Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257206

Dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib act as significant allosteric modulator for dengue NS3 protease

R V Sriram Uday 1,#, Rajdip Misra 2,#, Annaram Harika 1, Sandip Dolui 2, Achintya Saha 3, Uttam Pal 2,¤,*, V Ravichandiran 1,*, Nakul C Maiti 2,*
Editor: Keivan Zandi4
PMCID: PMC8432871  PMID: 34506566

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) encodes a unique protease (NS3/NS2B) essential for its maturation and infectivity and, it has become a key target for anti-viral drug design to treat dengue and other flavivirus related infections. Present investigation established that some of the drug molecules currently used mainly in cancer treatment are susceptible to bind non-active site (allosteric site/ cavity) of the NS3 protease enzyme of dengue virus. Computational screening and molecular docking analysis found that dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib can bind at the allosteric site of the enzyme. The binding of the molecules to the allosteric site found to be stabilized via pi-cation and hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen-bond formation and π-stacking interaction with the molecules. Several interacting residues of the enzyme were common in all the five serotypes. However, the interaction/stabilizing forces were not uniformly distributed; the π-stacking was dominated with DENV3 proteases, whereas, a charged/ionic interaction was the major force behind interaction with DENV2 type proteases. In the allosteric cavity of protease from DENV1, the residues Lys73, Lys74, Thr118, Glu120, Val123, Asn152 and Ala164 were involved in active interaction with the three molecules (dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib). Molecular dynamics (MD) analysis further revealed that the molecules on binding to NS3 protease caused significant changes in structural fluctuation and gained enhanced stability. Most importantly, the binding of the molecules effectively perturbed the protein conformation. These changes in the protein conformation and dynamics could generate allosteric modulation and thus may attenuate/alter the NS3 protease functionality and mobility at the active site. Experimental studies may strengthen the notion whether the binding reduce/enhance the catalytic activity of the enzyme, however, it is beyond the scope of this study.

Introduction

Dengue virus (DENV) is a mosquito-borne human pathogen that causes dengue fever, dengue shock syndrome (DSS) and dengue hemorrhagic disease (DHD). The virus is of ~50-nm diameter, enveloped with a lipid membrane [1, 2]. The virus comes under the family of flaviviridae, genus of flavivirus and species Dengue virus [3]. There are four different serotypes of Dengue virus, namely DENV1, DEVN2, DENV3, and DENV4. Another new variant of DENV4, DENV4T was recently reported in 2013 [4]. The major difference for humans to different dengue types lies in subtle differences in the surface proteins of the different dengue serotypes. Infection induces long-life protection against the infecting serotype; however, it gives only a short time protective immunity against the other types. The primary infection causes minor disease, but secondary infections have been reported to cause severe diseases such as dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS) in both children and adults [5]. The recent survey estimated that about 390 million-dengue infections occur every year across the world [6].https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?0uROhO However, a successful drug is yet to come out for the proper treatment of these diseases.

A significant effort is undergoing for the development of antiviral drugs for the cure of the disease. Two general strategies are often pursued for any antiviral therapy. The first is to inhibit viral targets; such an approach has generated most of the direct acting antivirals currently in clinical use. The second is to inhibit host targets. Two types of host targets could be pursued: (i) host factors that are essential for viral replication and (ii) host targets that participate in the development of disease symptoms [7]. Unfortunately, the molecular details of host pathways that lead to dengue fever are not well defined; therefore, the feasibility of such an approach remains low at this time and the major focus is on viral proteins and RNA molecules. The dengue viral RNA is an 11 kb long single stranded positively sense RNA which after translation synthesizes a single polyprotein chain. The polyprotein chain consists of three structural (capsid, membrane, envelope) and seven non-structural (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5) proteins. In the polyprotein precursor molecule these proteins are arranged in a specific manner viz. NH2– C-PrM-E-NS1-NS2A-NS2B-NS3-NS4A-NS4B-NS5-COOH [7, 8]. The structural proteins are associated with the construction of viral particle whereas the non-structural proteins mainly help in the viral RNA replication, assembly of virions as well as in the post translational processing.

Based on the dengue life cycle, one of the current drug targets in dengue drug discovery involves two main non-structural proteins NS3 and NS5 (Scheme 1) [9]. NS3 functions as protease and helicase, whereas NS5 is the RNA dependent RNA polymerase, in charge of viral RNA replication [10, 11]. Nonstructural protein 3(NS3) protease, coupled with cofactor NS2, is very essential for the replication process of the virus and it performs the task of post translational cleavage of the viral poly protein. Thus NS3 becomes an attractive target for anti-viral drug design. Several attempts has been made to develop small molecules as protease inhibitors targeting the NS3 active site [1214]. However, the success rate was very limited and most of the inhibitors are peptide based. The active site of dengue NS3 protease is flat and it makes specific binding of a small molecule insignificant. Moreover, it binds preferentially substrates with basic subunits. Therefore, the inhibitors that bind another region of the protease and not at the NS3 active site appeared to be a better approach to design inhibitors.

Scheme 1. Graphical representation of different structural and non-structural proteins of Dengue virus. Top panel shows the scheme of the dengue viral polyprotein. C-capsid, prM-Membrane precursors, E-envelope, NS2B-Co-factor of NS3, NS3-Serine Protease and Helicase, NS5-RNA dependant RNA polymerase, Methyl Transferase. Lower panel shows the NS3 Protein with proteases and helicase parts. Active site of the protease is marked.

graphic file with name pone.0257206.e001.jpg

Earlier investigations suggested that the dengue virus protease family is susceptible to allosteric inhibition [1518] and some of inhibitory antibodies utilize allosteric mechanisms in the inhibition processes of proteases. Wu et al. suggested diaryl-(thio)-ethers as candidates for a novel class of protease inhibitors [19]. They also proposed that these molecules participate in selective and non-competitive inhibition of the DENV2 and DENV3 cells by benzothiazole derivatives exhibiting IC50 values in the low micro molar range. Othman et al. found that group of flavanones and their chalcones, isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda L, can have varying degrees of noncompetitive inhibitory activities toward DENV2 protease [20]. Results obtained from automated docking studies are in agreement with experimental data in which the ligands were shown to bind to sites other than the active site of the protease i.e., allosteric sites. They have calculated Ki values, which are very small, indicating that the ligands bind quite well to the allosteric binding site. Teixeira et al. reviewed on various plants, which are reported to be having anti DENV property [21]. Importance of plant flavonoids on inhibition of dengue virus was also reported by Hassandarvish et.al. The authors identified some flavonoid compounds, namely baicalein and baicalin from Scutellaria baicalensi, which showed promising inhibitory results against dengue viral replication. Allosteric inhibition of NS3 protease could be one of the several possible mechanisms for their antiviral activity as reported by the authors based on their in-silico docking studies [22]. From the concept of allosteric inhibition of enzymes, modern drug discovery also focused on the allosteric targets of the protein because of its more saturability and greater selectivity. The concept is, when the ligand binds to the allosteric site, it brings out some conformational changes in the protein and disables the function of the protein. Several drugs have been developed for various targets, where the inhibition occured through targeting the allosteric sites e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates. Steroids target at allosteric sites of GABA receptor; aspirin, and sodium salicylates target Endothelin A receptors at allosteric sites etc. Allosteric site on the dengue protease was identified by blind docking followed by clustering as described by Pal et al. [23]. The importance of dynamics and fluctuation in the allosteric sites and its impacts on the functional efficacy of proteases in general discussed in previous reports [23, 24]. Upon small-molecule binding to the allosteric sites in the protein undergo a change in conformation or an alteration in the conformational equilibrium that affects the function of the enzyme.

A study [16], reported recently by Lim et.al, shows successful inhibition of dengue NS2B/NS3 protease by means of allosteric modulation. Similar type of approach was also reported earlier where authors have targeted dengue NS2B/NS3 by inhibiting its allosteric cavities [15, 17]. Thus allosteric inhibition of the viral protease stands a viable approach in anti-viral drug development. Therefore, by choosing DENV NS3 as target, we established by in-silico methods three molecules which could bind effectively to NS3, albeit at the allosteric site of the proteases, of all the five serotypes of the virus.

The protease domain in NS3 starts with N-terminal, which extends up to 180 amino acids (Scheme 1). The enzyme consists of 6 β-strands which form two β-barrels with the catalytic triad (His51, Asp75 and Ser135) [11]. Activity of the protease completely depends on the presence of its co-factor, NS2B that is conserved among almost all the flaviviruses. The NS3 protein includes residues 49–66 from the NS2B which were linked to the N-terminus of full-length NS3 by a Gly-Ser linker (Scheme 1). Protease domain is inactive without NS2B as it plays a critical role in proteolytic activation. The central region of NS2B (residues 67–80) interacts with the protease, flanking hydrophobic regions of NS2B are predicted to anchor the NS2B–NS3 complex in the ER membrane [25].

Drug repurposing nowadays is a cleaver tool which allow us to check the concealed potencies of pre-discovered drugs against various diseases. From past literatures we have seen some occasions of drug repurposing based approaches, where repurposed drug has been used to inhibit dengue infections. Yogy Simanjuntak et al. found that prochlorperazine (PCZ), a dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) antagonist approved to treat nausea, vomiting, and headache in humans has potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity against DENV infection [26]. They have targeted viral binding and viral entry through D2R and clathrin-associated mechanisms, which can be blocked by PCZ. However, in most of the scenario the target of the repurposed drugs is non-NS3 regions. In our present investigation we targeted NS3 protease and proceeded with a strategy of drug repurposing as a lot of protease and serine protease inhibitors are available in the market. We compiled a library of drugs for virtual screening, from which leads were identified and subjected for refinements. The molecules dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib are identified as leads from drugs molecules library. The above lead molecules found to bind at the allosteric site of the target proteins of all the virus serotypes. Binding of the molecules to the allosteric site causes some conformational changes, reduces the motion as reflected in fluctuation and indicated possibility of terminating the protein function.

The techniques used in the investigation included molecular docking based virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations. The leads we identified on screening libraries and later subjected to docking refinements and the best hits were subjected to molecular dynamic simulation studies. Molecular dynamics were performed by GROMACS using GROMOS96 53A6 force field with SPC water for 100 ns. Molecular dynamics analysis was made on NS3 (PDB: 3L6P) of serotype type 1 protein docked with three ligands individually. The structural and dynamic behavior of the protein when bound to ligand was monitored for duration of 100 ns. We analyzed structural deviations (RMSD; root mean square deviation), residue-wise fluctuation (RMSF; root mean square fluctuation), flexibility (Rg; radius of gyration), protein-ligand interactions, and secondary structure analysis using DSSP tool. The results so obtained suggested that these molecules were potentially strong allosteric modulators of the NS3 activity and may act as candidates for the treatment of the disease state.

Methods

Multiple sequence alignment

Multiple sequence alignments is used in studies to characterize the proteins families, identify the shared regions of homology etc., in our studies the alignments are done in the Clustal Omega server which is a general purpose multiple sequence alignment program for DNA or proteins [27, 28]. The sequences of the five NS3 protease serotypes were obtained from UniProt KnowledgeBase for the alignment. Percentage identity matrix was also obtained from the alignment.

Selection of protein and small molecules for screening

Three-dimensional structural information about proteins is collected from Protein Data Bank (PDB). 24 crystal structures of different serotypes of dengue NS3 protein were found in PDB, from which best 13 crystal structures are selected for our studies that contained the protease domain. Small molecules are chosen from a library of small molecules that contains 3D structures of approved drugs of categories like protease inhibitors, ATP Kinase inhibitors etc. From this library by performing virtual screening using PyRX three drug molecules were selected. We selected drug molecules from the library of small molecules that contain 3D structures of approved drugs of various categories like protease inhibitors, ATP kinase inhibitors etc. (S1 Table). The 3D structures are collected from different databases like ChemSpider and PubChem. Some structures are drawn in Avogadro software and geometry optimized performs prior to virtual screening. Subsequently, the molecules are subjected to energy minimization process using the steepest descent followed by conjugate gradient algorithms in UFF force field as implemented in Avogadro. The minimized small molecules, which are saved, converted into a single SDF file format by using open Babel to be imported in PyRx for virtual screening.

Molecular docking

Flexible docking has been used in our studies to see the interactions of small molecules against DENV NS3 protease. The crystal structures were refined using PyMOL as crystal structures consist of other multiple chains, and errors like duplicate residues, and extra molecules like co-crystal ligands, water molecules etc. Water molecules and other ligand molecules were removed. The proteins were subjected to a minimization process. The minimization was carried out individually one by one in PDB_hydro sever, where the protein is minimized and the errors regarding side chain refinement, missing atoms adjustment is carried out. These minimized structures are used in the processes of molecular docking. For docking, AutoDockTools along with AutoDock Vina developed by the Scripps Research Institute has been used in our studies [2931]. Total three molecules are selected as per the cut-off of the virtual screening. The AutoDock graphical interface AutoDockTools was used to add polar hydrogens and compute partial charges (Gasteiger charges) to the proteins and ligands. The search space was included in a box big enough to encompass the whole protein. Grid point spacing was 1.0 Å. An exhaustiveness of 50 was given to improve the quality of evaluation. The best poses have been identified on the basis of free energies and analysis of the interactions has been performed on the docked complexes.

Virtual screening

Virtual screening has been performed in PyRx academic version, which was also developed by the Scripps Research Institute [3236]. The prepared proteins (proteases) and ligands (library of small molecules) are imported into PyRx. The molecules imported are converted to AutoDock PDBQT files. AutoDock Vina as implemented in PyRx was used for the screening. Each protease is docked with the library of molecules at a time. Molecules are sorted according to their binding energies. A cut-off is set up for the molecules according to their free energies obtained from screening and leads were isolated to perform docking refinement studies as described above.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations

MD was performed for type1 protease (PDB: 3L6P) bound with the three best hit molecules (dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib) as shown in Scheme 2 and GROMACS (GROningen Machine for Chemical simulations) was used to perform the MD for duration of 100 ns using GROMOS96 53A6 force field. The lone protein was also subjected to MD simulation as control in order to gain information about the allosteric modulation on comparison with the results on the complexes. Standard protocol was followed for MD simulations [37].

Scheme 2. Chemical structures of the three hit molecules as obtained by virtual screening against DENV protease.

graphic file with name pone.0257206.e002.jpg

Results and discussion

In order to find potential inhibitors that can bind and alter the proteins conformation we performed virtual screening and binding analysis of a library of drug molecules used as medicine for other human diseases as potential repurposed drug for DENV NS3 protease. 24 crystal structures of dengue NS3 protein from four different serotypes were retrieved from the PDB and are listed in S2 Table. Among them, 13 crystal structures contained protease domain (ten of them are composed of only the protease domain, and remaining three (2WZQ, 2VBC, 2WHX) structures are complete NS3 protein with helicase domain as well). The sequence analysis of protease domain of all the proteins (five serotypes) was carried out using Clustal Omega to analyze the conserved and active sites residues. A sequence homology of 67–71% was found between the DENV types 1–4 (Fig 1 and S1 Fig). The percent identity matrix in S1 Fig depicts that the serotype 2 shares an average of 67% homology with other serotypes. Type 4 and type 4T share nearly 99% of homology with each other and an average of 77% homology with the rest of the serotypes. Type 3 and type 1 share 85% of homology with each other and a homology of 78% with the rest of the serotypes.

Fig 1. Multiple sequence alignment of DENV protease from five serotypes with highlighted active site residues.

Fig 1

Vide S1 Fig for percent identity matrix.

To find leads for NS3 protease inhibitors, a total of 175 virtual screening calculations were performed. The lead molecules were identified purely on the basis of binding energy (free energy from docking) obtained from the results of virtual screening (S2 Fig). A cut-off is set up for the molecules to perform further studies. Molecules which showed binding energies less than -9 kcal/mol with almost all serotypes are selected for performing refinement docking to analyze the binding conformation of the ligand in the docked complexes. This lead to identify three drug molecules by screening method as discussed in the material and method sections. A detail docking analysis was carried out with crystal structures of the five proteases (i.e., one from each serotype with PDB IDs 3L6P (type 1), 4M9T (type 2), 3U1J (type 3), 2VBC (type 4), and 2WHX (type 4T)). The molecular crystals were chosen based on their resolution, model geometry and fit model data [24, 38]. Superimposition of the five crystal structures highlighting the active site is shown in (Fig 2). The key active site residues remained conserved throughout the evolution. The structures of the proteases were validated accordingly with the accepted regions as per Ramachandran plot (S3 Fig). The DENV protease also shows an allosteric ligand-binding site. In order to find the binding site, blind docking was performed followed by clustering of the docking results. From the docking we observed that the molecules that showed lowest binding energies did not bind to substrate-binding active site of the protease, instead the molecules favored non-active site on the enzyme. The site of the binding was allosteric site as reported in other studies [15, 16]. The comparison of the binding site across different serotype proteins was also identified and it was in the same region as shown in Fig 3. The best poses were identified on the basis of binding free energy (Table 1). The binding interactions and the affinity of the molecules to the proteases of all five serotypes of the DENV are discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.

Fig 2. Superimposed view of the protease structures from all five serotypes.

Fig 2

The three conserved active site residues, H51, D75 and S135 at the center are shown in stick model and encircled with a black outline. Color key for line models: cyan, type 1 (PDB: 3L6P); brown, type 2 (PDB: 4M9T); violet, type 3 (PDB: 3U1J); red, type 4 (PDB: 2VBC); pink, type 4T (PDB: 2WHX).

Fig 3. Comparison of allosteric sites in DENV protease of different serotypes of dengue in surface representation.

Fig 3

(A-E) Type 1–4 and 4T of DENV protease. The allosteric binding pocket is shown with a circle. Color key: cyan (A), type 1 (PDB: 3L6P); brown (B), type 2 (PDB: 4M9T); violet (C), type 3 (PDB: 3U1J); red (D), type 4 (PDB: 2VBC); pink (E), type 4T (PDB: 2WHX);. (F) Superimposed view (ribbon) of all the five proteases from different serotypes.

Table 1. Flexible docking binding energies of all serotypes of proteins with ligand molecules.

Proteins Binding energies(ΔKcal/mol)
Dabrafenib Idelalisib Nintedanib
Type 1(3L6P) -8.6 -8.6 -8.6
Type 2(4M9T) -9.1 -8.5 -8.3
Type 3(3U1J) -9.2 -8.4 -8.2
Type 4(2VBC) -8.5 -8.2 -8.5
Type 4 Thailand(2WHX) -8.1 -8.4 -8.1

Dabrafenib shows best binding energy for all the five serotypes with lowest binding energy of -9.1 kcal/mole (Fig 4a and Table 1). Dabrafenib, is sold under the brand name of Tafinlar. It is a drug for the treatment of cancers associated with a mutated version of the gene BRAF and it is often used as an inhibitor of the associated enzyme B-Raf, which plays a role in the regulation of cell growth. The molecule preferred the binding at the allosteric site of the DENV protease. Hydrophobic interaction was dominant across all the serotypes. In DENV2 protease, both hydrogen bonding and charged ionic interactions were also observed (Fig 4b). It was known that Lys73, Lys74, Trp83, Gln88, Thr120, Ile123, Gly124, Leu149, Asn152, Ala166, Asn167 in this protease play some key roles in the allosteric inhibition of the active site when binding with ligand by bringing out significant conformational changes and disabling the protein to make its function [39]. In our investigation, it was found that, residues Lys73, Lys74, Thr118, Glu120, Val123, Asn152 and Ala164 of the DENV1 protease significantly interact with all three molecules. These residues may perform a key role in allosteric modulation of DNV NS3 protease (Table 2). Further, we compared the interacting residues of allosteric sites of different dengue serotypes with dabrafenib molecule. We found that Lys73 and Lys74 were common among Type 1 and Type 2 DNV serotypes. Whereas in dengue type 4 and 4T, first interacting residue was Arg73 instead of Lys73. The presence of basic residue may be evolutionary insertion at position 73 of the allosteric sites of the NS3 proteases of all serotypes of Dengue for a proper interaction with binding molecule (Table 3). Hydrogen bonding interaction with amine functional group of the dabrafenib was also noticed with three proteases. This molecule shows pi stacking interactions with type 1 and 3 proteases.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

a. Graphical representation of detailed surface interaction of dabrafenib with the allosteric binding site residues of all five DENV proteases as obtained by molecular docking. b. 2D interaction diagram of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of all five DENV proteases as obtained by molecular docking. (A) Interaction of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of type 1 DENV protease (PDB: 3L6P). (B) Interaction of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of type 2 DENV protease (PDB: 4M9T). (C) Interaction of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of type 3 DENV protease (PDB: 3U1J). (D) Interaction of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of type 4 DENV protease (PDB: 2VBC). (E) Interaction of dabrafenib with the binding site residues of type 4T DENV protease (PDB: 2WHX).

Table 2. Interacting allosteric site residues of DNV type I with all three inhibitory molecules.

Sr. No Dabrafenib Idelalisib Nintedanib
1 Lys73 Val72 Lys73
2 Lys74 Lys73 Lys74
3 Ser88 Lys74 Ser88
4 Trp89 Asp75 Phe116
5 Thr118 Phn116 Thr118
6 Pro119 Thr118 Pro119
7 Glu120 Glu120 Glu120
8 Val123 Val123 Glu122
9 Gly124 Asn152 Val123
10 Val147 Gly153 Ala125
11 Asn152 Val154 Asn152
12 Ala164 Val162 Val154
13 Ile165 Ser163 Val162
14 Ala166 Ala164 Ser163
15 Gln167 Ala164
16 Ala168 Ile165
Gln167
Ala168
Lys169
Ala170

Note- Similar residues are indicated with same colour.

Table 3. Interaction of dabrafenib with all 5 DNV serotypes.

Sr. No DENV 1 DENV2 DENV3 DENV4 DENV4T
1 Lys73 Lys73 Lys74 Arg73 Arg73
2 Lys74 Lys 74 Gln88 Asn74 Asn74
3 Ser88 Leu85 Trp89 Asp75 76Met
4 Trp89 Glu86 Phe116 Met76 Lys88
5 Thr118 Gly87 Thr118 Phe116 Trp89
6 Pro119 Glu88 Glu122 Lys117 Lys 91
7 Glu120 Trp89 Ile123 Thr118 Leu115
8 Val123 Thr120 Gly124 Leu119 Glu122
9 Gly124 Ile123 Val147 Ile123 Ile123
10 Val147 Ala125 Asn152 Ala125 Gly124
11 Asn152 Val147 Ile165 Gly151 Ile145
12 Ala164 Asn152 Ala166 Asn152 Thr166
13 Ile165 Val162 Gln167 Gly153 Gln167
14 Ala166 ALa164 Thr168 Thr156 Ala168
15 Gln167 Ala166 Asn169 Val162 Glu169
16 Ala168 Asn167 Ala164
17 Thr168 Ile165
18 Glu169 Thr166
19 Gln167

Similar to dabrafenib, idelalisib which act as a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor, also showed good binding energies at allosteric sites (Table 1). Idelalisib is sold under the brand name Zydelig. It is a medication used to treat certain blood cancers. The binding of idelalisib was also dominated by hydrophobic interaction, however no hydrogen bonding interaction or pi stacking was noticed (S4 Fig). Two ionic interactions were noticed, one with type 3 and another with type 4T variant proteases. In DENV4T, the molecule was showing charged ionic interactions with residues Arg73 and Lys88 with aromatic moiety of the ligand molecule.

The other potential drug candidate, nintedanib, also favored the binding to the allosteric site of the proteases with good binding affinities against all the serotypes (Table 1). The medicine is sold under the brand names Ofev and Vargatef, and used for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Hydrogen bonding was not noticed in nintedanib binding with type 2 protease. Pi-pi interaction was present with DENV3 and DENV4 proteases. However, pi-cation interaction was seen in DENV3, DENV4, and DENV4T variants. The detailed interaction diagram of nintedanib is shown in S5 Fig.

In order to gain further insight into the mechanism of how ligand binding into the allosteric site of DENV protease impairs its function, MD simulations were performed on the three-ligand protease complexes (three ligand and DENV1 protease with PDB ID 3L6P). Dynamics of free protein was carried out as a control. Fig 5 shows the overall changes (standard deviations) in the protein (3L6P) structure upon binding to the molecules to the free protein over the course of simulation. It was observed that the protein was stable in a dynamic state and system was equilibrated and the deviations range fell below t3 Å, suggesting that large structural perturbation did not occur in free protein or after the allosteric ligand binding.

Fig 5. Overall structural changes in the type 1 dengue protease upon binding to the allosteric ligands.

Fig 5

Radius of gyration (Rg) is the distribution of atoms of protein around its center of mass. It is used to analyses the overall compactness of a macromolecule. Rg of DENV1 protease complexes were compared with that of the free protein and it is shown in S6 Fig. Rg values significantly decreased upon binding to dabrafenib. If a protein unfolds, the Rg of the protein increases. Decrease in Rg, in turn, indicated structural stability. However, it remained the same for nintedanib binding resonating the less effectiveness of nintedanib as an allosteric ligand; whereas dabrafenib appeared to be more effective in inducing structural changes in the target protease.

Local fluctuations in the protein are measured by root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) and they are useful for characterizing local changes along the protein chain [40]. RMSF of DENV1 protease upon binding to the three ligands was compared with that of the free protein in Fig 6. The peaks in the plot indicate amino acid residues of the protein that fluctuate the most during the MD simulation. Typically, the tails (N- and C-terminals) fluctuate more than any other part of the protein. Secondary structure elements like alpha helices and beta strands are usually more rigid than the unstructured part of the protein, and thus fluctuate less than the loop regions. The regions with Leu30, Glu61, Leu119, and Ser158 showed fluctuations below 3 Å range. These are present in the important loop regions of the protein. In protein-dabrafenib complex (Fig 6) the rate of fluctuations are higher at residue no 39 when compared to protein alone; whereas at no 50 residue the rate of fluctuations are higher in protein compared to that of the complex. In other residues, the fluctuations between protein and complex remained almost the same. In protein-idelalisib complex, the rates of fluctuations are higher at 55 residue than that of the protein. In all remaining residues the rate of fluctuations in complex were less compared to that of in the free protein. In protein-nintedanib complex, the rate of fluctuations was higher at no 41 residue than the free protein. In all remaining residues the rate of fluctuations in complex were less compared to the protein alone.

Fig 6. Residue-wise fluctuations in the type I dengue protease upon binding to the allosteric ligands.

Fig 6

Hydrogen bond interactions also play crucial role in biomolecular recognition [41]. Hydrogen bond profiles between the selected molecules and the target protein DENV1 (PDB: 3L6P) were calculated from the MD simulation trajectory. It was found that dabrafenib (Fig 7) did not form hydrogen bonds with the protein initially. However, after the molecular recognition occurred, it formed 3 hydrogen bonds indicating induced fit mode of binding. It is observed that idelalisib (Fig 7) can form one hydrogen bond by the end of simulation whereas 2 hydrogen bonds are formed in the early period of simulation. Nintedanib was found to form as many as 5 hydrogen bonds by the end of simulation whereas it showed only 1 hydrogen bond in the docked structure (S5 Fig).

Fig 7. Hydrogen bonding in the molecular recognition of the allosteric ligands with the allosteric binding pocket of the type 1 dengue protease.

Fig 7

Further, the effect of allosteric ligand binding on the secondary structure of DENV1 NS3 protease was analyzed using DSSP (Dictionary of Secondary Structure of Proteins) tools. It provides rough estimation of protein secondary structures along the time in MD simulations trajectory. Profile of secondary structure of protein and their complexes along the trajectory are shown in S7 and S8 Figs. In the dabrafenib-protein complex, there was an increase in bends from 20–30 residues region of the protein. An α -helix were found in the complex after 60 ns in between residues 55–65 whereas α-helix is seen in protein at 30ns at same residues. Bends in protein at residues 60–80 were replaced by coils in complex. The number of β-sheets increased in the complex between 160–180 residues after 70 ns of simulation. Fluctuations in bends and turns are more in the complex after 80 ns beyond 200th residues. Stable β-sheet was seen in the complex at around 200th residue whereas it is not observed in free protein. In protein-idelalisib complex, it was observed that α-helix is formed at 55–60 residues. Number of bends between 60–80 residues decreased in the complex. α-helix around residue 110, which was stable in protein got disrupted in the complex. The bends which were fluctuating in protein between 150–155 residues became stable in the complex. β-sheet region after residue 200 in complex was increased compared to the protein. An α-helix at 55–60 residues in protein was not seen in the protein-nintedanib complex. After 80th residue, turns and bends that were fluctuating got converted to bends in the complex.

Out of the three molecules, nintedanib exerted the least changes in RMSD, Rg and RMSF and the secondary structure compared to the free protein. Low RMSD value indicates that the structure of protein was least perturbed by ligand binding and the complex was very stable. Therefore, nintedanib provide good stability to the DENV1 NS3 protease. On the other hand, most structural perturbation in the protein was observed upon its binding to idelalisib, thus, indicating most potent effect idelalisib as an allosteric ligand. Dabrafenib also showed potent allosteric effect on the DENV1 NS3 protease in terms of structural perturbations.

NS3 protease is a trypsin-like serine protease, performs the post-translational proteolysis processing of the precursor protein. Therefore, several attempts have been made to find inhibitors against DENV by targeting the enzyme using both in in-silico and in vivo methods. The importance of proteins motion and fluctuation in the allosteric sites have significant impacts on the functional efficacy of proteases [23, 24]. Upon small-molecule binding to the allosteric sites, the protein undergoes a change in conformation or an alteration in the conformational equilibrium that affects the function of the enzyme. Mukhametova et al. have explored the allosteric binding site through large-scale virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations followed by calculations of binding free energy [39]. They have proposed two mechanisms for enzyme inhibition: firstly, ligand may either destabilize electronic density or create steric effects relating to the catalytic triad residues His51, Asp75, and Ser135; secondly, the ligand may disrupt the movement of the C-terminal of NS2B required for inter-conversion between the “open” and “closed” conformations of the enzyme.

We observed distinct conformational changes in the protein structure upon the ligand binding except for nintedanib. It indicated an induced fit mode of binding for dabrafenib and idelalisib, whereas the binding of nintedanib was mostly conformational selection. MD simulation, thus, indicated that nintedanib may not be effective modulator for the enzyme, as it cannot impart structural changes in the target protein. However, MD reaffirms the potential of the other two molecules to be allosteric modulators of DENV1 protease as they can impart significant structural changes upon binding to the target protein.

Conclusion and perspectives

Dengue virus is the cause of dengue fever and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). However, no specific antiviral treatment for the dengue infection is available so far. In recent years, a considerable research effort is being directed to discover therapies and drugs for the disease and several molecules are suggested to target the active site of NS3 protease. It is a key enzyme involves in viral replication and human infection. Therefore, the inhibition of this protease activity is an important route for preventing viral infection. In our current investigation, we could establish three known drug molecules, dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib could effectively bind to the allosteric site and affect the dynamics and conformation of the enzyme. This may cause modulaton of the functional activity. The potential allosteric site on NS3 protease was characterized and the active residues were identified.

The allosteric sites are evolutionarily less conserved and tend to vary in the different serotypes thus giving the opportunity to develop target specific drugs. Identification of the allosteric site also offers non-peptide based drug development opportunities for the protease, for which substrate analogue peptide based drugs are generally designed that can compete with the peptide substrate and strongly bind into the active site. However, peptide drugs are more susceptible to proteolytic digestion, thus, non-peptide based allosteric modulator provides and alternative strategy for the drug development for DENV proteases. Thus, the binding of the molecules could alternately terminate or decrease the performance of protease function. Experimental studies, however, may justify if the allosteric modulation favor/disfavor the activity of the proteases upon the binding of the molecules and whether it is to be considered as a drug candidate for dengue fever and related diseases.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Percentage identity matrix for the multiple sequence alignment of the proteases of five serotypes as generated by ClustalOmega.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Matrix plot showing the binding energies of the drug molecules against the five different serotypes as obtained as leads by virtual screening.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Ramachandran plots of selected proteases for docking and molecular dynamic analysis.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Detailed interaction diagram of idelalisib with the binding site residues of all five proteases as obtained by molecular docking.

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Detailed interaction diagram of nintedanib with the binding site residues of all five proteases as obtained by molecular docking.

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. Dynamic changes in the gyrating radius of the type 1 protease upon binding to the different synthetic allosteric ligands.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Secondary structure of free type 1 dengue protease over the course of MD simulation.

Color key: white, coil; red, beta-strand; black, beta-bridge; green, bend; yellow, turn; blue, alpha-helix; purple, pi-helix; gray, 3–10 helix.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Changes in the secondary structure of type 1 dengue protease upon binding to the allosteric ligands: Dabrafenib, idelalisib, nintedanib.

Color key: white, coil; red, beta-strand; black, beta-bridge; green, bend; yellow, turn; blue, alpha-helix; purple, pi-helix; gray, 3–10 helix.

(TIF)

S1 Table. List of the drug molecules along with their accession codes.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Available crystal structures of DENV NS3 protein.

PDB IDs marked with * are the 3D structures containing protease domain. Note:—1,2,3,4, refers to DENV types and 4T refers to DENV 4 Thailand variety.

(DOCX)

Abbreviations

D2R

Dopamine D2 receptor

DENV Type 1–4

Dengue (type1, type 2, type 3 and type 4)

DENV

Dengue virus

DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, DENV-4

four different serotypes of the dengue virus:, Serotype, a serotype refers to a group of viruses classified together based on their antigens or surface proteins on the surface of the virus

DENV4T

Dengue Thailand variant

DHF

Dengue hemorrhagic fever

Ds

double-stranded

DSS

Dengue shock syndrome

HCV

Hepatitis C virus

HIV

Human immunodeficiency virus

kb

kilo bases

kd

Equilibrium dissociation constant

MD

Molecular dynamics

NS

nonstructural

NS2B

Non-structural protein 2B

NS2B/NS3

Dengue NS2B protein linked with NS3 as co-factor

NS3

Non-structural protein 3

NS3pro

Dengue NS3 protease domain

NS4

Non-structural protein 4

NS5

Non-structural protein 5

NTPase

Nucleoside triphosphatase

PCZ

Prochlorperazine

PDB

Protein data bank

Rg

Radius of gyration

RMSD

Root mean square deviation

RMSF

Root mean square fluctuation

RTPase

RNA triphosphatase

VS

Virtual screening

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Rees CA, Hotez PJ, Monuteaux MC, Niescierenko M, Bourgeois FT. Neglected tropical diseases in children: An assessment of gaps in research prioritization. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raafat N, Blacksell SD, Maude RJ. A review of dengue diagnostics and implications for surveillance and control. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;113: 653–660. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trz068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodenhuis-Zybert IA, Wilschut J, Smit JM. Dengue virus life cycle: viral and host factors modulating infectivity. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2010;67: 2773–2786. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0357-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.N D. Tropical medicine. Surprising new dengue virus throws a spanner in disease control efforts. Science. 2013;342: 415–415. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6157.415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Katzelnick LC, Gresh L, Halloran ME, Mercado JC, Kuan G, Gordon A, et al. Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans. Science. 2017;358: 929–932. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496: 504–507. doi: 10.1038/nature12060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chambers TJ, Tsai TF, Pervikov Y, Monath TP. Vaccine development against dengue and Japanese encephalitis: report of a World Health Organization meeting. Vaccine. 1997;15: 1494–1502. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00195-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.In vitro processing of dengue virus type 2 nonstructural proteins NS2A, NS2B, and NS3. [cited 29 Oct 2020]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC247904/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Dighe SN, Ekwudu O, Dua K, Chellappan DK, Katavic PL, Collet TA. Recent update on anti-dengue drug discovery. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;176: 431–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rawlinson SM, Pryor MJ, Wright PJ, Jans DA. Dengue virus RNA polymerase NS5: a potential therapeutic target? Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7: 1623–1638. doi: 10.2174/138945006779025383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Luo D, Xu T, Hunke C, Grüber G, Vasudevan SG, Lescar J. Crystal Structure of the NS3 Protease-Helicase from Dengue Virus. J Virol. 2008;82: 173–183. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01788-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kharisma V, Muhammad A, Probojati R, Tamam M, Antonius Y. Revealing Potency of Bioactive Compounds as Inhibitor of Dengue Virus (DENV) NS2B/NS3 Protease from Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Leaves. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15: 1627. doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13644 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dwivedi VD, Bharadwaj S, Afroz S, Khan N, Ansari MA, Yadava U, et al. Anti-dengue infectivity evaluation of bioflavonoid from Azadirachta indica by dengue virus serine protease inhibition. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39: 1417–1430. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1734485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Panda K, Alagarasu K, Patil P, Agrawal M, More A, Kumar NV, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity of α-Mangostin against Dengue Virus Serotype-2 (DENV-2). Molecules. 2021;26: 3016. doi: 10.3390/molecules26103016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Millies B, von Hammerstein F, Gellert A, Hammerschmidt S, Barthels F, Göppel U, et al. Proline-Based Allosteric Inhibitors of Zika and Dengue Virus NS2B/NS3 Proteases. J Med Chem. 2019;62: 11359–11382. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lim L, Dang M, Roy A, Kang J, Song J. Curcumin Allosterically Inhibits the Dengue NS2B-NS3 Protease by Disrupting Its Active Conformation. ACS Omega. 2020;5: 25677–25686. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allosteric Inhibition of the NS2B-NS3 Protease from Dengue Virus | ACS Chemical Biology. [cited 29 Oct 2020]. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cb400612h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.A conformational switch high-throughput screening assay and allosteric inhibition of the flavivirus NS2B-NS3 protease. [cited 29 Oct 2020]. https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Wu H, Bock S, Snitko M, Berger T, Weidner T, Holloway S, et al. Novel Dengue Virus NS2B/NS3 Protease Inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 1100–1109. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03543-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Othman R, Kiat TS, Khalid N, Yusof R, Irene Newhouse E, Newhouse JS, et al. Docking of Noncompetitive Inhibitors into Dengue Virus Type 2 Protease: Understanding the Interactions with Allosteric Binding Sites. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48: 1582–1591. doi: 10.1021/ci700388k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teixeira RR, Pereira WL, da S Oliveira AFC, da Silva AM, de Oliveira AS, da Silva ML, et al. Natural products as source of potential dengue antivirals. Mol Basel Switz. 2014;19: 8151–8176. doi: 10.3390/molecules19068151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hassandarvish P, Rothan HA, Rezaei S, Yusof R, Abubakar S, Zandi K. In silico study on baicalein and baicalin as inhibitors of dengue virus replication. RSC Adv. 2016;6: 31235–31247. doi: 10.1039/C6RA00817H [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pal U, Maiti N. Pattern Based Detection of Potentially Druggable Binding Sites by Ligand Screening. J Proteins Proteomics. 2017;9: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gore S, Sanz García E, Hendrickx PMS, Gutmanas A, Westbrook JD, Yang H, et al. Validation of Structures in the Protein Data Bank. Struct England1993. 2017;25: 1916–1927. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Erbel P, Schiering N, D’Arcy A, Renatus M, Kroemer M, Lim SP, et al. Structural basis for the activation of flaviviral NS3 proteases from dengue and West Nile virus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13: 372–373. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simanjuntak Y, Liang J-J, Lee Y-L, Lin Y-L. Repurposing of prochlorperazine for use against dengue virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2015;211: 394–404. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Higgins DG, Sharp PM. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. 1988;73: 237–244. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90330-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lipman DJ, Altschul SF, Kececioglu JD. A tool for multiple sequence alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86: 4412–4415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31: 455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jacob RB, Andersen T, McDougal OM. Accessible high-throughput virtual screening molecular docking software for students and educators. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8: e1002499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pagadala NS, Syed K, Tuszynski J. Software for molecular docking: a review. Biophys Rev. 2017;9: 91–102. doi: 10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schneider G. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9: 273–276. doi: 10.1038/nrd3139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx. In: Hempel JE, Williams CH, Hong CC, editors. Chemical Biology: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer; 2015. pp. 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McInnes C. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007;11: 494–502. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rabelo VW-H, Viegas D de J, Tucci EMN, Romeiro NC, Abreu PA. Virtual screening and drug repositioning as strategies for the discovery of new antifungal inhibitors of oxidosqualene cyclase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;185: 189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shoichet BK. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature. 2004;432: 862–865. doi: 10.1038/nature03197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Protein-Ligand Complex. [cited 5 Aug 2021]. http://www.mdtutorials.com/gmx/complex/index.html
  • 38.Smart OS, Horský V, Gore S, Svobodová Vařeková R, Bendová V, Kleywegt GJ, et al. Worldwide Protein Data Bank validation information: usage and trends. Acta Crystallogr Sect Struct Biol. 2018;74: 237–244. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318003303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mukhametov A, Newhouse EI, Aziz NA, Saito JA, Alam M. Allosteric pocket of the dengue virus (serotype 2) NS2B/NS3 protease: In silico ligand screening and molecular dynamics studies of inhibition. J Mol Graph Model. 2014;52: 103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Biswas P, Adhikari A, Pal U, Singh P, Das M, Saha-Dasgupta T, et al. Flexibility modulates the catalytic activity of a thermostable enzyme: key information from optical spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. Soft Matter. 2020;16: 3050–3062. doi: 10.1039/c9sm02479d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pal U, Sen S, Maiti NC. Cα–H Carries Information of a Hydrogen Bond Involving the Geminal Hydroxyl Group: A Case Study with a Hydrogen-Bonded Complex of 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-propanol and Tertiary Amines. J Phys Chem A. 2014;118: 1024–1030. doi: 10.1021/jp411488a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Keivan Zandi

30 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-11598

Dabrafenib Acts as a Significant Allosteric Modulator for Dengue NS3 Protease

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Maiti,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 14 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Keivan Zandi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. We note that Figures 3, 4a and Scheme 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 3, 4a and Scheme 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. 

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

Additional Editor Comments:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors present a thorough in situ modeling approach to predict potential of small peptides to competitively bind to Dengue NS3 non-active site (allosterically) using routine molecular modeling tools. The authors identify 3 lead small molecules based upon their delta KCal/mol values of binding (< -9 kcal/mol): Dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib.

As there is no current approved therapy or antiviral (small molecule) for Dengue, a positive control was not available. However, authors referenced in conclusions previous studies with prochlorperazine (PCZ) which also had in vitro data supporting possible antiviral activity for Dengue (targeting NS3 protease). Why was PCZ not included in initial screening as control to validate modeling assays to others in the field? Notably, in Table 2, suggest include PCZ for comparison to 3 "hit" compounds.

Secondly, why do authors focus on Dabrafenib (title) when appears 3 hits were identified. Also, could be argued that based upon FIg 5, Idelalisib is predicted to have most impact on altering structure of NS3 protease (via allosteric binding). Caution that focus on Dabrafenib suggests conflict of interest or personal interests.

Third, suggest grammar/text be reviewed by expert editor as several spacing, capitalization, spacing and subscript use is inconsistent. Most notably, Fig 6 has mislabel of top figure (labeled twice as idelalisib, suggest it should be "dabrafenib".).

Lastly, as this is only predictive, clearly in vitro work is necessary follow up and more relevant going forward to confirm antiviral potential and more importantly to determine potential toxicity. As these are anticancer drugs, toxicity is often associated. targeting protease is likely to have non-specific interaction with host proteases as well. Must test for potential tox.

Reviewer #2: the authors try to established three drug molecules (dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib)against all the dengue serotypes (dengue1, dengue 2, dengue 3, dengue 4 & dengue 4T) protease. All the three drugs candidates show stable and strong binding with dengue NS3 based on the authors analysis. The author has done sufficient in silico study to investigate potentially of three drugs inhibiting dengue virus through dengue protease (NS3/NS2B). I have no objection to proceed this manuscript for publishing.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Pouya Hassandarvish

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257206.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Aug 2021

Response to the questions and queries raised by PLOS ONE editor and reviewers:

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Author response: All relevant data are given within the manuscript and the supporting documents. We don’t have any other data to provide as repository information.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Author response: We have added the ORCID iD of corresponding author.

4. We note that Figures 3, 4a and Scheme 1 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

Author response: We have regenerated Figures 3, 4a and Scheme 1 and replaced them accordingly. We have also modified Figures 1, 2, 4b and scheme 2 with better graphics.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Author response: Captions for Supporting Informations have been added accordingly.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice

Author response: Reference list has been reviewed thoroughly. We have modified the list and cited some additional research articles for better understanding.

The following references have been added:

1. Kharisma V, Muhammad A, Probojati R, Tamam M, Antonius Y. Revealing Potency of Bioactive Compounds as Inhibitor of Dengue Virus (DENV) NS2B/NS3 Protease from Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Leaves. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15: 1627. doi:10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13644

2. Dwivedi VD, Bharadwaj S, Afroz S, Khan N, Ansari MA, Yadava U, et al. Anti-dengue infectivity evaluation of bioflavonoid from Azadirachta indica by dengue virus serine protease inhibition. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39: 1417–1430. doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1734485

3. Panda K, Alagarasu K, Patil P, Agrawal M, More A, Kumar NV, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity of α-Mangostin against Dengue Virus Serotype-2 (DENV-2). Molecules. 2021;26: 3016. doi:10.3390/molecules26103016

4. Millies B, von Hammerstein F, Gellert A, Hammerschmidt S, Barthels F, Göppel U, et al. Proline-Based Allosteric Inhibitors of Zika and Dengue Virus NS2B/NS3 Proteases. J Med Chem. 2019;62: 11359–11382. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01697

5. Hassandarvish P, Rothan HA, Rezaei S, Yusof R, Abubakar S, Zandi K. In silico study on baicalein and baicalin as inhibitors of dengue virus replication. RSC Adv. 2016;6: 31235–31247. doi:10.1039/C6RA00817H

6. Protein-Ligand Complex. [cited 5 Aug 2021]. Available: http://www.mdtutorials.com/gmx/complex/index.html

5. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: The authors present a thorough in situ modeling approach to predict potential of small peptides to competitively bind to Dengue NS3 non-active site (allosterically) using routine molecular modeling tools. The authors identify 3 lead small molecules based upon their delta KCal/mol values of binding (<-9 kcal/mol): Dabrafenib, idelalisib and nintedanib.

Comment: As there is no current approved therapy or antiviral (small molecule) for Dengue, a positive control was not available. However, authors referenced in conclusions previous studies with prochlorperazine (PCZ) which also had in vitro data supporting possible antiviral activity for Dengue (targeting NS3 protease). Why was PCZ not included in initial screening as control to validate modeling assays to others in the field? Notably, in Table 2, suggest include PCZ for comparison to 3 "hit" compounds.

Author response: We thank the reviewer for raising this issue. Prochlorperazine (PCZ) has been reported as an entry blocker/ inhibitor and not a NS3 protease inhibitor of DENV. As the proposed mechanism of action and the target protein of PCZ is completely different, we did not include PCZ as control. We have clarified this issue in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Secondly, why do authors focus on Dabrafenib (title) when appears 3 hits were identified. Also, could be argued that based upon FIg 5, Idelalisib is predicted to have most impact on altering structure of NS3 protease (via allosteric binding). Caution that focus on Dabrafenib suggests conflict of interest or personal interests.

Author response: It is true that according to Fig 5. Idelalisib seems to be more impactful on alteration of DENV NS3 protein structure. On contrary, dabrafenib showed better (lowest) binding energies (kcal/mol) against all of the dengue serotypes. From S6 Fig, it can also be seen that upon binding to dabrafenib, radius of gyration value (Rg) significantly decreased. However we want to declare that there is no conflict of interest or personal interest from our end. We have changed the title of the revised manuscript to accommodate the three identified hits.

Comment: Third, suggest grammar/text be reviewed by expert editor as several spacing, capitalization, spacing and subscript use is inconsistent. Most notably, Fig 6 has mislabel of top figure (labeled twice as idelalisib, suggest it should be "dabrafenib".).

Author response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the mistake. We have corrected the labels of Fig 6 in the revised manuscript. We have also thoroughly revised the text to rectify any typos, inconsistent formats and grammatical mistakes.

Comment: Lastly, as this is only predictive, clearly in vitro work is necessary follow up and more relevant going forward to confirm antiviral potential and more importantly to determine potential toxicity. As these are anticancer drugs, toxicity is often associated. targeting protease is likely to have non-specific interaction with host proteases as well. Must test for potential tox.

Author response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. In future we plan perform in-vitro assays and cytotoxicity tests against all three potential drug candidate in collaboration with experimental research groups.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Keivan Zandi

26 Aug 2021

Dabrafenib, Idelalisib and Nintedanib Act as Significant Allosteric Modulator for Dengue NS3 Protease

PONE-D-21-11598R1

Dear Dr. Maiti,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Keivan Zandi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Keivan Zandi

31 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-11598R1

Dabrafenib, Idelalisib and Nintedanib Act as Significant Allosteric Modulator for Dengue NS3 Protease

Dear Dr. Maiti:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Keivan Zandi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Percentage identity matrix for the multiple sequence alignment of the proteases of five serotypes as generated by ClustalOmega.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Matrix plot showing the binding energies of the drug molecules against the five different serotypes as obtained as leads by virtual screening.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Ramachandran plots of selected proteases for docking and molecular dynamic analysis.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Detailed interaction diagram of idelalisib with the binding site residues of all five proteases as obtained by molecular docking.

    (TIFF)

    S5 Fig. Detailed interaction diagram of nintedanib with the binding site residues of all five proteases as obtained by molecular docking.

    (TIFF)

    S6 Fig. Dynamic changes in the gyrating radius of the type 1 protease upon binding to the different synthetic allosteric ligands.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Secondary structure of free type 1 dengue protease over the course of MD simulation.

    Color key: white, coil; red, beta-strand; black, beta-bridge; green, bend; yellow, turn; blue, alpha-helix; purple, pi-helix; gray, 3–10 helix.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Changes in the secondary structure of type 1 dengue protease upon binding to the allosteric ligands: Dabrafenib, idelalisib, nintedanib.

    Color key: white, coil; red, beta-strand; black, beta-bridge; green, bend; yellow, turn; blue, alpha-helix; purple, pi-helix; gray, 3–10 helix.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. List of the drug molecules along with their accession codes.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Available crystal structures of DENV NS3 protein.

    PDB IDs marked with * are the 3D structures containing protease domain. Note:—1,2,3,4, refers to DENV types and 4T refers to DENV 4 Thailand variety.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES