Skip to main content
Conservation Physiology logoLink to Conservation Physiology
. 2021 Sep 14;9(1):coab078. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coab078

Urofaecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) chick populations experiencing different levels of human disturbance

Juan Scheun 1,2,3,, Rebecca J Miller 4, Andre Ganswindt 2, Lauren J Waller 4,5, Lorien Pichegru 6, Richard B Sherley 7,, Gavin W Maneveldt 4
Editor: John Narayan
PMCID: PMC8439262  PMID: 34532057

Abstract

Despite the importance of ecotourism in species conservation, little is known about the industry’s effects on wildlife. In South Africa, some African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) colonies have become tourist attractions. The species is globally endangered, with population sizes decreasing over the past 40 years. As African penguin chicks are altricial and unable to move away from anthropogenic stressors, it is important to evaluate the effect of tourist activities on baseline glucocorticoid levels as a measure of potential disturbance. Chicks at three study sites within two breeding colonies (Robben Island, Stony Point), with varying levels of exposure to tourism (low/moderate/high) were monitored. Urofaecal samples were collected to determine urofaecal glucocorticoid metabolite (ufGCM) concentrations as an indication of baseline stress physiology. Morphometric measurements were taken to compare body condition between sites. Penguin chicks experiencing low, infrequent human presence had significantly higher mean (± standard deviation) ufGCM levels [1.34 ± 1.70 μg/g dry weight (DW)] compared to chicks experiencing both medium (0.50 ± 0.40 μg/g DW, P = 0.001) and high levels of human presence (0.57 ± 0.47 μg/g DW, P = 0.003). There was no difference in chick body condition across sites. These results suggest that exposure to frequent human activity may induce habituation/desensitization in African penguin chicks. Acute, infrequent human presence was likely an important driver for comparatively higher ufGCM levels in chicks, though several other environmental stressors may also play an important role in driving adrenocortical activity. Nevertheless, as unhabituated chicks experiencing infrequent anthropogenic presence showed significantly higher ufGCM levels, managers and legislation should attempt to minimize all forms of activity around important breeding colonies that are not already exposed to regular tourism. Although the results of this study are crucial for developing enhanced conservation and management protocols, additional research on the long-term effect of anthropogenic activities on African penguin physiology is required.

Keywords: stress physiology, glucocorticoids, ecotourism, chicks, body condition, African penguins

Introduction

Globally, ecotourism is often hailed as a crucial tool for species conservation. It raises revenue through the non-consumptive use of wildlife (Pegas and Castley, 2014; Shannon et al., 2017; Steven et al., 2013) and awareness of environmental issues (Emerton et al., 2006). However, as the industry continues to grow, the expansion of tourist activities into natural, unaltered areas often results in largescale habitat degradation and loss, placing additional pressure on local biodiversity (Rehnus et al. 2014). As a result, wildlife species have to respond (behaviourally/physiologically) not only to predictable environmental change, such as seasonal climate change and resource availability, but also to unpredictable human activities within their immediate surroundings (Gaynor et al., 2018). The activation of anti-predator behaviours in response to human activities and natural predators can have direct fitness costs to a population (Amo et al., 2006), so behavioural observations are often collected to determine the cost of human activities to wildlife populations (Bateman and Fleming, 2017; Lowry et al., 2013; Thiel et al., 2008). However, wildlife populations may have little to no observable behavioural reaction in response to human activities, but still produce a physiological response if those activities are perceived as stressors (Ellenberg et al., 2006). Therefore, monitoring the stress physiology of a species directly is a more appropriate way to assess the impact of human activities on wildlife.

Glucocorticoid (GC) levels are generally accepted as a robust proxy of the physiological stress experienced by wildlife populations (Wikelski and Cooke, 2006). Individuals encountering environmental challenge will increase their GC secretion as an adaptive response in order to restore homeostasis (Busch and Hayward, 2009; Romero, 2002). However, the chronic increase of GC concentrations can result in (i) elevated baseline GC levels and (ii) several deleterious effects including immune and reproductive suppression, as well as metabolic alteration (Busch and Hayward, 2009; Webster Marketon and Glaser, 2008; Whirledge and Cidlowski, 2010). Where an animal is unable to cope with environmental challenges, an increase in baseline GC levels will reallocate resources from other activities, such as reproduction and body maintenance. This process, known as the ‘Cort-Fitness Hypothesis’, may result in reduced fitness (Bonier et al., 2009a; Bonier et al., 2009b). However, the support for the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis is not universal and highly context specific, with life history stage being an important determinant (Bonier et al., 2009b; Vitousek et al., 2019). As a result of the important role of sustaining baseline GC levels in maintaining individual and population health and fitness, it is imperative that research be conducted to assess baseline GC levels in wildlife populations facing anthropogenic stressors and how these baseline GC levels might change in response to these stressors.

Non-invasive endocrine monitoring, via the collection and analyses of faeces and urine, provides an ideal method for GC quantification in wild animals above the traditionally used blood collection and analysis (Behringer and Deschner, 2017; Keay et al., 2006). First, non-invasive monitoring techniques minimize the need for prolonged human–animal interaction, thus minimizing any additional potential stress-related feedback (Romero and Reed, 2005), while providing a method that ensures easy, long-term sample collection and analysis (Kersey and Dehnhard, 2014). Secondly, faecal and urine hormone metabolite values are less affected by episodic fluctuations of hormone secretions, as circulating hormone levels within the bloodstream accumulate within the faeces and urine over an extended period of time (McEwen and Wingfield, 2003). Several studies have implemented this method to monitor the stress physiology of penguin species in response to tourist activities in particular, including little penguin (Eudyptula minor; Chiew et al., 2019), gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua; Lynch et al., 2019) and African penguin (Spheniscus demersus; Scheun et al., 2020). However, such research has focused largely on the stress physiology of adults within the captive environment, with little to no consideration for penguin chicks, or for the determination of baseline GC levels. As penguin chicks are altricial and thus unable to alleviate any stress experienced by escaping the immediate area, reoccurring stressors may result in chronically elevated baseline GC concentrations (Walker et al., 2005). Such exposure to elevated GC levels has been shown to result in physiological and behavioural change, as well as increased susceptibility to future stressors (Auperin et al., 2008; Kaufman et al., 2007; Teicher et al., 2003). Monitoring adrenocortical activity in penguin chicks in response to tourism activity has only been done in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus), albeit through the collection and analysis of blood samples (Walker et al., 2005); newly hatched Magellanic chicks had a significantly higher adrenocortical response to visitation than their control counterparts. However, such a response was not fixed and the physiological response changed as chicks matured (Walker et al., 2005). As a result of the limited research, as well as a possible change in response to tourism as chicks mature, additional research on the topic is needed to determine the physiological effect that ecotourism can have on penguin chicks.

The African penguin is a species endemic to the coastline and islands of southern Africa (Shelton et al., 1984). Marine predators, like the African penguin, are important drivers of trophic stability (Heithaus et al., 2008), while being robust sentinels of habitat quality (Boersma, 2008). As such, conservation efforts of all penguin species are of utmost importance (Ropert-Coudert et al., 2019). Although once abundant throughout its natural range, population sizes have decreased by 72% from 63 000 to ~ 17 000 breeding pairs in the 40 years between 1979 and 2019 (Sherley et al., 2020). As a result, the species is classified as Endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (Birdlife International, 2020). Factors underlying the decline are largely human-driven and include pollution, habitat degradation, overfishing of preferred prey types, disease and climate change (Crawford et al., 2000; Crawford et al., 2011; Frost et al., 1976; Sherley et al., 2017). In addition to this, African penguins face direct contact with humans, especially through tourism activities. There is currently limited information available on the possible effect of such interactions. The only other study to look at the effect of anthropogenic activities on African penguins at different breeding localities (Pichegru et al., 2016) focused on the behavioural response of adults, which could move away from possible stressors. Additionally, that study lacked the inclusion of any physiological markers of stress. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship of human presence and urofaecal glucocorticoid metabolite (ufGCM) concentrations, as a measure of baseline GC levels, in African penguin chicks. We implemented non-invasive endocrine monitoring at three field sites with varying tourist pressure: two sites at a colony frequently visited by tourists (Stony Point), but contrasting in pressure levels (i.e. medium and high), and one site on an island where human pressure was low (Robben Island), both in the Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Material and methods

Study site and animals

The study was conducted between July and October 2017 with the approval of the University of the Western Cape (AR17/5/1) and the University of Exeter (2017/1594) ethics committees.

Stony Point

The Stony Point African penguin colony (34.3741° S, 18.8917° E) is located next to a residential area in Betty’s Bay, South Africa. The site was first colonized by the African penguin in 1982, becoming one of the largest breeding colonies in South Africa (Sherley et al., 2020; Underhill et al., 2006). The colony is a popular ecotourist attraction, with an average of 75 000 visitors annually (CapeNature, unpubl. data). Although the colony is not directly accessible to humans, visitors can come into close proximity (1–2 m) to the African penguins, including their nest sites, via a fenced boardwalk (defined as the disturbed study site and termed ‘SPH’). As a result, the level of anthropogenic presence at SPH is defined as frequent and high. A small section of the same colony is shielded from tourists and is only accessible to reserve staff and researchers (termed ‘SPM’). The presence of noise pollution from adjacent human activities (boat traffic, residential properties, tourist activities, etc.) does, however, result in the population experiencing frequent human disturbance, though less than at SPH. As such, SPM is defined as experiencing a medium level of anthropogenic presence. CapeNature (Conservation Authority for the province) conservation and research staff enter both the SPH and SPM breeding sites every 2–7 days for management and data collection purposes. For this study, chicks were monitored at both sites.

Robben Island

Similar to the Stony Point colony, the African penguin colony at Robben Island (33.8076° S, 18.3712° E) in Table Bay, South Africa, was recolonized in 1983 after an ~180-year absence of the species at the study site (Crawford et al., 2006). In total, 320 000 tourists travel to the island annually to visit several historical landmarks (Cape Town Tourism, 2019). However, the main penguin breeding areas are off-limits to visitors, with 1 nautical mile management zone around the island, which limits boat traffic in the vicinity. Similar to Stony Point, conservation and research staff enter some parts of the penguin colony every 2–7 days to collect data on breeding success and for other management purposes (e.g. Sherley et al., 2014a). As such, the penguin populations here experience a lower level of anthropogenic presence than those at Stony Point. For this study, to limit additional disturbance, data were collected from chicks in the areas regularly visited by conservation and research staff (termed ‘RIL’).

Urofaecal collection

In birds, both urine and faeces are excreted in unison through the cloaca and termed as urofaeces (Klasing, 2005; Scheun et al., 2021). Since it appears quite difficult to reliably separate the two matrices without cross-contamination (Scheun et al. 2020), the entire sample was collected for analysis. During the collection period, researchers collected a single sample from each chick at the respective study sites. Samples were collected from 14 July to 10 October 2017 (Table 1) during routine chick body condition assessments, thus minimizing the need for additional human–chick interaction. During the assessment, chicks were held above a clean plastic container and all excreted urofaeces was collected, before being transferred into pre-labelled collection tubes. All samples were frozen at −4°C shortly after collection and subsequently transported on dry ice to the Endocrine Research Laboratory, University of Pretoria, South Africa, for hormone analysis.

Table 1. The sample collection dates for each study site.

Study site Sample collection dates (2017)
RIL 9 August, 17 August, 18 September, 10 October
SPH 17 July, 3 August, 21 August
SPM 14 July, 3 August, 21 August

Chick condition index and chick grouping

During handling, researchers used a spring scale to determine individual chick mass (±10 g) and a vernier calliper to measure total head length (±1.0 mm) from the tip of the bill to the back of the skull (Lubbe et al., 2014). For each individual the observed mass Inline graphic and total head length (Inline graphic) measurements were used to calculate the chick body condition index (CCI) using the BCI4 modified Veen index method following Lubbe et al. (2014):

graphic file with name M3.gif

Here the constants for Inline graphic and Inline graphic were derived from the intercept and slope coefficients of 0.95 (Inline graphic) and 0.05 (Inline graphic) quantile regression fits between total head length and mass from 125 chicks that all fledged on Robben Island in 2004 (Lubbe et al., 2014). The condition of an individual chick is described as the proportion of the distance between the upper and lower quantiles for a chick of a given total head length. The result is a relative index appropriate for calculating the average condition of a group of chicks at a given time, or for comparisons between colonies. Chicks with Inline graphic have a body condition between the 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles at Robben Island in 2004, Inline graphic describes the median body condition in the 2004 cohort, and chicks with Inline graphic have a reduced probability of surviving to fledging (Lubbe et al., 2014; Morten et al., 2017).

Urofaecal steroid extraction

The collected urofaecal samples were lyophilized, pulverized and sieved through a thin mesh to remove undigested materials (Fieß et al., 1999). Subsequently, 0.050–0.055 g of urofaecal powder was extracted with 1.5-ml of 80% ethanol by vortexing for 15 minutes at room temperature. Following centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1500 g, the supernatant was decanted into microcentrifuge tubes and stored at −20°C until further analysis (Ganswindt et al., 2002).

Steroid analysis

Urofaecal extracts were analysed with an 11-hydroxyaetiocholanolone assay previously established for the African penguin (Anfossi et al., 2014; Ozella et al., 2015). Here, gut passage time and delay to peak ufGCM levels following a stressor was determined to be 7–10 hours (Anfossi et al., 2014; Ozella et al., 2015); thus, the handling of African penguin chicks in order to collect samples would have no influence on the observed ufGCM levels. Details of the utilized assay, including antibody cross-reactivities, are given by Quillfeldt and Möstl (2003). The sensitivity of the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was 9 ng/g dry weight (DW). The intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation, determined by repeated measurements of high- and low-value quality controls, were 6.33% and 6.64%, as well as 5.10% and 7.71%, respectively. Serial dilutions of extracted samples gave a displacement curve that was parallel to the respective standard curve (relative variation in the slope of the trend lines, < 5%).

Data analysis

In total, 105 urofaecal samples were collected during the study period (SPH = 37, SPM = 43; RIL = 25). Data exploration was conducted following the protocols described by Zuur et al. (2010). The assumption of normally distributed data were checked by examining probability plots and conducting a Shapiro–Wilk test for the ufGCM (W = 0.48, P < 0.001) and CCI data (W = 0.995, P = 0.957). As the ufGCM data were not normally distributed, data were log10 transformed to meet the normality assumption. In order to determine whether CCI and varying levels of anthropogenic pressure (low/medium/high) were significantly related to ufGCM levels in African penguin chicks, a general linear model (GLM) was performed with both CCI and anthropogenic pressure as explanatory variables. Only anthropogenic pressure was significantly related to ufGCM levels in this model (see results below). To support the findings of the GLM, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if a difference in ufGCM concentration existed between sites (according to the Marginality rule; Crawley, 2014). Subsequently, a post hoc Tukey Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was performed. Finally, we conducted an ANOVA to determine whether CCI differed between the different study sites. All data and graphical analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2019). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation and were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

The GLM analysis indicated that anthropogenic pressure, and not CCI, was significantly related to ufGCM concentrations in African penguin chicks (R2 = 0.166, F(3,101) = 7.919, P < 0.001; Table 2). The ANOVA analysis conducted in line with the marginality rule supported the GLM results, indicating that differences in anthropogenic pressure was a significant driver of ufGCM levels (F(2,102) = 11.4, P < 0.001). The resulting Tukey HSD post hoc test showed that chicks from the RIL site (1.34 ± 1.70 μg/g DW) had significantly higher ufGCM levels compared to chicks from both the SPM (0.50 ± 0.40 μg/g DW, P = 0.001) and SPH (0.57 ± 0.47 μg/g DW; P = 0.003, Fig. 1) sites; there was no significant difference in ufGCM levels between SPM and SPH sites (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in CCI across the three sites (F(2,102) = 0.947, P = 0.391).

Table 2. The coefficient estimates, standard errors (SE), t-values, P-values and 95% confidence intervals of all predictor variables in the generalized linear model for log10 ufGCM concentrations in African penguins at the three study sites.

Coefficient estimate SE t-value P-value Confidence intervals
2.5% 97.5%
Intercept −0.298 0.071 −4.212 < 0.001 −0.438 −0.158
CCI −0.094 0.096 −0.983 0.327 −0.286 0.097
Pressure: RIL 0.303 0.091 3.308 0.001 0.121 0.484
Pressure: SPM −0.130 0.080 −1.627 0.107 −0.288 0.028

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Boxplot (median, 25% percentile, 75% percentile) of ufGCM concentrations (μg/g DW) at each of the three study sections: Robben Island low disturbance (RIL), Stoney Point medium disturbance (SPM) and Stoney Point high disturbance (SPH). Significance between groups is indicated by *.

Discussion

This is the first study quantifying ufGCM as a proxy of the baseline stress physiology of African penguin chicks experiencing different levels of anthropogenic pressure. Our results showed that chicks at Robben Island, experiencing low levels of human pressure, had significantly higher baseline ufGCM levels than their counterparts at Stony Point experiencing medium or high (but regular) levels of human pressure. This is in contrast to several studies on avian species that have shown low GC concentrations in areas with limited to no human presence, including in the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus, Thiel et al., 2005), the American kestrel (Falco sparverius, Strasser and Heath, 2013) and the yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes, Ellenberg et al., 2007).

Frequent exposure to human activities can lead to a decrease in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responsiveness and thus low baseline GC levels (Kleist et al., 2018; Strasser and Heath, 2013), which could account for the findings in this study. A decrease in adrenocortical activity may result from habituation, desensitization, exhaustion and/or life history stage (Cyr and Romero, 2009). Chiew et al., (2019) showed that a change in visitor distance had no effect on the stress physiology of little penguins in captivity, likely due to habituation. Although only assessed behaviourally, African penguins have been shown to be more tolerant of human approach in colonies experiencing high levels of visitor exposure (Pichegru et al., 2016). Such tolerance and habituation could potentially lead to lower baseline ufGCM levels; however, it is still not known which behavioural indices can be linked to stress physiology in this species. Additionally, although an organism may perceive the presence of humans as a threat, chronic exposure can result in the desensitization of adrenocorticotropic hormone responsiveness, and thus the reduction of the resultant stress response mechanism and baseline GC levels (Aguilera, 1994). The chronic hyperactivation of the HPA axis in response to a repeated threat can also lead to individual exhaustion and a lower baseline ufGCM level (Selye, 1946). Finally, season or life history stage can be an important parameter in defining the baseline stress physiology and response of an organism to stressors (Bonier et al., 2009b; Vitousek et al., 2018).

Any one or all of the factors discussed above may have contributed to the lower baseline ufGCM levels observed in the African penguin chicks at Stony Point experiencing medium to high levels of anthropogenic activity. It must be noted that although low GC levels are often perceived as ideal in wildlife populations, suppression (desensitization/exhaustion/habituation) of the HPA axis can lead to various deleterious effects on individual survivability. Firstly, as GCs are important drivers of energy mobility, HPA suppression may lead to the inability of an individual to meet energy requirements, which directly influences growth and development (MacDougall-Shackleton et al., 2019; Schreck, 1993). Additionally, a change in HPA function can lead to alterations in animal ecology, including feeding and mating behaviour, as well as increased predation risk (Busch and Hayward, 2009; Goutte et al., 2011). Further long-term research is required, monitoring several parameters in birds from newly hatched chicks until adulthood, to determine which of the four parameters discussed above could be responsible for the difference in baseline ufGCM levels observed between study populations. Although human presence is a factor that likely drives adrenocortical activity in African penguin chicks, several additional factors might play an important role in this regard and should be studied in future research. Collecting such information will assist in determining the possible long-term effects this may have on chick survival and population demography.

In contrast, chicks from Robben Island that experienced little to no human presence had significantly higher ufGCM levels than those from Stony Point that experienced frequent medium to high levels of human presence. Although close tourist proximity to penguins at the RIL site is not possible due to the colony location, anthropogenic factors may still be responsible for elevated baseline ufGCM concentrations in the unhabituated African penguin chicks at the site. Similarly, Berger et al. (2007) showed that younger, unhabituated animals have significantly higher baseline GC levels in areas with novel or occasional stressors. Infrequent, distant boat traffic, visitor presence on the island or activities by researchers may be sufficient enough to lead to higher adrenocortical activity and an elevated ufGCM baseline. For example, a human moving to within ~150 m of a nesting site was enough to activate a physiological stress response in unhabituated Humboldt penguins (Ellenberg et al., 2006). Noise has also been shown to activate a behavioural and physiological stress response in several marine and terrestrial birds, including greater sage-grouse (Centrocerus urophasianus, Blickley et al., 2012) and crested tern (Sterna bergii, Brown, 1990). It should be noted that although elevated baseline ufGCM levels can lead to a decrease in fitness according to the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis, several studies have shown that elevated GC baseline levels can be advantageous. Specifically, such elevation can lead to enhanced post-fledgling survival, in contrast to the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis, through increased locomotor activity and foraging (Rivers et al., 2012). The results of this study found no difference in CCI levels between populations, suggesting that baseline GC levels were not responsible for a decrease in body condition. Furthermore, the relationship between baseline GC levels and fitness depends on the life history stage (breeding/migration, etc.) of a species and should be taken into consideration when monitoring baseline GC levels (Bonier et al., 2009b; Vitousek et al., 2018; Vitousek et al., 2019). Additional research on the RIL population is required to establish (i) potential drivers of adrenocortical activity, as well as (ii) the effect of elevated baseline GC concentrations on African penguin chick fitness and long-term survival. Furthermore, although human activity at the area of medium disturbance (SPM) does not involve direct visitor pressure (e.g. tourists), frequent, indirect pressure such as boat traffic and chronic urban noise could similarly have led to chick habituation/desensitization and to a decrease in the hyperactivation of the HPA axis. This suggestion, however, needs additional research to confirm.

Aside from direct human activity, several other factors might be responsible for the difference in baseline ufGCM levels of chicks from the two islands. The Robben Island penguin colony has been shown to be impacted by food availability (Campbell et al., 2019), with adult and juvenile survival declining along with prey availability (Sherley et al., 2014b, 2017). A decrease in resource availability and intake can lead to altered behaviour, as well as elevated energy expenditure and physiological stress (Bauer et al., 2011, Cote et al., 2010, Fokidis et al.,, 2012). An inability of the Robben Island African penguin adults to meet the energy requirements of their growing chicks might have caused HPA axis hyperactivation. However, we found no significant difference in CCI between chicks of the three different study sites, even though CCI is responsive to food availability (Campbell et al., 2019). As such, food intake might not be a primary driver of GC production in this study, but this requires further research to confirm. Moreover, other factors not monitored during this study, such as differences in the presence of naturally occurring predators (Scheuerlein et al., 2001; Sheriff et al., 2011), pollution (Peakall et al., 1981) and extreme weather events (Boersma and Rebstock 2014) can also be important drivers of the physiological stress response and could have been responsible for the varied ufGCM levels observed. Since the nesting habitat at the two sites is different, this could also have resulted in different levels of exposure to extreme weather events. However, additional research is required to determine which, if any, of the above-mentioned factors are important drivers of African penguin chick adrenocortical activity.

Conclusion

This study monitored baseline ufGCM concentrations of African penguin chicks at sites with various levels of human disturbance. The results show that ufGCM concentrations differ between sites. Habituation, desensitization, exhaustion and/or life history stage may be important drivers of African penguin chick physiology in the face of human activity, even when stressors occur at comparatively low frequencies. Managers need to be mindful of minimizing activity at colonies with high human activity in the event that habituation is masking exhaustion, for example. However, future research should consider additional environmental factors, both anthropogenic and natural, as potential drivers of stress physiology in African penguin chicks. In addition to this, the effect of site-specific factors on adrenocortical activity should be considered. For ongoing conservation purposes, it would also be useful to monitor the stress responses of various age classes in this species, as stress physiology may change during development. Finally, as unhabituated chicks showed significantly elevated ufGCM levels compared to chicks experiencing medium and high levels of anthropogenic presence, managers and legislation should attempt to minimize all forms of activity (including tourism and construction) around important breeding colonies that are not regularly exposed to tourism.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology at the University of the Western Cape, the South African National Research Foundation (to G.W.M.) and the Earthwatch Institute (to R.B.S.).

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Peter Barham, Barbara Barham, Corlie Hugo, Cuan McGeorge, the late Marcelo October, Nola Parsons, Albert Snyman, Martine Viljoen and Earthwatch Institute volunteers for assisting R.J.M. with data collection. CapeNature, Robben Island Museum and the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment are thanked for the permission to undertake the research.

References

  1. Aguilera  G (1994) Regulation of pituitary ACTH secretion during chronic stress. Front Neuroendocrinol  15: 321–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amo  L, López  P, Martín  J (2006) Nature-based tourism as a form of predation risk affects body condition and health state of Podarcis muralis lizards. Biol Conserv  131: 402–409. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anfossi  L, Ozella  L, Di Nardo  F, Giovannoli  C, Passini  C, Favaro  L, Pessani  D, Mostl  E, Baggiani  C (2014) A broad-selective enzyme immunoassay for non-invasive stress assessment in African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) held in captivity. Anal Meth  6: 8222–8231. [Google Scholar]
  4. Auperin  B, Geslin  M (2008) Plasma cortisol response to stress in juvenile rainbow trout is influenced by their life history during early development and by egg cortisol content. Gen Comp Endocrinol  158: 234 –239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateman  PW, Fleming  PA (2017) Are negative effects of tourist activities on wildlife over-reported? A review of assessment methods and empirical results. Biol Conserv  211: 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer  CM, Glassman  LW, Cyr  NE, Romero  LM (2011) Effects of predictable and unpredictable food restriction on the stress response in molting and non-molting European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Comp Biochem Physiol A  160: 390–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Behringer  V, Deschner  T (2017) Non-invasive monitoring of physiological markers in primates. Horm Behav  91: 3–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger  S, Wikelski  M, Romero  LM, Kalko  EKV, Rödl  T (2007) Behavioral and physiological adjustments to new predators in an endemic island species, the Galápagos marine iguana. Horm Behav  52: 653–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdlife International (2020) Spheniscus demersus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.  e.T22697810A157423361
  10. Blickley  JL, Word  KR, Krakauer  AH, Phillips  JL, Sells  SN, Taff  CC, Wingfield  JC, Patricelli  GL (2012) Experimental chronic noise is related to elevated fecal corticosteroid metabolites in lekking male greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). PLoS One  7: e50462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boersma  PD (2008) Penguins as marine sentinels. Bioscience  58: 597–607. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boersma  PD, Rebstock  GA (2014) Climate change increases reproductive failure in Magellanic penguins. PLoS One  9: e85602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonier  F, Martin  PR, Moore  IT, Wingfield  JC (2009a) Do baseline glucocorticoids predict fitness?  Trends Ecol Evol  24: 634–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonier  F, Moore  IT, Martin  PR, Robertson  RJ (2009b) The relationship between fitness and baseline glucocorticoids in a passerine bird. Gen Comp Endocrinol  163: 208–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown  AL (1990) Measuring the effect of aircraft noise on sea birds. Environ Int  16: 587–592. [Google Scholar]
  16. Busch  DS, Hayward  LS (2009) Stress in a conservation context: a discussion of glucocorticoid actions and how levels change with conservation-relevant variables. Biol Conserv  142: 2844–2853. [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell  KJ, Steinfurth  A, Underhill  LG, Coetzee  JC, Dyer  BM, Ludynia  K, Makhado  AB, Merkle  D, Rademan  J, Upfold  L  et al. (2019) Local forage fish abundance influences foraging effort and offspring condition in an endangered marine predator. J Appl Ecol  56: 1751–1760. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cape Town Tourism (2019) Future Forward 2018/2019 Annual Report. Cape Town, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiew  SJ, Butler  KL, Sherwen  SL, Coleman  GJ, Fanson  KV, Hemsworth  PH (2019) Effects of regulating visitor viewing proximity and the intensity of visitor behaviour on little penguin (Eudyptula minor) behaviour and welfare. Animals  9: 285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cote  J, Clobert  J, Montes Poloni  L, Haussy  C, Meylan  S (2010) Food deprivation modifies corticosterone-dependent behavioural shifts in the common lizard. Gen Comp Endocrinol  166: 142–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Crawford  R, Davis  S, Harding  R, Jackson  L, Leshoro  T, Meÿer  M, Randall  R, Underhill  L, Upfold  L, Van Dalsen  A (2000) Initial impact of the treasure oil spill on seabirds off western South Africa. S Afr J Mar Sci  22: 157–176. [Google Scholar]
  22. Crawford  RJ, Barham  PJ, Underhill  LG, Shannon  LJ, Coetzee  JC, Dyer  BM, Leshoro  TM, Upfold  L (2006) The influence of food availability on breeding success of African penguins Spheniscus demersus at Robben Island, South Africa. Biol Conserv  132: 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  23. Crawford  RJM, Altwegg  R, Barham  BJ, Barham  PJ, Durant  JM, Dyer  BM, Geldenhuys  D, Makhado  AB, Pichegru  L, Ryan  PG  et al. (2011) Collapse of South Africa's penguins in the early 21st century. Afr J Mar Sci  33: 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  24. Crawley  MJ (2014) An Introduction to R, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, USA [Google Scholar]
  25. Cyr  NE, Romero  LM (2009) Identifying hormonal habituation in field studies of stress. Gen Comp Endocrinol  161: 295–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellenberg  U, Mattern  T, Seddon  PJ, Jorquera  GL (2006) Physiological and reproductive consequences of human disturbance in Humboldt penguins: the need for species-specific visitor management. Biol Conserv  133: 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellenberg  U, Setiawan  AN, Cree  A, Houston  DM, Seddon  PJ (2007) Elevated hormonal stress response and reduced reproductive output in Yellow-eyed penguins exposed to unregulated tourism. Gen Comp Endocrinol  152: 54–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Emerton  L, Bishop  J, Thomas  L (2006) Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A Global Review of Challenges and Options. IUCN, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fieß  M, Heistermann  M, Hodges  JK (1999) Patterns of urinary and fecal steroid excretion during the ovarian cycle and pregnancy in the African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Gen Comp Endocrinol  115: 76–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fokidis  HB, des Roziers  MB, Sparr  R, Rogowski  C, Sweazea  K, Deviche  P (2012) Unpredictable food availability induces metabolic and hormonal changes independent of food intake in a sedentary songbird. J Exp Biol  215: 2920–2930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Frost  P, Siegfried  W, Cooper  J (1976) Conservation of the jackass penguin (Spheniscus demersus (L.)). Biol Conserv  9: 79–99. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ganswindt  A, Heistermann  M, Borragan  S, Hodges  J (2002) Assessment of testicular endocrine function in captive African elephants by measurement of urinary and faecal androgens. Zoo Biol  21: 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gaynor  KM, Hojnowski  CE, Carter  NH, Brashares  JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science  360: 1232–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Goutte  A, Clément-Chastel  C, Moe  B, Bech  C, Gabrielsen  GW, Chastel  O (2011) Experimentally reduced corticosterone release promotes early breeding in black-legged kittiwakes. J Exp Biol  214: 2005–2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heithaus  MR, Frid  A, Wirsing  AJ, Worm  B (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol Evol  23: 202–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaufman  D, Banerji  MA, Wirsing  AJ, Shorman  I, Smith  ELP, Coplan  JD, Rosenblum  LA, Kral  JG (2007) Early-life stress and the development of obesity and insulin resistance in juvenile bonnet macaques. Diabetes  56: 1382–1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Keay  JM, Singh  J, Gaunt  MC, Kaur  T (2006) Fecal glucocorticoids and their metabolites as indicators of stress in various mammalian species: a literature review. J Zoo Wildl Med  37: 234–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kersey  DC, Dehnhard  M (2014) The use of noninvasive and minimally invasive methods in endocrinology for threatened mammalian species conservation. Gen Comp Endocrinol  203: 296–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Klasing  KC (2005) Potential impact of nutritional strategy on noninvasive measurements of hormones in birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci  1046: 5–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kleist  NJ, Guralnick  RP, Cruz  A, Lowry  CA, Francis  CD (2018) Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community. Proc Natl Acad Sci  115: E648–E657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lowry  H, Lill  A, Wong  BBM (2013) Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biol Rev  88: 537–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lubbe  A, Underhill  L, Waller  L, Veen  J (2014) A condition index for African penguin Spheniscus demersus chicks. Afr J Mar Sci  36: 143–154. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch  MA, Youngflesh  C, Agha  NH, Ottinger  MA, Lynch  HJ (2019) Tourism and stress hormone measures in Gentoo Penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol  42: 1299–1306. [Google Scholar]
  44. MacDougall-Shackleton  SA, Bonier  F, Romero  LM, Moore  IT (2019) Glucocorticoids and “stress” are not synonymous. Integr Org Biol  1: obz017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. McEwen  BS, Wingfield  JC (2003) The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav  43: 2–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Morten  J, Parsons  N, Schwitzer  C, Holderied  M, Sherley  R (2017) Body condition as a quantitative tool to guide hand-rearing decisions in an endangered seabird. Anim Conserv  20: 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ozella  L, Anfossi  L, Di Nardo  F, Pessani  D (2015) Non-invasive monitoring of adrenocortical activity in captive African Penguin (Spheniscus demersus) by measuring faecal glucocorticoid metabolites. Gen Comp Endocrinol  224: 104–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Peakall  D, Tremblay  J, Kinter  W, Miller  D (1981) Endocrine dysfunction in seabirds caused by ingested oil. Environ Res  24: 6–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pegas  FV, Castley  JG (2014) Ecotourism as a conservation tool and its adoption by private protected areas in Brazil. J Sustain Tour  22: 604–625. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pichegru  L, Edwards  TB, Dilley  BJ, Flower  TP, Ryan  PG (2016) African penguin tolerance to humans depends on historical exposure at colony level. Bird Conserv Int  26: 307. [Google Scholar]
  51. Quillfeldt  P, Möstl  E (2003) Resource allocation in Wilson's storm-petrels Oceanites oceanicus determined by measurement of glucocorticoid excretion. Acta Ethologica  5: 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  52. R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  53. Rehnus  M, Wehrle  M, Palme  R (2014) Mountain hares Lepus timidus and tourism: stress events and reactions. J Appl Ecol  51: 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rivers  JW, Liebl  AL, Owen  JC, Martin  LB, Betts  MG (2012) Baseline corticosterone is positively related to juvenile survival in a migrant passerine bird. Funct Ecol  26: 1127–1134. [Google Scholar]
  55. Romero  LM (2002) Seasonal changes in plasma glucocorticoid concentrations in free-living vertebrates. Gen Comp Endocrinol  128: 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Romero  LM, Reed  JM (2005) Collecting baseline corticosterone samples in the field: is under 3 min good enough?  Comp Biochem Physiol A  140: 73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ropert-Coudert  Y, Chiaradia  A, Ainley  D, Barbosa  A, Boersma  PD, Brasso  R, Dewar  M, Ellenberg  U, García-Borboroglu  P, Emmerson  L  et al. (2019) Happy feet in a hostile world? The future of penguins depends on proactive management of current and expected threats. Front Mar Sci  6: 248. [Google Scholar]
  58. Scheuerlein  A, Van't Hof  T, Gwinner  E (2001) Predators as stressors? Physiological and reproductive consequences of predation risk in tropical stonechats (Saxicola torquata axillaris). Proc R Soc Lond B: Series B: Biol Sci  268: 1575–1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Scheun  J, Gulson  JA, Ganswindt  A (2020) Monitoring glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations as a proxy of environmental stress across important life-history stages in captive African penguins. Gen Comp Endocrinol  296: 113539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Scheun  J, Ludynia  K, Snyman  A, Ganswindt  A (2021) Non-invasive hormone monitoring as a robust method for determining adrenocortical activity in injured, emaciated and oil-contaminated African penguins undergoing rehabilitation. Gen Comp Endocrinol  303: 113703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schreck  CB (1993) Glucocorticoids: metabolism, growth, and development. In M  Schreibman, CG  Scanes, PKT  Pang, eds, The Endocrinology of Growth, Development, and Metabolism in Vertebrates. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 367–392. [Google Scholar]
  62. Selye  H (1946) The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. J Clin Endocrinol  6: 117–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shannon  G, Larson  CL, Reed  SE, Crooks  KR, Angeloni  LM (2017) Ecological consequences of ecotourism for wildlife populations and communities. In DT  Blumstein, B  Geffroy, DSM  Samia, E  Bessa, eds, Ecotourism’s Promise and Peril: A Biological Evaluation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 29–46. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shelton  P, Crawford  R, Cooper  J, Brooke  R (1984) Distribution, population size and conservation of the Jackass Penguin Spheniscus demersus. S Afr J Mar Sci  2: 217–257. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sheriff  MJ, Krebs  CJ, Boonstra  R (2011) From process to pattern: how fluctuating predation risk impacts the stress axis of snowshoe hares during the 10-year cycle. Oecologia  166: 593–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sherley  RB, Crawford  RJM, de  Blocq  AD, Dyer  BM, Geldenhuys  D, Hagen  C, Kemper  J, Makhado  AB, Pichegru  L, Tom  D  et al. (2020) The conservation status and population decline of the African penguin deconstructed in space and time. Ecol Evol  10: 8506–8516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sherley  RB, Ludynia  K, Dyer  BM, Lamont  T, Makhado  AB, Roux  J-P, Scales  KL, Underhill  LG, Votier  SC (2017) Metapopulation tracking juvenile penguins reveals an ecosystem-wide ecological trap. Curr Biol  27: 563–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sherley  RB, Abadi  F, Ludynia  K, Barham  BJ, Clark  AE, Altwegg  R (2014b) Age-specific survival and movement among major African Penguin Spheniscus demersus colonies. Ibis  156: 716–728. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sherley  RB, Barham  PJ, Barham  BJ, Crawford  RJM, Dyer  BM, Leshoro  TM, Makhado  AB, Upfold  L, Underhill  LG (2014a) Growth and decline of a penguin colony and the influence on nesting density and reproductive success. Popul Ecol  56: 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  70. Steven  R, Castley  JG, Buckley  R (2013) Tourism revenue as a conservation tool for threatened birds in protected areas. PLoS One  8: e62598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Strasser  EH, Heath  JA (2013) Reproductive failure of a human-tolerant species, the American kestrel, is associated with stress and human disturbance. J Appl Ecol  50: 912–919. [Google Scholar]
  72. Teicher  MH, Andersen  SL, Polcari  A, Anderson  CM, Navalta  CP, Kim  DM (2003) The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev  27: 33–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Thiel  D, Jenni-Eiermann  S, Braunisch  V, Palme  R, Jenni  L (2008) Ski tourism affects habitat use and evokes a physiological stress response in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: a new methodological approach. J Appl Ecol  45: 845–853. [Google Scholar]
  74. Thiel  D, Jenni-Eiermann  S, Palme  R (2005) Measuring corticosterone metabolites in droppings of capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus). Ann N Y Acad Sci  1046: 96–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Underhill  L, Crawford  R, Wolfaardt  A, Whittington  P, Dyer  B, Leshoro  T, Ruthenberg  M, Upfold  L, Visagie  J (2006) Regionally coherent trends in colonies of African penguins Spheniscus demersus in the Western Cape, South Africa, 1987–2005. Afr J Mar Sci  28: 697–704. [Google Scholar]
  76. Vitousek  MN, Johnson  MA, Downs  CJ, Miller  ET, Martin  LB, Francis  CD, Donald  JW, Fuxjager  MJ, Goymann  W, Hau  M  et al. (2019) Macroevolutionary patterning in glucocorticoids suggests different selective pressures shape baseline and stress-induced levels. Am Nat  193: 866–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vitousek  MN, Taff  CC, Hallinger  KK, Zimmer  C, Winkler  DW (2018) Hormones and fitness: evidence for trade-offs in glucocorticoid regulation across contexts. Front Ecol Evol  6: 42. [Google Scholar]
  78. Walker  BG, Dee Boersma  P, Wingfield  JC (2005) Physiological and behavioral differences in Magellanic penguin chicks in undisturbed and tourist-visited locations of a colony. Conserv Biol  19: 1571–1577. [Google Scholar]
  79. Webster Marketon  JI, Glaser  R (2008) Stress hormones and immune function. Cell Immunol  252: 16–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Whirledge  S, Cidlowski  JA (2010) Glucocorticoids, stress, and fertility. Minerva Endocrinol  35: 109–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wikelski  M, Cooke  SJ (2006) Conservation physiology. Trends Ecol Evol  21: 38–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zuur  AF, Ieno  EN, Elphick  CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol  1: 3–14. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Conservation Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES