Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2021 Mar 12;41(9):2337–2344. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01030-9

Maximum Vasoactive-Inotropic Score and Mortality in Extremely Premature, Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

Khyzer B Aziz 1,*, Orlyn C Lavilla 2,*, James L Wynn 2,3, Allison C Lure 2, Daniel Gipson 2, Diomel de la Cruz 2
PMCID: PMC8435049  NIHMSID: NIHMS1677942  PMID: 33712712

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the relationship between maximum vasoactive-inotropic (VISmax) and mortality in extremely premature (<29 weeks completed gestation), extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 grams) infants.

Study Design:

Single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study.

Results:

We identified 436 ELBW, <29 week, inborn infants cared for during the study period. Compared to infants with VISmax of 0, the frequency of mortality based on VISmax ranged from 3.3-fold to 46.1 fold. VISmax >30 was associated with universal mortality. Multivariable modeling that included gestational age, birth weight, and VISmax revealed significant utility to predict mortality with negative predictive value of 87.0% and positive predictive value of 84.8% [adjusted AUROC: 0.90, (0.86-0.94)] among patients that received vasoactive-inotropic treatment.

Conclusion:

VISmax is an objective measure of hemodynamic/cardiovascular support that was directly associated with mortality in extremely premature ELBW infants. The VISmax represents an important step towards neonatal precision medicine and risk-stratification of extremely premature ELBW infants.

Keywords: vasoactive-inotropic score, mortality, extremely low birth weight, preterm

Introduction

Premature, extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants are at high risk for significant morbidity and mortality1, 2, 3. Although the frequency of adverse outcomes in this population are commonly reported, there remains a critical unmet need to identify and quantify the severity of critical illness associated with outcomes of interest to improve clinical care and clinical research. Achievement of this goal is the prerequisite to neonatal precision medicine, where patient-specific factors can be used to provide the right patient with the right treatment at the right time in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Use of vasoactive-inotropic medications is common in the premature, ELBW population, yet outcomes, when reported, are often based on a binary (yes, no) exposure paradigm. Quantification of the pharmacological cardiovascular support provided to this unique population as well as the association with mortality remains unknown.

The inotropic score was initially designed by Wernovsky et al. in the Boston Circulatory Arrest Study to quantify the amount of pharmacological cardiovascular support during the postoperative period after arterial switch in term neonates and infants4, 5. Later it was expanded by Gaies et al. to include other commonly used medications, such as milrinone, vasopressin, and norepinephrine and subsequently called the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS)6. The inotropic score, VIS, and other similar adaptations that measure cardiovascular support have been used to measure illness severity in neonates and infants undergoing congenital heart surgery, septic pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), or septic adult patients admitted the medical intensive care unit (MICU)4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. In these studies, the vasopressor dose load, VIS, maximum VIS (VISmax), or various time points pertaining to the VIS have shown a direct relationship between the need for vasoactive-inotropic medications and the risk of morbidity and mortality.

Premature ELBW infants have a high risk for hemodynamic/cardiovascular dysfunction due to: i) less contractile myocardial tissue relative to older children & adults, ii) underdeveloped mechanisms which control myocyte activity, iii) immature adrenergic responses, and iv) limited ability to respond to increases in stress and metabolic demands11. We aimed to determine the association between VISmax and the risk of mortality in premature ELBW infants. We hypothesized that premature ELBW infants who had a higher VISmax would be more likely to experience mortality compared to those who had lower VISmax.

Methods

Patients

This was a single center, retrospective, observational cohort study approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to the collection of any data. Following IRB approval, an integrated data repository (IDR) of all ELBW, <29 weeks completed gestation infants admitted to the UF Health, level IV NICU between 1/2012 and 1/2020 was created. All clinical data in the electronic health record (EHR) were extracted and deposited into an IDR that was used for this work. Infants born at outside hospitals, those that survived less than 12 hours, those that had confirmed severe congenital anomalies, or those that completed <22 weeks gestation were excluded.

Case definitions

Chorioamnionitis was defined as histologic evidence of chorioamnionitis or funisitis. All-cause mortality was reported. Demographic variables and outcomes were defined as previously reported.2 Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was defined as modified Bell’s stage ≥2. Bacteremia was stratified by the timing of onset after birth (early-onset: ≤3 days of life; late-onset >3 days of life). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (SIVH) was defined as either unilateral or bilateral grade 3-4 IVH. Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) was defined as intestinal perforation without evidence of NEC. Prolonged early antibiotics was defined as ≥5 days of parenteral broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment started in the first 3 days of life.

The maximum vasoactive-inotropic score (VISmax)

Vasoactive-inotropic medication exposures during the birth encounter were identified. Medications considered vasoactive-inotropic included dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, milrinone, vasopressin and norepinephrine. For infants with vasoactive-inotropic medication exposures, the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) was calculated as follows: dopamine dose (μg/kg/min) + dobutamine dose (μg/kg/min) + 100 x epinephrine dose (μg/kg/min) + (10 x milrinone dose (μg/kg/min) + 10 x vasopressin dose (mU/kg/min) + 100 x norepinephrine dose (μg/kg/min)8. The VISmax was the maximum VIS score during the birth hospitalization.

Analytical methods

For descriptive data comparisons, we used Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test and the χ2 test for categorical data. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with quartiles (25th and 75th percentiles). Categorical variables were presented as percentages. The threshold for statistical significance was less than 0.05 for 2-sided tests. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) for mortality using the VISmax was calculated. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated with a 2-tailed p-value and 95% confidence intervals and a correlation matrix was generated. Logistic regression was performed to determine the relationship between VISmax and death (unadjusted) as well as comparisons adjusted for gestational age and birth weight using multiple logistic regression models. Negative and positive predictive values were calculated based on the multivariable model. All analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism version 8 (San Diego).

Results

We identified 559 ELBW, <29 week, infants cared for at UF Health during the study period. After exclusions [89 out-born, 7 severe congenital anomalies, 7 died in the delivery room, 11 died <12hours of life (7 received intensive care; 4 received comfort care), 1 transferred to an outside hospital at 24 days of life, and 8 remained hospitalized at the time of data extraction], 436 infants were available for study. Infants that did not receive vasoactive-inotropic medications during the birth hospitalization were used as the reference group (n=195). Median VISmax scores were not different by year of admission (p=0.49 by Kruskal-Wallis). The median VISmax, determined to be 10 among 241 patients treated with 1 or more vasoactive-inotropic medications during the birth hospitalization, was used to establish groups for demographic and clinical variable comparisons (Table 1). We did not find significant differences between groups in any maternal variables we examined. Compared to infants with a VISmax of 0 (never received vasoactive-inotropic medications) and those with a VISmax <10, infants that manifested a VISmax ≥10 were less mature, smaller, had longer length of stay among survivors, and experienced a greater frequency of complications including SIVH, SIP, prolonged early antibiotic exposure, and death. Apgar scores at 5 minutes were statistically different between patients without vasoactive-inotropic medication exposure (VISmax = 0) and both groups of patients with exposure (VISmax <10; p=0.004 or VISmax ≥10; p<0.001), but not between the groups of patients with exposure (p>0.999 by Kruskal-Wallis).

Table 1.

Cohort demographics

Total
(n=436)
VISmax = 0
(n=195)
VISmax <10
(n=119)
VISmax ≥10
(n=122)
p-
value
Maternal
Age 27 (22, 33) 26 (22, 33) 28 (23, 32) 27 (22, 33) 0.67
Race 0.78
Black 190 83 55 52
White 189 89 46 54
Other 57 23 18 16
Pregnancy induced hypertension1 134 (31%) 58 (30%) 35 (29%) 41 (34%) 0.72
Chorioamnionitis2 215/427 (50%) 103/194 (53%) 56/115 (49%) 58/120 (48%) 0.64
Preterm labor 273 (63%) 125 (64%) 72 (61%) 76 (62%) 0.81
C-section 287 (66%) 125 (64%) 87 (73%) 75 (61%) 0.13
Antenatal steroids 409 (94%) 187 (96%) 109 (92%) 113 (93%) 0.25
Neonatal
Birth weight 725 (594, 860) 825 (699, 904) 714 (590, 845) 600 (509, 709) <0.001
GA 26 (24, 27) 27 (26, 28) 25 (24, 27) 25 (24, 26) <0.001
5 minute Apgar 6 (4,7) 7 (5,8) 6 (4,7) 6 (3,7) <0.001
Male 227 (52%) 99 (51%) 62 (52%) 66 (54%) 0.85
SIVH 88 (20%) 16 (8%) 28 (24%) 44 (36%) <0.001
SIP 30 (7%) 1 (<1%) 11 (9%) 18 (15%) <0.001
≥5 days early antibiotics3 291 (67%)
EOB (n=11)
106 (54%)
EOB (n=4)
86 (72%)
EOB (n=2)
99 (81%)
EOB (n=5)
<0.001
Necrotizing enterocolitis 68 (16%) 23 (12%) 25 (21%) 20 (16%) 0.09
Late-onset bacteremia 108 (25%) 38 (19%) 36 (30%) 34 (28%) 0.07
Death 92 (21%) 4 (2%) 11 (9%) 77 (63%) <0.001
Death <4 days 41 (9%) 3 (2%) 4 (3%) 34 (28%) <0.001
Length of stay, days4 97 (82, 119) 90 (77, 109) 106 (88, 127) 112 (97, 131) <0.001
VISmax timing (days from birth) NA NA 0 (0, 4) 2 (1, 10) <0.001
VISmax to death interval (days) NA NA 3 (1, 15) 1 (1, 3) 0.18
1

maternal diagnosis of pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension

2

histologic only; 6 without records

3

or death with intention to treat

4

among survivors

EOB – early-onset bacteremia

Distribution of VISmax by gestational age and birth weight

We found an inverse relationship between the frequency of vasoactive-inotropic medication exposure and gestational age as well as birth weight (Figure 1A-D). Among infants that received vasoactive-inotropic medications, the VISmax was greatest among the most immature and smallest infants.

Figure 1. Vasoactive-inotropic medication exposure and VISmax by gestational age and birth weight.

Figure 1.

A. Exposure to vasoactive-inotropic medications was inversely proportional to gestational age and ranged from 20 to 91% (p<0.001 by Chi square). B. Exposure to vasoactive-inotropic medications was inversely proportional to birth weight and ranged from 33 to 91% (p<0.001 by Chi square). C. VISmax among only patients that received vasoactive-inotropic medications was inversely proportional to gestational age with range median values from 5 to 25 (≤23 vs all except 28; 24 vs 26, 24 vs 27; 27 vs 28; p<0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis). D. VISmax among only patients that received vasoactive-inotropic medications was inversely proportional to birth weight with range median values from 5 to 25. (<500 vs all groups except 500-599; 500-599 vs 800-899, 500-599 vs 900-999; 600-699 vs 900-999; p<0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis).

VISmax timing and mortality

Of the 241 patients with a VISmax > 0, 126 experienced the VISmax within one calendar day of birth; 181 had the VISmax within 7 calendar days of birth. Among the 92 patients that died, four infants did not receive any vasoactive-inotropic medications. Among those that died with a VISmax >0, the median age was 5 calendar days after birth (IQR 2, 15). Overall cohort mortality was 21% (92/436). Among those that did not receive any vasoactive-inotropic medications (VISmax = 0), mortality was 2.1% (4/195). The frequency of mortality increased significantly with VISmax (p<0.001 by Chi-square; Figure 2). Compared to infants with VISmax of 0, the frequency of mortality increased substantially with VISmax > 0 (3.3-fold for VISmax >0-<5; 5.1-fold for VISmax 5-<10; 13.8-fold for VISmax 10-<15; 13.8-fold for VISmax 15-<20; 23.8-fold for VISmax 20-<25; 37.7-fold for VISmax 25-30; and 46.1 fold for VISmax >30). A VISmax > 30 was associated with universal mortality.

Figure 2. Mortality by VISmax range.

Figure 2.

All-cause mortality varied significantly by 5 point VISmax intervals and ranged from 2.1% (VISmax = 0) to 100% (VISmax >30) (p<0.001 by Chi square).

Vasoactive-inotropic medication initiation patterns

Among patients that received vasoactive-inotropic medications, dopamine was almost universally (236/241, 98%) the first medication given, and monotherapy with dopamine was the most common treatment (n=102). Pre-episode hydrocortisone followed by dopamine with or without additional vasoactive-inotropic medications occurred in 28 patients. Dopamine with subsequent hydrocortisone (n=23), dopamine with subsequent epinephrine followed by hydrocortisone (n=22), and dopamine with subsequent hydrocortisone followed by epinephrine (n=14) were the most common combinations. Among those 241 patients with VISmax score >0, 118 had concurrent hydrocortisone support (65 died). 123 had no hydrocortisone at the time of the VISmax (23 died).

Modeling mortality risk using VISmax

We measured the utility of the VISmax to predict mortality among all patients (n=436) in our cohort. Unadjusted logistic regression comparing the VISmax and mortality yielded an AUROC of 0.92 (95% confidence intervals 0.88-0.95, p<0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between VISmax and death (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.62; p<0.001). Among all patients, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between VISmax and death (0.62; p<0.001) nearly approximated the correlation seen between GA and BW (0.65; p<0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model that included birth weight and gestational age alongside VISmax to predict mortality among all patients yielded a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% [adjusted AUROC: 0.94, (0.92-0.97)]. Results were very similar when only gestational age [NPV: 92.5%, PPV: 84.4%, AUROC: 0.94, (0.92-0.96)] or only birth weight [NPV: 93.0%, PPV: 84.8%, AUROC: 0.94, (0.91-.96)] were included in the model alongside VISmax to predict mortality.

Repeated analyses restricted to only those that received vasoactive-inotropic treatment using the outcome of mortality revealed comparable results for analyses using unadjusted logistic regression [VISmax and mortality; AUROC 0.88 (0.83-0.93)]. Among only the patients that received vasoactive-inotropic medications, the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between VISmax and death (0.64; p<0.001) exceeded the correlation seen between GA and BW (0.61, p<0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model that included birth weight and gestational age alongside VISmax to predict mortality among only the patients that received vasoactive-inotropic medications yielded a NPV (86.9%), PPV (84.8%) and AUROC: 0.90, (0.86-0.94) (Figure 3). Results were very similar when only gestational age [NPV: 86.0%, PPV: 84.4%, AUROC: 0.90, (0.85-0.94)] or only birth weight [NPV: 87.7%, PPV: 86.1%, AUROC: 0.90, (0.85-0.94)] were included in the model alongside VISmax to predict mortality. Repeat analyses that included hydrocortisone treatment had no effect on the model.

Figure 3. Modeling mortality risk using VISmax among those that received vasoactive-inotropic medications.

Figure 3.

A. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between variables included in the multivariable regression model. A coefficient of 0.64 was found between death and VISmax (p<0.001). B. Multivariable logistic regression to determine the relationship between death and VISmax adjusted for gestational age and birth weight yielded a negative predictive value of 87.0% and positive predictive value of 84.8%. C. Adjusted AUROC for mortality was 0.90, (95% confidence intervals 0.86-0.94).

Discussion

This study represents the largest, most comprehensively studied cohort of extremely premature, ELBW infants for which a VISmax was calculated. We found that mortality varied significantly with VISmax and was universal with a VISmax > 30. The VISmax was an easily quantifiable measure of vasoactive-inotropic support that was highly-associated with the risk of mortality within this vulnerable population. The ability to objectively and reproducibly characterize patient-specific hemodynamic support is a critical first step in neonatology that may be used in future clinical studies to improve patient classification and patient care.

The direct association between VISmax and death risk in our extremely premature ELBW cohort was similar to studies in children and adults. Gaies et al. found that a VISmax of 20-24 in the first 24 hours or VISmax of 15-19 in the subsequent 48 hours post congenital heart surgery in infants was associated with a higher risk of death (in-hospital or within 30 days of discharge), cardiac arrest, need for mechanical circulatory support, need for renal replacement therapy, or central nervous system injury relative to the “low risk” group (VISmax <3)6. Among pediatric patients with sepsis admitted to the PICU, Haque et al. found that a VISmax > 20 was associated with 100% mortality12. The VISmax scores in our cohort were higher than those of infants and children from previous studies6, 8, 12. We found 87% (58/67) of patients with a VISmax > 20 died and universal mortality occurred with a VISmax of > 30. Furthermore, we saw an inverse relationship between vasoactive-inotropic support relative to gestational age and birth weight. Taken together, our VISmax and associated mortality data are similar to results in adults and children, and the higher scores seen in our cohort do not readily support an early path to palliation or comfort care in this population.

As expected, we found a greater frequency of complications of extreme prematurity associated with critical illness including hemodynamic instability among those with higher VISmax scores. SIVH, SIP, and NEC are often associated with hemodynamic dysfunction13, 14, 15. Although the presence or absence of hypotension is included in the staging of NEC16, and a requirement for vasoactive-inotropic support is a criterion for septic shock17, 18, 19, neither the extent nor the severity of hemodynamic support required in most neonatal conditions are routinely reported. Notably, over half (52%) of the extremely premature ELBW infants that received vasoactive-inotropic medications experienced VISmax within one calendar day of birth, suggesting that the indication for vasoactive-inotropic therapy was temporally associated with the complex interplay of antenatal factors, transitional events, and post-natal stressors immediately following delivery20, 21. Based on our results, patients with significant differences in mortality risk may be grouped together based on gestational age, birth weight, or a diagnosis that lacks severity classifiers. Use of the VISmax would facilitate severity of hemodynamic dysfunction classification among babies that require vasoactive-inotropic medications.

We found dopamine was nearly universally the first medication started, and dopamine was included in 99% (239/241) of treatment patterns we studied. Medication selection for initial vasoactive-inotropic therapy in this cohort was similar to previous studies in very low birth weight infants (<1500 grams)20, 22, 23, 24, 25. Given the varied initiation and combination of vasoactive-inotropic medications administered coupled with an inability to determine the indication for vasoactive-inotropic support, no particular medication combination or pattern was a reliable indicator of adverse outcomes and mortality. There is significant opportunity for improvement in neonatal clinical care and research that would accompany a determination of active disease state, phase of physiologic transition, and competing interventions prior to and after initiating vasoactive-inotropic therapy via added use of targeted neonatal point-of-care echocardiograms, increased use of biological markers of perfusion (i.e. lactates), and other noninvasive modalities such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)26, 27, 28, 29, 30.

Our objective was to determine the relationship between VISmax and mortality in extremely premature (<29 weeks completed gestation), extremely low birth weight (<1000 grams) infants. Our results highlight the strong association of the VISmax score and mortality risk and underscore the inclusion of the VISmax as an opportunity to use an underutilized metric in a fragile population lacking objective, quantifiable, replicable tools. In stark contrast to data-rich care guidelines available for pediatric and adult ICU patients to address multiple etiologies of hypotension, the definition of hypotension, including evidence-based thresholds for when to intervene, the characterization and dynamics of hypotension including cardiac function as well as the effects of specific medications and dosing, and therapeutic endpoints of when to stop treatment, remain unclear in the extremely preterm infant31, 32. Many reasons may be given for this lack of consensus including the impact and overlap of a variety of antenatal factors, transitional events, and post-natal disease states20, 33. The lack of verified clinical definitions and predictors of outcomes complicates neonatal care. The conduct of clinical trials to determine if benefit or harm occurs with a specific intervention or therapy is hampered by the variability in practices across centers and insufficient detail in publications including the extent of support. The VISmax could allow for risk stratification of patients, assist with study design, help to more clearly describe populations being investigated, and serve as an important control variable when analyzing the impact of therapies intended to stabilize the cardiovascular system in unique patient populations. Due to the potential variability in hemodynamic support practices between centers based on the lack of evidence-based approaches for hypotension, use of the VISmax in future clinical studies represents a substantial advance in this population in that it may be used independently or in concert with severity of illness scores, such as the neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA)34, to help identify and quantify the extent of hemodynamic/cardiovascular dysfunction.

Our study is not without limitations inherent to any retrospective single-center study. Our objective was to determine the relationship between the VISmax and mortality in this unique population. We did not perform a matched propensity analysis aimed to determine the impact of vasoactive-inotropic drugs on mortality. These data neither support modification of an individual patient’s treatment to avoid a high VISmax, nor that vasoactive-inotropic medications cause adverse outcomes. We chose to focus on inborn, extremely premature ELBW infants due to the variability in neonatal outcomes based on hospital of birth, adverse outcomes related to neonatal transport, and inability to accurately quantify vasoactive-inotropic medication administration at outside hospitals and during transport35, 36, 37, 38. Future studies that include out-born infants may produce different results that are influenced by the greater likelihood of complications associated with transport of this fragile patient population. We were unable to identify the specific etiology or specific criteria in this cohort that prompted intervention with vasoactive-inotropic medications by the clinical provider. The rationale for vasoactive-inotropic medication including need, selection, and dosing is an area of much debate in neonatology. There is neither a consensus definition of hypotension in this population, nor guidelines on which medications and doses should be used, thus the prescriptive practice for vasoactive-inotropic medications may be unique between centers. Prospective, multi-center studies are planned to determine the generalizability of our results. We did not collect data on the use of volume expansion, which is routinely contraindicated in the ELBW population given the risk of IVH unless there is a clear volume loss mechanism. Between the groups that received vasoactive-inotropic medications, we did not see a difference in the 5 minute Apgar score, which may reflect the need for and response to resuscitation following potentially impactful variables at the time of delivery (i.e. prenatal care, cord accident, placental abruption). Vasoactive-inotropic drugs were the first-line interventions at the institution in this population over the study period for hypotension (defined as less than the gestational age at birth), consistent with many academic center’s approaches39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45. Despite these limitations, this is the largest descriptive study of VISmax in extremely premature, ELBW infants in the absence of consensus guidelines for management of hypotension in this population.

Conclusions

VISmax is a quantifiable, objective marker of hemodynamic/cardiovascular support that was directly associated with mortality in extremely premature ELBW infants. VISmax > 30 was associated with universal mortality in this population. The VISmax, alone or in conjunction with other acuity of illness scores, such as the nSOFA, represents an important step towards neonatal precision medicine that may aid clinicians in risk stratifying extremely premature ELBW infants.

Acknowledgments

Funding Source:

None. This work was not directly supported. JLW receives support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; R01GM128452; R01HD089939, R01HD097081, R43EB029863).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University Of Florida (IRB201902780). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  • 1.Watkins PL, Dagle JM, Bell EF, Colaizy TT. Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months of Corrected Age for Infants Born at 22 to 25 Weeks of Gestation in a Center Practicing Active Management. J Pediatr 2020, 217: 52–58 e51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, et al. Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 2015, 314(10): 1039–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patel RM, Kandefer S, Walsh MC, Bell EF, Carlo WA, Laptook AR, et al. Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011. N Engl J Med 2015, 372(4): 331–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butts RJ, Scheurer MA, Atz AM, Zyblewski SC, Hulsey TC, Bradley SM, et al. Comparison of maximum vasoactive inotropic score and low cardiac output syndrome as markers of early postoperative outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery. Pediatr Cardiol 2012, 33(4): 633–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wernovsky G, Wypij D, Jonas RA, Mayer JE Jr., Hanley FL, Hickey PR, et al. Postoperative course and hemodynamic profile after the arterial switch operation in neonates and infants. A comparison of low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Circulation 1995, 92(8): 2226–2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH, Napoli ML, Gajarski RJ, Ohye RG, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010, 11(2): 234–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gaies MG, Jeffries HE, Niebler RA, Pasquali SK, Donohue JE, Yu S, et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score is associated with outcome after infant cardiac surgery: an analysis from the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium and Virtual PICU System Registries. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014, 15(6): 529–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McIntosh AM, Tong S, Deakyne SJ, Davidson JA, Scott HF. Validation of the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score in Pediatric Sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017, 18(8): 750–757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davidson J, Tong S, Hancock H, Hauck A, da Cruz E, Kaufman J. Prospective validation of the vasoactive-inotropic score and correlation to short-term outcomes in neonates and infants after cardiothoracic surgery. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38(7): 1184–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brand DA, Patrick PA, Berger JT, Ibrahim M, Matela A, Upadhyay S, et al. Intensity of Vasopressor Therapy for Septic Shock and the Risk of In-Hospital Death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017, 53(5): 938–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giesinger RE, McNamara PJ. Hemodynamic instability in the critically ill neonate: An approach to cardiovascular support based on disease pathophysiology. Semin Perinatol 2016, 40(3): 174–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haque A, Siddiqui NR, Munir O, Saleem S, Mian A. Association between vasoactive-inotropic score and mortality in pediatric septic shock. Indian Pediatr 2015, 52(4): 311–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dempsey EM, Barrington KJ. Evaluation and treatment of hypotension in the preterm infant. Clin Perinatol 2009, 36(1): 75–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Uauy RD, Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Phillips EA, Phillips JB, Wright LL. Necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants: biodemographic and clinical correlates. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1991, 119(4): 630–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adderson EE, Pappin A, Pavia AT. Spontaneous intestinal perforation in premature infants: a distinct clinical entity associated with systemic candidiasis. J Pediatr Surg 1998, 33(10): 1463–1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am 1986, 33(1): 179–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A, International Consensus Conference on Pediatric S. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005, 6(1): 2–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315(8): 801–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Laborie S, Rabilloud M, Lapillonne A, Claris O. Outcome and prognostic factors in neonates with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008, 9(2): 186–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El-Khuffash A, McNamara PJ. Hemodynamic Assessment and Monitoring of Premature Infants. Clin Perinatol 2017, 44(2): 377–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vento M, Lista G. Managing preterm infants in the first minutes of life. Paediatr Respir Rev 2015, 16(3): 151–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seri I. Management of hypotension and low systemic blood flow in the very low birth weight neonate during the first postnatal week. J Perinatol 2006, 26Suppl 1: S8–13; discussion S22-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pellicer A, Valverde E, Elorza MD, Madero R, Gaya F, Quero J, et al. Cardiovascular support for low birth weight infants and cerebral hemodynamics: a randomized, blinded, clinical trial. Pediatrics 2005, 115(6): 1501–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Seri I. Circulatory support of the sick preterm infant. Semin Neonatol 2001, 6(1): 85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kuint J, Barak M, Morag I, Maayan-Metzger A. Early treated hypotension and outcome in very low birth weight infants. Neonatology 2009, 95(4): 311–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dilli D, Soylu H, Tekin N. Neonatal hemodynamics and management of hypotension in newborns. Turk Pediatri Ars 2018, 53(Suppl 1): S65–S75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.El-Khuffash AF, McNamara PJ. Neonatologist-performed functional echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011, 16(1): 50–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weisz DE, Poon WB, James A, McNamara PJ. Low cardiac output secondary to a malpositioned umbilical venous catheter: value of targeted neonatal echocardiography. AJP Rep 2014, 4(1): 23–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murkin JM, Arango M. Near-infrared spectroscopy as an index of brain and tissue oxygenation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103Suppl 1: i3–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Noori S, Drabu B, Soleymani S, Seri I. Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012, 97(5): F340–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Philadelphia Neonatal Blood Pressure Study Group. J Perinatol 1995, 15(6): 470–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Batton B, Li L, Newman NS, Das A, Watterberg KL, Yoder BA, et al. Evolving blood pressure dynamics for extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 2014, 34(4): 301–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Noori S, Seri I. Neonatal blood pressure support: the use of inotropes, lusitropes, and other vasopressor agents. Clin Perinatol 2012, 39(1): 221–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wynn JL, Polin RA. A neonatal sequential organ failure assessment score predicts mortality to late-onset sepsis in preterm very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 2020, 88(1): 85–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lorch SA, Baiocchi M, Ahlberg CE, Small DS. The differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants. Pediatrics 2012, 130(2): 270–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, Pendray M, Synnes A, Whyte R, et al. Variations in practice and outcomes in the Canadian NICU network: 1996-1997. Pediatrics 2000, 106(5): 1070–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McNamara PJ, Mak W, Whyte HE. Dedicated neonatal retrieval teams improve delivery room resuscitation of outborn premature infants. J Perinatol 2005, 25(5): 309–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010, 126(3): 443–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(2): CD002055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dempsey EM, Barrington KJ, Marlow N, O'Donnell CP, Miletin J, Naulaers G, et al. Management of hypotension in preterm infants (The HIP Trial): a randomised controlled trial of hypotension management in extremely low gestational age newborns. Neonatology 2014, 105(4): 275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dempsey EM, Barrington KJ. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic interventions for the hypotensive very low birth weight infant. J Perinatol 2006, 26(11): 677–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laughon M, Bose C, Allred E, O'Shea TM, Van Marter LJ, Bednarek F, et al. Factors associated with treatment for hypotension in extremely low gestational age newborns during the first postnatal week. Pediatrics 2007, 119(2): 273–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dempsey EM, Barrington KJ. Treating hypotension in the preterm infant: when and with what: a critical and systematic review. J Perinatol 2007, 27(8): 469–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.St Peter D, Gandy C, Hoffman SB. Hypotension and Adverse Outcomes in Prematurity: Comparing Definitions. Neonatology 2017, 111(3): 228–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gogcu S, Washburn L, O'Shea TM. Treatment for hypotension in the first 24 postnatal hours and the risk of hearing loss among extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2020, 40(5): 774–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES