond the COVID‐19 pandemic. Intern Med J. 2021;51(1):125–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Newton RU, Hart NH, Clay T. Keeping Patients With Cancer Exercising in the Age of COVID-19. JCO Oncology Practice. 2020:OP.20.00210. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mohile S, Dumontier C, Mian H, et al. Perspectives from the Cancer and Aging Research Group: Caring for the vulnerable older patient with cancer and their caregivers during the COVID-19 crisis in the United States. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(5):753–760. doi: S1879-4068(20)30210-1 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
