Platinum (Pt) and other platinum group elements (PGE), including palladium (Pd), iridium (Ir), rhodium (Rh), ruthenium (Ru), and osmium (Os), have many advantageous characteristics, including catalytic properties, corrosion resistance, and high melting points (Table 1), which lend themselves to various applications ranging from automotive catalysts to pharmaceutics to use in jewelry (1). In particular, the chemical behavior of PGE is quite unique: On the one hand, they are inert and highly resistant to corrosion by most chemicals; on the other hand, they can serve as catalysts, accelerating the rates of many petrochemical reactions. However, PGE have very low elemental abundances in Earth's crust, all at part per billion (ppb) levels (Table 1) (2, 3). Hence, PGE-bearing ore deposits are a critical resource, and their extracted PGE metals are highly sought after by modern industries. To effectively utilize sparse PGE resources, it is essential to understand the formation of PGE ore deposits for their targeted exploration and to develop efficient chemical approaches for PGE extraction and separation.
Table 1.
Some characteristics of PGE and associated Au
| PGE or Au | Z | Melting point (°C) | Abundance in Earth's crust (ppb) | Metallic radius (Å) | Valence electron configuration |
| Pt | 78 | 1,768 | 5 | 1.39 | 6s25d84f14 |
| Ir | 77 | 2,446 | 1 | 1.36 | 6s25d74f14 |
| Os | 76 | 3,033 | 1.5 | 1.35 | 6s25d64f14 |
| Pd | 46 | 1,555 | 15 | 1.37 | 4d10 |
| Rh | 45 | 1,964 | 1 | 1.34 | 5s14d8 |
| Ru | 44 | 2,334 | 1 | 1.34 | 5s14d7 |
| Au | 79 | 1,064 | 4 | 1.44 | 6s15d104f14 |
Although the natural abundances of PGE are low, fortunately, they are not evenly distributed within Earth and other planets. Because of their aversion to bonding with oxygen and their high affinity for reduced sulfur, PGE tend to either occur in the metallic state (siderophile, metal loving) or bond with sulfur or other group VA and VIA ligands (chalcophile, sulfur loving) to form mineral components (4). Consequently, PGE are concentrated in core-forming Fe-Ni alloys and in sulfide phases of PGE-bearing ore deposits (5). This distinct behavior of PGE, as well as their radioisotope systematics, can serve as indicators of many geological processes such as early solar system evolution, and planetary differentiation and formation (6).
Of critical importance to PGE-bearing ore deposits is the enrichment of PGE in Fe-Ni-Cu sulfide minerals, originating from the high extraction of PGE by sulfide liquids with respect to coexisting silicate magmas during ore deposit formation (5). Although several basic types of PGE deposits have been recognized, many aspects of PGE ore formation, especially the role of hydrothermal fluids, are not well known. Specifically, the three interrelated key properties of a hydrothermal system—solute speciation, solid phase solubility, and aqueous complex stability—and their variations with temperature, pressure, and fluid chemistry need to be thoroughly addressed for PGE-containing systems. The majority of previous studies on aqueous solutions of PGE, especially PtII, have focused on their complexation with common ligands such as Cl−, OH−, and SO42− (7–9). However, the obtained concentrations of aqueous Pt species in equilibrium with Pt-bearing minerals are too low to explain the Pt mobility observed in many hydrothermal−magmatic fluids. Although hydrogen sulfide (HS–) complexes have been investigated as plausible agents to transport Pt [as well as associated Au, also a chalcophile element (10)], there is a large range in the reported solubility data for Pt sulfide solid phases, spanning almost four orders of magnitude under different redox conditions (11–14). Therefore, it is conceivable that other Pt aqueous species may be largely responsible for Pt transport at hydrothermal conditions.
In a PNAS contribution, Pokrovski et al. (11) identify a ligand with which Pt complexes in hydrothermal fluids—trisulfur radical ion S3•−—using in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and solubility experiments combined with atomistic and thermodynamic simulations. More specifically, Pt L3-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy coupled with quantum chemical simulations reveal that, in a sulfur-bearing aqueous solution at 275 °C and 700 bar with fO2 = HM–0.2 (expressed in log10 [bars] scale relative to the hematite−magnetite [HM] buffer) and pH = 5.9, PtII complexes with the previously recognized HS− and the newly identified S3•− to form four-coordinated, square-planar PtII(HS)2(S3)22–. By contrast, in a more acidic and oxidized solution (fO2 = HM+0.8; pH = 4.9) at the same pressure−temperature conditions, PtIV complexes with HS−, S3•−, and H2O to form six-coordinated, octahedral PtIV(HS)3(H2O)(S3)2–. Further extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analyses show systematic increases in the first-shell mean Pt-S distance and coordination number with increasing fO2 and decreasing pH, indicating coexistence of the PtII and PtIV species in different proportions in solutions of varying fO2 and pH. EXAFS data also reveal the occurrence of second-shell S atoms, which is in agreement with the presence of the S3•− ligand in both types of Pt species. These results are further corroborated by PtS(s) solubility measurements combined with thermodynamic modeling. Compared with HS– complexes, Pt(HS)n2−n, commonly assumed to form in the literature (12, 13), the newly identified PtII(HS)2(S3)22– and PtIV(HS)3(H2O)(S3)2– species can enhance PtS(s) solubility by four to five orders of magnitude under similar conditions (11). This finding helps explain observed PGE enrichment in hydrothermal sulfide deposits of common metals (Cu, Mo, Zn, Au, and Ag), whereas earlier models based only on conventional sulfide and chloride ligands cannot (11). In fact, the S3•− and HS− ligands have also been found, by Pokrovski et al., to coordinate with Au to form soluble and stable Au(HS)S3– in S-rich hydrothermal fluids (10). Therefore, S3•−, which is ubiquitous in a range of systems (15), likely plays a key role in the aqueous speciation of PGE and related metals at hydrothermal conditions and in the eventual formation of their ore deposits, despite the presence of more common ligands such as Cl−.
Although both the HS− and S3•− ligands participate in Pt speciation in hydrothermal fluids, the affinity of PtII for S3•− is much higher than for HS− (11). Calculation of the equilibrium constant of the ligand exchange reaction Pt(HS)42– + 2 S3•− = Pt(HS)2(S3)22– + 2 HS− at 300 °C and 500 bar yields a value of 108.7, implying that PtII is at least ∼104 times more likely to bond to S3•− than to HS− in these conditions (11). Such remarkable affinity of PtII for S3•− can be explained by the electronic/molecular structures of PtII and S3•−, resulting in the energetically favorable bonding configuration of Pt(HS)2(S3)22–. In contrast, the chemical affinities of AuI for S3•− and HS− in Au(HS)S3– are very similar, although Au is next to Pt in the periodic table and both are siderophile elements (10). Thus, subtle differences in the electronic structures of PGE and other coexisting metal atoms can result in significant disparities in their bonding behavior with S3•−. Given the systematic variations of PGE in their valence electron configurations (Table 1), it is possible that PGE may form different bonding configurations with S3•−. In particular, since Pt, Pd, and Ir are more chalcophile than Ru, Rh, and Os (11), the prior subgroup may have higher tendencies to complex with S3•− than the latter, rendering S3•− a potentially effective ligand for fractionation of these two PGE subgroups in natural S-rich hydrothermal fluids and for their separation and purification for technological applications.
The discovery of the [Pt-S3–]- and [Au-S3–]-type complexes by Pokrovski et al. (10, 11) relies heavily on in situ synchrotron XAS using a hydrothermal apparatus. With advances in synchrotron sources/instrumentation and the development of various sample environment cells, synchrotron X-ray scattering has increasingly allowed for unprecedented, in situ, real-time structural studies. Future research directions include 1) measurements of additional elements, including PGE other than Pt, which will determine whether there are systematics in [M-S3–]-type (M, metal) configurations as a function of M; and 2) optimization of hydrothermal cells to access the higher pressure−temperature regime of hydrothermal−magmatic systems, where both S3•− and its higher-temperature (>500 °C) counterpart, S2•−, may complex with Pt and other metals (11). Hydrothermal diamond anvil cell (HDAC), which can achieve temperatures/pressures up to 1,200 °C/25 kbar, has previously been combined with XAS to investigate transition metal-, rare-earth− and actinide-containing fluids (16–18), but XAS/HDAC has not yet been used to study aqueous PGE species.
In addition to XAS, other spectroscopic techniques, in particular, Raman and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, have been employed to measure aqueous species in various temperature, pressure, and chemical conditions. For example, Raman spectroscopy combined with HDAC was used to probe sulfur speciation in aqueous fluid-silicate melt systems (19) and to characterize uranyl chloride complexes in hydrothermal solutions (20). Together with in situ XAS studies, these techniques have allowed us to identify species that are stable only in extreme environments. In addition to novel complexes involving nontraditional ligands such as S3•−, as described above, a variety of species in which a metal cation is bonded with one or more common ligands, such as Cl−, OH−, and SO42−, have been identified at hydrothermal conditions. In some cases, such species (e.g., UO2Cl20) tend to be lowly or neutrally charged, presumably due to decreases in water's dielectric constant with increasing temperature and thus weakening in the shielding of charged aqueous species in hot water (18, 20). Hence, many metal elements that are traditionally considered “immobile” based on room/low-temperature solubility data may actually be quite mobile at hydrothermal conditions, thereby explaining the wide occurrence of hydrothermal deposits with relatively high metal concentrations.
Acknowledgments
My research is supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). LANL, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is managed by Triad National Security Administration of the US Department of Energy under Contract 89233218CNA000001. I am grateful to Donald Hickmott and Chelsea Neil for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Footnotes
The author declares no competing interest.
See companion article, “The trisulfur radical ion S3•− controls platinum transport by hydrothermal fluids,” 10.1073/pnas.2109768118.
References
- 1.Zientek M. L., Loferski P. J., Parks H. L., Schulte R. F., Seal R. R. II, Platinum-group elements (Prof. Pap. 1802-N, US Geological Survey, 2017).
- 2.Averill B., Eldredge P., Chemistry: Principles, Patterns, and Applications (Pearson Education, 2007). [Google Scholar]
- 3.“Abundance of elements in the Earth’s crust and in the sea” in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Haynes W. M., Ed. (CRC, ed. 97, 2016), pp. 14–17. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brenan J. M., The platinum-group elements: “Admirably adapted” for science and industry. Elements 4, 227–232 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mungail J. E., Naldrett A. J., Ore deposits of the platinum-group elements. Elements 4, 253–258 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Palme H., Platinum-group elements in cosmochemistry. Elements 4, 233–238 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sassani D. C., Shock E. L., Solubility and transport of platinum-group elements in supercritical fluids: Summary and estimates of thermodynamic properties for ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, and platinum solids, aqueous ions, and complexes to 1000°C and 5 kbar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 2643–2671 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bazarkina E. F., Pokrovski G. S., Hazemann J.-L., Structure, stability and geochemical role of palladium chloride complexes in hydrothermal fluids. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 146, 107–131 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tagirov B. R., et al., Platinum transport in chloride-bearing fluids and melts: Insights from in-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and thermodynamic modeling. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 254, 86–101 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pokrovski G. S., et al., Sulfur radical species form gold deposits on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 13484–13489 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pokrovski G. S., et al., The trisulfur radical ion S3•− controls platinum transport by hydrothermal fluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2109768118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gammons C. H., Bloom M. S., Experimental investigation of the hydrothermal geochemistry of platinum and palladium: II. The solubility of PtS and PdS in aqueous sulfide solutions to 300°C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 2451–2467 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Filimonova O. N., et al., The solubility of cooperate PtS(cr) at 25 − 450 °C, Psat –1000 bar and hydrosulfide complexing of platinum in hydrothermal fluids. Chem. Geol. 559, 119968 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pan P., Wood S. A., Solubility of Pt and Pd sulfides and Au metal in aqueous bisulfide solutions. II. Results at 200° to 350°C and saturated vapor pressure. Min. Depos. 29, 373–390 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chivers T., Elder P. J. W., Ubiquitous trisulfur radical anion: Fundamentals and applications in materials science, electrochemistry, analytical chemistry and geochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5996–6005 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bassett W. A., Anderson A. J., Mayanovic R. A., Chou I.-M., Hydrothermal diamond anvil cell for XAFS studies of first-row transition elements in aqueous solution up to super-critical conditions. Chem. Geol. 167, 3–10 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mayanovic R. A., Jayanetti S., Anderson A. J., Bassett W. A., Chou I.-M., The structure of Yb3+ aquo ion and chloro complexes in aqueous solutions at up to 500 °C and 270 MPa. J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 6591–6599 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dhakal D., et al., Design of a containment apparatus for synchrotron XAS measurements of radioactive fluid samples under high temperatures and pressures. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 083108 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colin A., et al., In situ determination of sulfur speciation and partitioning in aqueous fluid-silicate melt systems. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 14, 31–35 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dhakal D., Akram N., Mayanovic R. A., Boukhalfa H., Xu H., A study of uranyl (VI) chloride complexes in aqueous solutions under hydrothermal conditions using Raman spectroscopy. MRS Adv. 5, 2623–2629 (2020). [Google Scholar]
