Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Sep 14;16(9):e0257227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257227

Association between plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity and in-hospital outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

Ryota Sato 1, Keitaro Akita 1, Takenori Ikoma 1, Keisuke Iguchi 1, Takayo Murase 2, Takashi Nakamura 2, Seigo Akari 2, Satoshi Mogi 1, Yoshihisa Naruse 1, Hayato Ohtani 1, Yuichiro Maekawa 1,*
Editor: Zhejun Cai3
PMCID: PMC8439489  PMID: 34520495

Abstract

Objectives

Reactive oxygen species generated by xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) are associated with the progression of atherosclerosis. However, changes in plasma XOR (pXOR) activity after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.

Methods

Herein, we compared the change in the pXOR activity in patients undergoing PCI with that in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and further evaluated the relation between changes in pXOR activity and in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing PCI. The pXOR activity of 80 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and 25 patients who underwent CAG during the hospitalization was analyzed daily. The percentage changes from baseline regulated time interval was evaluated.

Results

We found that although pXOR activity decreased after PCI, and remained low until discharge, no significant changes were observed in patients undergoing CAG. Furthermore, among the patients undergoing PCI, those who experienced in-hospital adverse events, had a higher percentage of pXOR reduction 3 days after PCI. There was no association between these changes and long-term events.

Conclusions

A significant change in pXOR activity was observed in patients undergoing PCI than in patients undergoing CAG, and there seems to be a correlation between the in-hospital outcomes and the percentage reduction from baseline in pXOR activity.

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress is one of the risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD), which affects the prognosis and reduces the survival time and quality of life of patients [13]. Characterized by an imbalance between the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the capacity of the intrinsic antioxidant defense system, it has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases [3]. Increased activity of xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is known to reportedly increase the production of both ROS and uric acid [4]. An increase in ROS production, results in oxidative stress-mediated myocardial and arterial vessel injury [5]. A technique for measuring plasma XOR (pXOR) activity was recently established, and several reports have been published regarding pXOR activity in patients with chronic heart failure and heart and renal diseases [6, 7] as well as in healthy populations [8, 9]. Although the association between single assessments of pXOR activity and cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders has been elucidated, changes in pXOR activity, obtained by repeated measurements, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable CAD, remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the daily pXOR activity in hospitalized patients with CAD before and after PCI and investigate the association between the changes in pXOR activity and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study design

This study was a prospective single-center study. The study protocol complied with the guidelines of the Institutional Ethics Committee, and all the participants provided written, informed consent for participation in the study, as well as publication of their data.

2.2 Participants

Participants were recruited from Hamamatsu University hospital between October 2017 and December 2020. Elective coronary angiography (CAG) was performed in patients with typical angina or suspected stable CAD whose clinical characteristics and results of noninvasive testing or significant stenosis observed on coronary computed tomography indicated a high likelihood of CAD. The exclusion criteria of CAG were as follows: 1) acute coronary syndrome, 2) receiving hemodialysis, 3) post coronary artery bypass graft or 4) left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. The indications for PCI in this study were as follows: 1) Patients in whom the perfusion zone of the coronary artery with significant stenosis (American Heart Association classification >75%) coincided with the area of ischemia demonstrated by noninvasive ischemia evaluation test or 2) Patients with moderate stenosis (50–75% stenosis) or multi-vessel lesions demonstrated by CAG and ischemia by fractional flow reserve (FFR), but with a vessel diameter that allows drug-eluting stent implantation. FFR evaluation was performed following procedures previously described [10]. The exclusion criteria of PCI included acute coronary syndrome, receiving hemodialysis or PCI failure. A total of 105 patients were enrolled of which 25 underwent elective CAG and 80 underwent PCI. Plasma XOR activity was measured daily in all the 105 subjects undergoing CAG or PCI over 3 days of hospitalization. All patients undergoing CAG or PCI were hospitalized for 3 nights unless more hospitalization days were required at the physician’s discretion. All patients had a follow-up evaluation at a clinical visit at 8 months. The percentage change in pXOR activity was defined as:

% change = {(pXOR activity after CAG or PCI–pXOR activity before CAG or PCI)/pXOR activity before CAG or PCI}×100, based on the time course of the plasma XOR activity during the hospitalization.

2.3 CAG and PCI procedures

We used a previously described procedure for PCI [11]. Patients were administered 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel or 3.75 mg prasugrel orally before the scheduled PCI. CAG was performed in all patients using a 5F catheter via a radial approach [12]. Conventional methods involving the use of a guiding catheter, a 0.014-inch guidewire, and a monorail balloon catheter were used for stent deployment. The type of drug-eluting stents used was at the operator’s discretion. After stent implantation, further balloon upsizing and/or higher inflation pressures were used. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were not used in this study.

2.4 Clinical assessments

Baseline characteristics of all patients were recorded. The presence of coronary risk factors, including smoking habits, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, a family history of premature CAD, defined as myocardial infarction (MI) or sudden death in a first relative, male younger than 55 years or female younger than 65 years; and concomitant medications including aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium antagonists, and XOR inhibitors, were reviewed [11]. Further, we investigated the incidence of in-hospital and long-term outcomes including all-cause death, periprocedural MI, cardiogenic shock, stroke, a new requirement for hemodialysis, a need for blood transfusion, and major bleeding. Periprocedural MI was defined according to an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [13]. Major bleeding was defined as the occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding [14]. A composite in-hospital adverse event was defined as the occurrence of all-cause death, periprocedural MI, stroke, and major bleeding.

2.5 Laboratory methods

2.5.1 Plasma XOR activity

Blood samples were collected in a blood collection tube coated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-2K kept at 4°C until centrifugation and centrifuged by 2,000 g at 4°C for 10 min to separate plasma. The pXOR activity was measured by liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC/TQMS) (Nexera HLC, SHIMADZU, Japan/QTRAP 4500, SCIEX) to detect [13C2, 15N2] uric acid using [13C2, 15N2] xanthine as a substrate as previously reported [1517].

2.5.2 Concentrations of hypoxanthine and xanthine

Blood samples were collected using a blood collection tube coated with PAX-gene DNA, kept at 4°C until centrifugation and centrifuged at 2,000 g at 4°C for 10 min to separate plasma. Plasma concentrations of hypoxanthine and xanthine were measured as previously reported [18]. In brief, plasma samples were added into methanol containing [13C2, 15N2] xanthine and [13C3, 15N3] hypoxanthine as internal standard and were centrifuged at 3,000 g at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant (40 μL) was diluted with 160 μL of distilled water and concentrations of hypoxanthine and xanthine measured using LC/TQMS.

2.5.3 Statistical analysis

Continuous data including pXOR activity, which are not normally distributed are presented as median and lower upper quartile. The other continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD if they are normally distributed. The normality of distribution of each variable was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk W test. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute values and percentages. For comparisons between CAG and PCI groups or between patients undergoing PCI with and without adverse events, the Mann–Whitney U-test (non-parametric), t-test (parametric) and Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test (categorical) were used as appropriate. Within-group comparisons of a percent reduction in pXOR activity from baseline at different time points were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the changes in pXOR activity between before and 3 days after PCI. The G Power computer program version 3.1.9.2 (Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany) [19] was used to calculate a priori sample size required for the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. It would be modeled at an effect size of 0.5 (medium), α level of 0.05 and power of 0.80, and a minimum of 50 participants would be required. All P values were 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant at a P value <0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 2.13.0). More precisely, it is a modified version of R commander (version 1.27) that was designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics.

3. Results

Our study population included 105 patients with CAD, of which 25 had undergone CAG and 80 had undergone PCI. Baseline characteristics of both groups of patients are shown in Table 1. The age, proportion of male, and BMI were similar between the CAG and PCI groups. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of the coronary risk factors including hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, and smoking between the both groups. Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were lower in patients undergoing PCI than in patients undergoing CAG. There were no significant differences in pXOR activity as well as in the levels of uric acid, xanthine, and hypoxanthine between the groups. As for the medication, the use of aspirin and prasugrel was higher in the PCI group than in the CAG group.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

Characteristics CAG (n = 25) PCI (n = 80) P value
Age, years, mean (SD) 73.5 (8.4) 70.2 (10.0) 0.140
Male, n (%) 19 (76.0) 59 (73.8) 1
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) 24.8 (3.6) 23.4 (3.9) 0.110
Hypertension, n (%) 21 (84.0) 53 (66.2) 0.131
DM, n (%) 14 (56.0) 37 (46.2) 0.493
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 17 (68.0) 46 (57.5) 0.484
CKD, n (%) 17 (68.0) 43 (53.8) 0.252
Smoking, n (%) 1 (4.0) 10 (12.5) 0.453
Family history of CAD, n (%) 0 (0.0) 3 (3.8) 1
Hyperuricemia, n (%) 5 (20.0) 11 (13.8) 0.525
Previous MI, n (%) 12 (48.0) 33 (41.2) 0.645
Previous CVD, n (%) 5 (20.0) 5 (6.2) 0.055
Previous PAD, n (%) 2 (8.0) 12 (15.0) 0.51
Previous AF/AFL, n (%) 2 (8.0) 10 (12.5) 0.727
Medications
Aspirin, n (%) 21 (84.0) 80 (100.0) 0.003
Clopidogrel, n (%) 3 (12.0) 21 (26.2) 0.178
Prasugrel, n (%) 10 (40.0) 58 (72.5) 0.004
ACE-inhibitor/ARBs, n (%) 18 (72.0) 45 (56.2) 0.242
β blockers, n (%) 16 (64.0) 54 (67.5) 0.81
Statin, n (%) 22 (88.0) 72 (90.0) 0.721
Ca channel blockers, n (%) 16 (64.0) 29 (36.2) 0.02
Diuretics, n (%) 3 (12.0) 14 (17.5) 0.757
XOR inhibitor, n (%) 3 (12.0) 11 (13.8) 0.664
Insulin, n (%) 4 (16.0) 10 (12.5) 0.737
Oral antidiabetic drugs, n (%) 7 (28.0) 22 (27.5) 1
DOAC, n (%) 2 (8.0) 8 (10.0) 1
Warfarin, n (%) 1 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 0.238
Echocardiography
LVEF (Teichholz) %, mean (SD) 60.7 (9.8) 53.3 (14.9) 0.155
LVDd, mm, mean (SD) 49.9 (4.8) 47.6 (6.4) 0.355
LVDs, mm, mean (SD) 33.3 (4.0) 34.4 (7.3) 0.703
Laboratory data
LDL-C, mg/dL, mean (SD) 88.8 (23.8) 73.5 (22.7) 0.005
HbA1c, %, mean (SD) 6.9 (0.99) 6.5 (1.0) 0.104
Uric acid, mg/dL, mean (SD) 5.5 (1.7) 5.6 (1.6) 0.63
XOR activity, pmol/h/ml plasma, median (IQR) 31.70 [7.59, 182.00] 44.65 [0.00, 738.00] 0.064
Xanthine, μM, median (IQR) 0.42 [0.25, 22.60] 0.64 [0.15, 17.30] 0.14
Hypoxanthine, μM, median (IQR) 3.58 [0.83, 15.60] 3.69 [0.70, 63.80] 0.633

Abbreviations: CAG, coronary angiography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; PAD, peripheral artery disease; AF/AFL, atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; XOR, xanthine oxidoreductase; DOAC, direct oral anti-coagulants; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVDd, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVDs, left ventricular end systolic diameter; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HbA1C, hemoglobin A1C; IQR, interquartile range.

3.1 Time course of plasma XOR activity

Plasma XOR activity decreased after PCI and remained low until the discharge of the patients. On the other hand, no significant change was observed in patients undergoing CAG. Fig 1 shows the percentage reduction in pXOR activity at each time point from baseline in patients undergoing CAG and PCI. Compared with CAG group, a significant decrease in the percent pXOR activity from baseline at day 1 and day 2 were observed in the PCI group.

Fig 1. Comparison of percent changes in plasma XOR activity from baseline at day 1, day 2 and day 3 during the hospitalization between CAG and PCI.

Fig 1

3.2 Association of the percentage reduction in plasma XOR activity with the in-hospital outcomes

Characteristics of the PCI procedure and details of the in-hospital outcomes are shown in Table 2. Patients who experienced adverse in-hospital outcomes had a longer total fluoroscopy time and procedure time, and larger volume of the contrast dose (Table 2). The incidence of periprocedural MI was higher in patients undergoing PCI with in-hospital adverse events than in patients without in-hospital adverse events (Table 2). The percentage reduction of pXOR activity at day 3 in patients undergoing PCI with in-hospital adverse events was higher than in patients without in-hospital adverse events (Fig 2).

Table 2. Details of the PCI procedure and in-hospital outcomes.

Characteristics PCI Without AE (n = 72) With AE (n = 8) P value
total (n = 80)
Approach site
TRI, n (%) 72 (90.0) 65 (90.3) 7(87.5) 0.587
TFI, n (%) 8 (10.0) 7 (9.7) 1 (12.5)
Sheath size
6Fr, n (%) 69 (86.3) 63 (87.5) 6 (75.0) 0.302
7Fr, n (%) 11 (13.7) 9 (12.5) 2 (25.0)
Total fluoroscopy time, min, mean (SD) 34.5 (25.7) 29.5 (16.5) 79.88 (46.76) <0.001
Procedure time, min, mean (SD) 99.0 (54.5) 89.2 (41.1) 188.12 (82.29) <0.001
Contrast dose, ml, mean (SD) 127.4 (56.3) 122.7 (53.3) 170.00 (71.86) 0.024
IABP use, n (%) 1 (1.4) 1 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 1
Rotablator use, n (%) 7(8.7) 6 (8.3) 1 (12.5) 0.536
Stent
PtCr-EES, n (%) 14 (17.5) 11 (15.3) 3 (37.5) 0.555
CoCr-EES, n (%) 37 (46.2) 33 (45.8) 4 (50.0)
R-ZES, n (%) 3 (3.7) 3 (4.2) 0 (0.0)
U-SES, n (%) 22 (27.5) 21 (29.2) 1 (12.5)
Others, n (%) 4 (5.0) 4 (5.6) 0 (0.0)
Number of diseased vessels
1VD, n (%) 56 (70.0) 52 (72.2) 4 (50.0) 0.287
2VD, n (%) 20 (25.0) 16 (22.2) 4 (50.0)
3VD, n (%) 4 (5.0) 4 (5.6) 0 (0.0)
Lesion site
LMT, n (%) 11 (13.7) 10 (13.9) 1 (12.5) 1
LAD, n (%) 44 (55.0) 39 (54.2) 5 (62.5)
LCX, n (%) 12 (15.0) 11 (15.3) 1 (12.5)
RCA, n (%) 13 (16.2) 12 (16.7) 1 (12.5)
In-hospital outcomes
Deaths, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1
MI, n (%) 6 (7.5) 0 (0.0) 6 (75.0) <0.001
Stroke, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1
Shock, n (%) 1 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 0.1
Hemodialysis, n (%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1
Blood transfusion, n (%) 1 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 0.1
Major bleeding, n (%) 1 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (12.5) 0.1

Abbreviations: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; AE, adverse events; TRI, transradial intervention; TFI, transfemoral intervention; SD, standard deviation; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; EES, everolimus-eluting stent; ZES, zotarolimus-eluting stent; SES, sirolimus-eluting stent; VD, vessel disease; LMT, left main trunk; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery; MI, myocardial infarction.

Fig 2. Percent changes in plasma XOR activity day 1, day 2 and day 3 from baseline in patients with and without composite in-hospital adverse events.

Fig 2

3.3 Long-term outcomes

The mean duration of follow-up was 11 ± 8 months. During follow-up, a total of 5 patients experienced a non-cardiac adverse event. At 8 months follow-up, there was no significant difference of percentage reduction of pXOR activity at day 3 between patients with and without long-term adverse events (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Percent changes in plasma XOR activity day 3 from baseline in patients with and without long-term adverse events.

Fig 3

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated that 1) compared with CAG group, a significant decrease in the percent pXOR activity from baseline at day 1 and day 2 were observed in the PCI group, and 2) larger percentage reduction of pXOR activity after PCI from baseline was associated with in-hospital outcomes.

Plasma XOR activity is known to be associated with severity and clinical outcome in chronic heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, low left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery spasm, and severely decompensated acute heart failure [7, 2022]. All of these studies indicated an elevated pXOR activity in the patients with cardiac disease suggesting that the severity of these diseases may be attributed to ROS generated by the XOR. However, it is unclear whether invasive procedures used in the treatment of cardiac disease affect pXOR activity. This study showed serial changes in pXOR activity in hospitalized patients with stable CAD, undergoing CAG or PCI. The pXOR activity notably decreased after PCI than after CAG, suggesting that PCI may be affecting the pXOR activity by relieving angina and reducing the extent of myocardial ischemia. However, patients with in-hospital adverse events had a higher percentage reduction in pXOR activity than those without in-hospital adverse events. This implies that the influence of a myocardial injury resulting from a longer procedure time is much greater than that of reducing myocardial ischemia, as it produces excessive ROS, which in turn inhibits the pXOR activity. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previous studies evaluating the repeated measurements of systemic XOR activity, showed elevated or decreased pXOR activity after PCI in stable CAD patients.

In patients with ST-elevation MI, PCI is the most important strategy used to inhibit the ongoing myocardial damage. Paradoxically, although myocardial reperfusion is essential for myocardial salvage, it comes with a price, it can in itself induce myocardial injury and cardiomyocyte death—a phenomenon termed ‘myocardial reperfusion injury’ [23]. The reperfused ischemic myocardium generates ROS. These ROS reduce the bioavailability of nitric oxide, hence affects the myocardial damage. There is no evidence, however, of generating ROS by significantly reducing the narrowing of coronary arteries by PCI. In a previous report, the quantity of total peroxides, which is a marker of oxidative stress levels, showed no significant changes during the first 48 h, while their levels declined to below baseline after 30 days post sirolimus-eluting stent implantation [24]. In our study, patients received a drug-eluting stent implantation and pXOR activity instead of the degree of oxidative stress was serially evaluated, since oxidative stress normally occurs when the balance between ROS production and antioxidant defense capacity is disrupted in favor of the former. The exact redox mechanism of CAD is complex and has not yet been fully determined [25]. In fact, the efficacy of pharmacological interventions targeting both the ROS sources and antioxidants in CAD has been inconclusive. Our study may shed some light on the future therapeutic approaches to redox systems in patients with CAD.

Xanthine oxidoreductase is involved in the production of not only ROS, but also uric acid [26]. Several studies have reported the correlation between elevated plasma uric acid levels and CAD [27, 28]. Meanwhile, low serum uric acid levels were associated with an increased risk of vascular events in men at moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk but not in women [29]. Therefore, whether uric acid has a causal relationship in these conditions remains to be determined [30]. The many potential pharmacological cardiovascular benefits of XOR inhibitors include improvement in endothelial function, decrease in tissue oxidative stress, and increase in ATP synthesis in the ischemic tissue [31]. However, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes mentioned that the role of allopurinol, a representative of the XOR inhibitors, in reducing clinical events in CAD remains unclear [32]. We exhibited decreased XOR activity after PCI irrespective of plasma uric acid levels and this may be associated with alleviated myocardial ischemia.

A previous report showed that age, DM, and CKD were associated with a high pXOR activity in outpatients with cardiovascular diseases [33]. Comorbidities including coronary risk factors may influence the baseline pXOR activity in our patients undergoing PCI. That is to say, the background of the patients undergoing PCI was not uniform at the individual level, and therefore, we evaluated the association between the percentage reduction in pXOR activity and in-hospital clinical outcomes instead of assessing the absolute level of pXOR activity. Although the pXOR activity may vary according to patient background, the percent changes in plasma XOR activity may offer superior information regarding the influence of the PCI on pXOR activity.

This study has several limitations. First, the sample size is small although the pXOR activity was measured daily during the hospitalization, implying that several measurements of pXOR activity per patients were required as compared with one-point measurements of pXOR activity. Hence, further investigation is required to clarify the relationship between the change in pXOR activity and in-hospital outcomes. Second, pXOR activity at baseline were higher in patients undergoing PCI than undergoing CAG. Therefore, the percentage reduction of pXOR activity in patients undergoing PCI might be result of a regression to the mean of pXOR activity with alleviated myocardial ischemia by revascularization. Third, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show decreased pXOR activity after PCI in patients with CAD. However, since redox is a complicated process, the mechanism involved in this decrease is unclear, therefore, a verification study should be required to confirm the consistency of the present results.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with stable CAD, showed a significant decrease in the pXOR activity after PCI than after CAG. Furthermore, it was found that a higher percentage reduction of pXOR activity after PCI was associated with in-hospital outcomes.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was conducted as a collaborative research between Hamamatsu University School of Medicine and Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. did not fund this study, but provided support in the form of salaries for TM, TN, and SA. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the “authors’ contributions section”. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Harrison D, Griendling KK, Landmesser U, Hornig B, Drexler H. Role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2003; 91(3): 7–11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03144-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burtenshaw D, Kitching M, Redmond EM, Megson IL, Cahill PA. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Intimal Thickening, and Subclinical Atherosclerotic Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019; 6: 89. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00089 eCollection 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Juni RP, Duckers HJ, Vanhoutte PM, Virmani R, Moens AL. Oxidative stress and pathological changes after coronary artery interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(14): 1471–1481. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tziomalos K, Hare JM. Role of xanthine oxidoreductase in cardiac nitroso-redox imbalance. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009; 14: 237–262. doi: 10.2741/3243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seddon M, Looi YH, Shah AM. Oxidative stress and redox signalling in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Heart. 2007; 93(8): 903–907. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.068270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakatani A, Nakatani S, Ishimura E, Murase Y, Nakamura T, Sakura M, et al. Xanthine oxidoreductase activity is associated with serum uric acid and glycemic control in hemodialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 15416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15419-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fujimura Y, Yamauchi Y, Murase T, Nakamura T, Fujita S, Fujisaka T, et al. Relationship between plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity and left ventricular ejection fraction and hypertrophy among cardiac patients. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8): e0182699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182699 eCollection 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Washio KW, Kusunoki Y, Murase T, Nakmura T, Osugi K, Ohigashi M, et al. Xanthine oxidoreductase activity is correlated with insulin resistance and subclinical inflammation in young humans. Metabolism. 2017; 70: 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.031 Epub 2017 Feb 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Furuhashi M, Matsumoto M, Tanaka M, Moniwa N, Murase T, Nakamura T, et al. Plasma Xanthine Oxidoreductase Activity as a Novel Biomarker of Metabolic Disorders in a General Population. Circ J. 2018; 82(7): 1892–1899. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0082 Epub 2018 Apr 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kawaguchi Y, Ito K, Kin h, Shirai Y, Okazaki A, Miyajima K, et al. Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure Variations Caused by Height Differences in Supine and Prone Positions on Fractional Flow Reserve Values in the Coronary Circulation. J Interv Cardiol. 2019;2019:4532862. doi: 10.1155/2019/4532862 eCollection 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sukegawa H, Maekawa Y, Yuasa S, Anzai A, Kodaira M, Takei M, et al. Intensive statin therapy stabilizes C-reactive protein, but not chemokine in stable coronary artery disease treated with an everolimus-eluting stent. Coron Artery Dis 2016; 27(5): 405–411. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mogi S, Maekawa Y, Kodaira M, Anzai A, Arai T, Kawakami T, et al. Aortic aneurysm: an independent predictor of a looped brachiocephalic trunk in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. Coron Artery Dis 2013; 24(7): 602–605. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283650254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(17): 1563–1570. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011; 123(23): 2736–2747. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murase T, Nampei M, Oka M, Ashizawa N, Matsumoto K, Miyachi A, et al. Xanthine oxidoreductase activity assay in tissues using stable isotope-labeled substrate and liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016; 1008: 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.11.030 Epub 2015 Nov 25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murase T, Oka M, Nampei M, Miyachi A, Nakamura T. A highly sensitive assay for xanthine oxidoreductase activity using a combination of [(13) C2, (15) N2] xanthine and liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2016; 59(5): 214–220. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3390 Epub 2016 Mar 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murase T, Nampei M, Oka M, Miyachi A, Nakamura T. A highly sensitive assay of human plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity using stable isotope-labeled xanthine and LC/TQMS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016; 1039: 51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.10.033 Epub 2016 Oct 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Furuhashi M, Koyama M, Higashiura Y, Murase T, Nakamura T, Matsumoto M, et al. Differential regulation of hypoxanthine and xanthine by obesity in a general population. J Diabetes Investig 2020; 11: 878–887. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13207 Epub 2020 Feb 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Otaki Y, Watanabe T, Kinoshita D, Yokoyama M, Takahashi T, Toshima T, et al. Association of plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity with severity and clinical outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 228: 151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.077 Epub 2016 Nov 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okazaki H, Shirakabe A, Matsushita M, Shibata Y, Sawatani T, Uchiyama S, et al. Plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity in patients with decompensated acute heart failure requiring intensive care. ESC Heart Fail. 2019; 6(2): 336–343. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12390 Epub 2019 Jan 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Watanabe K, Shishido T, Otaki Y, Watanabe T, Sugai T, Toshima T, et al. Increased plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity deteriorates coronary artery spasm. Heart Vessels. 2019; 34(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1207-4 Epub 2018 Jun 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frohlich GM, Meier P, White SK, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury: looking beyond primary PCI. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(23): 1714–1722. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht090 Epub 2013 Mar 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kochiadakis GE, Arfanakis DA, Marketou ME, Skalidis EI, Igoumenidis NE, Nikitovic D, et al. Oxidative stress changes after stent implantation: a randomized comparative study of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents. Int J Cardiol. 2010; 142(1): 33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.12.105 Epub 2009 Jan 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He F, Zuo L. Redox Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cardiovascular Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(11): 27770–27780. doi: 10.3390/ijms161126059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoshida S, Kurajoh M, Fukumoto S, Murase T, Nakamura T, Yoshida H, et al. Association of plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity with blood pressure affected by oxidative stress level: MedCity21 health examination registry. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 4437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61463-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andrikou I, Tsioufis C, Dimitriadis K, Konstantinidis D, Kasiakogias A, Kouremeti M, et al. Uric acid as an independent predictor of coronary artery disease in essential hypertension: Data from an 8-year-follow-up study. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2018; 45(8): 866–869. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12928 Epub 2018 Mar 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tscharre M, Herman R, Rohla M, Hauser C, Farhan S, Freynhofer MK, et al. Uric acid is associated with long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Atherosclerosis. 2018; 270: 173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.02.003 Epub 2018 Feb 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mannarino MR, Pirro M, Gigante B, Savonen K, Kurl S, Giral P, et al. Association Between Uric Acid, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, and Cardiovascular Events: Prospective Results From the IMPROVE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021Jun;10(11):e020419. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020419 Epub 2021 May 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Feig DI, Kang DH, Johnson RJ. Uric acid and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(17): 1811–1821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0800885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zdrenghea M, Sitar-Taut A, Cismaru G, Zdrenghea D, Pop D. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors in ischaemic heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2017; 28(3): 201–204. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-068 Epub 2016 Sep 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(3): 407–477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matsushita M, Shirakabe A, Okazaki H, Shibata Y, Goda H, Shigihara S, et al. Plasma Xanthine Oxidoreductase (XOR) Activity in Cardiovascular Disease Outpatients. Circulation Reports. 2020; 2(2): 104–112. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Zhejun Cai

8 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-00895

Association between plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity and in-hospital outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Maekawa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 22 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Zhejun Cai, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found athttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about 1) inclusion/exclusion criteria that were applied to participant recruitment,; 2) a priori sample size calculations performed.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

'The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.' 

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: name of commercial company.

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc. 

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study by Sato et al. investigates the influence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on plasma activity of xanthine oxidoreductase (pXOR) They found that PCI was associated with a reduction of pXOR activity. Also, a higher reduction pXOR activity was observed in subjects with peri-procedural adverse events. The article is overall well written and accurate in its analysis, nevertheless, the study has some weaknesses.

- The indications for the revascularization procedure or coronary angiography are not reported in the methods. Were all PCIs elective? Were there differences in indication between the subjects who underwent coronary angiography and those undergoing PCI?

- Since pXOR levels at baseline were higher in patients undergoing PCI, I think it cannot be excluded that the observed reduction in the levels of pXOR is the result of a regression to the mean. This aspect should be discussed at least among the limitations.

- The authors recall that XOR is involved in uric acid production and that high uric acid levels are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. The authors should mention that even low uric acid levels are independently associated with an increased risk of vascular events as also emerged from a recent study (see J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020419. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.020419. Epub 2021 May 17. PMID 33998285).

- The sentence at page 11 “However, the treatment except XOR inhibitor in cardiac diseases influence pXOR activity remains unclear.” Is not clear and should be rephrased.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 14;16(9):e0257227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257227.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Jul 2021

Point-by-point response to the Reviewers’ comments

We thank the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments. We did our best to improve the manuscript to be acceptable for publication. The responses to all comments are given below; the academic editor’s and reviewers’ comments are in bold font and our replies are in non-bold font.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We have read and understood your journal’s policies, and we believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these. The manuscript has been rechecked, and the necessary changes have been made in accordance with the reviewers’ suggestions. The changes in the manuscript are highlighted in yellow, and the responses to all comments have been prepared and attached herewith.

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

I have updated my information and my ORCID iD is now verified.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about 1) inclusion/exclusion criteria that were applied to participant recruitment, 2) a priori sample size calculations performed.

Thank you very much for your comments. We have added inclusion/exclusion criteria in this study for participant recruitment to the Materials and Methods section (Page 5, line 3-Page 6, line 5). In addition, we have added the following reference regarding FFR evaluation to our reference list (Reference #10). Furthermore, we have added a description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, so we have updated the contents of the study design and added a heading called Participants to describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria in detail (Page 5, line 3-Page 6, line 5). In accordance with the above change, the description on Page 6 line 7 has been changed from coronary angiography to CAG.

Kawaguchi Y, Ito K, Kin h, Shirai Y, Okazaki A, Miyajima K, et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Sep 2;2019:4532862. doi: 10.1155/2019/4532862. eCollection 2019.

Reference #10

We performed a priori sample size calculation and added the description to the statistical analysis section (Page 9, line 15-Page 10, line 1). Furthermore, we have added the following reference regarding sample calculation to our reference list.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G∗Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. Reference #19

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

'The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.'

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: name of commercial company.

Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

First of all, I would like to apologize for the inaccuracy of our funding statement. I would like to provide the amended Funding statement.

According to the amended Funding statement, I carefully reviewed my statements relating to the authors’ contributions again. It was decided that the author contribution form did not need to be modified and it was left as it was initially written because the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript but only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and research materials. That means three of the authors (TM, TN, and SA), who are employed by a commercial company, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusyo, are co-investigators, and Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusyo did not provide any research funds for this study.

5. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc. Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Also, I would like to apologize for the inaccuracy of our Competing Interests Statement.

I would like to provide our updated Competing Interests Statement. I have described our updated Competing Interests Statement in the cover letter according to your suggestion.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

We have carefully reviewed our reference list and updated it.

The following articles are not searchable in PubMed because the journals in which they are published are not listed in PubMed.

Nakamura T, Murase T, Satoh E, et al. Establishment of the Process in Blood Sampling and Sample Handling as a Biomarker of Hypoxia-Inducible Diseases; Plasma Hypoxanthine and Xanthine Measurement. Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis 2018; 09(05).

Therefore, the following article has been cited in the revised manuscript in place of the above article.

Furuhashi M, Koyama M, HigashiuraY, Murase T, Nakamura T, Matsumoto M, et al. Differential regulation of hypoxanthine and xanthine by obesity in a general population.

J Diabetes Investig 2020; 11: 878–887. Reference #18

In addition, we have added the following three new references to the reference list in the revised manuscript.

1. Kawaguchi Y, Ito K, Kin h, Shirai Y, Okazaki A, Miyajima K, et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Sep 2;2019:4532862. doi: 10.1155/2019/4532862. eCollection 2019. Reference #10

2. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G∗Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. Reference #19

3. Mannarino MR, Pirro M, Gigante B, Savonen K, Kurl S, Giral P, et al. Association Between Uric Acid, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, and Cardiovascular Events: Prospective Results From the IMPROVE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020419. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.020419. Epub 2021 May 17. PMID 33998285. Reference #29

Reviewer #1: The study by Sato et al. investigates the influence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on plasma activity of xanthine oxidoreductase (pXOR) They found that PCI was associated with a reduction of pXOR activity. Also, a higher reduction pXOR activity was observed in subjects with peri-procedural adverse events. The article is overall well written and accurate in its analysis, nevertheless, the study has some weaknesses.

1. The indications for the revascularization procedure or coronary angiography are not reported in the methods. Were all PCIs elective? Were there differences in indication between the subjects who underwent coronary angiography and those undergoing PCI?

Thank you for your insightful comments. Yes, all PCI were elective. We have added this point to the exclusion criteria in the Materials and Methods section. This implies that cases of acute coronary syndrome were excluded. Yes, there were differences in indication between the subjects who underwent CAG and those underwent PCI. We have added the indications for the revascularization procedure and coronary angiography to the Materials and Methods section (Page 5, line 3-Page 6, line 5).

2. Since pXOR levels at baseline were higher in patients undergoing PCI, I think it cannot be excluded that the observed reduction in the levels of pXOR is the result of a regression to the mean. This aspect should be discussed at least among the limitations.

Thank you for pointing this out. According to your suggestion, we have added this point to the discussion section (Page 15, line 18-Page 16, line 4). In addition, according to PLOS ONE submission guideline, we have removed the heading “limitations”.

3. The authors recall that XOR is involved in uric acid production and that high uric acid levels are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. The authors should mention that even low uric acid levels are independently associated with an increased risk of vascular events as also emerged from a recent study (see J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020419. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.020419. Epub 2021 May 17. PMID 33998285).

Thank you for your comments. According to your suggestion, we have added the description (highlighted in yellow) about the association between low uric acid levels and an increased risk of vascular events to the discussion section. Furthermore, we have added the suggested reference to the reference list in our revised manuscript.

Meanwhile, low serum uric acid levels were associated with an increased risk of vascular events in men at moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk but not in women [29]. Therefore, whether uric acid…(Page 14, line 11-13).

4. The sentence at page 11 “However, the treatment except XOR inhibitor in cardiac diseases influence pXOR activity remains unclear.” Is not clear and should be rephrased.

Thank you for your comment. We have revised the sentence as follows:

However, it is unclear whether invasive procedures used in the treatment of cardiac disease affect pXOR activity (Page 12, line 15-16).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers final.docx

Decision Letter 1

Zhejun Cai

27 Aug 2021

Association between plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity and in-hospital outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

PONE-D-21-00895R1

Dear Dr. Maekawa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Zhejun Cai, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Zhejun Cai

6 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-00895R1

Association between plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity and in-hospital outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

Dear Dr. Maekawa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Zhejun Cai

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers final.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES