Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257071

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus niger

Ghada Mahmoud Abdelwahab 1,2,*, Amira Mira 1, Yuan-Bin Cheng 3, Tarek A Abdelaziz 4, Mohamed Farid I Lahloub 1, Ashraf Taha Khalil 1
Editor: Mohammad Shahid5
PMCID: PMC8432876  PMID: 34506550

Abstract

Aspergillus niger metabolites exhibited a wide range of biological properties including antioxidant and neuro-protective effects and some physical properties as green synthesis of silver nanoparticles AgNP. The present study presents a novel evidence for the various biological activities of green synthesized AgNPs. For the first time, some isolated naphtho-γ-pyrones from marine-derived Aspergillus niger, flavasperone (1), rubrofusarin B (2), aurasperone A (3), fonsecinone A (4) in addition to one alkaloid aspernigrin A (7) were invistigated for their inhibitory activity of acetylcholine esterase AChE, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The ability to synthesize AgNPs by compounds 3, 4 and 7 has been also tested for the first time. Green synthesized AgNPs were well-dispersed, and their size was ranging from 8–30 nm in diameter, their morphology was obviously spherical capped with the organic compounds. Further biological evaluation of their AChE inhibitory activity was compared to the parent compounds. AgNps dramatically increased the inhibitory activity of Compounds 4, 3 and 7 by 84, 16 and 13 fold, respectively to be more potent than galanthamine as a positive control with IC50 value of 1.43 compared to 0.089, 0.311 and 1.53 of AgNPs of Compounds 4, 3 and 7, respectively. Also compound 2 showed moderate inhibitory activity. This is could be probably explained by closer fitting to the active sites or the synergistic effect of the stabilized AgNPs by the organic compouds. These results, in addition to other intrinsic chemical and biological properties of naphtho-γ-pyrones, suggest that the latter could be further explored with a view towards other neuroprotective studies for alleviating AD.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer (AD) is a progressive multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder affecting millions of elders all over the world leading to increased burden on family members and medical care system. AD accounts for 80% of cases of dementia and is manifested by memory loss and cognitive impairment enough to interfere with daily life in addition to behavioral change [1]. Current treatment mitigates the symptoms rather than alter the course of disease [2, 3]. The disease has two hallmarks, first the deposition of β-amyloid peptide that clump into plaques that contribute The disease has two hallmarks, first the deposition of β-amyloid peptide that clump into plaques that contribute to aggregation of abnormal tau peptides forming tangles leading to disruption of transport system and damage of the neurons [4, 5], the insufficiency of acetylcholine neurotransmitter in some synapses of the brain cells leading to their degeneration [6, 7]. Consequently, the leading prescribed drugs are acetylcholine esterase (AChE) inhibitors as rivastigmine and donepezil may improve the symptoms. Recent research is ongoing (though with little success) on β-secretase inhibitors and vaccine that stimulate body’s immune system to attack abnormal form of tau protein are still under investigation [2, 8, 9]. Reduction of oxidative stress and neuro-protection is another appealing target of therapy [1012]. Besides its recent applications in industry [13], detection and diagnosis of some diseases [14], nanotechnology has a valuable role in drug delivery and monitoring [15, 16]. Multifunctional nanoparticles may help in early molecular diagnosis of AD through signal transduction approach by utilizing their special physical (optical, electric and magnetic), chemical and biological characteristics to transform a biological signal (a biomarker) to a recordable one [14], For delivery of drugs acting on central nervous system, various nanocarriers such as dendrimers, nano gels, liposomes, nano-emulsions, polymeric nano-particles and nano suspensions have been studied. The nanotreatment methods for AD include neuroprotection against toxicity of the oxidative stress of free radicals and amyloid-β-peptide (Aβ) oligomers as well as nanocarriers (particle size 1–100) for targeted drug delivery that can cross blood/brain barrier efficiently [17], The important agents for neuroprotection include nanogels, nano-cerium, nano-silver, dendrimers and gold nanoparticles [18]. The major nanocarriers include metal chelator nanocarriers (iron and copper chelators), cholinesterase inhibitors nanocarriers, acetylcholine nanocarrier, anti-oxidant nanocarriers, and gene nanocarriers [19, 20].

Among different nanometals, Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) has acquired unlimited interest owing to their exceptional chemical stability, non-allergic properties, besides their significant antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective activities [21, 22]. Silver nanoparticles are used in wound dressings, disinfectant formulas, skin creams, contraceptive devices, surgical instruments and bone prostheses [23, 24]. Synthesis of nanoparticles frequently requires high temperature, pressure; utilizes toxic chemicals and is not cost-effective. The green method that uses micro-organisms or plants (or their secondary metabolites) is simple, quick, low-cost, ecofriendly and produce biocompatible, stable nano-particles [25]. Several plant extracts [22, 26], bacteria [27], cyanobacteria [28] and fungi [29, 30], notably Aspergillus niger produced AgNPs with size range down to 7.7 nanometersuggesting [31, 32]. Shape and size of nanoparticles may be adapted in order to deliver effective anti-AD drugs with reduced neurotoxicity [3335].

The significant ability of Aspergillus niger to synthesize AgNPs may be due to its abundant bioactive reducing metabolites [36, 37]; some with neuroprotective activity [38]. Aspergillus sp. is generous producer of naphthopyrone phenolic compounds under certain stress conditions [39]. These compounds exhibited diverse biological properties as anti-bacterial [40, 41], hepatoprotective [42], Acyl CoA inhibitor [43], cytotoxic [44], anti-mutagenic [45], antiallergic [46], antiviral [47], non-toxic antioxidant [48], anti-xanthine oxidase [49], anti-tyrosinase [47], anti-HIV-1 integrase [47], anti-COX-2 [50] and anti-AChE/anti-β-secretase [51] activities. Considering AD as a multifactorial disease, the inhibition of the latter enzyme may be potentiated by reducing oxidative stress secured by the inherent potent antioxidant activity, thus rendering naphtha-γ-pyrones worthy candidates for alleviating AD symptoms.

The current study describes green synthesis of AgNPs by pure isolated metabolites which resulted in synergy of its activity against AChE enzyme and may lead to possible decrease of the dose required to exert their action with lower side effects. This was done by using marine-derived Aspergillus niger solid fermentation culture extract to isolate and identify (by spectroscopic analysis) six naphthopyrones derivatives viz. flavasperone(1), rubrofusarin B (2), aurasperone A (3), fonsecinone A (4), asperpyrone B (5), asperpyrone C (6) in addition to one alkaloid aspernigrin A (7). To estimate the AChEI of the isolated compounds, Ellman’s method was adopted [52]. The ability to green synthesize silver nanoparticles from aqueous solution of AgNO3 was also investigated [53]. The produced capped silver nanoparticles were characterized using UV-Vis spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Their AChEI activity was compared to their parent compounds using galanthamine as positive control.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. General experimental procedures

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3, CDOD3 and DMSO-d6 solutions with TMS as internal standard at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR on BRUKER Avance III spectrometer. Mass experiments were conducted with LC/MS system (Advion compact mass spectrometer (CMS) NY,USA) by using Analyst version 1.4.1 software (MDS Sciex) where analytes were ionized in the negative and positive mode using electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. Final compounds purity was monitored by using pre-coated silica gel 60 GF254 (20 x 20 cm, 0.2 mm thick) on aluminum sheets (Merck, Germany), and pre-coated reversed phase RP18F254S (20 X 20 cm) plates, (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), where as UV and vanillin/sulfuric acid spray reagent were used as revealing agents. Silica gel G 60–230 mesh (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) were used for column chromatography. RP HPLC using Cosmosil AR-II, 250 x 10 mm i.d and 250x 4.6 mm i.d using a Jasco PU2089 gradient pump and PU2075 UV/VIS detector. Reading absorbance was done by BioTek Microplate reader. HRTEM (JEM-2100) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a CCD camera at an accelerating voltage 200 kV was used for silver nanoparticles imaging and analytical characterization to assess their size, shape, and morphology.

