Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257221

H2O2 gel bleaching induces cytotoxicity and pain conduction in dental pulp stem cells via intracellular reactive oxygen species on enamel/dentin disc

Chang Chen 1,#, Xiansheng Huang 2,#, Wenqiang Zhu 2, Chen Ding 2, Piaopiao Huang 2, Rong Li 1,*
Editor: Gianpaolo Papaccio3
PMCID: PMC8432789  PMID: 34506603

Abstract

Background

Bleaching is widely accepted for improving the appearance of discolored teeth; however, patient compliance is affected by bleaching-related complications, especially bleaching sensitivity. This study aimed to investigate the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cytotoxicity and pain conduction activated by experimental tooth bleaching.

Methods

Dental pulp stem cells with or without N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), an ROS scavenger, were cultured on the dentin side of the enamel/dentin disc. Subsequently, 15% (90 min) and 40% (30 min) bleaching gels were painted on the enamel surface. Cell viability, intracellular ROS, Ca2+, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and extracellular ATP levels were evaluated using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, CellROX, fura-3AM fluorescence assay, and ATP measurement kit. The rat incisor model was used to evaluate in vivo effects after 0, 1, 3, 7, and 30 days of bleaching. Changes in gene and protein expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), and Pannexin1 (PANX1) in dental pulp stem cells and pulp tissue were detected through RT-PCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence.

Results

The bleaching gel suppressed dental pulp stem cell viability and extracellular ATP levels and increased intracellular ROS, Ca2+, and intracellular ATP levels. The mRNA and protein expression of IL-6, TNFα, TRPA1, and PANX1 were up-regulated in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the 40% gel had a stronger effect than the 15% gel, and NAC ameliorated the gel effects.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that bleaching gels induce cytotoxicity and pain conduction in dental pulp stem cells via intracellular ROS, which may provide a potential therapeutic target for alleviating tooth bleaching nociception.

Introduction

Given the increasing popularity of esthetic procedures, tooth bleaching is among the most widely performed treatments to achieve a pleasing appearance [1]. Although tooth bleaching allows an aesthetically pleasing smile, bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (bleaching sensitivity [BS]) remains its most common clinical side effect, affecting >70% of the patients [2, 3]. BS can occasionally cause painful or uncomfortable sensations, which affects the patient’s satisfaction with the bleaching experience; moreover, severe BS can lead to treatment discontinuation [4].

The mechanisms underlying BS remain unclear. It has been suggested that BS may be associated with bleaching products [5], which are generally based on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or carbamide peroxide with concentrations between 3% and 40% [6]. H2O2 can penetrate the enamel and dentin tubules to reach the pulp, leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which decreases cellularity and cellular metabolism, alters vascular permeability, and even causes tissue necrosis [7, 8]. Hence, activation of dental pulp inflammation and oxidative stress may be involved in tingling/shooting pain without provoking stimuli during or after tooth bleaching.

Many recent studies have shown that H2O2-induced pain is associated with the transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) [9, 10]. TRPA1 is a nonselective cation channel that is primarily expressed in nociceptive neurons and can be activated by noxious cold, ROS, and mechanical stimuli [1113]. Increasing evidence has shown that TRPA1 is activated by various oxidizing compounds, including H2O2, and causes pain [10, 14]. Moreover, it was recently reported that TRPA1 activates nociceptors in dissociated vagal neurons and peripheral terminals of bronchopulmonary vagal afferents, which can be mediated by ROS [14, 15]. These novel findings are indicative of the role of ROS and TRPA1 in nociceptor activation under high H2O2 concentrations.

Ca2+ influx mediated by the Ca2+ channel (including TRPA1) is critical in nerve excitement generation and conduction. It not only causes the fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic membrane to release neurotransmitters but also acts as a second messenger for regulating the activity of intracellular enzymes and non-enzymatic proteins. Further, it is involved in regulating cell signal transduction by altering intracellular ion levels [16]. Neural pain occurrence and conduction are closely associated with the gap junction hemichannel protein, Pannexin1 (PANX1); moreover, Ca2+ influx leads to PANX1 activation [17]. Consequently, it promotes the production and release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [18], an important neurotransmitter that activates the purinergic receptor P2X of central or peripheral nerve cells, induces nerve cell membrane depolarization, excites sensory neurons, and is involved in pain generation and conduction [19].

However, the mechanism underlying TRPA1 in BS remains unclear. TRPA1 was recently detected in freshly isolated human dental pulp [20, 21], and its expression was increased in pulpal inflammation or injury [20]. We speculated that ROS excite or sensitize pulpal nociceptors, including TRPA1, and cause BS. However, there has been no study on the relationship between the expression and functional significance of TRPA1 and ROS in the dental pulp during bleaching treatment. This study aimed to investigate the cytotoxicity of ROS generated by different H2O2 concentrations on dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), as well as the post-bleaching changes in pain conduction.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Cultured human DPSCs were acquired from premolars freshly extracted for orthodontic treatment (aged 18−24 years), following the protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China. After tooth extraction, the pulp was aseptically and immediately obtained, cut into small pieces (about 1 mm3), and incubated for 24 h in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, 2 mmol/L glutamine; Gibco, NY, USA), which contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, NY, USA) and 200 units/mL of type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, NJ, USA). Next, the liberated cells were cultured in complete DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells at the third passage were used in the follow-up experiment as previously described [22], with a slight modification being that the cells were implanted on the dentin surface of an enamel/dentin disc (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Schematic diagram (A) of the enamel-dentin disc and rat incisor model (B).

Fig 1

Enamel/dentin specimen preparation

Intact premolars were acquired from individuals aged 18−24 years after obtaining consent. Before extraction, the tooth surfaces were cleaned with pumice stone and water using a low-speed handpiece. First, dental crowns were obtained by horizontally sectioning the tooth under the cementoenamel junction using a low-speed diamond saw (Isomet, Buehler, IL, USA). Next, the lingual crowns were removed with a specimen containing an integrated disc of buccal enamel-dentin being maintained. Subsequently, the lingual disc layer was heaped using light-cured resin (Filtek P60, 3M ESPE) to form a bottomless cylinder (Fig 1A). Before the in vitro experiments, all specimens were sterilized using 75% ethanol and ultraviolet light irradiation for 1 h [8].

Experimental design

DPSCs were seeded onto the dentin surface of the disc and added to 24-well plates for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Subsequently, the culture medium was replaced with DMEM without FBS. Next, the enamel/dentin specimen was inverted in wells with the enamel surface exposed above the liquid level; further, the whole enamel surface was exposed to the bleaching gel at 37°C. This study tested two H2O2 concentrations, including a 40% and 15% H2O2 gel (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, UT, USA) [23]. Approximately 0.5 mm thickened gel was spread on the enamel surface [8]. The following groups were used: G1—untreated DPSCs, the negative control group; G2—DPSCs treated with 1 mM N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) for 2 h; G3—DPSCs treated for 90 min with 15% H2O2 gel; G4—DPSCs treated for 90 min with 15% H2O2 gel after pretreatment with 1 mM NAC for 2 h; G5—DPSCs treated for 30 min with 40% H2O2 gel; and G6—DPSCs treated for 30 min with 40% H2O2 gel after pretreatment with 1 mM NAC for 2 h [24, 25]. Immediately after the bleaching process ended, the disc was re-inverted, followed by cell analysis.

Cell identification

DPSC characterization was performed through flow cytometry using specific anti-human antibodies against CD14, CD20, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 (eBioscience, CA, USA) as recommended by the International Society for Cellular Therapy. Additionally, we measured the DPSC multi-differentiation potency toward osteogenesis and adipogenesis. Osteogenesis was induced after culturing cells in osteogenic media (Cyagen, CA, USA) for 25 days. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and calcium-rich deposits with Alizarin Red solution (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). To allow adipogenesis, DPSCs were cultured in adipogenic media (Cyagen, CA, USA) for 14 days. Subsequently, DPSCs were fixed with 4% PFA and neutral lipid-containing cytoplasmic vacuoles with Oil Red O solution (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA).

Cell cytotoxicity analysis

Cell cytotoxicity was measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) (Dojindo, Japan) assay following the manufacturer’s instructions. After bleaching, the DPSCs were implanted in 96-well plates (6 × 103 cells/well) overnight for adherence. After 24 h, cells were gently cleaned using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the medium was replaced using fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% CCK-8. Next, cells were incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer (HEALES, Shenzhen, China) [26].

ROS assay

Oxidative stress was immediately tested after bleaching, using a 5 mM cell-permeant fluorescence probe, 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) (Life Technologies, CA, USA) or 5 μM CellROX (Thermo, MA, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. The culture medium was aspirated and washed using PBS, followed by detection using flow cytometry. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was used for statistical analysis [27].

Real-time PCR

We measured mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), TRPA1, and PANX1 using real-time PCR as previously described [8, 22]. Total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Thermo, MA, USA), followed by reverse transcription to single-stranded cDNA using a HiFiScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. We used TaqMan assays (CWBIO, Beijing, USA) for human genes. Relative expression levels were normalized using the 2-ΔΔct method and housekeeping gene actin. Table 1 shows the primer sequences.

Table 1. Primer sequences.

Gene Forward (5’ to 3’) Reverse (5’ to 3’)
actin ACCCTGAAGTACCCCATCGAG AGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAAC
TNFα GAACCCCGAGTGACAAGCCT TATCTCTCAGCTCCACGCCAT
IL6 GCAATAACCACCCCTGACCCAA GCTACATTTGCCGAAGAGCC
TRPA1 GCATGTTTATTCCCTCACTACCCC ACACAAGGACACATACATAGCCA
PANX1 ACTTGGTTTCCCCGCATGGT GAACAAAGCGCTTCCCTCTGG

Western blotting

Western blotting was performed as previously described [28]. Equal protein amounts were separated through sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a Bio-Rad system and 15% acrylamide gel after dilution with sample buffer. Next, the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using a Bio-Rad system. Subsequently, the membrane was blocked using 10% non-fat dry milk in 25 mM Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.2) and 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) for 2 h, and then incubated with the primary antibody to TRPA1 (1:1000, Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), TNFα (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), IL6 (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), PANX1 (1:2000, Proteintech, IL, USA), and β-actin (1:5000, Proteintech, IL, USA). After washing in TBST, the membrane was incubated using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Proteintech, IL, USA) for 1 h at 37°C. After a final wash, we used enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for signal detection using a WesternBright ECL kit (Advansta, CA, USA).

Intracellular Ca2+ measurements

Ca2+ was fluorometrically loaded using the Ca2+ probe fura-3AM (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). After bleaching, the cells were stained with fura-3AM (5 M) for 20 min at 37°C and analyzed using flow cytometry. MFI was used for statistical analysis.

ATP release

Intracellular and extracellular ATP levels were measured using an ATP Content Assay kit (Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The ATP levels were calculated from the ATP standard curve [19].

Animal experiments

For in vivo experiments, we used 36 male and female 8 weeks old Sprague Dawley rats with a mean weight of 250−350 g after approval by the Ethics Committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China, with three rats as an experimental unit. The rats were cultivated in a standard animal room at 22 ± 1°C, 55 ± 10% humid atmospheres, with a standard light/dark schedule of food and water. Three groups were used: 1) no bleaching gel as control (one experimental unit), 2) 15% bleaching gel for 90 min (five experimental units), and 3) 40% bleaching gel for 30 min (five experimental units). Grouping was done by simple randomization; that is, the samples were numbered sequentially and then grouped. The different groups were kept in separate cages to minimize potential confounders. Bleaching gel (0.01 mL) was smeared onto the incisor surface following the manufacturer’s instructions (Fig 1B). At 0, 1, 3, 7, and 30 days of bleaching, experimental rats (n = 3) and a control group were anesthetized with pentobarbital (80 mg/kg) to observe the effect of bleaching on the pulp tissue at different times; subsequently, they were sacrificed. The incisor was fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h; subsequently, it was demineralized in 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution for 3 months. Next, the samples were embedded in paraffin. Three-micrometer sections were obtained from the specimens, followed by analysis using standard hematoxylin and eosin staining for routine histopathological assay. Nine rats were used in each experiment, a total of 33 rats were used in the experiment, and three rats were spared. No rats died, and there were no exclusions. This experiment used a three-blind method; that is, bleaching, sampling and slicing, and data analyses were completed by different personnel.

Immunofluorescence

Dewaxed slices were treated with 0.1% H2O2 and 1 mg/mL trypsin for 15 min and 30 min, respectively. After incubation with 10% goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, the slices were treated using rabbit polyclonal antibody against TNF-α (Bioss, Beijing, China), IL6 (Proteintech, IL, USA), TRPA1 (Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), and PANX1 (Proteintech, IL, USA) overnight at 4°C. For immunohistochemistry, the slices were treated using CoraLite488–conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (Proteintech, IL, USA) and cleaned with PBS. For nuclear staining, we used DAPI at room temperature for 5 min.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and unpaired Student’s t-tests. Graphs were drawn using Graphpad Prism 6.0. All levels of statistical significance were set at P<0.05.

Results

DPSC characterization

Flow cytometry showed that DPSCs were positive for CD73, CD90, and CD105 and negative for CD14, CD20, CD34, and CD45 (Fig 2A). Moreover, DPSCs showed apparent alizarin red-stained mineralized nodules (Fig 2B) and oil red O-stained lipid clusters (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. Identification of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs).

Fig 2

Flow-cytometry (A) illustrates the immunophenotypic characteristics of human DPSCs. Human DPSCs were positive for cell surface antigens CD73, CD90, and CD105, as well as negative for CD14, CD20, CD34, and CD45. DPSCs were cultured under osteogenic (B, 14 days) or adipogenic (C, 21 days) conditions and showed mineralized nodules and lipid clusters as revealed by alizarin red and oil red staining, respectively. Scale bar = 400 (B) or 100 (C) μm.

Forty percent bleaching gel displayed higher ROS-mediated cytotoxicity

The CCK-8 assay was used to test the cytotoxicity at different bleaching gel concentrations and the role of ROS (Fig 3A and 3B). Bleaching gel significantly suppressed DPSC viability; further, compared with 15% gel, 40% gel exerted a stronger inhibiting effect. The addition of NAC, which is an ROS scavenger, partly improved the cell viability proportionally to the inhibition degree. Subsequently, we performed quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) (Fig 3C) and western blotting (Fig 3D) to determine the expression levels of IL-6 and TNFα as representative inflammatory cytokines, which revealed an analogous between-group variance.

Fig 3. 40% bleaching gel displays higher ROS-mediated cytotoxicity.

Fig 3

After bleaching using 40% and 15% H2O2 gel for 30 min and 90 min, respectively, through the enamel/dentin disc, cell viability (A) and inhibition rate (B) were detected using the CCK-8 assay. Compared with the 15% gel, the 40% gel showed stronger viability inhibition, which was reverted partly by adding NAC (an ROS scavenger). The between-group differences in mRNA (C) and protein (D) expression of inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNFα were consistent with the viability findings. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. IL-6, interleukin 6; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

ROS mediate pain conduction in DPSCs caused by the bleaching gel

To probe the pain conduction effect of bleaching gel, we examined intracellular levels of ROS, Ca2+, and ATP; further, we used the MFI to calculate the diversity. We found that bleaching gel led to a dose-dependent increase in ROS (Fig 4A–4D) and Ca2+ levels (Fig 4E and 4F) in DPSCs. Moreover, this increase was attenuated by NAC. Similar changes occurred in the Ca2+ inflow channel TRPA1 and ATP excretion channel PANX1 (Fig 4I and 4J). Notably, the extracellular ATP levels (Fig 4G) were different from the intracellular ATP levels (Fig 4H), which could be attributed to H2O2 hydrolysis in the gel on ATP and could have affected the accuracy of the results.

Fig 4. ROS mediate pain conduction in DPSCs caused by the bleaching gel.

Fig 4

Cells underwent different treatments, and intracellular ROS (A, B by H2DCFDA and C, D by CellROX) and Ca2+ (E, F) were measured using flow cytometry. Mean fluorescence intensity was used to quantify between-group differences. The bleaching gel increased intracellular ROS and Ca2+, with the 40% gel exerting a more intense effect; NAC weakened this trend. Intracellular and extracellular ATP (G, H) levels were detected using the ATP Assay Kit, which revealed that they completely differed. The pain conduction critical tunnel TRPA1 and PANX1 expression levels of mRNA and protein measured by qRT-PCR (I) and western blotting (J) displayed a homologous drift. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; DPSC, dental pulp stem cell; NAC, N-acetyl-L-cysteine; PANX1, Pannexin1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction; TRPA1, transient receptor potential ankyrin 1.

Histological analysis

Bleaching gel was placed on the labial surfaces of rat incisors for 30 min (40% gel) and 90 min (15% gel); subsequently, the teeth were visualized using HE staining (Fig 5) after 0, 1, 4, 7, and 30 days. The control group showed an integrated pulp surrounded by continuous odontoblastic layers and predentin. Contrastingly, the bleaching groups showed more and expanded vessels. Furthermore, specimens in the 40% gel group revealed some interspace, which was considered as necrosis.

Fig 5. HE staining of rat incisors after gel bleaching.

Fig 5

Rat incisors were bleached with the 15% or 40% gel for 90 or 30 min, respectively. After 0, 1, 3, 7, and 30 days, HE staining was used to analyze histological changes. White arrowhead, predentin layer; black arrowhead, odontoblastic layer; white asterisks, vessels; black asterisks, necrotic areas. HE, hematoxylin and eosin.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Furthermore, we used fluorescent immunohistochemistry to determine changes in protein expression of IL-6 (Fig 6A), TNFα (Fig 6B), PANX1 (Fig 7A), and TRPA1 (Fig 7B) in rat incisor pulp tissue. Consistent with in vitro results, bleaching significantly increased the expression of the four proteins, with 40% gel showing more intense fluorescence. The increased protein expression was persistent until day 7 and decayed at day 30.

Fig 6. Immunofluorescence staining of IL-6 and TNFα in the rat incisor after gel bleaching.

Fig 6

The rat incisors were bleached using the 15% or 40% gel for 90 and 30 min, respectively. After 0, 1, 3, 7, and 30 days, immunofluorescence staining was used to detect IL-6 and TNFα levels in the incisor pulp. The nuclei shown in blue were stained using DAPI. Bar = 100 μm. IL-6, interleukin 6; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Fig 7. Immunofluorescence staining of PANX1 and TRPA1 in rat incisors after gel bleaching.

Fig 7

Rat incisors were bleached using 15% or 40% gel for 90 or 30 min, respectively. After 0, 1, 3, 7, and 30 days, immunofluorescence staining was used to detected PANX1 and TRPA1 in the incisor pulp. The nuclei shown in blue were stained by DAPI. Bar = 100 μm. PANX1, Pannexin1; TRPA1, transient receptor potential ankyrin 1.

Discussion

Many patients undergoing tooth-bleaching therapy present with BS, ranging from moderately severe to intolerable; therefore, there has been increasing research on the mechanisms underlying BS. This is the first study on the possible role of ROS in BS. We constructed an artificial pulp chamber as previously reported [29], with an intact human enamel-dentin block with cells attached to the dentin surface (Fig 1A). Commonly used clinical bleaching methods include in-office (40% H2O2 for 30 min) and home bleaching (15% H2O2 for 90 min), which were compared in this study.

As a progenitor population of cells that can differentiate into most cell lineages of the dental pulp tissues (odontoblast-like cells, osteoblasts-like cells, chondrocytes, skeletal muscle cells, and adipocytes) [30], DPSCs are very representative to be the ideal in vitro cell model for cytotoxic studies [31]. Its potential differentiation ability plays an important role in the process of inflammation, repair, cell necrosis, and regeneration of dental pulp tissue [32]. Consistently with previous reports [33, 34], DPSCs exhibited multi-directional differentiation ability (adipogenesis and osteogenesis) and have strong expression of stem cell surface markers (CD73, CD90, and CD105). Moreover, cultured cells were also measured by other hematopoietic markers (CD14, CD20, CD34, and CD45) to rule out the possibility that it contains hematopoietic stem cells.

There is accumulating evidence suggesting that medium ROS levels are crucial in physiological cellular processes; further, high ROS levels induce oxidative stress [35]. Increased ROS levels could be involved in inflammation and pain [36, 37]. H2O2, the most stable and common ROS form, is widely used to establish cell injury, which is directly related to the ROS concentration in the bleaching gel and the application time to enamel [38]. Using a fluorescence assay with H2DCFDA and CellROX, we observed high ROS levels immediately after bleaching (Fig 4A and 4C), indicating that the cultured cells in contact with ROS were under oxidative stress. Furthermore, the oxidative stress intensity was directly related to the H2O2 concentration in contact with cells.

In the physiological state, there is a balance between ROS production and neutralization by antioxidant systems [27]. Disturbance of this balance results in oxidative stress. In severe cases, cell components undergo oxidative damage, which eventually compromises cell viability [39]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that DPSCs are highly sensitive to damage by H2O2 [23, 27]. We found that compared with 15% H2O2 gel and the control group, 40% H2O2 gel significantly decreased DPSC viability. NAC reduced this cytotoxicity, which further demonstrates that the gel caused cell death via ROS.

There is an association between dental pain and inflammation [40]. High-concentration bleaching gels (35–38%) smeared on rat or human teeth have been shown to cause inflammation associated with local tissue necrosis in the pulp [41, 42]. Haug et al. reported that acute dental pain caused by pulpal inflammation was positively associated with IL levels; moreover, IL-6 levels and inflammation in the pulp region could react in regions remote from the disease site [43]. Hall et al. showed that TNFα promoted inflammation and caused pain hypersensitivity in nociceptors, leading to inflammation pain similar to that in pulpitis alone [44]. Our findings indicate that bleaching gel can boost mRNA and protein expression of TNFα and IL6 in vitro and in vivo. Notably, expression of these molecules was positively correlated with intracellular ROS levels and was decreased by NAC, which is indicative of the key role of ROS in dental pain caused by the bleaching gel.

Previous studies have shown that ROS evoke pain and/or defensive reflexes in a largely TRPA1-dependent manner [15, 45]. TRPA1 acts as a nonselective cation channel induced by endogenous ROS; moreover, studies have demonstrated that TRPA1 contributes to hyperalgesia in inflammatory pain models activated by oxidizing agents [9, 10, 46]. Consistent with a previous report, we observed TRPA1 expression in DPSCs and dental pulp. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying bleaching gel-induced pain, we conducted further experiments. Consequently, we observed a post-bleaching increase in Ca2+, intracellular ATP, and PANX1 expression, which was weakened by NAC and was consistent with our hypothesis. Notably, there were differences between extracellular and intracellular ATP levels, as well as PANX1 expression. We suggest that excessive extracellular H2O2 levels in the medium of the in vitro model (Fig 1A) could cause ATP hydrolysis, and therefore reduces its extracellular levels, which is consistent with previous findings [47]. Taken together, we confirmed that bleaching gels can cause pain transmission of DPSCs through intracellular ROS. Additionally, using a rat model, we observed similar in vivo and in vitro protein expression of IL-6, TNFα, PANX1, and TRPA1. We also observed necrotic-like areas in the 40% gel bleaching group.

Bleaching gels cause dental pulp inflammation; moreover, high-concentration bleaching gels stimulate the dental pulp to a greater extent, increasing the probability of developing teeth sensitivity. Therefore, we chose a slightly lower bleach concentration in the clinical treatment.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, it can be concluded that tooth bleaching products can produce severe oxidative stress on pulp cells, which results in intense DPSC cytotoxicity. Notably, high oxidative stress greatly induced pain conduction, including up-regulated TRPA1 expression and mediating Ca2+ influx and ATP release into the extracellular space. This new finding contributes toward the elucidation of mechanisms underlying BS, where the strong oxidative stress on DPSCs caused by bleaching products may subsequently up-regulate TRPA1 cation channels and stimulate adjacent sensory pulp nerve fibers. This may provide a potential therapeutic target for alleviation of tooth bleaching nociception.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Uncropped western original image.

(A) PANX1. (B) TNFα. (C) TRPA1. (D) β-actin. (E) IL-6.

(TIF)

S1 Checklist. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Author checklist.

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81700999 and 81974281) and Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Nos. 2018JJ3741 and 2020JJ2052).

References

  • 1.Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20(2):195–200. Epub 2009/06/26. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52902 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hewlett ER. Etiology and management of whitening-induced tooth hypersensitivity. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35(7):499–506. Epub 2007/10/06. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kothari S, Gray AR, Lyons K, Tan XW, Brunton PA. Vital bleaching and oral-health-related quality of life in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:22–9. Epub 2019/03/25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Costa R, Moraes S, Lemos C, SoutoMaior JR, Vasconcelos BDE, Pellizzer EP. Effect of Analgesic Drugs on Tooth Sensitivity Induced by In-office Dental Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2019. Epub 2019/11/22. doi: 10.2341/18-250-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaz MM, Lopes LG, Cardoso PC, Souza JB, Batista AC, Costa NL, et al. Inflammatory response of human dental pulp to at-home and in-office tooth bleaching. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(5):509–17. Epub 2016/11/05. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720160137 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rodrigues FT, Serro AP, Polido M, Ramalho A, Figueiredo-Pina CG. Effect of bleaching teeth with hydrogen peroxide on the morphology, hydrophilicity, and mechanical and tribological properties of the enamel. Wear. 2017;374–375:21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Benetti F, Gomes-Filho JE, Ferreira LL, Ervolino E, Briso ALF, Sivieri-Araujo G, et al. Hydrogen peroxide induces cell proliferation and apoptosis in pulp of rats after dental bleaching in vivo: Effects of the dental bleaching in pulp. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;81:103–9. Epub 2017/05/14. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.04.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soares DG, Basso FG, Scheffel DS, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Responses of human dental pulp cells after application of a low-concentration bleaching gel to enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(9):1428–36. Epub 2015/07/15. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.06.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang S, Brigoli B, Lim J, Karley A, Chung MK. Roles of TRPV1 and TRPA1 in Spontaneous Pain from Inflamed Masseter Muscle. Neuroscience. 2018;384:290–9. Epub 2018/06/12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.048 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Trevisan G, Hoffmeister C, Rossato MF, Oliveira SM, Silva MA, Silva CR, et al. TRPA1 receptor stimulation by hydrogen peroxide is critical to trigger hyperalgesia and inflammation in a model of acute gout. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;72:200–9. Epub 2014/05/02. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.04.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Julius D. TRP channels and pain. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:355–84. Epub 2013/10/09. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155833 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun W, Wang Z, Cao J, Cui H, Ma Z. Cold stress increases reactive oxygen species formation via TRPA1 activation in A549 cells. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2016;21(2):367–72. Epub 2015/12/05. doi: 10.1007/s12192-015-0663-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Viana F. TRPA1 channels: molecular sentinels of cellular stress and tissue damage. J Physiol. 2016;594(15):4151–69. Epub 2016/04/16. doi: 10.1113/JP270935 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Andersson DA, Gentry C, Moss S, Bevan S. Transient receptor potential A1 is a sensory receptor for multiple products of oxidative stress. J Neurosci. 2008;28(10):2485–94. Epub 2008/03/07. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5369-07.2008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stanford KR, Hadley SH, Barannikov I, Ajmo JM, Bahia PK, Taylor-Clark TE. Antimycin A-induced mitochondrial dysfunction activates vagal sensory neurons via ROS-dependent activation of TRPA1 and ROS-independent activation of TRPV1. Brain Res. 2019;1715:94–105. Epub 2019/03/28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.03.029 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang P, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhu L, Yin D, Zeng X, et al. The activation effect of hainantoxin-I, a peptide toxin from the Chinese spider, Ornithoctonus hainana, on intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(8):2568–79. Epub 2014/08/26. doi: 10.3390/toxins6082568 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bravo D, Ibarra P, Retamal J, Pelissier T, Laurido C, Hernandez A, et al. Pannexin 1: a novel participant in neuropathic pain signaling in the rat spinal cord. Pain. 2014;155(10):2108–15. Epub 2014/08/08. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bravo D, Maturana CJ, Pelissier T, Hernandez A, Constandil L. Interactions of pannexin 1 with NMDA and P2X7 receptors in central nervous system pathologies: Possible role on chronic pain. Pharmacol Res. 2015;101:86–93. Epub 2015/07/28. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.07.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schiavuzzo JG, Teixeira JM, Melo B, da Silva dos Santos DF, Jorge CO, Oliveira-Fusaro MC, et al. Muscle hyperalgesia induced by peripheral P2X3 receptors is modulated by inflammatory mediators. Neuroscience. 2015;285:24–33. Epub 2014/12/03. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim YS, Jung HK, Kwon TK, Kim CS, Cho JH, Ahn DK, et al. Expression of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 in human dental pulp. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1087–92. Epub 2012/07/17. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.El Karim IA, Linden GJ, Curtis TM, About I, McGahon MK, Irwin CR, et al. Human dental pulp fibroblasts express the "cold-sensing" transient receptor potential channels TRPA1 and TRPM8. J Endod. 2011;37(4):473–8. Epub 2011/03/23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Soares DG, Basso FG, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Concentrations of and application protocols for hydrogen peroxide bleaching gels: effects on pulp cell viability and whitening efficacy. J Dent. 2014;42(2):185–98. Epub 2013/11/19. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Llena C, Collado-Gonzalez M, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Martinez CM, Moraleda JM, et al. Comparison of diffusion, cytotoxicity and tissue inflammatory reactions of four commercial bleaching products against human dental pulp stem cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7743. Epub 2019/05/28. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44223-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Debeljak Martacic J, Borozan S, Radovanovic A, Popadic D, Mojsilovic S, Vucic V, et al. N-Acetyl-l-cysteine enhances ex-vivo amplification of deciduous teeth dental pulp stem cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;70:32–8. Epub 2016/06/19. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.06.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Diomede F, Marconi GD, Guarnieri S, D’Attilio M, Cavalcanti M, Mariggio MA, et al. A Novel Role of Ascorbic Acid in Anti-Inflammatory Pathway and ROS Generation in HEMA Treated Dental Pulp Stem Cells. Materials (Basel). 2019;13(1). Epub 2020/01/02. doi: 10.3390/ma13010130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Deng Q, Liu Q, Zhang H, Fan W, Li J, Kang J, et al. Melatonin enhances hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in human dental pulp cells. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Soares DG, Goncalves Basso F, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Effect of hydrogen-peroxide-mediated oxidative stress on human dental pulp cells. J Dent. 2015;43(6):750–6. Epub 2014/12/21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chew JRJ, Chuah SJ, Teo KYW, Zhang S, Lai RC, Fu JH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes enhance periodontal ligament cell functions and promote periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;89:252–64. Epub 2019/03/18. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Soares DG, Ribeiro AP, da Silveira Vargas F, Hebling J, de Souza Costa CA. Efficacy and cytotoxicity of a bleaching gel after short application times on dental enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(8):1901–9. Epub 2012/12/12. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0883-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pecci-Lloret MP, Vera-Sanchez M, Aznar-Cervantes S, Garcia-Bernal D, Sanchez RO, Pecci-Lloret MR, et al. Analysis of the Adherence of Dental Pulp Stem Cells on Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(4):939–43. Epub 2017/02/24. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003596 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xie H, Chua M, Islam I, Bentini R, Cao T, Viana-Gomes JC, et al. CVD-grown monolayer graphene induces osteogenic but not odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. Dent Mater. 2017;33(1):e13–e21. Epub 2016/10/04. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hernandez-Monjaraz B, Santiago-Osorio E, Monroy-Garcia A, Ledesma-Martinez E, Mendoza-Nunez VM. Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Dental Origin for Inducing Tissue Regeneration in Periodontitis: A Mini-Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4). Epub 2018/03/23. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ha J, Bharti D, Kang YH, Lee SY, Oh SJ, Kim SB, et al. Human Dental Pulp-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Potential to Differentiate into Smooth Muscle-Like Cells In Vitro. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:8858412. Epub 2021/02/09. doi: 10.1155/2021/8858412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perczel-Kovach K, Hegedus O, Foldes A, Sangngoen T, Kallo K, Steward MC, et al. STRO-1 positive cell expansion during osteogenic differentiation: A comparative study of three mesenchymal stem cell types of dental origin. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;122:104995. Epub 2020/12/06. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Colli M, Zara S, di Giacomo V, Patruno A, Marconi GD, Gallorini M, et al. Nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxic effect induced by zoledronic acid treatment on human gingival fibroblasts. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1269–77. Epub 2014/10/30. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1344-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Y, Xiao JF, Yang HF, Jiao Y, Cao WW, Shi HM, et al. N-Acetyl Cysteine as a Novel Polymethyl Methacrylate Resin Component: Protection against Cell Apoptosis and Genotoxicity. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:1301736. Epub 2019/10/23. doi: 10.1155/2019/1301736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sugiyama D, Kang S, Arpey N, Arunakul P, Usachev YM, Brennan TJ. Hydrogen Peroxide Induces Muscle Nociception via Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 Receptors. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(4):695–708. Epub 2017/06/24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001756 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486–541. Epub 2018/01/25. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sinha K, Das J, Pal PB, Sil PC. Oxidative stress: the mitochondria-dependent and mitochondria-independent pathways of apoptosis. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87(7):1157–80. Epub 2013/04/02. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1034-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim S. Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in health and inflammation. J Endod. 1990;16(2):48–53. Epub 1990/02/01. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81563-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cintra LT, Benetti F, da Silva Facundo AC, Ferreira LL, Gomes-Filho JE, Ervolino E, et al. The number of bleaching sessions influences pulp tissue damage in rat teeth. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1576–80. Epub 2013/11/19. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Costa CA, Riehl H, Kina JF, Sacono NT, Hebling J. Human pulp responses to in-office tooth bleaching. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(4):e59–64. Epub 2010/03/23. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haug SR, Marthinussen MC. Acute Dental Pain and Salivary Biomarkers for Stress and Inflammation in Patients with Pulpal or Periapical Inflammation. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019;33(2):227–33. Epub 2018/10/12. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hall BE, Zhang L, Sun ZJ, Utreras E, Prochazkova M, Cho A, et al. Conditional TNF-alpha Overexpression in the Tooth and Alveolar Bone Results in Painful Pulpitis and Osteitis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(2):188–95. Epub 2015/10/28. doi: 10.1177/0022034515612022 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bautista DM, Jordt SE, Nikai T, Tsuruda PR, Read AJ, Poblete J, et al. TRPA1 mediates the inflammatory actions of environmental irritants and proalgesic agents. Cell. 2006;124(6):1269–82. Epub 2006/03/28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jiang L, Ma D, Grubb BD, Wang M. ROS/TRPA1/CGRP signaling mediates cortical spreading depression. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):25. Epub 2019/03/08. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0978-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shi Y, Tang M, Sun C, Pan Y, Liu L, Long Y, et al. ATP Mimics pH-Dependent Dual Peroxidase-Catalase Activities Driving H2O2 Decomposition. CCS Chemistry. 2019;1(4):373–83. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.019.20190017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gianpaolo Papaccio

13 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-18951

H2O2 gel bleaching induces cytotoxicity and pain conduction in dental pulp stem cells via intracellular reactive oxygen species on enamel/dentin disc

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. li,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Although of some interest the paper needs to be amended in some parts and requires additional experiments as specified by myself and by a referee (see for specific requirements).

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 27 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gianpaolo Papaccio, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Authors have evaluated the effects of blenching gels on DPSCs both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating that increased ROS production in dental pulp cells lead to injuries.

The paper has some interest and although the experiments are well conducted several amendments are needed.

Introduction section is excessive and requires to be shortened.

More experiments are needed in order to evaluate ROS production in DPSCs as the Cell-Rox assays

In vivo evaluation of dental pulp after blenching treatments must be done at longer times also at longer times.

As in other papers (see BioMed Research International, 2021; Comprehensive Biomaterials, 2011) the Authors must emphasise the role of DPSCs.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. As part of your revisions, please update your Methods section to address the following: (1) the number of animals in each group and how you determined the sample size; (2) the sex and strain of the rats; (3) all anesthetics and analgesics administered to animals during your study (name of drug, dosage, frequency and route of administration); (4) details about monitoring parameters & humane endpoints for any animals who became severely ill during the study; (5) the rate of mortality during the study and the cause of death (if applicable); (6) lastly, please complete and submit the ARRIVE Guidelines checklist (Essential 10 version): https://arriveguidelines.org/resources/author-checklists.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this paper Authors evaluated the effect of blenching gels on DPSCs both in vitro and in vivo and demonstrated that the main complications are due to increased ROS production in dental pulp cells.

The paper is interesting and the experiments are well conducted.

Some changes are needed.

Introduction section should be reduced.

Authors should add other experiments to evaluate ROS production in DPSCs (Cell-Rox assay).

Evaluation of in vivo dental pulp after blenching treatments should be made also at longer times (up to 30 days).

In discussion section Authors should emphasize the role of DPSCs (BioMed Research International, 2021; Comprehensive Biomaterials, 2011)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257221.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Aug 2021

For journal requirements:

1. We have modified the our manuscript according to PLOS ONE's style requirements.

2. We have added information on animal experiments as required and submitted the ARRIVE Guidelines checklist.

3. We apologize for using the western image that was acquired after cutting the membrane. In order to provide the entire original image without trimming, we repeated the western experiment and updated the blots of Figures 3 and 4. The original picture is shown in the additional material Figure s1.

4. We have linked ORCID iD in the revision.

Responses to the reviewers’ comments:

1. Introduction section should be reduced.

Response: Thank you for your careful review. In order to shorten the length of the introduction section, we have reduced the word count from 632 to 517.

2. Authors should add other experiments to evaluate ROS production in DPSCs (Cell-Rox assay).

Response: Thank you for your comment. We have added the Cell-Rox assay (Fig 4C and D). (line 165)

3. Evaluation of in vivo dental pulp after blenching treatments should be made also at longer times (up to 30 days).

Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We have added 30 days result in the revised manuscript (Figures 5, 6, and 7).

4. In discussion section Authors should emphasize the role of DPSCs (BioMed Research International, 2021; Comprehensive Biomaterials, 2011)

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have added the role of DPSCs in the second paragraph of the discussion section. (lines 361-371)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Gianpaolo Papaccio

26 Aug 2021

H2O2 gel bleaching induces cytotoxicity and pain conduction in dental pulp stem cells via intracellular reactive oxygen species on enamel/dentin disc

PONE-D-21-18951R1

Dear Dr. li,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gianpaolo Papaccio, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The Authors have addressed the previous comments.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Gianpaolo Papaccio

1 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-18951R1

H2O2 gel bleaching induces cytotoxicity and pain conduction in dental pulp stem cells via intracellular reactive oxygen species on enamel/dentin disc

Dear Dr. Li:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Gianpaolo Papaccio

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Uncropped western original image.

    (A) PANX1. (B) TNFα. (C) TRPA1. (D) β-actin. (E) IL-6.

    (TIF)

    S1 Checklist. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Author checklist.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES