Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are short oligonucleotides that modify gene expression and mRNA splicing in the nervous system. The FDA has approved ASOs for treatment of ten genetic disorders, with many applications currently in the pipeline. We describe the molecular mechanisms of ASO treatment for neurodevelopmental and neuromuscular disorders. The ASO Nusinersen is a general treatment for mutations of SMN1 in spinal muscular atrophy that corrects the splicing defect in the SMN2 gene. Milasen is a patient-specific ASO that rescues splicing of CNL7 in a case of Batten’s disease. STK-001 is an ASO that increases the expression of the sodium channel gene SCN1A by exclusion of a poison exon. An ASO that reduces the abundance of the SCN8A mRNA is therapeutic in mouse models of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). These examples demonstrate the variety of mechanisms and range of applications of ASOs for treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Keywords: ASO, anti-sense oligonucleotide, gene therapy, SMA, Dravet Syndrome
Introduction
The difficulties of treating neurodevelopmental disorders include their heterogeneous etiology and the requirement that therapeutic agents cross the blood-brain barrier. In addition, early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent irreversible changes. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are emerging as an exciting new approach to these challenging disorders [1].
ASOs are short oligonucleotides, ten to thirty nucleotides in length, that bind to cellular RNAs via complementary base pairing and influence pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA stability, transcription or RNA-protein interaction. The sequence specificity of ASO binding results in high specificity and a low level of side effects. ASOs can target proteins that have been considered “undruggable” by directly regulating their expression. ASO therapy can be personalized to target patient-specific mutations [2], [3]. We describe four recent examples of neurodevelopmental disorders that demonstrate the range of mutational mechanisms that can be corrected by targeted ASOs.
Chemistry of ASOs
To confer stability in vivo, ASOs are comprised of chemically-modified nucleotides with resistance to enzymatic degradation (Fig. 1A). In many ASOs, the 2’-O-methoxy-ethyl (2’-MOE) group at ribose position 3 provides resistance to digestion by endonucleases [4], [5] and replacement of the phosphate groups along the nucleic acid backbone with phosphorothioate (PS) bonds provides resistance to phosphatases [6]. Other chemical modifications have been developed to improve binding affinity, solubility, and in vivo stability [7].
Fig. 1. Chemical modifications of nucleotides in antisense oligonucleotides.

To protect ASOs from enzymatic degradation in vivo, modified nucleotides are employed. (A) 2’-O-methoxy-ethyl (2’MOE) ribose and phosphorothioate (PS) groups (B). Gap-mer ASOs contain 2’MOE modified bases at their termini (solid lines) and internal unmodified bases (dashed lines) that permit mRNA degradation by RNaseH1. (C) Binding of steric block ASOs prevents interaction with splice factors, resulting in exon skipping, as shown here, or redirection to an alternative splice site.
Two major types of ASOs are gap-mers, which target mRNA for degradation by RNAseH, and ASOs that bind pre-mRNA and alter splicing by steric hindrance. A typical 20 nucleotide gap-mer would contain PS bonds throughout and 2’MOE modifications at each end (Fig. 1A, B). When the gap-mer binds its target mRNA, the central RNA/DNA hybrid can be cleaved by RNaseH1, resulting in reduced levels of mRNA and protein (Fig. 1B). Since RNaseH1 is active in both nucleus and cytoplasm, gap-mer ASOs can target nuclear RNA such as pre-mRNA and long noncoding RNA as well as mature cytoplasmic mRNA. Gap-mers are used to reduce gene expression as an alternative to RNA interference.
Steric block ASOs are composed of nucleotides containing the 2’MOE and PS modifications and are not substrates for RNaseH. Binding of these ASOs to nuclear pre-mRNA can block interaction with splice factors, resulting in either inclusion or exclusion of nearby exons (Fig. 1C).
ASO therapy for spinal muscular atrophy
The first neuromuscular disorder successfully treated with an ASO was spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive muscle atrophy [8]. Onset of Type I SMA occurs prior to 3 months of age and is often fatal by 2 years of age, due to respiratory failure. Affected children have profound muscle weakness and are unable to sit unassisted [9]. Children with Type II SMA present between 6 and 18 months of age [9]. Although there is significant mortality, many individuals with Type II SMA survive to adulthood [10]. Type III SMA presents later than 18 months of age; patients can sit and walk unaided and have a normal lifespan [9]. The overall frequency of SMA is approximately 1/10,000 [9].
Patients with SMA carry biallelic loss-of-function variants of the SMN1 gene (survival motor neuron1). The SMN protein functions in splicing and assembly of ribonuclear proteins [11]. Human SMN is encoded by two nearly-identical genes, SMN1 and SMN2. Most protein is derived from SMN1, due to the presence in the SMN2 gene of a single nucleotide variant in intron 7 that impairs inclusion of exon 7 [12]. As a result, only 15% of SMN2 transcripts encode full length protein. The goal of ASO therapy is to increase the inclusion of exon 7 in the SMN2 transcript and restore adequate levels of SMN protein.
Nusinersen is an 18-bp ASO that is complementary to binding sites for splice silencing factors in intron 7 of SMN2 [13] (Fig. 2A). In the presence of ASO, exon 7 is included in the mRNA and the level of SMN protein is elevated. Preclinical tests in three mouse models engineered to express the human SMN2 gene demonstrated an increase in the proportion of SMN2 transcripts containing exon 7 and improvement of SMA phenotypes [14], [15]. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration in utero improved ear and tail necrosis in a model of SMA type 3 [14]. ICV administration on postnatal day 1 increased body weight, motor performance, and longevity in a model of SMA1 [15]. Intrathecal administration to nonhuman primates resulted in therapeutic levels of ASO without significant side effects [15].
Fig. 2. Mechanisms of ASO therapy for neurodevelopmental disorders.

(A) Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The SMN2 gene contains an intronic splice silencing site (ISS) in intron 7. Binding of the ASO to the ISS prevents interaction with splice silencing factors and increases inclusion of exon 7. (B) Batten’s disease. The mutant allele contains an SVA retrotransposon in intron 6 that activates a cryptic splice site. The ASO blocks a predicted splice enhancer, restoring normal splicing. (C) Dravet Syndrome. SCN1A contains the alternative exon 20N with an in-frame stop codon. Inclusion of exon 20N results in protein truncation. The ASO prevents inclusion of exon 20N and leads to increased production of full-length SCN1A protein. (D) SCN8A encephalopathy. Gain-of-function mutations result in elevated neuronal activity. Binding of the ASO to the 3’UTR of the mature mRNA provides a substrate for degradation by RNAseH1, leading to reduced protein production.
Nusinersen was approved by the FDA in 2016 for treatment of SMA. This was a major step forward for ASO therapy, establishing the effectiveness of repeated intrathecal delivery of ASOs for treatment of neurological disorders. Children with Type I SMA who receive treatment with nusinersen exhibit dramatic improvement. One physician reported that prior to treatment his son was unable to lift his arms or legs and had lost the ability to swallow, but after treatment, he began to lift his head, roll over, and sit on his own, and at the age of 2 years he began to count and learn the alphabet [16]. Children with all 3 types of SMA have been demonstrated to benefit from treatment with nusinersen, with earlier treatment providing greater benefit [17]–[19].
SMA can also be treated with a recently developed gene replacement therapy, employing the full-length SMN cDNA in an AAV9 adenovirus vector (Zolgensma) [20]. Gene replacement requires only one treatment and is administered by intravenous rather than intrathecal infusion. The long-term outcomes of the two treatments will require further study.
ASO therapy for Batten’s disease Type CLN7
Batten’s disease is group of autosomal recessive lysosomal disorders affecting the central nervous system, also known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis [2]. One type of Batten’s disease is caused by mutation of MFSD8 (CLN7), a lysosomal membrane protein. In 2019, an ASO therapy was developed for one patient with a unique mutation of MFSD8 (2). At the time of diagnosis, the patient was six years old and was experiencing developmental regression, ataxia, seizures, brain atrophy, and vision problems.
A retrotransposon insertion into MFSD8 in this patient generated a cryptic splice site resulting in a transcript with an in-frame stop codon (Figure 2B). A steric block ASO was designed to bind to a predicted splice enhancer upstream of the SVA retrotransposon in intron 6 (Figure 2B) [2]. In cultured fibroblasts from the patient, the ASO produced a 3-fold increase of correctly spliced transcript, and corrected the enlarged lysosomes.
Based on the patient’s deterioration and the known clinical course of Batten’s disease, the FDA approved an Expanded Access Investigational New Drug application. The treatment regimen was based on the earlier experience with Nusinersen. The patient received escalating doses of ASO by intrathecal injection, followed by maintenance doses every 3 months. During the first year of treatment, her rapidly worsening symptoms stabilized but neurological assessments continued to decline, suggesting that treatment may prevent further neurodegeneration but not restore lost function. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for treatment of Batten disease.
Milasen, named after the patient, is an exciting example of development of precision therapy for individual patients, so-called “N of one” therapy. This success demonstrates the importance of developing a standardized process for obtaining FDA approval for individualized ASOs.
ASO therapy for Dravet Syndrome, a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are rare epilepsy disorders characterized by severe seizures, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. Dravet Syndrome is a DEE caused by haploinsufficiency of the sodium channel gene SCN1A. The goal of ASO treatment for Dravet Syndrome is to up-regulate the wildtype allele to compensate for the inactive mutant allele. This is possible due to the presence of an alternative “poison” exon in the SCN1A gene with an in-frame stop codon that is included in a subset of SCN1A transcripts [21]. A steric block ASO was designed to prevent inclusion of the poison exon (Fig. 2C). In cultured cells this ASO reduced the presence of the poison exon from 60% of transcripts to fewer than 5% of transcripts [22]. In wildtype mice, administration of ASO by intracerebroventricular injection at P2 resulted in a 3-fold increase in full-length mRNA and a corresponding increase in SCN1A protein.
Administration of the ASO to haploinsufficient Scn1a mice prevented the premature death that occurs in 50% of mutant mice by 4 weeks of age [22]. ASO treatment also reduced the number of seizures and delayed seizure onset. A phase 1/2 clinical trial of this ASO in Dravet Syndrome patients is in progress (https://www.monarchstudy.com/#!/).
Development of an ASO treatment for SCN8A encephalopathy
SCN8A encephalopathy is a DEE caused by de novo mutation of SCN8A, which encodes Nav1.6, a major neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel [23]. These mutations result in gain-of-function effects on the channel protein, excess neuronal excitability, and seizures [24], [25]. To counteract the effects of elevated sodium channel activity, we developed a 20 nucleotide gap-mer to reduce the abundance of Scn8a transcript via digestion by RNAseH (Fig. 2D), resulting in reduced production of the mutant protein.
Scn8a mutant mice were treated with ASO by ICV injection at postnatal day 2, prior to the onset of symptoms [26]. Mice receiving two ASO treatments lived for nine weeks, compared to the two week survival of untreated mice. Three weeks after treatment, Scn8a transcript levels were reduced to 50% of wildtype levels. These results suggest that ASOs reducing expression of SCN8A would be therapeutic in humans with SCN8A encephalopathy, if the negative consequences of very low expression can be avoided [27].
Haploinsufficiency of SCN1A in Dravet Syndrome reduces the firing of inhibitory neurons [28]. We hypothesized that reducing the expression of Scn8a in Dravet Syndrome might compensate for the haploinsufficiency of Scn1a and restore the excitatory/inhibitory balance. Administration of the Scn8a ASO by ICV injection at postnatal day 2 rescued the Scn1a mutant mice, with no deaths or seizures up to 6 months of age [26]. These results suggest that ASO reduction of SCN8A expression could be an effective therapy for patients with other genetic epilepsies as well as SCN8A encephalopathy.
Challenges in development of ASO therapies.
Several factors complicate the use of ASOs for neurodevelopmental disorders. Since currently constituted ASOs do not cross the blood-brain barrier, injection into the cerebrospinal fluid is required for efficient neuronal uptake. In addition, the limited half-lives intrathecal administration require two to four treatments per year. Since both gain-of-function and loss-of-function variants of the same gene can be pathogenic, it is necessary to determine the mode of action of each variant before designing the ASO treatment. The quantitative level of elevated or reduced expression is another important consideration. For example, treatment of gain-of-function variants of SCN8A in DEE require reduced gene expression, but haploinsufficiency is associated with another, less severe, disorder (26). Finally, because of the timing of development of the nervous system, it may be necessary to initiate treatment very early.
Conclusion
The FDA approval of Nusinersen in 2016 was a landmark for ASO therapy, demonstrating the feasibility of treating neurological disorders by repeated intrathecal administration of ASOs. The current status of the examples described here is summarized in Table 1. Many additional ASO therapies for the treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are in preclinical development and clinical trials. Future development of methods of systemic administration, such as packaging in nanoparticles that cross the blood-brain barrier, would facilitate broader application. Thus far, ASO treatment has been limited to rare genetic diseases. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of autism, depression, and Alzheimer’s Disease may permit the application of ASOs to these common, devastating disorders.
Table 1.
Status of four ASO therapies described here.
| gene and disorder | Effect | Chemistry | Status | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMN2
SMA (Nusinersen |
exon inclusion | fully modified phosphorothioate and 2’-MOE | FDA approved | 13,14,16–18 |
|
CLN7 Batten (Milasen) |
exon exclusion | fully modified phosphorothioate and 2’-MOE | FDA approved | 2 |
|
SCN1A Dravet (STK-001) |
exon exclusion | fully modified phosphorothioate and 2’-MOE | stage 2 clinical trials | 20,21 |
| SCN8A DEE | mRNA degradation | gapmer | pre-clinical | 25 |
Funding Source:
The preparation of this review was supported by NIH Grant R01 NS0034509-25.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- [1].Corey DR, “Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide drug for spinal muscular atrophy,” Nat. Neurosci, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 497–499, April. 2017, 10.1038/nn.4508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Kim J et al. , “Patient-Customized Oligonucleotide Therapy for a Rare Genetic Disease,” N Engl J Med, vol. 381, no. 17, pp. 1644–1652, 2019, 10.1056/NEJMoa1813279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Carroll JB et al. , “Potent and Selective Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Huntington Disease Gene / Allele-Specific Silencing of Mutant Huntingtin,” Mol. Ther, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2178–2185, December. 2011, 10.1038/mt.2011.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Monia BP et al. , “Evaluation of 2’-modified oligonucleotides containing 2’-deoxy gaps as antisense inhibitors of gene expression,” J. Biol. Chem, vol. 268, no. 19, pp. 14514–22, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].McKay RA, Miraglia LJ, Cummins LL, Owens SR, Sasmor H, and Dean NM, “Characterization of a Potent and Specific Class of Antisense Oligonucleotide Inhibitor of Human Protein Kinase C-α Expression,” J. Biol. Chem, vol. 274, no. 3, pp. 1715–1722, January. 1999, 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Khvorova A and Watts JK, “The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility,” Nat. Biotechnol, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 238–248, March. 2017, 10.1038/nbt.3765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Shen W et al. , “Chemical modification of PS-ASO therapeutics reduces cellular protein-binding and improves the therapeutic index,” Nat. Biotechnol, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 640–650, June. 2019, 10.1038/s41587-019-0106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Kolb SJ, “Spinal Muscular Atrophy,” Arch. Neurol, vol. 68, no. 8, p. 979, August. 2011, 10.1001/archneurol.2011.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Crawford TO and Pardo CA, “The Neurobiology of Childhood Spinal Muscular Atrophy,” Neurobiol. Dis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–110, April. 1996, 10.1006/nbdi.1996.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Forrest E, Lusakowska A, Borkowska J, and Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I, “A collaborative study on the natural history of childhood and juvenile onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy (type II and III SMA): 569 patients,” J. Neurol. Sci, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 67–72, February. 1997, 10.1016/S0022-510X(96)00284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Coovert D, “The survival motor neuron protein in spinal muscular atrophy,” Hum. Mol. Genet, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1205–1214, August. 1997, 10.1093/hmg/6.8.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Lefebvre S et al. , “Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene,” Cell, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 155–165, January. 1995, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Rigo F et al. , “Pharmacology of a Central Nervous System Delivered 2′-O-Methoxyethyl–Modified Survival of Motor Neuron Splicing Oligonucleotide in Mice and Nonhuman Primates,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 46–55, July. 2014, 10.1124/jpet.113.212407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Hua Y et al. , “Antisense correction of SMN2 splicing in the CNS rescues necrosis in a type III SMA mouse model,” Genes Dev, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 1634–1644, August. 2010, 10.1101/gad.1941310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Passini MA et al. , “Antisense Oligonucleotides Delivered to the Mouse CNS Ameliorate Symptoms of Severe Spinal Muscular Atrophy,” Sci. Transl. Med, vol. 3, no. 72, pp. 72ra18–72ra18, March. 2011, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Hoot NR, “Nusinersen for Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Father’s Perspective,” Pediatrics, vol. 144, no. 4, p. e20190226, October. 2019, 10.1542/peds.2019-0226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Chiriboga CA et al. , “Results from a phase 1 study of nusinersen (ISIS-SMN Rx ) in children with spinal muscular atrophy,” Neurology, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 890–897, March. 2016, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Finkel RS et al. , “Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study,” Lancet, vol. 388, no. 10063, pp. 3017–3026, 2016, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Osredkar D et al. , “Children and young adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen,” Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–8, January. 2021, 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Mendell JR et al. , “Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy,” N. Engl. J. Med, vol. 377, no. 18, pp. 1713–1722, November. 2017, 10.1056/nejmoa1706198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lim KH et al. , “Antisense oligonucleotide modulation of non-productive alternative splicing upregulates gene expression,” Nat. Commun, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3501, December. 2020, 10.1038/s41467-020-17093-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Han Z et al. , “Antisense oligonucleotides increase Scn1a expression and reduce seizures and SUDEP incidence in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome,” Sci. Transl. Med, vol. 12, no. 558, p. eaaz6100, August. 2020, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz6100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Larsen J et al. , “The phenotypic spectrum of SCN8A encephalopathy,” Neurology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 480–489, February. 2015, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Meisler MH, “SCN8A encephalopathy: Mechanisms and models,” Epilepsia, vol. 60, no. S3, December. 2019, 10.1111/epi.14703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Meisler MH et al. , “SCN8A encephalopathy: Research progress and prospects,” Epilepsia, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1027–1035, July. 2016, 10.1111/epi.13422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Lenk GM et al. , “Scn8a Antisense Oligonucleotide Is Protective in Mouse Models of SCN8A Encephalopathy and Dravet Syndrome,” Ann Neurol, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 339–346, 2020, 10.1002/ana.25676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Meisler MH, Hill SF, and Yu W, “Sodium Channelopathies in Neurodevelopmental Disorders,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- [28].Ogiwara I et al. , “Nav1.1 Localizes to Axons of Parvalbumin-Positive Inhibitory Interneurons: A Circuit Basis for Epileptic Seizures in Mice Carrying an Scn1a Gene Mutation,” J. Neurosci, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 5903–5914, May 2007, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5270-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
