Abstract
BACKGROUND:
We previously found that atorvastatin (ATV) enhanced mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) migration, by a yet unknown mechanism. CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is critical to cell migration and regulated by microRNA-146a (miR-146a). Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether ATV ameliorates MSCs migration through miR-146a/CXCR4 signaling.
METHODS:
Expression of CXCR4 was evaluated by flow cytometry. Expression of miR-146a was examined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. A transwell system was used to assess the migration ability of MSCs. Recruitment of systematically delivered MSCs to the infarcted heart was evaluated in Sprague–Dawley rats with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Mimics of miR-146a were used in vitro, and miR-146a overexpression lentivirus was used in vivo, to assess the role of miR-146a in the migration ability of MSCs.
RESULTS:
The results showed that ATV pretreatment in vitro upregulated CXCR4 and induced MSCs migration. In addition, flow cytometry demonstrated that miR-146a mimics suppressed CXCR4, and ATV pretreatment no longer ameliorated MSCs migration because of decreased CXCR4. In the AMI model, miR-146a-overexpressing MSCs increased infarct size and fibrosis.
CONCLUSION:
The miR-146a/CXCR4 signaling pathway contributes to MSCs migration and homing induced by ATV pretreatment. miR-146a may be a novel therapeutic target for stimulating MSCs migration to the ischemic tissue for improved repair.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction, Atorvastatin, Mesenchymal stem cells, Cell migration, MicroRNA-146a
Introduction
Stem cell therapy represents a novel tool for treating ischemia-associated heart pathologies [1–4]. Of all cell types assessed so far, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which show multi-directional differentiation potential, reduced immunogenicity, high portability and anti-inflammation, could constitute ideal seed cells for repairing the injured myocardium [5–7]. However, poor viability of MSCs upon exposure to unfriendly engraftment conditions in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hampers their use [8, 9]. Hence, increasing MSCs survival is a major hurdle in this setting.
Statins, a group of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, exert multiple biological effects beside lowering lipid levels, including antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities [10–13]. In animals, for stem and progenitor cells, statins have been demonstrated to affect their biology and function, such as improving cells mobilization, proliferation and regenerative potential [14, 15]. In porcine MSCs cultured under hypoxia and serum-free conditions, atorvastatin reduced their apoptosis [16]. Moreover, statins can improve the hostile microenvironment in the post-infarct myocardium, thus enhance the regenerative potential of transplanted cells [17]. In patients, statins obviously reduce morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease [18, 19]. Compared with regular statin, intensive statin treatment enhances the survival and angiogenesis of transplanted bone marrow mononuclear cells, and produces greater therapeutic benefits in patients suffering from anterior ST-elevated myocardial infarction [20].
We previously found that atorvastatin (ATV) pretreatment enhanced MSCs migration and ameliorates heart function in a rat AMI model [21], by a yet unknown mechanism. It is admitted that CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is critical to cell migration and regulated by microRNA-146a (miR-146a) [22, 23]. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether ATV ameliorates MSCs migration through the miR-146a/CXCR4 signaling pathway.
Materials and methods
Animals
Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were assessed in this study. Experiments involving animals had approval from the Care of Experimental Animals Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. MSCs were isolated from male SD (60–80 g), while the AMI model was established in female animals (200–220 g).
Cell isolation and culture
After bone marrow collection from the tibia and femur of male rats, the specimens were placed in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Cell culture was carried out at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. At 70–80% confluency, the cells underwent subculture at a ratio of 1:2. Passage three-cells were evaluated in subsequent assays.
Cell treatment
MSCs were pretreated with ATV at the optimal concentration (1 μM) for 12 h as previously reported [21]. All cells were grown at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment.
Cell transfection
MSCs were grown in complete medium in six-well plates. For transfection, miR-146a mimics and microRNA negative control (GenePharma, Shanghai, China), respectively, were incubated with MSCs at 70–80% confluency in presence of Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), in Opti-MEM R Reduced Serum Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The rno-miR-146a mimics had the following sequences: sense, 5′-UGAGAACUGAAUUCCAUGGGUU-3′; antisense, 5′-CCCAUGGAAUUCAGUUCUCAUU-3′. Next, GFP-labeled lentivirus (GenePharma) transfection was performed: when MSCs reached 50% confluence, miR-146a-overexpressing lentivirus and microRNA negative control, respectively, were transfected into MSCs at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment with the help of polybrene.
Flow cytometry
To assess cell surface CXCR4 amounts in MSCs, rabbit polyclonal antibodies targeting rat CXCR4 (Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel) were used as directed by the manufacturer. In brief, washed MSCs underwent staining with 1 mg/mL CXCR4 for 20 min at ambient. After another washing step, 300 μL PBS was used for cell resuspension. Isotype controls were assessed in parallel. Analysis was carried out on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer with the Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA).
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
MiR-146a was reverse transcribed using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcript Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and quantitated by PCR with TaqMan MicroRNA Assays Kit (Invitrogen) on an ABI 7500 RT-qPCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Specific primers for miR-146a and U6 were obtained from Qiagen. The 2−△△CT method was utilized for data analysis.
Transwell migration assay
Cell migration was assessed in 24-wellpolycarbonate transwell plates (8-μm pores; Corning, Corning, NY, USA ). MSCs (100 μL) at 106 cells/mL in IMEM were added to the upper chamber, with 600 μL medium containing 50 ng/mL of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) (Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA) in the lower chamber. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 6 h, and non-migrated cells were removed from the upper surface of the membrane. After PBS wash, 4% formalin fixation was performed (15 min) followed by 0.5% crystal violet staining (20 min). Migrated cells were counted in 5 randomly selected high-power fields at × 200 under a Leica microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Quadruplicate experiments were carried out.
AMI model establishment and cell transplantation
Female SD rats were used for AMI model establishment [24, 25]. In brief, permanent left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) ligation was carried out. The sham group was operated by passing a suture around the LAD with no ligation. The animals were assigned to the Sham (sham operation), PBS (AMI + PBS), MSCs (AMI + MSCs), ATV-MSCs (AMI + ATV-pretreated-MSCs), ATV + LV-miR-146a (AMI + ATV-pretreated-lentivirus transfected-miRNA-146a overexpressing-MSCs) and ATV + LV-NC (AMI + ATV pretreated-lentivirus transfected-miRNA-146a negative control-MSCs) groups. Totally 24 h after AMI, 2.0 × 106 MSCs in 500 μL PBS or 500 μL PBS were administered by tail vein injection.
Echocardiographic assessment
Transthoracic echocardiography was carried out on a Sonos 7500 (Phillips) with a 12-MHz phased-array transducer to measure cardiac function and ventricular dimensions at 3 (baseline) and 30 (endpoint) days following cell transplantation [24]. The hearts (n = 5/group) were assessed in 2D and M-mode from the parasternal long-axis view at the papillary muscle level. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd) and end-systolic dimension (LVESd) were assessed for ≥ 3 successive cardiac cycles. Left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) was derived as [(LVEDd-LVESd)/LVEDd] × 100%, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined as [(LVEDd)3-(LVESd)3]/(LVEDd)3] × 100%. An experienced sonographer carried out all measurements in a blinded manner.
Histological assessment
Animal sacrifice was carried out 30 days following cell transplantation. Heart specimens underwent fixation with 10% formalin, paraffin embedding, sectioning at 4 μm (mid-LV level), and staining with Masson’s Trichrome and hematoxylin–eosin (H&E). Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA proportion of fibrotic areas was determined as (fibrotic) was utilized for quantitation. The proportion of fibrotic areas was determined as (fibrotic length/LV circumference) × 100%. Triplicate assays were performed.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 23.0 was utilized for data analysis. Data are mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA (multiple groups) and Student’s t test (group pairs) were carried out for comparisons. Two-sided p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results
ATV pretreatment increases CXCR4 amounts and migration in MSCs
CXCR4 expression was significantly increased by ATV pretreatment as assessed by flow cytometry (21.98 ± 2.38% vs. 2.09 ± 0.30%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1), which was consistent with our previous findings [21]. Moreover, MSCs after ATV pretreatment had increased migration in comparison with untreated MSCs (22.05 ± 4.28 vs. 10.15 ± 1.95, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
ATV enhances surface CXCR4 amounts in MSCs as evaluated by flow cytometry. A Representative flow-cytograms in both groups. B Quantification of flow cytometry results. Data are mean ± SD; *p < 0.05 vs. MSCs (n = 4). ATV, atorvastatin; CXCR4, CXC chemokine receptor 4; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs
Fig. 2.
ATV enhances MSCs migration in vitro as assessed by transwell assay. A Representative images of migrated MSCs in both groups (magnification × 200). B Quantification of transwell images. Data are mean ± SD; *p < 0.05 versus MSCs (n = 4). ATV, atorvastatin; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs
ATV pretreatment decreases miR-146a expression in MSCs
To explore the mechanism by which ATV upregulates CXCR4, miR-146a expression in MSCs was examined by RT-qPCR. Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-146a targets CXCR4 mRNA [15]. In comparison with the MSCs group, the ATV pretreatment group showed markedly reduced miR-146a amounts (0.41 ± 0.11 vs. 1.00 ± 0.00, p < 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

ATV decreases miR-146a expression in MSCs as analyzed by RT-qPCR. Data are mean ± SD; *p < 0.05 versus MSCs (n = 3). ATV, atorvastatin; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs
MiR-146a is involved in CXCR4 upregulation by ATV pretreatment
To examine whether miR-146a contributes to CXCR4 upregulation under ATV pretreatment, mimics were used for upregulating miR-146a in MSCs. MSCs transfection with miR-146a mimics were followed by preconditioning with 1 μM ATV for 12 h. In flow cytometry analysis, miR-146a mimics decreased cell surface CXCR4 amounts compared with the ATV pretreatment group (2.31 ± 0.38% vs. 22.52 ± 3.10%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4). Because of decreased cell surface CXCR4 level, migration in MSCs was inhibited (9.90 ± 1.06 vs. 23.45 ± 4.82, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5), indicating that elevated miR-146a amounts blunted ATV-induced migratory potential.
Fig. 4.
Overexpression of miR-146a reduces cell surface expression of CXCR4 in MSCs. A Representative flow-cytograms in various treatment groups. B Quantitation of flow cytometry results. Data are mean ± SD; n = 4/group; *p < 0.05 versus MSCs; †p < 0.05 versus ATV-MSCs; ‡p < 0.05 versus ATV + miR-146a-Mi. ATV, atorvastatin; CXCR4, CXC chemokine receptor 4; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs; ATV + miR-146a-Mi, ATV + miRNA-146a mimics; ATV + Mi-NC, ATV + miRNA-146a mimics-negative control
Fig. 5.
Overexpression of miR-146a decreases the migratory ability of MSCs. A Representative images of migrated MSCs in various groups (magnification × 200). B Quantitation of transwell results. Data are mean ± SD; n = 4/group; *p < 0.05 versus MSCs; †p < 0.05 versus ATV-MSCs; ‡p < 0.05 versus ATV + miRNA-146a Mi. ATV, atorvastatin; CXCR4, CXC chemokine receptor 4; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs; ATV + miR-146a-Mi, ATV + miRNA-146a mimics; ATV + Mi-NC, ATV + miRNA-146a mimics-negative control
MiR-146a-overexpressing MSCs increase myocardium infarct size and enhance fibrosis
In this study, Masson’s Trichrome staining showed transmural infarction in every group, indicating the success of AMI modeling (Fig. 6A, B). In the MSCs-treatment group, thinner anterior wall, bigger LV chamber size, severer fibrosis and larger infarct size were observed. In the ATV-MSCs group, these effects were markedly improved. However, the beneficial effects of ATV were abrogated by miR-146a overexpression.
Fig. 6.
Masson’s trichrome and Hematoxylin–Eosin staining findings. A Representative micrographs after Masson’s trichrome staining in various groups (magnification × 12.5). B Quantitation of left ventricle fibrotic areas. C Inflammatory cell infiltration in the heart tissue in peri-infarct areas (magnification × 400). Data are mean ± SD; n = 5/group; *p < 0.05 versus PBS; †p < 0.05 vs. MSCs; ‡p < 0.05 versus ATV-MSCs. MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; ATV-MSCs, atorvastatin-pretreated MSCs; ATV + LV-miR-146a, ATV-pretreated-lentivirus transfected-miRNA-146a overexpressing-MSCs; ATV + LV-NC, ATV pretreated-lentivirus transfected -miRNA-146a negative control-MSCs
The degree of inflammation in the infarcted heart was assessed by H&E staining. As shown in Fig. 6C, reduced inflammatory cells infiltration was found in the ATV-MSCs group in comparison with the remaining groups, and the anti-inflammatory effect of ATV was diminished by miR-146a overexpression.
MiR-146a-overexpressing MSCs decrease cardiac function
The baseline parameters of cardiac function at 3 days post-stem cell transplantation (4 days following AMI modeling) suggested that the AMI model was successfully and stably established (Table 1).
Table 1.
Left ventricular dimensions and function at baseline and endpoint
| Parameter | LVEDd(mm) | LVESd(mm) | LVFS(%) | LVEF(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | ||||
| Sham | 6.05 ± 0.48 | 3.79 ± 0.20 | 37.20 ± 3.06 | 75.09 ± 3.64 |
| PBS | 6.74 ± 0.48* | 5.30 ± 0.39* | 21.33 ± 4.51* | 50.92 ± 8.47* |
| MSCs | 6.80 ± 0.40* | 5.40 ± 0.47* | 20.68 ± 3.60* | 49.84 ± 7.08* |
| ATV-MSCs | 6.91 ± 0.21* | 5.41 ± 0.53* | 21.83 ± 5.97* | 51.58 ± 10.35* |
| ATV + LV-miR-146a | 6.81 ± 0.32* | 5.36 ± 0.58* | 21.32 ± 5.81* | 50.65 ± 11.46* |
| ATV + LV-NC | 6.96 ± 0.21* | 5.54 ± 0.31* | 20.46 ± 4.14* | 49.35 ± 7.85* |
| Endpoint | ||||
| Sham | 6.19 ± 0.32 | 3.87 ± 0.30 | 37.53 ± 3.50 | 75.43 ± 4.16 |
| PBS | 9.41 ± 1.31* | 7.76 ± 0.75* | 17.16 ± 3.99* | 42.82 ± 8.28* |
| MSCs | 8.29 ± 0.94*† | 6.36 ± 0.53* | 23.00 ± 4.45*† | 53.98 ± 7.68*† |
| ATV-MSCs | 7.37 ± 0.95*†‡ | 5.22 ± 0.64*† | 29.19 ± 3.08*†‡ | 64.33 ± 4.65*†‡ |
| ATV + LV-miR-146a | 8.01 ± 0.84*†☆ | 6.12 ± 0.67*† | 23.58 ± 3.61*†☆ | 55.14 ± 6.13*†☆ |
| ATV + LV-NC | 7.10 ± 1.03*†‡# | 4.95 ± 0.72† | 30.07 ± 4.42*†‡# | 65.48 ± 6.39*†‡# |
All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5 in each group)
Baseline = 3 days after stem cell transplantation; Endpoint = 30 days after stem cell transplantation
LVEDd left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LVESd left ventricular end-systolic dimension, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVFS left ventricular fractional shortening
*p < 0.05 versus sham; †p < 0.05 versus PBS; ‡p < 0.05 versus MSCs; ☆p < 0.05 versus ATV-MSCs; #p < 0.05 versus ATV + LV-miR-146a
LVEDd and LVESd were obviously elevated in the PBS group at 30 days (endpoint), indicating an enlargement of the LV chamber. A moderate LV chamber improvement was seen in the MSCs group, and this amelioration was more pronounced in the ATV-MSCs group. Meanwhile, an indicator of cardiac function, LVEF, was markedly elevated in the MSCs group in comparison with the PBS group. LVEF and LVFS were drastically improved in the ATV-MSCs group in comparison with the PBS and MSCs groups. The above findings indicated that ATV-pretreated MSCs starkly promoted cardiac function recovery and suppressed cardiac remodeling, while miR-146a-overexpressing MSCs abrogated the beneficial effects of ATV pretreatment.
Discussion
This work confirmed that ATV pretreatment upregulated CXCR4, increased migration and homing ability in MSCs and improved cardiac performance, consistent with our previous study [21]. In the present study, the mechanism by which ATV pretreatment enhances MSCs migration was further investigated. The beneficial effect of ATV was abrogated by overexpressing miR-146a, indicating that elevated CXCR4 expression by ATV is attributable to miR-146a downregulation.
MSCs transplantation into the infarcted heart represents a promising new strategy to cure the infarcted myocardium [7, 26]. However, donor MSCs are poorly engrafted, limiting the reparative potential of this treatment. Recruiting a greater number of MSCs to the ischemic myocardium can effectively increase the therapeutic efficacy of engrafted cells. MSCs movement is mostly regulated by SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 [27–29].
It is well-known that SDF-1 and CXCR4 constitute major factors in cell mobilization and homing. SDF-1 is highly expressed in the infarcted myocardium, and represents an important mobilization or retention signal to attract CXCR4-positive stem cells for healing [30, 31]. CXCR4 is highly expressed in bone marrow MSCs. However, the level is overtly decreased during ex vivo cell expansion, reducing migration toward the SDF-1 gradient [32, 33]. Methods for enhancing CXCR4 expression have been investigated. Virus transduction constitutes one of the proposed techniques, but seems infeasible in clinical practice currently [34, 35]. Drug pretreatment is a much more simple and feasible method [36]. Among the drugs used, ATV is highly effective. As demonstrated in our previous and present studies, ATV pretreatment increased CXCR4 expression and migratory potential in MSCs, and improved cardiac performance [21]. As a lipid-lowering drug, ATV is widely used in clinical practice, and can be obtained easily. Therefore, the current findings have obvious translational implications for treating patients with AMI.
As is well known, statins exert pleiotropic and cholesterol-independent effects on the cardiovascular system [37]. Statins are molecules of fungal origin, and each vary in their lipophilicity, elimination half lives, and potency [38]. Common statins include lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin and so on, which are used to lower the blood cholesterol level and reduce the risk of heart disease [39]. Among them, ATV is the most prescribed one. Experimental studies have revealed that in the ischemic heart ATV increases mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells and myocardial neovascularization, and results in improved heart function [40]. Moreover, in the swine AMI model, ATV treatment improves the post-infarct microenvironment, and facilitates the survival and therapeutic action of implanted stem cells, by significantly reducing oxidative stress and suppressing expression of the inflammatory cytokines in the post-infarct myocardium [17, 41]. The effects of statins on stem cells have also been evaluated in human studies. Treatment of statins further increase stem cells mobilization after AMI [42]. Intensive statin therapy has been demonstrated to lower the risk of recurrence of major cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome [43]. To clarify whether intensive ATV increases the efficacy of transplanted bone marrow mononuclear cells, a study was conducted in patients with anterior ST-elevated myocardial infarction. In comparison with regular ATV, intensive ATV treatment improves the therapeutic efficacy of transplanted cells, probably for that intensive ATV could further improve the hostile microenvironment in the infarcted area and increase implanted cells survival and possible regeneration [20].
MiRNAs, a family of noncoding single-stranded RNAs consisting of approximately 22 nucleotides, regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally via two mechanisms: mRNA clearance and repression of productive translation [44]. They modulate multiple cellular events, including proliferation, differentiation and migration [45, 46]. Previous studies have indicated that CXCR4 is post-transcriptionally regulated by miR-146a [47, 48]. Spinello et al. [49] found that in acute monocytic leukemia, high CXCR4 protein levels are associated with low/absent expression of miR-146a; conversely, miR-146a overexpression in leukemic cells decreases CXCR4 protein amounts. Whether miR-146a controls CXCR4 expression to contribute to MSCs migration was the main focus of this study. As shown above, high CXCR4 protein amounts, induced by miR-146a downregulation with ATV pretreatment, were required for the migration and homing of MSCs. Conversely, miR-146a overexpression downregulated CXCR4 and suppressed MSCs migration and homing, inducing cardiac remodeling and dysfunction.
Overall, miR-146a suppression by ATV pretreatment upregulates CXCR4, promoting MSCs mobilization and migration, and improving the performance of the infarcted heart. These findings suggest that miR-146a/CXCR4 signaling contributes to MSCs migration and homing upon ATV pretreatment. Thus, miR-146a may be a novel therapeutic target for stimulating MSCs mobilization to the ischemic tissue for efficient repair.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81500270 and 81700299).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical statement
The animal studies were performed after receiving approval from the Care of Experimental Animals Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital (Approval No. 2020-Animal-271).
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Jeevanantham V, Butler M, Saad A, Abdel-Latif A, Zuba-Surma EK, Dawn B. Adult bone marrow cell therapy improves survival and induces long-term improvement in cardiac parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2012;126:551–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Parizadeh SM, Jafarzadeh-Esfehani R, Ghandehari M, Parizadeh MR, Ferns GA, Avan A, et al. Stem cell therapy: a novel approach for myocardial infarction. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:16904–16912. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barzegar M, Kaur G, Gavins FNE, Wang Y, Boyer CJ, Alexander JS. Potential therapeutic roles of stem cells in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Res. 2019;37:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Samak M, Hinkel R. Stem cells in cardiovascular medicine: historical overview and future prospects. Cells. 2019;8:1530. doi: 10.3390/cells8121530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Karantalis V, Hare JM. Use of mesenchymal stem cells for therapy of cardiac disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:1413–1430. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Narita T, Suzuki K. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2015;20:53–68. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9435-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miao C, Lei M, Hu W, Han S, Wang Q. A brief review: the therapeutic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:242. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0697-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Segers VF, Lee RT. Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease. Nature. 2008;451:937–942. doi: 10.1038/nature06800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luger D, Lipinski MJ, Westman PC, Glover DK, Dimastromatteo J, Frias JC, et al. Intravenously delivered mesenchymal stem cells: systemic anti-inflammatory effects improve left ventricular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2017;120:1598–1613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liao JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:89–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang YJ, Qian HY, Huang J, Li JJ, Gao RL, Dou KF, et al. Combined therapy with simvastatin and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells increases benefits in infarcted swine hearts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:2076–2082. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.189662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tian XQ, Yang YJ, Li Q, Xu J, Huang PS, Xiong YY, et al. Combined therapy with atorvastatin and atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells enhances cardiac performance after acute myocardial infarction by activating SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:4214–4231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gorabi AM, Kiaie N, Hajighasemi S, Banach M, Penson PE, Jamialahmadi T, et al. Statin-induced nitric oxide signaling: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Clin Med. 2019;8:2051. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Assmus B, Urbich C, Aicher A, Hofmann WK, Haendeler J, Rössig L, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors reduce senescence and increase proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells via regulation of cell cycle regulatory genes. Circ Res. 2003;92:1049–1055. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000070067.64040.7C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Zaromitidou M, Hatzis G, Mourouzis KA, Chrysohoou M, et al. Atorvastatin treatment improves endothelial function through endothelial progenitor cells mobilization in ischemic heart failure patients. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238:159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong Q, Yang Y, Song L, Qian H, Xu Z. Atorvastatin prevents mesenchymal stem cells from hypoxia and serum-free injury through activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Int J Cardiol. 2011;153:311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang YJ, Qian HY, Huang J, Geng YJ, Gao RL, Dou KF, et al. Atorvastatin treatment improves survival and effects of implanted mesenchymal stem cells in post-infarct swine hearts. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1578–1590. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388:2532–2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schmidt-Lucke C, Fichtlscherer S, Rössig L, Kämper U, Dimmeler S. Improvement of endothelial damage and regeneration indexes in patients with coronary artery disease after 4 weeks of statin therapy. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211:249–254. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang YJ, Qian HY, Song L, Geng L, Gao RL, Li N, et al. Strengthening effects of bone marrow mononuclear cells with intensive atorvastatin in acute myocardial infarction. Open Heart. 2020;7:e001139. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li N, Yang YJ, Qian HY, Li Q, Zhang Q, Li XD, et al. Intravenous administration of atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac performance after acute myocardial infarction: role of CXCR4. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:1058–1070. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Labbaye C, Spinello I, Quaranta MT, Pelosi E, Pasquini L, Petrucci E, et al. A three-step pathway comprising PLZF/miR-146a/CXCR4 controls megakaryopoiesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:788–801. doi: 10.1038/ncb1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang W, Zhang Y, Liu W, Xiao H, Zhang Q, Wang J, et al. LMP1-miR-146a-CXCR4 axis regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis. Virus Res. 2019;270:197654. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xu H, Yang YJ, Qian HY, Tang YD, Wang H, Zhang Q. Rosuvastatin treatment activates JAK-STAT pathway and increases efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in infarcted hearts. Circ J. 2011;75:1476–1485. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muller-Ehmsen J, Peterson KL, Kedes L, Whittaker L, Dow L, Long TI. Rebuilding a damaged heart: long-term survival of transplanted neonatal rat cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction and effect on cardiac function. Circulation. 2002;105:1720–1726. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000013782.76324.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nigro P, Bassetti B, Cavallotti L, Catto V, Carbucicchio C, Pompilio G. Cell therapy for heart disease after 15 years: Unmet expectations. Pharmacol Res. 2018;127:77–91. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu X, Zhu F, Zhang M, Zeng D, Luo D, Liu G, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 enhances wound healing through recruiting bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the wound area and promoting neovascularization. Cells Tissues Organs. 2013;197:103–113. doi: 10.1159/000342921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kitaori T, Ito H, Schwarz EM, Tsutsumi R, Yoshitomi H, Oishi S. Stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCR4 signaling is critical for the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the fracture site during skeletal repair in a mouse model. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:813–823. doi: 10.1002/art.24330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Song YL, Jiang H, Jiang NG, Jin YM, Zeng TT. Mesenchymal stem cell-platelet aggregates increased in the peripheral blood of patients with acute myocardial infarction and might depend on the stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCR4 Axis. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28:1607–1619. doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma J, Ge J, Zhang S, Sun A, Shen J, Chen L, et al. Time course of myocardial stromal cell-derived factor 1 expression and beneficial effects of intravenously administered bone marrow stem cells in rats with experimental myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol. 2005;100:217–223. doi: 10.1007/s00395-005-0521-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ghadge SK, Mühlstedt S, Ozcelik C, Bader M. SDF-1alpha as a therapeutic stem cell homing factor in myocardial infarction. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;129:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wynn RF, Hart CA, Corradi-Perini C, O'Neill L, Evans CA, Wraith JE, et al. A small proportion of mesenchymal stem cells strongly expresses functionally active CXCR4 receptor capable of promoting migration to bone marrow. Blood. 2004;104:2643–2645. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Honczarenko M, Le Y, Swierkowski M, Ghiran I, Glodek AM, Silberstein LE. Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1030–41. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Cheng Z, Ou L, Zhou X, Li F, Jia X, Zhang Y, et al. Targeted migration of mesenchymal stem cells modified with CXCR4 gene to infarcted myocardium improves cardiac performance. Mol Ther. 2008;16:571–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Zhang D, Fan GC, Zhou X, Zhao T, Pasha Z, Xu M, et al. Over-expression of CXCR4 on mesenchymal stem cells augments myoangiogenesis in the infarcted myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44:281–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Xie J, Wang H, Song T, Wang Z, Li F, Ma J, et al. Tanshinone IIA and astragaloside IV promote the migration of mesenchymal stem cells by up-regulation of CXCR4. Protoplasma. 2013;250:521–30. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Oesterle A, Laufs U, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statins on the cardiovascular system. Circ Res. 2017;120:229–243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sirtori CR. The pharmacology of statins. Pharmacol Res. 2014;88:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schaefer EJ, McNamara JR, Tayler T, Daly JA, Gleason JL, Seman LJ, et al. Comparisons of effects of statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) on fasting and postprandial lipoproteins in patients with coronary heart disease versus control subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:31–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Landmesser U, Engberding N, Bahlmann FH, Schaefer A, Wiencke A, Heineke A, et al. Statin-induced improvement of endothelial progenitor cell mobilization, myocardial neovascularization, left ventricular function, and survival after experimental myocardial infarction requires endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2004;110:1933–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Song L, Yang YJ, Dong QT, Qian HY, Gao RL, Qiao SB, et al. Atorvastatin enhance efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells treatment for swine myocardial infarction via activation of nitric oxide synthase. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Leone AM, Rutella S, Bonanno G, Abbate A, Rebuzzi AG, Giovannini S, et al. Mobilization of bone marrow-derived stem cells after myocardial infarction and left ventricular function. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1196–204. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 43.Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1495–504. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gangaraju VK, Lin H. MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:116–125. doi: 10.1038/nrm2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kartha RV, Subramanian S. MicroRNAs in cardiovascular diseases: biology and potential clinical applications. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010;3:256–270. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9172-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Spinello I, Quaranta MT, Paolillo R, Pelosi E, Cerio AM, Saulle E, et al. Differential hypoxic regulation of the microRNA-146a/CXCR4 pathway in normal and leukemic monocytic cells: impact on response to chemotherapy. Haematologica. 2015;100:1160–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Quaranta MT, Olivetta E, Sanchez M, Spinello I, Paolillo R, Arenaccio C, et al. miR-146a controls CXCR4 expression in a pathway that involves PLZF and can be used to inhibit HIV-1 infection of CD4(+) T lymphocytes. Virology. 2015;478:27–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Spinello I, Quaranta MT, Riccioni R, Riti V, Pasquini L, Boe A, et al. MicroRNA-146a and AMD3100, two ways to control CXCR4 expression in acute myeloid leukemias. Blood Cancer J. 2011;1:e26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]





