Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2021 Aug 28;22(17):9322. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179322

Common Genetic Aberrations Associated with Metabolic Interferences in Human Type-2 Diabetes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Bioinformatics Approach

Theodora-Christina Kyriakou 1, Panagiotis Papageorgis 1,2, Maria-Ioanna Christodoulou 3,*
Editor: Michael Voulgarelis
PMCID: PMC8431701  PMID: 34502231

Abstract

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder, associated with an increased risk of developing solid tumors and hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the genetic background underlying this predisposition remains elusive. We herein aimed at the exploration of the genetic variants, related transcriptomic changes and disturbances in metabolic pathways shared by T2D and AML, utilizing bioinformatics tools and repositories, as well as publicly available clinical datasets. Our approach revealed that rs11709077 and rs1801282, on PPARG, rs11108094 on USP44, rs6685701 on RPS6KA1 and rs7929543 on AC118942.1 comprise common SNPs susceptible to the two diseases and, together with 64 other co-inherited proxy SNPs, may affect the expression patterns of metabolic genes, such as USP44, METAP2, PPARG, TIMP4 and RPS6KA1, in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas and whole blood. Most importantly, a set of 86 AML/T2D common susceptibility genes was found to be significantly associated with metabolic cellular processes, including purine, pyrimidine, and choline metabolism, as well as insulin, AMPK, mTOR and PI3K signaling. Moreover, it was revealed that the whole blood of AML patients exhibits deregulated expression of certain T2D-related genes. Our findings support the existence of common metabolic perturbations in AML and T2D that may account for the increased risk for AML in T2D patients. Future studies may focus on the elucidation of these pathogenetic mechanisms in AML/T2D patients, as well as on the assessment of certain susceptibility variants and genes as potential biomarkers for AML development in the setting of T2D. Detection of shared therapeutic molecular targets may enforce the need for repurposing metabolic drugs in the therapeutic management of AML.

Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia (AML), type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), metabolic pathways, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

1. Introduction

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder, nowadays considered a global epidemic, with ever-increasing prevalence and high cardiovascular mortality rates [1]. Metabolic disturbances in T2D are associated with chronic hyperglycemia due to deficient insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells and decreased insulin sensitivity in the skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue [2]. During the last two decades, 85 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed 1894 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 1294 genes involved in the aforementioned processes [3]. Interestingly, it was recently shown that certain T2D susceptibility genes exhibit deregulated mRNA expression in the peripheral blood of patients and predisposed individuals, possibly mirroring the aberrant regulation in disease-target organs [4].

T2D also has been associated with the development of various types of human neoplasia, including both solid tumors and hematological malignancies [5]. A recent study on 804,100 new cancer patients bearing different tumor types reported that 5.7% of their development was attributable to diabetes and high body mass index (BMI) [6]. Moreover, observational and Mendelian randomization studies support a strong epidemiological link between T2D and cancer [7]. Common pathophysiological background includes: (a) risk factors such as aging, obesity and physical inactivity; (b) biological processes including hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and chronic low-grade inflammation and (c) molecular pathways such as the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and interleukin (IL)-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) axes [5]. Importantly, the first-line anti-diabetic drug metformin is known to lower the risk of cancer development in T2D patients and improve the response to anti-cancer therapies in diabetic or non-diabetic individuals bearing certain tumor types [8]. At the cellular level, the drug exerts its anti-cancer function by interfering with mitochondrial respiration and activating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway [8]. At the systemic level, metformin suppresses insulin/IGF-1 and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathways, downregulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines and augments CD8+ T cell anti-tumor responses [8].

Among hematological malignancies, acute and chronic leukemias have been associated with a previous history of T2D. A recent meta-analysis of 18 studies involving 10516 leukemia cases within a total of more than 4 million individuals with diabetes showed that the risk for the disease is increased in patients with T2D but not in patients with type 1 diabetes [9]. Especially for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a life-threatening hematological malignancy with critical survival rates [10], it has been described that the standard incidence ratio in a cohort of 641 T2D individuals is 1.36 (95% CI: 1.26–1.47), significantly higher than in the general population [11]. Furthermore, various studies have detected BMI as an independent adverse prognostic factor for AML [12,13,14], which aggravates the relative risk for the disease in T2D [9,15]. Additionally, metformin has been associated with improved outcomes also in patients with leukemias [16]. On the other hand, in vitro studies have described that AML cells exhibit a hyper-metabolic phenotype that involves upregulations in basal and maximal respiration [17] and perturbations in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation processes [18,19]. These clinical and in vitro data suggest that repurposing metformin could possibly modify leukemic cells’ metabolism, indicating a promising option for the management of AML [16].

Despite the identified epidemiological association of AML with T2D, the genetic and molecular links between the two disorders remain unclear. The possible existence of common metabolic interferences that may underlie the development and perpetuation of the disease has not yet been investigated. Neither is it known whether these are attributed to aberrations in the genomic, transcriptional, or post-transcriptional level. To this end, we herein investigated a network of common genetic alterations (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) and co-inherited variants, related mRNA deviations and pathway deregulations in the two conditions, utilizing appropriate bioinformatic tools and publicly available clinical datasets. Priority was given to the identification of gene sets and pathways associated with possible metabolic disturbances, perchance known to be related to T2D, that may control the development of AML. To the best of our knowledge, our results provide the first information regarding common genetic predisposition and connected mechanisms that may lead to the development of AML in the setting of T2D.

2. Results

2.1. Common Susceptibility SNPs in AML and T2D

Data on all SNPs associated with AML or T2D development were downloaded from the NHGRI-EBI Catalog (Supplementary Table S1). The numbers of SNPs listed and further processed were 5321 for AML and 1894 for T2D, as depicted in Figure 1A. Of these, five SNPs (rs11108094, rs1801282, rs7929543, rs11709077, rs6685701) were found to be linked with the development of both AML and T2D. All of them exerted a p-value for the association with either disease of <5 × 10−8, which was set as a threshold of significance. These five SNPs were included in the subsequent analyses of this study as significantly associated with both AML and T2D. Corresponding information on these SNPs is summarized in Table 1. In addition, information regarding their frequency in the general population is reported in Supplementary Figure S1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Common SNPs between AML and T2D and their impact on gene expression in disease-associated tissues. (A) Venn diagrams reporting the number of common and specific SNPs significantly associated with AML or T2D, based on data downloaded from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. (B) Violin plots depicting the impact of the five common SNPs on the expression levels of associated or other genes, in disease-associated tissues (subcutaneous or visceral adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas, whole blood) (GTex portal, May 2021). NES: normalized effect size.

Table 1.

Information about the five common SNPs associated with both AML and T2D, as obtained upon search in the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (May 2021) [3]. Variant ID, chromosomal location, cytogenetic region, mapped genes, risk alleles, p-values detected in each study, study accession numbers and the corresponding traits are reported.

SNP Chromosomal Location Cytogenetic Region Mapped Gene Risk Allele p-Value Study Accession Number Trait
rs11709077 3:12295008 3p25.2 PPARG G 2 × 10−36 GCST009379 T2D
1 × 10−8 GCST005047
A 5 × 10−11 GCST008413 AML
rs1801282 3:12351626 3p25.2 PPARG C 3 × 10−19 GCST007516 T2D
1 × 10−17 GCST007515
1 × 10−12 GCST005047
5 × 10−12 GCST007517
G 2 × 10−14 GCST004894
2 × 10−19 GCST004894
5 × 10−11 GCST008413 AML
rs6685701 1:26542148 1p36.11 RPS6KA1 G 6 × 10−18 GCST008413 T2D
1 × 10−8 GCST010555
A 1 × 10−10 GCST008413 AML
rs11108094 12:95534337 12q22 USP44 C 1 × 10−10 GCST010557 T2D
1 × 10−10 GCST010555
2 × 10−10 GCST008413 AML
rs7929543 11:49329474 11p11.12 AC118942.1 C 2 × 10−9 GCST006867 T2D
A 7 × 10−9 GCST008413 AML
6 × 10−6 GCST008413

Two of these SNPs (rs11709077, rs1801282) lie in the PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) gene, exerting the following p-values: for rs11709077 5 × 10−11 for AML and 2 × 10−36 for T2D, and for rs1801282 5 × 10−11 for AML and 2 × 10−19 for T2D. Another common SNP, the rs6685701, is found in the gene encoding for the ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1 (RPS6KA1) and exhibits a significant association with AML (p = 6 × 10−18) and T2D (p = 1 × 10−08). USP44 (Ubiquitin Specific Peptidase 44) also bears an SNP (rs11108094) significantly related to both AML and T2D development (p = 2 × 10−10 and 6 × 10−10, respectively). Last, rs7929543, located in AC118942.1 (NADPH oxidase 4 pseudogene), is also significantly associated with both AML (p = 7 × 10−09) and T2D (p = 2 × 10−09). It is important to note that all SNPs are in non-coding regions except SNP rs1801282 which is a missense variant in PPARG, also known as Pro12Ala. The more common C allele encodes for the Pro amino acid at the SNP position [20].

To investigate whether these genetic variants affect the expression levels of associated or other genes in disease-related tissues (adipose, skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas, whole blood), we searched for eQTLs through the GTex and Blood eQTL Browser databases [21,22]. All results obtained are reported in Table 2. Moreover, graphical data from the GTex portal are shown in Figure 1B; corresponding data from Blood eQTL Browser were not available. Rs11709077 (allele: G/A; minor allele: A) and rs1801282 (G/C; minor: G), on the PPARG gene, were found to affect the mRNA expression levels of SYN2 (synapsin II) in the skeletal muscle (Figure 1B and Table 2) and whole blood (Table 2). In the skeletal muscle, the presence of the minor alleles correlates with increased SYN2 expression (normalized effect size (NES): 0.35 and 0.36 for rs11709077 and rs1801282, respectively) (Figure 1B and Table 2), whereas in the whole blood, they are correlated with decreased levels (z-score: −3.61, for both) (Table 2). In addition, rs1801282 was found to negatively impact the expression of the GATA3 transcription factor in whole blood (z-score = −4.54) (Table 2) and of TIMP4 (TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 4) (NES = −0.21) in visceral adipose tissue (Figure 1B and Table 2). The rs11108094 variant (C/A; minor allele: A) on USP44 was associated with decreased expression of METAP2 (methionine aminopeptidase 2) in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (NES: −0.64 and −0.55, respectively) (Figure 1B and Table 2). Finally, in visceral adipose tissue, rs6685701 (A/G; minor allele: G) in RPS6KA1 negatively affects its own expression levels (NES: −0.099), while rs7929543 (A/C; minor allele: C) on AC118942.1 is positively associated with the expression levels of RP11-347H15.5 (clone-based (Vega) gene) (NES: 0.53) (Figure 1B and Table 2).

Table 2.

eQTL associated with the five common disease susceptibility SNPs described in AML and/or T2D target tissues, as well as with their 64 proxies, as deposited in the GTEx project and Blood eQTL Browser. The SNP ID, SNP alleles, associated and affected genes and tissue(s), as well as corresponding p-values and the effect sizes, are reported.

SNP Associated Gene SNP Alleles Affected Gene Tissue p-Value Effect Size Database
Five (5) common AML/T2D susceptibility SNPs
rs11108094 USP44 C/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 9.50 × 10−8 NES = −0.64 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.50 × 10− 6 NES = −0.55 GTEx project
rs11709077 PPARG G/A SYN2 Whole blood 3.09 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.61 Blood eQTL Browser
Skeletal muscle 5.90 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
rs1801282 PPARG G/C GATA3 Whole blood 5.70 × 10−6 Z-score = −4.54 Blood eQTL browser
SYN2 Whole blood 3.09 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.61 Blood eQTL browser
Skeletal muscle 2.10 × 10−8 NES = 0.36 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 5.90 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
rs6685701 RPS6KA1 A/G RPS6KA1 Visceral adipose 1.10 × 10−4 NES = −0.099 GTEx project
rs7929543 AC118942.1 A/C RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 9.10 × 10−8 NES = 0.53 GTEx project
Sixty-four (64) proxies of the five common AML/T2D susceptibility SNPs
rs10839264 FOLH1, AC118942.1 C/T RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 7.90 × 10−8 NES = 0.51 GTex project
rs10859889 USP44, METAP2 A/T METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11040352 FOLH1, AC118942.1 A/C RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 5.10 × 10−13 NES = 0.69 GTex project
rs11040365 FOLH1, AC118942.1 C/A RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 1.40 × 10−11 NES = 0.65 GTex project
rs11108070 USP44 T/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11108072 USP44, METAP2 T/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11108076 USP44, METAP2 G/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11108079 USP44, METAP2 G/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−8 NES = −0.54
rs11108086 USP44 T/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 1.60 × 10−6 NES = −0.56
rs11108087 USP44 A/G METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 9.50 × 10−8 NES = −0.64 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 1.70 × 10−6 NES = −0.56
rs11519597 USP44, METAP2 T/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11522874 USP44, METAP2 G/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs11580180 RPS6KA1 A/G RPS6KA1 Visceral adipose 1.40 × 10−4 NES = 0.098 GTEx project
rs11603576 FOLH1, AC118942.1 G/A RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 9.10 × 10−8 NES = 0.53 GTEx project
rs11607791 FOLH1, AC118942.1 T/C RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 7.90 × 10−8 NES = 0.51 GTEx project
rs11709077 PPARG G/A SYN2 Whole blood 3.09 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.61 Blood eQTL Browser
Skeletal muscle 4.60 × 10−9 NES = 0.35 GTEx project
rs11712037 PPARG, TIMP4 C/G TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.30 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
Skeletal muscle 2.20 × 10−9 NES = 0.35
rs12146719 USP44, METAP2 C/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs12369757 USP44 G/A METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs13064760 PPARG T/C SYN2 Whole blood 2.55 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.66 Blood eQTL Browser
Skeletal muscle 4.10 × 10−9 NES = 0.35 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
rs13083375 PPARG G/T SYN2 Skeletal muscle 4.10 × 10−9 NES = 0.35 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21
rs143400372 USP44 G/GA METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 9.50 × 10−8 NES = −0.64 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.50 × 10−6 NES = −0.55
rs150732434 PPARG, TIMP4 TG/T TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
SYN2 Skeletal muscle 4.10 × 10−9 NES = 0.35
rs17036160 PPARG, TIMP4 C/T TIMP4 Visceral adipose 8.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
SYN2 Skeletal muscle 6.50 × 10−9 NES = 0.34
rs1801282 PPARG G/C GATA3 Whole blood 5.70 × 10−6 Z-score = −4.54 Blood eQTL Browser
SYN2 Whole blood 3.09 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.61 Blood eQTL Browser
Skeletal muscle 2.10 × 10−8 NES = 0.36 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 5.90 × 10−5 NES = −0.21
rs1843628 FOLH1, AC118942.1 A/G RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 3.40 × 10−9 NES = −0.55 GTEx project
rs1880436 FOLH1, AC118942.1 A/G RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 2.70 × 10−9 NES = 0.55 GTEx project
rs2012444 PPARG C/T SYN2 Skeletal muscle 4.10 × 10−9 NES = 0.35 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21
rs2278978 RPS6KA1 G/A RPS6KA1 Whole blood 1.96 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.72 Blood eQTL Browser
DHDDS Whole blood 2.41 × 10−3 Z-score = −3.03 Blood eQTL Browser
rs2305293 USP44, METAP2 C/T METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs35000407 PPARG, TIMP4 T/G TIMP4 Visceral adipose 7.50 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
SYN2 Skeletal muscle 4.60 × 10−9 NES = 0.35
rs35788455 PPARG CTTG/C SYN2 Skeletal muscle 1.80 × 10−9 NES = 0.36 GTEx project
TIMP4 Visceral adipose 8.20 × 10−5 NES = −0.21
rs4443935 RPS6KA1 G/A RPS6KA1 Whole blood 2.45 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.67 Blood eQTL Browser
rs4684847 USP44, METAP2 C/T TIMP4 Visceral adipose 8.20 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
SYN2 Skeletal muscle 1.80 × 10−9 NES = 0.36
rs4762563 USP44, METAP2 G/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs61939476 USP44, METAP2 A/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 x 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs61939479 USP44, METAP2 C/T METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 1.60 × 10−6 NES = −0.54
rs61939481 USP44 T/C METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 9.50 × 10−8 NES = −0.64 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 6.40 × 10−6 NES = −0.52
rs71304101 PPARG, TIMP4 G/A TIMP4 Visceral adipose 5.80 × 10−5 NES = −0.21 GTEx project
SYN2 Skeletal muscle 9.30 × 10−10 NES = 0.36
rs737465 RPS6KA1 C/T DHDDS Whole blood 1.88 x 10−3 Z-score = −3.11 Blood eQTL Browser
RPS6KA1 Whole blood 2.04 × 10−4 Z-score = −3.71 Blood eQTL Browser
Visceral adipose 1.40 × 10−4 NES = 0.098 GTex project
rs75781920 FOLH1, AC118942.1 T/G RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 2.70 × 10−9 NES = 0.55 GTex project
rs76218798 FOLH1, AC118942.1 T/C RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 7.90 × 10−8 NES = 0.51 GTex project
rs76427006 FOLH1, AC118942.1 T/A RP11-347H15.5 Visceral adipose 2.70 × 10−9 NES = 0.55 GTex project
rs79067108 USP44 GCT/G METAP2 Subcutaneous adipose 5.20 × 10−8 NES = −0.65 GTEx project
Visceral adipose 2.30 × 10−6 NES = −0.54

2.2. Proxy SNPs of the Five Common AML/T2D Susceptibility SNPs

Apart from the SNPs directly identified to be associated with a disease, other co-inherited SNPs may also lead to its development [23]. Based on this, we searched for the proxy SNPs of the five common AML/T2D susceptibility SNPs, utilizing the LDLink tool [24]. The selection criterion for a proxy SNP was to possess a squared correlation measure (R2) of LD greater than 0.8. Data are shown in Figure 2 and Table 3. Sixty-six (66) unique proxy SNPs that lie in the USP44, METAP2, PPARG, TIMP4, FOLH1 (folate hydrolase 1), AC118942.1 and RPS6KA1 genes were identified; some of them were detected as proxies for more than one of the five common SNPs. Through this analysis, it was also revealed that two of the common AML/T2D susceptibility genes (rs1801282, rs11709077) on the PPARG gene were mutual proxy SNPs (Table 3; bold/italics highlighted). Moreover, Venn diagram analysis revealed that one of the 64 SNPs (rs11519597) is an AML-specific disease susceptibility SNP, while two of them (rs71304101, rs17036160) are T2D-specific disease susceptibility SNPs (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Regional LD plots of five commonly associated SNPs generated using the LDLink web tool (May 2021). Each dot represents the pairwise LD level between two individual SNPs. X-axis depicts the chromosomal coordinates. Left y-axis represents the pairwise R2 value with the query variant; R2 threshold greater than or equal to 0.8 was considered as a cut-off for selected proxies (blue dashed line). Right y-axis indicates the combined recombination rate (cM/Mb) from HapMap. Recombination rate is the rate at which the association between the two loci is changed. It combines the genetic (cM) and physical positions (Mb) of the marker by an interactive plot.

Table 3.

Summary of the proxy SNPs (R2 ≥ 0.8) for each common AML/T2D susceptibility SNP, along with their chromosomal location, correlated alleles and associated genes, as collected from LDLink tool [24] (May 2021).

Proxy SNPs Chr Position Alleles R2 Correlated Alleles Associated Genes
rs11709077 rs17036160 3 12329783 (C/T) 0.9844 G = C,A = T PPARG
rs2012444 3 12375956 (C/T) 0.9751 G = C,A = T
rs13064760 3 12369401 (C/T) 0.9751 G = C,A = T
rs150732434 3 12360884 (G/-) 0.9751 G = G,A = -
rs13083375 3 12365308 (G/T) 0.972 G = G,A = T
rs35000407 3 12351521 (T/G) 0.9539 G = T,A = G
rs4684847 3 12386337 (C/T) 0.9391 G = C,A = T
rs11712037 3 12344730 (C/G) 0.9379 G = C,A = G
rs35788455 3 12388908 (TTG/-) 0.9362 G = TTG,A = -
rs1801282 3 12393125 (C/G) 0.9334 G = C,A = G
rs71304101 3 12396913 (G/A) 0.9083 G = G,A = A
rs35408322 3 12360357 (-/T) 0.9021 G = -,A = T
rs1801282 rs4684847 3 12386337 (C/T) 0.9939 C = C,G = T PPARG, TIMP4
rs35788455 3 12388908 (TTG/-) 0.9908 C = TTG,G = -
rs71304101 3 12396913 (G/A) 0.9613 C = G,G = A
rs150732434 3 12360884 (G/-) 0.9573 C = G,G = -
rs13064760 3 12369401 (C/T) 0.9573 C = C,G = T
rs2012444 3 12375956 (C/T) 0.9573 C = C,G = T
rs13083375 3 12365308 (G/T) 0.9543 C = G,G = T
rs35000407 3 12351521 (T/G) 0.9365 C = T,G = G
rs11709077 3 12336507 (G/A) 0.9334 C = G,G = A
rs17036160 3 12329783 (C/T) 0.9183 C = C,G = T
rs35408322 3 12360357 (-/T) 0.8855 C = −,G = T
rs11712037 3 12344730 (C/G) 0.8806 C = C,G = G
rs6685701 rs4970486 1 26871669 (C/T) 0.9826 A = C,G = T RPS6KA1
rs737465 1 26862939 (T/C) 0.9814 A = T,G = C
rs11580180 1 26867453 (A/G) 0.9746 A = A,G = G
rs2278978 1 26873245 (A/G) 0.9311 A = A,G = G
rs4443935 1 26875433 (A/G) 0.9072 A = A,G = G
rs10902750 1 26876245 (G/T) 0.9052 A = G,G = T
rs389548 1 26891697 (C/A) 0.8777 A = C,G = A
rs11108094 rs11108087 12 95915763 (A/G) 0.8578 C = A,A = G USP44, METAP2
rs61939481 12 95921998 (T/C) 0.8477 C = T,A = C
rs143400372 12 95923620 (-/A) 0.8477 C = -,A = A
rs11108086 12 95914758 (T/C) 0.8187 C = T,A = C
rs79067108 12 95881761 (CT/-) 0.8141 C = CT,A = -
rs11108070 12 95881787 (T/A) 0.8141 C = T,A = A
rs12369757 12 95888603 (G/A) 0.8141 C = G,A = A
rs11108072 12 95890218 (T/C) 0.8141 C = T,A = C
rs10859889 12 95890413 (A/T) 0.8141 C = A,A = T
rs11522874 12 95893609 (G/A) 0.8141 C = G,A = A
rs61939476 12 95894581 (A/C) 0.8141 C = A,A = C
rs11108076 12 95897348 (G/A) 0.8141 C = G,A = A
rs11108079 12 95899173 (G/A) 0.8141 C = G,A = A
rs12146719 12 95901434 (C/A) 0.8141 C = C,A = A
rs61939479 12 95905364 (C/T) 0.8141 C = C,A = T
rs2305293 12 95879734 (C/T) 0.8095 C = C,A = T
rs11519597 12 95894247 (T/C) 0.8095 C = T,A = C
rs61939477 12 95896692 (A/G) 0.8095 C = A,A = G
rs4762563 12 95915341 (G/C) 0.805 C = G,A = C
rs7929543 rs11603576 11 49344126 (G/A) 0.9947 A = G,C = A FOLH1, AC118942.1
rs10839264 11 49356806 (C/T) 0.9511 A = C,C = T
rs76218798 11 49356186 (T/C) 0.9366 A = T,C = C
rs11607791 11 49358347 (T/C) 0.9339 A = T,C = C
rs1880436 11 49344775 (A/G) 0.92 A = A,C = G
rs148517532 11 49332611 (A/G) 0.9188 A = A,C = G
rs144550850 11 49366641 (T/C) 0.9175 A = T,C = C
rs1843629 11 49319195 (G/A) 0.9161 A = G,C = A
rs75781920 11 49371482 (T/G) 0.9152 A = T,C = G
rs76427006 11 49375021 (T/A) 0.9149 A = T,C = A
rs7932396 11 49299282 (A/G) 0.9112 A = A,C = G
rs1843628 11 49323039 (A/G) 0.9033 A = A,C = G
rs7939300 11 49311134 (C/A) 0.8985 A = C,C = A
rs7939316 11 49311208 (A/G) 0.8985 A = A,C = G
rs11040313 11 49299786 (A/G) 0.8915 A = A,C = G
rs11040291 11 49248150 (C/T) 0.8898 A = C,C = T
rs61350355 11 49292311 (G/A) 0.8757 A = G,C = A
rs16906190 11 49203487 (A/G) 0.8709 A = A,C = G
rs11040354 11 49409798 (G/A) 0.847 A = G,C = A
rs10839244 11 49263085 (A/G) 0.8406 A = A,C = G
rs74380550 11 49236977 (C/T) 0.8301 A = C,C = T
rs59386222 11 49235409 (G/A) 0.8288 A = G,C = A
rs4091958 11 49234514 (T/C) 0.8286 A = T,C = C
rs11040365 11 49448078 (C/A) 0.826 A = C,C = A
rs10839237 11 49215635 (C/T) 0.8187 A = C,C = T
rs76002284 11 49271829 (A/G) 0.8145 A = A,C = G
rs11040352 11 49395272 (A/C) 0.8039 A = A,C = C

Furthermore, to pinpoint possible deregulation at the mRNA levels, attributed to the 64 proxy SNPs, we performed analysis using the GTex and Blood eQTL databases for the identification of eQTLs in disease-affected tissues (Table 2).

2.3. Common Susceptibility Genes in AML and T2D

Beyond the identification of specific genetic variants associated with both AML and T2D, we proceeded to the detection of common susceptibility genes between the two disorders. Analysis using combined data from the GWAS Catalog and the GTex portal showed that 86 genes bear SNPs that have been significantly associated with the development of both diseases, as per GWAS performed (Figure 3A). These include the five genes with common SNPs and another 81 disease-specific genes. Notably, most of the genes contain a significantly higher number of SNPs associated with AML compared to T2D (Table 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Common and disease-specific SNPs and eQTLs per target tissue. Venn diagrams reporting: (A) the number of common and disease-specific susceptibility genes between AML and T2D, (B) the numbers of AML- or T2D-specific SNPs that act as eQTLs upon the expression of common AML/T2D susceptibility genes, in adipose, skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas and whole blood, (C) the number of tissue-specific and common AML- or T2D- SNPs. Analysis was performed combining data from the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of GWAS and GTex portal.

Table 4.

Common genes with common or different disease susceptibility SNPs for AML and T2D, as analyzed using data downloaded from the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of human GWAS [3] (May 2021).

Gene Symbol Full Gene Name AML SNPs T2D SNPs
1 AC003681.1 - rs3788418, rs12627929, rs8139217, rs7285751, rs737903, rs36600, rs5752972, rs11090584, rs36608, rs5763609, rs39713, rs2051764, rs9614125, rs9625870, rs737904, rs737911, rs41170, rs5763681, rs36605, rs41158, rs4823058, rs41164, rs3788421, rs713718, rs5763559, rs737909, rs41159, rs3788425, rs5763688, rs7284538, rs5997546 rs41278853
2 AC006041.1 - rs13225661, rs10242655, rs12113983, rs17348974, rs7811500, rs12532826, rs17169090, rs10950583 rs38221
3 AC010967.1 - rs10204358, rs903230, rs745685, rs17044784, rs9677678, rs985549, rs903229, rs17044786, rs903231, rs17044787 rs9309245
4 AC016903.2 - rs1545378 rs4482463
5 AC022414.1 - rs10942819, rs10061629, rs6453303, rs11750661, rs17671389, rs9293712, rs9784696, rs6453304 rs7732130, rs4457053, rs6878122
6 AC022784.1 - rs17656706, rs330003, rs6984551, rs11777846, rs75527, rs17149618, rs330035, rs330033, rs17656431, rs735449 rs17662402
7 AC034195.1 - rs11717189, rs6768756 rs9842137
8 AC069157.2 - rs10204358, rs903230, rs745685, rs17044784, rs9677678, rs985549, rs903229, rs17044786, rs903231, rs17044787 rs9309245
9 AC073176.2 - rs950718 rs827237
10 AC087311.2 - rs12227331, rs11052394 rs10844518, rs10844519
11 AC093675.1 - rs4567941 rs34589210
12 AC093898.1 - rs1503886, rs1039539, rs7673064, rs7681205, rs11934728, rs2320289, rs1847400, rs11941617 rs2169033
13 AC097634.4 - rs9844845, rs17653411, rs9840264 rs844215, rs853866
14 AC098588.2 - rs11100859, rs2719340, rs6817612 rs200995462
15 AC098588.3 - rs11100859, rs2719340, rs6817612 rs200995462, rs75686861
16 AC098650.1 - rs6549877, rs1350867, rs2371341, rs6549876, rs4258916, rs1381392, rs1563981, rs6549878 rs9869477
17 AC114971.1 - rs10067455 rs73167517
18 AC118942.1 - rs10501324, rs7929543, rs7115281, rs3960835, rs1164681, rs1164673, rs1164666, rs10769572, rs12806588, rs2204366, rs7930322, rs2205020, rs11040338, rs11040339, rs10839257, rs7118379, rs598101, rs10839272, rs7925896, rs7924782, rs7114817, rs588295 rs7929543
19 AFF3 AF4/FMR2 Family Member 3 rs6707538, rs7423759, rs17023314, rs4449188, rs7577040, rs17436893 rs34506349
20 AL135878.1 - rs10138733, rs4981687, rs8016028, rs8022374, rs1951540, rs17114593, rs3950100, rs8022457, rs8016946, rs17560052, rs8020665 rs8005994
21 AL135923.2 - rs10815796, rs10815795, rs10815793 rs10758950
22 AL136114.1 - rs2065140, rs1885645, rs3131325, rs1923640, rs2065141, rs10494504, rs1885644 rs532504, rs539515
23 AL136962.1 - rs7552571 rs9316706
24 AL359922.1 - rs10965197, rs2027938, rs10757261, rs9657608 rs1063192
25 AL391117.1 - rs10811816, rs10811815, rs1350996 rs11793831, rs7029718
26 ASAH1 N-Acylsphingosine Amidohydrolase (Acid Ceramidase) rs17692377, rs382752, rs11782529 rs34642578
27 AUTS2 Activator of Transcription and Developmental Regulator rs7459368, rs7791651, rs2057913, rs1557970, rs4718971, rs3922333, rs1008584, rs11772435, rs17578487, rs2057914, rs2057911, rs10486866 rs2103132, rs6947395, rs6975279, rs12698877, rs10618080, rs610930
28 CACNA2D3 Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Auxiliary Subunit Alpha2delta3 rs11711040, rs6805548 rs76263492
29 CHMP4B Charged Multivesicular Body Protein 4B rs2050209, rs6088343, rs2092475, rs17091328 rs7274168
30 CPNE4 Copine 4 rs3851353, rs1010900, rs17341291, rs1850941, rs16838814, rs3900591, rs9853646, rs16838856, rs10512856, rs12636272, rs6792708, rs11708369, rs1505811, rs4522813, rs3914303, rs2369466, rs3922808, rs10934990, rs9876304, rs7626343 rs9857204, rs1225052
31 CRTC1 CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 rs2023878, rs17757406, rs6510997, rs12462498, rs6510999, rs2240887, rs7256986 rs10404726
32 CSMD1 CUB and Sushi Multiple Domains 1 rs592700, rs11779410, rs13277378, rs4876060, rs596332, rs673465 rs117173251
33 DGKB Diacylglycerol Kinase Beta rs10244653, rs10486042, rs17167995 rs17168486, rs10281892, rs11980500
34 EIF2S2P7 Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2 Subunit Beta rs2193632, rs6714162, rs2870503, rs768329 rs1116357
35 EML6 EMAP-Like 6 rs10496035, rs4625954, rs13394146 rs5010712
36 ERBB4 Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 4 rs10207288, rs10174084, rs13019783, rs4673628, rs4423543, rs6759039 rs3828242, rs13005841
37 FAM86B3P Family with sequence similarity 86, member A pseudogene rs13274039, rs2980417, rs2945230, rs2980422, rs10095669, rs2980420 rs7841082
38 FSD2 Fibronectin type III and SPRY domain containing 2 rs4779064 rs36111056
39 GP2 Glycoprotein 2 rs8046269, rs12930599, rs11642182, rs9937721, rs4383154 rs117267808
40 GRID1 Glutamate Ionotropic Receptor Delta Type Subunit 1 rs1991426, rs4933387, rs7084960, rs1896526, rs17096224, rs11201974, rs1896527, rs1896525, rs7918205 rs11201999, rs11201992
41 GRK5 G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5 rs12357403, rs17606601, rs4752269, rs10787945, rs7903013, rs12264832, rs17098576, rs12358835, rs12244897, rs10886439, rs4752276, rs17098586, rs10510056 rs10886471
42 HPSE2 Heparanase 2 rs12219674, rs527822, rs592142, rs10748739, rs657442, rs537851, rs521390, rs10883130, rs650527, rs526877, rs7907389, rs551674, rs10509724, rs523205, rs10883134, rs558398, rs526698, rs2018085, rs17538604, rs621644, rs552644, rs489611, rs552436, rs625777, rs11189692, rs563937, rs660426, rs17459507, rs898892, rs541519 rs524903
43 KCNB2 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel Subfamily B Member 2 rs2251899 rs349359
44 KCNQ1 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel Subfamily Q Member 1 rs10832134, rs12576156, rs11523905 rs2283159, rs163184, rs2237896, rs2283228, rs2237897, rs2237892, rs2237895, rs231362, rs2283220, rs231361, rs231349, rs163182, rs233450, rs77402029, rs2106463, rs463924, rs231356, rs233449, rs8181588, rs234853
45 LCORL Ligand-Dependent Nuclear Receptor Corepressor-Like rs1503886, rs1039539, rs7673064, rs7681205, rs11934728, rs2320289, rs1847400, rs11941617 rs2169033, rs2011603
46 LDLRAD4 Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Class A Domain Containing 4 rs7241766, rs6505821, rs7230189, rs8091352, rs7230276 rs11662800
47 LHFPL3 LHFPL Tetraspan Subfamily Member 3 rs2106504, rs17136882, rs13234807, rs6958831, rs7794181, rs979522, rs7787976, rs7787988 rs73184014
48 LINC00424 Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 424 rs9316684, rs7320437, rs9316683, rs17074792 rs9316706
49 LINC01234 Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 1234 rs4766686, rs10850140 rs7307263
50 LINC02641 Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 2641 rs845083, rs2282015, rs1219960, rs845084, rs11597044, rs7091877, rs6599698 rs705145
51 LINGO2 Leucine-Rich Repeat and Ig Domain Containing 2 rs1452338, rs10511822, rs1349638, rs10124164, rs16912518 rs1412234
52 MERTK MER Proto-Oncogene, Tyrosine Kinase rs11684476 rs34589210
53 MLIP Muscular LMNA-Interacting Protein rs9357785, rs1325831, rs16884633, rs12191362, rs9464019, rs1359563, rs1325833, rs9637973, rs7750294, rs9370259 rs9370243
54 MTMR3 Myotubularin-Related Protein 3 rs3788418, rs12627929, rs8139217, rs7285751, rs737903, rs36600, rs5752972, rs11090584, rs36608, rs5763609, rs39713, rs2051764, rs9614125, rs9625870, rs737904, rs737911, rs41170, rs5763681, rs36605, rs41158, rs4823058, rs41164, rs3788421, rs713718, rs5763559, rs737909, rs41159, rs3788425, rs5763688, rs7284538, rs5997546 rs41278853
55 NELL1 Neural EGFL-Like 1 rs4412753, rs11025959, rs1377744, rs4923393, rs4576820, rs7119634, rs7948285, rs10500896, rs10833472, rs1945321 rs16907058
56 NFATC2 Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells 2 rs17791950, rs4396773, rs4811167, rs6021170, rs1123479, rs959996 rs6021276
57 NLGN1 Neuroligin 1 rs9809489, rs6782940, rs16829698, rs1502461, rs6776485, rs16829573 rs686998, rs247975
58 OARD1 O-Acyl-ADP-Ribose Deacylase 1 rs6912013, rs9296355, rs7760860 rs7841082
59 PAM Peptidylglycine Alpha-Amidating Monooxygenase rs888801, rs467186, rs258132, rs462957, rs458256, rs2657459, rs401114, rs438126, rs451819, rs442443, rs382964, rs382946, rs647343 rs78408340
60 PARD3B Par-3 Family Cell Polarity Regulator Beta rs4673320, rs1990667, rs10179357, rs849207, rs16837235, rs907462, rs2160455, rs849250, rs12620034, rs10490293, rs10490292, rs4673324, rs4595957, rs4673329, rs2668152 rs4482463
61 PCSK6 Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 6 rs9806369, rs12905649, rs11858490, rs12719737, rs2047219, rs2047220, rs4965873, rs903552, rs11852310, rs11858491 rs6598475
62 PKHD1 Polycystic kidney and hepatic disease 1 rs1326570, rs41412044, rs9370050, rs728996, rs11754532, rs6458777, rs2104522, rs2894788, rs2397061, rs9474070, rs4715233, rs2104521, rs6922497, rs6940892- rs1819564
63 POLR1D RNA Polymerase I And III Subunit D rs12584838, rs9551373, rs531950, rs10492484, rs7337722, rs667374, rs12876263, rs12870355, rs17821569, rs9507915, rs634035, rs542610, rs6491221, rs12050009 rs9319382
64 PPARG Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma rs10517032, rs10517031, rs2324237, rs16874420, rs10020457, rs10517030, rs2324241 rs17036160
65 PPP2R2C Protein Phosphatase 2 Regulatory Subunit B gamma rs11946417, rs4505896, rs4689469, rs6446507, rs10937739, rs11938118, rs4689011, rs4689462, rs4076293, rs7654321, rs4234751, rs4689465 rs35678078
66 PRAG1 PEAK1 Related, Kinase-Activating Pseudokinase 1 rs13274039, rs2980417, rs2945230, rs2980422, rs10095669, rs2980420 rs7841082
67 PTPRD Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type D rs10815796, rs10815795, rs10815793 rs10758950, rs17584499
68 RBMS3 RNA Binding Motif Single-Stranded Interacting Protein 3 rs6549877, rs1350867, rs2371341, rs6549876, rs4258916, rs1381392, rs1563981, rs6549878 rs9869477
69 RELN Reelin rs6961175, rs10235204, rs2106283, rs2106282, rs6465955, rs6955789, rs6465954 rs39328
70 RPL12P33 Ribosomal protein L12 pseudogene 33 rs10774577, rs6489785, rs7300612, rs7969196, rs11065341, rs2701179, rs868795 rs118074491
71 RPS6KA1 Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase A1 rs3127011, rs12094989, rs12723046, rs6685701, rs1982525, rs11576300, rs4659444, rs6670311 rs6685701
72 RPTOR Regulatory Associated Protein of MTOR Complex 1 rs8065459, rs9915426, rs2333990, rs2589133, rs2138125, rs734338 rs11150745
73 RREB1 Ras Responsive Element Binding Protein 1 rs10458204, rs4960285, rs12196079, rs17142726, rs12197730, rs552188, rs7759330, rs3908470, rs6597246 rs9505085, rs9505097, rs9379084
74 SEPTIN9 Septin 9 rs8079522, rs1075457, rs3744069, rs9916143, rs312907, rs11658267, rs892961, rs566569, rs11650011, rs2411110 rs1656794
75 SGCG Sarcoglycan Gamma rs578196, rs501909, rs502068 rs9552911
76 SGCZ Sarcoglycan Zeta rs17608649, rs7826655, rs12547159, rs13278000 rs35753840, rs17294565
77 SHROOM3 Shroom Family Member 3 rs6848817, rs13151434, rs6810716, rs13105942, rs4241595, rs10050141, rs6854652 rs11723275, rs56281442
78 SLC39A11 Solute Carrier Family 39 Member 11 rs11077627, rs11077628, rs4530179, rs11658711 rs61736066
79 SYT10 Synaptotagmin 10 rs12227331, rs11052394 rs10844518, rs10844519
80 TMEM106B Transmembrane Protein 106B rs12537849, rs10237821, rs10269431, rs7794113 rs13237518
81 TMEM87B Transmembrane Protein 87B rs6713344, rs4848979, rs4848980 rs74677818
82 TTN Titin rs7604033, rs10497522, rs2291313, rs11902709, rs2291311, rs4894044, rs10497523, rs2054708, rs1484116, rs10171049, rs3754953, rs4471922, rs11895382, rs4894037, rs2291312, rs7600001 rs6715901
83 USP44 Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 44 rs3812813, rs10777699, rs2769444, rs7974458, rs10498964, rs301024, rs301003 rs2197973
84 XYLT1 Xylosyltransferase 1 rs4453460, rs4583225 rs551640889
85 ZFHX3 Zinc Finger Homeobox 3 rs328398, rs328389, rs328317, rs328384, rs328395 rs6416749, rs1075855
86 ZNF800 Zinc Finger Protein 800 rs11563463, rs2285337, rs2285338, rs11563346, rs11563634 rs17866443

To investigate whether these genes comprise eGenes, which have at least one eQTL located near the gene of origin (cis-eQTL) acting upon them, affected by AML or T2D-specific SNPs in-disease target tissues, we searched through the GTex and eQTL Browsers. Analysis using Venn diagrams identified AML- or T2D-specific SNPs/eQTLs in certain susceptibility genes in adipose, muscle tissue, liver, pancreas and/or whole blood (Figure 3B). In adipose tissue, 6517 eQTLs on common AML/T2D susceptibility genes were detected, of which 79 were AML- and 8 T2D-specific. In skeletal muscle, 4220 were identified—28 AML- and 5 T2D-specific. In liver, 602 were detected—seven AML- and none T2D-specific. In pancreas, 3507 were found—36 AML- and 5 T2D-specific. Finally, in whole blood, 7187 were identified—55 AML- and 10 T2D-specific. A complementary analysis of the same data revealed the distribution of the AML- or T2D- SNPs/eQTLs in disease-target tissues and identified common and tissue-specific ones (Figure 3C and Table 5). All identified eQTLs affecting the 86 common disease susceptibility genes are included in Supplementary Table S2.

Table 5.

AML- or T2D- specific SNPs that act as eQTLs on the 86 common AML/T2D susceptibility genes in a tissue-specific manner, as analyzed via the GTex portal [21] (May 2021).

AML-Specific T2D-Specific
SNP ID Associated Gene Affected Gene (s) SNP ID Associated Gene Affected Gene (s)
Adipose, Muscle, Pancreas, Whole Blood
1 rs1168446 AC093675.1, MERTK MERTK (ad, pa, bl), TMEM87B (mu, bl)
2 rs4848980 TMEM87B MERTK (pa, mu), TMEM87B (bl, ad)
3 rs5752972 ASCC2, MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad, bl, mu, pa)
4 rs11684321 MERTK MERTK (pa, mu, ad, bl), TMEM87B (mu, ad, bl)
5 rs9625870 ASCC2, MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad, bl, pa)
6 rs4848979 TMEM87B MERTK (pa, bl, mu, ad), TMEM87B (mu, pa, ad, bl)
7 rs1168446 AC093675.1, MERTK MERTK (pa, mu, ad), TMEM78B (ad, pa, mu, bl)
Adipose, Muscle, Pancreas
1 rs2769444 USP44 USP44 (pa, mu, ad) rs4382480 MFHAS1 FAM86B3P (ad, pa, mu), PRAG1 (ad), FAM85B (ad),
2 rs13274039 PRAG1, FAM86B3P FAM86B3P (ad), FAM85B (ad)
3 rs301003 USP44 USP44 (pa, mu, ad)
4 rs301026 METAP2 USP44 (mu, pa, ad)
5 rs301024 USP44 USP44 (pa, ad)
6 rs301009 METAP2 USP44 (pa, mu, ad)
Adipose, Muscle, Whole blood
1 rs8139217 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (bl, mu) rs7274168 CHMP4B CHMP4B (bl, mu, ad)
2 rs737911 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl, mu)
3 rs7285751 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (bl, mu, ad)
4 rs3788421 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (bl, mu, ad)
5 rs41158 HORMAD2-AS1, MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl, mu)
6 rs7284538 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (bl, ad, mu)
7 rs41170 HORMAD2-AS1, MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl, mu)
Adipose, Pancreas, Whole blood
1 rs4261758 SPTBN1 EML6 (pa, ad, bl) rs34589210 AC093675.1, MERTK MERTK (pa), TMEM87B (ad, bl)
2 rs4567941 AC093675.1 MERTK (pa, bl), TMEM87B (ad, pa, bl)
3 rs36605 MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad, bl, pa)
4 rs17039558 TDRP EML6 (pa, ad, bl)
5 rs737904 MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad, bl, pa)
6 rs3811640 MERTK MERTK (pa), TMEM87B (ad, bl)
7 rs6734445 SPTBN1 EML6 (pa, ad, bl)
8 rs36600 MTMR3 MTMR3(ad, bl, pa)
9 rs11904679 AC092839.1, SPTBN1 EML6 (pa, ad, bl)
10 rs6713344 TMEM87B MERTK (pa, bl, ad), TMEM87B (ad, pa, bl)
Muscle, Pancreas, Whole blood
1 rs13237518 TMEM106B TMEM106B (bl, pa, mu)
Adipose, Muscle
1 rs11563634 ZNF800 ZNF800 (mu, ad) rs11723275 SHROOM3 SHROOM3 (mu, ad)
2 rs10937739 PPP2R2C PPP2R2C (mu, ad)
3 rs2285338 ZNF800 ZNF800 (ad, mu)
4 rs11563346 ZNF800 ZNF800 (mu, ad)
5 rs4689465 PPP2R2C PPP2R2C (ad, mu)
6 rs4689469 PPP2R2C PPP2R2C (mu, ad)
Adipose, Pancreas
1 rs11887259 MERTK TMEM87B (ad), MERTK (pa, ad) rs7841082 PRAG1, FAM86B3P FAM86B3P (ad, pa), FAM85B (ad), PPP1R3B (pa)
2 rs6729826 SPTBN1 EML6 (ad)
3 rs4671956 AC092839.2, SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
4 rs4374383 MERTK TMEM87B (ad), MERTK (pa, ad)
5 rs3811638 MERTK TMEM87B (ad), MERTK (pa, ad)
6 rs2945230 PRAG1, FAM86B3P FAM86B3P (ad, pa), FAM85B (ad)
7 rs13016942 SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
8 rs12104998 AC092839.1, SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
9 rs12105792 SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
10 rs1367295 AC092839.1, SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
11 rs11683409 MERTK MERTK (ad, pa), TMEM87B (ad)
12 rs17344072 SPTBN1 EML6 (ad, pa)
Adipose, Liver
1 rs4659444 DPPA2P2, HMGN2 RPS6KA1 (li)
2 rs1359563 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (ad, li)
3 rs12094989 DPPA2P2, RPS6KA1 RPS6KA1 (li, ad)
4 rs9637973 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (li, ad)
5 rs1325831 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (li, ad)
Adipose, Whole blood
1 rs5997546 ASCC2, MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad)
2 rs5763688 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl)
3 rs41159 HORMAD2-AS1, MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl)
4 rs634035 POLR1D POLR1D (ad)
5 rs5763559 ASCC2, MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad, bl)
6 rs737909 MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad, bl)
7 rs2051764 MTMR3 MTMR3 (bl)
8 rs667374 POLR1D POLR1D (bl, ad)
Muscle, Whole blood
1 rs382752 PCM1, ASAH1 ASAH1 (bl, mu)
Pancreas, Whole blood
1 rs74677818 TMEM87B TMEM87B (bl), MERTK (pa)
Adipose
1 rs17821569 POLR1D POLR1D (ad) rs11201992 GRID1 GRID1 (ad)
2 rs12905649 PCSK6 PCSK6 (ad) rs56281442 SHROOM3 SHROOM3 (ad)
3 rs10883130 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad) rs11201999 GRID1 GRID1 (ad)
4 rs12876263 POLR1D POLR1D (ad)
5 rs898892 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
6 rs7907389 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
7 rs7337722 POLR1D POLR1D (ad)
8 rs737903 MTMR3 MTMR3 (ad)
9 rs10748739 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
10 rs2980420 PRAG1, FAM86B3P FAM86B3P (ad)
11 rs650527 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
12 rs7750294 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (ad)
13 rs10883134 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
14 rs2018085 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
15 rs41164 HORMAD2-AS1, MTMR3, AC003681.1 MTMR3 (ad)
16 rs621644 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
17 rs542610 POLR1D POLR1D (ad)
18 rs489611 HPSE2 HPSE2 (ad)
Muscle
1 rs4505896 PPP2R2C PPP2R2C (mu) rs11150745 RPTOR RPTOR (mu)
Pancreas
1 rs9370050 PKHD1 PKHD1 (pa)
Liver
1 rs12191362 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (li)
2 rs16884633 MLIP-AS1, MLIP MLIP (li)
Whole blood
1 rs382964 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl) rs115505614 GIN1 PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
2 rs10179948 MERTK TMEM87B (bl) rs35658696 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
3 rs382946 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl) rs75432112 AC011362.1 PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
4 rs258132 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl) rs9319382 AL136439.1, POLR1D POLR1D (bl)
5 rs401114 PAM PAM (bl, ad), PPIP5K2 (bl) rs610930 AUTS2 AUTS2 (bl)
6 rs442443 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl) rs7729395 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
7 rs462957 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
8 rs6088343 CHMP4B, TPM3P2 CHMP4B (bl)
9 rs458256 PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
10 rs451819 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl)
11 rs17098576 GRK5 GRK5 (bl)
12 rs17692377 PCM1, ASAH1 ASAH1 (bl)
13 rs10211152 MERTK TMEM87B (bl), MERTK (bl)
14 rs12050009 POLR1D POLR1D (bl)
15 rs11782529 PCM1, ASAH1 ASAH1 (bl)
16 rs9551373 POLR1D POLR1D (bl)
17 rs10095669 PRAG1, FAM86B3P FAM86B3P (bl)
18 rs467186 PAM PAM (bl)
19 rs6142044 PIGPP3, TPM3P2 CHMP4B (bl)
20 rs2657459 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
21 rs438126 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)
22 rs647343 AC099487.2, PAM PAM (bl), PPIP5K2 (bl)

ad: Adipose, bl: whole blood, li: liver, mu: muscle, pa: pancreas.

2.4. Pathway Analysis of the Proteins Encoded by the Common AML/T2D Susceptibility Genes

To investigate the possible involvement of the 86 common susceptibility genes in molecular networks correlated with both disorders, the developed gene/protein panel was further processed through the STRING and KEGG databases [25,26]. The following eGenes found to be affected by the five common susceptibility SNPs as well as by their proxies in disease-affected tissues were included in the analysis: DHDDS (Dehydrodolichyl Diphosphate Synthase Subunit), GATA3, METAP2, RP11-347H15.5, RPS6KA1, SYN2, TIMP4. The corresponding protein–protein interaction (PPI) network is depicted in Figure 4A. Analysis revealed that numerous proteins of the above set are significantly involved in metabolic pathways, including pyrimidine, purine, choline metabolism, mTOR, AMPK, PI3K-Akt and insulin signaling, as well as pathways deposited as related to AML (FDR < 0.05 for all) (Figure 4B and Table 6).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pathways and protein–protein interactions regulated by the common AML/T2D-related genes. (A). Pathways enriched upon gene set analysis of 86 AML/T2D common susceptibility genes plus the seven eGenes affected by the five common AML/T2D susceptibility genes and their proxies, using KEGG database. (B). Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network developed upon processing the set in the STRING database. Different genes/proteins involved in different (one or more) pathways are designated by the differently colored nodes. Edges represent protein–protein associations—either known interactions, predicted interactions or other associations.

Table 6.

Selected pathways significantly regulated by the set of 86 AML/T2D susceptibility genes plus seven eGenes affected by the five common AML/T2D susceptibility genes and their proxies, as analyzed upon processing in the STRING and KEGG databases [25,26]. Pathway IDs and description, number of susceptibility genes involved, number of background genes, their names as well as statistics (strength, FDR and log10FDR) for each pathway are reported.

Term ID Term Description Observed Gene Count Background Gene Count Strength FDR log10FDR Matching Proteins in the Network
hsa00240 Pyrimidine metabolism 16 100 1.57 3.17 × 10−18 17.50 POLR2C, POLR2I, TWISTNB, POLR3B, POLR1A, POLR2D, POLR2J, POLR3E, POLR2G, POLR1D, POLR2L, POLR3C, POLR2K, POLR3H, POLR3A, POLR1C
hsa00230 Purine metabolism 16 173 1.33 6.30 × 10−15 14.20 POLR2C, POLR2I, TWISTNB, POLR3B, POLR1A, POLR2D, POLR2J, POLR3E, POLR2G, POLR1D, POLR2L, POLR3C, POLR2K, POLR3H, POLR3A, POLR1C
hsa04150 mTOR signaling pathway 14 148 1.34 3.30 × 10−13 12.48 MAPK1, TSC2, LAMTOR5, RHEB, RRAGB, LAMTOR1, RPTOR, EIF4EBP1, LAMTOR4, MTOR, LAMTOR2, RRAGD, RRAGC, RPS6KA1
hsa04152 AMPK signaling pathway 8 120 1.19 1.56 × 10−6 5.81 TSC2, RHEB, PPARGC1A, PPARG, RPTOR, PPP2R2C, EIF4EBP1, MTOR
hsa04211 Longevity regulating pathway 7 88 1.26 3.02 × 10−6 5.52 TSC2, RHEB, PPARGC1A, PPARG, RPTOR, EIF4EBP1, MTOR
hsa01100 Metabolic pathways 20 1250 0.57 4.74 × 10−6 5.32 POLR2C, POLR2I, TWISTNB, POLR3B, XYLT1, POLR1A, POLR2D, POLR2J, POLR2G, POLR1D, POLR2L, POLR3C, POLR2K, POLR3H, HPSE2, POLR3A, POLR1C, ASAH1, MTMR3, DGKB
hsa04910 Insulin signaling pathway 7 134 1.08 3.31 × 10−5 4.48 MAPK1, TSC2, RHEB, PPARGC1A, RPTOR, EIF4EBP1, MTOR
hsa05231 Choline metabolism in cancer 6 98 1.15 6.93 × 10−5 4.16 MAPK1, TSC2, RHEB, EIF4EBP1, MTOR, DGKB
hsa04151 PI3K-Akt signaling pathway 9 348 0.77 2.60 × 10−3 3.59 MAPK1, TSC2, RHEB, RPTOR, PPP2R2C, EIF4EBP1, ERBB4, MTOR, RELN
hsa05221 Acute myeloid leukemia 3 66 1.02 2.41 × 10−2 1.62 MAPK1, EIF4EBP1, MTOR

Differently colored nodes designate various genes/proteins involved in one or more pathways. Edges represent protein–protein associations—either known interactions, predicted interactions or other associations. All regulated pathways revealed in this analysis are included in Supplementary Table S3.

2.5. Investigation of Aberrant mRNA Expression of T2D-Deregulated Genes in an AML Cohort

The second aim of the study was to investigate the possible deregulation of T2D-related metabolic mechanisms in AML patients. To this end, we selected a panel of genes previously reported to be deregulated in T2D patients [4] (CAPN10, CDK5, CDKN2A, IGF2BP2, KCNQ1, THADA, TSPAN8) and explored their mRNA levels in peripheral blood samples from AML- versus non-cancerous individuals utilizing RNAseq data and the TNMplot web tool [27]. Significantly increased mRNA levels of CAPN10, CDK5, CDKN2A, IGF2BP2 and THADA, as well as significantly decreased levels of KCNQ1 and TSPAN8, were found in 151 AML patients compared to 407 normal individuals tested (Mann–Whitney p < 0.0004 for all). The percentage (%) of AML samples that displayed up- or downregulated expression for each of the above genes, at each of the four quantile cut-off values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum), as well as the specificity (the ratio of the number of AML samples to the sum of AML and non-cancerous samples over or below each given cut-off), are depicted in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Differential expression levels of T2D-related genes in AML individuals. (A). Dot-plot/whisker bars depicting the differential mRNA levels of the CAPN10, CDK5, CDKN2A, IGF2BP2, KCNQ1, THADA, TSPAN8 T2D susceptibility genes in AML patients. P-values of significance as obtained by Mann–Whitney test are reported. (B). Bar diagrams showing the: (i) percentage (%) of AML samples that possesses higher or lower of each gene-of-interest compared to non-cancerous samples, at each of the four quantile cut-off values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum) (left y-axis), and (ii) specificity defined as the ratio of the number of AML samples to the sum of AML and non-cancerous samples over or below each given cut-off (right y-axis).

To search for AML-specific SNPs on these deregulated genes, we used data obtained from the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of GWAS. It was found that rs10832134 (chromosomal location: 11:2481256), rs12576156 (11:2477588) and rs11523905 (11:2477029) variants lie in the KCNQ1 (p = 3 × 10−15 for all), while the rest of the deregulated genes have not been identified to bear AML-related SNPs. Investigation for their proxies revealed three proxy SNPs (rs12574553, rs757092, rs7126330) for rs10832134 and five proxy SNPs (rs73419519, rs7937273, rs7928116, rs179395, rs7542142) for rs12576156, all of them in KCNQ1. No proxies were found for rs11523905 (data not shown). Out of these, the proxy SNP rs12574553 (allele C/T) consists of an eQTL for KCNQ1; the minor allele leads to the downregulation of mRNA levels in whole blood [21].

3. Discussion

Today, there is a well-accepted epidemiological link between T2D and cancer development [5]. However, in other types of human neoplasia, the association between T2D and hematological malignancies is less explored. Among them, AML represents one of the most intriguing morbidities for further investigation due to its increasing rates and relatively poor prognosis and response to treatment [10,28]. Accumulating clinical evidence connecting metabolic syndrome parameters (including BMI and T2D) to AML [9,11,12,13,14,15,16], together with corresponding in vitro data [17,18,19], highlights the need for investigation of the underlying mechanisms implicating genetic predisposition, which may regulate metabolic abnormalities.

In this study, we first aimed at the description of the possible common genetic background shared by the two disorders. Processing of the thousands of AML- and T2D-associated SNPs deposited in the GWAS NHGRI-EBI Catalog uncovered five SNPs that are significantly linked to both diseases (Table 1). Two of them (rs11709077, rs1801282) lie in the PPARG gene, the first gene reproducibly associated with T2D [29,30]. The gene encodes for the PPAR-γ receptor, a molecular target of thiazolidinediones (insulin-sensitizing antidiabetic drugs); gene variants affecting its transcription levels in adipose tissue are associated with insulin sensitivity [29,30]. Although there are no data directly linking PPARG with AML, it is worth mentioning that the protein is implicated in the TGF-beta and mTOR signaling pathways, both associated with cancer development [31,32,33]. Our analyses also indicated that rs11709077 and rs1801282 on PPARG negatively affect the expression of SYN2 (Synapsin II) in skeletal muscle and in whole blood (Table 2, Figure 1); however, there is not yet any evidence connecting SYN2 with T2D or AML.

Another common SNP, which is a missense variant rs1801282, was found to negatively regulate the expression of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 4 (TIMP4) in visceral adipose tissue. The TIMP family has been associated with several cancers [34], but no information about its relation to T2D is available yet. Another interesting observation regards the negative impact of rs1801282 on GATA3 in whole blood. GATA3 is a transcription factor with a multi-faceted role in hematopoiesis [35], while related genetic and epigenetic aberrations are strongly associated with AML development, prognosis and response to therapy [36,37]. Regarding T2D, GATA3 is considered an anti-adipogenic factor and a potential molecular therapeutic target for insulin resistance, through restoration of adipogenesis and amelioration of inflammation [38,39].

Rs6685701, located in the gene encoding for the ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1 (RPS6KA1 or P90S6K), was found to be associated with its lower expression levels in visceral adipose tissue. The protein belongs to the family of serine/threonine kinases that govern various cellular processes, and it acts downstream of ERK (MAPK1/ERK2 and MAPK3/ERK1) signaling [33]. In murine models of T2D, RPS6KA1 has been implicated in impaired glucose homeostasis in β-pancreatic, muscle and liver cells [40,41], which is improved upon sitagliptin (DPP-4 inhibitor; antidiabetic drug) administration [42]. Using an in vivo model of leukemia, RPS6KA1 has been shown to promote the self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells and disease progression through the regulation of the mTOR pathway [43]. More importantly, it was very recently reported that RPS6KA1 may be a strong indicator of overall survival in AML patients, while aberrations in the miR-138-5p/RPS6KA1 axis are associated with poor prognosis among patients [44].

The rs11108094 in USP44 (ubiquitin-specific peptidase 44) was also recognized as a common susceptibility variant for AML and T2D, which acts as an eQTL downregulating the expression of METAP2 (methionyl aminopeptidase 2) in subcutaneous and adipose tissue. The USP44 protein is implicated in protein metabolism and ubiquitin-mediated proteasome-dependent proteolysis. More importantly, METAP2 is involved in the metabolism of fat-soluble vitamins [33]. Its inhibition results in weight loss in obese rodents, dogs and humans and has been proposed as a therapeutic target against obesity [45]. On the other hand, METAP2 inhibitors have been shown to induce apoptosis in leukemic cell lines [46], which renders them potent therapeutic agents also for leukemia. Lastly, the rs7929543 variant on the AC118942.1 pseudogene was identified as an eQTL influencing the expression of the RP11-347H15.5 pseudogene in visceral adipose tissue. The involvement of this deregulation in possible pathogenetic processes for both diseases might be part of the complex underlying genetic–molecular mechanisms.

To describe the network of genetic variants’ inheritance more extensively, we developed a panel of 64 unique proxy SNPs associated with the five common AML/T2D ones (Table 2). Interestingly, these proxies are found to lie within and/or be eQTLs for the aforementioned genes (PPARG, SYN2, TIMP4, GATA3, RPS6KA1, USP44, METAP2, AC118942.1, RP11-347H15.5) in disease-target tissues. A new eGene added to the panel was DHHS, which is downregulated in whole blood by SNPs on RP11-347H15.5. The gene encodes for the dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit and is involved in pathways of protein metabolism and in N-glycan biosynthesis [33]. However, no direct data connecting the gene with neoplasias or diabetes have been reported to date.

Next, we identified a panel of 86 common AML/T2D susceptibility genes using the GWAS NHGRI-EBI Catalog (Figure 3). Several SNPs specific for each disease were found to impact the expression patterns of some of these common susceptibility genes in affected tissues, suggesting their possible functional involvement in disease development (Table 5). Pathway analysis revealed that the AML/T2D gene set regulates a series of metabolic pathways, with the highest significance observed for pyrimidine and purine metabolism. Although neither AML or T2D is purely a disorder of pyrimidine and/or purine metabolism, there are data supporting their implication in the development of each disease. The insulin effect on their regulation in diabetic liver is knowledge obtained decades ago [47,48]. Nevertheless, it was very recently described that the signatures of purine metabolites, including betaine metabolites, branched-chain amino acids, aromatic amino acids, acylglycine derivatives and nucleic acid metabolites, are associated with hyperglycemia or insulin resistance [49,50]. While there is no recent evidence regarding a possible role for purine and pyrimidine metabolites in leukemia, older studies support the notion that reciprocal alterations in the phenotype of specific enzymes may occur in leukemia cells [51,52].

Choline metabolism is another pathway that emerged through gene set enrichment analysis. Indeed, its upregulation in malignant transformation is well described [53], while the serum metabolomic signature of AML patients includes parameters of aberrant choline metabolism [54]. A group of metabolic pathways, including those of carbohydrates, lipids, nucleotides, amino acids, glycans, cofactors, vitamins, biosynthesis of terpenoids, polyketides and other secondary metabolites [25], as well as signaling pathways related to metabolic disturbances and the development of neoplasia and T2D, such as mTOR, AMPK, PI3K-Akt and insulin signaling pathways, were also among the ontologies significantly regulated by the AML/T2D gene set. Analysis also revealed an association with a pathway category deposited as “Acute Myeloid Leukemia”, which refers to ERK, PI3K and JAK-STAT signaling and transcription regulation pathways including mutated RUNX1 and the fusion genes AML1-ETO, PML-RARA and PLZF-RARA [33].

