Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2021 Sep 15;8(9):210474. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210474

Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of a wet-collection syntype demonstrates the importance of type material as genetic resource for lantern shark taxonomy (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae)

Nicolas Straube 1,, Michaela Preick 2, Gavin J P Naylor 3, Michael Hofreiter 2
PMCID: PMC8441122  PMID: 34540250

Abstract

After initial detection of target archival DNA of a 116-year-old syntype specimen of the smooth lantern shark, Etmopterus pusillus, in a single-stranded DNA library, we shotgun-sequenced additional 9 million reads from this same DNA library. Sequencing reads were used for extracting mitochondrial sequence information for analyses of mitochondrial DNA characteristics and reconstruction of the mitochondrial genome. The archival DNA is highly fragmented. A total of 4599 mitochondrial reads were available for the genome reconstruction using an iterative mapping approach. The resulting genome sequence has 12 times coverage and a length of 16 741 bp. All 37 vertebrate mitochondrial loci plus the control region were identified and annotated. The mitochondrial NADH2 gene was subsequently used to place the syntype haplotype in a network comprising multiple E. pusillus samples from various distant localities as well as sequences from a morphological similar species, the shortfin smooth lantern shark Etmopterus joungi. Results confirm the almost global distribution of E. pusillus and suggest E. joungi to be a junior synonym of E. pusillus. As mitochondrial DNA often represents the only available reference information in non-model organisms, this study illustrates the importance of mitochondrial DNA from an aged, wet collection type specimen for taxonomy.

Keywords: museum specimens, archival DNA, deep-sea sharks, Etmopterus pusillus, Etmopterus joungi, taxonomy

1. Introduction

Type material deposited in museum collections is generally essential for taxonomic purposes. Fixation and preservation, especially in wet collections, damages DNA to a degree that these samples are rarely available for standard DNA sequencing analysis. However, recent methodological advances show that archival DNA from museum wet collection specimens is widely accessible by the application of ancient DNA methods (e.g. [14]).

In scientific ichthyological collections, specimen preservation in 75% ethanol commonly causes DNA sequence damage. Our recent increase in taxonomic knowledge partially fuelled by DNA barcoding [5], for example, often results in pending taxonomic questions, where type material DNA sequence information is crucial to answer these. Especially mitochondrial DNA is of major interest due to growing reference databases as a source for species delimitation based on DNA sequence differences.

Deep-sea shark taxonomy is a vivid example of challenges arising with increased sampling activities where new sequence information is generated producing new taxonomic questions. One group of focus are the lantern sharks (Etmopteridae), where several new species were described recently (e.g. [69]) and new DNA sequence information is also available (e.g. [10]).

Etmopteridae are the most species-rich shark family with 54 species described in four genera [11]. The species-rich genus Etmopterus, containing 45 species [11], is subdivided into four monophyletic subgroups: the E. spinax, E. gracilispinis, E. pusillus and E. lucifer clades [12].

Despite their worldwide distribution and species diversity, their phylogenetic relationships have not been studied extensively at the species level. Exact distribution ranges are often poorly known due to the scarcity of specimens available, or a lack of comparative studies that incorporate samples from large geographical areas. While some species appear localized, such as E. lailae Ebert, Papastamatiou, Kajiura & Wetherbee, 2017 or E. marshae Ebert & Van Hees, 2018, others are widespread, for example, E. granulosus (Günther 1880) or E. viator Straube, 2011 [1315]. Given morphological similarities between closely related species and a lack of documentation of morphological changes throughout ontogeny and/or differences between the sexes, the geographical origin of a sample is often relied upon to distinguish among congeners that are morphologically similar.

The smooth lantern shark, Etmopterus pusillus (Lowe, 1839), typifies challenges outlined above. As its common name indicates, it is characterized by smooth skin, a feature caused by block-like rather than the typical tooth-like dermal denticles, a rare feature among etmopterids in general and within the E. pusillus clade only shared by E. joungi Knuckey et al. 2011 [16] and the more distantly related blurred smooth lantern shark, Etmopterus bigelowi Shirai & Tachikawa 1993 [10,12,17]. The smooth lantern shark was originally described from Madeira in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. After its description in 1839, morphologically similar specimens were reported from numerous geographically distant locations far from the type locality, suggesting the species was widespread. Shirai & Tachikawa [18] were the first to explore the taxonomic status of the morphologically similar specimens. These authors described a new species, E. bigelowi and commented on the distribution range of E. pusillus as occurring almost globally by declaring the Northwest Pacific species E. frontimaculatus Pietschmann 1907 as a junior synonym to E. pusillus. In 2011, however, Knuckey et al. [16] described a morphologically similar species from the Northwest Pacific (Taiwan), the shortfin smooth lantern shark E. joungi. Later studies based on the analyses of mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (NADH2) gene sequences showed that mitochondrial haplotypes of E. pusillus from both the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean mix along with specimens identified as E. joungi from Taiwan [10]. The authors suggested that the species status of E. joungi be reviewed to clarify whether E. joungi represented a subpopulation of E. pusillus or indeed a distinct species. Here, we analyse data using an ancient DNA approach to sequence archival mitochondrial DNA of one of the syntypes of E. pusillus collected in 1903 in the Northwest Pacific off Japan, which represents a specimen of the former type series of E. frontimaculatus.

In this study, we reconstruct the full mitochondrial genome of the 116-year-old ethanol-preserved type specimen with an unknown fixation history from shotgun short-read sequences. Further, we use sequence information from the mitochondrial NADH2 gene for placing the syntype haplotype in a phylogenetic network of a broader sampling of E. pusillus and E. joungi NADH2 sequences. We use the sequence information to estimate the haplotype diversity from both species and discuss the distribution range of E. pusillus.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Mitochondrial genome reconstruction of the E. pusillus syntype museum specimen

Tissue from the syntype was sampled during a research visit by N.S. to the Museum of Natural History (MNH) in Vienna, Austria, in 2017. The syntype series comprises eight specimens catalogued with three collection lot numbers, i.e. NMW-78526, NMW-65832 and NMW-61473. The tissue sample analysed herein was dissected from specimen NMW-78526-15. Muscle tissue (67.7 mg) was removed by MNH staff with a sterile scalpel and tweezers and kept in the original preservation fluid until DNA extraction. The specimen was originally collected in 1903 off Yokohama (Japan) in the Northwest Pacific (figure 1). By the time of analysis in 2019, it was 116 years old. Details on its fixation and preservation history are unknown, but we assume that it was preserved as a wet collection specimen in supposedly diluted ethanol since it arrived at the museum.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overview of sampling locations.

Due to the age and preservation of the syntype specimen, DNA was extracted, and a single-stranded library constructed for this specimen, described in detail in Straube, Lyra et al. [4]. In brief, Straube, Lyra et al. [4] applied the Guanidine treatment DNA extraction approach modified from [1921] using the 67.7 mg of muscle tissue. Thereafter, DNA fragments were converted into a single-stranded DNA library following the protocol in Gansauge & Meyer [22]. Library fragment size was checked using an Agilent Tapestation®. DNA extraction and library preparation were conducted in a dedicated historical DNA laboratory at the University of Potsdam following the recommendations in Fulton & Shapiro [23]. The library was test-sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq® instrument with 1 758 548 75 bp single-end reads using the 500/550 High Output v. 2.5 (75 cycles, Illumina 20024906) kit and custom sequencing primers [24]. Reads were quality filtered and trimmed using cutadapt [25]. The presence of target DNA was checked with Fastqscreen [26] using a set of reference genomes to evaluate portions of both contaminant and target DNA. The Etmopterus spinax (Linnaeus, 1758) transcriptome derived from Delroisse et al. [27] and the E. pusillus mitochondrial genome from Chen et al. [28] were used as custom target references for checking for target DNA in the syntype DNA library (see Straube, Lyra et al. [4] for further details).

Using these data, we started an initial experiment with Mitobim [29], where we first assembled reads using MIRA [30] and then iteratively mapped reads. The E. pusillus mitochondrial genome (KU892588; [28]) was used as a seed for mapping in the first iteration. Subsequently, we counted the number of reconstructed sites in the last iteration. For an approximate estimate of mitochondrial nucleotides present in the test sequencing data, we divided the number of recovered mitochondrial nucleotides by the total number of raw reads from test sequencing (1 758 548 reads) resulting in the theoretical number of mitochondrial nucleotides per read. Dividing the length of the mitochondrial genome of E. pusillus (16 729 bp; [28]) by the mitochondrial nucleotides per read allowed us to estimate the number of further reads necessary to be able to reconstruct the full mitochondrial genome sequence, guiding subsequent deeper sequencing of the DNA library.

Reads with a minimum length of 25 bp were trimmed allowing for an overlap of 1 bp between read and adapter. To reconstruct the full mitochondrial genome sequence from the trimmed reads, we proceeded as described above for the test sequencing reads: first we assembled the reads de novo using MIRA. Thereafter, we used the iterative mapping approach in Mitobim. We allowed Mitobim a maximum of 10 iterations and lowered the k-mer size from the default of 31 to 21 after experiments to optimize the k-mer size. Geneious R7 (https://www.geneious.com) was used to compute the coverage by importing the .caf files resulting from the Mitobim analysis and annotate the mitochondrial genome based on the available annotation from KU892588 [28]. To align the reconstructed mitochondrial genome sequence from the syntype to the reference Genbank mitochondrial sequence, we used the Geneious consensus aligner. We estimated archival mitochondrial DNA damage patterns from the mitochondrial readpool used for reconstructing the mitochondrial genome in the last iteration of Mitobim. First, BWA [31] was used to map these reads to the Etmopterus pusillus reference KU892588. Samtools [32] was subsequently used to remove low mapping quality reads and PCR duplicates. The resulting file was input to Mapdamage v. 2.0.7 [33], which was run under default settings to estimate the damage patterns of the archival mitochondrial syntype DNA. The same set of reads was further used to map reads back to the reconstructed mitochondrial genome of the syntype using BWA to test if reads can be successfully and unambiguously mapped. BWA was run as described for the total sum of reads. Samstat v. 1.5.1 [34] was used to compare the percentage of mapped reads used in Mitobim and mapping all reads to the reconstructed mitochondrial genome sequence of the syntype.

MITOS ([35]; http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py) was used to gain further annotation information such as plus and minus strand loci coordinates. Further, it was used to check the arrangement of genes on the mitochondrial genome.

2.2. NADH2 sequencing of E. pusillus and E. joungi fresh material

In the course of the Chondrichthyan Tree of Life project (Ctol, https://sharksrays.org/), numerous samples of Etmopterus were collected on diverse field trips or contributed by museum tissue collections for sequencing the NADH2 gene in an approach to create a mitochondrial reference library at the species level. Sampling locations are shown in figure 1. At least one specimen of each putative species was identified morphologically by contributors of Ctol and deposited in a scientific collection [17]. Haplotypes of these vouchered specimens were used as taxonomic references for further species assignations of NADH2 haplotypes of samples contributed to Ctol. DNA was extracted from fresh tissue samples using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA). Extracted genomic DNA was used to amplify the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 gene of the mitochondrial DNA via PCR. A single set of universal primers [36] designed to bind to the ASN and ILE tRNA regions of the mitochondrial genome was used to amplify the target fragment. PCR reactions were carried out in 25 µl volume comprising 0.3 µM primers, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTP each, 1× Ex Taq buffer, 0.25 U Takara Ex Taq (Takara, Mountain View, CA, USA) and 50–100 ng template DNA. The reaction mixture was denatured at 94°C for 3 min. Thereafter, 35 PCR cycles were carried out comprising denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 48°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 90 s. PCR products were purified with ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA), and bi-directionally Sanger sequenced using BigDye® Terminator chemistry on an ABI 3730xl genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems®, Life Technologies, Grand Isand, USA), at Retrogen Inc. Custom DNA Sequencing Facility (San Diego, CA, USA). DNA sequences were edited using Geneious® Pro v. 6.1.7 (Biomatters Ltd Auckland, New Zealand). The edited sequences were translated to amino acids and aligned with corresponding NADH2 sequences from representatives of closely related species using the MAFFT [37,38] module within Geneious. The aligned amino acid sequences were translated back in frame to their original nucleotide sequences, to yield a nucleotide alignment. The full protein-coding alignment was 1044 bp in length.

2.3. NADH2 haplotype network

To place the syntype haplotype in a larger framework of E. pusillus and E. joungi sequences, we aligned the full mitochondrial genome syntype sequence to an alignment of mitochondrial NADH2 sequences derived from the Chondrichthyan Tree of Life project comprising 36 specimens identified as E. pusillus and E. joungi from different localities as well as a single NADH2 sequence of the sister species of both taxa, Etmopterus bigelowi (table 1). Thereafter, the NADH2 sequence was extracted from the mitochondrial genome syntype sequence and re-aligned to the NADH2 sequence alignment. As described in §2.2, the full alignment was translated to amino acids to check for stop codons and backtranslated in frame.

Table 1.

Overview of samples used for the NADH2 haplotype network reconstruction.

genus species locality tissue sample number accession (Genbank/Dryad) source
Etmopterus joungi Northwest Pacific, Taiwan (Ta-Shi fish market) GN10144 KF927858 Straube et al. [10]
Etmopterus joungi Northwest Pacific, Taiwan (Ta-Shi fish market) GN10145 KF927859 Straube et al. [10]
Etmopterus joungi Northwest Pacific, Taiwan (Ta-Shi fish market) GN10140 KF927857 Straube et al. [10]
Etmopterus joungi Northwest Pacific, Taiwan (Ta-Shi fish market) GN10148 MZ395856 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6543 MZ395857 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6548 MZ395858 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6550 MZ395859 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6552 JQ518964 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6555 MZ395860 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6563 MZ395861 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Azores, Portugal GN6578 MZ395862 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN6603 MZ395863 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN6620 MZ395864 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Morocco GN12128 MZ395877 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3772 MZ395871 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3771 KF861692 Straube et al. [15]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3770 MZ395872 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3769 MZ395873 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3767 MZ395874 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3766 KF861691 Straube et al. [15]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN3765 MZ395875 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Atlantic, Portugal GN6624 MZ395878 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11335 MZ395866 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11334 MZ395867 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11331 MZ395868 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11330 MZ395869 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11329 MZ395870 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN2614 MZ395876 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN2613 MZ395879 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN4951 MZ395880 Naylor et al. [17]
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN11328 MZ395881 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Southwest Pacific, New South Wales, Australia GN7396 MZ395884 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Pacific, Suruga Bay, Japan GN7426 MZ395865 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Pacific, Suruga Bay, Japan GN7436 MZ395882 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Pacific, Suruga Bay, Japan GN7435 MZ395883 this study
Etmopterus pusillus Northeast Pacific, Yokohama, Japan (Syntype) Epusisyn https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd51c5b59 this study
Etmopterus pusillus East China Sea na KU892588 this study
Etmopterus bigelowi Mid-Atlantic GN5026 MZ395885 Naylor et al. [17]

PopART v. 1.7 [39] was used to reconstruct a haplotype network from the NADH2 sequences. PopART was run using the Median Joining inference under default settings using a provided trait file coding for locality information of samples.

3. Results

3.1. Syntype archival DNA

Using the test sequencing data from Straube, Lyra et al. [4] for the initial Mitobim analysis, 11 122 mitochondrial nucleotides were recovered after 13 iterations. Assuming a total mitochondrial genome sequence length of 16 729 bases (equalling the length of the reference mitochondrial genome KU892588 [28]), we estimated that a maximum of 13 940 833 reads would need to be sequenced for a minimum fivefold coverage of the mitochondrial genome given the preliminary data. To comply with this target, 9 901 517 additional reads were subsequently sequenced. After trimming, 8 188 491 reads were available for further analysis. The distribution of sequencing reads shows a high level of fragmentation with the majority of reads below a length of 50 bp (figure 2), while the average insert size of the library is 30.5 nucleotides. In combination with the trimmed test sequencing reads from Straube, Lyra et al. [4], a total of 8 970 773 trimmed reads for the reconstruction of the mitochondrial genome and further analysis were available.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Read length distribution of trimmed reads (N = 8 188 491) derived from the E. pusillus syntype specimen. The majority of reads are below 50 bp in length.

3.2. Syntype mitochondrial DNA and genome reconstruction

After assembling trimmed reads with Mitobim, the full mitochondrial genome was recovered from a total of 4559 mitochondrial reads after three iterations. The analysis resulted in a single consensus sequence of 16 741 bp with an average per base coverage of 12.12 exceeding our estimates from the preliminary test sequencing data (table 2 and figure 3). Mapping reads used for mitochondrial genome reconstruction by Mitobim back to the reconstructed syntype mitochondrial genome showed that 3808 (81.8%) of 4654 reads mapped; 80.5% of reads have a mapping quality of greater than or equal to 30. Mapping all available 8 188 491 trimmed reads derived from shotgun sequencing onto the reconstructed mitochondrial genome resulted in a similar number (3850) of reads mapping to the reconstructed genome sequence.

Table 2.

Summary statistics for the reconstructed mitochondrial genome sequence of the E. pusillus syntype NMW-78526-15.

length (bp) GC content (%) A (%) C (%) G (%) T (%) N (%) average per base coverage
16 741 37.2 31.1 22.8 14.3 31.5 0.4 12.12

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Per base coverage plot of the E. pusillus syntype NMW-78526-15 mitochondrial genome. Horizontal line shows the median.

Estimated damage patterns of the archival mitochondrial DNA show an elevated rate of cytosine to thymine substitutions at the 5′ end of reads indicating cytosine deamination. The level of deamination is below 5% (figure 4). Annotation of the mitochondrial genome with Geneious allowed all coding genes, 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA and tRNAs to be identified, as well as defining the control region. Table 2 shows the summary statistics for the mitochondrial genome sequence. Based on the reference annotation from Chen et al. [28], we confirm that the syntype mitochondrial genome comprises the complete set of 37 vertebrate mitochondrial genes, i.e. 13 protein-coding genes, two ribosomal RNAs and 22 transfer RNAs as well as the control region. Most loci were encoded on the H strand except for eight tRNAs (trnQ, trnA, trnN, trnC, trnY, trnS2, trnE, trnP) and a single protein-coding gene, NAD6. The sequence of loci is shown in figure 5.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

DNA damage patterns of the 116-year-old E. pusillus syntype archival mitochondrial DNA. Sequencing reads in bottom panel show increased C to T substitutions (red) at the 5′ ends. Blue: G to A substitutions. Grey: all other substitutions. Upper four plots (blue, green, black and red) show base frequencies of inside and outside of reads (inside reads indicated by brackets).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Annotated circular mitochondrial genome sequence of the E. pusillus syntype NMW-78526-15. Annotation reference: GenBank accession KU892588 [28].

3.3. Haplotype network

After manual editing of the NADH2 alignment in Geneious, 1044 sites each of 38 samples in total were available for the analysis (table 1). PopART detected 27 haplotypes with a nucleotide diversity pi of 0.004. There are 100 segregating sites and 22 parsimony-informative characters. The network visualized in figure 6 shows two closely related haplotype groups, one comprising haplotypes from the Northeast Atlantic as well as the Southwest Pacific, while the other one includes haplotypes from the North and Southwest Pacific including the syntype of E. pusillus and E. joungi specimens. Both groups are separated by two mutational steps. The syntype haplotype is identical to an E. joungi haplotype as well as a Northwest Pacific E. pusillus haplotype. The sister species, E. bigelowi, is separated from the E. pusillus and E. joungi cluster by 71 mutational steps (figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Haplotype network of NADH2 sequences derived from E. pusillus, E. joungi, the E. pusillus syntype specimen as well as E. bigelowi. Numbers in parentheses indicate mutational steps.

4. Discussion

4.1. Syntype mitochondrial DNA recovery

As previously described for this and other wet collection samples [4], the fragmentation level of the sequenced archival DNA is high, with an average fragment length of 42.68 bp indicating substantial degradation of the DNA (figure 2). The exact causes of this drastic and relatively rapid degradation remain unknown; however, the storage conditions in an ethanol solution probably fuelled fragmentation through hydrolysis.

The ancient DNA approach applied to the sample in Straube, Lyra et al. [4] was successful as target DNA was detected. Our initial iterative mapping experiment with Mitobim showed that enough mitochondrial reads should be recovered with approximately 10 million further shotgun-sequencing reads which proved successful. The damage estimates of the recovered mitochondrial DNA are comparable to findings in other wet collections samples [4], i.e. deamination is present but to a limited degree (figure 4). Recovering the full mitochondrial genome from shotgun sequencing saves time-consuming and costly target capture approaches, which demand additional laboratory working time besides prior bait design and production. Test sequencing of libraries using a limited number of reads as a first step to check for target DNA and contamination levels has also been successfully applied as an adequate strategy for sequencing dry museum and herbarium specimens (e.g. [40]). Our subsequent approach allowed for generating key reference data for answering pending taxonomic questions.

4.2. Distribution of Etmopterus pusillus and taxonomic implications

Within Etmopteridae, large distribution ranges are known for several species [1315]. Our results support the notion by Shirai & Tachikawa [18] that E. pusillus is a widespread species. In fact, it is distributed almost circumglobally. The lack of molecular differences across vast geographical distances is striking (figure 6). Indeed, Southwest Pacific mitochondrial haplotypes cluster together with both Northeast Atlantic (close to the type locality of E. pusillus) and Northwest Pacific haplotypes. Substantial long-distance dispersal potential has been suggested as an explanation to account for the lack of population structure in several deep-sea shark species [4144], including Etmopterus species [14].

Mitochondrial sequence divergence is often used for species delimitation in sharks (e.g. [10,17]). Admixture of mitochondrial haplotypes is, therefore, impacting taxonomy. North Pacific mitochondrial haplotypes of the Pacific sleeper shark Somniosus pacificus Bigelow & Schröder, 1944 are also found in specimens assigned to the Antarctic sleeper shark Somniosus antarcticus Whitley, 1939, for example, which questions the taxonomic status of S. antarcticus [41,45,46]. The results presented herein also impact the taxonomy of E. joungi. Our haplotype network shows that the E. pusillus syntype shares a haplotype with a specimen identified previously as E. joungi in [10] making a distinction of the two species with mitochondrial NADH2 sequence data impossible. This mitochondrial gene sequence, however, was demonstrated to be highly diagnostic for species-level distinction in chondrichthyan fishes including Etmopterus [10,17]. The expectation of monophyly is not met for E. joungi. In their description of E. joungi, Knuckey et al. [16] report on intraspecific geographical morphological variation within their comparative material of E. pusillus analysed. The detected morphological differences between E. pusillus and E. joungi in Knuckey et al. [16] may represent further intraspecific variation. We, therefore, suggest that E. joungi is a junior synonym of E. pusillus. Our DNA sequence-based results support the synonymy of E. frontimaculatus with E. pusillus, first suggested by Shirai & Tachikawa [18] based on morphological evidence.

Even though etmopterids are not directly targeted in fisheries, the shift of commercial fisheries to fishing grounds in deeper waters [47,48] poses a threat to slow-growing and late-maturing species with few offspring such as E. pusillus. Detailed information on the distribution ranges of such species is essential for precise taxonomic assessment and is the basis for correct evaluation for protection and management strategies. About E. pusillus, our results of an almost global marine distribution give hope for cautious optimism regarding its future. Since little is known about geographical ranges and population sizes of many shark species, especially deep-sea ones, filling these gaps in our knowledge is of prime importance, as only then, conservation efforts can be focused on those species that are under the greatest danger of extinction.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere thanks to Ernst Mikschi and Anja Palandacic at the Museum of Natural History in Vienna for the sampling opportunity of the E. pusillus syntype. Further, Axel Barlow, Stefanie Hartmann, Marianna Lyra, Isabella Stöger and Johanna Paijmans are acknowledged for advice regarding data analysis. Dave Ebert is thanked for discussion of taxonomic results. Three anonymous reviewers are thanked for constructive criticism.

Data accessibility

NADH2 sequence data analysed in this study are available in Genbank; see table 1 for accession numbers. Sequence data of the syntype are archived from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd51c5b59 [49].

Authors' contributions

N.S. and M.H. designed the study and analysed the data. N.S. and M.P. conducted laboratory work. G.J.P.N. provided NADH2 sequences for the network analysis. N.S. wrote and drafted the manuscript with contributions from all authors. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; project number 351649567 to N.S. and M.H. within the DFG SPP 1991 ‘Taxon-Omics’). This project was further supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), grant DEB-01132229 to G.J.P.N.

References

  • 1.Gansauge MT, Gerber T, Glocke I, Korlevic P, Lippik L, Nagel S, Riehl LM, Schmidt A, Meyer M. 2017Single-stranded DNA library preparation from highly degraded DNA using T4 DNA ligase. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e79. ( 10.1093/nar/gkx033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lyra ML, et al. 2020High-throughput DNA sequencing of museum specimens sheds light on the long-missing species of the Bokermannohyla claresignata group (Anura: Hylidae: Cophomantini). Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 190, 1-21. ( 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa033) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rancilhac L, et al. 2020Targeted-enrichment DNA sequencing from historical type material enables a partial revision of the Madagascar giant stream frogs (genus Mantidactylus). J. Nat. Hist. 54, 87-118. ( 10.1080/00222933.2020.1748243) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Straube N, Lyra MLet al. 2021Successful application of ancient DNA extraction and library construction protocols to museum wet collection specimens. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 2299-2315. ( 10.1111/1755-0998.13433) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007bold: the barcode of life data system (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 355-364. ( 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ebert DA, Leslie RW, Weigmann S. 2021Etmopterus brosei sp. nov.: a new lanternshark (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from the southeastern Atlantic and southwestern Indian oceans, with a revised key to the Etmopterus lucifer clade. Mar. Biodivers. 511-17. ( 10.1007/s12526-021-01173-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ebert DA, Papastamatious YP, Kajiura SM, Wetherbee BM. 2017Etmopterus lailae sp. nov., a new lanternshark (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Zootaxa 4237, 371-382. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.4237.2.10) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ebert DA, Van Hees KE. 2018Etmopterus marshae sp. nov, a new lanternshark (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from the Philippine Islands, with a revised key to the Etmopterus lucifer clade. Zootaxa 4508, 197-210. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.2.3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.White WT, Ebert DA, Mana RR, Corrigan S. 2017Etmopterus samadiae n. sp., a new lanternshark (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa 4244, 339-354. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.4244.3.3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Straube N, White WT, Ho H-C, Rochel E, Corrigan S, Li C, Naylor GJP. 2013A DNA sequence-based identification checklist for Taiwanese chondrichthyans. Zootaxa 3752, 256-278. ( 10.11646/zootaxa.3752.1.16) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pollerspöck J, Straube N. 2021Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali)—List of Valid Extant Species; List of Described Extant Species; Statistic, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 03/2021; ISSN: 2195-6499. See www.shark-references.com.
  • 12.Straube N, Iglésias SP, Sellos DY, Kriwet J, Schliewen UK. 2010Molecular phylogeny and node time estimation of bioluminescent lanternsharks (Elasmobranchii: Etmopteridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56, 905-917. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Straube N, Duhamel G, Gasco N, Kriwet J, Schliewen UK. 2011Description of a new deep-sea lanternshark Etmopterus viator sp. nov. (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from the Southern Hemisphere. In The Kerguelen Plateau, marine ecosystem and fisheries (eds Duhamel G, Welsford D), pp. 135-148. Paris, France: Société Française d́Ichtyologie. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Straube N, Kriwet J, Schliewen UK. 2011Cryptic diversity and species assignment of large lanternsharks of the Etmopterus spinax clade from the Southern Hemisphere, (Squaliformes, Etmopteridae). Zool. Scripta 40, 61-75. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00455.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Straube N, Rochel E, Corrigan S, Li C, Naylor GJP. 2015On the occurrence of the Southern Lanternshark, Etmopterus granulosus, off South Africa, with comments on the validity of E. compagnoi. Deep Sea Res. Part II 115, 11-17. ( 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.04.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knuckey JDS, Ebert DA, Burgess GH. 2011Etmopterus joungi n. sp., a new species of lanternshark (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) from Taiwan. Aqua, Int. J. Ichthyol. 17, 61-72. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Naylor GJP, Caira JN, Jensen K, Rosana KAM, White WT, Last PR. 2012A DNA sequence-based approach to the identification of shark and ray species and its implications for global elasmobranch diversity and parasitology. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 367, 1-262. ( 10.1206/754.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shirai S, Tachikawa H. 1993Taxonomic resolution of the Etmopterus pusillus species group (Elasmobranchii, Etmopteridae), with description of E. bigelowi, n. sp. Copeia 2, 483-495. ( 10.2307/1447149) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dabney J, et al. 2013Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultra short DNA fragments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15 758-15 763. ( 10.1073/pnas.1314445110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rohland N, Siedel H, Hofreiter M. 2004Nondestructive DNA extraction method for mitochondrial DNA analyses of museum specimens. Biotechniques 36, 814-821. ( 10.2144/04365ST05) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rohland N, Siedel H, Hofreiter M. 2010A rapid column-based ancient DNA extraction method for increased sample throughput. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 677-683. ( 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02824.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gansauge MT, Meyer M. 2013Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nat. Protoc. 8, 737-748. ( 10.1038/nprot.2013.038) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fulton TL, Shapiro B. 2019Setting up an ancient DNA laboratory. In Ancient DNA: methods in molecular biology, vol. 1963 (eds Shapiro B, Barlow A, Heintzman P, Hofreiter M, Paijmans J, Soares A), pp. 1-13. New York, NY: Humana Press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paijmans JLA, Baleka S, Henneberger K, Taron U, Trinks A, Westbury M, Barlow A. 2017Sequencing single-stranded libraries on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform. arXiv:1711.11004v1 [q-bio.OT].
  • 25.Martin M. 2011Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10-12. ( 10.14806/ej.17.1.200) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wingett SW, Andrews S. 2018FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Research 7, 1338. ( 10.12688/f1000research.15931.2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Delroisse J, Duchatelet L, Flammang P, Mallefet J. 2019De novo transcriptome analyses provide insights into opsin-based photoreception in the lanternshark Etmopterus spinax. PLoS ONE 13, E0209767. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0209767) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen H, Chen X, Gu X, Wan H, Chen X, Ai W. 2016The phylogenomic position of the smooth lanternshark Etmopterus pusillus (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) inferred from the mitochondrial genome. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 1, 341-342. ( 10.1080/23802359.2016.1172274) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. 2013Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e129. ( 10.1093/nar/gkt371) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chevreux B, Wetter T, Suhai S. 1999Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information. Comput. Sci. Biol. Proc. German Conf. Bioinform. (GCB) 99, 45-56. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H, Durbin R. 2009Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jónsson H, Ginolhac A, Schubert M, Johnson PLF, Orlando L. 2013mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics 29, 1682-1684. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt193) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lassmann T, Yoshihide H, Daub CO. 2010SAMStat: monitoring biases in next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 130-131. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq614) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013MITOS: improved de novo Metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 313-319. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Naylor GJP, Ryburn JA, Ferigo O, Lopez A. 2005Phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of modern elasmobranchs. In Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids and chimaeras (ed. Hamlett WC), pp. 1-25. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma KI, Miyata T. 2002MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acid Res. 30, 3059-3066. ( 10.1093/nar/gkf436) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acid Res. 33, 511-518. ( 10.1093/nar/gki198) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leigh JW, Bryant D. 2015PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110-1116. ( 10.1111/2041-210X.12410) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zeng CX, Hollingsworth PM, Yang J, He Z-S, Zhang Z-R, Li D-Z, Jang J-B. 2018Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics. Plant Methods 14, 43. ( 10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murray BW, Wang JY, Yang SC, Stevens JD, Fisk A, Svavarsson J. 2008Mitochondrial cytochrome b variation in sleeper sharks (Squaliformes: Somniosidae). Mar. Biol. 153, 1015-1022. ( 10.1007/s00227-007-0871-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Veríssimo A, McDowell JR, Graves JE. 2012Genetic population structure and connectivity in a commercially exploited and wide-ranging deepwater shark, the leafscale gulper (Centrophorus squamosus). Mar. Freshwater Res. 63, 505-512. ( 10.1071/MF11237) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Veríssimo A, McDowell JR, Graves JE. 2011Population structure of a deep-water squaloid shark, the Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 555-563. ( 10.1093/icesjms/fsr003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Walter RP, et al. 2017Origins of the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus): impacts of ice-olation and introgression. Ecol. Evol. 7, 8113-8125. ( 10.1002/ece3.3325) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Edwards JE, et al. 2019Advancing research for the management of long-lived species: a case study on the Greenland shark. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 1-87. ( 10.3389/fmars.2019.00087) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yano K, Stevens JD, Compagno LJV. 2004A review of the systematics of the sleeper shark genus Somniosus with redescriptions of Somniosus (Somniosus) antarcticus and Somniosus (Rhinoscymnus) longus (Squaliformes: Somniosidae). Ichthyol. Res. 51, 360-373. ( 10.1007/s10228-004-0244-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Morato T, Watson R, Pitcher TJ, Pauly D. 2006Fishing down the deep. Fish Fisheries 7, 24-34. ( 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rogers AD, Gianni M.. 2010The implementation of UNGA resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 in the management of deep-sea fisheries on the high seas. Report prepared for the Deep-Sea Conservation Coalition, 97 p. London, UK: International Programme on the State of the Ocean.
  • 49.Straube N. 2021Data underlying RSOS-210474: Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of a wet-collection syntype demonstrates the importance of type material as genetic resource for Lantern Shark taxonomy (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae). Dryad Digital Repository ( 10.5061/dryad.kd51c5b59) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Straube N. 2021Data underlying RSOS-210474: Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of a wet-collection syntype demonstrates the importance of type material as genetic resource for Lantern Shark taxonomy (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae). Dryad Digital Repository ( 10.5061/dryad.kd51c5b59) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

NADH2 sequence data analysed in this study are available in Genbank; see table 1 for accession numbers. Sequence data of the syntype are archived from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd51c5b59 [49].


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES