Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health problem. Among its modes of transmission, vertical transmission from mother to child during pregnancy is exceedingly important. This study investigated seropositivity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) among pregnant women aged 16–49 years and their pregnancy outcomes in several health institutions (university and state hospitals, family health centers) from seven cities in Turkey.
METHODS:
An Excel form was sent to the sites participating in the study, and the total number of pregnant women who were tested for HBsAg between 2010 and 2017, HBsAg positivity rates, and the ages of HBsAg-positive pregnant women was collected retrospectively. Serum samples were obtained from 204,865 pregnant women from four regions between 2010 and 2017, including 107,463 from Black Sea, 2306 from Marmara, 48,339 from East Anatolia, and 46,757 from Aegean. HBsAg levels were determined on automated devices using chemiluminescence.
RESULTS:
In the study, the data of 204,865 pregnant women from seven different provinces (Afyonkarahisar, Erzurum, Istanbul, Izmir, Manisa, Mus, and Rize) in different geographical regions were accessed, and HBsAg positivity was found in 2343 pregnant women (1.14%). The highest HBsAg seroprevalence was found in women who were older 26–40 years/1977–1991 birth year range on average. In the data of the present study, the number of pregnant women with HBsAg positivity among pregnant women born after the initiation of the national vaccination program and catch-up vaccination program is only 124 and constitutes 5.3% of all HBsAg-positive pregnant women
CONCLUSION:
In this study, it has been found that HBsAg positivity in pregnant women has been decreasing in Turkey and that it is significantly lower, especially in those born after the initiation of the national vaccination program. Continuation of national neonatal HBV vaccination with high compliance is very important.
Keywords: HBsAg, pregnancy, seropositivity
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a microorganism that causes acute and chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [1]. Despite having an effective and safe vaccine, approximately 257 million people around the world are diagnosed with the disease, and nearly 600,000 people/year lose their lives due to acute or chronic HBV infection, indicating the importance of this microorganism [2]. The possibility of infection with HBV becoming chronic is inversely proportional to the age the virus is acquired [3, 4]. An important source of the spread of HBV is women in the reproductive age group with chronic HBV infection.
Many international organizations (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, World Health Organization) recommend that all pregnant women be tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Even though vaccine + immune globin has been administered to the infant against HBV for many years, perinatal transmission occurs in at least in 10% of children born to mothers with high levels of viremia [5, 6]. For this reason, oral antiviral use in the last trimester has been recommended in some pregnant women in recent years [7, 8].
This study aimed to determine the current status HBsAg seropositivity in pregnant women in different regions in our country, which is important to know for the management of HBV infection during pregnancy and prevention of vertical transmission.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
In this multicenter study, records of 204,865 pregnant women aged of 16–49 years who applied to state health institutions and who were living in urban and rural parts of seven cities (Afyonkarahisar, Erzurum, Istanbul, Izmir, Manisa, Muş, and Rize) in different regions of Turkey between 2010 and 2017 (the first 4 months of 2017) were retrospectively reviewed. Serum samples were obtained from 204,865 pregnant women from four regions between 2010 and 2017, including 107,463 from Black Sea, 2306 from Marmara, 48,339 from East Anatolia, and 46,757 from Aegean. In order not to use repetitive data of pregnant women, only a single HBsAg result of each pregnant woman with HBsAg positivity was taken into evaluation. The provinces that participated in the study and the number of pregnant women who were tested for HBsAg were as follows in alphabetical order: Afyonkarahisar 4725, Erzurum 36,123, İstanbul 2306, İzmir 6038, Manisa 35,994, Muş 12,216, and Rize 107,463.
Highlight key points
Monitoring of seropositivity rates for HBsAg very important among pregnant women.
Thanks to national HBV vaccination program, HBsAg positivity in pregnant women has been decreasing in Turkey.
Preventing vertical transmission is very important.
Immunochemistry
Tests were performed in each hospital’s own microbiology laboratory, and each hospital identified HBsAg-positive cases according to the reference intervals of its own laboratory. These data were collected retrospectively.
Ethics
Before collecting data, ethics committee approval for this multicenter study was obtained from the Non-interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital (2016/430) and the Ministry of Public Health Institution of Turkey.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of all data was performed using the JASP (open-source statistic program) program. Results are presented as percentage and number for categorical variables and mean±standard deviation or median (minimum [min]-maximum [max]) for continuous variables. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were utilized for the comparison of group rates. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Among the 204,865 pregnant women tested, 2343 (1.14%) were HBsAg positive (Table 1). HBsAg positivity rates by years are shown in Table 1, and there was no statistically significant difference between the years.
TABLE 1.
Year | HBsAg positive n (%) | Total n |
---|---|---|
2010 | 287 (1.16) | 24593 |
2011 | 84 (0.61) | 13645 |
2012 | 407 (1.34) | 30357 |
2013 | 347 (1.29) | 26860 |
2014 | 343 (1.01) | 33728 |
2015 | 273 (0.90) | 30120 |
2016 | 479 (1.27) | 37429 |
2017* | 123 (1.51) | 8133 |
Total | 2343 (1.14) | 204.865 |
:The first 4 months; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Distribution of pregnant women with HBsAg positivity by their years of birth is shown in Table 2. The results have been given with reference to years of birth. When the distribution by age groups was analyzed, the lowest rate was found in the period after the initiation of the national HBV vaccination in Turkey (p<0.05). It has been determined that HBsAg positivity increases with age (p<0.05). The highest HBsAg seroprevalence was found in women who were older 26–40 years/1977–1991 birth year range on average.
TABLE 2.
Age groups (by years) | Age groups (by ages) | % n=2343 |
---|---|---|
2000–1997 | 17–20 | 5.30 |
1996–1992 | 21–25 | 16.81 |
1991–1987 | 26–30 | 22.40 |
1986–1982 | 31–35 | 26.70 |
1981–1977 | 36–40 | 18.43 |
1976–1972 | 41–45 | 8.20 |
1971 and before | 46+ | 2.20 |
HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Distribution of pregnant women with HBsAg positivity by provinces (geographical regions) is shown in Table 3. There was a marked difference in seroprevalence by region, ranging from 0.6% (Rize) to 2.4% (Mus). Aegean and Marmara regions which are regions west of the Turkey and low HBsAg positivity. East Anatolia region of Turkey is located east of the country and HBsAg positivity is high. Black Sea region has mild endemicity for HBsAg. It has been observed that the number of HBsAg-positive pregnant women is higher in the province of Muş located in the East Anatolia region, followed by Manisa, which is located in the west but is a province that receives migration from East and Southeast provinces.
TABLE 3.
Provinces | Geographic area | HBsAg-positive pregnant women (n=2343) |
Total number (n=204,865) |
% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Afyon | Aegean | 71 | 4725 | 1.5 |
Erzurum | East Anatolia | 481 | 36,123 | 1.3 |
Istanbul | Marmara | 37 | 2306 | 1.6 |
Izmir | Aegean | 103 | 6038 | 1.7 |
Manisa | Aegean | 692 | 35,994 | 1.9 |
Mus | East Anatolia | 304 | 12,216 | 2.4 |
Rize | Black sea | 655 | 107,463 | 0.6 |
HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
DISCUSSION
HBV infection can be prevented by safe and effective vaccine [9]. Hepatitis B vaccine prevents HBV infection in both children and adults. In infants, the hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin have been shown to be 90–95% effective in preventing perinatal HBV infection if it is administered within 24 h of birth followed by at least two more doses [10, 11]. Yet, in 2014, <38% of the newborns in the world had HBV vaccine administered within 24 h after birth [12].
Given the danger of vertical transmission to a baby from a mother who is HBsAg positive, evaluating HBV status in pregnant women is critically important [7, 8, 13]. Before the implementation of vaccination programs, the prevalence of HBsAg among adults was below 2% in Europe and North America, whereas it was 15–20% in most Asian and European countries [14]. It was reported that the transmission route of new infections was parenteral and sexual in Europe and North America, however, it was known that transmission from infected mother to the baby continued in the hyperendemic regions [15]. Maternal screening for HBV and implementation of anti-transmission programs to reduce maternal transmission and the population of HBV carriers are, therefore, very important in hyperendemic areas. Results of national immunoprophylactic vaccine applications for HBV have been positive worldwide. HBV infection in Taiwan was hyperendemic until the 1990s. In Taiwan, where universal vaccination in childhood practices was carried out meticulously, before universal HBV vaccination was initiated in 1984, the carrier rate for HBsAg was 15–20% in the general population [16].
In a study from Taiwan evaluating the effectiveness of its vaccination program, the chronic HBV infection rate was lowered from 10% to 1% among children over 10 years by testing pregnant women and immunizing newborns [17]. In the same population, the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma in children 6–14 years old was reduced from 0.7–0.36/100,000 [18].
Turkey is considered an intermediate endemic area for HBV by the World Health Organization [14, 19]. Seroprevalence of HBsAg was found to be 4% in the studies conducted on the general population in Turkey and it was reported that this rate varies between the regions and that the prevalence of HBV increases from the west to the east [20]. Epidemiologic studies conducted in the past two decades reveal a rate of HBsAg seropositivity among the general Turkish population between 4% and 5%. However, there are regional differences in the prevalence [20–22]. The TURHEP study reported HBsAg seropositivity of 4% in the general population, 2.3% in the Aegean region, 6.1% in the Black Sea region, 4.3% in Central Anatolia, 3.4% in East Anatolia, 3.8% in the Marmara region, 3.1% in the Mediterranean region, and 7.3% in Southeast Anatolia [22].
HBsAg positivity in pregnant women in Turkey in the years 1987–2004 was reported to be between 3.5% and 9.3% [23]. In a review of studies covering pregnant women in Turkey, a total of 64 studies conducted between 1975 and 2016 were reviewed. In these studies, HBsAg positivity rates in pregnant women were found to be between 1.2% and 19.2%, and it was emphasized that HBsAg positivity had decreased in recent years [20, 24].
A study retrospectively examined the test results of pregnant women who presented to the University Hospital between 2012 and 2014 in Zonguldak, a province in the Black Sea Region, and found an HBsAg positivity rate of 4% and an anti-HBs positivity rate of 7.3% in a total of 1084 pregnant women with a mean age of 29 years [25].
In another retrospective study conducted in Turkey, the rates of HBsAg and anti-HBs in pregnant women who were monitored at four centers between 1995 and 2015 were examined. When the results were evaluated, HBsAg positivity was found to be 1.5%, and anti-HBs positivity was found to be 11.5% [26].
When the change in these results by years was examined, HBsAg positivity was 2.6% (n=3010) between 1995 and 2001, 0.8% (n=2995) between 2002 and 2008, and 0.8% (n=1600) between 2009 and 2015, while anti-HBs positivity rates were 9.5%, 10.3%, and 17.5%, respectively. Furthermore, in the present study, it has been found that HBsAg positivity has decreased in pregnant women over the years.
In this study, when the age distribution of 2343 HBsAg-positive pregnant women was examined, it was found that the highest rate of HBsAg positivity was between 26–35 and 36–40 age groups.
All newborn babies in Turkey since 1998 have been vaccinated at birth, with subsequent injections according to the standard schedule as a part of National Immunization Programme. Then, by applying National catch-up HBV vaccination program, adolescent vaccination was performed and those born in 1996 and before were vaccinated with three doses.
According to the Ministry of Health, the incidence of hepatitis B infection in 2002 was 8.26/100,000 persons, but it had dropped to 4.26 in 2010 [27]. In an article evaluating the universal HBV vaccination program in Turkey, it was emphasized that there was a significant decrease in the number of HBV infections, especially under the age of 15 in the period between 1990 and 2012 as a result of the prevention and protection strategies [28]. In the data of the present study, the number of pregnant women with HBsAg positivity among pregnant women born after the initiation of the national vaccination program and catch-up vaccination program is only 124 and constitutes 5.3% of all HBsAg-positive pregnant women. The number and rate of HBsAg-positive pregnant women increase with age, and low rates at the age of 41 and above are considered to be related to the low number of pregnant women in that age group. When the distribution by geographical regions was examined, it was found that HBsAg positivity was high (2.4%) in pregnant women in the province of Muş in the East Anatolia region, a region where HBsAg positivity is high. This is followed by the province of Manisa with a rate of 1.9%. Although the province of Manisa is located in the west of Turkey, it is a province that receives intense migration from regions where HBV infection is endemic, such as the East and Southeast Anatolia regions, due to the high number of industrial workplaces, and this may be associated with the high result [29].
Limitations of the Study
Since the study was conducted retrospectively and on a voluntary basis, participation from all geographical regions of Turkey could not be achieved. In addition, as it is difficult to access retrospective data, only a single result of the pregnant women who were found to have HBsAg positivity was evaluated in order not to use repetitive data of the same pregnant women and to avoid bias related to this issue. Therefore, since the data of HBsAg-negative pregnant women could not be accessed for every age group, the percentage within each age group could not be calculated. However, we believe that the data of the present study would be significant since there were participants from different provinces in Turkey, and a high number of cases in a recent period of 7 years were included in the study.
The rates of HBsAg testing in pregnant women are lower throughout Turkey since there was no legal obligation for testing until last year. However, we believe that awareness on this issue and therefore rates of HBsAg testing during pregnancy will increase through the “Turkey Viral Hepatitis Prevention and Control Program (2018–2023)” that was put into force in October 2018 [30].
As a result, testing for HBsAg seropositivity is important in the general population, as failing to identify those who are chronically infected may mean that they have no opportunity to be treated before they develop chronic hepatitis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, seropositivity in pregnant women poses a risk not only for themselves but also for their babies. Therefore, health services should be accessible and regularly provided so that pregnant women in all areas of the country are appropriately tested and followed. It is important to include the foreign immigrant population in testing schemes.
Conclusion
In this study, we have found that HBsAg positivity in pregnant women has been decreasing gradually and that it has been significantly lower, especially in those born after the initiation of the national vaccination program in Turkey. We believe that our study provides useful data about the current epidemiology of hepatitis B infection in pregnant women in Turkey that will be of use in health planning. We would like to emphasize once again that it is very important to continue with the national neonatal HBV vaccination program with high compliance and to test for HBsAg in all pregnant women for the continuation of this achievement.
Footnotes
Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval for multi-centered study was taken from Non-interventional Clinical Research Ethic Committee of Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University (2016/430) and Public Health Institution of Turkey.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
Authorship Contributions: Concept – ST; Design – FBB, ST; Supervision – FBB, ST; Fundings – FBB, ST, IEY, HA, ANE, HHK, ZSC, RK, SBA, BA; Materials – FBB, ST, IEY, HA, ANE, HHK, ZSC, RK, SBA, BA; Data collection and/or processing – FBB, ST, IEY, HA, ANE, HHK, ZSC, RK, SBA, BA; Analysis and/or interpretation – FBB, ST; Literature review – FBB, ST; Writing – FBB, ST; Critical review – FBB, ST.
REFERENCES
- 1.Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection:a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61412-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. Hepatitis B vaccines:WHO position paper, July 2017 - Recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37:223–5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stanaway JD, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C, Vos T, Abubakar I, et al. The global burden of viral hepatitis from 1990 to 2013:findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2016;388:1081–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30579-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McMahon BJ, Alward WL, Hall DB, Heyward WL, Bender TR, Francis DP, et al. Acute hepatitis B virus infection:relation of age to the clinical expression of disease and subsequent development of the carrier state. J Infect Dis. 1985;151:599–603. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aslam A, Campoverde Reyes KJ, Malladi VR, Ishtiaq R, Lau DTY. Management of chronic hepatitis B during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2018;6:257–62. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aktuğ-Demir N, Asan A, Ayaz C, Çelen MK, Köse Ş, et al. Management of chronic hepatitis B in pregnancy:a consensus report of the study group for viral hepatitis of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Klimik Journal. 2013;26:12–9. [Google Scholar]
- 7.European Association for the study of the liver (EASL) 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. [Accessed Apr 17, 2020]. Available at: https://easl.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/HepB-English-report.pdf . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Anderson S, Harper LM, Dionne-Odom J, Halle-Ekane G, Tita ATN. A decision analytic model for prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in Sub-Saharan Africa using birth-dose vaccination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141:126–32. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.The Immunological basis for immunization series - Module 22:Hepatitis B. [Accessed Jan 15, 2019]. Available at: https://www.who.int/immunization/documents/ISBN_978_92_4_150475_1/en/
- 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) Perinatal transmission. [Accessed Jan 16, 2019]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hbv/perinatalxmtn.html .
- 11.Schillie S, Vellozzi C, Reingold A, Harris A, Haber P, Ward JW, et al. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States:recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018;67:1–31. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6701a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.WHO vaccine-preventable diseases:monitoring system. 2018 global summary. [Accessed Jan 21, 2019]. http: //apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary .
- 13.Karaca N, Karaca Ç. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV. In: Ozaras R, Tahan V, editors. Viral hepatitis:chronic hepatitis B. Springer, Cham: 2018. pp. 65–70. [Google Scholar]
- 14.World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021. [Accessed Apr 17, 2020]. http: //www.who.int/hepatitis/strategy2016-2021/ghss-hep/en/
- 15.Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Wiersma ST. The risk of perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission:hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) prevalence estimates for all world regions. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Su WJ, Chen SF, Yang CH, Chuang PH, Chang HF, Chang MH. The impact of universal infant hepatitis B immunization on reducing the hepatitis B carrier rate in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:1118–26. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen HL, Chang MH, Ni YH, Hsu HY, Lee PI, Lee CY, et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in children:Ten years of mass vaccination in Taiwan. JAMA. 1996;276:906–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chang MH, Chen CJ, Lai MS, Hsu HM, Wu TC, Kong MS, et al. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in Taiwan and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in children. Taiwan Childhood Hepatoma Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1855–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706263362602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.World Health Organization. Global policy report on the prevention and control of viral hepatitis - in WHO member states. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Accessed Mar 23, 2021]. Available at: https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global_report/en/ [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tosun S. Dünyada ve Türkiye'de viral hepatit B epidemiyolojisi. In: Rahmet Güner, Tabak F., editors. Viral Hepatit 2018. Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Sağlık ve Yayıncılık; 2018. pp. 13–48. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tabak F, Yurdaydın C, Kaymakoğlu S, Akarsu M, Akıncı EG, Akkız H, et al. Guidelines Study Group VH. Diagnosis, management and treatment of hepatitis B virus infection:Turkey 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28:73–83. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tozun N, Ozdogan O, Cakaloglu Y, Idilman R, Karasu Z, Akarca U, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections and risk factors in Turkey:a fieldwork TURHEP study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:1020–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mıstık R. Türkiye'de viral hepatit epidemiyolojisi - Yayınların irdelenmesi. In: Tabak F, Balık İ, Tekeli E, editors. Viral Hepatit. Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık; 2007. pp. 9–50. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bakar RZ, Dane B. Gebelerde hepatit B seropozitifliği ve Türk literatürüne bir bakış. Perinatal Journal. 2016;24:83–8. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aynıoglu A, Aynıoglu O, Akar T, Aydın M, Altunok ES. HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HCV seropositivity rates among pregnant women attending a university hospital in Zonguldak. Viral Hepat J. 2015;21:31–4. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Furuncuoglu Y, Bolukbas FF, Bolukbas C, Torun P, Ozturk R. Changes in the prevalence of HBV infection in pregnant women in Turkey between 1995 and 2015:a 20-year evaluation. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92:510–3. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.The Ministry of Health of Turkey. Health Statistics Yearbook. 2010. [Accessed Jan 31, 2019]. Available at: http://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/ekutuphane/kitaplar/saglikistatistikleriyilligi2010.pdf .
- 28.Ay P, Torunoglu MA, Com S, Çipil Z, Mollahaliloğlu S, Erkoc Y, et al. Trends of hepatitis B notification rates in Turkey, 1990 to 2012. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20636. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2013.18.47.20636. Erratum in:Euro Surveill;2014:18:pii/20653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Temel R. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler EnstitüsüYüksek Lisans Tezi Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Ana Bilim DalıYüksek Lisans Tezi; 2017. [Accessed Mar 25, 2021]. Doğu ve Güneydoğudan göçeden bireylerin yoksulluk ve sosyal dışlanma boyutunda incelenmesi (Manisa ili örneği) Available at: http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11499/1394/Ramazan%20Temel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=n . [Google Scholar]
- 30.Türkiye Viral Hepatit Önleme ve Kontrol Programı(2018-2023) [Accessed Apr 15, 2020]. Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar-db/duyurular/Turkiye_Viral_Hepatit_Onleme_ve_Kontrol_Programi/Turkiye_Viral_Hepatit_Onleme_ve_Kontrol_Programi_TR.pdf .