Finally, exploration through clinical datasets revealed that certain T2D-related genes, previously shown to be deregulated in T2D individuals [4], also exhibit deviated transcriptomic levels in AML patients. Expression levels of THADA (thyroid adenoma-associated protein), IGF2BP2 (insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2), CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) and CDK5 (cyclin-dependent kinase 5) were upregulated, while levels of KCNQ1 (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1) were downregulated in the peripheral blood of AML patients compared to normal subjects. IGF2BP2, CDKN2A, CDK5 and KCNQ1 are known to be implicated in the mass development, proliferation, and insulin secretory function of β-cells, and in metabolic processes in T2D-affected tissues [3,20,55,56]. As for THADA, despite its susceptibility to T2D, there are no data yet related to its involvement in the disease’s pathogenesis and/or metabolic pathways [4]. However, chromosomal aberrations engaging this gene are observed in benign thyroid adenomas [57]. CAPN10 (calpain 10) shows increased whereas TSPAN8 (Tetraspanin 8) exhibits decreased mRNA levels in AML versus non-cancerous individuals, a trend opposite to what was observed in T2D versus healthy subjects. CAPN10 plays important roles in the translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), secretion of insulin and apoptotic processes in pancreatic cells [57], while TSPAN8 has been described as a prognostic indicator for patients with certain solid tumors [58,59], but not for hematological malignancies.

In summary, this study provides, for the first time, evidence for a strong genetic network that is related to aberrations in metabolic processes and molecular pathways, shared between AML and T2D. Even though the metabolic vulnerability of AML cells and aberrant metabolic pathways observed in AML patients [54,60] have increasingly gained the attention of the research community, the genetic background leading to these metabolic disturbances had not yet been investigated. Data emerging from our study revealed that: (i) specific genetic variants (SNPs) associated with both AML and T2D, as well as their co-inherited proxy SNPs, mostly specific for each disease rather than common, can alter the gene expression patterns in disease-target tissues; (ii) common susceptibility genes and genes with altered expression may be linked to the development of AML or T2D through common (such as PPARG) or different mechanisms (such as GATA3) and (iii) common susceptibility genes can regulate metabolic pathways, which may be implicated in the pathogenetic mechanisms leading to the development of the two disorders. It should be noted, however, that the study has certain limitations, including that it exclusively analyzed in silico data and the fact that other parameters affecting the gene expression, such as epigenetic mechanisms, were not explored. Moreover, in the case of certain genes and their SNPs, i.e., those of PPARG and GATA3, their specific implication in AML and/or T2D development is not well documented. Therefore, it is yet difficult to provide a plausible explanation regarding their possible impact as risk factors for AML in the context of T2D. Lastly, it needs to be clarified that, although some of the reported SNPs are associated with certain genes involved in AML (such as RPS6KA1 and METAP2), the latter are not considered driver genes for AML initiation.

Despite these limitations, significant evidence emerging from this study can be further explored in future basic and clinical studies. For example, the common susceptibility genes revealed can be evaluated for their potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers of AML development in cohorts of T2D individuals. Moreover, in depth exploration of the described metabolic pathways and involved genes may lead to a better understanding of the pathogenetic basis of the increased risk for AML development observed in individuals with T2D. Finally, detailed investigation of the common therapeutic targets identified may suggest that repurposing of metabolic drugs (i.e., DPP-4 inhibitor targeting RPS6KA1 or thiazolidinediones targeting PPAR-γ) could be exploited as novel therapeutic strategies to enhance the anti-leukemic armamentarium.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design

Our study was performed in two axes. (A) Detection of common genetic variants and deregulated pathways in T2D and AML: We first created a panel of SNPs associated with AML or T2D, upon an in-depth search in the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published GWAS [3], to detect common disease susceptibility genes. Their proxy SNPs were also detected using the LDLink web tool [24]. For the possible impact of the common susceptibility SNPs and their proxies on gene mRNA expression, a combined search in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project [21] and the Blood eQTL Browser [22] was performed. Moreover, a panel of mutual genes bearing common or disease (AML or T2D)-specific genes were processed through pathway analysis using the STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) database [26], to reveal associated molecular networks and biological processes. (B) Investigation of possible deregulated expression of T2D susceptibility genes in AML cohorts: A panel of T2D susceptibility genes that were previously described to exert aberrant mRNA levels in diabetic patients was explored for their possible deregulated expression also in AML patients, using the TNMplot tool [27].

4.2. Development of the AML and T2D Susceptibility SNP Panels and Detection of Common SNPs

The panels of total susceptibility genes specific for AML and T2D were developed upon an in-depth search in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog [3]. All populations were considered for assessment. Common disease susceptibility genes were detected, generating Venn diagrams with the Draw-Venn-Diagrams online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) (May 2021). A genome-wide statistically significant p-value lower than or equal to 5 × 10−8 was applied to detect the SNPs that were significantly associated with the diseases. Data regarding the prevalence of the SNPs of interest in the general population were obtained from the gnomAD browser [61].

4.3. Detection of Proxy SNPs

Proxy SNPs of disease susceptibility SNPs of interest were detected utilizing the LDLink tool [24]. LDLink interactively explores proxy and putatively functional variants/SNPs for a query/tag variant (±500 kilobases). The tool provides information about: (A) a squared correlation measure (R2) of linkage disequilibrium (LD); proxy SNPs are considered those having ≥80% possibility of coinheritance with the tag SNP, which equals to a R2 value ≥ 0.8, and (b) the combined recombination rate (cM/Mb) from HapMap; the recombination rate is the rate at which the association between the two loci is changed. It combines the genetic (cM) and physical positions (Mb) of the marker by an interactive plot.

4.4. Detection of Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs)

Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), which explain variations in mRNA expression levels, related to the SNPs of interest were explored utilizing the GTEx portal and the Blood eQTL Browser [21,22]. Analysis was focused on the expression patterns in the total target tissues of the two diseases (as per their availability in the databases). These included adipose tissue (subcutaneous, visceral), skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas and whole blood.

4.5. Pathway Analysis

Analysis through the STRING [26] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [25] databases was performed to detect protein–protein interactions possibly regulated by a panel including: (i) proteins encoded by genes that bear disease susceptibility SNPs in both AML and T2D as well as (ii) proteins encoded by genes that are commonly affected by different AML-specific and T2D-specific SNPs. To filter significantly regulated pathways, a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 was set as cut-off.

4.6. Investigation of the Expression Patterns of T2D-Deregulated Genes in AML Clinical Cohorts

To explore possible variations in the mRNA expression levels of previously described T2D-deregulated genes [4] in patients with AML, the TNMplot tool was used [27]. In more detail, analysis processed whole-exome sequencing data from 151 AML patients versus 407 non-cancerous individuals, available in the database. The tool compared the expression levels of each gene in the two groups using the Mann–Whitney non-parametric test, reporting the p-value of significance and the fold-change between groups. Other information included (a) the percentage (%) of AML samples that exerted up- or downregulated expression of query genes compared to non-cancerous samples, at each of the four quantile cut-off values (minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum), and (b) the specificity, defined as the ratio of the number of AML samples to the sum of AML and non-cancerous samples over or below each given cut-off.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22179322/s1. Supplementary Table S1. Total SNPs associated with AML or T2D. Data obtained upon search in the NHGRI-EBI Catalog of GWAS [3] (May 2021). Supplementary Table S2. Total eQTLs affecting the 86 AML/T2D common susceptibility genes in adipose, skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas, and whole blood. Data obtained from the GTex portal [21] (May 2021). Supplementary Table S3. Total KEGG pathways regulated by the 86 AML/T2D susceptibility genes and eGenes, as revealed upon analysis through STRING database [25,26] (May 2021). Supplementary Figure S1. Frequency of the five T2D/AML common SNPs in the general population. Bar diagrams depicting the number of carriers of each of the SNPs and the total number of individuals included in each age group. Details regarding their frequency in different populations and males or females are reported in the embedded table. Data were downloaded from https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/ (accessed on 11 August 2021).

Author Contributions

T.-C.K.: Acquisition of data, bioinformatics analysis, revision of the manuscript. P.P.: Critical revision of the manuscript. M.-I.C.: Study conception, design and supervision, bioinformatics analysis, writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Saeedi P., Salpea P., Karuranga S., Petersohn I., Malanda B., Gregg E.W., Unwin N., Wild S.H., Williams R. Mortality attributable to diabetes in 20–79 years old adults, 2019 estimates: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020;162:108086. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Desiderio A., Spinelli R., Ciccarelli M., Nigro C., Miele C., Beguinot F., Raciti G.A. Epigenetics: Spotlight on type 2 diabetes and obesity. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2016;39:1095–1103. doi: 10.1007/s40618-016-0473-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buniello A., MacArthur J.A.L., Cerezo M., Harris L.W., Hayhurst J., Malangone C., McMahon A., Morales J., Mountjoy E., Sollis E., et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D1005–D1012. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Christodoulou M.I., Avgeris M., Kokkinopoulou I., Maratou E., Mitrou P., Kontos C.K., Pappas E., Boutati E., Scorilas A., Fragoulis E.G. Blood-based analysis of type-2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility genes identifies specific transcript variants with deregulated expression and association with disease risk. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37856-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giovannucci E., Harlan D.M., Archer M.C., Bergenstal R.M., Gapstur S.M., Habel L.A., Pollak M., Regensteiner J.G., Yee D. Diabetes and cancer: A consensus report. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010;60:207–221. doi: 10.3322/caac.20078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pearson-Stuttard J., Zhou B., Kontis V., Bentham J., Gunter M.J., Ezzati M. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to diabetes and high body-mass index: A comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:e6–e15. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30150-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fernandez C.J., George A.S., Subrahmanyan N.A., Pappachan J.M. Epidemiological link between obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer. World J. Methodol. 2021;11:23–45. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Christodoulou M.I., Scorilas A. Metformin and Anti-Cancer Therapeutics: Hopes for a More Enhanced Armamentarium Against Human Neoplasias? Curr. Med. Chem. 2017;24:14–56. doi: 10.2174/0929867323666160907161459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yan P., Wang Y., Fu T., Liu Y., Zhang Z.J. The association between type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus and the risk of leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 cohort studies. Endocr. J. 2021;68:281–289. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harding J.L., Shaw J.E., Peeters A., Cartensen B., Magliano D.J. Cancer risk among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Disentangling true associations, detection bias, and reverse causation. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:264–270. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ross J.A., Parker E., Blair C.K., Cerhan J.R., Folsom A.R. Body mass index and risk of leukemia in older women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004;13:1810–1813. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calle E.E., Rodriguez C., Walker-Thurmond K., Thun M.J. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1625–1638. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Larsson S.C., Wolk A. Overweight and obesity and incidence of leukemia: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int. J. Cancer. 2008;122:1418–1421. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abar L., Sobiecki J.G., Cariolou M., Nanu N., Vieira A.R., Stevens C., Aune D., Greenwood D.C., Chan D.S.M., Norat T. Body size and obesity during adulthood, and risk of lympho-haematopoietic cancers: An update of the WCRF-AICR systematic review of published prospective studies. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:528–541. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Biondani G., Peyron J.F. Metformin, an Anti-diabetic Drug to Target Leukemia. Front. Endocrinol. 2018;9:446. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nelson M.A., McLaughlin K.L., Hagen J.T., Coalson H.S., Schmidt C., Kassai M., Kew K.A., McClung J.M., Neufer P.D., Brophy P., et al. Intrinsic OXPHOS limitations underlie cellular bioenergetics in leukemia. Elife. 2021;10:e63104. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miwa H., Shikami M., Goto M., Mizuno S., Takahashi M., Tsunekawa-Imai N., Ishikawa T., Mizutani M., Horio T., Gotou M., et al. Leukemia cells demonstrate a different metabolic perturbation provoked by 2-deoxyglucose. Oncol. Rep. 2013;29:2053–2057. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suganuma K., Miwa H., Imai N., Shikami M., Gotou M., Goto M., Mizuno S., Takahashi M., Yamamoto H., Hiramatsu A., et al. Energy metabolism of leukemia cells: Glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2010;51:2112–2119. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2010.512966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cariaso M., Lennon G. SNPedia: A wiki supporting personal genome annotation, interpretation and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1308–D1312. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carithers L.J., Ardlie K., Barcus M., Branton P.A., Britton A., Buia S.A., Compton C.C., DeLuca D.S., Peter-Demchok J., Gelfand E.T., et al. A Novel Approach to High-Quality Postmortem Tissue Procurement: The GTEx Project. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2015;13:311–319. doi: 10.1089/bio.2015.0032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Westra H.J., Peters M.J., Esko T., Yaghootkar H., Schurmann C., Kettunen J., Christiansen M.W., Fairfax B.P., Schramm K., Powell J.E., et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:1238–1243. doi: 10.1038/ng.2756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Slatkin M. Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008;9:477–485. doi: 10.1038/nrg2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Machiela M.J., Chanock S.J. LDlink: A web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3555–3557. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kanehisa M., Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szklarczyk D., Franceschini A., Wyder S., Forslund K., Heller D., Huerta-Cepas J., Simonovic M., Roth A., Santos A., Tsafou K.P., et al. STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D447–D452. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bartha A., Gyorffy B. TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2622. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yi M., Li A., Zhou L., Chu Q., Song Y., Wu K. The global burden and attributable risk factor analysis of acute myeloid leukemia in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017: Estimates based on the global burden of disease study 2017. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020;13:72. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00908-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prasad R.B., Groop L. Genetics of type 2 diabetes-pitfalls and possibilities. Genes. 2015;6:87–123. doi: 10.3390/genes6010087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deeb S.S., Fajas L., Nemoto M., Pihlajamaki J., Mykkanen L., Kuusisto J., Laakso M., Fujimoto W., Auwerx J. A Pro12Ala substitution in PPARgamma2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity. Nat. Genet. 1998;20:284–287. doi: 10.1038/3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Populo H., Lopes J.M., Soares P. The mTOR signalling pathway in human cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:1886–1918. doi: 10.3390/ijms13021886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Papageorgis P. TGFbeta Signaling in Tumor Initiation, Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition, and Metastasis. J. Oncol. 2015;2015:587193. doi: 10.1155/2015/587193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Belinky F., Nativ N., Stelzer G., Zimmerman S., Iny Stein T., Safran M., Lancet D. PathCards: Multi-source consolidation of human biological pathways. Database. 2015;2015:bav006. doi: 10.1093/database/bav006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Z., Jing Q., Wu L., Chen J., Huang M., Qin Y., Wang T. The prognostic and diagnostic value of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases gene family and potential function in gastric cancer. J. Cancer. 2021;12:4086–4098. doi: 10.7150/jca.57808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaidan N., Ottersbach K. The multi-faceted role of Gata3 in developmental haematopoiesis. Open Biol. 2018;8:180152. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu Q., Hua M., Yan S., Zhang C., Wang R., Yang X., Han F., Hou M., Ma D. Immunorelated gene polymorphisms associated with acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2020;201:266–278. doi: 10.1111/cei.13446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang H., Zhang N., Wang R., Shao T., Feng Y., Yao Y., Wu Q., Zhu S., Cao J., Zhang H., et al. High expression of miR-363 predicts poor prognosis and guides treatment selection in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Transl. Med. 2019;17:106. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1858-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al-Jaber H., Al-Mansoori L., Elrayess M.A. GATA-3 as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2021;17:169–179. doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200705210417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Al-Mansoori L., Al-Jaber H., Madani A.Y., Mazloum N.A., Agouni A., Ramanjaneya M., Abou-Samra A.B., Elrayess M.A. Suppression of GATA-3 increases adipogenesis, reduces inflammation and improves insulin sensitivity in 3T3L-1 preadipocytes. Cell. Signal. 2020;75:109735. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shum M., Houde V.P., Bellemare V., Junges Moreira R., Bellmann K., St-Pierre P., Viollet B., Foretz M., Marette A. Inhibition of mitochondrial complex 1 by the S6K1 inhibitor PF-4708671 partly contributes to its glucose metabolic effects in muscle and liver cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:12250–12260. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Han J.H., Kim S., Kim S., Lee H., Park S.Y., Woo C.H. FMK, an Inhibitor of p90RSK, Inhibits High Glucose-Induced TXNIP Expression via Regulation of ChREBP in Pancreatic beta Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4424. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qiao S., Mao G., Li H., Ma Z., Hong L., Zhang H., Wang C., An J. DPP-4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin Improves Cardiac Function and Glucose Homeostasis and Ameliorates beta-Cell Dysfunction Together with Reducing S6K1 Activation and IRS-1 and IRS-2 Degradation in Obesity Female Mice. J. Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:3641516. doi: 10.1155/2018/3641516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ghosh J., Kobayashi M., Ramdas B., Chatterjee A., Ma P., Mali R.S., Carlesso N., Liu Y., Plas D.R., Chan R.J., et al. S6K1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and leukemia maintenance. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:2621–2625. doi: 10.1172/JCI84565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yu D.H., Chen C., Liu X.P., Yao J., Li S., Ruan X.L. Dysregulation of miR-138-5p/RPS6KA1-AP2M1 Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in AML. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:641629. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.641629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Farrell P.J., Zopf C.J., Huang H.J., Balakrishna D., Holub C., Bilakovics J., Fanjul A., Matuszkiewicz J., Plonowski A., Rolzin P., et al. Using Target Engagement Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Efficacy of MetAP2 Inhibitors. J. Pharm. Exp. 2019;371:299–308. doi: 10.1124/jpet.119.259028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu X., Addlagatta A., Lu J., Matthews B.W., Liu J.O. Elucidation of the function of type 1 human methionine aminopeptidase during cell cycle progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:18148–18153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608389103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pillwein K., Reardon M.A., Jayaram H.N., Natsumeda Y., Elliott W.L., Faderan M.A., Prajda N., Sperl W., Weber G. Insulin regulatory effects on purine- and pyrimidine metabolism in alloxan diabetic rat liver. Padiatr. Padol. 1988;23:135–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Weber G., Lui M.S., Jayaram H.N., Pillwein K., Natsumeda Y., Faderan M.A., Reardon M.A. Regulation of purine and pyrimidine metabolism by insulin and by resistance to tiazofurin. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 1985;23:81–99. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(85)90041-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Concepcion J., Chen K., Saito R., Gangoiti J., Mendez E., Nikita M.E., Barshop B.A., Natarajan L., Sharma K., Kim J.J. Identification of pathognomonic purine synthesis biomarkers by metabolomic profiling of adolescents with obesity and type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0234970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Romeo G.R., Jain M. Purine Metabolite Signatures and Type 2 Diabetes: Innocent Bystanders or Actionable Items? Curr. Diab. Rep. 2020;20:30. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-01313-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yamaji Y., Shiotani T., Nakamura H., Hata Y., Hashimoto Y., Nagai M., Fujita J., Takahara J. Reciprocal alterations of enzymic phenotype of purine and pyrimidine metabolism in induced differentiation of leukemia cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1994;370:747–751. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2584-4_156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Marijnen Y.M., de Korte D., Roos D., van Gennip A.H. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism of normal and leukemic lymphocytes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1989;253A:433–438. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5673-8_71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Glunde K., Bhujwalla Z.M., Ronen S.M. Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:835–848. doi: 10.1038/nrc3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Musharraf S.G., Siddiqui A.J., Shamsi T., Choudhary M.I., Rahman A.U. Serum metabonomics of acute leukemia using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30693. doi: 10.1038/srep30693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kong Y., Sharma R.B., Nwosu B.U., Alonso L.C. Islet biology, the CDKN2A/B locus and type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetologia. 2016;59:1579–1593. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3967-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yasuda K., Miyake K., Horikawa Y., Hara K., Osawa H., Furuta H., Hirota Y., Mori H., Jonsson A., Sato Y., et al. Variants in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:1092–1097. doi: 10.1038/ng.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rippe V., Drieschner N., Meiboom M., Murua Escobar H., Bonk U., Belge G., Bullerdiek J. Identification of a gene rearranged by 2p21 aberrations in thyroid adenomas. Oncogene. 2003;22:6111–6114. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fekete T., Raso E., Pete I., Tegze B., Liko I., Munkacsy G., Sipos N., Rigo J., Jr., Gyorffy B. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles associated with histological classification and survival in 829 ovarian cancer samples. Int. J. Cancer. 2012;131:95–105. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maisonial-Besset A., Witkowski T., Navarro-Teulon I., Berthier-Vergnes O., Fois G., Zhu Y., Besse S., Bawa O., Briat A., Quintana M., et al. Tetraspanin 8 (TSPAN 8) as a potential target for radio-immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:22034–22047. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Buettner R., Nguyen L.X.T., Morales C., Chen M.H., Wu X., Chen L.S., Hoang D.H., Hernandez Vargas S., Pullarkat V., Gandhi V., et al. Targeting the metabolic vulnerability of acute myeloid leukemia blasts with a combination of venetoclax and 8-chloro-adenosine. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021;14:70. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01076-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Karczewski K.J., Francioli L.C., Tiao G., Cummings B.B., Alfoldi J., Wang Q., Collins R.L., Laricchia K.M., Ganna A., Birnbaum D.P., et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES