Abstract
In female rats, pubertal onset is associated with maturation of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and mPFC-mediated behaviors. These behavioral and anatomical changes are likely due to effects of estrogens at the nuclear estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), which is expressed at higher levels than the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) isoform in the adult mPFC. Researchers have previously quantified ERβ protein and Esr2 RNA in rodents during early postnatal development and adulthood, but an adolescent-specific trajectory of this receptor in the mPFC has not been documented. Given that Esr2 expression can fluctuate in the presence or absence of estrogens, puberty and the subsequent rise in gonadal hormones could influence levels of ERβ in the adolescent brain. To further explore this, we used RNAscope to quantify the amount of Esr2 mRNA in pre-pubertal adolescent, recently post-pubertal adolescent, and adult female rats. We show here that Esr2 expression decreases significantly in the mPFC, striatum and motor cortex between pre-pubertal adolescence and adulthood. In the mPFC, this decrease occurs rapidly at pubertal onset, with no significant decrease in Esr2 levels between the recently post-pubertal and adult cohort. In contrast, the striatum and motor cortex had no significant differences in the amount of Esr2 mRNA between pre- and post-pubertal females. Insofar as the amount of Esr2 expression is proportional to functional ERβ, these results suggest ERβ decreases in a region-specific pattern in response to pubertal onset and highlight a role for this receptor in the maturational events that occur in the female rat mPFC at puberty.
Keywords: adolescence, cortex, striatum, RNAscope, estrogens
Introduction
Adolescence, the transitional period between childhood and adulthood, is often defined by pubertal onset and the subsequent rise in gonadal hormones. These hormones play an important role in the development and reorganization of the adolescent brain1, particularly within the female medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)2. For instance, ovarian hormones are necessary for the neuronal pruning that occurs in this region during adolescence3. Pubertal onset also coincides with synaptic pruning as well as an abrupt decrease in the number and density of perineuronal nets (PNNs) 4,5, and pubertal estrogens drive an increase in inhibition in the frontal cortex6. Together, these results suggest pubertal onset could rapidly influence cortical plasticity in the female mPFC. A possible functional correlate of these changes is an induction at pubertal onset of adult-like behaviors on a cognitive flexibility paradigm 7, a task that relies on GABAergic functioning in the prefrontal cortex 8. Given that all these developmental events occur at pubertal onset when females are experiencing a rapid increase in estradiol, estrogen receptors likely play an important regulatory role in these processes.
Endogenous estrogens bind with equal affinity to their two known nuclear receptors: the estrogen receptor α (ERα) and the estrogen receptor β (ERβ) 9,10. Both receptors are present throughout the human and rodent brain, as well as peripheral tissue, though their expression patterns are often region- and tissue specific. For example in adult rats, ERα mRNA is more highly expressed in the pituitary, uterus and other peripheral reproductive tissues 11, and both receptors are detected in the hypothalamus in nuclei-specific patterns 12. As such, ERα has often been implicated in reproductive behaviors and fertility 13,14. ERβ is more prevalent in the rodent cortex and hippocampus 12,15–17, and plays an important modulatory role in cognitive 18,19, social 20, and emotional behaviors 21–25 These effects are likely due in part to ERβ’s influences on synaptic plasticity 23,26–28.
Most of the research on ERβ levels has been conducted in adult, ovariectomized subjects, though studies have demonstrated that the amount of ERβ RNA fluctuates during development, particularly within the mPFC. At birth and across the first postnatal week, ERα is the prominent receptor subtype in the rodent mPFC 29,30, but this pattern soon reverses, and ERβ becomes the dominant subtype in the juvenile mPFC 12,30,31. The same is true in the adult cortex, with ERα being virtually absent in the adult mPFC, but work that examines how levels of ERβ fluctuate during adolescence and pubertal onset specifically is lacking. Both brain and peripheral ERβ expression levels are altered in the presence or absence of both endogenous and exogenous estrogens in region- and dose-specific patterns 11,32–35. Therefore, the rapid increase in estradiol at pubertal onset36–38 could influence ERβ expression in the mPFC, a region we have previously shown is sensitive to these hormones during this time2
Currently, there is no validated antibody that binds to ERβ using immunohistochemistry in perfused tissues 39. The newer technological method RNAscope, however, has been employed to visualize Esr2, ERβ mRNA, in the rodent brain 40. Here we aimed to quantify levels of Esr2 in female adolescent and adult rats, with particular emphasis on the effects of pubertal onset on the amount Esr2. We measured Esr2 levels in the mPFC, as well as the dorsal striatum and motor cortex, two regions that have low levels of Esr2 expression and ERβ in adulthood 12,17,41. Levels of Esr2 were quantified before and after pubertal onset in adolescent females and in early adulthood.
Methods
Subjects
Subjects were the female offspring of Long Evans rats ordered from Envigo [Formerly Harlan] (Indianapolis, IN) that were bred in the vivarium of the Psychology Department at the University of Illinois. To minimize exposure to compounds with estrogenic properties, subjects were housed in BPA-free polysulfone cages with heat treated-hardwood beta chip bedding (Northeaster Product Corp., NY), fed a low phytoestrogen food (Harlan 2020X; Teklad Diets, Madison, WI), and provided reverse osmosis-filtered water in glass bottles. Rats were weaned at P25, housed in groups of two or three with same-sex littermates and provided food and water ad libitum with a 12:12 light-dark cycle. All procedures were approved and adhered to guidelines set forth by the University of Illinois Institutional Care and Use Committee and by the National Institutes of Health guidelines on the ethical use of animals.
Two of the time points for sacrifice in this study were determined based on pubertal status, so pubertal onset was assessed daily beginning at postnatal day (P) 29 in females. Pubertal onset was determined by vaginal opening, which corresponds to increases in luteinizing hormone and estradiol 37,42 and is followed by the first estrus 43. Within a litter when subjects reached puberty, they were sacrificed 24 hours later with an age- and sex- matched sibling that had not yet reached puberty. These are referred to as the “Post” and “Pre” groups, respectively. The range of age for vaginal opening was P31–36. A third group of litter-matched females was sacrificed at P60, referred to here as the “Adult” group.
At sacrifice, subjects were deeply anesthetized with a lethal injection of sodium pentobarbitol and perfused intracardially with a 0.1 M solution of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by a 4% paraformaldehyde fixative solution in PBS (pH 7.4). Brains were post-fixed in the paraformaldehyde solution for an additional 24 hours followed by immersion in a cryoprotectant 30% sucrose solution. At this point all brains were coded to conceal group from the experimenters. After 72 hours, brains were sliced in 40 μm coronal sections using a freezing microtome. Sections were stored at −20°C in an anti-freeze storage solution until processing (30% glycerol, 30% ethylene glycol, 30% dH20, 10% 0.2 M PBS). Sections of this tissue were also used in Drzewiecki et al.5.
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization with RNAscope
Levels of Esr2, the gene that encodes ERβ, were assessed using RNAscope fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The Esr2 probe (ACD, catalog #317161) was verified in silico by ACD and recently by Kanaya et al.40. Additionally, the probe was further verified with the positive probe (PPIB, provided by ACD), and absence of signal with the negative probe (provided by ACD) as well as in slices where the Esr2 probe was excluded. RNAscope has been proven to be an effective method to visualize target probes in perfused brain slices that are 40 μm thick44.
The RNAscope protocol for fixed tissue from Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) was followed for visualization or the Esr2 probe, with minor modifications as advised by the company. The protocol was conducted over two days. To begin day 1, tissue slices stored in anti-freeze storage solution were washed triplicate in PBS and mounted on Superfrost Plus slides and allowed to dry completely at room temperature. The slides were then baked at 60° C for 30 minutes, followed by incubation in ice cold 4% paraformaldehyde (made the day prior and at a pH 7.4) for 15 minutes at 4° C. Slides were further dehydrated using a series of ethanol dilutions, and then baked again for 30 minutes at 60° C. Next, slides were incubated in hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes at room temperature before beginning the target retrieval process.
The target retrieval solution provided by ACD was diluted to 1X and warmed to at least 99° C along with dH2O in a steamer. The slides were placed in the warm water solution for 10 seconds and then quickly moved to the warmed target retrieval solution where they were incubated in the steamer for 5 minutes. After retrieval, slides were briefly rinsed in dH2O at room temperature, followed by a 5 minute incubation in 100% ethanol. Finally, slides were air dried at room temperature and a hydrophobic barrier was drawn around slices using ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen (ACD, catalog # 310018).
Following target retrieval, all steps were performed using chemicals provided in the Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 (ACD, catalog # 323100), and all incubations were done in a humidity controlled chamber at 40° C. First, slides were coated in the protease solution and incubated for 30 minutes. Then slides were rinsed twice for two minutes in dH2O and incubated in the Esr2 probe (ACD, catalog #317161) for 2 hours, followed by a wash step. After hybridization of the probes, all wash steps were conducted using wash buffer solution (ACD, catalog # 310091), and consisted of two washes in the buffer for two minutes each. The slides were stored overnight in a 5X saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer solution.
The following day, slides underwent a wash step and began incubations in the three separate amplification solutions. Each amplification was separated by a wash step. After the amplification steps, channel 1 was established and the slices were incubated in a 1:750 solution of Opal 570 (Akoya Biosciences, catalog # FP1488001KT) diluted in TSA Buffer (ACD). Following incubation in the fluorophores, slices were washed and then incubated in HRP channel blocker. Finally, slides were briefly rinsed with DAPI, before coverslipping with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher, catalog # P36930). Slides were dried in the dark overnight at room temperature, and then stored at 4° C until imaging.
Microscopy, Imaging, and Fluorescence Analysis
Slides were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 880 microscope within 3 days of the FISH protocol. Images were acquired from layer II/III of the mPFC, layers II/III and V/VI of the motor cortex, and the dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum. Regions of interest were identified using the DAPI stain, and 8 separate images (4 per hemisphere) were acquired for each subject within each subregion analyzed (Figure 1). Images were obtained by taking z-stacks of 30 separate images across 20.3 μm of tissue at 8 unique sites within each region. The z-stacking specifications were held consistent across all subjects.
Figure 1.
Sampling regions (a) and representative images Esr2 puncta in pre-pubertal, adolescent females within the mPFC (b), motor cortex (c), and dorsal striatum (d). Esr2 puncta in the mPFC overlaid with the nuclear DAPI counterstain (e). Scale bar = 20 μm.
An image processing macro was written for ImageJ (NIH), which allowed the images to be consistently and quickly analyzed. The macro first projected the z-stacks into one image. Then each image was converted to grayscale, and the rolling ball function was used to subtract background noise. Finally, a threshold of 75 arbitrary units (aus) was applied, and all pixels that met this threshold were quantified and recorded. Each image represented 369,693.5 μm3 of tissue, and the total number of puncta per image was averaged within each subject.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical tests were conducted using RStudio (Version 1.2.1335) using default parameters, unless otherwise specified. Because each region had to be imaged at a unique laser power setting due to region-specific background staining levels, all three regions sampled were analyzed separately. Using the “car” package (Version 3.0.5), Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance was conducted on the number of puncta within each region across groups. Mixed linear effects models were performed using the “lmerTest” package (Version 3.1.0) for the average number of puncta within each image with pubertal group as a fixed factor and litter included as a random factor. Then, separate tests for analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted on the models and the residuals were checked for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. If data did not pass the homogeneity of variance test or if the residuals from the ANOVA models were not normally distributed, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysis. Post hoc testing for parametric data was accomplished using the “emmeans” package (Version 1.4.1) with a Bonferroni correction for 3 comparisons and post hoc testing for non-parametric data was conducted with the Dunn test for multiple comparisons with a Bonferroni correction for 3 comparisons.
Data from 9 pre-pubertal females, 12 post-pubertal females, and 8 adults was included in this study, and 1,152 images were analyzed from the 29 total subjects. mPFC images from one pre-pubertal female had to be excluded due to an imaging error.
Results
In the mPFC, we observed a significant difference among the variability between groups (F(2, 25) = 4.74, p = 0.018), so the non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test was used for analysis of puncta density. We observed a significant effect of group on puncta density (H = 8.13, 2 df, p = 0.02). A Dunn’s post hoc test demonstrated significant differences in puncta density between the pre- and post-pubertal females (p = 0.03) and the pre-pubertal and adult subjects (p = 0.04) (Figures 2a & 3).
Figure 2.
The density of Esr2 puncta was significantly decreased in the mPFC (a) after pubertal onset and in adulthood when compared to the pre-pubertal group. In both the striatum (b) and the motor cortex (MCx) (c), the puncta density was significantly lower in adult subjects compared to pre-pubertal subjects, with no significant decreases following pubertal onset. Bars indicate the mean puncta density ± SEM for each age group within a region. In all plots, lighter bars demarcate subjects that had reached puberty at the time of sacrifice, and darker bars indicate pre-pubertal subjects. [* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01]
Figure 3.
Representative images from the mPFC. Esr2 puncta density was significantly higher in pre-pubertal females (a) compared to recently post-pubertal (b) and adult (c) subjects. Puncta density between post-pubertal adolescents and adults did not significantly differ. Scalebar = 20 μm.
There was no significant effect of subregion in the striatum on the average number of puncta per image, so the data was collapsed across both areas for subsequent analysis. Though data from this region passed the homogeneity of variance test (F(2,26) = 2.68, p = 0.087), the Shapiro-Wilk revealed that the residuals from the ANOVA test were not normally distributed (W = 0.87, p = 0.002). Thus, the non-parametric test was used for further analysis. There was a significant effect of group on the total number of puncta (H = 7.46, 2df, p = 0.02). A post hoc test revealed a significant difference between the pre-pubertal and adult females (p = 0.03) (Figure 2b).
Likewise, within the motor cortex, no differences in the density of puncta per image were found between the upper and lower cortical layers, so all layers were combined for analysis. Similar to above, data from the motor cortex passed the homogeneity of variance test (F(2,26) = 1.27, p = 0.3), the Shapiro-Wilk test found the residuals from the ANOVA test were not normally distributed (W = 0.77, p < 0.001). The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant effect of group on puncta density (H = 9.80, 2 df, p = 0.007), and the post hoc test again revealed a significant difference between the pre-pubertal and adult females (p = 0.002) (Figure 2c).
Discussion
Esr2 expression was quantified in pre- and post-pubertal, as well as adult females. In the three neural regions examined, puncta labelled with Esr2 mRNA decreased between pre-pubertal adolescence and adulthood. However in the mPFC, the number of puncta dropped to adult-like levels just 24 hours after vaginal opening and pubertal onset; this abrupt decrease between pre- and post-pubertal subjects was not observed within the dorsal striatum or the motor cortex. We have previously hypothesized that gonadal hormones act to reorganize the mPFC during adolescence, and these findings support this in that changes to Esr2 expression may roughly translate to changes in levels of ERβ. Also, by using age-matched pre- and post-pubertal female siblings, we demonstrate that pubertal status, rather than linear age, can be a better predictor of cortical Esr2 expression in adolescent females.
Many studies have shown that both endogenous and supplemental estrogens can influence Esr2 levels in various cortical and subcortical regions, though the direction of these effects are highly region- and most likely dose-specific. For example, within the rodent hypothalamus, both ERα and ERβ vary in concentration across the estrous cycle 45–47. Estradiol supplementation increases Esr2 expression in the arcuate nucleus but decreases it in the paraventricular nucleus, amygdala, entorhinal cortex and thalamus 33,34,48. Some studies show that estradiol supplementation decreases Esr2 expression in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis 49,50, while others show no changes 34, indicating that the effects of estradiol on Esr2 levels are not always consistent. Nonetheless, ERβ and Esr2 expression are clearly dynamic and can fluctuate in the presence or absence of estradiol.
Interestingly, several studies have shown that estradiol does not alter Esr2 levels in the adult mPFC48,50, which would seem to indicate that our observed decrease in Esr2 mRNA puncta at pubertal onset was not driven by the rapid surge of estradiol that corresponds with vaginal opening 43. However, it is important to note these studies examined adult females that had been ovariectomized after pubertal onset and supplemented with a consistent dose of estradiol meant to replicate levels seen during proestrus. Given that the effects of estradiol on behavior and estrogen receptor expression can be highly dose-specific 33,51, studies that artificially replace estradiol after surgical removal of the ovaries likely do not mimic natural conditions.
Additionally, the aforementioned studies that examine the effects of estradiol on Esr2 expression were all conducted in adult subjects, and recent work suggests the functional effects of estradiol on the prefrontal cortex may be age-specific. For example, estradiol enhances fear extinction via actions in the infralimbic cortex in adult rats19,52–54, though the opposite is true in recently post-pubertal adolescent females, and pubertal estrogens impair fear extinction in these subjects 55. Furthermore, recently post-pubertal females show decreased mPFC PNNs compared to age- and litter-matched pre-pubertal females. This decrease persists for at least a week of adolescence before increasing to adult-like levels at P60 5, suggesting that circulating estrogens in post-pubertal females act differently on PNNs than circulating estrogens in adulthood. Therefore, it is possible that circulating estradiol decreases Esr2 expression in the developing mPFC, while having no effect on Esr2 expression levels in the adult mPFC.
Our results demonstrate that levels of Esr2 expression decrease between adolescence and adulthood in all three regions examined. In the prefrontal cortex, ERβ mRNA begins to rise shortly after birth and continues to increase until at least P25 29,30. Our study documents an abrupt decrease in prefrontal Esr2 mRNA at puberty, suggesting that ERβ may follow an inverted-U shaped trajectory and reach peak levels in the adolescent mPFC just before pubertal onset. If true, this would mirror our finding that the total number of synapses in the female mPFC peaks around pubertal onset 4, and further demonstrate the extensive restructuring of the adolescent cortex 2.
It is less clear if the same developmental trajectory of Esr2 expression occurs in the adolescent striatum or motor cortex. Despite the fact that both regions are directly modulated by estradiol 24,56,57, little evidence exists about how the hormonal environment influences ERβ expression or ontogeny in the motor cortex or striatum. We did not observe an abrupt decrease in expression of Esr2 in either region at pubertal onset, which may be due, in part, to the fact that there were fewer Esr2 puncta in these regions. This is consistent with what others have reported12,41and lower amounts of Esr2 expression could make it difficult to detect subtle differences. However, it is worth noting that there was a significant decrease in Esr2 expression between pre-pubertal adolescence and adulthood, so our results do not entirely exclude a role for post-pubertal estrogens in Esr2 expression in these regions. Future research on the topic is warranted.
Though we have previously reported female rats lose a significant number of neurons in the mPFC around the time of pubertal onset 58, we do not hypothesize that the abrupt decrease in prefrontal Esr2 puncta shown in this study is a direct result of this neuronal pruning. Here we describe here a nearly 50% decrease in Esr2 puncta density between pre- and post-pubertal females, which is considerably larger than the 11% decrease in neurons after puberty reported by Willing & Juraska 58. Additionally, an informal analysis of the neuron density data presented in Willing & Juraska58 revealed virtually no differences in neuron density (as opposed to total number) between pre- and post-pubertal females. The observed decrease in Esr2 puncta density reported here persists despite no observed change in neuron density, indicating a post-pubertal decrease in the number of puncta per neuron. Furthermore, within the mPFC, ERβ co-localizes extensively with inhibitory parvalbumin (PV) cells 59. Though the density and intensity of PV cells does decrease in the female mPFC between P40 and P7060, the magnitude of this drop is far lower than the 50% decrease observed here in Esr2 puncta. Our observed decrease in Esr2 puncta at pubertal onset appears to be due to a downregulation of the receptor and not simply driven by cellular pruning.
Given the anatomical relationship between ERβ and GABAergic cells 16,59, a decrease in prefrontal Esr2 expression at pubertal onset could have implications for cortical inhibition. Fine tuning of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the developing cortex is crucial for maturation of inhibitory control during adolescence 61, and pubertal estrogens organize mature inhibitory transmission in the mouse frontal cortex 6. Additionally, cortical inhibition in naturally-cycling adult female rats is regulated by the action of estradiol at ERβ 62. Our results add to a growing body of literature that suggests pubertal onset in females mediates an important shift in inhibitory neurotransmission.
Using RNAscope, we have found Esr2 expression levels are rapidly downregulated in the mPFC at pubertal onset. We demonstrate the decrease in Esr2 expression between adolescence and adulthood is not unique to the mPFC and was also observed in the dorsal striatum and motor cortex. While previous studies have quantified ERβ mRNA in juvenile or ovariectomized adult animals, we add a unique focus on puberty and adolescence to previous findings and demonstrate that this receptor is very much in flux across the pubertal transition. We hypothesize that levels of Esr2 expression may peak pre-pubertally, but future work that includes juvenile and older adult cohorts is necessary to fully elucidate the ontogeny of this receptor. Nonetheless, the results presented here underscore the importance of accounting for pubertal onset when studying adolescence and further suggest a critical role for estrogens in maturation of the female mPFC.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Core Facilities at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology for use of the LSM 880 microscope, as well as Austin Cyphersmith for his technical guidance.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Juraska JM, Sisk CL, DonCarlos LL. Sexual differentiation of the adolescent rodent brain: Hormonal influences and developmental mechanisms. Horm Behav. 2013;64:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Drzewiecki CM, Juraska JM. The structural reorganization of the prefrontal cortex during adolescence as a framework for vulnerability to the environment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020;199(199):173044. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.173044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Koss WA, Lloyd MM, Sadowski RN, Wise LM, Juraska JM. Gonadectomy before puberty increases the number of neurons and glia in the medial prefrontal cortex of female, but not male, rats. Dev Psychobiol. 2015;57(3):305–312. doi: 10.1002/dev.21290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Drzewiecki CM, Willing J, Juraska JM. Synaptic number changes in the medial prefrontal cortex across adolescence in male and female rats: A role for pubertal onset. Synapse. 2016;70(9). doi: 10.1002/syn.21909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drzewiecki CM, Willing J, Juraska JM. Influences of age and pubertal status on number of perineuronal nets in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Struct Funct. 2020;(0123456789). doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02137-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Piekarski DJ, Boivin JR, Wilbrecht L. Ovarian hormones organize the maturation of inhibitory neurotransmission in the frontal cortex at puberty onset in female mice. Curr Biol. 2017;27(12):1735–1745. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Willing J, Drzewiecki CM, Cuenod BA, Cortes LR, Juraska JM. A role for puberty in water maze performance in male and female rats. Behav Neurosci. 2016;130(4):422–427. doi: 10.1037/bne0000145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murray AJ, Woloszynowska-Fraser MU, Ansel-Bollepalli L, et al. Parvalbumin-positive interneurons of the prefrontal cortex support working memory and cognitive flexibility. Sci Rep. 2015;5(November):1–14. doi: 10.1038/srep16778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuiper GGJM, Carlsson B, Grandien K, et al. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors and α and β. Endocrinology. 1997;138(3):863–870. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.3.4979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu BT, Han G, Shim J, Wen Y, Jiang X. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship of Various Endogenous Estrogen Metabolites for Human Estrogen Receptor α and β Subtypes: Insights into the Structural Determinants Favoring a Differential Subtype Binding. Endocrinology. 2006;147(9):4132–4150. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shughrue PJ, Lane M V, Scrimo PJ, Merchenthaler I. Comparative distribution of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and beta (ER-beta) mRNA in the rat pituitary, gonad, and reproductive tract. Steroids. 1998;63(10):498–504. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(98)00054-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shughrue PJ, Lane M V, Merchenthaler I. Comparative distribution of estrogen receptor alpha and beta mRNA in rat CNS. J Comp Neurol. 1997;388(4):507–525. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rissman EF, Early AH, Taylor JA, Korach KD, Lubahn DB. Estrogen receptors are essential for female sexual receptivity. Endocrinology. 1997;138(1):507–510. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.1.4985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hewitt SC, Korach KS. Oestrogen receptor knockout mice: Roles for oestrogen receptors α and β in reproductive tissues. Reproduction. 2003;125(2):143–149. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1250143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo XZ, Su J Da, Sun QW, Jiao BH. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) -α and -β transcripts in the neonatal and adult rat cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and olfactory bulb. Cell Res. 2001;11(4):321–324. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kritzer MF. Regional, laminar and cellular distribution of immunoreactivity for ERα and ERβ in the cerebral cortex of hormonally intact, postnatally developing male and female rats. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:116–128. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shughrue PJ, Merchenthaler I. Distribution of estrogen receptor β immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2001;436(1):64–81. doi: 10.1002/cne.1054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rissman EF, Heck AL, Leonard JE, Shupnik MA, Gustafsson JÅ. Disruption of estrogen receptor β gene impairs spatial learning in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(6):3996–4001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012032699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zeidan MA, Igoe SA, Linnman C, et al. Estradiol modulates medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala activity during fear extinction in women and female rats. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(10):920–927. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clipperton Allen AE, Cragg CL, Wood AJ, Pfaff DW, Choleris E. Agonistic behavior in males and females: Effects of an estrogen receptor beta agonist in gonadectomized and gonadally intact mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35(7):1008–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Choleris E, Gustafsson JÅ, Korach KS, Muglia LJ, Pfaff DW, Ogawa S. An estrogen-dependent four-gene micronet regulating social recognition: A study with oxytocin and estrogen receptor-α and -β knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(10):6192–6197. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0631699100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Imwalle DB, Gustafsson JÅ, Rissman EF. Lack of functional estrogen receptor β influences anxiety behavior and serotonin content in female mice. Physiol Behav. 2005;84(1):157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Krezel W, Dupont S, Krust AE, Chambon P, Chapman PF. Increased anxiety and synaptic plasticity in estrogen receptor beta-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(21):12278–12282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221451898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lund TD, Rovis T, Chung WCJ, Handa RJ. Novel Actions of Estrogen Receptor beta on Anxiety-Related Behaviors. Endocrinology. 2005;146(2):797–807. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hughes A, Liu F, Platt BJ, et al. WAY-200070, a selective agonist of estrogen receptor beta as a potential novel anxiolytic/antidepressant agent. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:1136–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu F, Day M, Muñiz LC, et al. Activation of estrogen receptor-β regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity and improves memory. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(3):334–343. doi: 10.1038/nn2057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Liu F, Brandon NJ, Penzes P. Estrogen receptor β activity modulates synaptic signaling and structure. J Neurosci. 2010;30(40):13454–13460. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3264-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Penzes P. Insights into Rapid Modulation of Neuroplasticity by Brain Estrogens. Pharmacolo Rev. 2013;65(October):1318–1350. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.0052721318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mogi K, Takanashi H, Nagasawa M, Kikusui T. Sex differences in spatiotemporal expression of AR, ERα, and ERβ mRNA in the perinatal mouse brain. Neurosci Lett. 2015;584:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Westberry JM, Wilson ME. Regulation of estrogen receptor alpha gene expression in the mouse prefrontal cortex during early postnatal development. Neurogenetics. 2012;13(2):159–167. doi: 10.1007/s10048-012-0323-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kritzer MF. Regional, laminar and cellular distribution of immunoreactivity for ERβ in the cerebral cortex of hormonally intact, postnatally developing male and female rats. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16(8):1181–1192. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Byers M, Kuiper GGJM, Gustafsson J Estrogen receptor-β mRNA expression in rat ovary: Down-regulation by gonadotropins. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11(2):172–182. doi: 10.1210/mend.11.2.9887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Österlund M,G.j.m. Kuiper G, Gustafsson JÅ, Hurd YL. Differential distribution and regulation of estrogen receptor-α and -β mRNA within the female rat brain. Mol Brain Res. 1998;54(1):175–180. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00351-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Patisaul HB, Whitten PL, Young LJ. Regulation of estrogen receptor beta mRNA in the brain: opposite effects of 17β-estradiol and the phytoestrogen, coumestrol. Mol Brain Res. 1999;67:165–171. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(99)00058-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sagoshi S, Maejima S, Morishita M, Takenawa S, Otubo A, Takanami K. Detection and Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Beta Expression in the Brain with Newly Developed Transgenic Mice. Neuroscience. 2020;438:182–197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Advis JP, Andrews WW, Ojeda SR. Changes in ovarian steroidal and prostaglandin e responsiveness to gonadotropins during the onset of puberty in the female rat. Endocrinology. 1979;104(3):653–658. doi: 10.1210/endo-104-3-653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ojeda SR, Wheaton JE, Jameson HE, Mc Cann SM. The onset of puberty in the female rat: Changes in plasma prolactin, gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), and hypothalamic LHRH content. Endocrinology. 1976;98(3):630–638. doi: 10.1210/endo-98-3-630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parker CR, Mahesh VB. Hormonal events surrounding the natural onset of puberty in female rats. Biol Reprod. 1976;14(3):347–353. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod14.3.347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Snyder MA, Smejkalova T, Forlano PM, Woolley CS. Multiple ERβ antisera label in ERβ knockout and null mouse tissues. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;188(2):226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kanaya M, Higo S, Ozawa H. Neurochemical characterization of neurons expressing estrogen receptor β in the hypothalamic nuclei of rats using in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(1). doi: 10.3390/ijms21010115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mitra SW, Hoskin E, Yudkovitz J, et al. Immunolocalization of estrogen receptor β in the mouse brain: Comparison with estrogen receptor α. Endocrinology. 2003;144(5):2055–2067. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-221069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Döhler KD, Wuttke W. Changes with age in levels of serum gonadotropins, prolactin, and gonadal steroids in prepubertal male and female rats. Endocrinology. 1975;97(4):898–907. doi: 10.1210/endo-97-4-898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ojeda SR, Andrews WW, Advis JP, White SS, Introduction I. Recent Advances in the Endocrinology of Puberty. Endocr Rev. 1980;1(3):228–257. doi: 10.1210/edrv-1-3-228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grabinski TM, Kneynsberg A, Manfredsson FP, Kanaan NM. A method for combining rnascope in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry in thick free-floating brain sections and primary neuronal cultures. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sá SI, Fonseca BM. Dynamics of progesterone and estrogen receptor alpha in the ventromedial hypothalamus. J Endocrinol. 2017;233(2):197–207. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vega Helena CV, de Oliveira Poletini M, Sanvitto GL, Hayashi S, Franci CR, Anselmo-Franci JA. Changes in α-estradiol receptor and progesterone receptor expression in the locus coeruleus and preoptic area throughout the rat estrous cycle. J Endocrinol. 2006;188(2):155–165. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Olvera-Juárez E, Silva CC, Flores A, et al. The content of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), kisspeptin, and estrogen receptors (ERα/ERβ) in the anteromedial hypothalamus displays daily variations throughout the rat estrous cycle. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;381(3):451–460. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03258-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shima N, Yamaguchi Y, Yuri K. Distribution of estrogen receptor β mRNA-containing cells in ovariectomized and estrogen-treated female rat brain. Anat Sci Int. 2003;78(2):85–97. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-7722.2003.00042.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brown TJ, Scherz B, Hoehberg RB, Maclusky NJ. Regulation of estrogen receptor concentrations in the rat brain: Effects of sustained androgen and estrogen exposure. Neuroendocrinology. 1996;63:53–60. doi: 10.1159/000126935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Garcia AN, Bezner K, Depena C, Yin W, Gore AC. The effects of long-term estradiol treatment on social behavior and gene expression in adult female rats. Horm Behav. 2017;87:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tomihara K, Soga T, Nomura M, et al. Effect of ER-β gene disruption on estrogenic regulation of anxiety in female mice. Physiol Behav. 2009;96(2):300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Matsumoto YK, Kasai M, Tomihara K. The enhancement effect of estradiol on contextual fear conditioning in female mice. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Milad MR, Igoe SA, Lebron-Milad K, Novales JE. Estrous cycle phase and gonadal hormones influence conditioned fear extinction. Neuroscience. 2009;164:887–895. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Trask S, Reis DS, Ferrara NC, Helmstetter FJ. Decreased cued fear discrimination learning in female rats as a function of estrous phase. Learn Mem. 2020;27(6):254–257. doi: 10.1101/lm.051185.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Perry CJ, Ganella DE, Nguyen LD, et al. Assessment of conditioned fear extinction in male and female adolescent rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;116(January):104670. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Delevich K, Okada NJ, Rahane A, Zhang Z, Hall CD, Wilbrecht L. Sex and Pubertal Status Influence Dendritic Spine Density on Frontal Corticostriatal Projection Neurons in Mice. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30(6):3543–3557. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Le Saux M, Morissette M, Di Paolo T. ERβ mediates the estradiol increase of D2 receptors in rat striatum and nucleus accumbens. Neuropharmacology. 2006;50(4):451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Willing J, Juraska JM. The timing of neuronal loss across adolescence in the medial prefrontal cortex of male and female rats. Neuroscience. 2015;301:268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Blurton-Jones M, Tuszynski MH. Estrogen receptor-beta colocalizes extensively with parvalbumin-labeled inhibitory neurons in the cortex, amygdala, basal forebrain, and hippocampal formation of intact and ovariectomized adult rats. J Comp Neurol. 2002;452(3):276–287. doi: 10.1002/cne.10393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gildawie KR, Honeycutt JA, Brenhouse HC. Region-specific effects of maternal separation on perineuronal net and parvalbumin-expressing interneuron formation in male and female rats. Neuroscience. 2020;428:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Caballero A, Tseng KY. GABAergic function as a limiting factor for prefrontal maturation during adolescence. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(7):441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Clemens AM, Lenschow C, Beed P, et al. Estrus-Cycle Regulation of Cortical Inhibition. Curr Biol. 2019;29(4):605–615.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



