Skip to main content
Revista Paulista de Pediatria logoLink to Revista Paulista de Pediatria
. 2021 Sep 1;40:e2020202. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020202

Intermittent abdominal pain in IgA vasculitis

Dor abdominal intermitente na vasculite por IgA

Izabel Mantovani Buscatti a, Juliana Russo Simon a, Vivianne Saraiva Leitao Viana a, Tamima Mohamad Abou Arabi a, Vitor Cavalcanti Trindade a, Ana Carolina Cortez Maia a, Lara Regina Cavalcante Melo a, Bianca Pires Ihara a, Nadia Emi Aikawa a, Clovis Artur Silva a,*
PMCID: PMC8432068  PMID: 34495272

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To assess intermittent abdominal pain in IgA vasculitis patients and its relation to demographic data, clinical manifestations and treatments.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study included 322 patients with IgA vasculitis (EULAR/PRINTO/PRES criteria) seen at the Pediatric Rheumatology Unit in the last 32 years. Sixteen patients were excluded due to incomplete data in medical charts. Intermittent abdominal pain was characterized by new abdominal pain after complete resolution in the first month of disease.

Results:

Intermittent abdominal pain was observed in 35/306 (11%) IgA vasculitis patients. The median time between first and second abdominal pain was 10 days (3–30 days). The main treatment of intermittent abdominal pain included glucocorticoid [n=26/35 (74%)] and/or ranitidine [n=22/35 (63%)]. Additional analysis showed that the frequency of intermittent purpura/petechiae (37 vs. 21%; p=0.027) and the median of purpura/petechiae duration [20 (3–90) vs. 14 (1–270) days; p=0.014] were significantly higher in IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain compared to those without. Gastrointestinal bleeding (49 vs. 13%; p<0.001), nephritis (71 vs. 45%; p=0.006), glucocorticoid (74 vs. 44%; p=0.001) and intravenous immunoglobulin use (6 vs. 0%; p=0.036) were also significantly higher in the former group. The frequency of ranitidine use was significantly higher in IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain versus without (63 vs. 28%; p<0.001), whereas the median of ranitidine duration was reduced in the former group [35 (2–90) vs. 60 (5–425) days; p=0.004].

Conclusions:

Intermittent abdominal pain occurred in nearly a tenth of IgA vasculitis patients, in the first 30 days of disease, and was associated with other severe clinical features. Therefore, this study suggests that these patients should be followed strictly with clinical and laboratorial assessment, particularly during the first month of disease course.

Keywords: Immunoglobulin A, Abdominal pain, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, Glucocorticoid, Ranitidine

INTRODUCTION

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis, previously termed as Henoch-Schönlein purpura, is the most frequent primary vasculitis reported in children and adolescents’ populations.1 5 This vasculitis is characterized by skin, articular, renal and gastrointestinal involvements.1 6

Acute onset of diffuse colicky abdominal pain has been described in up to 12% of IgA vasculitis patients at diagnosis. This gastrointestinal manifestation may be associated with serious complications, as bowel intussusception or gastrointestinal bleeding.1 , 2

Of note, recurrent or intermittent colicky abdominal pain in IgA vasculitis were seldom described in previous case reports or case series.1 , 2 , 7 11 However, to our knowledge, additional analysis comparing patients with versus patients without intermittent abdominal pain in the first month of IgA vasculitis were not carried out.

Thus, the aim of the present study was to characterize intermittent colicky abdominal pain in the first month of children and adolescents with IgA vasculitis, and to assess the possible association of demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratorial abnormalities and treatments in patients with and without this gastrointestinal manifestation.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed during a period of 32 years in a tertiary Pediatric Rheumatology Unit in São Paulo, Brazil. We analyzed 322 medical records. Of these, 16 were excluded due to lack of data. The remaining 306 patients fulfilled European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES) IgA vasculitis classification criteria.6 This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee.

Demographic data, such as age at diagnosis in years, gender and body mass index (BMI), were evaluated.

Abdominal pain was defined as diffuse colicky abdominal pain with acute onset assessed by medical history and physical exam. Severe abdominal pain was described as the presence of at least one of the subsequent: abdominal angina (severe postprandial diffuse colicky abdominal pain),12 bowel intussusception or gastrointestinal bleeding. Intermittent abdominal pain was arbitrarily identified herein as a new episode of diffuse colicky abdominal ache after the complete resolution of the first event, both episodes occurring in the first month of disease.10 , 11 Recurrent abdominal pain was defined as another flare of abdominal pain after the first month of disease. Abdominal Doppler ultrasound was performed in those IgA vasculitis patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.1 The time between first and second diffuse colicky abdominal pain was also evaluated.

Intermittent purpura/petechiae were characterized as new skin lesions after total recovery of first episode, and persistent purpura/petechiae as cutaneous lesions lasting more than 30 days. The definition of arthritis was joint pain with limitation on movement or articular edema. Arthralgia was defined by articular pain without edema or limitation on motion.1 3 Intermittent arthralgia/arthritis, as new onset articular inflammation after total resolution.1 3 Orchitis was described as the presence of scrotal swelling and/or tenderness in physical exam and/or testicular Doppler ultrasound alterations.2 The duration of orchitis was measured in days.

Nephritis was defined as hematuria >5 red blood cells/high power field or presence of red blood cells in the urinary sediment and/or proteinuria >0.1g/m2/day. Nephrotic syndrome was diagnosed according to edema, serum albumin <2.5g/L and proteinuria >1g/m2/day.3 Acute kidney injury was characterized by increase in serum creatinine >2mg/dL13 or according to modified RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of renal function and End-stage renal disease) criteria.14 Arterial hypertension was categorized as systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥95th percentile according to gender, age, and height on 3 or more occasions.15

Neuropsychiatric involvement was characterized by the presence of at least one of the following manifestations: headache, impaired consciousness, seizures, hemiparesis and cortical blindness.16 Current drugs were also recorded: prednisone/prednisolone, intravenous methylprednisolone, ranitidine, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), azathioprine, cyclosporine, intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) and plasmapheresis.

Patients with IgA vasculitis were divided into two groups: with and without intermittent abdominal pain in the first month of disease course.

Results were presented as median (range) or mean±standard deviation for continuous variables, and number (%) for categorical variables. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. Mann-Whitney test or Student’s t-test were used to compare continuous variables. For all statistical tests, a p-value less than 0.05 was considered with statistical significance.

RESULTS

Intermittent abdominal pain in the first month of disease was observed in 35/306 (11%) of IgA vasculitis patients, and generally reported as colicky and diffuse abdominal pain. This intermittent abdominal pain was associated with new cutaneous lesions in the first month of disease in 32/35 (91%) of IgA vasculitis patients. The median time between the first and the second episode of abdominal pain was 10 days (3–30 days). The main treatment of intermittent abdominal pain included glucocorticoid [n=26/35 (74%)] and/or ranitidine [n=22/35 (63%)]. Only one IgA vasculitis patient had recurrent abdominal pain at 5 year of disease. At that moment, he reported colicky and diffuse abdominal pain, concomitantly with new cutaneous lesions and nephritis flare.

Table 1 includes demographic data and clinical/laboratory involvements in 306 IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain compared to those without this condition. The frequency of intermittent purpura/petechiae (37 vs. 21%; p=0.027) and the median of purpura/petechiae duration [20 (3–90) vs. 14 (1–270) days; p=0.014] were significantly higher in IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain compared to those without this complication. Severe abdominal pain (60 vs. 29%; p<0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (49 vs. 13%; p<0.001), nephritis (71 vs. 45%; p=0.006) and hematuria (56 vs. 25%; p<0.001) were significantly higher in the intermittent abdominal pain IgA vasculitis patients (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic data and clinical/laboratory involvements in 306 IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain compared to those without this condition.

Variables at diagnosis, n (%) With intermittent abdominal pain (n=35) Without intermittent abdominal pain (n=271) p-value
Demographic data
Age at diagnosis, years 7.3 (2.2–13.1) 6 (1.25–17.6) 0.073
Follow-up duration, months 12 (1–180) 12 (0–180) 0.248
Female, n=305 16/35 (46) 131/270 (48) 0.859
Body mass index, kg/m2 15.9 (12.3–28.4) 16.1 (10.6–32.7) 0.728
Clinical/laboratorial involvements
Intermittent purpura/petechiae, n=303 13/35 (37) 55/268 (21) 0.027
Purpura/petechiae duration, days 20 (3–90) 14 (1–270) 0.014
Arthritis/arthralgia, n=305 26/35 (74) 214/270 (79) 0.499
Intermittent arthritis/arthralgia, n=305 4/35 (4) 15/270 (6) 0.252
Arthritis/arthralgia duration, days 4 (1–30) 5 (0–28) 0.842
Abdominal pain, n=305 35/35 (100) 153/270 (57) <0.001
Severe abdominal pain, n=184 21/35 (60) 43/149 (29) <0.001
Gastrointestinal bleeding, n=303 17/35 (49) 34/268 (13) <0.001
Bowel intussusception 1/35 (3) 0/271 (0) 0.115
Nephritis, n=296 24/34 (71) 119/262 (45) 0.006
Arterial hypertension, n=256 7/30 (23) 32/226 (15) 0.185
Nephrotic syndrome, n=297 1/35 (3) 3/262 (1) 0.396
Acute kidney injury, n=291 0/34 (0) 5/257 (2) 1.000
Leukocyturia, n=295 8/34 (23) 45/261 (17) 0.396
Urinary casts, n=295 3/34 (8) 22/261 (8) 1.000
Hematuria, n=295 19/34 (56) 65/261 (25) <0.001
Proteinuria, n=223 15/29 (52) 73/194 (38) 0.159
Neuropsychiatric involvement, n=305 0/35 (0) 1/270 (0) 1.000
Increased serum IgA (>255mg/dL), n=168 9/20 (45) 57/148 (38) 0.577
Orchitis, n=305 3/35 (9) 24/270 (9) 1.000
Orchitis duration, days 4 (3–7) 4 (1–17) 0.842

Results are presented as median (minimum value–maximum value) or n (%).

Regarding treatment, glucocorticoid (74 vs. 44%; p=0.001) and intravenous immunoglobulin use (6 vs. 0%; p=0.036) were also significantly higher in IgA vasculitis patients with versus without intermittent abdominal pain. The median of glucocorticoid therapy duration was higher in the first group [72.5 (1–365) vs. 40 (1–144) days; p=0.012]. The frequency of ranitidine use was significantly higher in IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain versus without (63 vs. 28%; p<0.001), whereas the median of ranitidine therapy duration was reduced in the former group [35 (2–90) vs. 60 (5–425) days; p=0.004] (Table 2).

Table 2. Treatment in 306 IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain* compared to those without this condition.

Treatments, n (%) Number of studied patients With intermittent abdominal pain (n=35) Without intermittent abdominal pain (n=271) p-value
Glucocorticoid 305 26/35 (74) 119/270 (44) 0.001
Prednisone/prednisolone (mg/kg/day) 1.8 (1–2) 1.5 (0–3) 0.801
Glucocorticoid (days of use) 72.5 (1–365) 40 (1–144) 0.012
Ranitidine 304 22/35 (63) 76/269 (28) <0.001
Ranitidine (days of use) 35 (2–90) 60 (5–425) 0.004
Immunosuppressive agents** 305 1/35 (3) 0/270 (0) 0.115
Intravenous immunoglobulin 305 2/35 (6) 1/270 (0) 0.036

Results are presented as median (minimum value - maximum value) or n (%).

*

In the first month of disease

**

azathioprine, cyclosporine or intravenous cyclophosphamide.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this was the first study that demonstrated intermittent abdominal pain in the first month of disease as a rare manifestation of IgA vasculitis patients and was associated with skin manifestations, nephritis and severe gastrointestinal involvement. In addition, recurrent abdominal pain was rarely observed in IgA vasculitis patients.

The advantage of the present study was the selection of this population followed in a tertiary center in Latin America with predominance of complex patients.17 Furthermore, all subjects fulfilled the validated EULAR/PRINTO/PRES classification criteria6 and were systematically assessed according to our standardized database, as previously reported.1 , 2

At disease onset, approximately three quarters of our IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain had nephritis, suggesting a severe and periodic systemic involvement of this vasculitis. Indeed, nephritis is also commonly associated with IgA vasculitis flares, as reported in a study with Finland population.18

Additionally, intermittent abdominal pain occurred in the first 30 days of IgA vasculitis patients. Therefore, these patients should be followed strictly with clinical and laboratorial assessment, particularly during the first month of disease course.

Regarding treatment, ranitidine showed to be effective in gastrointestinal manifestations in IgA vasculitis patients, decreasing duration and severity of gastrointestinal pain and bleeding as described in a Turkish research.19 Our study demonstrated that, in spite of a higher use of ranitidine in IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain, the ranitidine use duration was reduced, suggesting that this H2-receptor antagonist seem to be a protective factor for this periodic abdominal pain.

Of note, recently US Food and Drug Administration alerts to healthcare professionals that ranitidine contains low levels of nitrosamine impurity called N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).20 This substance is identified as a probable human carcinogen, and the risk and benefit should be individually considered for each patient.21 Further studies will be necessary to clarify this issue.

Moreover, glucocorticoid use is indicated for severe and complicated abdominal pain in IgA vasculitis patients.22 Our study demonstrated that IgA vasculitis patients with intermittent abdominal pain required this medication more frequently and for a longer period.

The median time between the first and second episode of intermittent diffuse colicky abdominal pain was short, and the vast majority of patients associated with new cutaneous lesions, indicating that this pain etiology was probably due to disease activity. The diagnosis of abdominal pain in IgA vasculitis is usually easy and rarely requires a differential diagnosis with esophagitis, gastritis or gastric ulcer.

The main limitation observed in the present study was the retrospective analysis, with potential missing data. We also did not assess the serum galactose-deficient IgA1, a well-known biomarker of IgA vasculitis associated with severe abnormalities at diagnosis.23 Abdominal Doppler ultrasound was only assessed in those IgA vasculitis patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

In conclusion, intermittent abdominal pain occurred in nearly a tenth of IgA vasculitis patients, in the first 30 days of disease, and was associated with other severe clinical features. Therefore, our study suggests that these patients should be followed strictly with clinical and laboratorial assessment, particularly during the first month of disease course.

Footnotes

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 303422/2015-7 to CAS), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2015/03756-4 to CAS) and by Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa “Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente” da USP (NAP-CriAd) to CAS.

Declaration

The database that originated the article is available with the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Buscatti IM, Casella BB, Aikawa NE, Watanabe A, Farhat SC, Campos LM, et al. Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis: initial risk factors and outcomes in a Latin American tertiary center. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:1319–1324. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3972-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buscatti IM, Abrão HM, Kozu K, Marques VL, Gomes RC, Sallum AM, et al. Characterization of scrotal involvement in children and adolescents with IgA vasculitis. Adv Rheumatol. 2018;58:38–38. doi: 10.1186/s42358-018-0039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almeida JL, Campos LM, Paim LB, Leone C, Koch VH, Silva CA. Renal involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: a multivariate analysis of initial prognostic factors. J Pediatr. 2007;83:259–266. doi: 10.2223/jped.1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabelo CR, Jr, Yamaguti R, Ribeiro AM, Melo BA, Campos LA, Silva CA. Hemorrhagic vesicle-bullous lesions in Henoch-Schönlein purpura and review of literature. Acta Reumatol Port. 2008;33:452–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Suehiro RM, Soares BS, Eisencraft AP, Campos LM, Silva CA. Acute hemorrhagic edema of childhood. Turk J Pediatr. 2007;49:189–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ozen S, Pistorio A, Iusan SM, Bakkaloglu A, Herlin T, Brik R, et al. EULAR/PRINTO/PRES criteria for Henoch-Schönlein purpura, childhood polyarteritis nodosa, childhood Wegener granulomatosis and childhood Takayasu arteritis: Ankara 2008. Part II: Final classification criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:798–806. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.116657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pabunruang W, Treepongkaruna S, Tangnararatchakit K, Chunharas A, Phuapradit P. Henoch-Schönlein purpura: clinical manifestations and long-term outcomes in Thai children. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85(Suppl 4):S1213–S1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chou T, Louissant VR, Adams A, Gurkan S, Chefitz D, Weller AS, et al. Successful treatment of Henoch-Schönlein purpura with recurrent gastrointestinal involvement with mycophenolate mofetil: a brief report. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2015;54:900–903. doi: 10.1177/0009922814568288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lim CJ, Chen JH, Chen WL, Shen YS, Huang CC. Jejunojejunum intussusception as the single initial manifestation of Henoch-Schönlein purpura in a teenager. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:2085.E1–2085.E3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karakayali B, Yilmaz S, Çakir D, Günes PG, Güven S, Islek I. Henoch-Schönlein purpura associated with primary active Epstein-Barr virus infection: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:29–29. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.29.10481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Belman AL, Leicher CR, Moshé SL, Mezey AP. Neurologic manifestations of Schöenlein-Henoch purpura: report of three cases and review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1985;75:687–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gomes RC, Marques VL, Cavalcante EG, Campos LA, Sallum AM, Silva CA, et al. Severe intestinal involvement as initial manifestation of systemic childhood polyarteritis nodosa: report of two cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:425–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chan JC, Williams DM, Roth KS. Kidney failure in infants and children. Pediatr Rev. 2002;23:47–60. doi: 10.1542/pir.23-2-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akcan-Arikan A, Zappitelli M, Loftis LL, Washburn KK, Jefferson LS, Goldstein SL. Modified RIFLE criteria in critically ill children with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1028–1035. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171904. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pacheva IH, Ivanov IS, Stefanova K, Chepisheva E, Chochkova L, Grozeva D, et al. Central nervous system involvement in Henoch-Schönlein purpura in children and adolescents. Case Rep Pediatr. 2017;2017:5483543–5483543. doi: 10.1155/2017/5483543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Passone CG, Grisi SJ, Farhat SC, Manna TD, Pastorino AC, Alveno RA, et al. Complexity of pediatric chronic disease: cross-sectional study with 16,237 patients followed by multiple medical specialties. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019;38:e2018101–e2018101. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jauhola O, Ronkainen J, Koskimies O, Ala-Houhala M, Arikoski P, Hölttä T, et al. Clinical course of extrarenal symptoms in Henoch-Schönlein purpura: a 6-month prospective study. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:871–876. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.167874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Narin N, Akçoral A, Aslin MI, Elmastas H. Ranitidine administration in Henoch-Schönlein vasculitis. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1995;37:37–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1995.tb03682.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.U.S. Food and Drug Administration [homepage on the Internet] Statement alerting patients and health care professionals of NDMA found in samples of ranitidine. New Hampshire (US): U.S. [[cited 2020 Feb 17]];Food and Drug Administration. 2019 Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-alerting-patients-and-health-care-professionals-ndma-found-samples-ranitidine. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mahase E. FDA recalls ranitidine medicines over potential cancer causing impurity. BMJ. 2019;367:l5832–l5832. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosenblum ND, Winter HS. Steroid effects on the course of abdominal pain in children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Pediatrics. 1987;79:1018–1021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pillebout E, Jamin A, Ayari H, Housset P, Pierre M, Sauvaget V, et al. Biomarkers of IgA vasculitis nephritis in children. PLoS One. 2017;2012:e0188718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Paulista de Pediatria are provided here courtesy of Sociedade De Pediatria De Sao Paulo

RESOURCES