Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Sep 13;181(11):1544. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5417

Errors in Figure 2 and eTable 3 in the Supplement

PMCID: PMC8438616  PMID: 34515739

In the Original Investigation titled “Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes,”1 published June 28, 2021, and in August print, there were numeric errors in Figure 2 in the main article and eTable 3 in the online Supplement. In both places, the values for cardiovascular analyses for “Yes” given as “−3.59 (−6.14 to −0.89)” and “0.85 (0.75-0.97)” should have been “−9.22 (−13.50 to −6.16)” and “0.75 (0.67-0.84).” The values for cardiovascular analyses for “No” given as “−4.95 (−6.90 to −3.31)” and “0.81 (0.75-0.88)” should have been “−3.23 (−5.25 to −1.29)” and “0.85 (0.76 to 0.94).” This article has been corrected online.

Reference

  • 1.Xie Y, Bowe B, Gibson AK, McGill JB, Maddukuri G, Al-Aly Z. Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1043-1053. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES