Abstract
Tracks and trackways of newborns, calves and juveniles attributed to straight-tusked elephants were found in the MIS 5 site (Upper Pleistocene) known as the Matalascañas Trampled Surface (MTS) at Huelva, SW Spain. Evidence of a snapshot of social behaviour, especially parental care, can be determined from the concentration of elephant tracks and trackways, and especially from apparently contemporaneous converging trackways, of small juvenile and larger, presumably young adult female tracks. The size frequency of the tracks enabled us to infer body mass and age distribution of the animals that crossed the MTS. Comparisons of the MTS demographic frequency with the morphology of the fore- and hind limbs of extant and fossil proboscideans shed light into the reproductive ecology of the straight-tusked elephant, Palaeloxodon antiquus. The interdune pond habitat appeared to have been an important water and food resource for matriarchal herds of straight-tusked elephants and likely functioned as a reproductive habitat, with only the rare presence of adult and older males in the MTS. The preservation of this track record in across a paleosol surface, although heavily trampled by different animals, including Neanderthals, over a short time frame, permitted an exceptional view into short-term intraspecific trophic interactions occurring in the Last Interglacial coastal habitat. Therefore, it is hypothesized that Neanderthals visited MTS for hunting or scavenging on weakened or dead elephants, and more likely calves.
Subject terms: Palaeontology, Palaeoecology
Introduction
The straight-tusked elephant Palaeoloxodon antiquus Falconer & Cautley is among the most powerful proboscideans that has ever lived, and one of the most robust of the Elephantinae species, with very wide heads carrying extremely long tusks. Based on well-preserved skeletons, estimates of maximum shoulder height varies from 300 to 420 cm and body mass from 4.5–5.5 to 13 tonnes for females and males, respectively1. Recent genetic analyses place Palaeoloxodon antiquus as closely related to the more modest African forest elephant Loxodonta cyclotis Matschie2. According to Palkoupoulou3, straight-tusked elephants descended from a mixture of three ancestral populations related to the African elephant Loxodonta africana Blumenbach, the woolly mammoth Mammuthus primigenius Blumenbach and the present-day African forest elephant L. cyclotis. Palaeoloxodon antiquus dispersed rapidly in Europe around 1 million years ago4,5 replacing the southern mammoth Mammuthus meridionalis Nesti. Palaeoloxodon antiquus, M. trongontheri Pohlig and M. primigenius were the proboscideans coexisting in Europe between latest Early Pleistocene to about MIS 3; the steppe mammoth became extinct in Europe after Middle Pleistocene4. However, only very rarely they were found together in the same latitudes, the forest-browser P. antiquus being common in interglacial periods and the grazer mammoths typical of glacial steppes4. This is especially evident in the southernmost latitudes of Europe.
In the Iberian Peninsula, the straight-tusked elephant prevailed in Mediterranean evergreen woodland which was widespread during the interglacial phases, such as the Last Interglacial5. This is especially true in southern Spain, where P. antiquus replaced M. trogontherii during Middle Pleistocene6. In response to climate cooling after the MIS 5a, and the consequent dramatic vegetation changes throughout Europe, populations of P. antiquus were progressively reduced until left only in refugia, mainly but not exclusively in southern Europe4,5,7, including southernmost Iberia. On the other hand, the cold-adapted Mammuthus primigenius only occasionally extended its maximum geographical presence towards the south of the peninsula during the coldest periods of the Late Pleistocene8, reaching El Padul basin at Granada (Southern Spain), during the Last Glacial Period (MIS 3a). Palaeoloxodon antiquus had its last vestiges in the same period and the same biogeographical area4,9–11.
The functional morphology of their bones, their ancient DNA, the isotopic composition of their teeth, or even evidence of predation (including by hominin hunting) are fundamental data to understand the biology of elephants. However, for behavioural and ecological interpretations, the track fossil record provides substantial in situ and in vivo information usually not obtainable from the skeletal record12. Proboscidean-type tracks and trackways are found occasionally in the fossil record worldwide and they provide valuable and, sometimes, the only possible information about behaviour, locomotor characteristics and social structure of their trackmakers13.
An Upper Pleistocene stratigraphic surface with vertebrate tracks and trackways, named the ‘Matalascañas Trampled Surface’ (MTS)14, has been exposed at the base of the ‘El Asperillo’ cliff (section 37°01′07″ N–6°35′17″ W to 37°00′36″ N–6°34′23″ W) near Torre de la Higuera at the municipality of Almonte, urban area of Matalascañas, in the vicinities of Doñana National Park (Matalascañas, Huelva, SW Spain). A significant part of MTS located in the mesotidal range was uncovered as a result of the 2020 spring storm surges (Fig. 1). The exposure was ephemeral since most of the time the coastal area is mantled by > 1.5 m beach sand (Fig. S1). The MTS has been identified as occurring at the base of the informal lithostratigraphic unit AU1, according to the local stratigraphic section, which was deposited during the MIS 5 (dated by OSL as 106 ± 19 ky15). Neto de Carvalho et al.15,16 pointed out that this trampled surface developed within the paleosol17, records an exceptional single event where tracks and trackways of different vertebrates ascribed to Artiodactyla (Bos primigenius?, Cervus elaphus and Sus scrofa), Elephantidae (Palaeoloxodon antiquus), Canidae (Canis lupus) and waterbirds (Anserinae and Charadrii) were preserved. Most recently, Mayoral et al.18 described Neanderthal footprints, some of them clearly located in the MTS. The MTS ichnoassociation is characterized by the ichnogenera Cervipeda Vialov/Bifipides Demathieu et al. and Suidichnus galani Neto de Carvalho et al. as artiodactyl traces, the ichnogenus Probiscipeda for P. antiquus traces, the ichnogenus Hominipes for Neanderthal footprints, the ichnogenus Canipeda Panin and Avram for wolf traces and, the bird traces could belong to the ichnogenus Presbyorniformipes Yang et al., in addition to other tetradactyl ichnogenera still not studied in detail14,16. The MTS is interpreted, from the sedimentological point of view, as a hydromorphic paleosol with abundant rhizoliths developed during the last interglacial period17, in a temporarily exposed interdunal area, similar to current examples in the Doñana National Park. Ferriargillan coating and the first eolian rippled sands of AU1 may have been responsible for the long-term preservation of the MTS traces from erosion16. However, ever present intertidal erosion upon poorly cemented fine- and clayey sandstones clearly affects the tracks and rhizoliths when exposed from the beach sand cover, blurring morphological features after few tides and deepening the trace fossils. This is clearly evident by the many undetermined weathered structures and potholes described as hominin footprints18.
Nevertheless, non-weathered exposures of MTS provide a unique sedimentary record of the coastal habitat with abundant and well-preserved proboscidean tracks and a few discernible trackways. This important finding raises the question about the ecological reasons for the presence of Palaeoloxodon antiquus, likely in herd, in the coastal environments of SW Spain during the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, as well as the coeval presence of Neanderthals. The MTS reveals new data on Palaeoloxodon antiquus locomotor behavior, social group structure and ecology based on age frequency estimates from tracks, and possible trophic interactions. Age estimation and population age structure of P. antiquus from footprint dimensions follows methodologies currently used to study elephant populations in Africa and Asia. In particular, the well-preserved small proboscidean footprints preserved in MTS show, for the first time, the presence of calves and juveniles, some younger than 2 months to 2 years of age, with important implications for understanding the reproductive ecology of P. antiquus.
The ichnological record of proboscideans
The ichnological description of the proboscidean tracks and trackways present in the MTS can be found below, and in the supplementary Table S1 in comparison with the known trace fossil record. Proboscidean tracks are known from as early as the Late Eocene of Iran19 to the latest Pleistocene attributed to woolly mammoths20,21. They show for different groups of proboscideans rather similar morphological features, emphasizing the need for an ichnotaxonomic revision of the ichnogenus Proboscipeda. Irrespective of this, the size distribution of proboscidean tracks varies enormously, along the phylogeny, and even within the same population, when considering sexual dimorphism and ontogeny. The smallest footprint attributed to a woolly mammoth calf is 11 cm in length22 and the largest P. antiquus-related tracks may have reach over 70 cm 11. Lucas et al.22 proposed to apply the ichnogenus Proboscipeda Panin & Avram to all proboscidean fossil footprints. Proboscipeda is described as large oval to subcircular tracks, with large and flat sole surface either ornamented or smooth, three to five short and blunt toe impressions pointing anteriorly, and with deeper tracks impressing a noticeable marginal ridge (emended diagnosis by Aramayo et al.23). Manus impressions are more circular than the pes, which is common in proboscidean tracks and reflects subtle anatomic differences. The hindfoot is usually more plantigrade-like and the forefoot more digitigrade in functional posture, the fore limbs supporting around 60% of the body weight in extant elephants24. The number of toes may be indistinctly three to five, either in fore- and hindfeet, such as in extant elephants25. African elephants tend to have four toes on their forefeet while Asian elephants have five toes on the forefoot and four on the hindfoot (Panagiotopoulou et al.26, and references therein).
Results and discussion
The MTS proboscidean tracks and trackmakers
Rounded-to-elliptical tracks, with an axial length range from 9.6 to 54.5 cm (pes), were found mostly isolated and as manus-pes couples, or associated forming at least eight short trackways (see Table 1). They reveal good preservation in one 6-footprint trackway (see below), two converging trackways and some couples, showing anteriorly directed, wide, short and blunt toe impressions (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). Toe impressions are not commonly visible in elephant footprints9,13, (but see27), which attests to cases of exceptional preservation in Matalascañas tracks. Preservation as true tracks is identified through expulsion marginal rims (e.g., Fig. 4a, g) and possible ejecta (Fig. 3b,e). Large and flat sole surfaces sometimes show evidence of pockmarks23 (Fig. 4f).
Table 1.
Track no | Manus Pes | Length (cm) | Width (cm) | Toe impressions | E.S.H. (cm) | E.B.M. (kg) | E.A. (years) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALVES (< 2 years) | |||||||
PAT/MTS/005 | P | 9.6 | 7.3 | 66 (m) | 70 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
56 (f) | 43 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/012x | M | 9.6 | 8.1 | 66 (m) | 70 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
56 (f) | 43 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/016 | M | 10 | 8.2 | 69 (m) | 79 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
58 (f) | 48 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/011a | M | 10.8 | 11.7 | 5 | 73 (m) | 93 (m) | < 1 (m) |
62 (f) | 58 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/012j | P | 11.3 | 9.4 | 76 (m) | 105 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
65 (f) | 67 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/008d | M | 13.8 | 13.7 | 4 | 91 (m) | 177 (m) | < 1 (m) |
78 (f) | 113 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/012a | P | 14.1 | 10.8 | 2–3 | 92 (m) | 182 (m) | < 1 (m) |
80 (f) | 122 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/011f | M | 14.2 | 11.5 | 92 (m) | 182 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
80 (f) | 122 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/007a | P | 14.6 | 10.5 | 3 | 95 (m) | 200 (m) | < 1 (m) |
83 (f) | 135 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/010f | M | 15 | 17 | 98 (m) | 219 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
85 (f) | 145 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/014 | P | 15.5 | 12 | 3 | 100 (m) | 232 (m) | < 1 (m) |
88 (f) | 160 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003k | M | 15.7 | 22.7 | 102 (m) | 246 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
89 (f) | 166 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/015x | M | 16 | 17 | 104 (m) | 260 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
92 (f) | 182 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/012c | P | 16.9 | 11.4 | 109 (m) | 298 (m) | < 1 (m) | |
95 (f) | 200 (f) | < 1 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/012b | P | 17.7 | 10.5 | 1 | 113 (m) | 331 (m) | 1 (m) |
100 (f) | 232 (f) | 1 (f) | |||||
JUVENILES (2–7 years) | |||||||
PAT/MTS/009 | M | 19.4 | 17 | 123 (m) | 424 (m) | 2 (m) | |
109 (f) | 298 (f) | 1 (f) | |||||
3PAT/MTS/011e | P | 20.6 | 15.3 | 3 | 130 (m) | 497 (m) | 3 (m) |
116 (f) | 357 (f) | 2 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003g | M | 21.8 | 23.8 | 137 (m) | 579 (m) | 2 (m) | |
122 (f) | 414 (f) | 2 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/010b | P | 22 | 17 | 138 (m) | 592 (m) | 3 (m) | |
123 (f) | 424 (f) | 3 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/008e | P | 22.6 | 15.1 | 3–4 | 142 (m) | 643 (m) | 3 (m) |
127 (f) | 465 (f) | 2 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003i | M | 23.4 | 23.1 | 146 (m) | 697 (m) | 3 (m) | |
131 (f) | 509 (f) | 3 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003a | M | 26.5 | 31 | 164 (m) | 976 (m) | 6 (m) | |
148 (f) | 725 (f) | 4 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/013 | P | 29.5 | 24 | 182 (m) | 1321 (m) | 7 (m) | |
164 (f) | 976 (f) | 7 (f) | |||||
ADOLESCENT (8–15 years) | |||||||
PAT/MTS/003p | M | 28.9 | 26.6 | 178 (m) | 1238 (m) | 8 (m) | |
161 (f) | 925 (f) | 6 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/005 | M | 30 | 31 | 185 (m) | 1385 (m) | 8 (m) | |
167 (f) | 1029 (f) | 7 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/001 | M | 30.9 | 33 | 5 | 190 (m) | 1497 (m) | 11 (m) |
172 (f) | 1121 (f) | 8 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/015a | M | 31.1 | 32 | 173 (f) | 1140 (f) | 8 (f) | |
PAT/MTS/003d | P | 33.3 | 24.5 | 204 (m) | 1840 (m) | 11 (m) | |
185 (f) | 1385 (f) | 9 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003b | P | 37.2 | 27.8 | 227 (m) | 2509 (m) | 14 (m) | |
206 (f) | 1893 (f) | 13 (f) | |||||
ADULTS (> 15 years) | |||||||
PAT/MTS/003j | P | 40.1 | 21.8 | 243 (m) | 3057 (m) | 17 (m) | |
222 (f) | 1121 (f) | 21 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003c | P | 40.7 | 29 | 247 (m) | 3026 (m) | 17 (m) | |
226 (f) | 2477 (f) | 26 (f) | |||||
PAT/MTS/003f | P | 45.8 | 30.7 | 277 (m) | 4471 (m) | 33 (m) | |
> 40 (f) | |||||||
PAT/MTS/004b | P | 51 | 36.5 | 3 | 307 (m) | 6027 (m) | < 60 (m) |
PAT/MTS/003q | P | 54.5 | 31.6 | 325 (m) | 7111 (m) | < 70 (m) |
Pes measurements were preferred in trackways but due to the relatively small sample of different sized-producers, manus dimensions were also included, especially in isolated tracks.
PAT/MTS—Palaeoloxodon antiquus tracks/Matalascañas Trampled Surface, a, b, c, …—representing tracks with different sizes/individuals in the same exposed area, M—manus, P—pes, E.S.H.—estimated shoulder height, E.B.M.—estimated body mass, E.A.—estimated age, m—male, f—female.
Irrespective of the track size, pes are elliptical to sub-rounded, with the length axis larger than the width and manus are circular or elliptical, with the width axis larger than the length (Figs. 2c and 4d, g for small and large size tracks, respectively). The safest way to differentiate between pes and manus is through the orientation of the track provided by the toe impressions, or by the orientation of the longer axis in trackways. When arranged in trackways, manus-pes couples show the typical elephantine gait, showing a short pace resulting from the fore- and hind feet on the same side swinging forward simultaneously below the body, as it is known from modern elephant gait28. In some cases, the partial impression of a pes overstepping the proximal part of a manus can be seen (Fig. 2c, g). Based on similar preservational style and opposing directions of movement without overlapping at the meeting point, a converging pair of trackways was apparently produced contemporaneously by an adult and a rather small juvenile. Sharp edges of the toe impressions indicate the presence of nails. These are found mostly in well preserved, smaller-sized tracks (Fig. 2a, d, e) because nails are commonly worn down in adult elephants and not always shown in their tracks13. These morphological features allow us to attribute the MTS trackways to the ichnospecies Proboscipeda panfamilia used previously for describing, among other tracksites, those tracks attributed confidently to the straight-tusked elephant Palaeoloxodon antiquus in the paleogeographical context of southern Europe11,14 (see supplementary Table S1).
Manus-pes couples, when showing overstepping, were not considered in Table 1 (Fig. 2c, g). Overstepping depends on the speed of walking; at faster speeds the overstepping is only partial or there is no overstepping; elephants maintain the footfall pattern at all speeds, shifting toward a calculated 25% phase offset between limbs as they increase speed28 (Fig. 2g). The smallest tracks usually do not show overstepping possibly because of the greater activity, with longer pace and stride lengths, demonstrated by calves and juveniles when compared to adults. Manus or pes showing a large width-length ratio (below 0.80–0.96 sensu25) were not considered for the estimates since they represent slippage.
Younger elephants have more pliable skin and musculature than adults. Also, the greater expansion and distribution of the weight in heavier adult animals is enough to reduce or negate toe impressions in some types of sediments, such as compacted substrates24,29. Interpreting the sedimentological data for the paleosol where MTS was developed15,17,30, suggests a drying clayey-sandy substrate14 that was still plastic enough to absorb the impact of the limbs during the locomotion of the elephants (presence of expulsion rims and absence of radial pressure cracks), and preserving, in many cases, the morphological details of the feet in good condition (Figs. 2a, 3, 4a; see Fig. 2h for a badly preserved example).
Ichnological inference about the height, body mass and age of Palaeoloxodon antiquus in the MTS
Several methods have been proposed for estimating the height at the shoulders for proboscideans, and the relationship between body mass and age with shoulder height 1,31,32. A linear relationship between foot length and shoulder height was confirmed by Lee and Moss33 from extant elephants and compared with fossil examples by Pasenko24. Pes length has been especially used in studies as an indicator of shoulder height21,34–36. Among Asian elephants, manus circumference has been shown to have a similar predictive relationship with shoulder height33. These parameters were determined for each isolated track (or representative track in a trackway), including manus and pes (Table 1), using equations previously proposed31,33 (see Methods). A similar approach has been applied to mammoth track studies in North America21,27, where modern ontogenetic and body-mass data has been used to provide age and size estimates from fossil tracks.
From the skeletal record, sexual dimorphism of P. antiquus was observed to be more accentuated than in extant elephants, especially in terms of size differences1. During the first 10 years of life, both male and female African bush elephant foot lengths increase rapidly, with the fastest growth shown in the first two years for calves33,37. In P. antiquus, males would have continued to grow until their fifties according to bone data1, while females would have been much smaller as result of energy expenditure with reproduction, flattening the growth curve just after puberty. That is why the equations of Lee and Moss33 that discriminates the shoulder height from tracks for males and females have been applied. However, by comparison with the study of Marano and Palombo32 (based on the progress of eruption and degree of wear of teeth compared to extant elephants), and the body mass correlation of Larramendi et al.1 for calculating the age of P. antiquus, our MTS ages obtained from the application of the regression curve of Lee and Moss33 are underestimated and must be analysed as minimum age approximations for track lengths corresponding to adolescent and adult animals, especially for males. The obtained estimations from tracks are subject to a level of uncertainty related to biotic and abiotic factors that can distort the data (i.e., taphonomy) as it happens also with the calculations taken from skeletal proportions. Therefore, McNeil et al.21 even included data from frozen mammoth carcasses on the growth curve of Lee and Moss33 for correcting size discrepancies along ontogeny. For P. antiquus, our best data for comparison comes, however, from the flesh reconstructions1.
Ontogenetic implications
Based on the best fossil site found for this species in Europe, corresponding to 70 individual Palaeoloxodon antiquus specimens recovered in Geiseltal, Germany, Larramendi et al.1 developed the best reconstruction, so far, of the life appearance of this species and discussed size, body mass, ontogeny and sexual dimorphism. The Neumark-Nord bone site may be contemporary or slightly older than MTS, corresponding to late Middle Pleistocene-to-Eemian interglacial period1. The authors found that the body mass of P. antiquus males was up to three times more that of male Asian elephants and twice that of extant male African bush elephants. The large size determined for straight-tusked elephants (with an estimated > 400 cm shoulder height in the flesh and body mass of 13 tonnes) and a later complete epiphyseal-diaphyseal fusion of limb bones (not yet totally fused at an estimated age of 47 years), in comparison with extant elephants, suggests that this species had a longer lifespan of 80 years or more1. Sexual dimorphism of P. antiquus was observed to be more accentuated than in extant elephants, with females generally not exceeding 300 cm at the shoulders with an estimated weight of not more than 5.5 tonnes, while males continued to grow until their fifties1. Males in extant elephant species grow more rapidly than females after puberty (i.e., around 7 years in age), which are affected by a trade-off between growth and reproduction. Under normal nutritional conditions, the growth rate is generally higher in males than females leading to a marked difference in size between sexes at already around 10 years in age33,37–39.
The ontogenetic variation in growth projected for the MTS, when compared to what we known from extant proboscideans, is expressed in the track size distribution plot, with the definition of five age classes (Fig. 5; see also Table 1): calves under 2 years in age (when extant elephants experience fastest growth rates in both sexes), juveniles between 2 and 7 years in age (up to when elephant females reach their sexual maturity and therefore experience a strong reduction of growth rate in comparison to males), 7–15 years in age which include pre-puberty males and young female adults, over 15 years in age and < 70 old bulls (with almost stagnation of female growth and males reaching much larger sizes). Trample grounds are important for identifying the social structure and interaction of groups of animals as they represent an extremely short period of time, and thus provide a snapshot of group behavior21. Thus, the MTS reflects the demographic structure of the P. antiquus present in this this habitat at the time it was formed. The age classes-frequency plot shows that a large majority of small tracks found belong to calves within one year in age, with estimated shoulder heights less than 95 cm (Figs.4, 6), and estimated body masses between 70 and 200 kg (Table 1). The post-puberty gender distribution cannot be reflected by the tracks both males and females could produce, due to the fast growth of bulls in relation to females of reproductive age except, and with a certain confidence, when trackways of large and very small animals are found interacting or show parallel direction of movement (Figs. 5, 6 and 7). Only the largest, over 50 cm long tracks already identified in the MTS can confidently be attributed to males (old bulls), but the tracks around 30 cm or less may have been produced by adolescent males or young adult females. The evidence for large bulls, up to 325 cm of estimated shoulder height and over 7 tonnes of estimated body mass, are surprisingly very rare in MTS (represented by only two tracks) and may represent solitary incursions to this habitat (see below).
In the MTS, true tracks reveal the plantar-contact surface. Depth distribution within the track reflects the applied plantar pressure on the thick pad, in all age groups. Living elephants usually touch down phase with their heels and step off of their toes29. Patterns of depth-deformation for P. antiquus from MTS are consistent with the plantar pressure data for modern elephants where, for similar substrate conditions, there are no significant depth differences between animals with estimated body masses of 260 kg and over 1 ton (Figs. 6a–d, 7a). The deepest zone of the track corresponds to its anterior part following the typical rotation during the event foot on-toe off observed in extant elephants (see Fig. 3b, e for a MTS example). The pressure on the feet of elephants is greater on the distal ends of the lateral toes and increases outward from the centre of the foot24,26,40,41. This may leave prominent anterior nail impressions in the plastic substrate of Matalascañas for contemporary small and large tracks.
Several of the small- and large-sized proboscidean tracks have been produced contemporaneously in the MTS (Fig. 6a–d). However, foot length for age in Fig. 5 reveals the preferential presence of young P. antiquus in the MTS, especially calves and juveniles. Smaller elephants are relatively more agile than larger ones, but still move with the same gait as adults28,36. For that, they just need to adopt greater relative stride frequencies and relative stride lengths compared to larger elephants21. That is the reason why overstepping is not evident (but see Fig. 2c for an exception found) in the juvenile-sized trackway but is remarkably evident for the adult-size trackway which intersects it (Fig. 7a–c). Smaller animals took quicker steps with shorter contact durations with relatively longer pace lengths. For this reason, the good preservation of morphological features, without being blurred by overstepping or confounded with similar-sized tracks of other mammals especially in less preserved examples, enabled to discriminate many small proboscidean-type tracks. Their attribution to several individuals based on track size comparisons reflect the prevailing and contemporary presence of youngsters during the short-term environmental conditions that allowed the development and preservation of the MTS.
Matalascañas as a possible straight-tusked elephant reproductive habitat
Extant elephants possess a sex-segregated social structure, centred around a matriarchal family, consisting of one or more related females and their offspring. Males are raised until sexual maturity, around 14–15 years in age, when they approach the shoulder height of adult females42, then becoming loners and only reuniting with the female-led groups for mating43. Nuclear family structure in Loxodonta cyclotis corresponds to a mother-calf pair, or 2–4 animals, and herds in Loxodonta africana are usually extended families between 4 and 14 animals42,44. African forest elephants’ males are solitary, while making transient associations in Loxodonta africana. The remarkable rarity of very large proboscidean tracks in the MTS, with only two tracks over 50 cm in length and clearly made by old bulls, suggests the possibility that the area was visited mainly by matriarchal groups. The characteristics of the MTS as event surface and the comparison of track preservation conditions, such as depth and deformation structures in a relatively firm substrate45 (Fig. 6) provides data to define the impression window for different trackways and tracks which support herding behavior for P. antiquus.
In the original diagnosis of Proboscipeda, Panin and Avram46 suggest likely herding behavior for a large number of deinothere tracks preserved on a small surface, from the upper Miocene of Romania. As in MTS, Mleisa 1 in Abu Dhabi preserves evidence for a herd of Stegotetrabelodon Petrocchi of varying size crossed by single large animals indicating the presence of both herding and solitary social males43. The presence of a small individual around 1 ton in estimated body mass was inferred from these tracks. A herd of probable Palaeoloxodon recki, consisting of both adults and juveniles trackways measuring 19-to-63 cm was described in MIS 5 paleolake deposits from the Arabian interior47. Gregarious behavior and matriarchal herding were previously known for straight-tusked elephants from their track record in similar-aged, MIS 5 eolianites from SW Portugal11,48. There, a trackway attributed to a juvenile was found parallel to other same-directed trackways considered to be two adult females48. A trample ground in the same coastal eolianite reveals a concentration of different sized tracks from where very large asymmetric undertracks organized in parallel trackways, and interpreted as produced by large males, seem to diverge11. This interpretation of social herding structure for P. antiquus seems to be different than the one in MTS, most likely because of a distinctive habitat use.
Matriarchal herd behavior among proboscideans is not surprising and likely evolved early, with its earlier records dated from Late Miocene43,46,49, being also deduced from tracksites in the latest Late Pleistocene of both Mammuthus primigenius20,21 and Mammuthus columbi12,22,27. The presence of calves in these herds was demonstrated only in very rare and remarkable cases. Retallack et al.12 described a trample ground of Mammuthus columbi, from the shores of Fossil Lake in Oregon, and dated from 43.26 ± 0.33 cal ka, showing a herd of 4 adults, a baby, and at least one subadult. The smallest trackway estimates the presence of a calf less than a year old, and intermediate sizes between 1 and 3 years old. In New Mexico, Lucas et al.22 described a likely (Columbian) mammoth tracksite of Late Pleistocene age (22.8–19.43 ka) with hundreds of proboscidean tracks from 15 to 62 cm in length, estimate shoulder heights ranged between 180 cm (juveniles) to 300 cm. Matsukawa and Shibata49 described a tracksite produced by a herd of Stegodon aurorae in the Late Pliocene of Tamagawa. Two parallel trackways of large and small proboscidean tracks suggest a female adult and juvenile. In the MIS 5e-to-5b eolianites from Still Bay, South Africa, coeval with the MTS, Loxodonta africana tracks were described in heavily trampled surfaces, suggesting the passage of a sizeable herd of elephants50. Tracks with the smallest length of 17–19 cm were made by calves about 1 year old, found in two parallel trackways made by two very young animals, walking side-by-side, and influenced by mutual behaviour.
In conclusion, herd structure and social behaviour have been previously inferred for the extinct gomphothere Stegotetrabelodon, deinotheres, mastodon51,52, Stegomastodon and Stegodon aurorae from Japan49, Columbian and woolly mammoths, Loxodonta africana, P. recki and P. antiquus, from upper Miocene and Pleistocene trackways and also from mass-death assemblages53. The MTS provides detail to the existing knowledge on the social structure of P. antiquus, with the evidence of matriarchal groups with newborns, perhaps with just few days to months of existence (Fig. 6), and the inferred rare presence of adult males.
African bush elephants have a hind footprint length at birth of 12.5 cm and a weight of 90 kg, with a minimum estimated shoulder height of 69 cm from a young calf42. For the Amboseli Loxodonta africana, the minimum shoulder height measured was 79 cm for a newborn female33. A comparison of the size categories of Loxodonta cyclotis with those of Loxodonta africana suggested a similar distribution of size, despite a marked difference in stature42. However, growth may have occurred more quickly in P. antiquus, as recorded in the MTS, than for Loxodonta africana, similar to what is known for mammoths20. The Yamal baby mammoth male had a hind foot of 10 cm in length and 8 cm in width, with a measured shoulder height of 67 cm and an estimated age of 3–4 months54 and therefore newborn P. antiquus tracks of the same size, or slightly shorter, from the very plastic sediments of the MTS may have been made by animals with equivalent shoulder height and body mass, i.e., up to 66 cm and around 70 kg.
Female-led family groups are required to remain closer to water as the young need to drink more frequently and cannot cover large distances as quickly as the adults. This tends to restrict the nurseries to areas close to available water20. Therefore, the MTS seems to have been a prime area for matriarchal herds as the bias towards the inferred presence of newborn and juveniles is noteworthy. We interpret the trackways of Figs. 5 and 7a as two examples of straight-tusked elephants walking together, most likely a female moving slowly in response to a close juvenile (reconstitution in Fig. 7e).
The dietary behaviour of P. antiquus populations in different climatic conditions, resulting from microwear and isotopic analysis55, has documented different feeding behaviours, particularly browser versus grazer-prevalent diets. African forest elephants living in moist semi-deciduous forests and rainforests are browser-frugivorous44. However, high numbers of elephants use the coastal area of Gabon, with strongly seasonal rainfall, throughout the year56. Elephants were observed foraging along the coastal shrub areas adjacent to the beach, particularly during the rainy season. Seasonally they spend more time in grassland than in forest during the short-wet season, when grasses grow faster57. Reolid et al.6 hypothesized that in southern Spain, the P. antiquus would have seasonally migrated beween the highlands of the Guadix-Basa Basin and the lowlands of the western Guadalquivir Basin where the MTS is located. As in the coastal area of Gabon, the MTS coastal area may have provided a mosaic of open grasslands in the dune complex and evergreen forest with high tree and shrub density near the banks of the Guadalquivir river, that afforded cover and browsing to the matriarchal groups during the Last Interglacial. Straight-tusked elephants may have included fresh grasses from the humid grassland dependent on the interdune ponds, in their diet. In the African elephants, mating usually occurs during the dry season58. If the gestation in P. antiquus was expectadly like for any modern elephant, i.e., around 20–22 months59, this would imply giving birth during the spring after the rainy season, when the freshwater ponds in Doñana would be in their full capacity, as in present days60. The retreating waters, starting in May, would have left behind important grasslands that may have provided available water and high-nutritious food resources for the new mothers and breast-feeding calves. The paleosol development with abundant rhizoliths clearly shows the growth of dense vegetation. The high-plasticity of the trampled clayey-sandy substrate and the presence of shrinkage cracks intersected by some tracks allow us to conclude that the water-level was retreating in the MTS interdune pond. The rare occurrence of large tracks shows that MTS was not a habitat for the male adults of P. antiquus. Nevertheless, the Doñana interdune freshwater pond system is an important source of available water in the coastal area and the pond-dependent seasonal grasslands would have been available, especially for old males requiring vegetation that was easier to chew.
Neanderthals in the MTS: food procurement and elephants
During the study of the MTS, short trackways and isolated tracks of both adult and young humans were found together with large herbivore ones (Fig. 8). Meanwhile, Mayoral et al.18 claimed to have found 87 hominin tracks, most of them constituting what they called the Hominin Trampled Surface (HTS). However, it is evident from their Fig. 3, that HTS is the continuation of the MTS in the most exposed area of the present shore to tidal and wave erosion. This important finding rises questions regarding the ecological reasons for the presence of Neanderthals in coastal environments and especially in the MTS. In fact, reconstructing hominin paleoecology is critical for understanding diets, social organizations and interactions with other animals6.
During MIS 5, Neanderthals would find in the coastal areas of SW Spain, visited by large herbivores according to both the track and body fossil (including P. antiquus61) record, important food resources for hunting and scavenging62, and the opportunity of including seafood in their diets63. In fact, besides Neanderthal tracks in the MTS we recorded the presence in concentrations of Mousterian-type lithic tools which are still under study. Neanderthals may have actively selected the best body parts for meat and fat from mega-herbivores, including proboscideans. Elephants are relatively easy to locate due to their dependency on water resources, reported use of familiar paths, and the clear tracks they leave behind64. There is an increasing amount of evidence that proboscideans, and especially young individuals, played a major role in Neanderthal’s diet and adaptation64–67. Anzidel et al.67 interpreted a late Middle Pleistocene occurrence in Italy of P. antiquus with Neanderthal lithic tools as resulting from scavenging activity. Contemporary from Matalascañas, in Manzanares valley (Madrid), Panera Gallego et al.68 have found typical Neanderthal lithic tools associated to skeletal remains of a possible young straight-tusked elephant, including also a couple of tracks 17–22 cm in length that could be related to the same animal. Considering the ichnological record of elephant-human interactions, McNeil et al.20 described a woolly mammoth tracksite in southwestern Canada dated between 11,3–11 ka with ichnological evidence of modern humans hunting the megafauna. Fladerer69 in skeletal record and Haynes53 in the track record found selective mortality of juvenile mammoths as result of modern humans selecting the smaller animals because they were easier to kill or to process. Mammoths-human interactions were also revealed through tracks in New Mexico27.
The repeated pattern of young proboscidean procurement suggests that age played a significant role in their selection, likely related to a better nutritional value and the relative ease to hunt and butchering, as well as transporting the best nutritious parts64. Therefore, and in parallel with the examples provided, the coetaneous presence of Neanderthal tracks and lithic tools together with megafauna trackways, including P. antiquus, rises the hypothesis that the MTS coastal pond may have been an elephant resource habitat for Neanderthals. They would be here seasonally intentionally hunting more accessible targets such as calves, juveniles or weakened females in delivery, or opportunistically scavenging stillbirths and females dead from birth.
Methods
Since the MTS is located in the intertidal zone of the Matalascañas beach, an area affected by mesotidal gradients (mean tidal range above 2 m30), and usually covered by beach sand (Fig. S1), the time factor constrained data recovery. Field work consisted largely in a daily survey for MTS areas cleaned from sand by the tides, taking measurements from tracks and trackways using standard vertebrate ichnological procedures, including GPS location, and taking photographs with a Canon PowerShot SX50HD and Canon EOS 1200D. Most of the time the MTS is almost fully covered with over 1.5 m of sand beach that prevents the full perspective and exposure of the MTS. Only an exceptional situation of the spring storm surges in 2020 allowed to make detailed analyses of a wide area of the tracksite in the backshore not exposed to continuous tidal erosion, and where well-preserved tracks can be found in the MTS.
Sedimentology of the paleosol unit, in which the trampled surface with proboscidean and other mammal and bird tracks was developed, was detailed by Zazo et al.15,30 and Roquero et al.17. MTS occurs on the top of the paleosol PS130 at the base of the succession, and at the toe of the El Asperillo littoral cliff, which represents the Quaternary infill of the Neogene basin of the lower Guadalquivir River. Tectonic uplift and sea-level changes in the coastal plain allowed the accumulation of a Pleistocene-Holocene succession of stacked, weakly-cemented to uncemented eolian sand dunes. Sediments in this succession consist mainly of very well sorted, medium to fine sand. Quartz grains average 70%, plagioclase and potassic feldspar less than 5%17. The PS1 at the eastern end of the El Asperillo cliff, developed in a sedimentary hiatus within the OSL-dated AU1 eolian unit, is described30 as a unit “intensely burrowed, clayey sand with vertically elongated, redoximorphic features formed during a temperate, moist climate with a dry season”. Vertical structures, forming mottles with a high kaolinite-content (19%), are related to rhizoliths, and ferriargillans reveal clay illuviation related to hydromorphic processes, mostly in reducing environments around roots17,30. The hiatus was long, resulting in the development of a mature paleosol 1 m thick, under the influence of vegetation and a shallow phreatic level linked to the uprising sea-level during the last interglacial period30. The shallow phreatic level would frequently surpass the topographic level in the interdune area during the wet season, creating or recharging interdune lakes or ponds14,16. The top of PS1 shows evidence of erosional truncation17 which means that the paleosol was subjected to erosional phases, possibly during the dry season, that might have prevented the preservation of tracks. Therefore, during the last drying phase of the interdune lake, the MTS may have been formed. Preserved exposures of the PS1 were quickly covered by either a ferriargillan coating and by eolian sediments from the AU1, which allowed the preservation of the MTS from weathering and erosion.
For numbering of the tracks, we established sectors in the MTS with areas exhibiting proboscidean tracks, where the different track lengths could clear indicate different individuals required for the calculation of the population structure. Track size subdivision was based grosso modo on the main age classes defined for extant elephants that show sexual dimorphism especially after the juvenile period: calves (fastest growth period within the first two years of life), juveniles (the end of this period defined by female puberty), adolescents (the end of this cycle marked by male puberty), adults (a period where it is not possible to differentiate males from females in the track record) and old bulls (whose track size is larger than any track produced by females). The current application of the shoulder height on foot length equations33–36 in studies of both extant and fossil proboscidean populations allowed us to estimate body mass and age for the track producers in the MTS. Estimations with both manus and pes lengths were made since we found no significant difference when comparing results from the same trackway. Usually, the criteria used was to measure pes preferently, or manus if pes were not available (for trackways). The estimation of shoulder height, body mass and age followed formulas currently in use for studies of extant proboscidean populations distribution, except for body mass, whose equation was recently developed specifically for P. antiquus by Larramendi et al.1,36.
Therefore, for shoulder height (E.S.H.) on foot length (FL) we used the regression of Lee and Moss33,
Body Mass (E.B.M.) for P. antiquus1,
Finally, the estimated shoulder height for age was plotted in the Van Bertalanffy fitted curves for both male and female Loxodonta africana defined by Lee and Moss33 to obtain an approximate age for the trackmaker.
For the morphological study of the tracks, we applied current standards of data acquisition and 3D image analysis using digital photogrammetry70. Photos were taken in orthogonal and oblique views (resolution 4000 × 3000 and 5184 × 3456 pixels, in JPG format). Scales were placed on the surface to subsequently assign metric accuracy to the 3D models produced. The photogrammetric processing of the tracks was carried out with the free open-source software OpenDroneMap 2.1.071 and Meshroom 2021.1.0 (© 2010 2019 Alice Vision72. The post-processing was carried out using free open-source software MeshLab v2020.1273 and CloudCompare v2.11.0.74. Post-processing phase involved the analysis, treatment, fit to the plane, orientation and scale assignment to the textured photogrammetric models obtained. The attribution of techniques that allow the microtopographic enhancement of the tracks under analysis, substantially facilitate their interpretation and, consequently, the achievement of more precise measurements and angles, often allowing observation of details that, in fact, would not be easy or possible to observe in the field. For the purpose of interpretation and visualization of the new tracks presented, we preferred the presentation, in different views, of 3D models in false colours highlighted with shadows, representing the altimetric variation (depth maps) of the modelled surfaces. The Fig. 3 was compiled in the free open-source software Inkscape v0.92.375.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Research was possible thanks to the Delegaciones territoriales de Huelva, Consejería de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Desarrollo Sostenible and Consejería de Cultura (Junta de Andalucía), Servicio de Geodiversidad y Biodiversidad (Dirección General de Medio Natural, Biodiversidad y Espacios Protegidos) and The National Park of Doñana. Thanks to Juan Jose Negro for several photos provided and Ramón López Romero during fieldwork. This work has been supported by the Research Groups RNM-293 and RNM-238, University of Huelva & Junta de Andalucía, and by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, (with FEDER and COMPETE 2020 funds) under the project UIDB/MAR/04292/2020 (MARE — Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre). CNC would like to thank the financial support from the Câmara Municipal de Odemira. This work also received institutional support from the Naturtejo, E.I.M. (Naturtejo UNESCO Global Geopark). We would like to thank to all the colleagues who have collaborated in the field campaigns. The authors extend their warm appreciation to the Editorial Board member Matteo Belvedere and the reviewers Lara Sciscio and an anonymous that helped to significantly improve the present paper.
Author contributions
The individual contributions of each co-author to the article are as follows: C.N.C. coordinated the manuscript and participated in the data analysis. Z.B. participated in the manuscript and data analysis. A.T., P.G., J.M.G., L.M.C., F.R. and S.R.C. compiled the data acquisition. J.B., P.P.C. and M.C. analysed the tracks. F.M. participated in the manuscript and field work. J.R.V. designed the project and participated in the field work. F.G.G., C.F., G.F. and S.F. provided contextual data. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Data availability
The 3D track data analysed during the current study are available in the Figshare repository: Fig. 3: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082233; Fig. 4: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082323; Fig. 6: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082128.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-96754-1.
References
- 1.Larramendi A, Palombo MR, Marano F. Reconstructing the life appearance of a Pleistocene giant: size, shape, sexual dimorphism and ontogeny of Palaeoloxodon antiquus (Proboscidea: Elephantidae) from Neumark-Nord 1 (Germany) Boll. Soc. Paleont. Italiana. 2017;56(3):299–317. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meyer M, et al. Palaeogenomes of Eurasian straight-tusked elephants challenge the current view of elephant evolution. eLife. 2017;6:e25413. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Palkopoulou E, et al. A comprehensive genomic history of extinct and living elephants. PNAS. 2018;115:E2566–E2574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720554115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Braun IM, Palombo MR. Mammuthus primigenius in the cave and portable art: An overview with a short account on the elephant fossil record in Southern Europe during the last glacial. Quat. Int. 2012;276–277:61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Palombo MR. Discrete dispersal bioevents of large mammals in Southern Europe in the post-Olduvai Early Pleistocene: A critical review. Quat. Int. 2017;431:3–19. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reolid M, Sánchez-Gómez M, Ros-Montoya S. The first record of Palaeoloxodon cf. antiquus (Proboscidea, Middle Pleistocene) from the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin (SE Spain): taphonomy and relation with other outcrops. Estudios Geologicos. 2021;77(1):a136. doi: 10.3989/egeol.44105.577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mol D, De Vos J, Van der Plicht J. The presence and extinction of Elephas antiquus Falconer and Cautley, 1847, in Europe. Quat. Int. 2007;169–170:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2006.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Álvarez-Lao DJ, García N. Geographical distribution of Pleistocene cold-adapted large mammal faunas in the Iberian Peninsula. Quat. Int. 2011;233:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brugal JP, Raposo L. Foz do Enxarrique (Ródão, Portugal): preliminary results of the analysis of a bone assemblage from a middle paleolithic open site. In: Gaudzinski S, Turner E, editors. The role of early humans in the accumulation of European lower and middle palaeolithic bone assemblages. Mainz: Mon. des Röm.-Germ. Zent.-mus. Mainz; 1999. pp. 367–379. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Muñiz F, et al. Following the last Neanderthals: Mammal tracks in Late Pleistocene coastal dunes of Gibraltar (S Iberian Peninsula) Quat. Sc. Rev. 2019;217:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Neto de Carvalho C, et al. Tracking the last elephants in Europe during the Würm Pleniglacial: the importance of the Late Pleistocene aeolianite record in SW Iberia. Ichnos. 2020;27(3):352–360. doi: 10.1080/10420940.2020.1744586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Retallack GJ, et al. Late Pleistocene mammoth trackway from Fossil Lake, Oregon. Palaeog. Palaeoec. Palaeocl. 2018;496:192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Palombo MR, Panarello A, Mietto P. Did elephants meet humans along the Devil’s path? A preliminary report. Alp. Med. Quat. 2018;31:83–87. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neto de Carvalho C, et al. First vertebrate tracks and palaeoenvironment in a MIS-5 context in the Doñana National Park (Huelva, SW Spain) Quat. Sc. Rev. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zazo C, et al. Pleistocene and Holocene aeolian facies along the Huelva coast (southern Spain): climatic and neotectonic implications. Geol. Mij. 1999;77:209–224. doi: 10.1023/A:1003689518310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neto de Carvalho C, et al. Paleoecological implications of large-sized wild boar tracks recorded during the Last Interglacial (MIS 5) at Huelva (SW Spain) Palaios. 2020 doi: 10.2110/palo.2020.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roquero E, Silva PG, Zazo C, Goy JL, Dabrio CJ, Borja F. Micromorphology of hydromorphic soils developed in fluvio-marine sediments during the Middle-Late Pleistocene transit in the Gulf of Cadiz (Atlantic South Spain) Span. J. Soil Sci. 2013;3(3):184–200. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayoral E, Díaz-Martínez I, Duveau J, Santos A, Ramírez AR, Morales JA, Morales LA, Díaz-Delgado R. Tracking late Pleistocene Neandertals on the Iberian Coast. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:4103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83413-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Abbassi N, Alinasiri S, Lucas SG. New localities of Late Eocene vertebrate footprints from the Tarom Mountains, Northwestern Iran. Hist. Biol. 2017;29(7):987–1006. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2016.1267162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McNeil P, Hills LV, Kooyman B, Tolman SM. Mammoth tracks indicate a declining Late Pleistocene population in southwestern Alberta, Canada. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2005;24:1253–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.08.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McNeil P, Hills LV, Tolman SM, Kooyman B. Significance of latest Pleistocene tracks, trackways and trample grounds from southwestern Alberta, Canada. Can. Bull. Nat. H. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 2007;42:209–224. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lucas SG, Allen BD, Morgan GS, Myers RG, Love DW, Bustos D. Mammoth footprints from the Upper Pleistocene of the Tularosa basin, Doñana county, New Mexico. In: Lucas SG, Spielmann, Lockley MG, editors. Cenozoic Vertebrate Tracks and Traces. New Mexico Mus. Nat. Hist. Sc.; 2007. pp. 149–154. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aramayo SA, Manera de Bianco T, Bastianelli NV, Melchor RN. Pehuen Co: Updated taxonomic review of a late Pleistocene ichnological site in Argentina. Palaeog. Palaeoec. Palaeocl. 2015;439:144–165. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pasenko MR. Quantitative and qualitative data of footprints produced by Asian (Elephas maximus) and African (Loxodonta africana) elephants and with a discussion of significance towards fossilized proboscidean footprints. Quat. Int. 2017;443:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.05.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oliva C, Arregui M. Mammalian Ichnopathology: a case study of Holartic ungulates (Gomphotheriidae, Equidae, Camelidae) of the Late Pleistocene of South America. Ichnotaxonomic implications. Bol. Soc. Geol. Mex. 2018;70(2):417–447. doi: 10.18268/BSGM2018v70n2a10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Panagiotopoulou O, et al. Foot pressure distributions during walking in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) R. Soc. O. Sci. 2016;3:160203. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bennett MR, Bustos D, Belvedere M, Martinez P, Reynolds SC, Urban T. Soft-sediment deformation below mammoth tracks at White Sands National Monument (New Mexico) with implications for biomechanical inferences from tracks. Palaeog. Palaeoec. Palaeocl. 2019;527:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hutchinson JR, Schwerda D, Flamini DJ, Dale RHI, Fischer MS, Kram R. The locomotor kinematics of Asian and African elephants: Changes with speed and size. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209:3812–3827. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Platt BF, Hasiotis ST, Hirmas DR. Empirical determination of physical controls on megafaunal footprint formation through neoichnological experiments with elephants. Palaios. 2012;27:725–737. doi: 10.2110/palo.2012.p12-006r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zazo C, et al. Landscape evolution and geodynamic controls in the Gulf of Cadiz (Huelva coast, SW Spain) during the Late Quaternary. Geomorphology. 2005;68:269–290. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Larramendi A. Shoulder height, body mass, and shape of proboscideans. Acta Palaeo. Pol. 2011;61:537–574. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marano F, Palombo MR. Population structure in straight-tusked elephants: A case study from Neumark Nord 1 (late Middle Pleistocene? Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany. Boll. Soc. Pal. Ital. 2013;52:207–218. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee PC, Moss CJ. Statural growth in known-age African elephants (Loxodonta Africana) J. Zool. 1995;236:29–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb01782.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Western D, Moss C, Georgiadis N. Age estimation and population age structure of elephants from footprint dimensions. J. Wildl. Manag. 1983;47:1192–1197. doi: 10.2307/3808191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Della Rocca F. How tall is an elephant? Two methods for estimating elephant height. Web Ecol. 2007;7:1–10. doi: 10.5194/we-7-1-2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hutchinson JR, Delmer C, Miller CE, Hildebrandt T, Pitsillides AA, Boyde A. From flat foot to fat foot: Structure, ontogeny, function and evolution of elephant “sixth toes”. Science. 2011;334(6063):1699–1703. doi: 10.1126/science.1211437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lindeque M, Van Jaarveld AS. Postnatal growth of elephants Loxodonta africana in Etocha National Park. Nam. J. Zool. 1993;229:319–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02639.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hanks J. Growth of the African elephant (Loxodonta Africana) E. Afr. Wildl. J. 1972;10:251–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1972.tb00870.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Arivazhagan C, Sukumar R. Constructing age structures of Asian elephant populations: A comparison of two field methods of age estimation. Gajah. 2008;29:11–16. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Panagiotopoulou O, Pataky TC, Hill Z, Hutchinson JR. Statistical parametric mapping of the regional distribution and ontogenetic scaling of foot pressures during walking in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) J. Exp. Biol. 2012;215:1584–1593. doi: 10.1242/jeb.065862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Urban TM, et al. 3-D radar imaging unlocks the untapped behavioral and biomechanical archive of Pleistocene ghost tracks. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:16470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52996-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Morgan BJ, Lee PC. Forest elephant (Loxodonta Africana cyclotis) stature in the Réserve de Faune du Petit Loango, Gabon. J. Zool. 2003;259:337–344. doi: 10.1017/S0952836902003291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bibi F, Kraatz B, Craig N, Beech M, Schuster M, Hill A. Early evidence for complex social structure in Proboscidea from a late Miocene trackway site in the United Arab Emirates. Biol. Lett. 2012;8:670–673. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grubb P, Groves CP, Dudley JP, Shoshani J. Living African elephants belong to two species: Loxodonta africana (Blumenbach, 1797) and Loxodonta cyclotis (Matschie, 1900) Elephant. 2000;2(4):1–4. doi: 10.22237/elephant/1521732169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bates KT, et al. Does footprint depth correlate with foot motion and pressure? J. R. Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130009. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Panin N, Avram E. Noe urne de vertebrate in Miocenul Subcarpatilor rominesti. St. Cerc. Geol. 1962;7:455–484. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stewart M, Clark-Wilson R, Breeze PS, Janulis K, Candy I, Armitage SJ, Ryves DB, Louys J, Duval M, Price GJ, Cuthbertson P, Bernal MA, Drake NA, Alsharekh AM, Zahrani B, Al-Omari A, Roberts P, Groucutt HS, Petraglia MD. Human footprints provide snapshot of last interglacial ecology in the Arabian interior. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaba8940. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Neto de Carvalho C. Vertebrate tracksites from the Mid-Late Pleistocene eolianites of Portugal: The first record of elephant tracks in Europe. Geol. Q. 2009;53(4):407–414. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Matsukawa M, Shibata K. Review of Japanese Cenozoic (Miocene-Modern) vertebrate tracks. Ichnos. 2015;22:261–290. doi: 10.1080/10420940.2015.1064407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Roberts DL, Bateman MD, Murray-Wallace CV, Carr AS, Holmes PJ. Last interglacial fossil elephant trackway dated by OSL/AAR in coastal aeolianites, Still Bay, South Africa. Palaeog. Palaeoec. Palaeocl. 2008;257:261–279. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hubbard WJ, Fischer DC, Kardulias PN. Mastodon body weight estimates from footprints and a scale model. Curr. Res. Pleist. 2000;17:122–123. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Haynes G, Klimowicz J. Mammoth (Mammuthus spp) and American mastodont (Mammut americanum) bonesites: What do the differences mean? Deinsea. 2003;9:185–204. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haynes G. Finding meaning in mammoth age profiles. Quat. Int. 2017;443:65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vereshchagin NK, Tikhonov AN. Exterior of the mammoth. Cranium. 1999;16(1):4–44. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Palombo MR, Filippi M, Iacumin P, Longinelli A, Barbieri M, Maras A. Coupling tooth microwear and stable isotopic analyses for palaeodiet reconstruction: The case study of Late Middle Pleistocene Elephas (Palaeoloxodon) antiquus teeth from Central Italy (Rome area) Quat. Int. 2005;126–128:153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Greth A. Gamba, la plage des eléphants. Pand. Avr. 1997;66:19–21. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mills EC, et al. Forest elephant movement and habitat use in a tropical forest-grassland mosaic in Gabon. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e199387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Perry JS. The reproduction of the African Elephant, Loxodonta africana. R. Soc. 1953;237:93–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hilderbrandt TB, Goritz F, Hermes R, Reid C, Dehnhard M, Brown L. Aspects of the reproductive biology and breeding management of Asian and African elephants Elephas maximus and Loxodonta cyclotis. Int. Zool. Yearb. 2006;40:20–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00020.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Díaz-Paniagua C, et al. Temporary ponds from Doñana National Park: A system of natural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica. 2010;29(1):41–58. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Roach NT, Hatala KG, Ostrofsky KR, Villmoare B, Reeves JS, Du A, Braun DR, Harris JWK, Behrensmeyer AK, Richmond BG. Pleistocene footprints show intensive use of lake margin habitats by Homo erectus groups. Sci. Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep26374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hardy BL, Moncil MH. Neanderthal use of fish, mammals, bird, starchy plants and wood 125–250,000 years ago. PLoS ONE. 2020;6:e23768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Agam A, Barkai R. Elephant and Mammoth hunting during the Paleolithic: A review of the relevant archaeological, ethnographic and ethnohistorical records. Quaternary. 2018;1:3. doi: 10.3390/quat1010003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Smith GM. Neanderthal megafaunal exploitation in Western Europe and its dietary implications. A context reassessment of La Cotte de St. Brelade (Jersey) J. Hum. Evol. 2015;78:181–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Germonpré M, Udrescu M, Fiers E. Possible evidence of mammoth hunting at the Nenderthal site of Spy (Belgium) Quat. Int. 2014;337:28–42. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Salazar-García DC, Pover RC, Sanchis Serra A, Villaverde V, Walker MJ, Henry AG. Neanderthal diets in central and southwestern Mediterranean Iberia. Quat. Int. 2013;318:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Anzidel AP, Bulgarelli GM, Catalano P, Cerilli E, Gallotti R, Lemorini C, Milli S, Palombo MR, Pantano W, Santucci E. Ongoing research at the late Middle Pleistocene site of La Polledrara di Cicanibbio (central Italy), with emphasis on human-elephant relationships. Quat. Int. 2012;255:171–187. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Panera J, Rubio-Jara S, Yravedra J, Blain HA, Sesé C, Pérez-González A. Manzanares valley (Madrid, Spain): A good country for Proboscideans and Neanderthals. Quat. Int. 2014;326:329–343. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fladerer FA. A calf-dominated mammoth age profile from the 27 ka BP stadial Korems-Wachtberg site in the middle Danube valley. Adv. Mamm. Res. 2003;9:135–158. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Falkingham PL, et al. A standard protocol for documenting modern and fossil ichnological data. Palaeontology. 2018;61(4):469–480. doi: 10.1111/pala.12373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.OpenDroneMap Authors ODM—A command line toolkit to generate maps, point clouds, 3D models and DEMs from drone, balloon or kite images. OpenDroneMap/ODM GitHub Page. https://github.com/OpenDroneMap/ODM (2020).
- 72.AliceVision. Meshroom: V2021.1.0. GNU-GPL. https://alicevision.org/ (2021).
- 73.Cignoni, P. et al. MeshLab: An Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool. In Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, 129–136 (2008).
- 74.CloudCompareV2.11.0. GNU-GPL. www.cloudcompare.org. (2020).
- 75.Inkscape. Draw freely. V0.92.3 GNU-GPL. www.inkscape.org. (2018).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The 3D track data analysed during the current study are available in the Figshare repository: Fig. 3: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082233; Fig. 4: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082323; Fig. 6: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15082128.