Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci (Camb). 2020 Dec 15;7(2):357–366. doi: 10.1039/d0ew00706d

Effects of residual disinfectants on the redox speciation of lead(ii)/(iv) minerals in drinking water distribution systems

Sumant Avasarala a, John Orta a, Michael Schaefer b, Macon Abernathy b, Samantha Ying b, Haizhou Liu a
PMCID: PMC8437151  NIHMSID: NIHMS1732945  PMID: 34522388

Abstract

This study investigated the reaction kinetics on the oxidative transformation of lead(ii) minerals by free chlorine (HOCl) and free bromine (HOBr) in drinking water distribution systems. According to chemical equilibrium predictions, lead(ii) carbonate minerals, cerussite PbCO3(s) and hydrocerussite Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2(s), and lead(ii) phosphate mineral, chloropyromorphite Pb5(PO4)3Cl(s) are formed in drinking water distribution systems in the absence and presence of phosphate, respectively. X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) data showed that at pH 7 and a 10 mM alkalinity, the majority of cerussite and hydrocerussite was oxidized to lead(iv) mineral PbO2(s) within 120 minutes of reaction with chlorine (3 : 1 Cl2 : Pb(ii) molar ratio). In contrast, very little oxidation of chloropyromorphite occurred. Under similar conditions, oxidation of lead(ii) carbonate and phosphate minerals by HOBr exhibited a reaction kinetics that was orders of magnitude faster than by HOCl. Their end oxidation products were identified as mainly plattnerite β-PbO2(s) and trace amounts of scrutinyite α-PbO2(s) based on X-ray diffraction (XRD) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopic analysis. A kinetic model was established based on the solid-phase experimental data. The model predicted that in real drinking water distribution systems, it takes 0.6–1.2 years to completely oxidize Pb(ii) minerals in the surface layer of corrosion scales to PbO2(s) by HOCl without phosphate, but only 0.1–0.2 years in the presence of bromide (Br) due the catalytic effects of HOBr generation. The model also predicts that the addition of phosphate will significantly inhibit Pb(ii) mineral oxidation by HOCl, but only be modestly effective in the presence of Br. This study provides insightful understanding on the effect of residual disinfectant on the oxidation of lead corrosion scales and strategies to prevent lead release from drinking water distribution systems.

Introduction

Lead (Pb) is a toxic metal that retards mental capabilities in children at low exposure doses and causes organ failure at high exposure levels.1-4 Lead pipes were commonly used in drinking water distribution systems until the 1980s, when U. S. congress amended the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) that mandated the use of “lead-free” plumbing fittings and fixtures.5,6 Despite that, lead-containing plumbing materials such as brass and tin solder are still in use, which release lead upon corrosion in drinking water distribution systems.7-11 World Health Organization (WHO) and US EPA's lead copper rule (LCR) established 10 and 15 μg L−1, respectively, as the maximum contaminant levels for lead in drinking water.12,13 However, controlling lead release in drinking water is still challenging; any abrupt changes in drinking water chemistry can disrupt the chemical equilibrium of lead corrosion scales in drinking water distribution systems, resulting in disastrous lead release. One example is the 2014–2017 Flint, Michigan, lead crisis, where the absence of phosphate addition upon a switch of water resources resulted in a rapid lead release much above its MCL.14,15 Similarly, the change of residual disinfectant from free chlorine (HOCl) to chloramine (NH2Cl) in Washington D. C. during the early 2000s released hazardous levels of lead from drinking water distribution systems.16,17 According to a recent survey conducted by USEPA on 375 water utility systems across 44 states in the US, HOCl is the preferred disinfectant in almost 259 facilities, most of which are concentrated in California, New York, Tennessee, Michigan, Ohio, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Oregon, Virginia and Wisconsin.18 Therefore, taking these factors into consideration, there is an increased need to understand the reaction kinetics between HOCl and lead minerals in drinking water distribution systems.

The speciation of lead minerals and associated redox chemistry with residual disinfectants strongly affect lead release in drinking water distribution systems. Lead exists as Pb(ii) or Pb(iv) minerals in corrosion scales. Pb(ii) carbonate minerals, cerussite PbCO3(s) and hydrocerussite Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2(s), are commonly formed in drinking water distribution systems at circumneutral pH conditions.19-26 To reduce lead solubility in equilibrium with Pb(ii) minerals, phosphate (PO43−) is commonly added to drinking water as a corrosion control strategy. Addition of PO43− leads to the formation of Pb(ii) phosphate minerals that have much lower solubilities than Pb(ii) carbonate minerals, e.g., chloropyromorphite Pb5(PO4)3Cl(s) and hydroxylpyromorphite Pb5(PO4)3OH(s).27 In drinking water with a high level of hardness, phosphohedyphane Pb3Ca2(PO4)3Cl(s) can also form.20,28,29 In the presence of HOCl as a residual disinfectant, Pb(ii) minerals are oxidized to Pb(iv) as PbO2(s),7,16,30-35 and transient intermediate Pb(iii) species are generated during the oxidative pathway.9,36,37 Considering the low solubility of PbO2(s), maintaining its predominance and stability in corrosion scales is desirable.31,38,39 Prior studies on the formation of PbO2(s) via Pb(ii) minerals oxidation quantified the reaction kinetics of Pb(ii) oxidation without a direct quantitative understanding of Pb(iv) formation rates.7,9,40 Additionally, morphological changes of platy hexagonal (hydrocerussite) and prismatic (cerussite) Pb(ii) carbonate microcrystals to nanocrystals of PbO2 were also observed during such oxidative transformational reactions.31 Though the chlorine-based kinetics data provide insights into the redox reactivities of different Pb(ii) minerals, there lacks a direct measurement of solid-phase transformation rate from Pb(ii) to Pb(iv) minerals induced by disinfectants. This missing knowledge on solid-phase transformation is critical to the understanding of lead corrosion scales and the development of corrosion control strategies.

Furthermore, water chemistry parameters impact the solid transformation of Pb(ii) minerals. For example, changes of pH and alkalinity shift the surface speciation and reactivity of Pb(ii) minerals,35 which consequently impacts the rates of PbO2(s) formation.31,41 In addition, adaptation strategies to climate change including water reuse and desalination can pose a challenge to lead control in drinking water distribution systems, especially considering the presence of elevated levels of salinity (including bromide) in these alternative water sources. In the future, bromide levels in drinking water can increase by over an order of magnitude.42,43 Elevated bromide in drinking water can catalyze HOCl oxidation via the formation of hypobromous acid (HOBr) as an electron shuttle.44 HOBr then becomes the de facto oxidant and induces much higher reaction rates with relevant Pb(ii) minerals than HOCl.45 Therefore, the effect of bromide on the formation rate of Pb(iv) needs to be better understood.

The objectives of this study are to: (1) predict the predominant lead(ii) minerals in drinking water distribution systems under different chemical conditions including pH, alkalinity, calcium, chloride and phosphate; (2) examine the oxidative transformation of Pb(ii) minerals by residual disinfectant HOCl and directly quantify the mineral phase transformation rates using start-of-the-art synchrotron techniques; (3) investigate the effects of bromide on the oxidative transformation process and Pb(iv) mineral formation rates.

Materials and methods

Pb(ii) oxidation experiments

Lead minerals including Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2(s), PbCO3(s), scrutinyite α-PbO2(s) and plattnerite β-PbO2(s) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lead(ii) phosphate minerals were synthesized using a standard precipitation method, washed with deionized (DI) water, freeze dried and confirmed for its purity using XRD.46 The precipitates and the purchased solids were then ground and sieved to a nominal size of 105 to 88 μm using mesh sieves. Fresh HOCl solutions were diluted from a 5% NaOCl stock solution. HOBr solutions were synthesized by adding 10% molar excess NaBr to a HOCl solution and equilibrated for one hour.47,48

Experiments on the oxidative transformation of lead(ii) minerals were performed in well-mixed 250 mL glass flasks at 22 °C in darkness. 5 g L−1 of lead(ii) carbonate or phosphate mineral was mixed with excess HOCl or HOBr at a molar ratio of 1 : 3 and an alkalinity of 10 mM as CaCO3. The alkalinity was achieved by using sodium carbonate that was procured from fisher scientific. Furthermore, the initial concentration of reactants was chosen to quantify solid phase reaction kinetics, and avoid alteration of redox reaction thermodynamics under drinking water chemical conditions. The solution pH was adjusted to 7 ± 0.5 and maintained by manual addition of 0.5 M HClO4 or 0.5 M NaOH whenever necessary. A pH of 7 was used to represent the redox reactivity with HOCl (pKa = 7.6) that largely drive the oxidative transformation from Pb(ii) to Pb(iv).31 Samples were taken at pre-determined time intervals and filtered with 0.1 μm filters. Retained solids were washed with 50 mL DI water to remove residual oxidant and freeze dried for subsequent solid phase analysis. Furthermore, anoxic experiments using the above experimental conditions were also conducted on both Pb(ii) carbonate and phosphate minerals in a glove box, to monitor dissolved oxygen (DO) release during the oxidation experiments that assisted the reaction mechanism investigation. DO measurements were made using an Orion Star A113 Dissolved Oxygen Benchtop Meter. [HOCl] or [HOBr] concentration, which is the sum of both [OCl] and [HOCl] in the filtered Samples was analyzed using the standard DPD method.49

Solid phase analysis

Solid phase analysis on the filter retained Samples was conducted using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to quantify the speciation and oxidation states of lead in solid samples. Specifically, XANES and EXAFS spectra were collected to monitor changes in solid fractionation of Pb(ii)/Pb(iv) and their mineralogy in solids reacted with HOCl/HOBr. X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements for Pb-LIII edge (13 035 eV) were performed at beamlines 11–2 and 4–1 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource. Prior to spectroscopic analysis, the Samples were ground and diluted using boron nitride (BN) to reach an absorption length of 1.5 cm. Measurements were taken from 12 800 to 13 925 eV (approximately 30 min per scan) to include both XANES and EXAFS regions (to k = 12). The collected spectra were then processed using Athena software,50 where the fraction of different oxidation states and different minerals were obtained by conducting a linear combination fitting (LCF) on XANES and EXAFS data, respectively. The crystal chemistry and minerals in the solid Samples were identified using a PANalytical Empyrean series 2 XRD instrument.

Equilibrium modelling and kinetics modeling

Predominant lead(ii) minerals in drinking water distribution systems under different chemical conditions were predicted based on chemical equilibria using the Geochemist's Workbench software.51 Reaction equilibrium constants were obtained from the Visual MINTEQ database.52 Additional details of geochemical modelling are provided as Text S1 in the ESI. Solid phase reaction kinetics of Pb(ii) oxidation by chlorine/bromine were modeled using second-order reaction kinetics. Details on the data fitting of the kinetics rate constants were provided in Text S2 of the ESI.

Results and discussion

Effect of alkalinity and phosphate on lead(ii) mineral speciation

Chemical equilibrium modelling of drinking water distribution systems using different corrosion control strategies suggested the formation of Pb(ii) carbonates (cerussite and hydrocerussite) and phosphates (chloropyromorphite) under relevant conditions (Fig. 1). Predominant Pb(ii) minerals in the corrosion scales of lead-containing drinking water distribution systems vary greatly based on the drinking water chemistry and implementation of corrosion control strategies. In systems that only use pH or alkalinity adjustments as the corrosion control strategy,53-56 cerussite and hydrocerussite are the predominant lead(ii) minerals (Fig. 1a), consistent with observations from prior studies.31,57 However, under these conditions, i.e., pH between 7 and 8, and alkalinity between 0 and 100 mg L−1 as CaCO3, the solubility of lead ranges between 0.1 and 1 mg L−1, which is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the World Health Organization's (WHO) international regulatory standard of ≤10 μg L−1. Another common lead corrosion control strategy in drinking water distribution system is the addition of phosphate,10,58 with a typical phosphate concentration of 0.5–2 mg L−1. Under these conditions, chemical equilibrium predicts the formation of chloropyromorphite Pb5(PO4)3Cl(s) across all relevant pH conditions (Fig. 1b). This is consistent with prior investigations where, the formation of chloropyromorphite was observed to be kinetically favorable across all pH,59 specifically in the presence of commonly observed Pb(ii) minerals in corrosion scales, cerussite31 and hydroxyapatite.60 The solubility of chloropyromorphite is much lower than either cerussite and hydrocerussite, resulting in an equilibrated soluble Pb level between 0.2 and 10 μg L−1 that is within the WHO's international regulatory standard of ≤10 μg L−1. Furthermore, in cases with increasing chloride levels, the solubility of chloropyromorphite continues to drop (Fig. S1). Therefore, for distribution systems with a high level of chloride in the water source, adding phosphate minimizes lead solubility and leaching risks.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Chemical equilibrium modeling of lead(ii) minerals in corrosion scales of drinking water systems utilizing different control strategies. Bolded line represents the total dissolved Pb(ii) concentration. Red dashed line represents the USEPA MCL for lead. T = 20 °C, green dashed line represents the WHO MCL for lead, ionic strength = 0.01 M. (a) TOTCO3 = 1 mM, [Cl] = 0.1 mM; (b) TOTCO3 = 1 mM, [Cl] = 0.1 mM, [PO43−] = 0.5 mg L−1 as PO4.

Solid-phase transformation kinetics of Pb(ii) minerals by HOCl

Transformation of Pb(ii) minerals to Pb(iv) solids by HOCl under typical drinking water chemical conditions is thermodynamically favorable, and the experimental conditions chosen for the oxidation experiments did not change the reaction thermodynamics and provided insight into the redox reactivity in actual drinking water systems (Table S1). When cerussite was exposed to chlorine, changes in the XANES spectra (acquired at Pb LIII edge) of cerussite with increasing reaction time suggested the oxidative transformation of Pb(ii) in PbCO3(s) to Pb(iv). This change was indicated by the formation of pre-edge Pb(iv) shoulder and post-edge Pb(iv) peak at 13030 and 13 060 eV, respectively (Fig. 2a).61 Linear combination fitting (LCF) of the XANES data showed that the solid phase oxidation of PbCO3(s) followed a second order reaction kinetics, where 70% of Pb(ii) in PbCO3(s) was converted to Pb(iv) within 120 minute of reaction (Fig. 2b). The second-order rate constant for this reaction was estimated to be 7.4 × 10−3 L m−2 min−1 (Fig. 3 and S2). Furthermore, results from the LCF fitting the EXAFS data confirmed that the Pb(iv) generated during the oxidative transformation of PbCO3(s) existed as PbO2 within the solids (Fig. S3a and b). This PbO2 was later confirmed as β-PbO2(s) with a trace amount of scrutinyite α-PbO2(s) using an XRD (Fig. S4). These results agree with observations reported in other investigations, where α-PbO2 and β-PbO2 were identified as the two corrosion products of PbCO3(s).20,31,40

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Oxidation of lead(ii) carbonate minerals by HOCl to PbO2(s). TOTCO3 = 10 mM, [HOCl]0 = 4.2 g L−1 as Cl2, initial Cl2: Pb(ii) = 3 : 1, T = 22 °C, pH = 7 (a) XANES of cerussite oxidation; [PbCO3(s)]0 = 5 g L−1 (b) Lead speciation in cerussite oxidation (c) XANES hydrocerussite of oxidation; [Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2(s)]0 = 5.0 g L−1 (d) Lead speciation in hydrocerussite oxidation. The black dashed lines in figures a and c represent the pre-edge feature characteristic of Pb(iv), Pb LIII edge and Pb(iv) peak, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Second-order rate constant k (L m−2 min−1) for oxidation of lead(ii) minerals using HOCl/HOBr. Reaction rate constants for Pb(ii) phosphate minerals reaction with HOCl (represented by blank bars) could not be determined. N.D = not detectable.

Similar to cerussite, the XANES spectra of hydrocerussite confirmed the oxidation of Pb(ii) to Pb(iv) by HOCl (Fig. 2c). Hydrocerussite oxidation also followed second-order reaction kinetics, where 90% of Pb(ii) was converted to Pb(iv) within 120 minutes, ~20% higher than those observed during cerussite oxidation (Fig. 2d and S2c and d). Unlike in the case of cerussite, a lag phase was observed prior to the oxidative transformation of Pb(ii) to Pb(iv) with 3.32 × 10−3 L m−2 min−1 as the estimated reaction rate constant (Fig. 3 and S5). During the lag phase, LCF of the EXAFS data suggested an exponential increase in cerussite percentage from 0% to approximately 30% and eventually dropped to 7% as the reaction proceeded (Fig. S3c and d). These XAS results further validate XRD observations made in previous investigations that identified cerussite as an intermediate product of hydrocerussite oxidation using HOCl.9,31 In contrast to the lead(ii) carbonate minerals, lead(ii) phosphate minerals showed much less reactivity with HOCl (Fig. S6-S8). No noticeable oxidation was observed even after 5 days of reaction with HOCl based on XANES and XRD data.

Effects of bromide on the solid-phase transformation kinetics of Pb(ii) minerals

Increased bromide concentrations in drinking water distribution systems results in the formation of HOBr from HOCl, which is thermodynamically capable of oxidizing Pb(ii) solids to Pb(iv) (Table S1):

HOCI+BrHOBr+Cl (Reaction 1)

To evaluate the effects of bromide, we conducted HOBr oxidation experiments on representative Pb(ii) carbonate and phosphate minerals. Experimental results and post-experiment XANES analysis on cerussite and hydrocerussite indicated 93% and 96% oxidative transformation of Pb(ii) to Pb(iv) within 30 minutes (Fig. 4a-d). Oxidative transformation of cerussite was greater with HOBr (93%) than with HOCl (70%) unlike in the case of hydrocerussite where the difference was insignificant. Both reactions (cerussite-HOBr and hydrocerussite-HOBr) followed second order reaction kinetics with 5.05 × 10−2 and 1.8 × 10−2 L m−2 min−1 as their estimated reaction constants (Fig. 3, S9 and S10). These estimated rate constants were almost an order of magnitude greater than those observed with HOCl. Therefore, indicating HOBr as an oxidant with a higher oxidation potential than HOCl, similar to prior observations made in drinking water distribution systems.45 Analytical results from XRD and EXAFS confirmed that the Pb(iv) formed from both cerussite and hydrocerussite oxidation existed as α-PbO2(s) and β-PbO2(s) within the solids (Fig. S11 and S12a-d). These results are coherent with observations made during reactions with HOCl.20,31,40

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Lead carbonates oxidation by HOBr. TOTCO3 = 10 mM, [HOBr]0 = 4.2 g as Cl2 per L (59.2 mM), initial Cl2: Pb(ii) = 3 : 1, T = 22 °C, pH = 7 (a) XANES of cerussite oxidation; [PbCO3(s)]0 = 5 g L−1 (b) Lead speciation in cerussite oxidation (c) XANES hydrocerussite of oxidation; [Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2(s)]0 = 5.0 g L−1 (d) Lead speciation in hydrocerussite oxidation. The black dashed lines in figures a and c represent the pre-edge feature characteristic of Pb(iv), Pb LIII edge and Pb(iv) peak, respectively.

Unlike reaction with HOCl, approximately 13% and 22% of Pb(ii) in hydroxylpyromorphite and chloropyromorphite, respectively, were oxidized to PbO2(s) by HOBr in just 420 minutes (Fig. 5a-d). These results agree with our thermodynamic predictions which suggested a higher susceptibility of pyromorphites to oxidize on reaction with HOBr (Table S1). For the first 120 minutes of the reaction, there was negligible oxidation in both pyromorphite(s), however, after 120 minutes there was a linear increase in the Pb(iv) fraction (Fig. 5a-d). Oxidation of both hydroxylpyromorphite and chloropyromorphite followed second-order reaction kinetics, whose reaction rate constants were estimated to be 0.34 × 10−3 L m−2 min−1 and 3.62 × 10−03 L m−2 min−1 (Fig. 3, S13 and S14). Results from EXAFS and XRD analyses indicate that only 13% of hydroxylpyromorphite and 22% of chloropyromorphite were oxidized to form β-PbO2(s) (Fig. S15a-d and S16). Chloropyromorphite exhibited a higher oxidation rate than hydroxylpyromorphite.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Oxidation of lead(ii) phosphate minerals by HOBr. TOTCO3 = 10 mM, [HOBr]0 = 4.2 g as Cl2 per L, initial Cl2: Pb(ii) = 3 : 1, T = 22 °C, pH = 7. (a) XANES of hydroxylpyromorphite oxidation; [Pb5(PO4)3OH(s)]0 = 5 g L−1 (b) Lead speciation in hydroxylpyromorphite oxidation. (c) XANES of chloropyromorphite oxidation; [Pb5(PO4)3Cl(s)]0 = 5 g L−1 (d) Lead speciation in chloropyromorphite oxidation. The black dashed lines in figures a and c represent the pre-edge feature characteristic of Pb(iv), Pb LIII edge and Pb(iv) peak, respectively.

Reaction stoichiometry and Pb(ii) mineral oxidation pathway

The molar ratio of the amount of Pb(ii) oxidized to the amount of oxidant (HOCl or HOBr), defined as Δ[Pb(ii)]/Δ[oxidant] theoretically equals one if electrons only flow between Pb(ii) solids and the oxidant. Experimental data showed that this stoichiometric molar ratio was equal to the theoretical value during the oxidation of Pb(ii) carbonate minerals by HOCl and HOBr (Fig. 6). In contrast, the stoichiometric molar ratio was significantly less than the theoretical prediction for oxidation involving Pb(ii) phosphate minerals – the molar ratio was negligible with HOCl, and ranges between 0.06 and 0.13 with HOBr (Fig. 6), indicating other reaction pathways can consume HOCl or HOBr without directly oxidizing Pb(ii) phosphate minerals.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The molar ratio between consumption of lead(ii) mineral and oxidant (Δ[Pb(ii)]/Δ[oxidant]) during reaction with HOCl and HOBr. The ratio for Pb(ii) phosphate minerals during reaction with HOCl (represented by blank bars) could not be determined, as Pb(ii) consumption was negligible. N.D = not detectable (no Pb(ii) oxidation was observed). Minor deviations from 1 for Pb-carbonate minerals were observed due to non-ideal behavior of the reaction.

Additional oxidation experiments with Pb(ii) phosphate minerals under anaerobic conditions showed that dissolved oxygen was generated when HOBr was consumed in comparison to the control (Fig. S17). This observation indicates the disproportionation of HOBr into bromide and oxygen, a process that can be catalyzed by Pb intermediates. Prior studies observed short-lived Pb(iii) hydroxyl aqua complex intermediates – typically existing as Pb(OH)2(H2O)•+ and Pb(OH)3(H2O)2 at circumneutral pH ranges – are generated during the rapid hydroxyl radical-driven oxidation of Pb(ii).36,37 Pb(iii) intermediates can subsequently disproportionate and withdraw electrons from its hydroxyl groups, thus converting itself back to Pb(ii) and generating dissolved oxygen.

Environmental implications

This study offers findings through a comprehensive examination of solid transformation of lead minerals by residual disinfectants in drinking water distribution systems. Chemical equilibrium simulations suggest that cerussite and hydrocerussite are relevant Pb(ii) minerals in the absence of phosphate, whereas chloropyromorphite is the predominant Pb(ii) mineral in the presence of phosphate. To further evaluate the importance of bromide on the oxidative transformation of Pb(ii) minerals in drinking water distribution systems, a kinetic model was established to predict the time it takes to convert 90% of Pb(ii)-containing surface layer of corrosion scales to PbO2(s) (Text S3). The data predict that it takes up 0.6–1.2 years to oxidize 90% of Pb(ii) carbonate minerals in drinking water distribution systems with HOCl but only takes 0.1–0.2 years in the presence of trace levels of bromide (Fig. 7). In contrast, oxidation is much slower in systems with phosphate, taking 50–55 years and approximately 1.6–1.8 years to oxidize 90% of Pb(ii) phosphate minerals at very low (0.018 mg L−1) and high (3.2 mg L−1) bromide levels, respectively (Fig. 7, Text S3). Oxidation of Pb(ii) minerals to PbO2(s) is a desirable lead mitigation strategy considering the low solubility of PbO2(s), although other factors such as the presence of natural organic matter may enhance colloidal mobilization of PbO2(s) particles leading to higher overall lead exposure.34,62,63 Further work is needed to investigate the effects of Pb(iv) formation and associated chemistry on the control of lead release.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Time required to oxidize 90% of different Pb(ii) minerals to Pb(iv) in drinking water distribution systems utilizing HOCl in the presence of varying bromide concentrations pH = 7, T = 22 °C, [oxidant]ss = 0.5 mg L−1 as Cl2. Cross and squares markers represent values predicted based on the minimum (0 mg L−1) and maximum (3.2 mg L−1) bromide concentration, respectively. Whiskers represent predictions based on the 5 percentile and 95 percentile distributions of bromide concentrations. Horizontal lines of the box plot represent predictions based on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartile of bromide concentration distribution.

Supplementary Material

Manuscript SI

Water impact.

Lead redox chemistry associated with residual disinfectants controls lead release from corrosion scales in drinking water distribution systems. This study acquired an in-depth understanding on the solid-phase transformation kinetics of Pb(ii)/Pb(iv) minerals via the oxidation of free chlorine and bromine. Findings from this study are of interest to scientists, engineers and practitioners concerned with mechanisms that affect lead release in drinking water, and its control.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants to H. Liu from U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER Program (CBET-1653931) and the University of California Multicampus Research Programs and Initiatives award (MRP-17-455083), and to J. Orta from the Department of Education GAANN Fellowship (P200A180038). We thank Steven Crumly from the University La Verne for participating in this project. M. J. Abernathy was supported by a T32 Training Grant from the National institute of Health (T32 ES018827). We also thank Ryan Davis, Matthew Latimer, and Erik Nelson for help with data collection at SSRL. Portions of this research were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, a Directorate of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science by Stanford University.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d0ew00706d

References

  • 1.Stokes LO, Onwuche NC, Thomas P and Davies-Cole JO, Blood lead levels in residents of homes with elevated lead in tap water. District of Columbia, 2004, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep, 2004, 53(12), 268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferrie JP, Rolf K and Troesken W, Cognitive disparities, lead plumbing, and water chemistry: Prior exposure to water-borne lead and intelligence test scores among World War Two US Army enlistees, Econ. Hum. Biol, 2012, 10(1), 98–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gidlow D, Lead toxicity, Occup. Med, 2004, 54(2), 76–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abadin H, Ashizawa A and Stevens YW, Toxicological profile for lead, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, USA, 1988. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.EPA, U. S., Lead Ban: Preventing the Use of Lead in Public Water Systems and Plumbing Used for Drinking Water, National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), 1989, https://nepis.epa.gov. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Calabrese EJ, Safe Drinking Water Act, CRC Press, 1986, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu H, Korshin GV and Ferguson JF, Interactions of Pb(II)/Pb(IV) solid phases with chlorine and their effects on lead release, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2009, 43(9), 3278–3284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu H, Schonberger KD, Korshin GV, Ferguson JF, Meyerhofer P, Desormeaux E and Luckenbach H, Effects of blending of desalinated water with treated surface drinking water on copper and lead release, Water Res., 2010, 44(14), 4057–4066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim EJ and Herrera JE, Characteristics of lead corrosion scales formed during drinking water distribution and their potential influence on the release of lead and other contaminants, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2010, 44(16), 6054–6061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ng D-Q, Strathmann TJ and Lin Y-P, Role of orthophosphate as a corrosion inhibitor in chloraminated solutions containing tetravalent lead corrosion product PbO2, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2012, 46(20), 11062–11069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Triantafyllidou S, Schock MR, DeSantis MK and White C, Low contribution of PbO2-coated lead service lines to water lead contamination at the tap, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2015, 49(6), 3746–3754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.EPA, U. S., Maximum contaminant level goals and national primary drinking water regulations for lead and copper, 1987, pp. 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Edition F, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, WHO Chron., 2011, 38(4), 104–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olson TM, Wax M, Yonts J, Heidecorn K, Haig S-J, Yeoman D, Hayes Z, Raskin L and Ellis BR, Forensic estimates of lead release from lead service lines during the Water Crisis in Flint, Michigan, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett, 2017, 4(9), 356–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pieper KJ, Tang M and Edwards MA, Flint water crisis caused by interrupted corrosion control: Investigating “ground zero” home, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2017, 51(4), 2007–2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edwards M and Dudi A, Role of chlorine and chloramine in corrosion of lead-bearing plumbing materials, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2004, 96(10), 69–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Renner R, Plumbing the depths of DC's drinking water crisis, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2004, 38(12), 224A–227A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.American Water Works Association (AWWA), 2017 Water Utility Disinfection Survey Report, 2018, https://www.awwa.org/2017DisinfectionSurveyReport.pdf.
  • 19.Liu H, Korshin GV, Ferguson JF and Jiang W, Key parameters and kinetics of oxidation of lead (II) solid phases by chlorine in drinking water, Water Pract. Technol, 2006, 1(4), wpt2006092. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pan W, Pan C, Bae Y and Giammar D, Role of Manganese in Accelerating the Oxidation of Pb (II) Carbonate Solids to Pb(IV) Oxide at Drinking Water Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2019, 53(12), 6699–6707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DeSantis MK, Triantafyllidou S, Schock MR and Lytle DA, Mineralogical evidence of galvanic corrosion in drinking water lead pipe joints, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2018, 52(6), 3365–3374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Masters S, Welter GJ and Edwards M, Seasonal variations in lead release to potable water, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2016, 50(10), 5269–5277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lytle DA and Schock MR, Formation of Pb (IV) oxides in chlorinated water, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2005, 97(11), 102–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tully J, DeSantis MK and Schock MR, Water quality–pipe deposit relationships in Midwestern lead pipes, AWWA Water Sci., 2019, 1(2), e1127. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bae Y, Pasteris JD and Giammar DE, Impact of orthophosphate on lead release from pipe scale in high pH, low alkalinity water, Water Res., 2020, 115764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rego C and Schock M in Discovery of unforeseen lead level optimization issues for high pH and low DIC conditions, Water Quality and Technology Conference, Charlotte, NC, November, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Colling J, Whincup P and Hayes C, The measurement of plumbosolvency propensity to guide the control of lead in tapwaters, Water Environ. J, 1987, 1(3), 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hopwood JD, Derrick GR, Brown DR, Newman CD, Haley J, Kershaw R and Collinge M, The identification and synthesis of lead apatite minerals formed in lead water pipes, J. Chem, 2016, 2016(11p), 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bae Y, Pasteris JD and Giammar DE, The Ability of Phosphate To Prevent Lead Release from Pipe Scale When Switching from Free Chlorine to Monochloramine, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2020, 54(2), 879–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lytle DA and Schock MR, Formation of Pb(IV) oxides in chlorinated water, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2005, 97(11), 102–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu H, Korshin GV and Ferguson JF, Investigation of the kinetics and mechanisms of the oxidation of cerussite and hydrocerussite by chlorine, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2008, 42(9), 3241–3247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schock M and Giani R, Oxidant/disinfectant chemistry and impacts on lead corrosion, Proc. 2004 AWWA WQTC, San Antonio, Texas, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schock M, Harmon S, Swertfeger J and Lohmann R, in Tetravalent lead: a hitherto unrecognized control of tap water lead contamination, Water Quality Technology Conference, American Water Works Association, Nashville, TN, 2001, pp. 2270–2291. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McNeill LS and Edwards M, Importance of Pb and Cu particulate species for corrosion control, Environ. Eng, 2004, 130(2), 136–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davidson C, Peters N, Britton A, Brady L, Gardiner P and Lewis B, Surface analysis and depth profiling of corrosion products formed in lead pipes used to supply low alkalinity drinking water, Water Sci. Technol, 2004, 49(2), 49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mosseri S, Henglein A and Janata E, Trivalent lead as an intermediate in the oxidation of lead (II) and the reduction of lead (IV) species, J. Phys. Chem, 1990, 94(6), 2722–2726. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu H, Kuznetsov AM, Masliy AN, Ferguson JF and Korshin GV, Formation of Pb (III) intermediates in the electrochemically controlled Pb(II)/PbO2 system, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2012, 46(3), 1430–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vasquez FA, Heaviside R, Tang Z and Taylor JS, Effect of free chlorine and chloramines on lead release in a distribution system, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2006, 98(2), 144–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rajasekharan VV, Clark BN, Boonsalee S and Switzer JA, Electrochemistry of free chlorine and monochloramine and its relevance to the presence of Pb in drinking water, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2007, 41(12), 4252–4257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Y, Xie Y, Li W, Wang Z and Giammar DE, Formation of lead (IV) oxides from lead (II) compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2010, 44(23), 8950–8956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schock MR and Gardels MC, Plumbosolvency reduction by high pH and low carbonate—solubility relationships, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 1983, 75(2), 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taylor J, Dietz J, Randall A and Hong S, Impact of RO-desalted water on distribution water qualities, Water Sci. Technol, 2005, 51(6–7), 285–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McTigue NE, Cornwell DA, Graf K and Brown R, Occurrence and consequences of increased bromide in drinking water sources, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2014, 106(11), E492–E508. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Allard S, Fouche L, Dick J, Heitz A and Von Gunten U, Oxidation of manganese (II) during chlorination: role of bromide, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2013, 47(15), 8716–8723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Orta J, Patton S and Liu H, Bromide-assisted catalytic oxidation of lead(II) solids by chlorine in drinking water distribution systems, Chem. Commun, 2017, 53(62), 8695–8698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu Y, Zhu Z, Zhao X, Liang Y and Huang Y, Characterization, dissolution, and solubility of lead hydroxypyromorphite [Pb5(PO4)3OH] at 25–45° C, J. Chem, 2015, 17(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jolley RL and Carpenter JH, Aqueous chemistry of chlorine: chemistry, analysis, and environmental fate of reactive oxidant species, Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA), 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chebeir M and Liu H, Kinetics and mechanisms of Cr(VI) formation via the oxidation of Cr(III) solid phases by chlorine in drinking water, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2016, 50(2), 701–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD and Clesceri LS, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, 2012, vol. 10. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ravel B and Newville M, Athena, Artemis, Hephaestus: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT, J. Synchrotron Radiat, 2005, 12(4), 537–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bethke CM, Geochemical and biogeochemical reaction modeling, Cambridge University Press, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gustafsson J, Visual MINTEQ ver. 3.1, ed. Gustafasson JP, KTH, Sweden, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boffardi B, Lead corrosion JN Engl. Water Works Assoc, 1995, 109(2), 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Johnson B, Yorton R, Tran T and Kim J, Evaluation of corrosion control alternatives to meet the lead and copper rule for Eastern Massachusetts, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schock MR, Understanding corrosion control strategies for lead, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 1989, 81(7), 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tang Z, Hong S, Xiao W and Taylor J, Impacts of blending ground, surface, and saline waters on lead release in drinking water distribution systems, Water Res., 2006, 40(5), 943–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Boyd GR, Dewis KM, Korshin GV, Reiber SH, Schock MR, Sandvig AM and Giani R, Effects of changing disinfectants on lead and copper release, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2008, 100(11), 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Duranceau SJ, Lintereur PA and Taylor JS, Effects of orthophosphate corrosion inhibitor on lead in blended water quality environments, Desalin. Water Treat, 2010, 13(1–3), 348–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang P and Ryan JA, Transformation of Pb (II) from cerrusite to chloropyromorphite in the presence of hydroxyapatite under varying conditions of pH, Environ. Sci. Technol, 1999, 33(4), 625–630. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Peng C-Y, Korshin GV, Valentine RL, Hill AS, Friedman MJ and Reiber SH, Characterization of elemental and structural composition of corrosion scales and deposits formed in drinking water distribution systems, Water Res., 2010, 44(15), 4570–4580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schock MR, Scheckel KG, DeSantis M and Gerke TL, Mode of occurrence, treatment, and monitoring significance of tetravalent lead, Proc. 2005 AWWA WQTC, Quebec City, Quebec, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Triantafyllidou S, Parks J and Edwards M, Lead particles in potable water, J. – Am. Water Works Assoc, 2007, 99(6), 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Korshin G and Liu H, Preventing the colloidal dispersion of Pb (iv) corrosion scales and lead release in drinking water distribution systems, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol, 2019, 5(7), 1262–1269. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Manuscript SI

RESOURCES