2.2. Chemicals and reagents

Organic solvents were distilled before use and spectral grade solvents were used for spectroscopic measurements. All chemicals used were reagent grade and purchased from commercial suppliers. Reagents for biological assays were used as previously prescribed [54].

2.3. Fungal material, isolation and culture conditions

Aspergillus niger was isolated from the Red Sea tunicate Phallusia nigra collected by SCUBA diving at 5 m in depth (located at 27°17’04.8”N, 33°46’30.3”E) from a coral reef area in the Red Sea, Hurghada, Egypt in June 2017. The sample was collected and identified by researchers at the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Hurghada, Egypt, that are allowed to carry out their scientific research, including collecting samples from the field study area with no official permit (Act 4, 1994). Furthermore, this organism was recently listed among the invasive species of the Mediterranean Sea [55]. Two organisms only were collected and their fresh weight was less than 100 gm. After rinsing the specimen with sterile sea water, it was transferred directly to the laboratory in a cooler bag filled with sterile sea water to be processed immediately.

The tunicate was rinsed three times with sterile seawater and superficially disinfected with 70% ethyl alcohol for 2 minutes then, cut aseptically into small pieces (2 x 2 cm) using a sterile dissection razor and cultivated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, Hants, UK) plates in 50% aged sea water supplemented with 250 mg/L Amoxycillin to avoid any bacterial growth. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 1–2 weeks until adequate growth of the fungus. Pure strains of Aspergillus niger were isolated by repeated re-inoculation on saline PDA plates. Pure cultures were streaked on PDA slants for further study [56].

2.4. Identification of the endophytic isolate

The fungus was identified as Aspergillus niger by PCR using the universal fungal primers Internal Transcript Spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS4) (GenBank accession No.LC582533). A voucher strain of the fungus is deposited at the biological lab of the Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt.

2.5. Cultivation

The fresh mycelia in each of thirty PDA petri dish were inoculated into an pre-autoclaved Erlynmeyer 1L conical flask containing 80 g wheat in 110 ml 50% aged sea water (30 flasks). The cotton-plugged fermentation flasks were incubated for three weeks at room temperature away from light.

2.6. Extraction and isolation of metabolites

Secondary metabolites of the fungus were extracted with EtOAc (3 x 1L) by sonication at 50°C for 15 minutes. The combined EtOAc extract was filtered and concentrated to dryness using rotary vacuum evaporator at 50°C followed by defatting by n-hexane in a separating funnel. The dried extract (6 g) was fractionated over CC (SiO2, CH2Cl2/EtOAc 100: 0 to 0: 100, then EtOAc/MeOH 100: 0 to 0:100) to afford 15 fractions. Fr. 1–1 (46 mg) was eluted by methylene chloride (100%) to afford a mixture of compounds 1 and 2 that was rechromatographed over CC (SiO2, petroleum ether/CH2Cl2, 20:80) to yield compound 1 (12 mg) and compound 2 (5 mg). Fr. 1–3 (26 mg) was eluted by CH2Cl2/EtOAc (90: 10) then, it was subjected to CC (SiO2, CH2Cl2/EtOAc75: 25, isocratic) to afford compound 3 (17 mg) and compound 4 (7 mg), then each of compound 3, 4 were finally purified over Sephadex LH-20 using CH2Cl2/MeOH (85:15) as eluting solvent. Fr. 1–2 (128 mg) also containing compound 3 and 4 at nearly about 25% of their total weight by TLC visualization and still under investigation but, choosing fr. 1–3 was based on the purity of the fraction. Fr. 1–4 was eluted by CH2Cl2/EtOAc (85: 15) then, it was subjected to NP-HPLC Silica column, isocratic Hexane/EtOAc (1:2), 290 nm, flow 2.0 mL/min to afford three sub-fractions. Sub-fr. 1-4-1(23.8 mg) was further purified using RP-HPLC, CN-column using isocratic 60% MeOH, flow rate 2.0 mL/min, and detection at 210 nm, to yield two sub-fractions. Sub fraction 1-4-1-1 yielded compound 3 (14.8 mg) and Sub-fr.1-4-1-2 (3 mg) was finally purified over RP-HPLC, biphenyl column using isocratic 75% Acetonitile, flow rate 1.5 mL/min at 210 nm to afford compound 5 (0.5 mg). Sub-fr. 1-4-2 gave compound 4 (82.3 mg). Sub-fr. 1-4-3 yielded compound 6 (2.3 mg). Fr. 15 eluted by EtOAc 100% was purified by recrystalization to afford compound 7 (7.5 mg).

2.7. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)

The isolated and identified compounds were screened for their ability towards green synthesis of AgNPs from silver nitrate solution. Therefore, five mM of each compound 3, 4 and 7 were dissolved in 1 ml ethanol by heating and stirring. Six serial dilutions of each compound were prepared. Serial dilutions were used in order to detect the minimum concentration as well as the optimum concentration necessary for the synthesis of AgNPs. Two hundreds μl of each dilution were added to two adjacent wells in a 12-well plates (1st well for AgNPs and the 2nd well for blank), for each corresponding well 1 ml of AgNO3 (2 mM) solution was added dropwise to the test wells, while 1ml of distilled water was added to the blank wells. Then, the microwell plates were heated to 50°C in a water bath for 1 hour and the color changes were observed after cooling gradually from yellow to brown. The brown color indicates the formation of AgNPs by reducing Ag+ to Ag°. The biosynthesized AgNPs were centrifuged, lyophilized and stored for further studies.

2.8. UV-visible spectroscopy

Reduction of silver ions in solution was monitored using the UV-Vis absorption as a method of choice. So herein Elisa plate reader was used as a high throughput screening method alongside with monitoring the color change. Absorption was read at 450 nm for each experiment after 60 min and after 48 h.

2.9. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Size, shape, and morphology of the biosynthesized AgNPs were measured using a transmission electron microscope HRTEM (JEM-2100) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV. TEM grids were prepared by placing few drops of the AgNPs suspensions on carbon-coated copper grids and allowed to be slowly evaporated prior to recording the TEM images.

2.10. Molecular docking study

With the aim to investigate the different theoretical bindings of the protein-ligand geometrics at molecular level, molecular docking experiments were performed using molecular operating environment (MOE) program version 2014 (0901). The aged phosphorylated AChE crystal structure was retrieved from RCSB-Protein Data Bank (PDB, code 1CFJ) with resolution 2.60 Å and imported into workspace of MOE. Protein energy was set up and hydrogens were added. The 3D structures of the ligands were drawn using Chem3D 15.0 software (Cambridge soft corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA) and saved as mol2 format. The ligands were docked at the largest cavity (size 174 A°) detected by the program.

2.11. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory assay

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of isolated compounds and their synthesized silver nanoparticles were assessed using Ellman’s method as previously prescribed [54].

3. Results

All the compounds (Fig 1) were identified by spectroscopic methods (1H, 13C NMR), mass spectral data and by matching with the previously published data [5760].

Fig 1. Structures of compounds isolated from Aspergillus niger.

Fig 1

Flavasperone(1): Yellow needles; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 2.41 (3H, s), 3.84 (3H, s), 3.88 (3H, s), 6.19 (1H, s), 6.31 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.49 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.77 (1H,s), 12.74 (1H,s). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 182.8 (C-4), 166.6 (C-2), 161.4 (C-8), 159.0 (C-10), 156.6 (C-5), 155.8 (C-11), 141.2 (C-13), 110.2 (C-3), 108.8 (C-14), 105.7 (C-6), 104.8 (C-12), 97.9(C-7), 96.9 (C-9), 55.8 (10-OCH3), 55.4 (8-OCH3), 20.5 (C-15). ESI-MS (negative-ion mode) m/z 285.0 [M—H]-; (calcd for C16H14O5 286.0841).

Rubrofusarin B(2): Yellow needles; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 2.3 (3H, s), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.93 (3H, s), 5.93 (1H, s), 6.33 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.52 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.9 (1H, s), 14.91 (1H, s). ESI-MS (negative-ion mode) m/z 285.0 [M—H]-; (calcd for C16H14O5 286.0841).

Aurasperone A(3): Yellow powder;1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 2.05 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s), 3.39 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, s), 3.72 (3H, s), 3.96 (3H, s), 5.92 (1H, s), 5.99 (1H, s), 6.14 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.35 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.97 (1H, s), 7.09 (1H, s), 14.77 (1H, s), 15.19 (1H, s).13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 184.6 (C-4′), 184.5 (C-4), 167.7 (C-2), 167.6 (C-2′), 162.7 (5’-OH), 162.0 (5-OH), 161.4 (C-8′), 161.0 (C-6′), 160.2 (C-8), 158.5 (C-6), 153.4 (C-10a), 150.8 (C-10′a), 140.7 (C-9a), 140.6 (C-9′a), 117.6 (C-7), 111.4 (C-5a), 108.6 (C-5′a), 107.5 (C-3), 107.3 (C-3′), 105.2 (C-10′), 104.7 (C-4a), 104.3 (C-4′a), 101.4 (C-9), 101.2 (C-10), 96.9 (C-7’), 96.5 (C-9’), 62.1 (6-OCH3), 56.2 (6’-OCH3), 56.0 (8-OCH3), 55.2 (8’-OCH3), 20.8 (2-CH3), 20.6 (2′-CH3). ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z 571.16 [M + H] +; (calcd for C32H26O10, 570. 1560).

Fonsecinone A(4): Yellow powder; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 2.06 (3H, s), 2.42 (3H, s), 3.36 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, s), 3.72 (3H, s), 3.97 (3H, s), 5.94 (1H, s), 6.12 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.27 (1H, s), 6.36 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.90 (1H, s), 6.99 (1H, s), 12.78 (1H, s), 15.20 (1H, s).13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 184.6 (C-4’), 182.9 (C-4), 167.5 (C-2), 166.9 (C-2’), 162.8 (C-5’), 161.6 (C-6’), 161.1 (C-6’), 160 (C-8), 156.9 (C-10), 156.7 (C-5), 155.1 (C-10b), 150.8 (C-10’a), 140.8 (C-6a), 140.6 (C-9’a), 117.1(C-9), 110.7 (C-3), 109.4 (C-4a), 108.6 (C-5’a), 108.0 (C-10a), 107.4 (C-3’), 106.0 (C-6), 105.1 (C-10’), 104.2 (C-4’a), 101.6 (C-7), 97.0 (C-7’), 96.3 (C-9’), 61.2 (C-10-OCH3), 56.2 (C-6’-OCH3), 56,0 (C-8-OCH3), 55.2 (C-8’-OCH3), 20.7 (2′-CH3), 20.6 (2-CH3). ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z 571.16 [M + H]+; (calcd for C31H26O10, 570.1560).

Asperpyrone B(5): Yellow powder; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):6.29 (1H, s), 7.02 (1H, s), 6.96 (1H, s), 2.46 (3H, s), 12.79 (1H, s), 3.78 (3H, s), 3.59 (3H, s), 6.31 (1H, s), 6.18 (1H, d, J = 2.1), 6.42 (1H, d, J = 2.1), 2.53 (3H, s), 13.18 (1H, s), 3.59 (3H, s), 3.99 (3H, s).13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):183.0 (C-4’), 182.9 (C-4), 166.8 (C-2), 166.5 (C-2’), 161.6 (C-8’), 160.0 (C-8), 159.5 (C-10’), 156.6 (C-10), 156.5 (C-5), 155.8 (C-10’b), 155.0 (C-10b), 154.3 (C-5’), 140.9 (C-6a’), 140.7 (C-6a), 117.9 (C-9), 110.6 (C-3), 110.3 (C-3’), 109.7 (C-6’), 109.3 (C-4a), 108.5 (C-4’a), 108.1 (C-10a), 106.2 (C-6), 105.1 (10’a), 101.9 (C-7), 96.8 (C-9’), 96.4 (C-7’), 61.5 (C-8’-OCH3), 56.1 (C-8-OCH3), 56.0 (C-10’-OCH3), 55.2 (C-10-OCH3), 20.6 (2′-CH3), 20.5 (2-CH3). ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z571.08 [M + H] +; (calcd for C31H26O10, 570. 1560).

Asperpyrone C (6): Yellow powder; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 2.12 (3H, s), 2.42 (3H, s), 3.46 (3H, s), 3.62 (3H, s), 3.79 (3H, s), 4.03 (3H, s), 5.98 (1H, s), 6.06 (1 H, d, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.21 (1H, s), 6.41 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.97 (1H, s), 7.15 (1H, s). ESI-MS (positive-ion mode) m/z571.15 [M + H]+; (calcd for C32H26O10, 570.1560).

Aspernigrin A (7):Colorless needles; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 3.9 (2H, s), 6.23 (1H, s), 7.27 (1H, m), 7.28 (2H, m), 7.34 (2H, m), 8.33 (1H, s), 14-NH2 9.52 (br s), 7.41(br s). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 187.1 (C-4), 166 (14-NH2), 151.3 (C-6), 142.2 (C-1), 137.4 (C-8), 129.5 (C-10), 129.3 (C-12), 129.2 (C-9), 129 (C-13), 127.4 (C-11), 118.8 (C-5), 117.9 (C-3), 38.2 (C-7). ESI-MS (negative-ion mode) m/z 227 [M—H]-; (calcd for C13H12N2O2Na 251.0796).

3.1. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and characterization by UV-vis spectroscopy

Aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin A were screened as reported by Chauhan, 2012 [53] with some modifications to get a rapid tool for screening many concentrations of different compounds for their ability to green synthesize AgNPs. Reading absorbance spectrophotometrically using 12-microwell plates at 450 nm is an easy method as, transparency of the microwell plate facilitate the color monitoring. Asperpyrone B and asperpyrone C have small amounts that were enough only for spectroscopic identification while flavasperoneand rubrofusarin B have a low polarity hence, these compounds could not be tested. (Fig 2) showed the absorption peak of the AgNPs synthesized by the three organic compounds obsedved between 441 and 463 nm as a result of their Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Five mM of each tested compound was dissolved in 1 ml EtOH by heating and stirring. Six serial dilutions of each compound were prepared then 1 ml of 2 mM (AgNO3) solution was added dropwise. Microwell plates were heated to 50°C in a water bath for 1 hour until color change to dark yellow. Figs 3 and 4 show the color change of the reaction solution from colorless (aspernigrin A) and pale yellow (aurasperone A, fonsecinone A) to faint brown after 1 h when compared with blank for each corresponding compound. The color was changed to dark brown when full reduction of silver ions was completed after 48 h at 25°C. It was noted that even very small concentrations could synthesize AgNPs. The biosynthesized AgNPs were centrifuged lyophilized and tested for AChEI activity.

Fig 2. UV–Vis spectrum of AgNPs synthesized using aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin A.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Schematic representation of green synthesis of AgNPs by pure isolated compounds.

Fig 3

Fig 4. UV absorbance of compounds aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin A upon addition of AgNO3 solution after 1 h. and after 48 h.

Fig 4

3.2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging

Transmission Electron Microscopy images of the biosynthesized AgNPs by aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin Awith optimum concentration in different magnifications are shown in (Fig 5). The AgNPs were well-dispersed, and their size was ranging from 8–30 nm in diameter. In addition, the morphology of the synthesized AgNPs was obviously spherical capped with the organic compounds which indicates a good stabilization effect of the investigated compounds [61].

Fig 5. Transmission electron microscopy images of biosynthesized AgNPs at different magnifications of (1) Aurasperone A; (2) Fonsecinone A; (3) Aspernigrin A.

Fig 5

3.3. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory assay

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory (AChEI) activity was assessed by using Ellman’s method [52, 62, 63]. The results are shown in Table 1. Asperpyrone-type bis-naphtho-γ-pyrones showed remarkable AChE inhibition particularly with their green synthesized AgNPs. The AgNPs showed AChE inhibitory activity with IC50 value of 2.29 μM and has increased the AChE inhibitory activity of fonsecinone A by 84 fold (IC50 value decreased from 7.52 to 0.089μM) followed by aurasperone A AgNPs which its inhibitory activity has been increased by 16 fold (IC50 value decreased from 4.9 to 0.311 μM) compared to galanthamine as a positive control (IC50 values of 1.43). The activity of the alkaloid aspernigrin A also increased by 13 fold after AgNPs synthesis (IC50 value decreased from 20.17 to 1.53 μM). This remarkable decrease in the IC50 value could be ascribed to the synergistic effect of AgNPs when capped with the tested compounds. The linear naphtho-γ-pyronerubrofusarin B showed moderate inhibitory activity with IC50 value of 13.87 μM, while compound flavasperone didn’t show any inhibitory activity.

Table 1. AChEI activity of the isolated compounds and their synthesized AgNPs1.

Compound IC50(μM) Binding energy (Kcal/mol) H-Bonding Arene-H Bonding
AgNPs 2.29 ± 0.013 ------- ------- -------
Flavasperone (1) > 25 inactive -6.02967262 Tyr-130,Trp -84 --------
Rubrofusarin B (2) 13.87 ± 2.16 -11.7267284 Glu-199, Ser-122 --------
Aurasperone A (3) 4.90 ± 2.16 -14.2922001 Asn-85,Asp-72,Phe-331 Phe-331
Aurasperone A AgNPs 0.311 ± 0.018 ------- ------- -------
Fonsecinone A (4) 7.52 ± 2.16 -11.1807451 Tyr-70,Phe-288, Lie-287 Tyr-334
Fonsecinone A AgNPs 0.089 ± 0.005 ------- ------- -------
Asperginin A (7) 20.17 ± 3.03 -10.181241 Phe-288, Phe-330 Phe-330
Asperginin A AgNPs 1.53 ± 0.076 ------- ------- -------

1 Galanthamine (positive control) IC50 = 1.43 ± 0.36 μM, Binding score -11.8111763, H-Bonding (Gly-118, Gly-119, His-440) and Hydrophobic H-Bonding (Phe-330).

4. Discussion

4.1. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)

AgNPs are known to exhibit a UV–Visible absorption maxima in the range of 400–500 nm due to their Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) [64, 65]. SPR is the collective oscillation of conduction band electrons which are in resonance with the oscillating electric field of incident light, that produce energetic plasmonic electrons through non-radiative excitation [66]. It is the basis of many standard tools for measuring adsorption of material onto planar metal or metal nanoparticle surfaces. Aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin A showed absorption peaksappearing between 441 and 463 nm because of their SPR may differ due to variation in the size and shape of the synthesized AgNPs. The synthesis of AgNPs was detected by the color change to dark yellow or brown color, which is a typical color of AgNPs in solution [53].

4.2. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory assay

To gain insights about the theoretical binding modes of the active compound with the binding residues of the active sites of AChE, molecular docking simulation experiments were done and the results were compatible with AChE inhibitory assay results (binding energy is shown in Table 1). Kinetic studies, torpedo and mammal x-ray crystallography of AChE were showed that the active sites consist of the esteratic site, the active narrow gorge, the peripheral anionic site (PAS), the oxyanionic hole and the catalytic anionic site. The esteratic site which contains 5 residues: the catalytic triad (Ser-200, Glu-327, His-440), Phe-288 and Phe-290. This esteratic site lies at the bottom of the active narrow gorge which is nearly about 20 A° long and 14 aromatic residues line a substantial portion (40%) of the gorge surface among them (Trp-84, Tyr-130, Phe-330, Phe-331). PAS is containing 5 residues (Tyr-70, Asp-72, Tyr-121, Trp-279, Tyr-334). Binding to PAS causes conformational change of AChE and prevents the passage of AChE through the narrow gorge. Another important site is the oxyanion hole which has (Gly-118, Gly-119 and Ala 201) residues that plays a remarkable role in high-energy intermediates stabilization and the transition state by hydrogen bond [63, 67]. Furthermore the catalytic anionic site which has (Asn-85, Ser-122, Glu-199) residues [68]. As shown in (Fig 6), aurasperone A has the highest docking score (-14.29 Kcal/mol) and could bind through three hydrogen bonds between methoxy group at C-8 with Asp-72, methoxy group at C-8’ with Asn-85 and methyl group at C-2 with Phe-331, in addition to hydrophobic-H bond with Phe-331. Fonsecinone A which is an isomer of aurasperone A has a lower docking score (-11.18 Kcal/mol) which may be due to difference in the arrangement of pyrone at naphthalene ring. Fonsecinone A could have three hydrogen bonds with the active sites one between hydroxyl group at C-5 with Tyr-70. The second is between carbonyl group at C-4’ with Phe-288 and Lie-287, in addition to hydrophobic-H bond with Tyr-334. Rubrofusarin B has a docking score (-11.73 Kcal/mol) could bind by only two hydrogen bonds between hydroxyl group at C-5 with Ser-122 and methyl group at C-2 with Glu-199. The absence of binding to PAS, active site gorge of rubrofusarin B and formation of only two hydrogen bonds may explain the decrease in the docking score of rubrofusarin B. Aspernigrin A has the least docking score (10.18 Kcal/mol). It could bind by two hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl group at C-14 with Phe-288 and the N-atom with Phe-330, also hydrophobic-H bond with Phe-330 has observed. Lacking of naphtho-γ-pyrone and two hydrogen bonds only may account for the low activity of aspernigrin A.

Fig 6. Binding residues of (1) flavasperone, (2) rubrofusarin B, (3) aurasperone A, (4) fonsecinone A and (5) aspernigrin A in AChE assay using MOE program.

Fig 6

Dashed yellow lines indicate H-bonds in 3D ligand interaction diagram and blue ones in 2D diagram. Carbons are in turquoise, nitrogens in blue, and oxygens in red.

Some features of structure/activity relationship (SAR) of the isolated compounds could be included as follow; bis-naphtho-γ-pyrones are more active than naphtho-γ-pyrones [37, 69], linear naphtho-γ-pyrones are more active than angular naphtho-γ-pyrones, presence of methoxy group at C-8, 8’, hydroxyl group at C-5 and methyl group at C-2 seem essential for AChE inhibition. Our results were consistent with previous studies regarding the correlation between methoxy group at C-6, C-7, C-8 and the arrangement of pyrone at naphthalene ring [51]. It is worthy to note that carbonyl with neighboring phenolic OH in these compounds can provide them with antioxidant as well as ability to chelate some heavy metals as predicted from behavior of other natural compounds sharing similar pyrone ring as flavones and xanthones. This probably could support their potential as promising anti-AD agents [70, 71].

The mechanism by which AgNPs inhibit AChE is believed to be due to structural perturbation of the enzyme. This inhibition may be ascribed to AChE adsorption on nanoparticle surface and subsequent bracing of enzyme structure. Change in the distribution of surface charge on the enzyme and induction of H2S synthesizing enzymes can also contribute to the AChE inhibition [72, 73]. Most proteins have strong adsorption at the solid–water interface, and adsorption of enzymes on AgNPs can result in inactivation due to conformational change [74]. Despite some reports of in vivo neurotoxicity of AgNPs probably through alteration of the permeability of blood brain barrier cells thereby stimulating the oxidative stress in the nerve cells [7577]; their mechanism is still not fully understood. Several metallic nanoparticles were reported to exhibit in vivo neuroprotective and memory enhancing activity without noticeable toxicity such as gold [78], iron [79], silver [22]. Gold nanoparticles, in particular, were proved to reduce accumulation of amyloid β-peptides, while iron nanoparticles reduced tau protein aggregation. Optimizing AgNPs by reducing the size to 0.1 nm (1 A°) revealed better biological activity and lower toxicity [80]. The combined action of AgNps with naphthopyrones that have favourable AChEI, antioxidant anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic and chelating activities could open up a new horizon for possible development of drugs for alleviation of Alzheimer’s disease.

5. Conclusion

The present study displayed the ability of aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin Ato synthesize spherical, stable, and well-dispersed AgNPs with size ranging from 8–30 nm in diameter. They were coated with the isolated natural compounds. AgNPs dramatically enhanced the inhibitory activity of aurasperone A, fonsecinone A and aspernigrin Aon AChE more efficiently than the other examined derivatives. Further investigation of the in vitro neuroprotective properties of the naphtho-γ-pyrones dimers is suggested to augment the profile of their potential anti-AD activity. It is meaningful to harness the fungal ability to produce sustainable, abundant naphtho-γ-pyrone compounds and further study their in vivo activities before and after coating/combining with proper nano-metallic particles. These natural compounds with renewable fungal source possess several beneficial structural and biological characteristics, thus rendering them as promising multi-target potential drugs for Alzheimer’s disease.

Supporting information

S1 File

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Mohamed El-Metwally for his help in collecting and identifying the marine specimens. [Prof. Dr/ Tarek A. Abdelaziz] passed away before the submission of the final version of this manuscript. [Ghada Mahmoud Abdelwahab] accepts responsibility for the integrity and validity of the data collected and analyzed.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Alzheimer’s Association Report. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2017;13(4):325–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Briggs R, Kennelly SP, O’Neill D. Drug treatments in Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical medicine. 2016;16(3):247. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mossello E, Ballini E. Management of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacological treatment and quality of life. Therapeutic advances in chronic disease. 2012;3(4):183–93. doi: 10.1177/2040622312452387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murphy MP, LeVine H III. Alzheimer’s disease and the amyloid-β peptide. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2010;19(1):311–23. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bloom GS. Amyloid-β and tau: the trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. JAMA neurology. 2014;71(4):505–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weller J, Budson A. Current understanding of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and treatment. F1000Research. 2018;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14506.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crous-Bou M, Minguillón C, Gramunt N, Molinuevo JL. Alzheimer’s disease prevention: from risk factors to early intervention. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy. 2017;9(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0297-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vassar R. BACE1 inhibitor drugs in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s research & therapy. 2014;6(9):89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cummings JL, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimer’s research & therapy. 2014;6(4):1–7. doi: 10.1186/alzrt269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aliev G, Priyadarshini M, Reddy V P, Grieg NH, Kaminsky Y, Cacabelos R, et al. Oxidative stress mediated mitochondrial and vascular lesions as markers in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Current medicinal chemistry. 2014;21(19):2208–17. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666131227161303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kamat PK, Kalani A, Rai S, Swarnkar S, Tota S, Nath C, et al. Mechanism of oxidative stress and synapse dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: understanding the therapeutics strategies. Molecular neurobiology. 2016;53(1):648–61. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-9053-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pohanka M. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease as a target for therapy. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(9):535–43. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2018_097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tarafdar J, Sharma S, Raliya R. Nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary science of applications. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2013;12(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nazem A, Mansoori GA. Nanotechnology for Alzheimer’s disease detection and treatment. Insciences J. 2011;1(4):169–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Logothetidis S. Nanotechnology in medicine: the medicine of tomorrow and nanomedicine. Hippokratia. 2006;10(1):7–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nikalje AP. Nanotechnology and its applications in medicine. Med chem. 2015;5(2):081–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Naqvi S, Panghal A, Flora S. Nanotechnology: a promising approach for delivery of neuroprotective drugs. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020;14. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Silva GA. Nanotechnology approaches for the regeneration and neuroprotection of the central nervous system. Surgical Neurology. 2005;63(4):301–6. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leszek J, Md Ashraf G, Tse WH, Zhang J, Gasiorowski K, Avila-Rodriguez MF, et al. Nanotechnology for Alzheimer Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(11):1182–9. Epub 2017/02/07. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170203125008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Havel H, Finch G, Strode P, Wolfgang M, Zale S, Bobe I, et al. Nanomedicines: from bench to bedside and beyond. The AAPS journal. 2016;18(6):1373–8. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9961-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen X, Schluesener HJ. Nanosilver: a nanoproduct in medical application. Toxicology letters. 2008;176(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Youssif KA, Haggag EG, Elshamy AM, Rabeh MA, Gabr NM, Seleem A, et al. Anti-Alzheimer potential, metabolomic profiling and molecular docking of green synthesized silver nanoparticles of Lampranthus coccineus and Malephora lutea aqueous extracts. PloS one. 2019;14(11):e0223781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ge L, Li Q, Wang M, Ouyang J, Li X, Xing MM. Nanosilver particles in medical applications: synthesis, performance, and toxicity. International journal of nanomedicine. 2014;9:2399. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S55015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khan SU, Saleh TA, Wahab A, Khan MHU, Khan D, Khan WU, et al. Nanosilver: new ageless and versatile biomedical therapeutic scaffold. International journal of nanomedicine. 2018;13:733. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S153167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iravani S, Korbekandi H, Mirmohammadi SV, Zolfaghari B. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: chemical, physical and biological methods. Research in pharmaceutical sciences. 2014;9(6):385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khatoon A, Khan F, Ahmad N, Shaikh S, Rizvi SMD, Shakil S, et al. Silver nanoparticles from leaf extract of Mentha piperita: eco-friendly synthesis and effect on acetylcholinesterase activity. Life sciences. 2018;209:430–4. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verma SK, Jha E, Sahoo B, Panda PK, Thirumurugan A, Parashar S, et al. Mechanistic insight into the rapid one-step facile biofabrication of antibacterial silver nanoparticles from bacterial release and their biogenicity and concentration-dependent in vitro cytotoxicity to colon cells. RSC advances. 2017;7(64):40034–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Husain S, Verma SK, Azam M, Sardar M, Haq Q, Fatma T. Antibacterial efficacy of facile cyanobacterial silver nanoparticles inferred by antioxidant mechanism. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021;122:111888. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Devi LS, Joshi S. Ultrastructures of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized using endophytic fungi. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure. 2015;3(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2014.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hassan S. A., Hanif E., Asif E., Anis H. & Hussain H. M. 2019. Mycobiosynthesis and characterization of silver nano particles and its antimicrobial activity. INT. J. BIOL. BIOTECH., 16: (2), 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mohammed AA. Biosynthesis and size of silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus niger ATCC 16404 as antibacterial activity. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2015;4(2):522–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sagar G, Ashok B. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Aspergillus niger and its efficacy against human pathogens. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012;2(5):1654–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Teleanu DM, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, Volceanov A, Teleanu RI. Impact of nanoparticles on brain health: An up to date overview. Journal of clinical medicine. 2018;7(12):490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Docea AO, Calina D, Buga AM, Zlatian O, Paoliello MMB, Mogosanu GD, et al. The Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Antioxidant/Pro-Oxidant Balance in a Murine Model. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2020;21(4). doi: 10.3390/ijms21041233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferdous Z, Nemmar A. Health Impact of Silver Nanoparticles: A Review of the Biodistribution and Toxicity Following Various Routes of Exposure. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nielsen KF, Mogensen JM, Johansen M, Larsen TO, Frisvad JC. Review of secondary metabolites and mycotoxins from the Aspergillus niger group. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2009;395(5):1225–42. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3081-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lima MAS, Oliveira MdCFd, Pimenta AT, Uchôa PK. Aspergillus niger: a hundred years of contribution to the natural products chemistry. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2019;30(10):2029–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yurchenko EA, Menchinskaya ES, Pislyagin EA, Trinh PTH, Ivanets EV, Smetanina OF, et al. Neuroprotective activity of some marine fungal metabolites in the 6-hydroxydopamin-and paraquat-induced parkinson’s disease models. Marine drugs. 2018;16(11):457. doi: 10.3390/md16110457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leon LLd, Caceres I, Bornot J, Choque E, Raynal J, Taillandier P, et al. Influence of the culture conditions on the production of NGPs by Aspergillus tubingensis. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;29(9):1412–23. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1905.05015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hatano T, Uebayashi H, Ito H, Shiota S, Tsuchiya T, Yoshida T. Phenolic constituents of Cassia seeds and antibacterial effect of some naphthalenes and anthraquinones on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 1999;47(8):1121–7. doi: 10.1248/cpb.47.1121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Graham JG, Zhang H, Pendland SL, Santarsiero BD, Mesecar AD, Cabieses F, et al. Antimycobacterial naphthopyrones from Senna obliqua. Journal of natural products. 2004;67(2):225–7. doi: 10.1021/np030348i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wong S-M, Wong MM, Seligmann O, Wagner H. New Antihepatotoxic Naphtho-pyrone Glycosides from the Seeds of Cassia tora. Planta medica. 1989;55(03):276–80. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sakai K, Ohte S, Ohshiro T, Matsuda D, Masuma R, Rudel LL, et al. Selective inhibition of acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase 2 isozyme by flavasperone and sterigmatocystin from Aspergillus species. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2008;61(9):568–72. doi: 10.1038/ja.2008.76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu K, Guo C, Meng J, Tian H, Guo S, Shi D. Discovery of natural dimeric naphthopyrones as potential cytotoxic agents through ROS-mediated apoptotic pathway. Marine drugs. 2019;17(4):207. doi: 10.3390/md17040207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Choi JS, Lee HJ, Park K-Y, Ha J-O, Kang SS. In vitro antimutagenic effects of anthraquinone aglycones and naphthopyrone glycosides from Cassia tora. Planta medica. 1997;63(01):11–4. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kitanaka S, Nakayama T, Shibano T, Ohkoshi E. Antiallergic agent from natural sources. Structures and inhibitory effect of histamine release of naphthopyrone glycosides from seeds of Cassia obtusifolia. Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin. 1998;46(10):1650–2. doi: 10.1248/cpb.46.1650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Choque E, El Rayess Y, Raynal J, Mathieu F. Fungal naphtho-γ-pyrones—secondary metabolites of industrial interest. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2015;99(3):1081–96. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6295-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Carboué Q, Maresca M, Herbette G, Roussos S, Hamrouni R, Bombarda I. Naphtho-Gamma-Pyrones Produced by Aspergillus tubingensis G131: New Source of Natural Nontoxic Antioxidants. Biomolecules. 2020;10(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ojha R, Singh J, Ojha A, Singh H, Sharma S, Nepali K. An updated patent review: xanthine oxidase inhibitors for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout (2011–2015). Expert opinion on therapeutic patents. 2017;27(3):311–45. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2017.1261111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fang W, Lin X, Wang J, Liu Y, Tao H, Zhou X. Asperpyrone-type bis-naphtho-γ-pyrones with COX-2–inhibitory activities from marine-derived fungus Aspergillus niger. Molecules. 2016;21(7):941. doi: 10.3390/molecules21070941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shrestha S, Seong SH, Paudel P, Jung HA, Choi JS. Structure related inhibition of enzyme systems in cholinesterases and BACE1 in vitro by naturally occurring naphthopyrone and its glycosides isolated from Cassia obtusifolia. Molecules. 2018;23(1):69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Featherstone RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochemical pharmacology. 1961;7(2):88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chauhan RP, Gupta C, Prakash D. Methodological advancements in green nanotechnology and their applications in biological synthesis of herbal nanoparticles. International Journal of Bioassays (IJB). 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sallam A, Mira A, Ashour A, Shimizu K. Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors and melanin synthesis inhibitors from Salvia officinalis. Phytomedicine. 2016;23(10):1005–11. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ghazilou A, Koochaknejad E, Ershadifar H, Negarestan H, Kor K, Baskaleh G. Infestation biology of Phallusia nigra (Tunicata, Phlebobranchia) on hard corals in a subtropical bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2019;626:135–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kjer J, Debbab A, Aly AH, Proksch P. Methods for isolation of marine-derived endophytic fungi and their bioactive secondary products. Nature protocols. 2010;5(3):479–90. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Akiyama K, Teraguchi S, Hamasaki Y, Mori M, Tatsumi K, Ohnishi K, et al. New Dimeric Naphthopyrones from Aspergillus niger. Journal of natural Products. 2003;66(1):136–9. doi: 10.1021/np020174p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Campos FR, Barison A, Daolio C, Ferreira AG, Rodrigues-Fo E. Complete 1H and 13C NMR assignments of aurasperone A and fonsecinone A, two bis-naphthopyrones produced by Aspergillus aculeatus. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. 2005;43(11):962–5. doi: 10.1002/mrc.1654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gorst-Allman DP, Stern PS, Rabie CJ. Structural elucidation of the nigerones, four new naphthopyrones from cultures of Aspergillus niger. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions. 1980:2474–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ye YH, Zhu HL, Song YC, Liu JY, Tan RX. Structural Revision of Aspernigrin A, Reisolated from Cladosporium herbarum IFB-E002. Journal of natural products. 2005;68(7):1106–8. doi: 10.1021/np050059p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kennedy AJ, Chappell MA, Bednar AJ, Ryan AC, Laird JG, Stanley JK, et al. Impact of Organic Carbon on the Stability and Toxicity of Fresh and Stored Silver Nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012;46(19):10772–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mukherjee PK, Kumar V, Mal M, Houghton PJ. In vitro acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of the essential oil from Acorus calamus and its main constituents. Planta medica. 2007;73(3):283. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mira A, Yamashita S, Katakura Y, Shimizu K. In vitro neuroprotective activities of compounds from Angelica shikokiana Makino. Molecules. 2015;20(3):4813–32. doi: 10.3390/molecules20034813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sastry M, Mayya K, Bandyopadhyay K. pH Dependent changes in the optical properties of carboxylic acid derivatized silver colloidal particles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1997;127(1–3):221–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ashraf JM, Ansari MA, Khan HM, Alzohairy MA, Choi I. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and characterization of their inhibitory effects on AGEs formation using biophysical techniques. Scientific reports. 2016;6:20414. doi: 10.1038/srep20414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li H, Zhang L. Photocatalytic performance of different exposed crystal facets of BiOCl. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2017;6:48–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Harel M, Schalk I, Ehret-Sabatier L, Bouet F, Goeldner M, Hirth C, et al. Quaternary ligand binding to aromatic residues in the active-site gorge of acetylcholinesterase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1993;90(19):9031–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sussman JL, Silman I. Acetylcholinesterase: structure and use as a model for specific cation—protein interactions. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 1992;2(5):721–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lu S, Tian J, Sun W, Meng J, Wang X, Fu X, et al. Bis-naphtho-γ-pyrones from fungi and their bioactivities. Molecules. 2014;19(6):7169–88. doi: 10.3390/molecules19067169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Korkina LG, Afanas’ Ev IB. Antioxidant and chelating properties of flavonoids. Advances in pharmacology. 1996;38:151–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cruz I, Puthongking P, Cravo S, Palmeira A, Cidade H, Pinto M, et al. Xanthone and flavone derivatives as dual agents with acetylcholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant activity as potential anti-alzheimer agents. Journal of Chemistry. 2017;2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Šinko G, Vrček IV, Goessler W, Leitinger G, Dijanošić A, Miljanić S. Alteration of cholinesterase activity as possible mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2014;21(2):1391–400. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2016-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gonzalez-Carter DA, Leo BF, Ruenraroengsak P, Chen S, Goode AE, Theodorou IG, et al. Silver nanoparticles reduce brain inflammation and related neurotoxicity through induction of H2S-synthesizing enzymes. Scientific reports. 2017;7:42871. doi: 10.1038/srep42871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sinegani AAS, Emtiazi G, Shariatmadari H. Sorption and immobilization of cellulase on silicate clay minerals. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2005;290(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Baruwati B, Simmons SO, Varma RS, Veronesi B. “Green” synthesized and coated nanosilver alters the membrane permeability of barrier (intestinal, brain endothelial) cells and stimulates oxidative stress pathways in neurons. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2013;1(7):753–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Feng X, Chen A, Zhang Y, Wang J, Shao L, Wei L. Central nervous system toxicity of metallic nanoparticles. International journal of nanomedicine. 2015;10:4321. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S78308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tang J, Xiong L, Wang S, Wang J, Liu L, Li J, et al. Influence of silver nanoparticles on neurons and blood-brain barrier via subcutaneous injection in rats. Applied Surface Science. 2008;255(2):502–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hou K, Zhao J, Wang H, Li B, Li K, Shi X, et al. Chiral gold nanoparticles enantioselectively rescue memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature communications. 2020;11(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sonawane SK, Ahmad A, Chinnathambi S. Protein-capped metal nanoparticles inhibit tau aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease. ACS omega. 2019;4(7):12833–40. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Xu L, Wang Y-Y, Huang J, Chen C-Y, Wang Z-X, Xie H. Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, medical applications and biosafety. Theranostics. 2020;10(20):8996. doi: 10.7150/thno.45413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yogendra Kumar Mishra

1 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-05273

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus Niger

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Abdelwahab,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that CAREFULLY addresses the points raised during the review process. Referees might have suggested some literature citations, authors are free to decide upon.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 16 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Ph. D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the present work Abdelwahab et. Al. described the separation and characterization of six naphtho-�-pyrones (2 monomers and 4 dimers) and one pyridine-4-one alkaloid from solid culture of marine-derived Aspergillus niger for application in acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity (AChEI). Further Ag nanoparticles were also synthesized and tested for AChEI. The results are interesting. However, there are some defects needed to be further revised. Including:

1. Characterization of Ag NPs are poor. Authors should provide XRD, Raman and XPS analysis for proper characterization.

2. There is absent of mechanism interpretation and analysis to support the conclusion

3. The quality of ALL OF FIGURES should be further decorated. The following literature should be consulted and employed:

4. The English should be carefully polished. Also, many format problems should be addressed.

ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2020, 6, 5527–5537; Theranostics, 2020, 10, 7841-7856; Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2020, 16, 283-303.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript entitiled “Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus Niger” submitted by Abdelwahab et al is an nice submission regarding advancement in nanotechnology. The idea , concept and the methodology of the manuscript is novel as well as well defined however as manuscript , it consist of many flaws that needs to be corrected before acceptance. The comments are :

1. The whole manuscript should be screened and rewritten with proper English. The quality of the English is really poor which is ruining the quality of the work.

2. Abstract needs to be rewritten defining the novelty of work with some quantitative data.

3. The first para of the introduction is full of typos and grammatical error. Moreover, the content are rewritten. `This paragraph must be rewritten with a full formatting.

4. Paragraph 3, Write the hypothesis of the work and the novelty.

5. Number of recent manuscript has been published in silver nanoparticles, Authors should cite the recent papers. Some of the suggestion are in the last comment.

6. Don’t keep the section 2.3. It looks odd to give heading and saying it has been mentioned previously.

7. Combine section 2.4 and 2.5 under one subheading.

8. Section 2.9, use proper annotations and numerical.

9. Materials and methods section needs to be written in more details.

10. Please don’t use compound number in result section. Use the full name or an short name of the compound.

11. Table 1 needs to be presented as an graph. It should be not presented in this way. What was the SPR peak of the scan?

12. Figure 2 needs to be redrawn. The resolution is too poor.

13. Table 2 is not OK. Description and data is not matching.

14. Figure 4 is not okay.. resolution needs to be improved.

15. Where is the discussion? The authors has no where defined and discussed the significance of their finding. It seems that the manuscript is incomplete.

16. Lastly, the authors are suggested to cite recent papers like DOI: 10.1039/C7RA05943D, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfx204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.037,https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1503598 , DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.111888 , DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104535 , DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2020-0138, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100299; DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100345; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01522

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257071.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Jun 2021

Reviewer #1:.

1- (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis is used to check the crystalline nature of silver nanoparticles. So, it should be done on the dried powder. In our case, after lyophilization, it was a sticky material at the end of the wasserman test tube (as seen in Figure 3) because the amount of starting compound entering the synthesis was very little so, it cannot be in a crystal or powder form. In addition, other published papers performed (XRD) analysis because they used total extract in green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Consequently, they have large amount but in our experiment we used pure isolated compounds with little yield.

(b) XPS is used for elemental analysis using solid surface and Raman is used for chemical structure identification as well as detection of contamination and impurities and give information about phase and polymorphism. In case of silver nanoparticles synthesized by total extract, Raman and XPS were performed as the total extract may contain different organic metabolites and other elements as impurities but here we used pure organic compounds which were isolated by pure organic solvents as proved by their NMR data attached in the supplementary file. Therefore, the probability of the presence of other elements is almost non-existent. Also these analyses are too expensive in our country due to low facilities and lack of funding. There is only one available equipment and it is reserved for several months.

2- Regarding the mechanism interpretation and analysis to support the conclusion; the effect of silver nanoparticles alone on acetylcholine esterase enzyme was performed and its IC50 is 2.29 ± 0.013 uM/ml. This confirms that the pure isolated organic compounds have synergistic effect on acetylcholine esterase inhibition after capping with silver nanoparticles possibly by stabilizing them for a longer time to exert its effect.

3- The quality of all figures was improved and resolution was adjusted between 300-600 dpi to meet PLOS ONE's style figure requirements.

Reviewer #2:

1- The whole manuscript was screened and some were rewritten with proper English.

2- Abstract was rewritten defining the novelty of work with some quantitative data.

3- The first paragraph was revised with a full formatting.

4- In paragraph 3, the hypothesis and the novelty of the work were added.

5- Some recent papers of your suggestions were added.

6- Section 2.3 was added to section 2.2.

7- Section 2.5 was combined with section 2.4 under one sub-heading.

8- Proper annotations were used as possible as we can.

9- Some details were added in Methods section.

10- The compound number was replaced by the full name of the compound in the result section.

11- Table 1 presented as a graph in Figure 4. The SPR was between 440 to 462 nm and was added to the manuscript.

12- Figure 2 was changed to Figure 3 and was re-drawn. The resolution was adjusted between 300-600 dpi to meet PLOS ONE's style figure requirements.

13- Table 2 became Table 1 and was revised.

14- Figure 4 became Figure 6 and was re-drawn. The resolution was adjusted between 300-600 dpi to meet PLOS ONE's style figure requirements.

15- Discussion was revised, clarified and significance of the findings was discussed in section 3.3

16- Recent papers were cited.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mohammad Shahid

16 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-05273R1

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus niger

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Abdelwahab,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 30 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Shahid, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The author has tried to response the queries well however, the discussion part is still not convincing. Authors are suggested to describe the results in a how and why pattern. Right now , only results are there. I will suggest them to separate the result and discussion section and provide a detail discussion.

In my opinion, its a crucial part for any manuscript and can't be ignored. Manuscript may be accepted after that followed by review.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257071.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


21 Aug 2021

Response to reviewers

1- Adressed to reviewer #2. (Previous round).

2- Adressed to reviewer #2. (Technically sound).

3- Adressed to reviewer #2. (Statistical analysis).

4- Adressed to reviewer #2. (Data availability).

5- Adressed to reviewer #2. (Standard English).

6- The reviewer suggested a more focus on discussion part and separate it from results which were actullay did. The results (P.6) and discussion (P.9) section was separated and the results were described in how and why pattern. Really, it is a crucial part. Thank you for your opinion and effort.

7- This item also was addressed to reviewer #2.

We did our maximum efforts to improve the manuscript guided by editor and reviewers' comments and we hope that the final version will be satisfactory for respected editor and reviewers.

Thank you

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Mohammad Shahid

24 Aug 2021

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus niger

PONE-D-21-05273R2

Dear Dr. Abdelwahab,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Shahid, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed now all the queries and nicely revised the manuscript. The manuscript can now be accepted followed by the supervision of editor.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Mohammad Shahid

31 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-05273R2

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitory activity of green synthesized nanosilver by naphthopyrones isolated from marine-derived Aspergillus niger

Dear Dr. Abdelwahab:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mohammad Shahid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES