Skip to main content
Natural Products and Bioprospecting logoLink to Natural Products and Bioprospecting
. 2021 Sep 13;11(6):611–628. doi: 10.1007/s13659-021-00317-w

Natural Products as Potential Lead Compounds for Drug Discovery Against SARS-CoV-2

Oyere Tanyi Ebob 1, Smith B Babiaka 1, Fidele Ntie-Kang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8435765  PMID: 34515981

Abstract

For the past 2 years, the coronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 infection has become a world pandemic, ruining the lives and economies of several nations in the world. This has scaled up research on the virus and the resulting infection with the goal of developing new vaccines and therapies. Natural products are known to be a rich source of lead compounds for drug discovery, including against infectious diseases caused by microbes (viruses, bacteria and fungi). In this review article, we conducted a literature survey aimed at identifying natural products with inhibitory concentrations against the coronaviruses or their target proteins, which lie below 10 µM. This led to the identification of 42 compounds belonging to the alkaloid, flavonoid, terpenoid, phenolic, xanthone and saponin classes. The cut off concentration of 10 µM was to limit the study to the most potent chemical entities, which could be developed into therapies against the viral infection to make a contribution towards limiting the spread of the disease.

Keywords: Antivirals, Drug discovery, Inhibitors, Lead compounds, Natural products, SARS-CoV-2

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a sudden change in the lifestyle of humans all over the whole world [14]. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the disease resulting from the virus to be a pandemic, which has prompted an exponential increase in scientific research towards finding a drug or a vaccine to limit its spread and the number of casualties. At the time of writing this manuscript, the entire world had experienced about 150 million new infections, about 120 million recoveries and almost 3 million deaths [5]. Two earlier coronaviruses were associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). The symptoms associated with COVID-19 include (as in the earlier respiratory syndromes; SARS and MERS) fever, cough, dizziness, and shortness of breath, which might lead to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress, causing death [6, 7]. The virus associated with SARS, MERS and COVID-19 are air-borne and transmissible by contact with infected persons. However, COVID-19 has surpassed the earlier two syndromes in terms of the number of individuals infected and the number of deaths [6].

Coronaviruses (CoVs) belong to the family Coronaviridae, sub-family Coronaviridae and order Nidovirales. Viruses belonging to this family and sub-family are known to be large in terms of genome size (26−32 kb) [8], are enveloped, have a single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) and can infect both animals and humans. CoVs can be subdivided into four genera, i.e., alpha (α), beta (β), gamma (γ) and delta (δ) coronaviruses, according to their genotype and serology [9]. Presently all CoVs that can cause infection in humans belong to the first two categories, i.e., the alpha-coronaviruses (α-CoVs) and the beta-coronaviruses (β-CoVs). Examples of α-CoVs include the human coronavirus Netherland63 (HCoV-NL63) and human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E), named after a student specimen coded 229E, while examples of β-CoVs include the human coronavirus Organ Culture43 (HCoV-OC43), the human coronavirus Hong Kong University 1 (HCoV-HKU1), SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [9].

Even though research on the structure and mode of action of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is ongoing, several known antiviral drugs (e.g. lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/umifenovir, oseltamivir, favipiravir, remdesivir, etc.) have been used to manage cases of SARS-CoV infection, together with some anti-malarials like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin, etc. [1012]. Besides, many local communities have made claims that some medicinal plants have been successfully used to treat patients who showed some signs of COVID-19 infection [13, 14]. A recent review revealed that 92% of 135 hospitalized patients in northeast Chongqing, China have used traditional medicine in combination with conventional medicine as treatment for COVID-19 [15]. This is because medicinal plants contain natural products (NPs) which hold a huge potential to be used as lead compounds for the development of new drugs [16]. This could include drug leads for treating diseases caused by CoV activity, with the goal of developing them into novel COVID-19 drugs.

Several excellent reviews have recently been published on NPs with the potential for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection [1719]. Other reviews have focused on antiviral agents with potential for the drug development for the treatment of COVID-19 using crude extracts from plants [20, 21]. However, the focus of such reviews was on the activities of the crude extracts with little emphasis on the isolated bioactive compounds. In some other cases, only in silico hits, i.e. compounds that have been predicted computationally (via molecular docking, molecular dynamics, pharmacophore searches, etc.) have been described [19]. The current study is intended to provide an update of the isolated NPs with the potential to be developed into drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, i.e. compounds showing activities at less than 10 µM against the coronaviruses and/or their target proteins in experimental assays that has been recently published in literature. In some cases, the drug target to which the compounds bind, have been presented in the discussion. The presentation of the compounds is according to the major compound classes, which have been arranged alphabetically.

Methods

All pertinent information about the botanical description, conventional uses, phytochemicals and the pharmacological activities of the isolated compounds were collected from available recently published literature. The electronic databases employed for the assortment of relevant information include Scopus, NISCAIR, Scifinder, PubMed, Springer Link, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and an exhaustive library search. The chemical structures of the compounds were drawn using ChemDraw Ultra 8.0 software. PubChem and ChemSpider databases have been used to check the IUPAC names of the isolated phytoconstituents. The workflow for collecting the literature and writing the report has been provided in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Workflow implemented in this project

Alkaloids

Alkaloids are nitrogen-containing compounds, mostly known to be bitter principles with diverse biological activities. A summary of alkaloids with potential for drug development against SARS-CoV-2 has been provided in Table 1. Berberine (1), Fig. 2, is an isoquinoline alkaloid, known to be biosynthesized by many plant species, particularly those of the genus Berberis from which the compound derives its name. Some medicinal properties of 1 reported include anti-inflammatory [40], antiviral [41], antidiabetic [42], antihypertensive [43], hepatoprotective [44] and anticancer [45], additionally is a widely used dietary supplement due to these medicinal properties. According to Warowicka et al. compound 1 could be a possible lead compound against SARS-COV-2, which might act by modulating the nuclear factor kappa of activated B cells (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [46]. NF-κB is a protein required for DNA transcription and many other cell processes including inflammatory and immune responses. The modulation of NF-κB path is one of the ways by which the alkaloid biberine could inhibit virus infections, in addition to its anti-inflammatory properties [47]. Compound 1 has an inhibitory effect on the NF-κB signaling pathway and therefore might function as an antiviral agent against coronavirus infection. Moreover, during viral infection, the virus regulates expression of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [48, 49]. Moreover compound 1 is also known to inhibit herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection both the HSV-1 and HSV-2 virus with EC50 values of 6.77 ± 1.13 μM and 5.04 ± 1.07 μM, respectively in a dose dependent manner [50].

Table 1.

Alkaloids

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
Berberine (1) Coptidis sp. IC50 = 2.0 ± 0.5 μM MHV-A59 [22]
Cepharanthine (2) Stephania cepharantha IC50 = 0.83 ± 0.07 μM HCoV-OC43 [23]
Fangchinoline (3) Stephania tetrandra IC50 = 1.01 ± 0.07 μM HCoV-OC43 Inhibit viral replication and expression of viral S and N protein [23]
Indigodole B (4) Strobilanthes cusia IC50 = 2.09 μM HCoV-NL63 [24]
Jubanine H (5) Zizyphus jujuba EC50 = 4.49 ± 0.67 μM PEDV [17]
Nummularine B (6) Zizyphus jujuba EC50 = 6.17 ± 0.50 μM PEDV, CoV [17]
Tetrandrine (7) Stephania tetrandra IC50 = 0.33 ± 0.33 μM HCoV-OC43 [23]
Tryptanthrin (8) Strobilanthes cusia IC50 = 0.06 μM HCoV-NL63 Blocking viral RNA genome synthesis and papain-like protease 2 activity [24]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Chemical structures of promising alkaloids (1 to 8) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Cepharanthine (2), fangchinoline (3) and tetrandrine (7) are bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. Stephania tetrandra and other species of the genus Menispermaceae are major sources of bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids which are widely distributed in China and many East Asian countries [51]. A recent review showed the use of S. tetrandra in traditional Chinese medicine as antitumour, neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial [52]. Compound 7 exhibits a wide range of pharmacological activities which include anticancer, anti-inflammatory [51] it is also reported to have inhibitory activity against Ebola virus; herein, tetrandrine acts as a closure of key calcium sensor called two pore channels which remain open during viral infection through endosomal or membrane bound route. [53]. Compound 2 has antiviral activities against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) virus [54] and HSV-1 virus [55], while compound 3 replication of HIV-1[56]. A time addition assay with MRC-5 cells infected with HCoV-OC43 was used to investigate the antiviral activity of compounds 2, 3 and 7, the compounds strongly inhibited HCoV-OC43 virus with IC50 values of 0.83, 1.01 and 0.33 μM, respectively. Additionally these compounds have no cytotoxicity effect on MRC-5 cell at concentrations up to 10 μM [22].

Indigodole B (4) and tryptanthrin (8) have been isolated from methanol extract of the medicinal herb Strobilanthes cusia [57, 58], which is commonly found in northeast India, Bangladesh, southern China, Myanmar, and Taiwan [59]. The roots and leaf extracts of the plant have been used in traditional herbal medicine based on its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities [60, 61]. According to Tsai et al. the methanol extract of S. cusia reduced HCoV-NL6 viral production with an IC50 value of 0.12 μg/mL [24]. Compounds 8 and 4 had high activity against HCoV-NL63, with compound 8 being reported to be the most potent compound, reducing HCoV-NL63 viral production with IC50 = 0.06 μM. Meanwhile, compound 4 exhibited an effective virucidal activity against HCoV-NL63 with an IC50 of 2.09 μM [24]. Compound 8 specifically altered the antigenic structure of the viral spike protein and further inhibits the cleavage activity of the proteolipid protein 2 (PLP2) gene, associated with virucidal activity, and inhibits the post-entry stage of HCoV‐NL63 replication [24].

Cyclopeptide alkaloids are among the common compounds in plants belonging to the Rhamnaceae, especially Ziziphus genus, e.g., Z. jujuba [62]. The cyclopeptide alkaloids jubanine H (5) and nummularine B (6) have been isolated from the stem bark of this species [62, 63]. Compound 6 is also known for its moderate in vitro antimalarial activity (against Plasmodium falciparum), with an IC50 of 10.3 μM [64]. Compounds 5 and 6 have been tested against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) in Vero cells, with their EC50 values established as 4.49 and 6.17 μM, respectively [17].

Diarylheptanoids

Diarylheptanoids, also known as diphenylheptanoids, are plant secondary metabolites derived from many plant species. They are made up of phenolic aromatic rings fused together by linear seven carbon chains. They can be either open chain or macrocyclic diarylheptanoids [65]. Diarylheptanoids possess numerous therapeutic benefits including anti-inflammatory [66], antioxidant [67], anti-microbial [68] and anti-diabetic [69] activities. A summary of this class of compounds with potential for drug discovery against SARS-CoV-2 is provided in Table 2, while the chemical structures of the compounds are shown in Fig. 3.

Table 2.

Diarylheptanoids

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
Hirsutenone (9) Alnus japonica IC50 = 4.1 ± 0.3 μM SARS-CoV3 PLpro [25]
Hirsutanonol (10) Alnus japonica IC50 = 7.8 ± 1.7 μM SARS-CoV3 PLpro [25]
Rubranoside B (11) Alnus japonica IC50 = 8.0 ± 0.2 μM SARS-CoV3 PLpro [25]
Rubranoside A (12) Alnus japonica IC50 = 9.1 ± 1.0 μM SARS-CoV3 PLpro [25]
Curcumin (13) Curcuma longa IC50 = 5.7 μM SARS-CoV3 PLpro [25]

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Chemical structures of promising diarylheptanoids (9 to 13) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

In a study to discover new compounds that inhibit SARS-CoV, Park et al. found the ethanol extract of the stem back of Alnus japonica to exhibit PLpro inhibitory [25]. A. japonica has a lot of pharmacologic properties, including anti-inflammatory [70], antioxidant [71] and anti-influenza activities [72]. The isolated diarylheptanoids of interest include hirsutenone (9), hirsutanonol (10), rubranoside B (11) and rubranoside A (12) [25]. The isolated diarylheptanoids were tested against SARS-CoV PLpro using a continuous fluorometric assay and showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect against the PLpro [25]. The compounds were found to be reversible inhibitors because an increase in concentration rapidly reduced enzyme activity. For compounds 9 and 10, it was found that α,β-unsaturated carbonyl and catechol groups may play a pivotal role in SARS-CoV PLpro inhibition by interacting with the PLpro nucleophiles while the monohydroxy substitution led to drop in the inhibitory effect [73]. When the compounds were tested against SARS-CoV 3CLpro, the findings showed that the diarylheptanoids displayed a significant selectivity towards the 3CLpro proteases [25]. The IC50 values are 4.1, 7.8, 8.0 and 9.1 µM, respectively. The known viral protease inhibitor curcumin (13) was used as a reference inhibitor (with an IC50 value of 5.7 µM) [74].

Flavonoids

The potential anti-COVID flavonoids (Figs. 4, 5 and Table 3) include tomentins A (22), B (23), E (24), 4′-O-methyl diplacol (14), and diplacone (16), which are geranyl flavonoids isolated from the fruits of Paulownia tomentosa [26, 27]. P. tomentosa is widely distributed in China and parts of this plant species (the bark, fruits, xylem, and leaves) have been used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat several ailments, including tonsillitis, bronchitis, asthmatic attacks, and dysentery [75, 76]. The anti-inflammatory property of the plant has been most exploited [77]. Besides, some compounds isolated from the fruits of this species have demonstrated the ability to inhibit airway inflammation [78], while other compounds are known to exhibit cytotoxic [79], antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [80]. The antiviral properties of the fruit extract and the isolated compounds from this species have been investigated in vitro against the polyprotein target papain like protease (PLpro), a protein involved in RNA replication [26]. All the compounds from this species displayed a dose dependent inhibition of SARS-CoV PLpro, compound 22 being the most potent with an inhibitory constant, Ki = 3.5 μM [26]. The IC50 values of the compounds are listed in Table 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Chemical structures of promising flavonoids (14 to 23) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

More chemical structures of promising flavonoids (24 to 26) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Table 3.

Flavonoids

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
4′-O-methyl diplacol (14) Paulownia tomentosa IC50 = 9.2 ± 0.13 μM SARS-CoV [26]
Amentoflavone (15) Torreya nucifera IC50 = 8.3 μM [27]
Diplacone (16) Paulownia tomentosa IC50 = 10.4 ± 0.16 μM SARS-CoVPLpro [26]
Hesperetin (17) Isatis indigotica IC50 = 8.3 μM [28]
Myricetin (18) Myrica nagi IC50 = 2.71 ± 0.19 μM SARS-CoV NTPase/helicase Fits in and directly interact with ATP/ADP binding pocket of the SARS-CoV helicase protein, thereby excluding a direct binding of ATP/ADP [29]
Papyriflavonol A (19) Broussonetia papyrifera IC50 = 3.7 ± 1.6 μM SARS-CoV PLpro [30]
Quercetin (20) Taxillus chinensis IC50 = 8.6 ± 3.2 μM SARS-CoV PLpro [30]
Scutellarein (21) Scutellarialateriflora IC50 = 0.86 μM ATPase activity Fits in and directly interact with ATP/ADP binding pocket of the SARS-CoV helicase protein, thereby excluding a direct binding of ATP/ADP [29]
Tomentin A (22) Paulownia tomentosa IC50 = 6.2 ± 0.04 μM [26]
Tomentin B (23) Paulownia tomentosa IC50 = 6.1 ± 0.02 μM [26]
Tomentin E (24) Paulownia tomentosa IC50 = 5.0 ± 0.06 μM [26]
Xanthoangelol E (25) Angelica keiskei IC50 = 7.1 ± 0.8 μM PLpro, SARS-CoV 3CLpro [31]
Leachianone G (26) Morus alba IC50 = 4.49 μM HSV-1 [32]

The ethanol extract of Angelica keiskei has shown effective inhibition against 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) and PLpro (with 75% and 88% inhibition at 30 μg/mL, respectively) [31]. A. keiskei is a large perennial plant widely distributed in Japan, Korean and China. Its traditional uses include as a tonic, diuretic, laxative, and analeptic [81]. The plant extracts have exhibited several biological activities, including antitumor and antimetastatic effects [82]. The compound xanthoangelol E (20) was isolated from A. keiskei [31]. Park et al. subjected this compound to fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and cell-based cis-cleavage inhibition assay to measure the SARS-CoV 3CLpro and SARS-CoV PLpro inhibition in vitro [30]. The compound showed a dose-dependent inhibition both in the SARS-CoV PLpro and SARS-CoV 3CLpro, with IC50 values of 11.4 and 1.2 μM, respectively [30]. These results show that compound 20 has specific inhibitory activity against the cysteine protease.

The crude ethanol extract of Torreya nucifera (a plant found in a snowy area near the sea of Jeju island in Korea) was subjected to FRET assay to measure the inhibitory effectiveness against SARS-CoV 3CLpro [83]. The results showed 62% inhibition at 100 μg/mL [27]. The bioflavonoid amentoflavone (15) isolated from this species [27], has shown wide pharmacological importance in the treatment of Alzheimer [84] and in the treatment of bladder cancer [77]. Compound 15 also showed potential antiviral activity against the syncytial virus (RSV), with IC50 = 5.5 μg/mL [85]. The compound also showed inhibitory effects against the hepatitis C virus (HCC) [86], as well as revealed antiviral activity against influenza-A and influenza-B viruses, although only showing moderate activity against the herpes viruses (HSV-1 and HSV-2) [87, 88]. Moreover, a computational study revealed compound 15 has a good binding affinity against the NS2B–NS3 protease protein in docking simulation (binding affinity of − 9.0 kcal/mol) and showed significant inhibition of the Zika virus from the modelling studies [89]. Ryu et al. subjected compound 10 to a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay and showed that this compound displayed a dose-dependent inhibitory activity of SARS-CoV 3CLpro [27].

Myricetin (18) is polyhydroxy flavonoid first isolated as a yellow-coloured crystal in the late eighteenth century from the back of Myrica nagi harvested from India [90]. The compound is an important element in a variety of human foods, including vegetables, tea and many fruits. Compound 18 is known for its iron-chelating, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties [91]. Yu et al. examined the inhibitory effect of compound 18 and scutellarein (21) against SARS-CoV helicase, Nsp13, hepatitis C virus (HCV) helicase by using the FRET- bases double stranded DNA unwinding assay as well as using a colorimetry-based ATP hydrolysis assay [29]. Compound 21 was isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis (commonly known as Chinese skullcap), which is traditionally used for treating inflammation and respiration [92]. The results showed that compounds 18 and 21 potently inhibited SARS-CoV helicase protein in vitro by acting on ATPase with IC50 values of 2.71 and 0.86 μM, respectively, although the compounds did not suppress the helicase activity of the HCV virus [29]. Yu et al. modelling analysis revealed that compounds 18 and 21 could fit in and directly interact with ATP/ADP binding pocket of SARS-CoV helicase protein inhibiting the direct binding of ATP/ADP [29]. Moreover, it was observed that compounds 18 and 21 didn’t exhibit cytotoxicity against normal breast epithelial cell lines (MCF10A) [29].

Quercetin (20) is a polyphenolic flavonoid found in several vegetables and fruits such as berries, apples, and onions [93]. The compound has been found to have many pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory activity by cyclooxygenase inhibition [9496], lipoxygenase [96, 97], expression of cyclooxygenase and production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), as well as reducing production of interleukin (IL)-1α [98]. The compound also showed antioxidant activity via it's radical scavenging ability [99] and possesses anti-hypertensive activity [100, 101]. Park et al. demonstrated the antiviral activity of compound 20 against SARS-CoV PLpro with an IC50 value of 8.6 μM [30]. No cell-based assay of antiviral activity was carried [30]. Besides, compound 20 showed the capacity to block the entry of SARS-CoV into host cells and further antagonized HIV-luc/SARS pseudo typed virus entry with an EC50 of 83.4 μM [34]. Additionally, compound 20 showed cytotoxicity, with CC50 = 3.32 μM [34].

Hesperetin (17) is a flavone glycoside commonly found in citrus fruits [102]. Recent studies have shown that antioxidant activity of compound 17 is not limited to its radical scavenging effects, but also boosts antioxidant cellular activity through extracellular signal regulated kinases/nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (ERK/Nrf2) signaling pathway [28]. According to Lin et al. compound 17 showed a dose-dependent inhibited cleavage activity of SARS-CoV 3CLpro in cell-based assay [103]. In addition, the compound is less cytotoxic in Vero cells [103]. In silico studies have shown that 17 binds with high affinity to helicase, spike protein and protease side on the ACE2 receptors used by SARS-CoV-2 to cause COVID-19 (Fig. 6), suggesting that this compound could be a potential inhibitor of coronavirus cell growth [104].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

A Chemical structure of hesperetin (17); B The docked pose of the compound towards the SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 receptor binding site for the identification of its putative binding mode. This figure has been reproduced without

copyright permission from MDPI because it was originally published under an open access license [104]

Papyriflavonol A (19) is a prenylated flavonol from Broussonetia papyrifera [105]. B. papyrifera is a deciduous tree, whose extracts exhibit antifungal [106], antioxidant [107] and antihepatotoxic properties [108]. The fruits of this plant have been used to treat ophthalmic disorder in China, with its efficacy being proven by pharmacologic experiments [109]. Compound 19 showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV PLpro (IC50 = 3.7 μM), when subjected to the fluorogenic peptide Z-RLRGG-AMC assay [30]. The compound also shows a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on both α-glucosidase and cysteine proteases [30]. It is known that PLpro exhibits deubiquitinating (DUB) activity and antagonizes the induction of type-1 interferon (IFN), the interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) is the most overexpressed gene upon IFN stimulation and it’s involved in marking newly synthesised protein during an antiviral response. Both ubiquitin and ISG15 are important for viral replication and pathogenesis, SARS-CoV PLpro can cleave ubiquitin and ISG15 from cellular conjugates, additionally compound 19 strongly inhibits both ubiquitin and ISG15 with an IC50 values of 7.6 and 8.5 µM, respectively [30].

Du et al. reported the antiviral activity of leachianone G (26) against herpes simplex type 1 virus (HSV-1) [32]. Compound 26 is a prenylated flavonoid present in many plant species particularly Morus alba [32]. This species is widely distributed in India, China, Japan, and Southern Europe [110]. M. alba is also a rich source of phenolic compounds, including flavonoids and anthocyanins which are of great pharmacological and biological importance because of their antioxidant properties [111]. The plant has been used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus due to its hypoglycemic effects [112]. Moreover, M. alba is also known to possess other known antiviral activities, e.g., against rhinovirus [113], dengue virus [114] and hepatitis B virus [115]. The compound showed potent antiviral activity against HSV-1 (IC50 = 4.49 µM). Its cytotoxicity tested on Vero cells showed an IC50 value of 250 µM. The known antiviral drug (acyclovir), which was used as a positive control in this experiment, also showed potent anti-HSV-1 activity (IC50 = 3.65 µM). The antiviral activities and cytotoxic effects of compound 26 as well as for the control antiviral drug (acyclovir) were determined using the viral cytopathic effect assay [32].

Phenolics

Phenolics are known to be very important dietary components and are strong natural antioxidants [116]. They also exhibit anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer [117], antimicrobial [118] and other pharmacological properties. This class of secondary metabolites contains one or many hydroxyl groups attached directly to a benzene ring, including the flavonoid class earlier discussed [119]. In the paragraphs beneath, we focus the discussion on non-flavonoid-based and non-diarylheptanoid phenolic compounds. A summary has been provided in Table 4, with chemical structures shown in Fig. 7.

Table 4.

Phenolics

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
Pentagalloylglucose (27) Phyllanthus emblica EC50 = 4.12 ± 0.67 μM HSV-1 Inhibits HSV-1 DNA and mRNA synthesis (inhibits HSV-1 gene replication, transcription and also block nucleoside nucleocapsid egress and nuclear skeleton rearrangement) [33]
Tetra-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose (28) Galla chinensis EC50 = 4.5 μM SARS-CoV [34]

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Chemical structures of promising phenolics (27 and 28) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Pentagalloylglucose (27) is a polyphenol isolated from the branches and leaves of Phyllanthus emblica [120]. It is an indigenous tree in Southeast Asia (also known as Indian Gooseberry or Amla). The extract of P. emblica is known to possess great pharmacologic properties, such as anticancer, antitumor and antioxidant activities [121, 122]. Compound 27 has been reported to have several medicinal properties, e.g., as an anticancer agent, since the compound could elicit rapid and selective cytotoxicity in cancer cells [123]. Computational studies reveal that compound 27 could inhibit viral entry by binding to Zika virus envelope protein [124]. Additionally, this compound inhibits the early steps of hepatitis C virus [124], as well as reduces the growth of hepatitis B virus [125] and shows antiviral activities against respiratory syncytial virus [126]. According to Pei et al., the EC50 value of compound 27 was measured to be 4.12 µM, using the XTT and plaque reduction assay. Compound 27 shows strong inhibitory activity in early and late stages of HSV-1 virus, inhibiting gene replication, transcription, and related structural changes [33].

Yi et al. investigated the antiviral activity of tetra-O-galloyl-beta-d-glucose (28) using a colorimetric assay for assessing cell metabolic activity (MTT) assay against SARS-CoV [34]. Compound 28 also expresses an effective SARS-CoV inhibition with an EC50 = 4.5 μM and a cytotoxicity value of 1.08 μM using Vero E6 cell following the MTT assay. The results suggest that 28 could be used at concentration to inhibit SARS-CoV without a considerable cytotoxic effect [34].

Saponin

Saponins are naturally occurring bioorganic compounds having at least one glycosidic linkage (C-O-sugar bond) between an aglycone and a sugar chain. Hydrolysis of a saponin molecule produces two portions, aglycone and a sugar moiety. Specifically, they are naturally occurring glycosides described by the soap-like foaming, and consequently, they produce foams when shaken in aqueous solutions. They are known to exhibit biological properties such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral [127] and anti-inflammatory [127, 128].

Escin (29), Fig. 8 and Table 5, is a major principle from horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum [129]. The plant has been used in traditional medicine to treat several conditions, including hemorrhoids [130], postoperative edema [131], venomous congestion [132] and anti-inflammatory action [133]. Compound 29 was first isolated in the year 1953 [129] and its pharmacologic and biological properties include anti-inflammatory [134], anti-edematous [132] and preventing the hypoxic damage of the endothelium [135]. According to Wu et al. this compound showed a potent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-3CLpro, its measured EC50 value being 6 µM and it had a cytotoxicity value of 15 µM [35]. A cell-based assay with SARS-CoV and Vero E6 cells was used to measure this activity.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Ecsin (29), a promising saponin with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Table 5.

Saponin

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
Escin (29) Aesculus turbinata EC50 = 6 μM SARS-CoV 3Cpro [35]

Terpenoids

Terpenoids constitute a diverse class of NPs biosynthesized from the condensation of isoprene units to yield terpenes. In plants, terpenoids can serve in communication and defense, for example they act as attractants for pollinators and seed dispersers (chemoattractants or chemorepellents) [115]. Terpenoids are known to possess diverse biological properties, including anti-inflammatory [136], analgesic [137], general antimicrobial [138], and specifically antiviral activities [139]. Potential next generation lead compounds with a premise for SARS-CoV-2 have been summarized in Table 6.

Table 6.

Terpenoids

Compound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities References
Diterpenoids
Dihydrotanshinone I (30) Salvia miltiorrhiza IC50 = 4.9 ± 1.2 μM/14.4 ± 0.7 μM PLpro /CLpro Selective and slow-binding inhibitors for SARS-CoV cysteine proteases [36]
Tanshinone IIA (31) Salvia miltiorrhiza IC50 = 1.6 ± 0.5 μM/89.1 ± 5.2 μM SARS-CoV PLpro /CLpro Selective and slow-binding inhibitors for SARS-CoV cysteine proteases [36]
Methyl tanshinonate (32) Salvia miltiorrhiza IC50 = 9.2 ± 2.8 μM/21.1 ± 0.8 μM SARS-CoV PLpro /CLpro Selective and slow-binding inhibitors for SARS-CoV cysteine proteases [36]
Tanshinone I (33) Salvia miltiorrhiza IC50 = 8.8 ± 0.4 μM/38.7 ± 8.2 μM SARS-CoV PLpro /3CLpro Selective and slow-binding inhibitors for SARS-CoV cysteine proteases [36]
Cryptotanshinone (34) Salvia miltiorrhiza IC50 = 0.8 ± 0.2 μM/226.7 ± 6.2 μM SARS-CoV PLpro/CLpro

Selective and slow-binding inhibitors for SARS-CoV

cysteine proteases

[36]
Triterpenoids
3β-Hydroxy-28-norolean-12,17-dien-16-one 3-O-6′-methoxy-α-d-glucuronopyranoside (35) Camellia japonica EC50 = 0.93 ± 0.22 μM PEDV [37]
Celastrol (36) Tripterygium regeli IC50 = 10.3 ± 0.2 μM SARS-CoV 3CLpro [38]
Tingenone (37) Tripterygium regeli IC50 = 9.9 ± 0.1 μM SARS-CoV 3CLpro [38]
3β-Hydroxy-28-noroleana-12,17-Dien-16-one (38) Camellia japonica EC50 = 0.28 ± 0.11 μM PEDV [37]
3β,16α-Dihydroxy-olean-12-en-28-al 3-O-β-d-glucuronopyranoside (39) Camellia japonica EC50 = 0.34 ± 0.01 μM PEDV [37]
Pristimerin (40) Tripterygium regelii IC50 = 5.5 ± 0.7 μM SARS-CoV 3CLpro [38]
Iguesterin (41) Tripterygium regelii IC50 2.6 ± 0.3 μM SARS-CoV 3CLpro [38]

Diterpenoids

Park et al. found the ethanol extract of Salvia miltiorrhiza to possess great inhibitory activity against both SARS-CoV 3CLpro and PLpro. The ethanol extract exhibited 60% and 88% inhibition of 3CLpro and PLpro, respectively, at 30 µg/mL). The plant species S. miltiorrhiza is widely found in China, Korea, and Japan and has been greatly used to treat coronary heart disease, particularly angina pectoris and myocardial infarction [140]. S. miltiorrhiza is known to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties [39]. Tashinones (Fig. 9) isolated from S. miltiorrhiza include dihydrotanshinone I (30), tanshinone IIA (31), methyl tanshinonate (32), tanshinone I (33) and cryptotanshinone (34) [36]. All the tanshinones are good inhibitors of the cysteine protease (3CLpro and PLpro), for 3CLpro the inhibitory activity was assayed following the proteolysis of the fluorogenic substrate in the presence or absence of the test compounds, all compounds except compound 33 exhibited a dose dependent inhibitory effect on 3CLpro the activities ranged from 14.4 to 89.1 µM while PLpro inhibitory activity was assayed following continuous fluorometric, these compounds impressively show better activity against PLpro have a time dependent inhibitory profile on PLpro with compound 33 having highest activity ( IC50 value of 0.8 µM), all compounds have better activity against PLpro compared to 3CLpro [36]. A detailed kinetic mechanism study showed that compounds 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34 exhibited slow binding inhibitions with enzyme isomerisation and were shown to be non-competitive inhibitors. Moreover, compound 33 was reported to have a potent activity against cellular DUB with IC50 = 0.7 µM [36]. Recent studies have reported the use of compound 31 to treat myocardial infarction and delay of ventricular remodeling, in combination with puerarin. The compound is known to act by inhibiting the inflammation in the early stage of myocardial infarction and plays an important role in inhibiting the ventricular remodeling in the later stage of myocardial infarction. The combination of compound 31 and puerarin can improve cardiac function, improve hemodynamics, reduce myocardial cells and reduce collagen synthesis in mice after myocardial infarction [141].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Chemical structures of tashinones, a promising sub-class of diterpenoids (30 to 34) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Triterpenoids

Yang et al. isolated: 3β-hydroxy-28-norolean-12,1-dien-16-one 3-O-6′-methoxy-α-d-glucuronopyranoside (35), 3β-hydroxy-28-noroleana-12,17-dien-16-One (38), and 3β,16α-dihydroxy-olean-12-en-28-al 3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (39), which are all oleanane triterpenes (Fig. 10) from the flowers of Camellia japonica. The compounds were tested for their inhibitory effectiveness against PEDV [135]. By targeting the epithelial cells of the small intestine, the PEDV virus can cause severe mucosal atrophy and malabsorption resulting in acute and lethal diarrhea in piglets [127]. The plant species C. japonica is found abundantly in Korea, Japan, and China [128]. The ethanol extract (70%) of C. japonica has a potential inhibitory effect against PEDV replication [133]. The anti-inflammatory [33] and cytotoxic [116] properties of flowers of C. japonica have been exploited traditionally and used in treating hematemesis and internal and external bleeding injury [142]. The compounds 35, 38 and 39 had potent effects against the replication of PEDV. The known drug azauridine was used as a positive control. Additionally, the compounds gave higher selective indices (SI = 14.74, 32.72 and 6.68, respectively), with compound 38 being lower than azauridine (SI = 14.30). Moreover, compound 38 was shown to inhibit the virus replication in a time course study and it was further investigated detailly and found to inhibit PEDV RNA expression, encoding nucleocapsid, spike and membrane protein in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 µM, respectively [135]. Therefore, the anti-PEDV molecules 35, 38 and 39 could be investigated further as candidates against SARS-CoV-2.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Chemical structures of promising triterpenoids (35 to 41) with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Celastrol (36), tingenone (37) pristimerin (40) and iguesterin (41) are quinone methide triterpenoids isolated from the bark of Tripterygium regelii [143]. T. regelii is a vine found widely in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan [117]. T. regelii plant has a good cytotoxicity property against numerous cancer cell lines [118] and its efficacy has been reported in rodent models of arthritis and other inflammatory disease [119, 120]. Ryu et al. reported the SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitory properties of compounds from this plant species [143]. All compounds displayed dose-dependent inhibitory activities, with the compounds 36, 37, 40 and 41 having IC50 values of 10.3, 9.9, 5.5 and 2.6 µM, respectively. Additionally, structure–activity relationship studies revealed that the quinone-methide moiety present in these compounds is important for SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibition (Fig. 11) [38]. Molecular docking analysis of compounds from this class towards the 3CLpro protein with Protein Data Bank (PDB) code 1uk4 revealed that compound 41 could fit well into the substrate-binding pocket of SARS-CoV 3CLpro, with the hydroxyl group of C3 of compound 41 forming a hydrogen bond with the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group of Cys44 and the OH of Thr25 located in domain I of the protein drug target (Fig. 11) [38].

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Molecular docking poses of the triterpenoids iguesterin (A) and dihydrocelastrol (B), isolated from the plant T. regelii showing binding to SARS-CoV 3CLpro (PDB code: 1uk4). This figure has been reproduced with

copyright permission from Elsevier [38]

Xanthone

Xanthones are oxygen containing heterocyclic compounds commonly occurring in higher plants (especially those of the Guttiferae, Gentianaceae, Moraceae, Clusiaceae and Polygalaceae families), fungi, lichen, and bacteria [144, 145], this class of secondary metabolites have been known to contain the following biological properties antimicrobial [146, 147], anticancer [146, 147], anti-inflammatory [146, 147], antimalaria [146, 148] and antiviral [149].

Shen et al. studied the antiviral activity of Calophyllum blancoi against SARS-CoV. The genus Calophyllum is a rich source of phenolics and xanthones, possess great antibacterial [143, 150], antifungal [151], antiplatelet aggregation [150], immunomodulatory [152], anticancer [153] and anti-HIV-1 viral activities [154]. Blancoxanthone (42), Table 7 and Fig. 12, isolated from the roots C. blancoi [42] showed the greatest in vitro inhibitory activity against HCoV-229E with an EC50 value of 7.93 µM [42]. The antiviral activity of the compound was evaluated using the Cell Proliferation Kit II (XTT) [42].

Table 7.

Xanthone

Coumpound name Plant species Level of activity Predicted or known target of virus Mode of action or other activities Reference
Blancoxanthone (42) Calophyllum blancoi IC50 = 7.93 μM HCoV-229E [39]

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Blacoxanthone (42), a promising xanthone with potential against SARS-CoV-2

Discussion

Out of 42 NPs belonging to the alkaloid, flavonoid, terpenoid, phenolic, xanthone and saponin classes obtained from our literature survey. Our results showed that majority of the NPs with inhibitory concentrations against the virus or its target proteins below 10 µM were terpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and diarylheptanoids, respectively. The terpenoids (diterpenoids and triterpenoids) were the most abundant among the isolated NPs, constituting 26.19% of the isolated compounds. This was followed by alkaloids (19.05%), flavonoids (11.90%), diarylheptanoids (9.52%), phenolics (4.76%), saponin (2.38%) and xanthones (2.38%), which showed a similar trend to previous studies [1719].

Conclusion

Natural products (NPs) have provided privileged scaffolds in drug design [16]. The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a positive-strand ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [155]. The virus has infected several million people and caused thousands of deaths worldwide since December 2019 [156]. The pandemic is a significant threat to public health and the global economy [155]. To search for new bioactive compounds with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, 42 NPs with inhibitory concentrations against coronaviruses, their target proteins and other viruses, e.g., HIV. Influenza A virus, human simplex virus or their target proteins which lie below 10 µM were identified from published data in literature. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was only discovered in 2019. References that show the testing of NPs against other SARS-CoV viruses (e.g. HCoV-NL63) and their targets (e.g. SARS-CoV PLpro, 3CLpro, SARS-CoV helicase, etc.) had earlier been published. We are presenting this review to encourage the testing of these compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In writing this manuscript, we must mention that the compounds were actually tested against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Only ten of the 165 references date after 2020. It was the goal of the authors to summarize the results of compounds and plant species whose extracts have already been tested against earlier discovered coronaviruses so as to ease the task of discovery of NP antivirals that could be next generation drugs to treat infections caused by SARS-CoV-2. The results of the current study reveal that promising NPs as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 were terpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and diarylheptanoids, respectively. The mechanism of action of some of the NP hits and the plant species from which they were isolated has been included in the study. It is worth mentioning that some of the medicinal plants and the NPs have shown good safety in vitro studies. This review could serve as a starting point for further development of these NPs hits as potential leads for COVID-19. Thus, it would be interesting in future to evaluate the toxicities and binding mode of some of these NPs using in silico approaches.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Oyere Tanyi Ebob, Email: oyeretanyi@gmail.com.

Smith B. Babiaka, Email: babiaka.smith@ubuea.cm

Fidele Ntie-Kang, Email: fidele.ntie-kang@ubuea.cm.

References

  • 1.Elmer T, Mepham K, Stadtfeld C. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bahkir FA, Grandee SS. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020;68:2378–2383. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2306_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kirwan R, McCullough D, Butler T, Perez de Heredia F, Davies IG, Stewart C. Geroscience. 2020;42:1547–1578. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00272-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akkoç MF, Bülbüloğlu S, Özdemir M. Int. Wound J. 2021;18:367–374. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, situation reports? (2021). https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports. Accessed 12 May 2021
  • 6.Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu WJ, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes EC, Gao GF, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. Lancet. 2020;395:565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, Ding X, Wang X, Niu P, Meng J, Zhu Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Sheng J, Quan L, Xia Z, Tan W, Cheng G, Jiang T. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:325–328. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu G, Wang Q, Gao GF. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:468–478. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Devaux CA, Rolain J-M, Colson P, Raoult D. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu H. Biosci. Trends. 2020;14:69–71. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I, Tucker C, Oechsle O, Smith D, Richardson P. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:400–402. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30132-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mani JS, Johnson JB, Steel JC, Broszczak DA, Neilsen PM, Walsh KB, Naiker M. Virus Res. 2020;284:197989. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.197989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang Y, Islam S, Wan J, Li Y, Chen X. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16:1708–1717. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wan S, Xiang Y, Fang W, Zheng Y, Li B, Hu Y, Lang C, Huang D, Sun Q, Xiong Y, Huang X, Lv J, Luo Y, Shen L, Yang H, Huang G, Yang R. J. Med. Virol. 2020;95:9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J. Nat. Prod. 2020;83:770–803. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Orhan IE, Deniz FSS. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2020;10:171–186. doi: 10.1007/s13659-020-00250-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Narkhede RR, Pise AV, Cheke RS, Shinde SD. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2020;10:297–306. doi: 10.1007/s13659-020-00253-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Attah AF, Fagbemi AA, Olubiyi O, Dada-Adegbola H, Oluwadotun A, Elujoba A, Babalola CP. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:596855. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.596855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmad S, Zahiruddin S, Parveen B, Basist P, Parveen A, Parveen R, Ahmad M. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:578970. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.578970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adhikari B, Marasini BP, Rayamajhee B, Bhattarai BR, Lamichhane G, Khadayat K, Adhikari A, Khanal S, Parajuli N. Phytother. Res. 2021;35:1298–1312. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim HY, Shin HS, Park H, Kim YC, Yun YG, Park S, Shin HJ, Kim K. J. Clin. Virol. 2008;41:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim DE, Min JS, Jang MS, Lee JY, Shin YS, Song JH, Kim HR, Kim S, Jin YH, Kwon S. Biomolecules. 2019;9:6920086. doi: 10.3390/biom9110696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai YC, Lee CL, Yen HR, Chang YS, Lin YP, Huang SH, Lin CW. Biomolecules. 2020;10:8947. doi: 10.3390/biom10030366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Park JY, Jeong HJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, Park SJ, Kim D, Park KH, Lee WS, Ryu YB. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012;35:2036–2042. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cho JK, Ryu BY, Curtis-Long MJ, Ryu HW, Yuk HJ, Kim DW, Kim HJ, Lee WS, Park KH. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012;20:2595. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ryu HW, Park YJ, Lee SU, Lee S, Yuk HJ, Seo KH, Kim YU, Hwang BY, Oh SY. J. Nat. Prod. 2017;80:2659–2665. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Parhiz H, Roohbakhsh A, Soltani F, Rezaee R, Iranshahi M. Phytother. Res. 2014;29:323–331. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu MS, Lee J, Lee JM, Kim Y, Chin YW, Jee JG, Keum YS, Jeong YJ. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:4049–4054. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.04.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park JY, Yuk HJ, Ryu HW, Lim SH, Kim KS, Park KH, Ryu YB, Lee WS. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017;32:504–512. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2016.1265519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Park JY, Ko JA, Kim DW, Kim YM, Kwon HJ, Jeong HJ, Kim CY, Park KH, Lee WS, Ryu YB. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016;31:23–30. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2014.1003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Du J, He ZD, Jiang RW, Ye WC, Xu HX, But PPH. Phytochemistry. 2003;62:1235–1238. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00753-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pei Y, Xiang YF, Chen JN, Luc CH, Hao J, Du Q, Chi-C Lai CQu, Li S, Ju HQ, Ren Z, Liu QY, Xiong S, Qian CW, Zeng FL, Zhang PZ, Yang CR, Zhang YJ, Xu J, Kitazato K, Wang YF. Antivir. Res. 2011;89:98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yi L, Li Z, Yuan K, Qu X, Chen J, Wang G, Zhang H, Luo H, Zhu L, Jiang P, Chen L, Shen Y, Luo M, Zuo G, Hu J, Duan D, Nie Y, Shi X, Wang W, Han Y, Li T, Liu Y, Ding M, Deng H, Xu X. J. Virol. 2004;78:11334–11339. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11334-11339.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu CY, Jan JT, Ma SH, Kuo CJ, Juan HF, Cheng YS, Hsu HH, Huang HC, Wu D, Brik A, Liang FS, Liu RS, Fang JM, Chen ST, Liang PH, Wong CH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10012–10017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403596101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Park JY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Jeong HJ, Kim DW, Park KH, Kwon HJ, Park SJ, Lee WS, Ryu YB. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012;20:5928–5935. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.07.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang JL, Ha TKQ, Dhodary B, Pyo E, Nguyen NH, Cho H, Kim E, Oh WK. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:1268–1280. doi: 10.1021/jm501567f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ryu YB, Park SJ, Kim YM, Lee JY, Seo WD, Chang JS, Park KH, Rho MC, Lee WS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:1873–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang BQJ. Med. Plant. Res. 2010;4:2813. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Najaran H, Bafrani HH, Rashtbari HH, Izadpanah F, Rajabi MR, Kashani HH, Mohammadi A. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2019;19:157–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Peng L, Kang S, Yin Z, Jla R, Song X, Li Z, Zou Y, Liang X, Li L, He C, Ye G, Yin L, Shi F, Ch L, Jing B. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:5217–5223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shen YC, Wang LT, Khalil AT, Chiang LC, Cheng PW. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005;53:244–247. doi: 10.1248/cpb.53.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang JT, Peng JG, Zhang JQ, Wang ZX, Zhang Y, Zhou XR, Miao J, Tang L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019;29:126709. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ma Y, Liang L, Zhang YB, Wag BF, Bai YG, Xie MJ, Wang ZW. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2017;59:191–204. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dimitrovic R, Jakovac H, Blagojevic G. Toxicology. 2011;280:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Song S, Quin M, Chu Y, Chen D, Su A, Wu Z. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:5068–5078. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02427-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zou K, Li Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Li B, Zhu W, Shi J, Jia Q, Li Y. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017;38:157–166. doi: 10.1038/aps.2016.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu W, Zhang X, Lin P, Shen X, Lan T, Li W, Ijang Q, Xie X, Huang H. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;638:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Suryavanshi S, Kulkarni YA. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8:798. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Warowicka A, Nawrot R, Goździcka-Józefiak A. Arch. Virol. 2020;165:1935–1945. doi: 10.1007/s00705-020-04706-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bhagya N, Chandrashekar KR. Phytochemistry. 2016;125:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Y, Qi D, Gao Y, Liang C, Zhang Y, Ma Z, Liu Y, Peng H, Zhang Y, Qin H, Song X, Sun X, Li Y, Liu Z. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020;260:112995. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sakurai Y, Kolokoltsov AA, Chen CC, Tidwell MW, Bauta WE, Klugbauer N, Grimm C, Schott CW, Biel M, Davey RA. Science. 2015;347:995–998. doi: 10.1126/science.1258758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baba M, Okamoto M, Kashiwaba N, Ono M. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2001;12:307–312. doi: 10.1177/095632020101200506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu X, Wang Y, Zhang M, Li G, Cen Y. Zhong Yao Cai. 2004;2004(27):107–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wan Z, Lu Y, Liao Q, Wu Y, Chen X. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee CL, Wang CM, Hu HC, Yen HR, Song YC, Yu SJ, Chen CJ, Li WC, Wu YC. Phytochemistry. 2019;162:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liau BC, Jong TT, Lee MR, Chen SS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2007;43:346–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lin W, Huang W, Ning S, Wang X, Ye Q, Wei D. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:0199788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen H, Shao J, Zhang H, Jiang M, Huang L, Zhang Z, Yang D, He M, Ronaghi M, Luo X, Sun B, Wu W, Liu C. Front. Plant. Sci. 2018;9:324. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gu W, Zhang Y, Hao XJ, Yang FM, Sun QY, Morris-Natschke SL, Lee KH, Wang YH, Long CL. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77:2590–2604. doi: 10.1021/np5003274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tripathi M, Pandey MB, Jha RN, Pandey VB, Tripathi PN, Singh JP. Fitoterapia. 2001;75:507–510. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(01)00278-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tschesche R, Khokhar I, Wilhelm H, Eckhardt G. Phytochemistry. 1976;15:541–542. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Panseeta P, Lomchoey K, Prabpai S, Kongsaeree P, Suksamrarn A, Ruchirawat S, Suksamrarn S. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:909–915. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Keserü GM, Nógrádi M. Nat. Prod. Chem. 1995;17:357–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Akihisa T, Taguchi Y, Yasukawa K, Tokuda H, Akazawa H, Suzuki T, Kimura Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006;54:735–739. doi: 10.1248/cpb.54.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nagano T, Oyama Y, Kajita N, Chikahisa L, Nakata M, Okazaki E, Masuda T. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1997;75:363–370. doi: 10.1254/jjp.75.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lee HB, Lee HK, Kim JR, Ahn YJ. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2009;52:367–370. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hu W, Wang MH. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2011;16:120–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lai YC, Chai CK, Lin WW, Lee SS. Phytochemistry. 2012;73:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lee WS, Kim JR, Im KR, Cho KH, Sok DE, Jeong TS. Planta Med. 2005;71:295–299. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-864093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tung NH, Kwon HJ, Kim JH, Ra JC, Ding Y, Kim JA, Kim YH. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:1000–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.12.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Adhikari N, Baidya S, Saha A, Jha T. Structural insight into the viral 3C-like protease inhibitors: comparative SAR/QSAR approaches. In: Gupta S, editor. Viral proteases and their inhibitors. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2017. pp. 317–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rattis BAC, Ramos SG, Celes MRN. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:675287. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.675287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.He T, Vaidya BN, Perry ZD, Parajuli P, Joshee N. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2016;14:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Navratilova A, Schneiderova K, Vesela D, Hanakova Z, Fontana A, Dall’Acqua S, Cvacka J, Innocenti G, Novotna J, Urbanova M, Pelletier J, Cízek A, Zemlickova H, Smejkal K. Phytochemistry. 2013;89:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chiang CH, Yeh CY, Chung JG, Chiang IT, Hsu FT. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:3641–3649. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen BH, Li YC, Zhao YH, Fu MH. Med. Res. 2007;18:357–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.An HK, Kim KS, Lee JW, Park MH, Moon HI, Park SJ, Baik JS, Kim CH, Lee YC. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:114607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Asai T, Hara N, Kobayashi S, Fujimoto Y. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:1234–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kil YS, Pham ST, Seo EK, Jafari M. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2017;40:655–675. doi: 10.1007/s12272-017-0892-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kimura Y, Baba K. Int. J. Cancer. 2003;106:429–437. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ryu YB, Jeong HJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, Park JY, Kim D, Naguyen TTH, Park SJ, Chang JS, Park KH, Rho MC, Lee WS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010;18:7940–7947. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhao N, Sun C, Zheng M, Liu S, Shi R. Life Sci. 2019;239:117043. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ma SC, But PP, Ooi VE, He YH, Lee SH, Lee SF, Lin RC. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2001;24:311–312. doi: 10.1248/bpb.24.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lee WP, Lan KL, Liao SX, Huang YH, Hou MC, Lan KH. AJCM. 2018;46:835–852. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X18500441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fritz D, Venturi CR, Cargnin S, Schripsema J, Roehe PM, Montanha JA, von Poser GL. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113:517–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lin YM, Flavin MT, Schure R, Chen FC, Sidwell R, Barnard DL, Huffman J, Kern ER. Planta Med. 1999;65:120–125. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-13971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bhargava S, Patel T, Gaikwad R, Patil UK, Gayen S. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019;33:851–857. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1413574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Perkin AG, Hummel JJ. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1896;69:1287–1294. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ong KC, Khoo HE. Gen. Pharmacol. 1997;29:121–126. doi: 10.1016/s0306-3623(96)00421-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhao Q, Chen XY, Martin C. Sci. Bull. 2016;61:1391–1398. doi: 10.1007/s11434-016-1136-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Anand DAV, Arulmoli R, Parasuraman S. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016;10:84–89. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.194044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Endale M, Park SC, Kim S, Kim SH, Yang Y, Cho JY, Rhee MH. Immunobiology. 2013;218:1452–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee KM, Hwang MK, Lee DE, Lee KW, Lee HJ. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:5815–5820. doi: 10.1021/jf903698s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kim HP, Mani I, Iversen L, Ziboh VA. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids. 1998;58:17–24. doi: 10.1016/s0952-3278(98)90125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mlcek J, Jurikova T, Skrovankova S, Sochor J. Molecules. 2016;21:623. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bureau G, Longpre F, Martinoli MG. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008;86:403–410. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Krol W, Czuba Z, Scheller S, Gabrys J, Grabiec S, Shani J. Biochem. Int. 1990;21:593–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Edwards RL, Lyon T, Litwin SE, Rabovsky A, Symons JD, Jalili T. J. Nutr. 2007;137:2405–2411. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.11.2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Javadi F, Eghtesadi S, Ahmadzadeh A, Aryaeian N, Zabihiyeganeh M, Foroushani AR, Jazayeri S. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2014;5:293–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Garg A, Garg S, Zaneveld LJ, Singla AK. Phytother. Res. 2001;15:655–669. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lin CW, Tsai FJ, Tsai CH, Lai CC, Wan L, Ho TY, Hsieh CC, Chao PDL. Antivir. Res. 2005;68:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ngwa W, Kumar R, Thompson D, Lyerly W, Moore R, Reid TE, Lowe H, Toyang N. Molecules. 2020;25:25112707. doi: 10.3390/molecules25112707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Son KH, Kwon SJ, Chang HW, Kim HP, Kang SS. Fitoterapia. 2001;72:456–458. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(00)00329-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kim SY, Kim JH, Kim SK, Oh MJ, Jung MYJ. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1994;71:633–640. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kim YS, Park KH. Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 1994;25:388–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sun J, Liu S, Zhang C, Yu L, Bi J, Zhu F, Yang Q. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:32021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lee D, Bhat KP, Fong HH, Farnsworth NR, Pezzuto JM, Kinghorn AD. J. Nat. Prod. 2001;64:1286–1293. doi: 10.1021/np010288l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kumar V, Chauhan S. J. Med. Plant. Res. 2008;2:271–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Mena P, Salcedo EMS, Tassoti M, Martínez JJ, Hernández F, Rio DD. Food Res. Int. 2016;89:1116–1122. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Salcedo EMS, Amorós A, Hernández F, Martínez JJ. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2017;5:253–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Desideri N, Conti C, Mastromarino P, Mastropaolo F. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2000;11:373–381. doi: 10.1177/095632020001100604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Maryam M, Te KK, Wong FC, Chai TT, Low GKK, Gan SC, Chee HY. J. Integr. Agric. 2020;19:1085–1096. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.McGarvey DJ, Croteau R. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1015–1026. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wahle KW, Brown I, Rotondo D, Heys SD. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010;698:36–51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7347-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kumar N, Gupta S, Yadav TC, Pruthi V, Varadwaj PK, Goel N. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2019;37:2355–2369. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2018.1481457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Bhattacharya A, Sood P, Citovsky V. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010;11:705–719. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Chirinos R, Pallardel IB, Huamán A, Arbizu C, Pedreschi R, Campos D. Food Chem. 2009;113:1243–1251. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang YJ, Abe T, Tanaka T, Yang CR, Kouno I. J. Nat. Prod. 2001;64:1527–1532. doi: 10.1021/np010370g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhao T, Sun Q, Marques M, Witcher M. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015;2015:950890. doi: 10.1155/2015/950890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Li W, Zhang X, Chen R, Li Y, Miao J, Liu G, Lan Y, Chen Y, Cao Y. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019;254:112740. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Taiwo BJ, Popoola TD, van Heerden FR, Fatokun AA. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020;20:287. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03075-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sharma N, Kumar P, Giri R. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020;24:1–13. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1797538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lee SJ, Lee HK, Jung MK, Mar W. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006;29:2131–2134. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yeo SJ, Yun YJ, Lyu MA, Woo SY, Woo ER, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Park HK, Kook YH. Arch. Virol. 2002;147:229–242. doi: 10.1007/s705-002-8316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sparg SG, Light ME, van Staden J. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;94:219–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Just MJ, Recio MC, Giner RM, Cuéllar MJ, Máñez S, Bilia AR, Ríos JL. Planta Med. 1998;64:404–407. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bombardelli E, Morazzoni P, Griffini A. Fitoterapia. 1996;67:483–511. [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Chauhan R, Ruby K, Dwivedi J. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res. 2012;4:50–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sirtori CR. Pharmacol. Res. 2001;44:183–193. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Frick RW. Angiology. 2000;51:197–205. doi: 10.1177/000331970005100303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bazzoni G, Dejana E, Maschio AD. Haematologica. 1991;76:491–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Xin W, Zhang L, Sun F, Jiang N, Fan H, Wang T, Li Z, He J, Fu F. Phytomedicine. 2011;18:272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Montopoli M, Froldi G, Comelli MC, Prosdocimi M, Ca-parrotta L. Planta Med. 2007;73:285–288. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Prakash V. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017;10:68–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Guimarães AG, Quintans JS, Quintans LJ. Phytother. Res. 2013;27:1–15. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Guimarães AC, Meireles LM, Lemos MF, Guimarães MCC, Endringer DC, Fronza M, Scherer R. Molecules. 2019;24:2471. doi: 10.3390/molecules24132471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Phytother. Res. 2010;24:673–679. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zhou L, Zuo Z, Chow MSS. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2005;45:1345. doi: 10.1177/0091270005282630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Gao S, Li L, Li L, Ni J, Guo R, Mao J, Fan G. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019;137:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Nakamura S, Moriura T, Park S, Fujimoto K, Matsumoto T, Ohta T, Matsuda H, Yoshikawa H. J. Nat. Prod. 2012;75:1425–1430. doi: 10.1021/np3001078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Dharmaratne HRW, Wijesinghe WMNM, Thevanasem V. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999;66:339–342. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Masters KS, Bräse S. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:3717–3776. doi: 10.1021/cr100446h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Vieira LMM, Kijjoa A. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005;12:2413–2446. doi: 10.2174/092986705774370682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Shagufta A, Ahmad I. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;116:267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.03.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Jindarat S. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2014;97:S196–S201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Riscoe M, Kelly JX, Winter R. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005;12:2539–2549. doi: 10.2174/092986705774370709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Shirey KA, Nhu QM, Yim KC, Roberts ZJ, Teijaro JR, Farber DL, Blanco JC, Vogel SN. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011;89:351–357. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0410216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Iinuma M, Tosa H, Tanaka T, Asai F, Kobayashi Y, Shimano R, Miyauchi KI. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996;48:861–865. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1996.tb03988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Chilpa RR, Estrada MJ, Muniz EE. J. Chem. Ecol. 1997;23:1901–1911. [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Gonzalez MJ, Nascimento MSJ, Cidade HM, Pinto MMM, Kijjoa A, Anantachoke C, Silva AMS, Herz W. Planta Med. 1999;65:368–371. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ito C, Itoigawa M, Mishina Y, Filho VC, Mukainaka T, Tokuda H, Nishino H, Furukawa H. J. Nat. Prod. 2002;65:267–272. doi: 10.1021/np010398s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Dharmaratne HR, Tan GT, Marasinghe GP, Pezzuto JM. Planta Med. 2002;68:86–87. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Gordon DE, Hiatt J, Bouhaddou M, Rezelj VV, Ulferts S, Braberg H, Jureka AS, Obernier K, Guo JZ, Batra J, Kaake RM, Weckstein AR, Owens TW, Gupta M, Pourmal S, Titus EW, Cakir M, Soucheray M, McGregor M, Cakir Z, et al. Science. 2020;370:eabe9403. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Ngo ST, Pham NQA, Le LT, Pham DH, Vu VV. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020;60:5771–5780. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Geng CA, Ma YB, Zhang XM, Yao SY. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:8197–8202. doi: 10.1021/jf302639b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Li C, Li Z, Zou Y, Wicht O, van Kuppeveld FJM, Rottier PJM, Bosch BJ. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:69997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Tamaru S, Ohmachi K, Miyata Y, Tanaka T, Kubayasi T, Nagata Y, Tanaka K. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013;61:5817–5823. doi: 10.1021/jf400938h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Thao NTP, Hung TM, Lee MK, Kim JC, Min BS, Bae KH. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010;58:121–124. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ma JS, Brach AR, Liu QR. Edinb. J. Bot. 1999;56:33. [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Kim DH, Shin EK, Kim YH, Lee BW, Jun JG, Park JHY, Kim JK. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2009;39:819. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Byun JY, Kim MJ, Eum DY, Yoon CH, Seo WD, Park KH, Hyun JW, Lee YS, Lee JS, Yoon MY, Lee SJ. Mol. Pharm. 2009;76:734. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.056259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Hui B, Wu Y, Wang H, Tian X. Zhongguo Taolixue Tongbao. 2003;19:656. [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Liu D, Memg X, Wu D, Qiu Z, Luo HA. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:9. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Natural Products and Bioprospecting are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES