ABSTRACT
Information regarding the lactational performance of mares in relation to metabolic parameters can help practitioners to manipulate animal rearing management for sustainable mare milk production. The aim of this study was to characterize the lactational performance of Mongolian native mares grazing on natural pastureland by revealing the seasonal effects on metabolic parameters. In this study, 8 multiparous mares were used. Milk yield and composition and serum metabolic parameters, such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), glucose (GLU), triacylglycerol, total cholesterol (TCH), non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA), albumin, urea, total protein, cortisol (Cort), and insulin, were determined at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, and 270 days of lactation. During the lactation period, milk yield peaked at around the 90th day and declined sharply in the following period. While the milk fat and protein contents decreased gradually from the early stages of lactation to the late stages, the lactose content was highest at mid-lactation and stayed constant until the end of the lactation period. Meanwhile, changes were observed between the stages of lactation, and the differences in metabolic parameters were significant (P<0.05), except for AST and GLU. The strongest correlation was found with NEFA (P<0.01), followed by the Cort (P<0.05) concentration, with both parameters showing negative correlation, and strong positive correlation was detected between the milk yield and TCH (P<0.05) concentration.
Keywords: lactation, metabolic parameter, milk composition, milk yield
Horse husbandry represents one of the most promising livestock sectors in Mongolia and involves not only activities in which horses are used for work, tourism, and racing but also activities in which they are used for food products, both meat and milk. Because of the small volume of the mammary gland [9], milk harvesting can be carried out several times per day, making the dairy equine enterprise different from that with conventional dairy species in terms of both the management of dams and foals and milking practice [22]. In Central Asia, mares are milked 4–5 times per day, with milking beginning at least 2 hr after foal separation from the mother [4]. The farming system is a major cause of variability in equine milk production [4, 20]. In Mongolia, fermented mare’s milk, airag, has traditionally been produced at the household level, and its production is severely limited by seasonality due to the nature of pastoral livestock husbandry, which relies entirely on natural pastureland. Thus, milk from mares is basically only obtainable in warmer seasons (from June to October). Nowadays, airag is produced in an industrialised manner and is offered to consumers in urbanised communities year-round. For future interventions to get better production in terms of both quantity and quality, it is essential to understand the relationship of mare lactational performance with metabolic responses, with consideration of seasonal effects. Milk production is affected by many factors, including the farming system, nutrition and feeding, strategy and type of milking (manual or mechanical), individual milkability, stage of lactation, and size and body condition of the animals, in addition to genetics [26]. Lactation involves the mobilization and export of substantial quantities of nutrients in milk [25], which mainly affects the metabolism and induces stress, resulting in the variation of haemato-biochemical parameters [19] and biochemical constituents of blood through adjustments to maintain homeostasis [28]. The metabolic profile is a useful tool to determine if homeostatic mechanisms are capable of maintaining blood parameters under different feeding and housing conditions [17], and the determination of metabolic parameters can identify energy metabolism disturbances. The emerging niche market of equine milk raises questions on appropriate management strategies of dam and foals, as mainly related to animal nutrition as well as environmental issues, besides food security and animal welfare [22]. Barely any information in this regard is available in the Mongolian context and even in industrialized countries where the use of mare milk is emerging. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize lactational performance of mares kept on natural pastureland by revealing the seasonal effects on metabolic parameters.
Materials and Methods
Research site
The research was carried out 110 km east of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, in Bayandelger soum, Tuv province, next to Baganuur district (47°47.50 N, 108°20.40 E, 1,360 m above sea level). The area has been described as having a continental semi-arid climate and to be covered by steppe vegetation, and the annual mean air temperature and precipitation for 2004 to 2019 was −1.8°C and 256.8 mm, respectively [24].
Mares and rearing management
Eight mares, aged 7–12 years, from two separate harems of a herdsman living at the research site were used in this study. During the milking season, the herdsman milked around 30 mares, and those mares were divided into four harems, each headed by a stallion. Each harem was composed of milking mares and non-milking horses, such as fillies, colts, yearlings, and castrated male horses. In total, there were over a hundred horses, and the pasture was shared by other ruminant livestock species, including cattle, sheep, and goats belonging to the herdsman. Places where nomadic people were taking care of horses and milking horses in summer are shown in Fig. 1. The winter camp of the herdsman was around 15 km away from the summer camp. Horses were reared in the traditional manner of keeping them on natural pasture without the provision of any feed during the study, except for watering with well water when there was no snow or rain. The plant species where the mares were reared are shown in Table 1, and they were previously described by Nakano et al. [24]. The pasture conditions and air temperatures around the sampling area are described in a modified version of the schematic diagram (Fig. 1) presented in the previous study of Bat-Oyun et al. [3], due to the use of similar traditional Mongolian pastures.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of the pasture conditions and air temperature of the sampling area.
Table 1. Plant species where the mares were reared (described by Nakano et al. [24]).
| Palatability | Life duration | Abbreviation | Plant species found at the study sites |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palatable | Annual | PAF | Dontostemon integrifolius, Draba integrifolia, Heteropappus hispidus, Salsola collina, S. ruthenica |
| Palatable | Annual | PAG | Setaria viridis |
| Palatable | Perennial | PPF | Allium anisopodium, A. bidentatum, A. odorum, Arenaria capillaris, Asparagus dahuricus, Aster alpinus, Carex duriuscula, C. korshinskyi, Carum carvi, Gallium verum, Leontopodium ochroleucum, Medicago ruthenica, Plantago depressa, Potentilla acaulis, P. bifurca, Ptilotrichum canescens, Pulsatilla ambigua, Sibbaldianthe adpressa, Taraxacum dissectum |
| Palatable | Perennial | PPG | Agropyron cristatum, Agrostis trinii, Cleistogenes squarrosa, Elymus chinensis, Poa attenuata, Stipa krylovii |
| Palatable | Perennial | PPL | Astragalus laguroides, A. scaberrimus, Caragana microphylla, C. pygmaea, C. stenophylla |
| Palatable | Perennial | PPS | Artemisia frigida |
| Unpalatable | Annual | UAF | Bassia dasyphylla, Chenopodium acuminatum, C. album, C. aristatum |
| Unpalatable | Annual | UAS | Artemisia palustris, A. sieversiana |
| Unpalatable | Perennial | UPF | Convolvulus ammanii, Ephedra sinica, Haplophyllum dahuricum, Limonium flexuosum, Linaria acutiloba, Myosotis suaveolens, Potentilla tanacetifolia, Serratula centauroides, Stellera chamaejasme |
| Unpalatable | Perennial | UPL | Astragalus galactites |
| Unpalatable | Perennial | UPS | Artemisia adamsii, A. dracunculus, A. mongolica |
Sample collection
Milk yield and composition and serum metabolic parameters were determined at about 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, and 270 days postpartum, which corresponded to June, July, August, September, October, November, December, January, and February, respectively. First, five samples were collected during routine milking by the herdsman at his summer camp. The rest of the samples were collected at the herdsman’s winter camp after gathering the horses from the pasture in the early morning on the day of sample collection. During sample collection (milking), foals were caught and tied up to prevent suckling. Milk was collected by a traditional method. Briefly, at each milking, the mare’s foal was allowed to suckle the first stream of milk until ejection occurred, and then milk was collected by hand-milking, trying to empty the mammary gland as much as possible, with the foal in close proximity. Milking was repeated 5 times a day at two-hour intervals. Between each milking, mares were free to graze nearby. Samples for compositional analysis were obtained from daily pooled milk, cooled immediately, and kept cool until laboratory tests were performed. Serum was collected individually into vacutainer collection tubes from the jugular vein before the first milking was performed on each day of sample collection. Sample collection was terminated in February because of a significant decrease in the milk yield to below100 ml per milking.
Determination of the yield and composition of the milk
Immediately after milking, the milk yield was measured volumetrically on an individual basis, and the mean milk yield was calculated from the measurements taken for all mares on each day of sample collection or the measurements taken for all mares on each day of sampling. Milk protein, fat, and lactose were measured using an infrared milk analyzer (MilkoScan Minor, Foss, Hillerød, Denmark).
Determination of the serum metabolic parameters
Blood samples were centrifuged to separate serum, and the sera were stored at −20°C until they were analyzed for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), glucose (GLU), triacylglycerol (TAG), total cholesterol (TCH), albumin (ALB), urea (Ure), and total protein (TP) using an automatic biochemical analyzer (Alizé, Lisabio, France). The concentrations of cortisol (Cort), insulin (Ins), and non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (EIA-1887, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; EIA-2935, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany; and Ab65341, Abcam, Cambridge, U.K., respectively). Samples were assayed in duplicate according to the instructions of the assay kits. Based on the standards provided with the kits, the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.0% and 8.7%, 5.4% and 9.5%, and 7.3% and 11.5% for NEFA, Cort, and Ins, respectively.
Statistical analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, U.S.A.) was used for statistical analyses. Repeated measures ANOVA, followed by the Fisher’s LSD test, was used to evaluate changes in variables. The level of significance was set at P<0.05. Results are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between milk yield metabolic parameters.
This research study was approved by the Ethical Committee on the Use of Animals in Research of the Mongolian University of Life Sciences.
Results
Changes in milk yield and milk composition
The changes in milk yield and composition during lactation are shown in Fig. 2. The peak of the milk yield occurred at about 90 days of lactation, and the milk yield declined along with lactation stage.
Fig. 2.
Changes in milk yield and composition. A, yield; B, protein; C, fat; D, lactose. aP<0.05 for 90 vs. 30, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 days. bP<0.05 for 60 vs. 30 and 180 days. cP<0.05 for 30 vs. 150, 180, 210, and 240 days. dP<0.05 for 60 vs. 210 and 240 days. eP<0.05 for 120 vs. 270 days. fP<0.05 for 120 vs. 30 days.
While the milk protein and fat contents decreased gradually from the early stages of lactation to the late lactation stages (Fig. 2B and 2C), the lactose content was highest at mid-lactation and remained constant until lactation ended (Fig. 2D). All these changes were statistically significant (P<0.05).
In total, eleven serum metabolic parameters including two hormones, Ins and Cort, were measured at different lactation stages along with milk yield. Table 2 shows the changes in these parameters. The results of statistical analysis indicated that the changes in the parameters were significant (P<0.05), except for AST and GLU.
Table 2. Concentrations of serum metabolic parameters and milk yield during lactation.
| Metabolic parameters | Lactation stages, month | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | P-value | ||
| ALT, IU/l | Mean | 6.5b | 9.6b | 12.4a | 5.9 | 11.7b | 9.1a | 11.6 | 20.8 | 23.6 | <0.05 |
| SD | 2.0 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 6.9 | 9.6 | 11.4 | ||
| AST, IU/l | Mean | 152.0 | 179.1 | 203.3 | 248.1 | 233.7 | 226.3 | 226.0 | 190.9 | 201.6 | ns |
| SD | 47.5 | 3.8 | 88.4 | 19.5 | 9.1 | 40.4 | 42.0 | 3.5 | 38.8 | ||
| GLU, mg/dl | Mean | 80.7 | 74.1 | 75.0 | 71.7 | 68.3 | 75.4 | 75.3 | 69.5 | 71.9 | ns |
| SD | 17.6 | 3.9 | 21.2 | 9.7 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 3.3 | 18.7 | ||
| TAG, mmol/l | Mean | 19.1 | 20.1 | 20.7a | 39.5 | 21.7b | 17.6a,b | 16.7a | 30.8a | 34.5 | <0.05 |
| SD | 6.3 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 23.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 12.8 | ||
| TCH, mmol/l | Mean | 44.5 | 47.8b | 87.6 | 63.9a | 42.8b | 38.2 | 32.3a | 41.5 | 46.4 | <0.05 |
| SD | 5.5 | 3.3 | 33.9 | 14.8 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 6.1 | ||
| NEFA, mmol/l | Mean | 106.4a-d | 33.6a-d | 42.0a-d | 33.6a-d | 182.0a-c | 264.0 | 263.3 | 333.3b | 446.7a | <0.05 |
| SD | 19.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 14.6 | 32.4 | 188.9 | 127.4 | 20.8 | 30.6 | ||
| Alb, g/l | Mean | 19.1a-c | 28.2a,b,d | 43.0b | 25.1a | 28.6b,c | 21.4a,b | 24.4a,b,d | 44.0a | 31.7 | <0.05 |
| SD | 4.3 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 12.7 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 0.7 | 4.6 | 6.0 | ||
| Ure, mmol/l | Mean | 69.0 | 95.2b | 92.7c | 128.4 | 101.1a | 88.8d | 61.2b,c | 63.6a-c | 62.4a-c | <0.05 |
| SD | 18.2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 52.7 | 4.8 | 9.2 | 13.6 | 4.5 | 6.3 | ||
| TP, g/l | Mean | 35.6 | 55.6a-c | 72.9 | 74.3 | 78.2a | 76.1b | 68.9 | 72.8 | 68.1a,c | <0.05 |
| SD | 22.0 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 8.9 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 11.6 | 17.4 | 4.1 | ||
| Cort, µg/ml | Mean | 400.8a | 215.7a-c,e-g | 199.1a-g | 268.2a-c,e | 256.6a-c,f | 265.3a-c | 353.5a,c | 354.3a,b | 329.0d | <0.05 |
| SD | 4.5 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 29.6 | 21.8 | 7.1 | 32.7 | ||
| Ins, µIU | Mean | 5.7a | 5.3 | 6.4 | 10.5 | 6.3 | 3.8a,b | 4.0a,b | 3.8a | 4.0a | <0.05 |
| SD | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
Alb:aP<0.05 for Jan vs. Jun, Jul, Sep, Oct, Nov, and Dec. bP<0.05 for Aug vs. Jun, Jul, Oct, Nov, and Dec. cP<0.05 for Oct vs. Jun and Dec. dP<0.05 for Jul vs. Dec. Alt:aP<0.05 for Aug vs. Nov. bP<0.05 for Oct vs. June and July. Urea:aP<0.05 for Oct vs. Jan and Feb. bP<0.05 for Jul vs. Dec, Jan, and Feb. cP<0.05 for Aug vs. Dec, Jun, and Feb. TCH:aP<0.05 for Sep vs. Dec. bP<0.05 for Jul vs. Oct. TAG:aP<0.05 for Jan vs. Aug, Nov, and Dec. bP<0.05 for Oct vs. Nov. TP:aP<0.05 for Oct vs. Jul and Feb. bP<0.05 for Nov vs. Jul. cP<0.05 for Feb vs. Jul. NEFA:aP<0.05 for Feb vs. Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, and Oct. bP<0.05 for Jan vs. Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, and Oct. cP<0.05 for Oct vs. Jun, Jul, Aug, and Sep. dP<0.05 for Jun vs. Jul, Aug, and Sep. Cort:aP<0.05 for Jun vs. Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec, and Jan. bP<0.05 for Jan vs. Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, and Nov. cP<0.05 for Dec vs. Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, and Nov. dP<0.05 for Feb vs. Jul, and Aug. eP<0.05 for Sep vs. Jul and Aug. fP<0.05 for Oct vs. Jul and Aug. gP<0.05 for Jul vs. Aug. Ins:aP<0.05 for Jun vs. Nov, Dec, Jan, and Feb. bP<0.05 for Dec vs. Nov.
To determine the association between milk yield and metabolic parameters, Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted. The strongest correlation was found with NEFA (P<0.01), followed by the Cort (P<0.05) concentration, with both parameters showing negative correlation, and strong positive correlation was detected between the milk yield and TCH (P<0.05) concentration (Table 3).
Table 3. Pearson Correlation between milk yield and serum metabolic parameters.
| Alb | Alt | Ure | Cho | Tag | TP | NEFA | Cort | Ins | Yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alb | 1 | |||||||||
| Alt | 0.638 | 1 | ||||||||
| Ure | −0.135 | −0.596 | 1 | |||||||
| TCH | 0.484 | −0.131 | 0.489 | 1 | ||||||
| TAG | 0.272 | 0.359 | 0.277 | 0.231 | 1 | |||||
| TP | 0.405 | 0.295 | 0.314 | 0.135 | 0.276 | 1 | ||||
| NEFA | 0.139 | 0.800** | −0.695* | −0.566 | 0.182 | 0.267 | 1 | |||
| Cort | −0.263 | 0.220 | −0.687* | −0.591 | 0.070 | −0.457 | 0.510 | 1 | ||
| Ins | −0.127 | −0.561 | 0.852** | 0.564 | 0.469 | 0.074 | −0.698* | −0.338 | 1 | |
| Yield | 0.155 | −0.524 | 0.584 | 0.730* | −0.188 | −0.196 | −0.905** | −0.699* | 0.517 | 1 |
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Furthermore, when plotted graphically (Fig. 3A), the elevation in the NEFA concentration and decrease in the milk yield crossed at approximately the 165th day of lactation.
Fig. 3.
Correlation between milk yield and non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) (A), milk yield and cortisol (B), and milk yield and cholesterol (C).
Discussion
The patterns of changes in the fat, protein, and lactose contents of milk during lactation in the present study were generally consistent with those obtained from Quarter horse mares [12], Italian heavy draft mares [7], Lusitano mares [27], and Martina Franca jennies [8]. However, in the current study, the peak of the milk yield in the Mongolian native grazing mares was observed slightly later in the lactation period (at about 90 days) than in Quarter horse mares [12], Italian heavy draft mares [7], Lusitano mares [27], and Martina Franca jennies [8], among which the peaks occurred at about 30, 69, 31, and 48 days postpartum, respectively. The later peak of the milk yield may be characteristic of the abundance and preference of grassland forage from natural pastures.
Post-foaling energetic demands continue with milk production to meet foal nutritional needs, while mares also require energy to recover in the postpartum period [16]. After foaling, the mare’s biochemical profile is altered [28], with adjustments occurring during gestation and lactation, even as homeostatic mechanisms ensure that individual components remain constant [15]. Therefore, the majority of these changes were partly characterized by the mares’ responses to seasonality and the demands of reproductive physiology.
For the assessment of energy balance, NEFA is one of the most important tools when considering an animal’s health, productive, and reproductive performance [10]. Serum NEFA is assessed as an indicator for the mobilization of lipids from the adipose tissues, thus reflecting the status of energetic balance in the body, and the serum NEFA concentration has been found to be elevated during times of insufficient feed supply [29, 30]. In this study, the lower serum NEFA concentrations and greater amounts of milk recorded from the 60 to 120 days of lactation period (Fig. 3A), which covers July to September, correspond to the blossomy season in Mongolia in terms of feed availability and physical condition for pasture-based livestock animals. Studies on dairy cows revealed that reduced concentrations of GLU and Ins in dairy cows led to elevated TAG hydrolysis and increased availability of NEFA for metabolism [5], but these processes have not been fully elucidated in horses [16]. The NEFA concentration is used as an indicator of lipid degradation in adipose tissue [1, 2] and reflects the status of the energy balance of the body [16]. The high levels of NEFA in the present study during the last half of lactation could be a consequence of mobilization of body fat due to the restriction of feeding with natural grasses, and they were consistent with the above studies.
The point at which the elevation in NEFA crossed the decrease in milk yield may be a threshold indicating when lactating mares enter a negative energy balance state for lactational performance. The similar patterns of change in the serum NEFA and Cort concentrations (Fig. 3B) support the physiological background for this. Cort influences the intermediary metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats and accelerates gluconeogenesis and lipolysis via the release of glycerol and NEFA as an antagonist of Ins [11, 13]. High levels of Cort have been found in sheep in autumn and winter and might be associated with a decreased environmental temperature [29]. In the present study, a decrease in serum Cort was associated with an increase in milk yield or an increase in serum Cort was associated with a decrease in milk yield, and the two parameters crossed each other on the 160th day of lactation when plotted on a graph. Synthesis and secretion of Cort is accelerated by various stressors, like detrimental ambient temperatures, and feeding and handling of animals [6, 14, 21, 23, 31]. The serum Cort levels gradually increased from mid-lactation to the end of lactation in the present study, and the authors suggest that this could be attributed to the Mongolian mares with pastoral herding experiencing energy loss or a negative energy balance this during period.
Serum TCH is a part of the lipoprotein complex, and it is closely related to milk production [2]. Kida reported that serum TCH showed an obvious positive relationship with milk production in dairy cows [18]. In this study, TCH also showed a strong positive correlation with milk yield (Fig. 3C).
With barely any information available on this topic, this work attempted to characterize the lactational performance of Mongolian native grazing mares in relation to metabolic parameters. Further study is necessary to develop an assessment tool that can help obtain greater amounts of milk by increasing both the quantity obtained from milking and the length of the milking period through management of the nutrition and rearing of mares.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported within the framework of the JICA project for “Strengthening the Capacity for Human Resource Development in the Field of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry” implemented at School of Veterinary Medicine of Mongolian University of Life Sciences (2014–2020). The authors are grateful to Professor Takashi Umemura, who was the senior expert in the project unit, and Professor Motohiro Horiuchi, who was an adviser at Hokkaido University, Japan.
References
- 1.Aoki T., Kimura Y., Oya A., Chiba A., Ishii M., Nambo Y. 2016. Hematological and biochemical features of postpartum fever in the heavy draft mare. J. Equine Sci. 27: 13–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bartley J.C. 1989. Lipid metabolism and diseases. pp. 108–142. In: Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals (Kanenko, J.J. ed.), Academic Press, Orland. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bat-Oyun T., Erdenetsetseg B., Shinoda M., Ozaki T., Morinaga Y. 2015. Who is making airag (Fermented mare’s milk)? A nationwide survey of traditional food in Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples. 19: 7–29. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bat-Oyun T., Ito T.Y., Purevdorj Y., Shinoda M., Ishii S., Buho H., Morinaga Y. 2018. Movements of dams milked for fermented horse milk production in Mongolia. Anim. Sci. J. 89: 219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bisinotto R., Greco L., Ribeiro E., Martinez N., Lima F., Staples C., Thatcher W., Santos J. 2012. Influences of nutrition and metabolism on fertility of dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 9: 260–272. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Caroprese M., Albenzio M., Marzano A., Schena L., Annicchiarico G., Sevi A. 2010. Relationship between cortisol response to stress and behavior, immune profile, and production performance of dairy ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 93: 2395–2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Centoducati P., Maggiolino A., De Palo P., Tateo A. 2012. Application of Wood’s model to lactation curve of Italian heavy draft horse mares. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 5770–5775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.D’Alessandro A.G., Martemucci G. 2012. Lactation curve and effects of milking regimen on milk yield and quality, and udder health in Martina Franca jennies (Equus asinus). J. Anim. Sci. 90: 669–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dzidic A., Knopf L., Bruckmaier R.M. 2002. Oxytocin release and milk removal in machine-milked mares. Milchwiss. Milk Sci. Int 57: 423–424. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Esposito G., Irons P.C., Webb E.C., Chapwanya A. 2014. Interactions between negative energy balance, metabolic diseases, uterine health and immune response in transition dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 144: 60–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ferguson D.C., Dirikolu L., Hoenig M. 2009. Glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids and adrenolytic drugs. pp. 771–802. In: Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 9th ed. (Riviere, J.E. ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, Ames. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gibbs P.G., Potter G.D., Blake R.W., McMullan W.C. 1982. Milk production of quarter horse mares during 150 days of lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 496–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Greco D.S., Stabenfeldt G.H. 2007. Endocrinology. pp. 409–464. In: Textbook of Veterinary Physiology, 4th ed. (Cunningham, J.G., and Klein, B.G. eds.), Saunders, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hall S.J.G., Forsling M.L., Broom D.M. 1998. Stress responses of sheep to routine procedures: changes in plasma concentrations of vasopressin, oxytocin and cortisol. Vet. Rec. 142: 91–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harvey J.W., Pate M.G., Kivipelto J., Asquith R.L. 2005. Clinical biochemistry of pregnant and nursing mares. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 34: 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hura V., Novotny F., Valocky I. 2017. Changes of biochemical environment and body weight in healthy periparturient Lipizzan mares. Acta Vet. Brno 86: 67–74. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ivanov I., Shamanc H., Vujanac I., Dimitrijevic B. 2005. Metabolic profile of cows. Proceedings of the 4th symposium, Nutrition, reproduction and protection of bovine health- Etopathogenesis and diagnosis of the disorder.
- 18.Kida K. 2003. Relationships of metabolic profiles to milk production and feeding in dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 65: 671–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krajnicakova M., Kovac G., Kostecky M., Valocky I., Maracek I., Šutiakova I., Lenhardt L. 2003. Selected clinical-biochemical parameters. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 47: 177–182. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Minjidgorj N., Baldorj O., Austbø D. 2012. Chemical composition of Mongolian mare milk. Acta Agric. Scand. Anim. Sci. 62: 66–72. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Minton J.E., Apple J.K., Parsons K.M., Blecha F. 1995. Stress-associated concentrations of plasma cortisol cannot account for reduced lymphocyte function and changes in serum enzymes in lambs exposed to restraint and isolation stress. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 812–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miraglia N., Salimei E., Fantuz F. 2020. Equine milk production and valorization of marginal areas—a review. Animals (Basel) 10: 353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moolchandani A., Sareen M., Vaishnav J. 2008. Influence of restraint and isolation stress on plasma cortisol in male Karakul sheep. Vet. Arh. 78: 357–362. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nakano T., Bat-Oyun T., Shinoda M. 2020. Responses of palatable plants to climate and grazing in semi-arid grasslands of Mongolia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oftedal O.T. 2000. Use of maternal reserves as a lactation strategy in large mammals. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59: 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Salimei E., Fantuz F. 2013. Horse and donkey milk. pp. 594–613. In: Milk and Dairy Products in Human Nutrition: Production, Composition and Health (Park, Y.W., and Haenlein, G.F.W. eds.), Wiley & Sons, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Santos A.S., Silvestre A.M. 2008. A study of Lusitano mare lactation curve with Wood’s model. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 760–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Silva M.O., Ribeiro J.D.F., Dantas W.M.F., Ribeiro B.M., Ermita P.A.N., Monteiro L.C., Costa C.M., Silva G.M.M., Alves S.R., Avanza M.F.B., Santos P.V.M., Manso F.H.C. 2019. Biochemical profile of Mangalarga Marchador mares during the last third of pregnancy, foaling and lactation. Cienc. Rural 49: 11. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Snoj T., Jenko Z., Cebulj-Kadunc N. 2014. Fluctuations of serum cortisol, insulin and non-esterified fatty acid concentrations in growing ewes over the year. Ir. Vet. J. 67: 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vijayakumar M., Park J.H., Ki K.S., Lim D.H., Kim S.B., Park S.M., Jeong H.Y., Park B.Y., Kim T.I. 2017. The effect of lactation number, stage, length, and milking frequency on milk yield in Korean Holstein dairy cows using automatic milking system. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 1093–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yates D.T., Ross T.T., Hallford D.M., Yates L.J., Wesley R.L. 2010. Technical note: comparison of salivary and serum cortisol concentrations after adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge in ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 88: 599–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



